the urban institute 1 express lane eligibility prepared for the national academy for state health...

25
THE URBAN INSTITUTE 1 Express Lane Eligibility Prepared for the National Academy for State Health Policy Stan Dorn The Urban Institute May 14, 2009

Upload: buddy-davidson

Post on 28-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 1

Express Lane Eligibility

Prepared for the National Academy for State Health Policy

Stan Dorn The Urban Institute

May 14, 2009

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2

Topics to discuss

•Why this matters•What’s the thinking behind Express Lane

Eligibility (ELE)? •Promising opportunities to use ELE

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 3

1. Why this matters

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 4

Most uninsured children are eligible for Medicaid or CHIP

Uninsured children, by eligibility for Medicaid and CHIP: 2004

Eligible for CHIP22%

Ineligible for Both26%

Eligible for Medicaid

52%

Sources: Dorn, et al., Feb. 2009, applying eligibility simulation model described in Dubay, et al., 2007.

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 5

New financial incentives in CHIPRA

•Increased CHIP enrollment can raise future CHIP allocationsAnd lower enrollment can cut

future allocations•Increased Medicaid enrollment

can qualify for performance bonusesSo long as state implements 5 of

8 “best practices,” which include ELE

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 6

2. Express Lane Eligibility (ELE): one rationale

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 7

The value added question

•When a family has already shown low income by filling out forms for one government agency, what is the value of requiring it to complete a similar form for a different government agency? •How does that value compare to the

consequences for:Enrollment;Household convenience; andAdministrative costs?

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 8

The impact of inertia and procrastination on human behavior

Percentage of eligible workers who participate in tax-advantaged retirement accounts

9%

33%

90%

Independent enrollment inIRA

Firms where new hiresenroll in 401(k) only after

completing a form

Firms where new hires gointo 401(k) UNLESS they

complete an opt-out form

Sources: Sailer and Holden, 2005; Laibson (NBER), 2005.

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 9

3. Potentially promising applications of Express Lane Eligibility (ELE)

a) State income tax formsb) Food Stampsc) National School Lunch Program

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 10

State income taxes

An extraordinary opportunity to locate uninsured children

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 11

Uninsured children who qualify for Medicaid or CHIP, by legal requirement to file federal income taxes and eligibility for federal EITC: 2004

Legally required to file federal income

tax returns79%

Not legally required to file, but eligible

for EITC12%

Neither legally required to file nor

eligible for EITC9%

Source: Dorn, et al., Feb. 2009.

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 12

Among various groups of uninsured children, the estimated percentage whose families filed federal income tax returns: 2004

90.7% 87.2% 94.5% 89.4%

9.3% 12.8% 5.5% 10.6%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

All Eligible forMedicaid

Eligible forSCHIP

Eligible forEither Program

Families file returns Families do not file

Sources: Dorn, et al., Feb. 2009.

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 13

What about state income tax forms?

•What’s your state’s minimum income threshold for required tax filing?•Does your state provide any refundable credits

(e.g., an EITC or child care credit that supplements the federal credit)?•Remember—if income is withheld from a

paycheck, the worker may need to file a state tax return to get a refund

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 14

How it could work1. On tax form:

Require parents to identify their uninsured children Let parents request disclosure of tax data to the state’s health

agency Very important step. Without it, parents must file 2 forms, an income tax

form and a later health coverage form. o In Iowa, the state mailed application forms to parents who identified

their children as uninsured on state income tax returns. Only 10% applied.

2. Grant income-eligibility based on gross income (or AGI) and household size on income tax form

3. Qualify children as citizens based on SSA data match (starting in 2010)

4. Determine immigration status Intensive application assistance to obtain immigration evidence

Can obtain in the enrollment phase In the meantime, can provide presumptive eligibility (PE) based on income

alone Possible ELE based on SSA determination of permanent legal

residence when issuing SSN

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 15

How it could work, continued5. If child is not eligible based on ELE, CHIPRA requires

the family to have a chance to submit a standard application

6. Collecting any remaining paperwork Can direct families to on-line forms

CHIPRA allows electronic signature Can use CBOs, facilitated enrollers In a managed care state, can use MCOs

Let the family pick an MCO If the family doesn’t act, the state chooses an MCO Once the MCO has been chosen, the MCO must collect

the final paperwork before capitated payments starto Key: no MCO contact until a plan is chosen

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 16

Possible concerns• Parents may mislabel children as uninsured

Confirm by running data match against Medicaid/CHIP files, perhaps Medicaid TPL records of private coverage

• Revenue agency may resist changing tax returnIA, MD, NJ already use return to ask re children’s coverage MA uses return to request proof of coverage for adults

• Revenue agency may be concerned about violating the confidentiality of tax data

Consent to disclosure should address those concerns • Self-employment income

For tax purposes, can deduct from even gross income Meals; Entertainment; Depreciation; etc.

Could add back these deductions in calculating gross income or adjusted gross income, for purposes of ELE

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 17

Final concern: tax information is so last year!•CHIPRA expressly allows using tax returns for ELE

Can only use within a “reasonable period,” defined by state•Multiple federal programs already do this

Prior-year tax returns establish current-year eligibilityWhat if your situation changed?

If income rose this year, eligibility not reduced until next year

If income fell this year, can immediately apply for extra helpNo application required if you file a tax form (although an

application process is available as a fall-back)Once exception: applications are needed for college

student aid. However, President Obama proposes to replace them with a “check-box” on the federal income tax return.

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 18

Income tax returns and eligibility for various federally-funded, means-tested benefits

Tax return for Establishes eligibility during

Medicare Part B premium subsidies

2007 Calendar year 2009

Student aid for college

2007 School year 2008-2009

Rebate checks from 2008 stimulus legislation

2007 2008

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 19

Food stamps – basic eligibility rules

• Income eligibility130 percent of FPL in gross income100 percent of FPL in net income

• Must be citizen or legal permanent resident (but no 5-year bar)

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 20

How food stamp ELE could work1. Identify uninsured children

Match food stamp eligibility files with Medicaid and CHIP files to identify food stamp children not receiving health coverage

Permitted by pre-CHIPRA food stamp law

2. Let parents opt out Send notice explaining that, unless they object, data from their

children’s food stamp files will be used to determine potential eligibility for health coverage

3. Determine eligibility Automatically find, via ELE, that

All food stamp children are income-eligible for Medicaid; All immigrant food stamp children are legally residing in the U.S.,

for purposes of Medicaido Maybe not in a state with a 5-year bar for newly arrived

immigrants Establish citizenship via SSA data-match (2010 and later)

4. Parents must consent before enrollment

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 21

Trade-offs•Potential advantages

Huge efficiency gains. Almost no value is added by requiring a separate health application. Among uninsured food-stamp children, only 1/10th of 1% are ineligible for Medicaid and CHIP.

Statistic applies to states that use CHIPRA to cover recently arrived immigrant children

In other states, almost all uninsured, citizen children receiving food stamps qualify for Medicaid and CHIP under existing law

Matchable, accessible data

•Potential disadvantagesNot enormous reach: 12.4 percent of eligible, uninsured children

received food stamps in 200441% of food stamp children without Medicaid or CHIP are

privately insured Need to do data match with information about private coverage

Some questions about categorically eligible Food Stamp recipients – good argument for applying ELE, but no CMS ruling

Families with TANF, SSI, GA can automatically get Food Stamps

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 22

National School Lunch Program (NSLP): eligibility

• Income eligibility based on gross income Up to 130 percent of FPL, free school lunch 130-185 percent of FPL, reduced-price lunch

• No immigration status requirements

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 23

How ELE could work with NSLP1. On NSLP application form, parents can:

Identify any uninsured children; and Consent to disclose NSLP and other data to determine

children’s eligibility for free or reduced-cost health coverage2. If children receive free lunches, use ELE to automatically

qualify them as income-eligible for Medicaid 3. If children receive reduced-price lunches, either

Use NSLP income-determination to establish income-eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP or

Provide PE and target children for intensive assistance to determine ongoing eligibility

4. For anything beyond PE, state must establish that NSLP children are citizens or legal immigrants

5. Collection of remaining paperwork Can follow income tax approach

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 24

Trade-offs•Potential advantages

Broad reach: 59 percent of uninsured, low-income children live in families who participate in NSLP

•Potential disadvantagesIn many states

Limited digitization of matchable enrollment records“District-by-district” implementation is time consuming

Schools have other priorities Illinois law bases a district’s receipt of poverty-related school

financing on, among other things, Medicaid and CHIP receiptError rates

For free lunches, not a problem. NSLP errors do not extend health coverage to very many otherwise ineligible children. That’s because maximum income eligibility for free lunches is far below CHIP income limits.

For reduced price lunches, NSLP errors are more consequential.

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 25

Recipients of free and reduced-price school lunches, by income-eligibility for health coverage (based on actual income)

Children receiving free school lunches

Children receiving reduced-price school lunches

Income-eligible for Medicaid

81% 49%

Income-eligible for CHIP

14% 38%

Income too high for both programs

4% 13%

Total: 100% 100%

Source: Dorn, April 2009.