the world trade organization · world trade organization essentially, the wto is a place where...
TRANSCRIPT
The World Trade Organization
The World Trade OrganizationCentre William Rappard
rue de Lausanne 154CH–1211 Geneva 21
Switzerland
website: www.wto.org
The first stepis to talk.
Somewhere to negotiate and apply the results
This is where governments go to try to sort out their trade problems.
WTO: not just for liberalizing trade. Sometimes the rules support trade barriers —e.g. to protect consumers or prevent the spread of disease.
What is the WTO?
Somewhere to talk
WTO: Decision Making
GATT
• From 1948 to 1994, the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT) provided the rules for
much of world trade and presided over periods
that saw some of the highest growth rates in
international commerce. It seemed well-
established, but throughout those 47 years, it was
a provisional agreement and organization.
GATT
• The original intention was to create a third
institution to handle the trade side of international
economic cooperation, joining the two “Bretton
Woods” institutions, the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund. Over 50 countries
participated in negotiations to create an
International Trade Organization (ITO) as a
specialized agency of the United Nations.
The Bretton Woods ConferenceOrganizations Created
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
GATT
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
IRBD
World Bank
International Monetary Fund
IMF
GATT
• Meanwhile, 15 countries had begun talks in
December 1945 to reduce and bind customs
tariffs: This first round of negotiations resulted in a
package of trade rules and 45,000 tariff
concessions affecting $10 billion of trade, about
one fifth of the world’s total.
• The tariff concessions came into effect by 30 June
1948 through a “Protocol of Provisional
Application”. And so the new General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade was born, with 23 founding
members (officially “contracting parties”)
GATT
• The ITO Charter was finally agreed in Havana in
March 1948, but ratification in some national
legislatures proved impossible. The most serious
opposition was in the US Congress.
• So, the GATT became the only multilateral
instrument governing international trade from
1948 until the WTO was established in 1995.
GATT’s roundsYear Place/name Subjects covered Countries
1947 Geneva Tariffs 23
1949 Annecy Tariffs 13
1951 Torquay Tariffs 38
1956 Geneva Tariffs 26
1960-1961 Geneva
Dillon Round
Tariffs 26
1964-1967 Geneva
Kennedy Round
Tariffs and anti-dumping measures 62
1973-1979 Geneva
Tokyo Round
Tariffs, non-tariff measures, “framework”
agreements
102
1986-1994 Geneva
Uruguay Round
Tariffs, non-tariff measures, rules, services,
intellectual property, dispute settlement,
textiles, agriculture, creation of WTO, etc
123
2001-2012
2017
Doha Round
Bali???
Tariffs, non-tariff measures, agriculture, labor
standards, environment, competition,
investment, transparency, patents etc.
159
GATT’s rounds
GATT’s rounds
Non-Discrimination Principle
• Non-discrimination has two elements
• Most-favored nation (MFN) applying to border
measures
Each member must grant treatment to all other members as
favorable as it extend to any individual member country
• National Treatment (NT) applying to behind-the-
border measures
Foreign goods within a country should be treated no less
favorably than domestic good with regard to tax policies and
other regulations
Non-Discrimination Principle
General Prohibition of Quotas
• A second important GATT principle
General prohibition of quotas or quantitative restrictions
on trade
Reflects a longstanding view that price distortions (tariffs) are
preferred to quantity distortions in international markets
Quantitative restrictions were one of the most significant
impediments to trade prior to GATT
Exceptions are allowed
Tariffs: what about today?
• Gatt become WTO in 1995
• the World Trade Organization (WTO) isthe only international organizationdealing with the global rules of tradebetween nations. Its main function isto ensure that trade flows assmoothly, predictably and freely aspossible.
World Trade Organization
Essentially, the WTO is a place wheremember governments go to try tosort out the trade problems theyface with each other. The first stepis to talk.
The WTO was born out of negotiations,and everything the WTO does is theresult of negotiations.
World Trade Organization
The bulk of the WTO’s current workcomes from the 1986–94negotiations called the UruguayRound and earlier negotiationsunder the General Agreement onTariffs and Trade (GATT).
The WTO is currently the host to newnegotiations, under the “DohaDevelopment Agenda” launched in2001.
World Trade Organization
Functions:
• Administering WTO trade agreements
• Forum for trade negotiations
• Handling trade disputes
• Monitoring national trade policies
• Technical assistance and training for developing countries
• Cooperation with other international organizations
Please read
Please read
The 10 benefits of WTO
1. The system helps promote peace
2. Disputes are handled constructively
3. Rules make life easier for all
4. Freer trade cuts the costs of living
5. It provides more choice of products and qualities
6. Trade raises incomes
7. Trade stimulates economic growth
8. The basic principles make life more efficient
9. Governments are shielded from lobbying
10.The system encourages good government
WTO: The result is assurance.
The system’s overriding purpose is to helptrade flow as freely as possible — so longas there are no undesirable side-effects.
That partly means removing obstacles.It also means ensuring that individuals,companies and governments know whatthe trade rules are around the world,and giving them the confidence thatthere will be no sudden changes ofpolicy.
WTO: The result is assurance.
In other words, the rules haveto be “transparent” andpredictable.
Hence the risk of disputesspilling over into political ormilitary conflict is reduced.
WTO = Multilateral Trading System
At the heart of the system — known as themultilateral trading system — are theWTO’s agreements, negotiated andsigned by a large majority of the world’strading nations, and ratified in theirparliaments.
These agreements are the legal ground-rules for international commerce.Essentially, they are contracts,guaranteeing member countriesimportant trade rights.
Principles of the trading system
1) Trade without discrimination
2) Freer trade: gradually, throughnegotiation
3) Predictability: through binding andtransparency
4) Promoting fair competition
5) Encouraging development andeconomic reform
REVIEW OF GATT/WTO PRINCIPLES
Protection only through Tariffs
Reduction and Binding of Tariffs
Most Favored Nation (MFN)
Transparency
REVIEW OF WTO PRINCIPLES
• Trade without discrimination
1. Most-favoured-nation (MFN):
Under the WTO agreements, countries cannot
normally discriminate between their trading partners.
Grant someone a special favour (such as a lower
customs duty rate for one of their products) and you
have to do the same for all other WTO members.
REVIEW OF WTO PRINCIPLES
• Trade without discrimination
2 Treating foreigners and locals equally
Imported and locally-produced goods should be treated
equally — at least after the foreign goods have entered
the market. The same should apply to foreign and
domestic services, and to foreign and local trademarks,
copyrights and patents.
REVIEW OF WTO PRINCIPLES
• Freer trade: gradually, through negotiation
Lowering trade barriers is one of the most obvious
means of encouraging trade. The barriers concerned
include customs duties (or tariffs) and measures such as
import bans or quotas that restrict quantities selectively.
From time to time other issues such as red tape and
exchange rate policies have also been discussed.
REVIEW OF WTO PRINCIPLES
• predictable — foreign companies, investors and
governments should be confident that trade barriers
(including tariffs and non-tariff barriers) should not be
raised arbitrarily; tariff rates and market-opening
commitments are “bound” in the WTO;
• more competitive — discouraging “unfair” practices
such as export subsidies and dumping products at
below cost to gain market share;
REVIEW OF WTO PRINCIPLES
• A WTO member may take a “safeguard” action (i.e.,
restrict imports of a product temporarily) to protect a
specific domestic industry from an increase in imports
of any product which is causing, or which is
threatening to cause, serious injury to the industry.
GATT was good
• In the early years, the GATT trade rounds
concentrated on further reducing tariffs
• Continual reductions in tariffs alone helped spur
very high rates of world trade growth during the
1950s and 1960s — around 8% a year on
average.
World trade growth rates
Uruguay Round
• It took seven and a half years, almost twice the
original schedule. By the end, 123 countries were
taking part. It covered almost all trade, from
toothbrushes to pleasure boats, from banking to
telecommunications, from the genes of wild rice to
AIDS treatments. It was quite simply the largest
trade negotiation ever, and most probably the
largest negotiation of any kind in history.
The 15 original Uruguay Round subjects
• Tariffs
Non-tariff barriers
Natural resource
products
Textiles and clothing
Agriculture
Tropical products
GATT articles
• Tokyo Round codes
Anti-dumping
Subsidies
Intellectual property
Investment measures
Dispute settlement
The GATT system
Services
GATT: Agreement on Agriculture
• Agreement on Agriculture addressed three issues Market access
Replaced quotas with a system of bound tariffs (tariffication) and tariff-reduction commitments
Domestic support Distinction was made between
• “Green box” measures—are exempt from any reduction commitments
• “Amber box” measures—are not exempt
Export subsidies Use was not eliminated but limited to specified situations
• Represented a change in rules with little actual
liberalization
GATT: Agreement on Agriculture
GATT: Agreement on Agriculture
GATT: Agreement on Agriculture
GATT: Agreement on Agriculture
Trade in Services
• General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)—significant outcome of Uruguay Round Represented first time services were brought into a multilateral trade
agreement
Negotiations were difficult due to fact that trade in services is less tangible than trade in goods
• Defined trade in services as occurring in one of four modes Mode 1: Cross-border trade
Mode 2: Movement of consumers
Mode 3: Foreign direct investment or FDI
Mode 4: Movement of natural persons
Trade in Services
• Cross-border trade Mode of supply that does not require physical movement of
producers or consumers For example, Indian firms provide medical transcription services to US
hospitals via satellite technology
• Movement of consumers Consumer travels to the country of producer
For example, tourism services
• Foreign direct investment Services that require a commercial presence by producers in
country of the consumers For example, financial services
• Temporary movement of natural persons Non-commercial presence by producers
For example, consulting, construction, and instructional services
Intellectual Property
• An asset in the form of rights conferred upon a product of invention or creation by a country’s legal system
• Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Most contentious aspect of Marrakesh Agreement
Defined intellectual property as belonging to one of six categories
Copyrights
Trademarks
Geographical indications
Industrial designs
Patents
Layout designs of integrated circuits
Applied the principle of nondiscrimination to intellectual property
TRIPS Agreement
• Sets out obligations for members Copyrights
Members must comply with 1971 Berne Convention on copyrights
Trademarks Goods and services are to be protected for a term of no less than seven
years
Provisions for the registration of trademarks must be made and are renewable indefinitely
Geographical indications Members must provide legal means to prevent false use of geographical
indications
Industrial designs Members must protect “independently created industrial designs that are new
or original”
Patents Exceptions exist and include protection of public order, human, animal, and
plant life
Layout designs of integrated circuits Distribution of protected layout designs is forbidden
TRIPS Agreement
TRIPS Agreement
TRIPS Agreement
• Citizens and firms in developed countries own most of the world’s IP
• Developing countries currently often have less IP protection than developed countries Especially in the case of patents
• Raises cost of many goods and services to developing countries Represents a transfer from developing country consumers to
developed country producers
• Issues have also been raised about the impact of new
pharmaceutical patents on access to medicines
A summary
In a nutshell
The basic structure of the WTO agreements: how the six main areas fit together — the umbrella
WTO Agreement, goods, services, intellectual property, disputes and trade policy reviews.
Umbrella AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING WTO
Goods Services Intellectual property
Basic principles GATT GATS TRIPS
Additional details Other goods
agreements and
annexes
Services annexes
Market access
commitments
Countries’ schedules of
commitments
Countries’ schedules of
commitments(and MFN
exemptions)
Dispute settlement DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
Transparency TRADE POLICY REVIEWS
Agreement only by consensus
Everyone has to be persuadedNo one forced by a majority
Everything else follows from negotiations ...
Somewhere to talk
Foremost: The WTO is a forum for negotiations
Tariffs: more bindings and closer to zero
• The bulkiest results of Uruguay Round are the
22,500 pages listing individual countries’
commitments on specific categories of goods and
services. These include commitments to cut and
“bind” their customs duty rates on imports of
goods. In some cases, tariffs are being cut to
zero. There is also a significant increase in the
number of “bound” tariffs — duty rates that are
committed in the WTO and are difficult to raise.
Tariffs: more bindings and closer to zero
• Developed countries’ tariff cuts were for the most
part phased in over five years from 1 January
1995. The result is a 40% cut in their tariffs on
industrial products, from an average of 6.3% to
3.8%. The value of imported industrial products
that receive duty-free treatment in developed
countries will jump from 20% to 44%.
Tariffs a few years ago …
USA years ago….
WTO: Organization
55
MinisterialConferenceWTO
Organization
General Council
Council for Trade in Goods
Council for TRIPS
Councilfor Trade
in ServicesCommittees
CommitteesCommittees
Working Parties
Working Parties
Working Parties
Dispute Settlement
TradePolicy Review
TNC
WTO: a place whereyou can complain
Main actors in the WTO Dispute Settlement System
Art 2 DSU, The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
Administers the WTO Dispute Settlement System
Establishes panels
Adopts panel and Appellate Body reports
Maintains surveillance of implementation
Non-implementation? Authorizes retaliatory measures
The panel 3 – 5 panelists, ad hoc body
The Appellate Body Standing body of 7 members, 4-year term
WTO and AB Secretariat Assist panels and the AB
Main actors in the WTODispute Settlement System
58
How the Dispute Settlement System works
Panel Report Appellate Body
Establishes No appeal? DSB adopts the report
DSB adopts the reports
The Dispute Settlement Body,All Members
59
• Panel proceedings
• (Appellate Body review)
• Inconsistent measures...
– Withdrawal
– Compensation / Suspension of concessions
...and if no mutually agreed solution reached
Measure
60
Main Stages
Good offices,conciliation and
mediation possible at any
moment
Consultations60 days
Panel review6 – 9 months
AB review 60 – 90 days
Adoption of report by the DSB
Implementation
61
First element: Identify the measure(s) at issue
Definition of a measure
AB: “Any act or omission attributable to a WTOMember can be a measure of that Member for thepurposes of dispute settlement proceedings”
Measures may take the form of...
Laws, regulations, administrative instructions,specific application of laws etc (tariffs, quotas,anti-dumping/CVD measures, safeguards ...)
62
Second element: Identify the claims
Definition of a claim
AB: “A claim that the respondent party has violated, ornullified or impaired the benefits arising from, an identifiedprovision of a particular covered agreement.”
How to identify the claimsAB: “Provide a summary – and it may be a briefone – of the legal basis of the complaint that is‘sufficient to present the problem clearly’.”
63
Panel composition
• No permanent panels / panelists, ad hoc
• Indicative list of panelists
• Secretariat proposes nominations, parties can oppose for compelling reasons
• Well-qualified government and/or non-governmental individuals
• If disagreement: Nomination by DG
(at the request of complainant)
Article 8 of the DSU
As of April 2010:
148 panels composed (88 by the DG)! !
64
Third Parties
• “Substantial interest”
• No DSU deadline
– In practice Members notify their “substantial interest” at the DSB meeting at which the Panel is established
• Limited rights
– Right to receive the first written submissions
– Right to make written submissions to the panel
– Right to be heard by the panel
– Enhanced third-party rights? Granting within the
“sound discretion of the panel”
Article 10 of the DSU
65
Panel proceedings
1. First written submissions of the parties
3. First substantive meeting with the parties and third parties - Third party session
4. Written rebuttals of the parties
5. Second substantive meeting with the parties6. Descriptive part of the report to the parties
7. Parties’ comments on the descriptive part8. Interim review9. Final report issued to parties
10. Final report circulated to all Members
Appendix3 DSU –
Generalworking
procedures
2. [Third party submissions]
66
Panel proceedings
1. First written submissions of the parties
3. First substantive meeting with the parties and third parties - Third party session
4. Written rebuttals of the parties
5. Second substantive meeting with the parties6. Descriptive part of the report to the parties
7. Parties’ comments on the descriptive part8. Interim review9. Final report issued to parties
10. Final report circulated to all Members
Appendix3 DSU –
Generalworking
procedures
2. [Third party submissions]
Trade without discrimination
Most-favoured-nation (MFN):treating other people equally
Under the WTO agreements, countriescannot normally discriminate betweentheir trading partners. Grant someone aspecial favour (such as a lower customsduty rate for one of their products) andyou have to do the same for all other WTOmembers.
WTO claims
The system has bothstrengthens and weaknesses.
WTO’s weaknesses
With respect to its weaknesses, despitethe deadlines, a full dispute settlementprocedure still takes a considerableamount of time, during which thecomplainant suffers continuedeconomic harm
No provisional measures (interim relief)are available to protect the economicand trade interests of the successfulcomplainant during the disputesettlement procedure.
WTO’s weaknesses
Even after prevailing in disputesettlement, a successful complainantwill receive no compensation for theharm suffered during the time givento the respondent to implement theruling. Nor does the “winning party”receive any reimbursement from theother side for its legal expenses.
WTO’s strengthens
If one compares the WTO disputesettlement system with the previousdispute settlement system of GATT1947, the current system has beenfar more effective. Moreover, itsquasi-judicial and quasi-automaticcharacter enables it to handle moredifficult cases.
And if something goes wrong?
If a country has done something wrong, itshould swiftly correct its fault. And if itcontinues to break an agreement, itshould offer compensation or suffer asuitable penalty that has some bite.
The priority is for the losing “defendant” tobring its policy into line with the ruling orrecommendations of the panel report orthe appeals report.
If complying with the recommendationimmediately proves impractical, themember will be given a “reasonable periodof time” to do so.
And if something goes wrong?
If after 20 days, no satisfactorycompensation is agreed, the complainingside may ask the Dispute Settlement Bodyfor permission to impose limited tradesanctions (“suspend concessions orobligations”) against the other side. TheDispute Settlement Body must grant thisauthorization within 30 days of the expiryof the “reasonable period of time” unlessthere is a consensus against the request
And if something goes wrong?
In principle, the sanctions should beimposed in the same sector as thedispute. If this is not practical or if itwould not be effective, the sanctions canbe imposed in a different sector of thesame agreement. In turn, if this is noteffective or practicable and if thecircumstances are serious enough, theaction can be taken under anotheragreement. The objective is to minimizethe chances of actions spilling over intounrelated sectors while at the same timeallowing the actions to be effective.