the university of washington pacific northwest mesoscale analysis system brian ancell, cliff mass,...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
The University of The University of Washington Pacific Washington Pacific
Northwest Northwest Mesoscale Analysis Mesoscale Analysis
SystemSystem
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. HakimJ. Hakim
University of WashingtonUniversity of Washington
MotivationMotivation
High-resolution analyses are High-resolution analyses are important for:important for:
• Operational forecasting (fire weather, Operational forecasting (fire weather, air quality..)air quality..)
MotivationMotivation
High-resolution analyses are High-resolution analyses are important for:important for:
• Operational forecasting (fire weather, Operational forecasting (fire weather, air quality..)air quality..)
• Studying the mesoscale effects of Studying the mesoscale effects of climate changeclimate change
MotivationMotivation
High-resolution analyses are High-resolution analyses are important for:important for:
• Operational forecasting (fire weather, Operational forecasting (fire weather, air quality..)air quality..)
• Studying the mesoscale effects of Studying the mesoscale effects of climate changeclimate change
• Alternative energy developmentAlternative energy development
MotivationMotivation
High-resolution analyses are important for:High-resolution analyses are important for:• Operational forecasting (fire weather, air Operational forecasting (fire weather, air
quality..)quality..)• Studying the mesoscale effects of climate Studying the mesoscale effects of climate
changechange• Alternative energy developmentAlternative energy development
Pacific Northwest complex terrain presents a Pacific Northwest complex terrain presents a challenge to creating good analyseschallenge to creating good analyses
• Flow-dependence during data assimilation may Flow-dependence during data assimilation may be vitalbe vital
An Attractive Option: An Attractive Option: EnKFEnKF
An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has strong potential for mesoscale has strong potential for mesoscale analysis:analysis:
• Observational information is spread Observational information is spread spatially using flow-dependent spatially using flow-dependent statisticsstatistics
An Attractive Option: An Attractive Option: EnKFEnKF
An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has strong potential for mesoscale has strong potential for mesoscale analysis:analysis:
• Observational information is spread Observational information is spread spatially using flow-dependent spatially using flow-dependent statisticsstatistics
• Analysis and forecast uncertainty is Analysis and forecast uncertainty is easily calculated and is also flow-easily calculated and is also flow-dependentdependent
An Attractive Option: An Attractive Option: EnKFEnKF
An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has strong potential for mesoscale analysis:strong potential for mesoscale analysis:
• Observational information is spread Observational information is spread spatially using flow-dependent statisticsspatially using flow-dependent statistics
• Analysis and forecast uncertainty is easily Analysis and forecast uncertainty is easily calculated and is also flow-dependentcalculated and is also flow-dependent
• Computational resources can handle Computational resources can handle EnKF demandEnKF demand
How the EnKF WorksHow the EnKF Works
An analysis is created from:An analysis is created from:
1) An ensemble of short-term forecasts 1) An ensemble of short-term forecasts (Background)(Background)
2) Observations2) Observations
For a single observation:For a single observation:Observation (T1)
Mean Forecast (T2)
Analysis (T3,V3)
Forecast Variance (V2)
Observation Variance (V1)
How the EnKF WorksHow the EnKF Works
An analysis is created from:An analysis is created from:
1) An ensemble of short-term forecasts 1) An ensemble of short-term forecasts (Background)(Background)
2) Observations2) Observations
For a single observation:For a single observation:Observation (T1)
Mean Forecast (T2)
Analysis (T3,V3)
Forecast Variance (V2)
Observation Variance (V1)
Analysis increment then spread spatially using covariance statistics of ensemble
EnKF ConfigurationEnKF Configuration Large, coarse domain EnKF already Large, coarse domain EnKF already
tested (Torn and Hakim 2008)tested (Torn and Hakim 2008)
- EnKF competitive with global - EnKF competitive with global modelsmodels
EnKF ConfigurationEnKF Configuration WRF model V2.1.2WRF model V2.1.2 38 vertical levels38 vertical levels 80 ensemble members80 ensemble members 6-hour update cycle6-hour update cycle Observations:Observations:
• Surface temperature, wind, altimeterSurface temperature, wind, altimeter• ACARS aircraft winds, temperatureACARS aircraft winds, temperature• Cloud-track windsCloud-track winds• Radiosonde wind, temperature, Radiosonde wind, temperature,
relative humidityrelative humidityHalf of surface obs used for assimilation, other half for verification
EnKF 36-km vs. 12-kmEnKF 36-km vs. 12-km
Improvement of 12-km EnKFAnalysi
sForecast
10%
10% 10%
13%
Wind Temperature
Issue #1 – Issue #1 – Representative ErrorRepresentative Error
Model terrain = Actual Model terrain = Actual terrain terrain
at and near observation sitesat and near observation sites
Actual terrain
Model terrain
Surface ObservationsSurface Observations
Model grid points (12-km resolution)
Model grid points (12-km resolution)
Surface ObservationsSurface Observations
Model grid points (12-km resolution)
Model grid points (12-km resolution)
Observation location
Surface ObservationsSurface Observations
Model grid points (12-km resolution)
Model grid points (12-km resolution)
High-resolution terrain data (1.33 km resolution)
Observation location
Issue #1 – Issue #1 – Representative ErrorRepresentative Error
Using representative observations Using representative observations only, we can reduce observation only, we can reduce observation uncertainty:uncertainty:
Observation Standard DeviationsObservation Standard Deviations
Temp: 1.8 K (36-km) 1.0 K Temp: 1.8 K (36-km) 1.0 K (12-km)(12-km)
Wind: 2.5 m/s (36-km) 1.5 m/s Wind: 2.5 m/s (36-km) 1.5 m/s (12-km)(12-km)
Issue #1 – Issue #1 – Representative ErrorRepresentative Error
Using representative observations only, we Using representative observations only, we can reduce observation uncertainty:can reduce observation uncertainty:
Observation Standard DeviationsObservation Standard Deviations
Temp: 1.8 K (36-km) 1.0 K (12-km)Temp: 1.8 K (36-km) 1.0 K (12-km)
Wind: 2.5 m/s (36-km) 1.5 m/s (12-Wind: 2.5 m/s (36-km) 1.5 m/s (12-km)km)
Drawback: Lose ~75% of available surface Drawback: Lose ~75% of available surface obsobs
Issue #1 – Issue #1 – Representative ErrorRepresentative Error
Improvement using reduced observation uncertaintyAnalysi
s5% 10%
Wind Temperature
Issue #2 – Lack of Issue #2 – Lack of Background Surface Background Surface
VarianceVariance Too little background variance exists Too little background variance exists
in model surface fieldsin model surface fields
Issue #2 – Lack of Issue #2 – Lack of Background Surface Background Surface
VarianceVariance Too little background variance exists Too little background variance exists
in model surface fieldsin model surface fields
Solution: Inflate surface variance with variance aloft
Issue #3 – Model Surface Issue #3 – Model Surface BiasBias
Significant biases exist in the model Significant biases exist in the model surface wind and temperature fieldssurface wind and temperature fields
Temperature Bias
Light Wind Speed (<3 knots) Bias
Further Improvement After Further Improvement After Variance Inflation, Bias Variance Inflation, Bias
RemovalRemoval
Improvement using inflation and bias removalAnalysi
s9% 3%
Wind Temperature
EnKF 12-km vs. GFS, NAM, EnKF 12-km vs. GFS, NAM, RUCRUC
RMS analysis errors GF
S2.38 m/s
2.28 KNAMRUCEnKF 12-km
Wind Temperature
2.30 m/s2.13 m/s1.85 m/s
2.54 K2.35 K1.67 K
SummarySummary A multi-scale, nested WRF EnKF (36km, 12km, 4km) is being tested over the A multi-scale, nested WRF EnKF (36km, 12km, 4km) is being tested over the
Pacific Northwest to produce quality analyses and short-term forecastsPacific Northwest to produce quality analyses and short-term forecasts
Three obstacles to accurate surface analyses were discovered and dealt with Three obstacles to accurate surface analyses were discovered and dealt with using the 12-km EnKF:using the 12-km EnKF:
• Poor model terrain height profile (representative check)Poor model terrain height profile (representative check)• Lack of model surface forecast variance (variance inflation from Lack of model surface forecast variance (variance inflation from
aloft)aloft)• Model surface wind and temperature bias (pre-assimilation bias Model surface wind and temperature bias (pre-assimilation bias
removal)removal)
Resulting WRF 12-km EnKF surface analyses were better than the WRF 36-km Resulting WRF 12-km EnKF surface analyses were better than the WRF 36-km EnKF, GFS, NAM, and RUCEnKF, GFS, NAM, and RUC
Future direction:Future direction:• Better bias removal techniquesBetter bias removal techniques• Tuning of data assimilation parametersTuning of data assimilation parameters• Testing of 4-km nested domainTesting of 4-km nested domain• Evaluation of analysis fields aloftEvaluation of analysis fields aloft• Short-range forecast verificationShort-range forecast verification• Comparison with current NWS mesoscale analysis techniques Comparison with current NWS mesoscale analysis techniques
(RTMA, MOA)(RTMA, MOA)