theology as discipleship by keith l. johnson - excerpt
TRANSCRIPT
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 126
T H E O L O G Y A S
D I S C I P L E S H I P
K E I T H L J O H N S O N
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 226
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 326
T H E O L O G Y A S
D I S C I P L E S H I P
K E I T H L J O H N S O N
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 426
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 104862598309210486241048624 Downers Grove IL 104863010486249830931048625983093-104862598309210486261048630
ivpresscom
emailivpresscom
copy104862610486241048625983093 by Keith L Johnson
All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of
students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United
States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For
information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg
Scripture quotations unless otherwise noted are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible copyright
104862510486339830961048633 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA Used by
permission All rights reservedWhile any stories in this book are true some names and identifying information may have been changed to protect
the privacy of individuals
Cover design Cindy Kiple
Interior design Beth McGill
Images Washing Feet by Laura JamesLaura James Fine Arts laurajamesartcom
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (print)
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309610486241048625983095-1048625 (digital)
Printed in the United States of America
As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protectingthe environment and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Johnson Keith L
Teology as discipleship Keith L Johnson
pages cm
Includes index
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (pbk alk paper)
1048625 Teology Practical 1048626 Christian life I itle
BV983092J1048630983092 104862610486241048625983093
104862610486271048624mdashdc10486261048627104862610486241048625983093104862410486271048627104863310486261048630
P 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093 1048625983092 10486251048627 10486251048626 10486251048625 10486251048624 1048633 983096 983095 1048630 983093 983092 1048627 1048626 1048625
Y 1048627983092 10486271048627 10486271048626 10486271048625 10486271048624 10486261048633 1048626983096 1048626983095 10486261048630 1048626983093 1048626983092 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 526
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Preface 983089983089
983089 Recovering Theology 9830891048631
Concerns with heology 983090983088
What Went Wrong 9830901048628
Rebuilding the Discipline 10486271048627
983090 Being in Christ 10486271048631Reraming Reality 10486271048632
Godrsquos Eternal Plan 10486281048629
heology by Participation 1048629983090
983091 Partnership with Christ 1048630983089
he Pattern o Partnership 1048630983090
Lie with Christ 1048631983088
heology with Christ 10486311048631983092 The Word of God 10486321048629
God and Human Words 10486321048630
God and Written Words 983097983089
Christ and Scripture 9830971048629
est Case Jesus and the Pharisees 9830971048632
Reading with Christ 9830899830881048627
983093 Hearing the Word of God 983089983088983097
Reading in Love 983089983089983089
Hearing with the Church 9830899830891048630
est Case Circumcision 983089983090983090
heology o the Word 9830899830901048632
983094 The Mind of Christ 98308910486271048627
he Pattern o Christrsquos Mind 98308910486271048629
Imitating Christ 9830891048628983090
hinking Ater Christ 9830891048628983097
983095 Theology in Christ 98308910486291048629
Subject Index 98308910486321048632
Scripture Index 9830891048632983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 626
- one -
RECOVERING THEOLOGY
The word theology comes rom the Greek terms logos ofen trans-
lated as ldquoreasonrdquo or ldquowordrdquo and theos which means ldquoGodrdquo We
practice theology whenever we think or speak about God We are doing
theology when we pray worship read Scripture teach others about the
aith and make decisions about how to live in a right relationship to God
In this sense every Christian practices theology every day
o illustrate consider the claim ldquoGod is goodrdquo We can imagine using
this claim in a wide variety o contexts It could be turned into a decla-
ration and applied to God during prayer or worship as a orm o praise
We might run across it while reading Scripture and use it to inorm our
understanding o Godrsquos being and character It could be offered as an
explanation or why God acted in a particular way in the past or it might
be employed as an argument or why we should act in a certain way in
the present Te list o possible uses could go on Every one o these uses
requires that we practice theology Afer all who is this ldquoGodrdquo we are
talking about Te word God does not sit as an empty concept in our
minds It has a meaning that has been acquired over the course o our
lives some o it by way o our personal experience with God and some
through the instruction o others Tis meaning is working in the back-
ground whenever we say the word God Te same thing is happening
with our use o ldquogoodrdquo We use this word all the time such as when we
say ldquoTe weather is goodrdquo or ldquoHe is a good personrdquo Tis everyday usage
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 226
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 326
T H E O L O G Y A S
D I S C I P L E S H I P
K E I T H L J O H N S O N
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 426
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 104862598309210486241048624 Downers Grove IL 104863010486249830931048625983093-104862598309210486261048630
ivpresscom
emailivpresscom
copy104862610486241048625983093 by Keith L Johnson
All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of
students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United
States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For
information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg
Scripture quotations unless otherwise noted are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible copyright
104862510486339830961048633 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA Used by
permission All rights reservedWhile any stories in this book are true some names and identifying information may have been changed to protect
the privacy of individuals
Cover design Cindy Kiple
Interior design Beth McGill
Images Washing Feet by Laura JamesLaura James Fine Arts laurajamesartcom
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (print)
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309610486241048625983095-1048625 (digital)
Printed in the United States of America
As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protectingthe environment and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Johnson Keith L
Teology as discipleship Keith L Johnson
pages cm
Includes index
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (pbk alk paper)
1048625 Teology Practical 1048626 Christian life I itle
BV983092J1048630983092 104862610486241048625983093
104862610486271048624mdashdc10486261048627104862610486241048625983093104862410486271048627104863310486261048630
P 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093 1048625983092 10486251048627 10486251048626 10486251048625 10486251048624 1048633 983096 983095 1048630 983093 983092 1048627 1048626 1048625
Y 1048627983092 10486271048627 10486271048626 10486271048625 10486271048624 10486261048633 1048626983096 1048626983095 10486261048630 1048626983093 1048626983092 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 526
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Preface 983089983089
983089 Recovering Theology 9830891048631
Concerns with heology 983090983088
What Went Wrong 9830901048628
Rebuilding the Discipline 10486271048627
983090 Being in Christ 10486271048631Reraming Reality 10486271048632
Godrsquos Eternal Plan 10486281048629
heology by Participation 1048629983090
983091 Partnership with Christ 1048630983089
he Pattern o Partnership 1048630983090
Lie with Christ 1048631983088
heology with Christ 10486311048631983092 The Word of God 10486321048629
God and Human Words 10486321048630
God and Written Words 983097983089
Christ and Scripture 9830971048629
est Case Jesus and the Pharisees 9830971048632
Reading with Christ 9830899830881048627
983093 Hearing the Word of God 983089983088983097
Reading in Love 983089983089983089
Hearing with the Church 9830899830891048630
est Case Circumcision 983089983090983090
heology o the Word 9830899830901048632
983094 The Mind of Christ 98308910486271048627
he Pattern o Christrsquos Mind 98308910486271048629
Imitating Christ 9830891048628983090
hinking Ater Christ 9830891048628983097
983095 Theology in Christ 98308910486291048629
Subject Index 98308910486321048632
Scripture Index 9830891048632983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 626
- one -
RECOVERING THEOLOGY
The word theology comes rom the Greek terms logos ofen trans-
lated as ldquoreasonrdquo or ldquowordrdquo and theos which means ldquoGodrdquo We
practice theology whenever we think or speak about God We are doing
theology when we pray worship read Scripture teach others about the
aith and make decisions about how to live in a right relationship to God
In this sense every Christian practices theology every day
o illustrate consider the claim ldquoGod is goodrdquo We can imagine using
this claim in a wide variety o contexts It could be turned into a decla-
ration and applied to God during prayer or worship as a orm o praise
We might run across it while reading Scripture and use it to inorm our
understanding o Godrsquos being and character It could be offered as an
explanation or why God acted in a particular way in the past or it might
be employed as an argument or why we should act in a certain way in
the present Te list o possible uses could go on Every one o these uses
requires that we practice theology Afer all who is this ldquoGodrdquo we are
talking about Te word God does not sit as an empty concept in our
minds It has a meaning that has been acquired over the course o our
lives some o it by way o our personal experience with God and some
through the instruction o others Tis meaning is working in the back-
ground whenever we say the word God Te same thing is happening
with our use o ldquogoodrdquo We use this word all the time such as when we
say ldquoTe weather is goodrdquo or ldquoHe is a good personrdquo Tis everyday usage
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 326
T H E O L O G Y A S
D I S C I P L E S H I P
K E I T H L J O H N S O N
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 426
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 104862598309210486241048624 Downers Grove IL 104863010486249830931048625983093-104862598309210486261048630
ivpresscom
emailivpresscom
copy104862610486241048625983093 by Keith L Johnson
All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of
students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United
States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For
information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg
Scripture quotations unless otherwise noted are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible copyright
104862510486339830961048633 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA Used by
permission All rights reservedWhile any stories in this book are true some names and identifying information may have been changed to protect
the privacy of individuals
Cover design Cindy Kiple
Interior design Beth McGill
Images Washing Feet by Laura JamesLaura James Fine Arts laurajamesartcom
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (print)
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309610486241048625983095-1048625 (digital)
Printed in the United States of America
As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protectingthe environment and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Johnson Keith L
Teology as discipleship Keith L Johnson
pages cm
Includes index
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (pbk alk paper)
1048625 Teology Practical 1048626 Christian life I itle
BV983092J1048630983092 104862610486241048625983093
104862610486271048624mdashdc10486261048627104862610486241048625983093104862410486271048627104863310486261048630
P 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093 1048625983092 10486251048627 10486251048626 10486251048625 10486251048624 1048633 983096 983095 1048630 983093 983092 1048627 1048626 1048625
Y 1048627983092 10486271048627 10486271048626 10486271048625 10486271048624 10486261048633 1048626983096 1048626983095 10486261048630 1048626983093 1048626983092 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 526
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Preface 983089983089
983089 Recovering Theology 9830891048631
Concerns with heology 983090983088
What Went Wrong 9830901048628
Rebuilding the Discipline 10486271048627
983090 Being in Christ 10486271048631Reraming Reality 10486271048632
Godrsquos Eternal Plan 10486281048629
heology by Participation 1048629983090
983091 Partnership with Christ 1048630983089
he Pattern o Partnership 1048630983090
Lie with Christ 1048631983088
heology with Christ 10486311048631983092 The Word of God 10486321048629
God and Human Words 10486321048630
God and Written Words 983097983089
Christ and Scripture 9830971048629
est Case Jesus and the Pharisees 9830971048632
Reading with Christ 9830899830881048627
983093 Hearing the Word of God 983089983088983097
Reading in Love 983089983089983089
Hearing with the Church 9830899830891048630
est Case Circumcision 983089983090983090
heology o the Word 9830899830901048632
983094 The Mind of Christ 98308910486271048627
he Pattern o Christrsquos Mind 98308910486271048629
Imitating Christ 9830891048628983090
hinking Ater Christ 9830891048628983097
983095 Theology in Christ 98308910486291048629
Subject Index 98308910486321048632
Scripture Index 9830891048632983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 626
- one -
RECOVERING THEOLOGY
The word theology comes rom the Greek terms logos ofen trans-
lated as ldquoreasonrdquo or ldquowordrdquo and theos which means ldquoGodrdquo We
practice theology whenever we think or speak about God We are doing
theology when we pray worship read Scripture teach others about the
aith and make decisions about how to live in a right relationship to God
In this sense every Christian practices theology every day
o illustrate consider the claim ldquoGod is goodrdquo We can imagine using
this claim in a wide variety o contexts It could be turned into a decla-
ration and applied to God during prayer or worship as a orm o praise
We might run across it while reading Scripture and use it to inorm our
understanding o Godrsquos being and character It could be offered as an
explanation or why God acted in a particular way in the past or it might
be employed as an argument or why we should act in a certain way in
the present Te list o possible uses could go on Every one o these uses
requires that we practice theology Afer all who is this ldquoGodrdquo we are
talking about Te word God does not sit as an empty concept in our
minds It has a meaning that has been acquired over the course o our
lives some o it by way o our personal experience with God and some
through the instruction o others Tis meaning is working in the back-
ground whenever we say the word God Te same thing is happening
with our use o ldquogoodrdquo We use this word all the time such as when we
say ldquoTe weather is goodrdquo or ldquoHe is a good personrdquo Tis everyday usage
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 426
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 104862598309210486241048624 Downers Grove IL 104863010486249830931048625983093-104862598309210486261048630
ivpresscom
emailivpresscom
copy104862610486241048625983093 by Keith L Johnson
All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of
students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United
States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For
information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg
Scripture quotations unless otherwise noted are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible copyright
104862510486339830961048633 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA Used by
permission All rights reservedWhile any stories in this book are true some names and identifying information may have been changed to protect
the privacy of individuals
Cover design Cindy Kiple
Interior design Beth McGill
Images Washing Feet by Laura JamesLaura James Fine Arts laurajamesartcom
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (print)
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309610486241048625983095-1048625 (digital)
Printed in the United States of America
As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protectingthe environment and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Johnson Keith L
Teology as discipleship Keith L Johnson
pages cm
Includes index
ISBN 1048633983095983096-1048624-98309610486271048624983096-98309210486241048627983092-1048626 (pbk alk paper)
1048625 Teology Practical 1048626 Christian life I itle
BV983092J1048630983092 104862610486241048625983093
104862610486271048624mdashdc10486261048627104862610486241048625983093104862410486271048627104863310486261048630
P 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093 1048625983092 10486251048627 10486251048626 10486251048625 10486251048624 1048633 983096 983095 1048630 983093 983092 1048627 1048626 1048625
Y 1048627983092 10486271048627 10486271048626 10486271048625 10486271048624 10486261048633 1048626983096 1048626983095 10486261048630 1048626983093 1048626983092 10486261048627 10486261048626 10486261048625 10486261048624 10486251048633 1048625983096 1048625983095 10486251048630 1048625983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 526
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Preface 983089983089
983089 Recovering Theology 9830891048631
Concerns with heology 983090983088
What Went Wrong 9830901048628
Rebuilding the Discipline 10486271048627
983090 Being in Christ 10486271048631Reraming Reality 10486271048632
Godrsquos Eternal Plan 10486281048629
heology by Participation 1048629983090
983091 Partnership with Christ 1048630983089
he Pattern o Partnership 1048630983090
Lie with Christ 1048631983088
heology with Christ 10486311048631983092 The Word of God 10486321048629
God and Human Words 10486321048630
God and Written Words 983097983089
Christ and Scripture 9830971048629
est Case Jesus and the Pharisees 9830971048632
Reading with Christ 9830899830881048627
983093 Hearing the Word of God 983089983088983097
Reading in Love 983089983089983089
Hearing with the Church 9830899830891048630
est Case Circumcision 983089983090983090
heology o the Word 9830899830901048632
983094 The Mind of Christ 98308910486271048627
he Pattern o Christrsquos Mind 98308910486271048629
Imitating Christ 9830891048628983090
hinking Ater Christ 9830891048628983097
983095 Theology in Christ 98308910486291048629
Subject Index 98308910486321048632
Scripture Index 9830891048632983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 626
- one -
RECOVERING THEOLOGY
The word theology comes rom the Greek terms logos ofen trans-
lated as ldquoreasonrdquo or ldquowordrdquo and theos which means ldquoGodrdquo We
practice theology whenever we think or speak about God We are doing
theology when we pray worship read Scripture teach others about the
aith and make decisions about how to live in a right relationship to God
In this sense every Christian practices theology every day
o illustrate consider the claim ldquoGod is goodrdquo We can imagine using
this claim in a wide variety o contexts It could be turned into a decla-
ration and applied to God during prayer or worship as a orm o praise
We might run across it while reading Scripture and use it to inorm our
understanding o Godrsquos being and character It could be offered as an
explanation or why God acted in a particular way in the past or it might
be employed as an argument or why we should act in a certain way in
the present Te list o possible uses could go on Every one o these uses
requires that we practice theology Afer all who is this ldquoGodrdquo we are
talking about Te word God does not sit as an empty concept in our
minds It has a meaning that has been acquired over the course o our
lives some o it by way o our personal experience with God and some
through the instruction o others Tis meaning is working in the back-
ground whenever we say the word God Te same thing is happening
with our use o ldquogoodrdquo We use this word all the time such as when we
say ldquoTe weather is goodrdquo or ldquoHe is a good personrdquo Tis everyday usage
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 526
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Preface 983089983089
983089 Recovering Theology 9830891048631
Concerns with heology 983090983088
What Went Wrong 9830901048628
Rebuilding the Discipline 10486271048627
983090 Being in Christ 10486271048631Reraming Reality 10486271048632
Godrsquos Eternal Plan 10486281048629
heology by Participation 1048629983090
983091 Partnership with Christ 1048630983089
he Pattern o Partnership 1048630983090
Lie with Christ 1048631983088
heology with Christ 10486311048631983092 The Word of God 10486321048629
God and Human Words 10486321048630
God and Written Words 983097983089
Christ and Scripture 9830971048629
est Case Jesus and the Pharisees 9830971048632
Reading with Christ 9830899830881048627
983093 Hearing the Word of God 983089983088983097
Reading in Love 983089983089983089
Hearing with the Church 9830899830891048630
est Case Circumcision 983089983090983090
heology o the Word 9830899830901048632
983094 The Mind of Christ 98308910486271048627
he Pattern o Christrsquos Mind 98308910486271048629
Imitating Christ 9830891048628983090
hinking Ater Christ 9830891048628983097
983095 Theology in Christ 98308910486291048629
Subject Index 98308910486321048632
Scripture Index 9830891048632983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 626
- one -
RECOVERING THEOLOGY
The word theology comes rom the Greek terms logos ofen trans-
lated as ldquoreasonrdquo or ldquowordrdquo and theos which means ldquoGodrdquo We
practice theology whenever we think or speak about God We are doing
theology when we pray worship read Scripture teach others about the
aith and make decisions about how to live in a right relationship to God
In this sense every Christian practices theology every day
o illustrate consider the claim ldquoGod is goodrdquo We can imagine using
this claim in a wide variety o contexts It could be turned into a decla-
ration and applied to God during prayer or worship as a orm o praise
We might run across it while reading Scripture and use it to inorm our
understanding o Godrsquos being and character It could be offered as an
explanation or why God acted in a particular way in the past or it might
be employed as an argument or why we should act in a certain way in
the present Te list o possible uses could go on Every one o these uses
requires that we practice theology Afer all who is this ldquoGodrdquo we are
talking about Te word God does not sit as an empty concept in our
minds It has a meaning that has been acquired over the course o our
lives some o it by way o our personal experience with God and some
through the instruction o others Tis meaning is working in the back-
ground whenever we say the word God Te same thing is happening
with our use o ldquogoodrdquo We use this word all the time such as when we
say ldquoTe weather is goodrdquo or ldquoHe is a good personrdquo Tis everyday usage
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 626
- one -
RECOVERING THEOLOGY
The word theology comes rom the Greek terms logos ofen trans-
lated as ldquoreasonrdquo or ldquowordrdquo and theos which means ldquoGodrdquo We
practice theology whenever we think or speak about God We are doing
theology when we pray worship read Scripture teach others about the
aith and make decisions about how to live in a right relationship to God
In this sense every Christian practices theology every day
o illustrate consider the claim ldquoGod is goodrdquo We can imagine using
this claim in a wide variety o contexts It could be turned into a decla-
ration and applied to God during prayer or worship as a orm o praise
We might run across it while reading Scripture and use it to inorm our
understanding o Godrsquos being and character It could be offered as an
explanation or why God acted in a particular way in the past or it might
be employed as an argument or why we should act in a certain way in
the present Te list o possible uses could go on Every one o these uses
requires that we practice theology Afer all who is this ldquoGodrdquo we are
talking about Te word God does not sit as an empty concept in our
minds It has a meaning that has been acquired over the course o our
lives some o it by way o our personal experience with God and some
through the instruction o others Tis meaning is working in the back-
ground whenever we say the word God Te same thing is happening
with our use o ldquogoodrdquo We use this word all the time such as when we
say ldquoTe weather is goodrdquo or ldquoHe is a good personrdquo Tis everyday usage
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 726
1048625983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
orms the background o our use o this word to describe God Tis
makes things complicated We might say ldquoGood dogrdquo to our puppy and
then say ldquoGod is goodrdquo a ew minutes later Certainly we do not meanexactly the same thing by the word good in both sentences What is the
difference between our use o the word good when we apply it to God as
opposed to our puppy Te task o answering this questionmdasheven im-
plicitly and instinctivelymdashrequires the practice o theology
Tis illustration shows however that even i a Christian has never
engaged in ormal theological study he or she already operates with a
unctional theology at every moment o his or her lie Our unctionaltheology consists o our deault assumptions about who God is what
God is like and how God relates to us983089 Tese assumptions work in the
background o all our thinking and speaking about God Tey affect
every claim we make about God because we filter every word we apply
to God through them So when we read in the Psalms that ldquoGod is goodrdquo
(Ps 9830959830911048625) our unctional theology determines how we understand the
meaning o the words in this sentence In act we have never read orinterpreted any word o Scripture apart rom this kind o preunder-
standing Such is the case or every other claim we have heard or said
about God Teology has been a part o our lives at every moment
Te problem is that our unctional theology can be wrong God is
good but his goodness is not the same as that o the weather a person
or a puppy Figuring out the nature o the similarities and differences
between Godrsquos goodness and these creaturely examples o goodness can
be difficult In our everyday lie or instance we might think that a good
person would not permit innocent people to suffer i he could prevent it
On this basis we might say that because God is good he also would
never allow the innocent to suffer unjustly Yet this is precisely what God
does he sometimes permits the innocent to suffer as he did in the case
o Jesus Christ and believers in the early church (1048626 Tess 1048625983092-983093) It can be
challenging to figure out why we say ldquoGod is goodrdquo even though he will-
1Te term ldquounctional theologyrdquo comes rom J odd Billings Te Word of God for the People of God
An Entryway into the Teological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 983090983088983089983088) 983089983089-
9830891048631
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 826
Recovering heology 10486251048633
ingly permits suffering while a human who does the same thing nor-
mally would not be considered good Tis challenge is so great in act
that sometimes people draw incorrect conclusions about God based ontheir assumptions about what he must be like ldquoA good God would never
allow the innocent to sufferrdquo Multiply this potential or error by every
single word we use or God and it becomes possible i not likely that we
will apply words to God incorrectly by drawing mistaken conclusions
based on our aulty assumptions o what God must be like As a result
we ofen end up with an incorrect picture o God and say untrue things
about himOur potential or error explains why we need the kind o ormal theo-
logical instruction that makes up the discipline o theology Te disci-
pline o theology is the name or the organized practice o theological
reasoning that directs our thoughts and speech about God so that they
correspond to who God is and what God is like Tis discipline came into
existence in response to the act that our unctional theology does not
always match the reality o God Its goal is to shape our ideas and wordsabout God so that that our unctional theology corresponds to the truth
about his divine being and character As a discipline theology developed
over the centuries as prominent thinkers and leaders in the church re-
sponded to theological problems and questions by offering guidelines or
how to speak and think about God correctly Tese guidelines were
drawn rom the churchrsquos reading o Scripture and took orm in the
churchrsquos creeds which serve as summary statements o right thinking
and speaking about core matters o the Christian aith Te church con-
siders thinking and speech about God to be orthodox when it corre-
sponds to this creedal tradition and heretical when it does not
In the present the discipline o theology takes place as theologians
write books articles and biblical commentaries offering insights about
how to think and speak about God correctly Tey teach others by in-
structing them about errors the church has allen into in the past so that
we do not repeat them in the present Tey also offer practical guidance
or addressing the challenging questions Christians ace today such as
those prompted by the existence o suffering cultural changes brought
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 926
10486261048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
about by new technology and the complicated interaction between ad-
herents o different religions that shapes the modern world
C983151983150983139983141983154983150983155 983159983145983156983144 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161
Given its noble purpose its prominent place in church history and the
real contributions it makes to the churchrsquos contemporary lie one would
think that the discipline o theology has a positive reputation among
Christiansmdashbut it does not Every Christian has a unctional theology
but not every Christian has a positive view o the discipline o theology
In act many smart and aithul Christians cringe when they hear theword theology due to the negative connotations the discipline carries
Some even reject the very idea o theology and insist that they can live
aithully without it simply by trusting God and believing the words o
Scripture Tere are at least three reasons why this negative view o the-
ology has developed over time
First many Christians believe that the ormal study o theology dis-
tracts us rom the most important activities o the Christian lie EveryChristian wants to think and speak about God correctly But does the
ormal and organized study o theology help or hinder us in doing so
Tis is a matter o debate Even though much sincere effort has been put
into the discipline o theology over the centuries many Christians be-
lieve it brings ew benefits and many dangers or the church as a whole
Most o us know people who live aithul lives even though they have
never ormally studied theology and at the same time many o us alsoknow or have heard about people who know a lot o theology but live
hypocritically or without aith Such examples prompt the warnings
many students receive about theology proessors who lead students
astray or students who have lost their aith as a result o advanced theo-
logical study
Behind many o these warnings is the worry that the discipline o
theology unnecessarily complicates the aith by making it more complex
and conusing than it needs to be Paul warned that we should ldquoavoid
stupid controversiesrdquo about doctrinal matters because they are ldquounpro-
itable and worthlessrdquo (it 9830911048633) Instead o spending time and energy de-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1026
Recovering heology 10486261048625
bating complex details shouldnrsquot we ocus on the central and most clearly
understood commandments o the Christian lie such as the task o
loving God and neighbor (Lk 104862510486241048626983095) Afer all i one can live aithullywithout theological studymdashand i such study sometimes leads believers
down the wrong path by unnecessarily complicating the aithmdashthen it
makes sense to invest our time and resources elsewhere Doesnrsquot the
discipline o theology distract us rom the real work o the church such
as praying worshiping sharing the gospel and serving others
Second many Christians believe the study o theology inhibits rather
than helps our discipleship to Jesus One way it does so is by under-mining our confidence in the content o the Christian aith Because the
process o engaging new material inevitably challenges long-held as-
sumptions exposes aulty patterns o thinking and prompts new and
difficult questions beginning students o theology ofen find themselves
intellectually shaken by their study Even though their new theological
insights may help students begin to think and speak about God better
than they could beore the process also ofen leaves them eeling ig-norant ldquoHow could I have been a Christian my whole lie and not have
known any o this beorerdquo Instead o becoming stronger in the aith and
better equipped to work and serve within the church the new theologian
ofen is embarrassed by all that he or she does not know and paralyzed
by the prospect o looking oolish when he or she speaks Teology in
this case operates more like law than grace and the theologian retreats
rom doing anything at all lest his or her ignorance be displayed or all
to see Te result as Helmut Tielicke puts it is that a ldquolively young
Christian is horribly squeezed to death in the ormal armor o abstract
ideasrdquo983090 Teological study that should be reeing and enriching instead
becomes restrictive and debilitating
Te mirror image o this problem is that theological study sometimes
leaves people overconfident in their abilities At some point nearly
everyone has been in a Bible study or church meeting with someone who
not only thinks he or she has all the right answers but who also seems
2Helmut Tielicke A Little Exercise for Young Teologians (Grand Rapids Eerdmans 10486259830979830941048626) 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1126
10486261048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
intent on showing that everyone elsersquos answers are wrong Paul warns
about these tendencies when he says that ldquoknowledge puffs uprdquo (1048625 Cor
9830961048625) Some people he tells imothy have ldquoa morbid craving or contro- versy and or disputes about wordsrdquo which causes ldquoenvy dissension
slander base suspicions and wranglingrdquo within the church (1048625 im 983094983092-983093)
Tey seem to enjoy arguing with their ellow Christians about doctrinal
matters because doing so gives them a sense o purpose and identity
Tis identity ofen involves a sense o entitlement and elitism as i their
learning places them above the unenlightened masses who make up the
large part o the church Worse still theologians sometimes use theirskills to manipulate the content o the aith so that it conorms to their
own ideas and goals Paul talks about this tendency when he said that
some peoplersquos ldquoitching earsrdquo lead them ldquoto accumulate or themselves
teachers to suit their own desiresrdquo Teir theological learning leaves them
worse off than beore because it enables them to ldquoturn away rom lis-
tening to the truth and wander away to mythsrdquo they have devised or
themselves (1048626 im 983092983091-983092)Tird many people think the ormal study o theology produces un-
necessary divisions in the church Even though reading the texts o the
great theologians can bring great benefits it also can produce a sense o
disillusionment Many o the theologians widely considered to be
among the best thinkers in church history starkly disagree with one
another about core matters o doctrine Not all o them can be right and
in act many o them think the others are gravely wrong Ofen these
great theologians have entire schools o thought centered around their
views which stand in opposition to other schools o thought based on
the work o other theologians Te existence o these divergent schools
o thought puts us in a situation where the label ldquoChristianrdquo is not
enough We also have to figure out which kind o Christian we aremdash
whether it is Tomist Lutheran Calvinist Arminian or so on While
such labels can help us recognize important differences between various
approaches to theology they also can divide Christians rom one an-
other and hurt the churchrsquos witness
Paul makes this point when he criticizes the Corinthians or engaging
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1226
Recovering heology 1048626983091
in ldquojealousy and quarrelingrdquo between those who held to the teachings o
Apollos and those who identified with Paul himsel Instead o starting
with their immature ldquohuman inclinationsrdquo Paul says the Corinthiansshould view all their various teachers as ldquoGodrsquos servants working to-
getherrdquo or a ldquocommon purposerdquo (1048625 Cor 9830911048626-1048633) Paulrsquos point is clear our
theological distinctions are not irrelevant but even so they must be rela-
tivized by our common bond in Christ and commitment to the churchrsquos
mission Any theological distinction that unnecessarily causes us to lose
sight o this unity and purpose undermines the integrity o the church
and the gospel it proclaims Te problem as many Christians point outis that Paulrsquos instructions have rarely been ollowed by the churchrsquos theo-
logians In act more ofen than not theological debates proceed just like
contemporary political debates with each side deending its views at all
costs while assuming that their opponents are not only wrong but also
morally and intellectual deficient in some way Tis leads to a type o
theological partisanship where adherents o a certain view repeat their
party line without charitably considering other arguments or striving orreconciliation with their opponents In this case the goal o theological
study becomes less about knowing God or enriching the church than
about building up onersquos side and bringing down onersquos enemies
Such activities prompt some Christians to conclude that the study o
theology while noble in and o itsel almost inevitably become a means
by which the theologian serves his or her own interests James makes this
point when he says that conflicts and disputes ofen stem rom our desire
o things we want but do not have (Jas 9830921048625-1048626) Just like the disciples argued
among themselves about ldquowhich one o them was the greatestrdquo (Lk 1048633983092983094)
Christians ofen seek a position o authority over their ellow Christians
Teology ofen is employed as a tool to achieve this goal I a theologian
can prove that his or her opponents are wrong about important matters
o doctrine then he or she can justiy having a position o influence and
power over them Paul encountered this problem when he was chal-
lenged by teachers in Philippi who worked against him out o ldquoenvy and
rivalryrdquo in line with their own ldquoselfish ambitionrdquo (Phil 10486251048625983093-1048625983095) Ten as
today such an approach hurts the church because as James notes ldquowhere
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1326
1048626983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
there is envy and selfish ambition there will also be disorder and
wickedness o every kindrdquo (Jas 9830911048625983094)
Tese are the sorts o consequences that prompt aithul Christians tohave a negative view o theology I theological learning can and ofen
does produce unnecessary and sinul divisions in the churchmdashand i
these divisions are ofen about the desire o some to gain positions o
power and influence over others or their own benefitmdashthen does the
discipline o theology truly benefit the church
W983144983137983156 W983141983150983156 W983154983151983150983143983103One explanation or why and how the ormal practice o theology
became suspect in the eyes o many Christians involves the shifing
occupations o theologians983091 For much o Christian history theology
was practiced almost exclusively rom within the church Most early
theologians or example were bishops and priests responsible or
leading the church in its worship teaching and ministry Teir ormal
theological study ofen stemmed rom their desire to help their con-gregants avoid errors understand Scripture and grow in their de-
votion to God Even when they argued against other theologians they
did so not or themselves but or the sake o the churchrsquos members For
example the theological orations o Gregory Nazianzus against the
Eunomian heresy were delivered as sermons to help his congregation
ldquoavoid being swept wayrdquo by this alse teaching983092 Likewise Cyril o Al-
exandria composed public letters to Nestorius not only to challengeNestoriusrsquos questionable claims about Jesus but also to inorm other
church leaders about his errors so they could instruct their congrega-
tions about Christological matters983093 In these sorts o ways the bishops
and priests used the discipline o theology to urther their pastoral
1048627For this insight see Jaroslav Pelikan Te Christian radition A History of the Development of
Doctrine 983089 Te Emergence of the Catholic radition (983089983088983088ndash983094983088983088) (Chicago University of Chicago
Press 10486259830979830951048629) 10486294Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486279830881048625 from On God and Christ Te Five Teological Orations and wo
Letters to Cledonius trans Fredrick Williams and Lionel Wickham (Crestwood NY St Vladi-
mirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048626) 98309710486275See John McGuckin Saint Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy (Crestwood NY
St Vladimirrsquos Seminary Press 10486269830889830881048628)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1426
Recovering heology 1048626983093
aims and to promote the doctrinal integrity o the church as a whole
Te same could be said o the theologians who lived and worked rom
within the monasteries Although they were never totally separated romthe lie and work o the institutional church the distinct rhythms o the
monastic lie ofen led these monks to bring their theological insights
together with spiritual practices related to purification o the mind and
body Teir isolation also gave them the time to think careully about
difficult theological topics such as Godrsquos triune being or the nature o
Godrsquos relationship to created lie Tis work supplemented the theology
o the bishops and priests in important ways Augustinersquos conversionstands as a case in point Even though he greatly admired his bishop
Ambrose Augustine recalls that Ambrose did not know about Augus-
tinersquos ldquospiritual turmoilrdquo because he was too busy meeting the needs o
his congregation ldquoTe crowds o people who came to him on business
impeded merdquo he recalls ldquoallowing me little opportunity either to talk or
to listen to himrdquo1048630 A turning point came when Augustine read Te Life of
Antony a book describing the amous monkrsquos spiritual lie and practicesAntonyrsquos example challenged Augustinersquos view o the world and prompted
a line o thinking that eventually led to his conversion1048631 Tis influence
lingered even afer Augustine became a bishop as the monastic style o
theology and the example o monks like Antony continued to shape his
writings and ministry
A common actor uniting the work o the bishops priests and monks
was their assumption that theological study should be integrally related
to a lie o discipleship Persons who wanted to study theology needed to
ldquopuriy themselvesrdquo in the pattern o Christ (1048625 Jn 983091983091) Tis meant that
ormal theological study was not something that just anyone could do
For instance Gregory Nazianzus argues that theology should be pursued
only by ldquothose who have been tested and have ound a sound ooting in
study and more importantly have undergone or at the very least are
6Augustine Te Confessions 98309410486271048627 trans Maria Boulding OSB (Hyde Park NY New City Press
1048625983097983097983095) 9830979830977Augustine Te Confessions 98309610486251048629 9830961048626983097 (trans Boulding) 10486251048629983095 1048625983094983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1526
1048626983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
undergoing purification o body and soulrdquo1048632 I the mind and body are
integrally related to one another then the theological ormation o the
mind must go hand in hand with acts o bodily obedience in the patterno Christ ldquoDo we commend hospitalityrdquo Gregory asks ldquoDo we admire
brotherly love wiely affection virginity eeding the poor singing
psalms night-long vigils penitence Do we mortiy the body with
asting Do we through prayer take up our abode with God Do we
establish our mastery over our passions mindul o the nobility o our
second birthrdquo Gregory insists that the answer to all these questions must
be yes because such actions work to ldquosmooth the theologian in us likea statue into beautyrdquo1048633 Teological learning is pursued rightly when it
occurs within the context o a lie o discipleship because the practices
o discipleship enable and enrich our pursuit o theological knowledge
Tis presupposed connection between theology and discipleship
slowly began to change during the medieval period when the discipline
o theology became part o the curriculum o the university Teologians
began to pursue their work primarily rom the role o proessor and thisshif carried several benefits Te university provided theologians a space
akin to the monastery reeing them rom administrative burdens and
giving them the chance to study and write or extended periods At the
same time theologians were able to remain more connected to the insti-
tutional church than the monks had been because they could participate
in local church services and live in direct contact with the churchrsquos
members and leaders Teir teaching duties also put them into conver-
sation with a wide variety o people rom across the culture including
scholars rom other academic disciplines Now more than ever theolo-
gians had the opportunity to learn rom external sources and incorporate
new ways o thinking into their doctrinal work Teologians became
portals through which the church received an influx o resh ideas and
insights that enriched its internal thinking and practice Tis presented
theologians with exciting opportunities From their vantage point in the
university theologians could draw connections between the churchrsquos
8Gregory Nazianzus Oration 10486269830951048627 from On God and Christ 10486269830959Gregory Nazianzus Oration 1048626983095983095 from On God and Christ 1048627983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1626
Recovering heology 1048626983095
theology the practical lives o everyday believers and the questions
central to the culture at large Tese new connections became the starting
point rom which they were able to make innovative and lasting contri-butions to the church to help it pursue its mission in the world
Tis ideal was challenged however as the universities changed rom
their medieval to their modern orm Tese shifs stemmed rom changes
in the way the universities determined what counted as true academic
learning As Nicholas Wolterstorff explains a universityrsquos standard o
scholarship teaching and learning tends to be drawn rom disciplines
that are considered ldquoparadigmaticrdquo within the wider culture9830891048624 Inmedieval universities this position had been held by theology which had
been regarded as the most noble discipline and the one by which the
others were measured983089983089 By the time o the Enlightenment however the
natural and social sciences began to replace theology in this central role
Tese disciplines brought with them a slate o new assumptions about
the nature o God and his relationship with creation For example many
scientists at the time were influenced by Deism which meant they be-lieved that God had created the world and then lef it to operate ac-
cording to its own natural laws On this basis they assumed that the
content o Godrsquos wisdom is embedded in and can be known rom the
structure o the universe itsel Tey also held that because humans have
rational minds that reflect Godrsquos own image every human must be natu-
rally capable o discovering the truth about God simply by acquiring an
understanding o the natural order o the universe and then conorming
his or her thinking to it983089983090
Tese new assumptions changed what counted as proper learning
10Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoTe ravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo in Te Future of Te-
ology Essays in Honor of Juumlrgen Moltmann ed Miroslav Volf Carmen Kreig and Tomas Kucharz
(Grand Rapids Eerdmans 1048625983097983097983094) 1048627983097 Also see John Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo in Confess-
ing God Essays in Christian Dogmatics II (London amp Clark 10486269830889830881048629) 10486251048627-1048625983095 My analysis of
theologyrsquos place in the modern university is indebted to the arguments presented in these two
essays11See for example the remarks of Tomas Aquinas in Summa Teologica I q 1048625 a 1048629 All quotations
from the Summa Teologica in this volume are drawn from Basic Writings of Saint Tomas Aqui-
nas ed Anton C Pegis 1048626 vols (New York Random House 104862598309710486281048629)12On this point see Charles aylor Sources of the Self Te Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge
MA Harvard University Press 1048625983097983096983097) 10486269830951048625-9830951048628
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1726
1048626983096 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
within the university No longer did scholars assume that they must turn
to Scripture or the church to know the truth about God instead they
needed to turn to the order o nature and then observe its processes ra-tionally and objectively983089983091 Tey argued that we see things rationally and
objectively when we are ree o biases that distort our ability to sort
through the evidence we encounter A discipline is truly ldquoscientificrdquo when
it can account or the way it filters out any biases present within it so that
the scholar can observe and assess her subject matter in an objective way
Biases enter into our thinking in two key ways First we become biased
when we assume that our approach is the only way something can bedone rather than merely one approach that reflects our own particular
time place or culture For example even though we may have strong
convictions about certain ethical or moral matters these sorts o convic-
tions differ widely between cultures and periods o history I we are to
approach ethical issues scientifically we must set aside our personal
commitments and proceed according to universal maxims applicable to
every person in all times and places While we are ree to maintain ourpersonal views in our private lie only those commitments that are uni-
versally applicable should shape our academic research and its conclu-
sions Second biases also tend to come rom a misplaced reliance on
sources o authority o proceed scientifically we cannot assume that any
particular source inherently carries authority such that it can be trusted
without question Rather we must evaluate every so-called authoritative
source in order to determine what i anything within this source cor-
responds to the objective standard o critical reason Only claims that
correspond to this standard can be used as the basis or knowledge983089983092
As theologians aced these new criteria or their academic work within
the university they ound themselves pulled in two different directions
On the one hand they still had the task o contributing to the doctrinal
and spiritual lie o the church Because the church operated rom the
13See Michael Allen Gillespie Te Teological Origins of Modernity (Chicago University of Chi-
cago Press 1048626983088983088983096) 1048625983094-104862598309514For an exploration of this point see Jeffrey Stout Te Flight from Authority Religion Morality
and the Quest for Autonomy (Notre Dame IN University of Notre Dame Press 10486259830979830961048625) 10486251048628983097-1048629983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1826
Recovering heology 10486261048633
starting point o aith assumed the accuracy o authoritative sources like
the Bible and believed that right thinking must go together with par-
ticular moral actions many theologians within the university still soughtto explain the contribution o theology in these terms On the other hand
theologians elt pressure to justiy their conclusions according to the
academic criteria that governed the university Tis meant that rather
than starting with aithmdashwhich might distort their ability to assess evi-
dence rationallymdashthey had to begin with universally accepted premises
and employ the methods o critical reason No longer could they appeal
to the authority o the Bible or the churchrsquos tradition to deend theirclaims Instead they had to determine which claims rom these sources
could be objectively verified as a reliable guide to rational thinking or
every human being
o deal with this tension many theologians tried to mediate between
the church and the university by perorming theological work that both
contributed to the church and met the standards o the academy One o
the most impressive attempts o this sort was put orth by FriedrichSchleiermacher a pastor and theologian in Berlin at the beginning o the
nineteenth century He begins with the premise that the discipline o
theology must include both ldquoscientific inormation and practical in-
structionrdquo and that each element must be maintained in its ull integrity983089983093
He insists that any academic study o theology that has no relation to the
churchrsquos practical lie ldquoceases to be theologicalrdquo At the same time he
argues that a church that ails to explain its belies and practices ac-
cording to the standards o critical reason undermines its own ldquohistorical
importancerdquo by exercising ldquoa mere muddle o attempted influencerdquo in
society9830891048630 Te way orward is or church leaders to become academics
who help the church adhere to the standards o critical reason while also
showing those outside the church that anyone thinking rationally should
turn to the church to find reason in its highest orm
o this end Schleiermacher argues that academic theologians should
15Friedrich Schleiermacher Brief Outline of Teology as a Field of Study 1048627rd ed ed and trans
errence N ice (Louisville KY Westminster John Knox 104862698308810486251048625) 1048627 (paragraph 1048629)16Ibid 983094 1048626 983095 (paragraphs 983094 1048626 and 10486251048626)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 1926
9830911048624 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
engage in two central tasks First they should demonstrate that the
churchrsquos practices are ldquoa necessary element or the development o the
human spiritrdquo rather than the product o their own specific commit-ments9830891048631 o do this theologians have to assess the churchrsquos practices with
ldquocomplete impartialityrdquo according to the standards o critical reason and
then show how these practices relate to every person no matter his or her
specific cultural or religious background9830891048632 Second they should employ
a ldquogenuinely deliberative characterrdquo as they direct the churchrsquos thought
worship and ministry9830891048633 Teir goal will be to refine the churchrsquos belies
and practices by exposing its untested presuppositions critically as-sessing authoritative sources like the Bible and aligning its doctrine and
activities with the universal standards o critical reason Although this
process o refinement may be difficult and painul it ultimately will
strengthen the church by transposing its traditional ormulations into
terms that can be accepted and understood by any rational person Tis
will enable the church to ulfill its mission more successully because
now the church will be able to explain and deend its aith by the stan-dards o rationality that govern society as a whole
Tis twoold vision or relationship between theology and the church
shaped the way Schleiermacher approached theological education In his
view the primary goal o theological learning is to transorm a student
rom a ldquomere carrier o traditionrdquo into a thinker who is capable o en-
gaging the best insights o the age rom across every discipline9830901048624 Every
theologian not only must be a saint thereore but a scholar as well Tis
means that theological training should occur primarily within the uni-
versity and proceed in line with the standards o critical scholarship
Academic training would not lead theologians away rom but into the
church because the university should have a vested interest in the church
as the place where the highest ideals o human reason are ulfilled
Tis vision or theological education was deeply influential and
17Ibid 1048625983088-10486251048625 (paragraphs 10486261048625-10486261048626)18Ibid 9830951048625 (paragraph 10486259830971048627)19Ibid 983097983095 (paragraph 10486261048629983097)20Ibid 983097 (paragraphs 1048625983096-1048625983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2026
Recovering heology 9830911048625
widely adopted even among those who disagreed with the content o
Schleiermacherrsquos theology Te result was a broad shif in the way Chris-
tians practiced the discipline Whereas theologians once had been ac-countable strictly to the standards o the church and its mission now
they were accountable to the standards o both the church and the uni-
versity Tis dual accountability changed the way they interacted with
non-theological disciplines Te best theologians had always engaged
the insights o other disciplines including the sciences Tey always had
done so however with the goal o drawing these disciplines into theol-
ogyrsquos intellectual rameworkmdasha ramework built on the presuppositionsthat ollow rom the conession o aith in Jesus Christ Now the di-
rection o movement reversed Teologians interacted with these same
disciplines not in order to rerame them in light o their aith but to
secure theologyrsquos place in the academy alongside every other discipline
Te result was that along with the need to establish their claims ac-
cording to Scripture and the churchrsquos tradition theologians now also elt
pressure to justiy their claims according to the academic criteria gov-erning the university
Tis pressure created several problems Te most critical problem was
that the standards governing the university had been derived rom dis-
ciplines which proceeded on the basis o presuppositions about the
nature o reality and history that were markedly different rom those that
traditionally governed the practice o theology As a result as John
Webster notes theology now had to be practiced in ldquoalienation rom its
own subject matter and proceduresrdquo i it was to remain legitimately aca-
demic983090983089 Formerly theologians had pursued theological training in order
to acquire knowledge habits and skills that would shape them into the
pattern o Jesus Christ or the sake o their service to the church Spiritual
ormation and active participation in the lie and ministry o the church
were a central part o theological training because these activities were
thought to be intrinsic to the pursuit o the knowledge o God Now with
the discipline o theology housed primarily in the university the primary
21Webster ldquoTeological Teologyrdquo 1048625983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2126
9830911048626 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
goal o theological education was to provide students with the technical
skills they needed to perorm responsible critical enquiry so that the
churchrsquos aith and practice could be brought in line with the standards ocritical reason983090983090 Te difference between the two approaches changed the
way theologians operated Rather than beginning rom the presuppo-
sition that theology and discipleship are intrinsically related to one an-
other theologians proceeded as i the practices o the aithmdashsuch as
worship prayer and discipleship to Christmdashexisted in a realm distinct
rom the practice o theology A lie o discipleship and the assumptions
patterns o thinking and practices associated with it became just oneoptional way a theologian might apply his or her theological training
But by no means was it assumed that the theologian needed to make this
kind o application in order to practice the discipline rightly
Tis historical shif and the methodological changes it produced help
explain the tensions that exist between the discipline o theology and
many Christians Despite their great learning theologians have some-
times struggled to apply their insights to the lie o the church or evento their own spiritual lives because they have not been trained or re-
quired to do so An academic theologian can practice the discipline
within the university and never need to connect his or her theology to
the everyday practices o the church Some theologians even hold them-
selves at armrsquos length rom the church by adopting an attitude o de-
tachment toward it as they go about their work Sometimes this stems
rom the worry that applying onersquos work to the church makes it less than
truly academic other times it is the result o animosity toward the unc-
tional theology and practices o the church At the same time many
people in the church adopt a similar attitude o detachment toward the
work o theologians much o which seems irrelevant or hostile to the
churchrsquos daily lie and mission
Tis posture along with tensions it produces leaves each side rus-
trated with the other Many Christians in the church worry that the
discipline o theology is more beholden to the academy than to Christ
22Ibid 10486251048629
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2226
Recovering heology 983091983091
and so they are suspicious about the content produced by academic
theologians Tis ofen leads them either to ignore academic theology
or reject it Academic theologians in turn ofen are exasperated withwhat they perceive as the simplistic aith o church members who hold
views they consider to be unreflective and untenable Tis drives theo-
logians even deeper into the academy with some o them seeing them-
selves as ldquonothing short o heroic in reusing to give the church what it
wantsrdquo983090983091 Teology becomes more and more irrelevant to the lie o the
church and the members o the church go about their business as i they
do not need theology
R983141983138983157983145983148983140983145983150983143 983156983144983141 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983145983150983141
Te reality o the matter is that the church needs theology and theolo-
gians need the church o untether the church rom ormal theological
instruction is to give our unctional theology ree rein over our thinking
and practice Tis is a problem and it remains so even i we try our best
to adhere strictly to the teachings o Scripture Because we inevitablyinterpret every word o Scripture in light o our presuppositions about
the nature o God and reality these presuppositions will determine what
we think Scripture says and means I we leave these presuppositions
untested and unexamined they are likely to be shaped not only by
Scripture but also by our own ideals and the predominant currents o our
age I the church is going to think and speak rightly about Godmdashand i
it is not going to repeat the same theological errors generation afer gen-erationmdashthen it needs the guidance provided by ormal doctrinal in-
struction grounded in the history o the theological tradition
Likewise i we attempt to practice the discipline o theology in dis-
tinction rom the lie and work o the church then the presuppositions
governing the modern university likely will govern our theological
method Because the university assumes a ramework o meaning and a
criterion o rationality distinct rom those presupposed within the
Christian aith the content o our theology is likely to become increas-
23Wolterstorff ldquoravail of Teology in the Modern Academyrdquo 1048627983095
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2326
983091983092 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
ingly divorced rom this aith Not only will this make our work less
relevant to the church but also it will undermine the purpose o the
discipline Te traditional goal o Christian theology is to develop abetter understanding o God so that we can think and speak rightly
about God within the context o a lie governed by our aith in Christ
and our discipleship to him in community with other Christians Te-
ology that proceeds rom other grounds stands in tension with this goal
I our claims are offered not with the end o knowing God or enabling
obedience to Christ but with the end o showing rational coherence then
the most important thing becomes our ability to establish our right tomake these claims and to show that they stand together coherently Tis
leaves theologians operating as i their primary goal is to deend the in-
tegrity o their own views Practices like appealing to mystery or being
willing to retract onersquos viewsmdashboth central to the traditional practice o
theologymdashbecome a sign o incompetence or weakness At the same
time spiritual practices such as prayer worship and moral ormation are
relegated to the realm o application as i they have nothing to do withour ability to think and speak about God rightly
In this sense Schleiermacher was right the aith and practice o the
church cannot be separated rom the academic study o theology Our
challenge is to figure out what it looks like to bring them together so that
we can practice theology both aithully and with intellectual integrity
Te latter emphasis means that we cannot turn back the clock and
practice theology as it was done in the past beore the pursuit o the-
ology was linked to the practices o the university And in act the dis-
cipline o theology has benefitted greatly rom the university and con-
tinues to do so Teologians are better off when they have been trained
according to the highest standards o critical scholarship because this
training enables them to evaluate presuppositions engage opposing ar-
guments examine the coherence and implications o their claims and
draw on the insights rom other sources o pull the discipline o the-
ology out o the academy by making it solely an internal church enter-
prise would be unnecessary and unwise We would be turning rom the
multitude o gifs and opportunities God has given his church through
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2426
Recovering heology 983091983093
the university and undermining our ability to do our best theological
work Tere is no reason to assume that the practice o theology cannot
be brought together with the highest standards o academic scholarshipTe question is not whether theology also should be academic in char-
acter but how it should be
Te problem with Schleiermacherrsquos approach is not that he brought
the discipline o theology together with the standards o the university
but that he worked in the wrong direction as he did so He and other
theologians across the entire theological spectrum allowed the assump-
tions o the modern university to set the parameters into which the dis-cipline o theology must fit Teologians had to begin their work by as-
suming the view o reality and history that governed the scientific
disciplines that shaped the academic discourse within the university
Tis meant that theologians had to operate on the basis o a specific set
o presuppositions about what counts as reasonable what kind o claims
can be justified and how arguments can be rightly made and deended
As a result theologians had to practice their discipline rom a distinctlynon-theological starting point
What i we worked in the other direction What i we practiced the-
ology in a way that corresponded to the highest academic qualities but
according to the presuppositions o the Christian aith o practice the-
ology in this way we would have to rebuild our conception o the dis-
cipline rom the ground up We would begin with the presupposition
that the discipline o theology operates rightly when it proceeds on the
basis o our aith in Jesus Christ Our task would be to determine what
counts as rational by starting with Godrsquos wisdom as it has been revealed
in the saving work o Christ and the Holy Spirit Ten not only would
we be able to connect the practice o theology to our lie o discipleship
but we also could consider it to be a orm o discipleship Even the most
academic o theologians could seek to embody the qualities and char-
acteristics that go along with obedience to Christ and they would seek
to utilize their theological work to serve the lie and mission o the
church At the same time they would converse with the best insights o
other disciplines in the university both in order to learn rom them and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2526
983091983094 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 983137983155 D983145983155983139983145983152983148983141983155983144983145983152
to contribute to them Tis interdisciplinary conversation would not be
in addition to the theologianrsquos lie o aith and service to the church but
an integral part o it By describing the discipline o theology in this waywe can offer an account o the practice o theology that overcomes many
o the worries Christians have about it Specifically we can establish a
ramework rom which we can practice theology in a way that is both
academic and aithul by showing that our commitment to academic
integrity and our aith in Jesus Christ do not exist in tension with one
another
Te chapters that ollow describe what it looks like to practice thediscipline o theology in this way Our starting point will be our con-
ession that Jesus Christ is Lord and our belie that God raised him rom
the dead (Rom 104862510486241048633) We will work out the implications o this conession
or our understanding o the nature o God the content o Godrsquos wisdom
and the order o created reality and history On this basis we will figure
out what it looks like to live in relationship with God in light o the act
that Jesus Christ lives as the risen Lord We then will seek to understandhow God acts to shape our ideas and language so that we can think and
speak about him rightly Finally we will describe key characteristics that
distinguish theologians who practice theology within the context o a lie
o discipleship to Jesus Te goal o this rebuilding effort will be to show
how a aithul theologian can be academically excellent and an academic
theologian can be aithul
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8202019 Theology As Discipleship By Keith L Johnson - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulltheology-as-discipleship-by-keith-l-johnson-excerpt 2626