the washington-british columbia transboundary climate … · 2016-06-08 · washington-british...
TRANSCRIPT
The Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project:
Climate impacts and adaptation actions for wildlife habitat connectivity in the transboundary region of Washington and British Columbia
Prepared by the Climate Impacts Group University of Washington April 30, 2016
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project i
Acknowledgements
The work described in this report was completed by science-practice partnerships involvingparticipantsfrom:
• BCMinistryofForests,Lands,andNaturalResourceOperations
• BCParks
• ColvilleConfederatedTribes
• OkanaganNationAlliance
• PacificClimateImpactsConsortium
• TransboundaryConnectivityGroup
• UniversityofWashingtonClimateImpactsGroup
• USForestService
• USNationalParkService
Funding
Fundingforthisworkwasgenerouslyprovidedby:
• CharlotteMartinFoundation
• GreatNorthernLandscapeConservationCooperative
• NorthPacificLandscapeConservationCooperative
• NorthwestClimateScienceCenter
• WilburforceFoundation
Document CitationKrosby,M.,Michalak,J.,Robbins,T.O.,Morgan,H.,Norheim,R.,Mauger,G.,andT.Murdock.2016.TheWashington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project: Identifying climate impactsandadaptationactionsforwildlifehabitatconnectivityinthetransboundaryregionofWashingtonandBritishColumbia.ClimateImpactsGroup,UniversityofWashington.
Document and Data Layers Availability This document and companion files, including reports and data layers, are available online at:https://nplcc.databasin.org/galleries/5a3a424b36ba4b63b10b8170ea0c915
Coverphoto:MethowValleybyCurtSmith,usedunderCCBY-NC-ND2.0
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project ii
Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 11. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 22. Project Partners .......................................................................................................... 43. Assessment Approach .............................................................................................. 5
3.1.Identifyingcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion...................................................53.2Identifyingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityforcasestudies............................63.3Identifyingactionsforaddressingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityforcasestudies.............................................................................................................................................8
4. Project Results ........................................................................................................... 94.1Keyfindingsofcasestudyassessments.......................................................................................94.2Projectproducts.......................................................................................................................104.3Outcomesregardingcapacityandcommunityofpracticebuilding............................................11
5. Lessons Learned ...................................................................................................... 115.1Useofcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.........................................................125.2Takingaconceptualmodelapproach........................................................................................125.3Employingcreativityandflexibilityinaddressingprojectbarriers.............................................13
6. Remaining Needs and Next Steps .......................................................................... 136.1Futureresearchneeds..............................................................................................................136.2Needforongoingcapacitybuilding...........................................................................................136.3Needforcontinuedtransboundaryengagement......................................................................14
7. References ................................................................................................................ 148. Appendices ............................................................................................................... 16
AppendixA:Wolverine..................................................................................................................16AppendixB:MountainGoat...........................................................................................................16AppendixC:White-TailedPtarmigan..............................................................................................16AppendixD:WhitebarkPine..........................................................................................................16AppendixE:CanadaLynx................................................................................................................16AppendixF:AmericanMarten........................................................................................................16AppendixG:BlackBear..................................................................................................................16AppendixH:MuleDeer..................................................................................................................16AppendixI:Lewis’sWoodpecker....................................................................................................16AppendixJ:TigerSalamander........................................................................................................16AppendixK:BullTrout....................................................................................................................16AppendixL:Shrub-Steppe..............................................................................................................16AppendixM:Okanagan-KettleRegion............................................................................................16AppendixN.Summaryofkeyclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsforeachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.......................................................................................................17AppendixO.Datasetsusedtoidentifypotentialclimateimpactsoneachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.......................................................................................................20
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 1
ExecutiveSummaryPlantandanimalspecieshavehistoricallyusedmovementtoadapttochangesintheEarth’sclimate,shiftingtheirrangesacrosslandscapestostaywithinclimaticallysuitablehabitat.Speciesareusingthisstrategytoadapttopresentdayclimatechange,butthecurrentrateofchangeissorapidthatmanyspecieswillhavedifficultykeepingpace.Inaddition,humanlanduse(e.g.,highways,cities,farms)presentssignificantbarrierstowildlifemovementacrosstoday’slandscapes.Forthisreason,enhancinghabitatconnectivity–theabilityofspeciestomoveacrossthelandscape–isaleadingstrategyforhelpingwildliferespondtoclimatechange.Andyet,significantchallengesremainintranslatingthishigh-levelstrategyintospecific,on-the-groundactions.
TheWashington-BritishColumbiaTransboundaryClimate-ConnectivityProjectwasinitiatedtohelpaddressthesechallenges.TheregionspanningtheborderofWashingtonstate,USA,andBritishColumbia,Canada,facesincreasingdevelopmentpressureandlimitedtransboundarycoordinationoflandandwildlifemanagement,bothofwhichmaythreatenhabitatconnectivityandlimitthepotentialforwildlifemovementinresponsetochange.Inaddition,theeffectsofclimatechangemayfurtherreducehabitatconnectivity,andspeciesmayneednoveltypesofhabitatconnectivitytocompleteadaptiverangeshifts.Thisprojectpairedscientistsandpractitionersfrombothsidesofthebordertocollaborativelyidentifypotentialclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsfortransboundaryhabitatconnectivity,usingadiversesuiteofcasestudyspecies,avegetationsystem,andaregion.
Casestudyassessmentsrevealedthatclimatechangeislikelytohavesignificantimplicationsfortransboundaryhabitatconnectivity.Theadaptationactionsidentifiedtoaddresspotentialimpactsvariedbycasestudy,butfellintotwogeneralcategories:thoseaddressingpotentialclimateimpactsonexistinghabitatconnectivityandthoseaddressingnovelhabitatconnectivityneedsforclimate-inducedshiftsinspeciesranges.Inaddition,projectpartnersidentifiedpriorityspatiallocationsforimplementingtheseactions,aswellasadditionalresearchneededtoimproveassessmentofclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsforhabitatconnectivity.
Theprojectresultedinasuiteofproductsdesignedincollaborationwithprojectpartnerstoensuretheirrelevanceandeaseofapplicationtodecision-making.Theseproductsincludethisprojectoverviewreport,whichdescribestheproject’srationale,partnerships,approach,keyfindings,lessonslearned,andremainingneeds;detailed,stand-aloneappendicesforeachcasestudy,whichdescribetheassessmentprocessandkeyfindingsforeach,andincludeallmaterialsusedintheassessment;andaninteractiveprojectgalleryontheonlinemappingplatform,DataBasin,whichincludesprojectreportsandassociatedassessmentmaterials,includinginteractiveanddownloadableconnectivityandclimatedatasets.
Inaddition,projectparticipantsemergedwithenhancedcapacityandatransboundarycommunityofpracticeforaddressingclimatechangeandhabitatconnectivityintheirdecision-making.However,ongoingsupportfortransboundarycapacitybuilding,collaboration,andresearchwillbeneededtopromotethefutureresilienceofoursharedspeciesandecosystems.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 2
1.Introduction AstheEarth’sclimatechanges,speciesarerespondingbyadjustingtheirgeographicdistributions,1movingoutofareasthatbecomeclimaticallyinhospitable,andintoareasthatbecomenewlyhospitable.However,theabilityofspeciestorespondinthiswayislikelytobelimitedbyboththerapidpaceofchangeandwidespreadbarrierstomovementpresentedbyhumanlanduse.Forthisreason,increasingecologicalconnectivity–thedegreetowhichalandscapefacilitatesthemovementofspeciesandecologicalprocesses–isthemostfrequentlyproposedclimateadaptationstrategyforbiodiversityconservation.2Increasingconnectivityisexpectedtoenhanceresiliencetoclimatechangebyhelpingspeciesundergoadaptiverangeshifts,whilealsoreducingexistingstressesassociatedwithhabitatfragmentation.3Despiterecognitionofconnectivityenhancement’svalueasanadaptationstrategy,littleworkhasbeendonetotranslatethisbroadrecommendationintospecific,on-the-groundactionsforconnectivityconservationinachangingclimate.Effectivelymanaginghabitatconnectivitytopromotebiologicalresiliencerequiresknowledgeabouthowclimatechangemayimpactconnectivity,whatadditionalconnectivityneedsspeciesmayhaveastheyundergorangeshifts,andwhatactionscanbetakentoaddresstheseimpactsandneeds.TheWashington-BritishColumbiaTransboundaryClimate-ConnectivityProjectwasinitiatedtopromoteeffectivehabitatconnectivitymanagementunderclimatechangebyaddressingtwoprimarychallenges:thesignificantgapbetweenclimateandconnectivityscienceandpractice;andtheanalytical,political,andphysicalbarrierstoconnectivitypresentedbypoliticalborders.ThetransboundaryregionofWashington,USA,andBritishColumbia,Canada(Fig.1),isanoft-neglectedgeographyamongthepriorityregionsofconservationgroupsandgovernmentagencies,yetmaintainingitspermeabilitytowildlifemovementwillbevitaltomaintainingregionalresiliencetoclimatechange.PreviousworkbytheWashingtonWildlifeHabitatConnectivityWorkingGroup(WHCWG)engagedtransboundarystakeholdersinidentifyinginformationneedsformanaginghabitatconnectivityinachangingclimate.4Theprimaryfindingofthiseffortwasthatnosingleexistingclimateorconnectivitymodeloutputorsynthesisofexistingmodeloutputscouldbestinformconnectivityconservationunderclimatechange,asanymodel’susefulnesswoulddependupontheconnectivitymanagementgoalsandactivitiesoftheuser.Butmorestrikingly,transboundarystakeholders–includinglandandwildlifemanagersfromgovernmentagencies,tribes,andNGOs–madeitclearthattheydidnothavethecapacitytoapplyclimate-relatedmodelstotheirdecision-making.Thissuggestedthatthemosturgentneedwasnotthecreationofnewmodelstoguideconnectivitymanagementinachangingclimate,butratheraconcertedefforttotranslateexistingmodeloutputstomeettheinformationneedsofpractitioners,andtobuildpractitioners’owncapacitytoaccess,interpret,andapplyclimate-relatedmodeloutputstotheirconnectivitymanagementefforts.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 3
Buildingthiscapacitybyassistingpractitionersinidentifyingclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsfortransboundaryhabitatconnectivitywouldpromotemanyregionalandnationalconservationpriorities.Regionally,prioritiesoftheGreatNorthernandNorthPacificLandscapeConservationCooperatives(GNLCCandNPLCC,respectively)includeassessingtheimplicationsofclimatechangeforthemaintenanceoflarge,intact,permeablelandscapes;andfacilitatingcollaborationandadaptationcapacitybuildingtoinformstakeholderdecisions.HabitatconnectivityisapriorityissueoftheGNLCC’sCascadiaPartnerForum,whosemissionistobuild
Figure1.Projectareaandpartnerships:1)AtthescaleoftheWashington-BritishColumbiatransboundaryregion:USForestService(USFS);USNationalParkService(NPS);BCParks;andBCMinistryofForests,Lands,andNaturalResourceOperations(BCFLNRO);2)AtthescaleoftheOkanagan-KettleRegion:theTransboundaryConnectivityWorkingGroup;3)AtthescaleoftheOkanaganNationTerritory:OkanaganNationAlliance(ONA)andColvilleConfederatedTribes(CCT).
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 4
theadaptivecapacityofCascadialandscapes.Atabroaderscale,identifyingandprotectingwildlifecorridorsareprimarygoalsoftheWesternGovernors’Association’sWildlifeCorridorInitiative,andconnectivityenhancementisapriorityclimatechangeadaptationstrategyfortheUSNationalParkService,USForestService,andUSFish&WildlifeService.ItissimilarlyrecognizedasaprioritystrategybyprovincialandfederalministriesinBritishColumbiaandCanada,respectively.TheWashington-BritishColumbiaTransboundaryClimate-ConnectivityProjectthusconvenedscience-practicepartnershipsaimedatpromotingcapacityandcommunityofpracticebuildingamongtransboundarylandandwildlifemanagerstaskedwithmaintainingconnected,resilientlandscapesinachangingclimate.Theobjectiveofthesepartnershipswastoproducepartnership-specificplansformanaginghabitatconnectivityunderclimatechange,by:
1) Identifyingpartner-specificgoalsandobjectivesforhabitatconnectivitymanagement2) Determininghowclimatechangeislikelytoimpactthesegoalsandobjectives,and3) Developingstrategiesandtacticsforaddressingtheseimpacts.
2. Project Partners Weconvenedthreescience-practicepartnershipsreflectingarangeofmanagementgoals,activities,andscalesrelatedtohabitatconnectivity.TheprojectareaspannedthetransboundaryregionofWashingtonState,USA,andBritishColumbia,Canada,withpartnershipsestablishedatthreespatialscales(Fig.1):
• TheWashington-BritishColumbiaTransboundaryRegion.PartnersincludedtheUSForestService;USNationalParkService;BCParks;andBCMinistryofForests,Lands,andNaturalResourceOperations
• TheOkanagan-KettleRegion:PartnersincludedtheTransboundaryConnectivityGroup(i.e.,WHCWGanditsBCpartners).
• OkanaganNationTerritory:PartnersincludedtheOkanaganNationAllianceanditsmemberbandsandtribes,includingtheColvilleConfederatedTribes.
Forallpartnerships,sciencepartnersincludedtheClimateImpactsGroupattheUniversityofWashingtonandthePacificClimateImpactsConsortiumattheUniversityofVictoria.Together,thescience-practicepartnershipsengagedinacollaborative,iterativeassessmentofclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsfortransboundaryhabitatconnectivity.Thisco-productiveassessmentprocesswasdesignedtopromotecapacityandcommunityofpracticebuildingamongpractitionerpartnerswhileensuringthatprojectproductsweredirectlyrelevantandimmediatelyapplicabletopractitioners’decision-making.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 5
3. Assessment ApproachTheassessmentapproachoutlinedinouroriginalprojectdesignconsistedofidentifyingpartner-specificgoalsandobjectivesforhabitatconnectivitymanagement,determininghowclimatechangeislikelytoimpactthesegoalsandobjectives,anddevelopingadaptationactionsforaddressingtheseimpacts.However,asdescribedbelow,projectpartnersultimatelymodifiedthisplaninresponsetotheopportunitiesandconstraintspresentedbyalarge,transboundary,inter-institutionalproject.Thefinalassessmentapproachentailed:1)focusingtheassessmentonasuiteofcasestudies,includingnumerousspecies,avegetationsystem,andaregion;2)identifyingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityforeachcasestudy;and3)developingpartner-specificactionsforaddressingtheseimpacts.3.1.Identifyingcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion
Projectpartnersengagedinaseriesofinitialworkshopsandphonecallstointroducepractitionerpartnerstotheproject,developandbuildbuy-inaroundtheassessmentapproach,andgainasharedunderstandingofpractitionerpartners’goalsandobjectivesforconnectivitymanagement.Whiletheoriginalprojectdesigncalledforasingleinitialworkshop,difficultyarranginginternationaltravelforpractitionerpartners(particularlyUSfederalemployees)madeitimpossibletoconveneallpartnerssimultaneouslyatthestartoftheproject.Wethereforeheldaseriesofsmallerworkshopsandphonecallsarrangedatpractitionerpartners’convenience,toencourageparticipationbythoseunabletotravelacrosstheborder.Theinformationgatheredattheseinitialworkshopsandphonecallsprovidedsciencepartnerswithanunderstandingoftheconnectivity-andclimate-relatedmanagementgoals,activities,andcapacitiesofpractitionerpartners.Italsorevealedastrongneedtofocustheworkofthepartnershipsaroundalimitednumberofspecificconnectivityconservationtargets.Addressingtheextensiveanddiverseconnectivityandclimate-relatedinformationneedsofeachindividualpartnerwaswellbeyondtheproject’scapacity,andwouldnothavecontributedtotheproject’sgoalofpromotingatransboundarycommunityofpracticeviapartnercollaboration.Projectpartnersthuscollectivelyagreedtofocustheirassessmentonasuiteoftransboundarycasestudiesspanningarangeoforganizationalscales,includingnumerousindividualspecies,avegetationsystem,andaregion(Table1).Thecasestudyspecies,system,andregionwerenotintendedtoactasconnectivityconservationumbrellasforthetransboundaryregion’sbroaderbiota,astheindividualisticnatureofspecies’responsestoclimatechangeprecludestraditionalumbrellaapproachestoconservationplanning.Rather,theywereselectedbasedontheirsharedprioritystatusamongprojectpartners,representationofdiversehabitattypesandclimatesensitivities,anddataavailability.Theseselectioncriteriawerechosentopromotetransboundaryandinter-institutionalcollaborationaroundsharedconservationpriorities,whilegivingpartnerstheopportunitytoexplorearangeofclimateandmovementsensitivities,relevantdatasets,andadaptationactions.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 6
Table 1. Case study species, vegetation system, and region selected for assessment by project partners. Species CommonName ScientificNameWolverine GuloguloMountaingoat OreamnosamericanusWhite-tailedptarmigan LagopusleucuraWhitebarkpine PinusalbicaulisCanadalynx LynxcanadensisAmericanmarten MartescaurinaBlackbear UrsusamericanusMuledeer OdocoileushemionusLewis'swoodpecker MelanerpeslewisTigersalamander AmbystomatigrinumBulltrout SalvelinusconfluentusVegetationSystem Shrub-Steppe Region Okanagan-KettleRegion
3.2Identifyingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityforcasestudies
Toidentifypotentialclimateimpactsontransboundaryhabitatconnectivity,projectpartnerscreatedconceptualmodelsthatidentifiedthekeylandscapefeaturesandprocessesexpectedtoinfluencehabitatconnectivityforeachcasestudyspeciesandsystem,whichofthoseareexpectedtobeinfluencedbyclimate,andhow.Simplifyingcomplexecologicalsystemsinsuchawaycanmakeiteasiertoidentifyspecificclimateimpactsandadaptationactions.Forthisreason,conceptualmodelshavebeenpromotedasusefuladaptationtools,andhavebeenappliedinavarietyofothersystems.5Conceptualmodelspreparedbyprojectpartners(Fig.2)werebasedonparticipantexpertise;peer-reviewedarticlesandreports;and,whenpossible,reviewbyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregionalexperts.Thatsaid,thesemodelswereintentionallysimplifiedandnotintendedtorepresentcomprehensiveassessmentsofthefullsuiteoflandscapefeaturesandprocessescontributingtohabitatconnectivity.Projectparticipantsusedconceptualmodelstogetherwithmodelsofprojectedfuturechangesinspeciesdistributions,vegetationcommunities,andrelevantclimatevariablestoidentifypotentialimpactsonhabitatconnectivityforeachcasestudy.Partnersdidthisbyevaluatingprojectedfuturechangesforeachclimatevariableincludedinthemodel,andhowthesechangeswerelikelytoaffectthelandscapefeaturesandprocessesimportanttohabitatconnectivity.Becauseakeyprojectgoalwastoincreasepractitionerpartners’capacitytoaccess,interpret,andapplyexistingclimateandconnectivitymodeloutputstotheirdecision-making,wereliedonafewprimarydatasetsthatarefreelyavailable,spanallorpartofthetransboundaryregion,andreflecttheexpertiseofprojectsciencepartners.ThesesourcesincludedhabitatconnectivitymodelsproducedbytheWashingtonConnectedLandscapesProject,6,7,8futureclimateprojectionsproducedbytheIntegratedScenariosoftheFuture
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 7
Northwest9andthePacificClimateImpactsConsortium’sRegionalAnalysisTool,10andmodelsofprojectedrangeshiftsandvegetationchangeproducedbythePacificNorthwestClimateChangeVulnerabilityAssessment.11
WolverineConnectivity
Dispersal Habitat:
Generalist (mid to low elevation
habitats)
Core Habitat:Alpine,
Subalpine ForestsSnags / Coarse
Woody Debris
* Snowpack (deep, persistent to late spring)Length of Snow Season, Snow
Depth, April and May Snow Levels
Tree Cover
ClimateTemperature
and Precipitation
Pests and Pathogens
Fire
Residential and Industrial Development
Summer Water Deficit
KeyPositively correlated
Negatively correlated
Effect
Human Activity
Landscape Feature
Natural Process
Towns/Dwellings
Agricultural Fields
Forest management
Agricultural Management
Timber Cuts
* Critical Feature/Process
Steep Terrain
Talus
Current human useCurrent human use
Small damsEnergy Development
Back-country Recreation
* RoadsRoad Management
MinesMine management
Figure2.Exampleconceptualmodelofhabitatconnectivity:Wolverine.Conceptualmodelsillustratetherelationshipsbetweenthekeylandscapefeatures(whiteboxes),ecologicalprocesses(purpleboxes),andhumanactivities(blueboxes)thatinfluencethequalityandpermeabilityofcorehabitatanddispersalhabitatforagivenspecies.Climaticvariablesforwhichdataonprojectedchangesareavailableareoutlinedinyellow.Greenlinesandarrowsindicateapositivecorrelationbetweenlinkedvariables(i.e.,asvariablexincreasesvariableyincreases),butnotethatapositivecorrelationisnotnecessarilybeneficialtothespecies.Orangelinesandarrowsindicateanegativerelationshipbetweenvariables(i.e.,asvariablexincreases,variableydecreases);negativecorrelationsarenotnecessarilyharmfultothespecies.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 8
3.3Identifyingactionsforaddressingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityforcasestudies
Afteridentifyingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivity,projectparticipantsusedconceptualmodelstoidentifywhichrelevantlandscapefeaturesorprocessescouldbeaffectedbymanagementactivities,andsubsequentlywhatactionscouldbetakentoaddressprojectedclimateimpactsforeachspecies(Fig.3).Partnersdidthisbyconsideringthemanagementactivitiesidentifiedintheconceptualmodels,andhowspecificactivitiescouldaddresspotentialclimateimpactsonlandscapefeaturesorprocessesimportanttohabitatconnectivity.Adaptationactionsidentifiedbythisapproachaddressedseveraldistinctcategoriesofimpactsandresponses,includingpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivity,novelhabitatconnectivityneedsforpromotingclimate-inducedshiftsinspeciesdistributions,andspatialprioritiesforimplementation.Itshouldbenotedthatonepartnershipdidnotuseaconceptualmodelapproach,becausetheirconnectivitygoalsandobjectiveswerespecificandsimpleenoughthatitwasnotrequired.TheTransboundaryConnectivityGroup’sgoalwastoidentifypotentialclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsforheavilyfragmentedvalleyfloorswithintheOkanagan-Kettleregion(Fig.1),withanemphasisonconnectivitypriorityareasidentifiedinarecentassessment.12Participantsinthispartnershipreviewedprojectedchangesinvegetationandrelevantclimaticvariablestoidentifypotentialimpactsonthesevalleyfloorsandpriorityconnectivityareas,andthendevelopedactionsforaddressingtheseimpactsandfacilitatingspeciesrangeshifts.
Figure3.Science-practicepartnersataprojectworkshop.Here,partnersuseconceptualmodelsofhabitatconnectivitytogetherwithmodelsofprojectedchangesinclimatetoidentifypotentialimpactsonhabitatconnectivity,andactionsforaddressingtheseimpacts.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 9
4. Project Results 4.1Keyfindingsofcasestudyassessments
Projectpartnersidentifiedawiderangeofpotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityinthetransboundaryregion,andasimilarlydiversesetofadaptationresponses.DetaileddescriptionsofimpactsandactionsforeachcasestudycanbefoundinAppendicesA-M,asummarylistofkeyclimateimpactsandadaptationactionscanbefoundinAppendixN,andalistofthedatasetsusedtoidentifypotentialclimateimpactsforeachcasestudycanbefoundinAppendixO(seeSection8,below).TheclimateimpactsidentifiedinthecasestudieswereinmanywayssimilarwhatwouldbefoundinageneralclimatechangevulnerabilityassessmentforNorthwestspeciesandecosystems(e.g.,decliningsnowpack,increasingriskofwildlife,warmingstreamtemperatures).Whatdistinguishedthisassessmentwasitsfocusonhowtheseimpactswouldaffecthabitatconnectivity:wouldprojectedchangesinclimaticvariablesmakeexistingcorehabitatareasanddispersalcorridorsmoreorlesspermeabletowildlifemovement?Wouldprojectedchangesinareasofclimaticsuitabilityresultincorehabitatareasbecomingmoreorlessfragmentedorisolated?Wouldaspeciesneedtosignificantlymodifyitsrangetoreachprojectedfutureareasofclimaticsuitability?Similarly,manyresponseactionsresembledwhatwouldbefoundinaregionaladaptationplanforspeciesandecosystems(e.g.,employprescribedburningtoreduceriskofseverewildfires),butwerefocusedspecificallyonreducingriskstohabitatconnectivity(e.g.,implementprescribedburnstomaintainthequalityandpermeabilityofcorehabitatareasanddispersalcorridors)andprovidingtheadditionaltypesofhabitatconnectivitythatmayberequiredtoaccommodatespeciesrangeshifts(e.g.,identifyandprotectcorridorsthatfallalongclimaticgradients,orthatconnectcorehabitatareasofdecliningclimaticsuitabilitytoareasofprojectedstableorincreasingsuitability).Formostcasestudyassessments,climatechangewasfoundtohavesignificantimplicationsforhabitatconnectivity.Anticipateddeclinesinhabitatconnectivitywereduetobothpotentialclimateimpactsonexistingcorehabitatareasandcorridors(e.g.,decliningblackbearhabitatconnectivityduetoprojectedincreasesinwildfireriskanddryingofmoistcorridorsspanninglowelevationvalleys)and/orchangesinareasofclimaticsuitability(e.g.,decliningwolverinehabitatconnectivityduetoshrinkingcorehabitatareaswhichbecomeincreasinglyfragmentedandisolated).Forsomecasestudytargets,projectedchangesinareasofclimaticsuitabilitysuggestednolossorevenincreasesinclimaticallysuitablehabitatwithinthetransboundaryregion(e.g.,tigersalamanderandmuledeer).However,forsuchspeciespotentialclimateimpactsonfine-scaledhabitatfeaturescouldhavenegativeimpactsonhabitatconnectivitywithinareasoffutureclimaticsuitability(e.g.,impactsonindividualtigersalamanderbreedingpondsduetorisingtemperaturesandchangesinhydrology;lossofwaterresourcesformuledeerinwarm,dry,lowelevationcorridors).Theadaptationactionsidentifiedtoaddresspotentialimpactsvariedbycasestudy,butfellintotwogeneralcategories:thoseaddressingpotentialclimateimpactsonexistinghabitat
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 10
connectivityandthoseaddressingnovelhabitatconnectivityneedsforclimate-inducedshiftsinspeciesranges.Actionstoaddresspotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityincludedarangeofadaptationresponsestomaintainthequalityandpermeabilityofcorehabitatareasanddispersalcorridors,fromprescribedburningtoinvasivespeciescontroltoriparianrestoration.Actionsaimedatpromotingclimate-inducedrangeshiftsincluded:maintainingandrestoringcorridorsbetweenareasofdecliningclimaticsuitabilityandareasofstabilityorincreasingsuitability;maintainingandrestoringcorridorsthatspanelevationgradients(e.g.,climategradientcorridors7),toensurethatspecieshavetheabilitytodisperseintocoolerhabitatsastheclimatewarms;andmaintainingandrestoringriparianareas,whichspanclimaticgradientsandareusedasmovementcorridorsbymanyspecies.Projectpartnersalsoidentifiedpriorityspatiallocationsforimplementingtheseactions.Spatialpriorityareasforimplementationofadaptationactionsincludedlowelevationvalleys(e.g.,theOkanaganValleyandFraserRiverValley),whichcurrentlypresentmajorbarrierstowildlifemovementandcouldconstrainclimate-inducedrangeshifts,particularlyforhigh-elevationspecies;majorhighways,particularlythosethatrunalonglowelevationvalleys(e.g.,BCHighway97throughtheOkanaganValley)andtraversetheCascades(e.g.,BCHighway3throughE.C.ManningProvincialPark);areasofcurrentandprojectedfutureclimaticsuitabilityforcasestudyspecies;andcorridorsthatfallalongclimaticgradients(e.g.,climategradientcorridors7).Policy-relatedactionswerealsoidentifiedthatspannedeachoftheabovecategories;manyofthesefocusedontheneedtoconsiderhabitatconnectivityandclimatechangeacrossarangeofmanagementcontexts(particularlylandandwatermanagementandtransportationplanning),andtocoordinateacrossinstitutionsandjurisdictions(includinggovernments,tribesandFirstNations,NGOs,andparticularlyprivatelandowners).Finally,thecasestudyassessmentsidentifiedadditionalresearchthatcouldhelptoimproveidentificationandresponsetopotentialclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivity.Severalprimaryresearchneedswereevidentacrosscasestudies,includingresearchaimedatimprovingunderstandingofspecies’movementandhabitatconnectivity(e.g.,additionalempiricalstudiesofspeciesmovementanddispersal,andadditionalhabitatconnectivitymodelsforspeciesthatlackthem);transboundarymodelsofprojectedchangesinrelevantclimaticvariablesandimpacts(e.g.,riskofwildfireandinsectoutbreaks);andmodelsthatcouldimprovethespatialspecificityofpriorityareasforimplementationofadaptationactionsandconnectivityconservationefforts(e.g.,modelsthatidentifycorridorsbetweenprojectedareasofdecliningclimaticsuitabilityandareasofstableorincreasingsuitability).4.2Projectproducts
Projectproductsweredesignedincollaborationwithpractitionerpartnerstoensuretheirrelevanceandeaseofapplicationtodecision-making.Theseproductsinclude:
• Thisoverviewreport,whichdescribestheproject’srationale,partnerships,approach,andkeyfindings.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 11
• Additionalreportsdescribingkeyfindingsforeachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.Thesereportsareprovidedasappendicestothisoverviewreport,andareintendedtoactasstand-aloneresources;theyincludesummarydescriptionsoftheprojectandassessmentprocess,keyfindings,andallmaterialsusedtoidentifypotentialclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsforeachcasestudy(e.g.,conceptualmodels,habitatconnectivitymodels,andmodelsofprojectedfuturechangesinspeciesdistributions,vegetationcommunities,andclimatevariables).Formoreinformationonthesereports,seeSection8:Appendices.
• AninteractiveprojectgalleryontheonlinemappingplatformDataBasin.Thisprojectgalleryincludesallprojectreportsandassociatedassessmentmaterials,includinginteractiveanddownloadableconnectivityandclimatedatasets.Thisgallerycanbefoundat:
https://nplcc.databasin.org/galleries/5a3a424b36ba4b63b10b8170ea0c915e4.3Outcomesregardingcapacityandcommunityofpracticebuilding
Oneofthemostimportantoutcomesofthisprojectwastheenhancedcapacityandcommunityofpracticeitfosteredinbothitspractitionerandsciencepartners.Practitionerpartnersgainedsignificanthands-onexperienceaccessing,interpreting,andapplyingclimateandconnectivitymodelstotheirdecision-making(Figs.3-4).Inaddition,theprojectofferedpractitionersatransferableprocessforhowtoevaluateandaddressclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivity.Finally,practitionerpartnersuniversallyexpressedtheirappreciationfortheopportunitytocollaboratewiththeircounterpartsacrosstheborder.Forsciencepartners,theprojectofferedvaluablelessonsinhowtonavigatethemanybarriersposedbypoliticalborders,fromtheanalytical(e.g.,howtoapplydisparatedatasetsthatoftendidnotcrosstheborder)tothelogistical(e.g.,howtoeffectivelyengageinknowledgeco-productionwithadiverse,transboundarygroupofpractitioners).Italsopromotedtheirowncommunityofpractice;theClimateImpactsGroupandPacificClimateImpactsConsortiumhadhadrelativelylittleinteractionbeforethisproject,despitedoingverysimilarwork.Ultimately,theproject’sintangibleproducts–fromcapacitybuildingtotheemergenceofatransboundarycommunityofpracticearoundconnectivitymanagementinachangingclimate–wereatleastasvaluableasitsmoreconcretedeliverables.
5. Lessons Learned Workingacrossborderswithdiversepartnerstoincorporateclimatechangeintothemanagementofhabitatconnectivityyieldedseveralvaluablelessons.Inparticular,thesuccessoftheprojecthadmuchtodowithprojectpartners’adoptionofacasestudyandconceptualmodelapproach,andtheabilitytorespondcreativelyandflexiblyastransboundaryandinstitutionalbarrierswereencountered.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 12
5.1Useofcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion
Employingacasestudyapproachwasnotintheoriginalprojectdesign,yetdoingsoprovedcriticaltotheproject’ssuccessforseveralreasons.First,focusingassessmentsonsharedconservationprioritieswaskeytomeetingtheprojectgoalofpromotingcollaborationandcreatingacommunityofpracticeamongdisparatetransboundary,inter-institutionalpartners.Acasestudyapproachwasalsomorelogisticallyandanalyticallyefficientthanfocusingoneachindividualpartner’sinformationneeds,makingthemostoftheproject’slimitedcapacity.Focusingonspecificcasestudiesalsohelpedfacilitatethetranslationofahigh-leveladaptationstrategy(habitatconnectivityenhancement)intospecific,concreteactions.Finally,ourassessmentofcasestudiesacrossarangeoforganizationalscales–fromindividualspecies,toavegetationsystem,toageographicregion–demonstratedtheapplicabilityofthisapproachtodiversemanagementtargets.5.2Takingaconceptualmodelapproach
Muchliketheuseofcasestudies,theuseofconceptualmodelswasnotinouroriginalprojectdesign,butprovedkeytotheproject’ssuccess.Inparticular,conceptualmodelswerevitaltoovercomingthechallengeoftranslatingahigh-leveladaptationstrategyintospecific,on-the-groundactions.Bysimplifyingtheabstractconceptofhabitatconnectivityintoitskeyphysicalcomponentsforeachcasestudy,bothscienceandpractitionerpartnerswerebetterabletoconsiderwhichlandscapefeaturesandprocessescontributingtohabitatconnectivitywerelikelytobeinfluencedbyclimate,howspecificclimatedatasetscouldbeusedtoidentifypotentialclimateimpacts,andhowhabitatconnectivitymodeloutputsandotherdatasetscouldhelppractitionersidentifywhereandhowtheycouldintervenetoaddressthoseimpacts.Inshort,theconceptualmodelapproachmadeaninitiallyvaguetask(i.e.,adapthabitatconnectivitymanagementtoclimatechange)concreteandtractable,andyieldedspecific,usefulresults.
Figure4.Science-practicepartnersataprojectworkshop.Here,partnersareengagedinahands-ontrainingintheuseoftheonlinemappingplatform,DataBasin,toaccessandinteractwithprojectproductsandexploreapplicationstodecision-making.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 13
5.3Employingcreativityandflexibilityinaddressingprojectbarriers
Wefoundthatcreativityandflexibilitywerekeytoovercomingthesignificantbarrierspresentedbyalarge,transboundaryprojectwithdiversepartners.Forexample,traveltoworkshopsturnedouttobeasignificantbarriertopractitionerpartnerinvolvement,particularlyforUSfederalemployeesneedingtocrosstheborderintoCanada.Werespondedbysupplementingtheinitialworkshopwithnumerousphonecallsandmeetingsheldatpractitioners’offices,andbyultimatelyconveninganadditionalworkshopatPeaceArchParkattheInterstate5bordercrossingbetweenWashingtonandBritishColumbia;entrancetointernationalpeaceparksdoesnotrequireapassport,circumventinginstitutionalrestrictionsaroundinternationaltravel.Creativityandflexibilitywerealsovitaltoaccommodatingthevaryinglevelsofengagementpossibleamongpractitionerpartners.Whilesomepractitionerpartnerswereabletoparticipatesteadilythroughouttheproject,manyindividualsflowedinandoutoverthecourseoftheproject,orwereonlyabletoparticipatetolesserdegrees(e.g.,attendingwebinarsbutnotworkshops).Providingfrequentanddiverseopportunitiesforengagementandencouragingindividualstoparticipatewhenavailablecontributedtoahigherlevelofpractitionerparticipationthanifwehadadheredtotheoriginalprojectdesign.Thatsaid,thisapproachrequiredsignificantlymoretimeandresources–particularlyforsciencepartners–thantheoriginalprojectdesignoftwoworkshopsandtwowebinars.
6. Remaining Needs and Next Steps 6.1Futureresearchneeds
Casestudyassessmentsrevealedseveralareaswherefutureresearchcouldhelpimprovepractitioners’abilitytoidentifyandaddressclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivity.Mostimportantly,assessmentsrevealedasignificantneedforthedevelopmentoftransboundarymodelsofbothhabitatconnectivity(whichwereunavailableformanyspecies)andprojectedchangesinclimatevariables(e.g.,snowpack,riskofwildfireandinsectoutbreaks).Assessmentsalsoindicatedaneedforadditionalempiricalresearchonwildlifemovementandrangeshifts,bothtovalidateexistinghabitatconnectivityandrangeshiftmodelsandtoinformthedevelopmentofnewmodels.Finally,assessmentsshowedthatadditionalresearchisneededtoimprovethespatialspecificityofclimateimpactsonhabitatconnectivityandpriorityareasforadaptationactions,fromsimpleGISoverlaysofclimateimpactsandexistingconnectivitymodels,tosophisticatedmodelingidentifyingpotentialcorridorsbetweencurrentandfutureareasofclimaticsuitability.6.2Needforongoingcapacitybuilding
Feedbackfromprojectpartnerssuggeststhatthereissignificantneedforandinterestinongoingeffortstobuildpractitioners’capacitytoaccess,interpret,andapplyclimateandconnectivitydatasetstotheirdecision-making.Hands-on,experientiallearninginvolvingbothscientistsandpractitionersisparticularlyeffectiveatbuildingsuchcapacity;however,sucheffortsaretime-andresource-intensiveforparticipants.Futureinnovationandinvestmentin
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 14
scaling-upsuchcapacitybuilding(e.g.,ongoingworkshops,webinars,andtrainingsorlarge-scaleco-productionefforts)aregreatlyneeded.6.3Needforcontinuedtransboundaryengagement
Effectivelymanaginghabitatconnectivityinachangingclimatewillrequireongoingtransboundaryengagementofscientistsandpractitionerstoensurethatlandandwildlifemanagementiscoordinatedacrosstheborderandinformedbythebestavailablescience.Whilenumerousmechanismsareinplacetoensurecoordinatedmanagementoftransboundaryaquaticspeciesandresources,fewframeworksexistforpromotingsuchengagementaroundterrestrialspeciesandecosystems.Thereisalsoneedforadditionalfundingstreamsspecificallydirectedtowardcollaborativeresearchamongtransboundaryscientists,inordertomeettheneedforclimateandconnectivitymodelsthatseamlesslyspantheborder,andtopromotescientificengagementintransboundaryadaptationprocesses.Fundingandinstitutionsthatsupporttransboundaryengagementamongscientistsandpractitionerswillbekeytomaintainingaconnected,resilienttransboundaryregionastheclimatechanges.
7. References1.Chen,I.C.,Hill,J.K.,Ohlemuller,R.,Roy,D.B.,andC.D.Thomas.2011.Rapidrangeshiftsofspeciesassociatedwithhighlevelsofclimatewarming.Science333:1024-1026
2.Heller,N.E.,andE.S.Zavaleta.2009.Biodiversitymanagementinthefaceofclimatechange:Areviewof22yearsofrecommendations.BiologicalConservation142:14-32.
3.Krosby,M.,Tewksbury,J.,Haddad,N.,andJ.Hoekstra.2010.Ecologicalconnectivityforachangingclimate.ConservationBiology24:1686-1689.
4.WHCWG(WashingtonWildlifeHabitatConnectivityWorkingGroup).2013.WashingtonConnectedLandscapesProject:BritishColumbia–WashingtonTransboundaryHabitatConnectivityScopingReport.WashingtonDepartmentsofFishandWildlife,andTransportation,Olympia,WA.
5.Cross,M.S.,etal.2012.TheAdaptationforConservationTargets(ACT)framework:atoolforincorporatingclimatechangeintonaturalresourcemanagement.EnvironmentalManagement50:341–351.
6.WashingtonWildlifeHabitatConnectivityWorkingGroup.2010.WashingtonConnectedLandscapesProject:StatewideAnalysis.WashingtonDepartmentsofFishandWildlife,andTransportation,Olympia,WA.www.waconnected.org.
7.WashingtonWildlifeHabitatConnectivityWorkingGroup.2011.WashingtonConnectedLandscapesProject:Climategradientcorridorsreport.WashingtonDepartmentsofFishandWildlife,andTransportation.Olympia,WA.www.waconnected.org.
8.WashingtonWildlifeHabitatConnectivityWorkingGroup.2012.WashingtonConnectedLandscapesProject:AnalysisoftheColumbiaPlateauEcoregion.Washington’sDepartmentofFishandWildlife,andDepartmentofTransportation,Olympia,WA.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 15
9.IntegratedScenariosoftheFutureNorthwestEnvironment.http://climate.nkn.uidaho.edu/IntegratedScenarios
10.PacificClimateImpactsConsortium(PCIC),RegionalAnalysisTool.2014.https://www.pacificclimate.org/analysis-tools/regional-analysis-tool
11.PacificNorthwestClimateChangeVulnerabilityAssessment(PNWCCVA).http://www.climatevulnerability.org/
12.TransboundaryConnectivityGroup.2016.ProvidingaRegionalConnectivityPerspectivetoLocalConnectivityConservationDecisionsintheBritishColumbia–WashingtonTransboundaryRegion:Okanagan-KettleSubregionConnectivityAssessment.Availableat:http://waconnected.org.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 16
8. Appendices Appendicestothisreportdescribethekeyclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsidentifiedforeachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregionassessedbyprojectpartners.Afirstsetofappendicesdescribesindividualcasestudyassessments,includingtheapproachtaken,keyfindings,andallmaterialsanddatasetsusedintheassessment.Theseappendicesinclude:
AppendixA:WolverineAppendixB:MountainGoatAppendixC:White-TailedPtarmiganAppendixD:WhitebarkPineAppendixE:CanadaLynxAppendixF:AmericanMartenAppendixG:BlackBearAppendixH:MuleDeerAppendixI:Lewis’sWoodpeckerAppendixJ:TigerSalamanderAppendixK:BullTroutAppendixL:Shrub-SteppeAppendixM:Okanagan-KettleRegion
Theseappendiceshavebeenpreparedasstand-alonedocuments;theyandtheirassociateddatasetsandmetadatacanbeaccessedontheonlinemappingplatform,DataBasin,freelyavailableat:https://nplcc.databasin.org/galleries/5a3a424b36ba4b63b10b8170ea0c915eTwoadditionalappendicessummarizefindingsacrosscasestudies,andareavailablewithinthisoverviewreport.Theseappendicesinclude:
AppendixN.Summaryofkeyclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsforeachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.AppendixO.Datasetsusedtoidentifypotentialclimateimpactsoneachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 17
AppendixN.Summaryofkeyclimateimpactsandadaptationactionsforeachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.
Climateimpact(s)addressed ADAPTATIONACTION
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Restoringand/orprotectingriparianvegetationtoshadeponds,whichwouldreducewatertemperaturesandevaporationrates. x xExcludingcattlefrompondsandsurroundingvegetation(e.g.,byinstallingfencing),andusingtechniques(e.g.,fabricandgravelinstallation)topreventcattlefromleavingpockmarks,whichreducepondquality. x x
Protectingand/orreintroducingbeaversintowatersheds,whichmayimprovewetlandqualityandconnectivity. x x xWideningpondstoincreaseaccessforsalamandersand/ordeepeningpondstoincreasepondpersistenceintosummer. x xAddingwaterandremovingpredatoryfishfromkeyponds(highlyresourceintensive;anemergencymeasure). x xIffrostsealdoesnotoccuroftenenoughtomaintainspringwetlands,consideringartificiallyirrigatingkeywetlands. x xEstablishingretentionpondsinurbanareas,andtreatingthemasmanagedwetlands. x xDivertingrainwaterintoexistingponds(whileaddressingpotentialforchemicalrun-offandturbidityissues). x xManagingaccessincorehabitatareasandcorridors(especiallythoseprojectedtomaintainclimaticsuitability)toreduceimpactsfromrecreation,grazing,andotheruses. x x x x x xMonitoringchangesinthetimingandintensityofrecreationandotheractivities,particularlywithincorehabitatareasandmovementcorridors. x x x
Climateimpact(s)addressed ADAPTATIONACTION
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Maintainingandrestoringcorridorsbetweenareasofdecliningclimaticsuitabilityandareasofstabilityorincreasingsuitability. x x x x x x x xEvaluatingtherisksandbenefitsofmanuallytransportingspeciestoareasofprojectedstableorincreasingclimaticsuitability. x x xMaintainingandrestoringcorridorsthatspanelevationgradients(e.g.,climategradientcorridors),toensurethatspecieshavetheabilitytodisperseintocoolerhabitatsastheclimatewarms. x x x x x x x x x x x xMaintainingandrestoringriparianareas,whichspanclimaticgradientsandareusedasmovementcorridorsbymanyspecies. x x x x x xPlanningtheplacement,orientation,andshapeofreservepatchestomaximizeconnectivity,spanclimaticgradients,andcrosslow-elevationvalleys. x x x
Geographicshiftsinspeciesranges
Decliningwateravailabilityandqualityforponds/wetlands
Changesinthetiming,location,andintensityofhumanactivities
CaseStudyII.EnhancingConnectivitytoFacilitateRangeShifts
Climateimpact(s)addressed ADAPTATIONACTION
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Usingprescribedburns,thinning,andtargetedfuelreductiontoreducetheriskofcatastrophicwildfires. x x x x x x x x x xIncorporatingprojectionsandobservationsofclimaticchanges(e.g.,earlieronsetoffireseason)toinformthetimingoffirepreventiontechniquesasconditionschange,inordertomaximizesafetyandeffectiveness x x x x x x x
Usingsomedegreeoffiresuppressionincool,moistforestswithlongfirereturnintervals. x xReferencingtheforestandgrazingpracticesoftribesandFirstNationstoidentifytraditionalstrategiesformanagingfirerisk. x x x x xIncreasingsnowdepthlocally(e.g.,viasnowfences),recognizingthatlocal-scalesnowmanagementisunlikelytohaveasignificantimpactonhabitatconnectivity.Therefore,prioritizesucheffortswithinimportantcorehabitatareasandcorridors. x x xEnsuringthatsnowpackretentionpracticesarecompatiblewithotherforestmanagementpracticesthatbalancetheneedforfireandnaturalresourcemanagementwiththeneedforsufficienthorizontalcover. x xIdentifyingandprioritizingareaswheredeepspringsnowpackismostlikelytopersistinthefuture(e.g.,north-facingslopsandcanyons). x x xMonitoringandrespondingtochangesinvegetation(e.g.,shiftsintreeline,transitionofshrub-steppetoothervegetationtypes,lossofforestedcorridorsinlowelevationvalleys)thatmayaffecthabitatconnectivity.ConsideruseofLIDARremotesensingandothertechnologiesyieldinghighresolutiondata.
x x x x x x x x x
Minimizingforest(ornon-targettree)encroachmentinkeycorehabitatareasandcorridorsbymechanicallyremovinginvadingtreesorusingprescribedburnstoreducetreerecruitment. x x x
Developingplantingplansthatevaluateandpotentiallyincludegenotypesadaptedtoprojectedfutureclimaticconditions x xIncorporateinvasivespeciesmanagementintoallactivitiesrelatedtohabitatconnectivityconservation. x xInareasheavilyinvadedbycheatgrass,consideringprescribedburningincombinationwithherbicideandnativeplantreseeding. x xIdentifyingandprotectingstandsthatarelargeenoughtoattractseeddispersersandserveasaseedsource xIdentifyingandprotectingstandsthatcouldserveaslinksorsteppingstonesforseeddispersersmovingamonglargerstands xRestoringriparianvegetation,whichwillhelpshadestreamsandreducestreamtemperatures. x xExcludingcattlefromriparianareastopreventlossofvegetativecover. x xInvestigatethefeasibilityandbenefitofmanuallytransportingfisharoundthermalbarriersinstreams. xManagingforeststomaximizegroundwaterinfiltration. xUsingdamreleaseeventstomaintainwaterlevelsandstreamtemperaturesadequateforfishpassage. xIdentifyingandmitigatingbarrierssuchasdamsorpoorlydesignedroadcrossingsorculvertstopromotefishpassage. x
Changesinvegetation
Changesininvasivespecies
Changesinseeddispersal
CaseStudy
Increasingriskofwildfire
Increasingstreamtemperatures
Decreasingsummerstreamflows
I.AddressingClimateImpactsonHabitatConnectivity
Decreasingsnowpackdepthandduration
x
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 18
TOPICADDRESSED ADAPTATIONACTION
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Limitingthedevelopmentofforestryactivitiesathighelevations(particularlythoselikelytoremainclimaticallysuitable). xManagingforestryactivitiestoensurethatforestcanopycoverremainscontinuousthroughoutcorridorsformontaneforestspecies,andthatlargetrees,oldsnags,andtreecavitiesremainpresent. x x
Reviewingandimplementingexistingguidanceandplansrelatingtospecieshabitatmanagement,modifyingtoaddressclimate. x x x x x x x xInvestigatingwhetherhavingmultiplepriorityspeciesaffectedinthesameareacouldleadtogreaterpressuretochangemanagementpracticesifcumulativeimpactscanbedemonstrated. x x x x x
Coordinatingstewardshipandmanagementactivitieswithgovernments,NGOs,tribesandFirstNations,andprivatelandowners. x x x x x x x xPlacinglimitationsonproposalssothattheyenhanceconservationmeasures(e.g.,requirebuffers).
Strivingforcommunitydesignthatlimitfragmentationofhabitatandincludehabitatcorridors. x xIdentifyingandprotectingwetlandsandotherwatersourcesinvalleys.Thesemayhelptopromotemovementofmontaneforestspeciesthroughdry,low-elevationvalleys,whilealsopromotingcorehabitatareaandcorridorqualityforlow-elevationspecies. x x x x
Securingwaterrightstomaintainmoistureinriparianareasandwetlandsthatprovidecorehabitatandmovementcorridors. x x x x x x xCarefullyreviewingwaterpermitrequestsfornewirrigationwithdrawalstoensurethatkeyponds,wetlands,andwaterresourcesremainavailablewithincorehabitatareasanddispersalcorridors. x xMonitoringtrendsandreviewingpoliciesrelatingtovineyardestablishment.Strivetoavoidestablishingvineyardsinshrub-steppecorehabitatareasorcorridors. x
Consideringestablishmentofadditionalconservationareasatelevationsabovecurrentspeciesrangestoprotectfuturehabitats. xUsinglargeparcelzoningtomaintaincontiguityofnaturalareaswithinFirstNationandtriballands.Outsideoftheselands,workwithprivatelandownersandenvironmentalpolicytomaintaincontiguousswathsofsuitablelandthatwillfacilitatemovement.Considerfullrangeofapproaches,fromlandpurchasesandeasementstostewardshipactivities.
x x x x
Coordinatingwithtransportationagenciestoevaluateappropriatemanagementresponsestopotentialchangesinseasonalroadopeningsandclosingsassnowconditionschangeandhigherelevationhabitatspotentiallybecomemoreaccessibletopeople. x x x xCoordinatingwithtransportationagenciestoensurethatnewroadsdonotnegativelyimpactpriorityareasforhabitatconnectivityunderclimatechange(e.g.,climate-gradientcorridors,orclimate-resilientcorehabitatareasandcorridors). x x x x x x x x xCoordinatingwithtransportationagenciestomitigatebarriereffectsofroadscrossingpriorityareasforhabitatconnectivityunderclimatechange(e.g.,byincorporatingcrossingstructuresintoroaddesign,orretro-fittingroadswithcrossingstructures). x x
TransportationPlanning
Landandwateruseplanningandmanagement
TOPICADDRESSED SPATIALPRIORITY
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Existingcorehabitatareasandcorridors,whichwillbeimportantformaintainingpopulationsundercurrentclimate,andfacilitatingspeciesresponsetofuturechange.Pinch-points,barriersandrestorationopportunities,andareasofhighnetworkcentralityallofferpotentialpriorityareasforimplementation.
x x x x x
Climate-gradientcorridors,whichmayfacilitatespeciesdispersalintocoolerhabitatsasclimatewarms. x x x x x x x x xClimate-resilientcorehabitareasandcorridors(i.e.,thosethatareprojectedtoremainclimaticallysuitable). x x x x x x x x xRiparianareas,whichcurrentlyactasspeciesmovementcorridors,andalsospanclimaticgradients,facilitatingdispersalintocoolerhabitats. x x x x
Cold-waterrefuges–areaswithinstreamsthathavepersistentlylowertemperaturesthanotherstreamareas xPondsthataredeep,freeofpredatoryfish,andlocatedincoolerand/orwettermicro-climates. x xHighways,especiallythosethatrunalonglow-elevationvalleys(e.g.,Highway97and3A)andthosethatcrosstheCascadeRange(e.g.,Highway3andInterstate90),whichmaypresentbarrierstoclimate-drivenrangeshifts. x x x x x xLowelevationvalleys,particularlytheFraserRiverValleyandtheOkanaganValley.ConnectivityFocusAreasofferkeyareasforimplementationintheOkanaganValley. x x x x x x x x x
TOPICADDRESSED ADAPTATIONACTION
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Encouragingtheuseofhighwaysdesigntechniquesthatpreserveconnectivity(e.g.,overpasses,openspanbridges,culverts). x x xEncouragingtheincorporationofwildlife-friendlyfencingintopermittingandplanningprocesses. x x xConsideringimpactsandopportunitiesforhabitatconnectivityduringthereferralsprocess. xEvaluatingopportunitiestoreducegrazingpressureinkeycorridors. xMonitoringcorehabitatsandmovementcorridorsforsuitabilityandbeingpreparedtoaddressand/ormodifythelegalcontextformanagement(e.g.,EndangeredSpeciesAct). x x xConsideringtimingtribal/FirstNationhuntingseasonsaroundkeydispersalperiodsand/orloweringtakelimitstoreducepressureonpopulations. x x
Lawsandregulations
SpatialPrioritiesforImplementation
CaseStudy
CaseStudyIII.PolicyConsiderations
FirstNationsandtribalreferralsresponseprocesses
III.SpatialPrioritiesforImplementation
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 19
TOPICADDRESSED ADAPTATIONACTION
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
Developingtransboundaryhabitatconnectivitymodels. x xGatheringadditionalempiricalinformationonspeciesmovementtovalidateandimprovecorridormodels,andunderstandwhatlandscapefeaturesfacilitateorhindermovement. x x x x x x x
Mappingcurrentpopulationlocations(asopposedtogeneralrangeboundaries). x x xIncorporatingprojectedchangesinhumanlanduseintohabitatconnectivitymodels. xDevelopingfine-scale,transboundarymodelsofriparianlocationandcondition. x x x x xDevelopingtransboundarymodelsofwildfireriskandprobabilityofpestoutbreaks. x x x x x x x x xDevelopingclimaticnichemodels. x x xEvaluatingtheextenttowhichareasprojectedtobecomeclimaticallysuitableforspeciesincludesuitablenon-climaticconditions(e.g.,soils,vegetation,aquatichabitat). x xIdentifyingclimate-resilientcorehabitatareasandcorridors(i.e.,thoselikelytomaintainclimaticsuitability,andexperiencerelativelymodestchangesinrelevantclimaticvariables). x x x x x x x x x xIdentifyingpotentialclimateimpactsonspecificexistingcorehabitatareasandcorridors. x x x x x xIdentifyingcorridorsbetweenlocationswithprojecteddeclinesinclimaticsuitabilityandareaswithprojectedstableorincreasingclimaticsuitability. x x x x x x x
Developingtransboundarymodelsofcold-waterrefugesandprojectedfuturebulltroutdistributions. xDevelopingtransboundaryaquatichabitatconnectivitymodels(includingidentificationofsignificantbarrierstomovement). x
IV.ResearchNeeds CaseStudy
Researchneeds
Washington-British Columbia Transboundary Climate-Connectivity Project 20
AppendixO.Datasetsusedtoidentifypotentialclimateimpactsoneachcasestudyspecies,vegetationsystem,andregion.
Wolverine
Mountain G
oatW
hite-tailed Ptarm
iganW
hitebark Pine
Canada Lynx
Am
erican Marten
Black B
earM
ule Deer
Lewis's W
oodpeckerTiger S
alamander
Bull Trout
Shrub-S
teppeO
kanagan-Kettle
SpeciesCorridorNetwork x x x x x x xLandscapeIntegrityCorridorNetwork x x x x xClimate-GradientCorridorNetwork x x x x x x x x x x x x xConnectivityFocusAreas x
ClimaticNicheModel x x x x x x x x x xColdWaterClimateShield x
ClimaticNicheVegetationModel x x x x x x xMechanisticVegetationModel x x x x x x x
MountainPineBeetleSurvival x x x x x x x
Spring(April1)Snowpack x x x x x x x x x x xLateSpring(May1)Snowpack xLengthofSnowSeason x x x x x x xPercentageofWinterPrecipitationCapturedinApril1stSnowpack x xNumberofFrostDays x xGrowingSeasonLength xIncreaseinAverageAnnualDaytimeTemperature x xTotalSpringPrecipitation x x x x xTotalSummerPrecipitation x x xAnnualMaximum24-hourPrecipitation xNumberofHeavyPrecipitationDays x xAveragePrecipitationIntensity x xTotalSpringRunoff x x xTotalSummerRunoff x x xEvapotranspiration,July-September x x xEvapotranspiration,March-May x xPotentialEvapotranspiration,July-September xDrySpellDuration x x x x x xWaterDeficit,July-September x x x x x x xSoilMoisture,July-September x x x x x x x x xDayswithHighFireRisk x x x x x x x x x x x xStreamTemperature x
IV.Projectedchangesininsectsurvival
V.Projectedchangesinclimaticvariables
CaseStudy
I.Habitatconnectivitymodels
II.Projectedchangesinspeciesdistributions
III.Projectedchangesinvegetationcommunities
DATASETSUSEDINASSESSMENT