the u.s. food and fiber industry chapter 2. discussion topics review of index numbers and real value...
TRANSCRIPT
Discussion Topics
Review of index numbers and real value of money
What is the food and fiber industry?Review the changing complexion of
farmingDiscuss the role of other sectors in
the food and fiber industry
Output and Price Indices
1990 is the base year as index set to 1.0
1990 is the base year as index set to 1.0
Page 14Page 14
1.16 = 0.84÷0.72 Price 16% higher in 1995 that it was in 1990….
1.16 = 0.84÷0.72 Price 16% higher in 1995 that it was in 1990….
Apple Production Appple Price
YearMillion
Lbs.OutputIndex $/lb
Price Index
1985 4,162 0.86 $0.66 0.91
1990 4,828 1.00 0.72 1.00
1995 5,289 1.10 0.84 1.16
2002 4,278 0.89 0.95 1.32
1.10 = 4,278÷4,828Output 11% lower in2002 than it was in1990….
1.10 = 4,278÷4,828Output 11% lower in2002 than it was in1990….
Nominal and Real Expenditures
CPI was 52.4% higher in 1995 than it was in1982-84 period
CPI was 52.4% higher in 1995 than it was in1982-84 period
1982-84 avg is the base year for the CPI
1982-84 avg is the base year for the CPI
Year
Nominal Expenditures
(Mil. $)
CPI(1982-84
=1.0)
Real Expenditures
(Mil. $)
1980 120.3 0.824 145.99
1985 168.8 1.076 156.91
1990 248.5 1.307 190.10
1995 302.4 1.524 198.44
2002 385.8 1.722 224.03
198.44 = 302.4÷1.524 The increasing CPI eroded the purchasing power of the dollar….
198.44 = 302.4÷1.524 The increasing CPI eroded the purchasing power of the dollar….
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
The agricultural (food) industry can be divided into four major sectors: Farm service Agricultural Producers Processors Wholesale/Retail distributors and
marketers
The final marketing chain component is represented by consumers
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical
sales, fertilizer sales etc.)
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Producers(Farmers, ranchers, etc.)
ConsumersMarketers
(Distributors, retailers, etc.)
Agricultural Sector Importance
Pages 17-26
An estimated one-fifth of all jobs in the U.S. are related to some aspect of the food industryIn many developing countries, more than
half of the labor force engaged in agriculture
On a global basis the food industry is the largest industry in terms of people employed and value of product
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Consumers
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical
sales, fertilizer sales etc.)
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
The farm service sector provides producers with inputs such as feed, fertilizer, fuel, equipment and chemicals.Many firms are multinational corporations:
John Deere, DuPont, and Monsanto
There are also a variety of small, local service companies that serve diverse needs of local farmers for irrigation equipment, farm structures, etc.
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Also numerous firms that provide farmers with financial services i.e., Banking, accounting, insurance, legal
advice, risk management and agronomic consulting
As farming becomes increasingly complex, farmers are pressed to rely heavily on providers of farm services A fast-growing, highly localized sector of the
food industry
Relative Importance of Farm Input ExpendituresRelative Importance of Farm Input Expenditures
Page 27
Agriculture sector as a whole Relative values depend on farm type
Relative Importance of Dairy Farm Input ExpendituresRelative Importance of Dairy Farm Input Expenditures
Source: Economic Research Service, USDAData is for 2009
Compared to 24% for all of agriculture
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical, sales, etc.)
Producers(Farmers, ranchers, etc.)
Consumers
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
The producer sector includes those engaged in the biological processes associated with production of food/fiber i.e., Farmers, ranchers, fruit growers,
nurserymen, etc.
Producers purchase from farm service sector and sell to the processor sector There is an increasing movement for
producers selling directly to consumers
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical, sales, etc.)
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Producers(Farmers, ranchers, etc.)
Consumers
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
The processor sector creates value by converting agricultural commodities into products that consumers want Processors change form of primary product Processors can provide a
storage function (i.e., Hook’s 15 year old aged cheddar)
Processors can provide transportation services
Value added to raw agricul-tural commoditys via above activities $80/ lb
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Commodities
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Food Products
Processors can be divided into two types:Commodities processors – (i.e., milling wheat
into flour for use as an input) Flour is an intermediate input for more
processingFood products processors - (i.e., cheese plant
that transform milk into cheese for direct consumption)
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Sometimes a company engages in both types of processing activitiesHershey
Processes cocoa beans into powder (a commodity)
Makes candy for direct sale (a food product)ConAgra Foods
Processes soybeans into oil to make Blue Bonnet®, Fleischmann’s®, and Parkay® margarines (a commodity)
Sells soybean oil directly to consumers (a food product)
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Food product processors can be further divided into two categoriesProcessors that produce for retail food
consumersThose that produce for food service (via
distributors)
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Commodities
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
At-Home Away from Home
Food Products
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
% of Food Expenditures Away From Home
23.5
27.0
30.5
34.0
37.5
41.0
44.5
48.0
51.5
Today, approximately 50% of food expenditures is spent on food eaten away-from-home
Today, approximately 50% of food expenditures is spent on food eaten away-from-home
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
A good example of a food product processor is the Coca-Cola CompanyPurchases high-fructose corn sweetener
(HFCS) from a commodity processor such as ADM or Cargill
Combines HFCS with other ingredients using their secret formula to produce Coke®
In cans and bottles for the retail market In bulk for the food service industry
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical, sales, etc.)
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Producers(Farmers, ranchers, etc.)
Consumers
Marketers(Distributors, retailers, etc.)
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Commodities
At-Home Away from Home
Food Products
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Wholesalers Distributors
Marketers
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
The marketing sector creates value in the food industry by changing the time and place of food Ties the producer and consumer sectors
together Coca-Cola plays the role of wholesaler
and distributor in the marketing sector
The Agricultural Sector
Commodities
At-Home Away from Home
Food Products
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Wholesalers Distributors
Retailers Restaurants, Institutions, etc
Sells toFinal Consumer
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical
sales, fertilizer sales etc.)
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Producers(Farmers, ranchers, etc.)
ConsumersMarketers
(Distributors, retailers, etc.)
Coordination in Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Coordination: The communication system that conveys consumer wants to the producer
Marketers are companies that tie the final food consumer to the processor Their job is to make certain that whatever
the consumer wants is available when and where the consumer wants it
Coordination in Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Traditionally, coordination has been accomplished by prices sending signals from one link in the marketing chain to the nextThis is changing with management/strategic
alliances replacing markets Dairy Farmers of America (DFA): Major dairy
farm cooperative controlling large amounts of raw milk
Dean Foods: Very large bottler of fluid milk DFA and Dean Foods have entered into an
exclusive supply arrangement in New England
Coordination in Agriculture
Pages 17-26
At the fluid processing level, large consolidated processors dominate the fluid milk industry. These include: (1) Dean Foods, which has a long term strategic alliance (full supply contracts) with DFA, and operates 12 plants in the Mideast and processes an estimated 250-300 million pounds of milk per month at these plants…...Prof. Ron Cotterill, Univ. of CT, 2005
At the fluid processing level, large consolidated processors dominate the fluid milk industry. These include: (1) Dean Foods, which has a long term strategic alliance (full supply contracts) with DFA, and operates 12 plants in the Mideast and processes an estimated 250-300 million pounds of milk per month at these plants…...Prof. Ron Cotterill, Univ. of CT, 2005
Coordination in Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Historically most retail stores Purchase products from wholesalers Wholesalers
Purchased in bulk from processors Sell in smaller batches to retailers
Many smaller retailers still use this system
Many larger retail chains combine wholesale and retail functions Reduces transaction costs Reduced costs can be
Passed on to consumers as lower prices or Captured by the producer as higher profits
Coordination in Agriculture
One of the the largest U.S. food retailer (by sales volume) is Kroger$66 billion of food & other items/ yearNearly 2,500 retail outlets.Kroger does both wholesaling & food product
processing 42 plants making 3,000 products sold by the chain
This illustrates a significant trend in the food system know as vertical integrationSeveral steps in the food system chain are
placed under single management control
Coordination in AgricultureVertical integration allows a firm to
coordinate the food system stages via internal management Without integration: Coordination is
accomplished by price signals sent to and received from various markets
With increased vertical integration → An increase in the role of management in
coordination→A decline in the role of markets in the
coordination of the food system
The Agricultural Sector
Pages 17-26
Farm Service Sector(Implement dealers, chemical
sales, fertilizer sales etc.)
Processors(Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.)
Producers(Farmers, ranchers, etc.)
ConsumersMarketers
(Distributors, retailers, etc.)
Example of Vertical Integration
Coordination in Agriculture
What are the pros and cons of non-market coordination? Markets and prices are highly visible and
the consumer has many choicesNon-market coordination can be more
efficient (particularly in large volumes) than market price coordination →lower prices to the consumer
Coordination in Agriculture
What does the consumer want—more choice or lower prices? The answer is clear when one compares the
successes of Sears (“Good, better, and best”) vs. Wal-Mart (“Everyday low prices”) over the past 20 years Wal-Mart has outpaced other competitors
over this time period Sears is searching for survival strategies
(e.g. acquisition of Lands End)
Physical structure of agricultural industryFewer number of farms but larger-sizedIncreasing use of capital relative to laborIncreasing productivity per unit of input
Financial structure and performanceVolatility of net farm income reduced by
subsidies although dairy is an exceptionDeclining debt use strengthens equity positionRecovering real estate values after sharp
declines during financial crises of mid-1980s
Pages 17-26
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Structure of Agriculture
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.8
3.0
3.3
3.5
3.8
4.0
Mil
lion
s
Number of U.S. Farms
Page 22
30% ↑
Structure of Agriculture
Note: This expansion has occurred with significant decrease in farm numbers
Agricultural Production Index
Pages 17-26
Structure of Agriculture
Proportion of U.S. Milk Production by Herd Size
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
< 100 HD 100-199 HD 200-499 HD
500-999 1000-2000 HD 2000+ HD
Page 21
Declining Role of Hired Farm LaborDeclining Role of Hired Farm Labor
Labor Capital Materials
Note: There is an error in the text
Structure of Agriculture
Structure also concerned with use of various inputs Note decline in role of labor
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
There is public concern that the family farm is giving way to large, impersonal, factory farms. Farm operators are about 1.6% of the
U.S. population
Characterizing attributes of the American farms and farmers → Study of farm structure. What do farms in the U.S. look like
today?
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
In 1915: 6.5 million U.S. farms Approximately 2 million farms today
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines a farm as:Any establishment that produces (or
should produce) at least $1,000 of farm products each year
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
With roughly 305 million Americans, the average American farmer feeds himself and 152 others Exports account for an additional 50
persons fed by U.S. agriculture
The U.S. food chain can viewed as an inverted pyramid from producer to consumer A very narrow base made up by farm
operators Farm Operators
Consumers
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Popular press often asserts that farming is being taken over by large, corporate farms2 million U.S. farms, 98% are family farmsFamily farms produce about 85% of the
total agricultural production value90% are owned by sole proprietors, rest
owned by partnerships or multifamily corp.
Non-family farms2.2% of all farm unitsProduce 15% of total farm output
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Using the USDA U.S. farm typology 14% or 300,000 are retired 40% of farm operators listed primary
occupation as a non-farm occupation i.e. Hobby farm where operator works primarily
off-farm & maintains farm as part of lifestyle 38% listed occupation as farm with gross
sales less then $250,000 Profit rate of 3% →$7,500 profit
→ 8% or 160,000 farms are large, economically viable enterprises Account for about 2/3 of farm sales
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
What is the typical American farm like? Farm numbers: Most are either retirement
homes or hobby farms.Almost all of the remaining are family farms:
Only about 20,000 large, non-family farms
Clear trend among these food producers is toward fewer, larger farm unitsIncreasingly specialized in what they produce
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Lessons to be learned from the study of the structure of U.S. farms There is no such thing as an average farm
Good example are Wisconsin dairy farms:Grazers (i.e., low input technology)→Feedlot (purchase all feed)
Averages may cover up more than they reveal When asked as to the average cost of
production my response is that “it depends”• Type of technology used• Farm size
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Increasing public policy concerns as to the degree of concentration in food processingConcentration: The degree to which a small
number of firms account for a large market share
Example of 2010 USDA/U.S. Department of Justice hearings as to competitiveness in the U.S. food sector
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/workshops/ag2010/index.htmhttp://www.justice.gov/atr/public/workshops/ag2010/index.htm
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
First time there has been a set of joint DOJ/USDA workshops to discuss competition and regulatory issues in the agriculture industry
Workshop goals:Promote dialogue among interested partiesFoster learning with respect to appropriate
legal and economic analyses of these issuesListen to and learn from parties with real-
world experience in the agric. sector
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
A measure of concentration is the % of the total market accounted for by the four (or any other number) largest producers (CR4).U.S. breakfast cereal industry has a CR4 of 87%Virtually all baby food is produced by the 3
largest firms
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Significant concentration in meat packingBeef processing has a CR4 of 85%
1 of these being foreign ownedSmaller competitors bought out via
consolidationLarge poultry producer, Tyson Foods, recently
bought the second-largest beef processor
Some beef cattle producers have called for Federal legislation to prevent any further consolidation
Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Is concentration in the food industry bad? Processors say consolidating into fewer, larger
firms allows them to cut costs They assert it benefits consumers
Processors assert that they need to consolidate due to retail consolidation
Opponents argue that it provides the processors with unusual market power Allows them to buy from farmers who have little
market power that border on exploitation Unequal bargaining power Why dairy cooperatives formed and today market
more than 75% of raw milk in the U.S.
Price Volatility in U.S. Agriculture
Page 21
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
Average WI Price Recieved for Corn Grain ($/bu)
$4.25
$6.00
$7.75
$9.50
$11.25
$13.00
$14.75
$16.50
$18.25
$20.00
$21.75MW/BFP/Class III Prices ($/cwt)
This is the price of milk used for cheese manufacturing
This is the price of milk used for cheese manufacturing
Price Volatility in U.S. Agriculture
Globalization of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Commodity processors tend to be on the forefront of globalizationBecause demand for processing technologies
is truly global as we all need food to survive.
The most successful commodity processors are very internationalized with processing facilities world-wide
Globalization of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Globalization in food product processing has not been as strong Consumers have different tastes and
preferences across countriesi.e., final food product soybeans may be soy protein
meal in country A, tofu in country B, and a steak in country C
Food product processors are making a push to globalizeProcessed food market growth dramatically
increasing in many developing countriesContrast this with stagnant growth in the U.S.
Globalization of Agriculture
Pages 17-26
Criticism of GlobalizationFood security—every country wants to be
certain its nutritional needs will be met. As an industry becomes globalized, individual
countries lose control to multinational companies that may have different objectives
Global concentration: similar to the issue of industrial concentration A Brazilian firm, the world’s largest beef
processor has acquired one of the largest U.S. beef processors
Farm Profitability What do we mean by farm profitability?
Page 24
Cash receipts from farm marketings (Price x Quantity)
+ Government payments
+ Other income from farm sources
= Gross farm income
– Production expenses
= Nominal net farm income
÷ Broadly-based price deflator
= Real net farm income
Page 24
Instability of Net Farm IncomeInstability of Net Farm Income
Real net farm income in 1983 had the same purchasing power as 1933
Real net farm income in 1983 had the same purchasing power as 1933
Financial Structure What do we mean by farm profitability?
Value of real estate assets (i.e., owned land, buildings, etc.)
+ Value of non-real estate assets (i.e., tractor, combines, stored grain, etc.
+ Value of financial assets (i.e., savings accounts, IRA’s)
= Total assets
– Total liabilities or debt
= Equity or Net WorthPage 25
Page 25
Liabilitiesor debt
Liabilitiesor debt
AssetsAssets
Equity or net worth
Equity or net worth
Start of FarmFinancial crisis
Start of FarmFinancial crisis
Low commodity prices High interest rates
Page 25
Duration of FarmFinancial crisis
Duration of FarmFinancial crisis
Liabilitiesor debt
Liabilitiesor debt
AssetsAssets
Equity or net worth
Equity or net worth
Marketing BillMarketing Bill: The portion of food
expenditures associated with activities of firms beyond the farm gate
More than 80% of every dollar spend on food is represented by the marketing bill For every $100 spent at the supermarket…The farm service sector accounts for about $12The production sector (i.e., farmers), about $7The remaining $81 goes to processors of agricultural
commodities, and the marketing system that bringsfood to your table
Pages 27-29
Only 19 percent of each dollar spent on food products goesto farmers and ranchers…
Only 19 percent of each dollar spent on food products goesto farmers and ranchers…
Page 32
Where a food dollar goesWhere a food dollar goes
% of Food Purchase Dollar Returned to the Farm% of Food Purchase Dollar Returned to the Farm
Trend Line: Explains 92% of variability
Farm Value %
The % allocation across categories has remained relatively constant
% of Food Purchase Dollar Returned to the Farm% of Food Purchase Dollar Returned to the Farm
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Cereals BeefFruit Fresh VegCheese Whole Milk
Often referred to as Farm-Retail Margin
In SummaryIncreasing role of capitalProductivityWeak real profitabilityInterrelationship among sectors in the food
and fiber industryFarmers/ranchers share of food dollar