thermalization of the quark-gluon plasma and dynamical formation of bose condensate nn2012 @ san...
TRANSCRIPT
Thermalization of the Quark-Gluon Plasmaand Dynamical Formation of Bose Condensate
NN2012 @ San Antonio MAY.31th, 2012
Jinfeng LiaoIndiana University, Physics Dept. & CEEM
RIKEN BNL Research Center
Outline
• The Pre-Equilibrium Matter in Heavy Ion Collisions
• Important Features: Overpopulation & Uni-Scale
• A Kinetic Approach: Dynamical BEC & Separation of Scales
• Discussions
References:Blaizot, Gelis, JL, McLerran, Venugopalan, Nucl. Phys. A873, 68 (2012);Blaizot, JL, McLerran, to appear; Chiu, Hemmick, Khachatryan, Leonidov, JL, McLerran, arXiv:1202.3679 [nucl-th].
“Little Bang” in the Laboratories
Currently ongoing heavy ion collisions programs: RHIC (BNL), since 2000; LHC (CERN), since 2010.
RHIC Event (from STAR)
LHC Event (from ALICE)
Beautiful “little bang” delivered ! T~10^12 K : The hottest matter today!Furthermore: strongly interacting !
Hot QCD Matter: Nearly Perfect Fluid
Created matter’s explosion appears nearly ideal strongly coupled
Song, Bass, Heinz, Hirano, Shen, 2010
“Coupling-ometer” via transport properties e.g. shear viscosity0
(infinitely viscous)Infinity
(eta/s=1/4pi)(quantum limit?)
Hot QCD Matter: Strong Jet Quenching
Jet-medium interaction is very strong color-opaque matter! (high Pt yield (Raa), di-hadron correlation,…… )
Gyulassy, Wang; ……
Just After the “Little Bang”??? Heavy ion physics modeling (hydro, jet, …) implies a thermalized QGP already around 1 fm/c fast thermalization, or strong re-scattering Strongly interacting matter from the very beginning, but how?
t = 0 t = 1fm/c
The energy/momentum scale, ~1 GeV, is still high here A.F. says the coupling should be small/moderate ?!
However, the (phase-space) density is so high
that it coherently amplifies interaction
More is different ! crucial for early time evolution!
The Pre-Equilibrium Matter
Pre-equilibrium matter(We focus on this!)
Strong constraint from the initial condition:
saturation
Strong constraint from Hydro modeling and empirical data:
fast “thermalization” ~ fm/c(to the extent of justifying hydro as effective description)
Before the collision: saturation
Right after the collision
Strong longitudinal expansion anisotropy;
Instabilities play an important role:
Isotropization of energy-momentum tensor;
rapid growth toward large occupation of soft modes;
on the time scale ~ 1/Qs .
The Pre-Pre-Equilibrium
A High Density Gluon SystemWe consider a high density gluon system, starting at a time
Some idealization concerning real heavy ion collisions: very large transversely; very high energy , i.e. large Qs and small coupling
Energy scale
Our starting point
Far from Equilibrium…
The initial gluon system is far from equilibrium ! (Plotted here: f(p) )
Equilibrium Distribution
(with the same Energy density)
Initial gluon distribution
Saturation Scale Qs ~ 1 GeV or larger, weakly coupled
Thermalization: how the initial distribution evolves toward the equilibrium?
Three Important Features of the Initial System
Very high phase space density f ~ 1/alpha_s
Strong overpopulation
Only one scale that characterizes the distribution
Amplified Scattering
The initial gluon system is highly occupied change the power-counting
e.g. for the collision integral in kinetic evolution
Coherent amplification of scattering Fast thermalization from overpopulation?!
Kinetic Evolution
With 22 gluon scattering & small-angle approximation(Blaizot, JL, McLerran, to appear)
For highly occupied initial condition:coupling constant disappears in the scales!
In contrast, for thermalized BE distribution:
(BE as fixed point)
OVERPOPULATIONWe consider a high density gluon system, starting at a time
Overpopulation parameter:
For our initial gluon system:
In contrast, for equilibrated QGP:
For the given amount of energy, there are initially way too many gluons !
OVERPOPULATION
For the given amount of initial energy, our gluon system has too many gluons
Actually a “cold” dense system of gluons initially
can NOT equilibrate to a BE distribution by default (assuming elastic dominance)
Does building up a chemical potential help? NO!The maximum gluons that can be accommodated by a Bose-Einstein distribution with \mu:
OVERPOPULATION
Overpopulation Bose-Einstein condensation for equilibrium state
All the extra gluons get absorbed into zero momentum mode.
Bose-Einstein Condensation from Overpopulation
Initial overpopulation + Energy & Number conservation BEC !!
Atomic BEC: for given number of atoms, reduce energy (cooling) toward overpopulation
Dynamical formation of BEC at the early stage after heavy ion collisions: born to have too many gluons for the available energy , really fascinating !
(Caveat: assuming elastic process dominance on certain time scale; discuss later…)
Initially Uni-ScaleThere is ONLY ONE SCALE initially, i.e. the Qs
This distribution is highly un-desired thermodynamically, i.e. by examining the entropy:
Thermalization maximization of entropy
More beneficial to distribute the gluons
to wider region in p-space with f ~ 1
Separation of Scales
There is ONLY ONE SCALE initially,
We introduce two scales --- momentum cutoff scale & the saturated scale
Toward thermalization, the two scales must be separated! By how much? Again, for a very weakly coupled equilibrated QGP
Thermalization must be accompanied by specific separation of the two scales:
Recap of the Scenario
A highly overpopulated gluon system evolving toward equilibrium:
High occupancy
coherent amplification of scattering, ~O(1) effect despite coupling
Strong overpopulation dynamical BEC formation
Initial uni-scale separation of the two scales by coupling \alpha_s
NEXT: analytic analysis of scaling solutions ; ultimately nuermically solving the equation
Kinetic Approach & Approximate Scaling Solution
Blaizot, JL, McLerran, to appear.
The “Static Box” ProblemA schematic scaling distribution characterized by the two evolving scales:
Time evolution of the distribution, i.e. of the two scales need two conditions
Essential points here: • Energy is conserved, but not gluon number absorption into condensate • Collision time scale (from transport equation) ~ \tau for scaling solutions
Thermalization in The “Static Box”Two conditions fixing the time evolution:
The scaling solution:
Upon thermalization: separation of scales; entropy production; eliminating over-pop.
Thermalization in The “Static Box”Two conditions fixing the time evolution:
The scaling solution:
Upon thermalization: separation of scales; entropy production; eliminating over-pop.
Condensate in The “Static Box”Condensate dominates the number density:
While gluons dominate the energy density
A robust, though transient ultimately, Bose-Einstein condensate can be dynamically formed and maintained during the thermalization!
Evidence of BEC from Scalar Field Theory Computation
From: Epelbaum & Gelis
Evidence of BEC from Scalar Field Theory Computation
From: Berges & Sexty
Effect of Longitudinal ExpansionAssuming boost-invariance and studying mid-rapidity
Further assuming certain fixed anisotropy
Effect of Longitudinal ExpansionTwo conditions fixing the time evolution:
The scaling solution:
Upon thermalization: separation of scales; entropy production; eliminating over-pop.
Condensate in Expanding CaseNOTE: anisotropic expansion reduces overpopulation
Condensate still can exist and dominate density:
Energy carried by condensate is subleading:
The more isotropic the expansion is, the stronger the condensation will be.
Would be great to test in scalar/gauge field simulations aand kinetic computation.
Summary: a Scenario for the First-Fermi/c after Little Bang
The pre-equilibrium matter starts with
high gluon density and one scale.
Elastic scattering is coherently enhanced despite the
small coupling, therefore leading to strongly interacting
matter even at early time and driving the thermalization.
Strong overpopulation enforces the system toward BEC.
Separation of scales must happen toward thermalization.
Expansion may proceed with asymmetry anisotropic hydro?
Post Summary: EM Production in the Pre-Equilibrium Matter
Chiu, Hemmick, Khachatryan, Leonidov, JL, McLerran, arXiv:1202.3679 [nucl-th].
There should be additional EM emission from the pre-equilibrium stage We derived fitting formula motivated by our thermalization scenario.
PHOTONS DILEPTONS
There are important contributions to EM production from the pre-equilibrium matter !