these slides are part of a navigator presentation and are incomplete without the accompanying oral...
TRANSCRIPT
These slides are part of a Navigator presentation and are incomplete without the accompanying oral commentary.
MRIA PresentationJune 18, 2008
Research in Post Conflict Nations
2
Overview
Introduction
Case studiesWest Bank GazaKosovo
Challengeslessons for home and away
Research & trainingusing projects as a teaching tool
Emerging tools
Questions & answers
3
Navigator
Research.Strategy. Results.
Research-based strategy firm that works with companies, organizations and governments to solve corporate and public affairs challenges.
At Navigator, we believe research is fundamental to a winning result.
4
Our Partner
The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI)
a non-profit organization working to strengthen and expand democracy worldwide
works with democrats in every region of the world to build political and civic organizations and safeguard elections
3000+ employees in 60+ countries around the world
chaired by former US Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright
5
Our Belief
Post conflict communities have taught us lessons ...
about reaching hard to access communities with severe socio-economic challenges
breaking down barriers of culture and language
innovative methodologies for quality control
... that could apply to Canada
Aboriginal communities, new Canadians
6
The Environment
"The increasing number of surveys and their frequency, I'd argue hasn't translated into a high quality of good understanding' of Muslims attitude and opinions."
David PollockWashington Institute for Near East PolicyToronto Star, June 15 2008
7
The Environment
"Autocratic regimes in [the Middle East] sometimes lean on surveyors and respondents to yield the results they want."
Prof. Mahmoud EidUniversity of OttawaToronto Star, June 15 2008 10 years of field experience in Egypt
8
at the height of the Maoist insurgency in Nepal in 2006, U.S. political researcher Stan Greenberg was hired to do nationwide sampling by an agency of the U.S. government. His local staff were kidnapped by the guerillas
the ransom demand?
his polling data.
they paid, but only with summaries, not the original data or analysis
The Environment
10
Sample Research Objectives WBG
test Palestinian leadership
ballot test preferences for PLC and
presidential elections
explore legitimacy of PA, emergency government,
Hamas
implications of Hamas takeover of
Gaza
strengths/weaknesses of Fateh
and Hamas
11
West Bank/Gaza Study
The study24 months, $750,000monthly quantitative, quarterly qualitative Most recent reportstudy of Palestinian Youth conducted in May/June 2008
Quantitativesurvey of 1200 respondents
Qualitative16 focus groups
12
Methodological Challenges
Sample completionvery difficult, especially in Gaza
Respondent confidencepeer approved response
Field reporting issuesquality and speed
13
Findings[Quant]
Only 17% employed25% male, 8% female,
Unemployment challenges 57% say 'few jobs’27% say discrimination
70% Politically inactive47% do not read newspaper 43% do not use Internet61% intend to vote
60% Connected to education32% high school23% university5% other
15
Focus Groups [Qual]
Deeper examination of reasons for political alienation, potential motivating messages
Study of possible alternative communications channels, role models, and message delivery
Consideration of believable 'life choices' messages
16
Discoveries
To be useful research needs to operate within a long-term structural framework
Regular sweeps of the same audiences are essential to track a fast moving environment
Quality assessment requires a professional accountable to NDI as well as a supporting local supplier
Reporting to local partners on a timely and transparent basis is essential to credibility and acceptance
18
Sample Research Objectives: Kosovo
Political party standings
Favourability of leaders
Identify potential election issues
Viability of various coalitions
Final status of Kosovo
Reconciliation
19
Kosovo Study
Annual qualitative review of issues, leaders and institutions
Election year quantitative issues and leader surveys
2003-20082005 & 2008 National election years
No comparable study of public opinionproviders work for embassies, packaged goods and parties but do not publish
20
Methodological Challenges
Data collectionreports of fraud in previous studiesperception of bias with local providers
Ethnic divideseparate research project design for Albanian and Serbian communities
Study timingsignificant international events impacting local public opinion happening on weekly basis
21
Findings[Quant]
Intention to vote droppingturn out dropping 7-10% each election
President’s popularity overwhelminghis party’s support decreasing
Status quo will not holdsignificant tensions brewing, positive attitudes toward international presence softening
Reconciliationno identifiable space for agreement on future status
22
Findings[Qual]
Leaders seen as corrupt but retained high favourability based on other criteria
Corruption is local & int’lsmall scale in schools and hospitals due to underfunding, large scale by foreigners
History of conflictrole in the war dictates national importance
Economicsthe key to progress and reconciliation
23
Discoveries
Political party support frozeninternational administration means elections are ‘not real’
Massive change afootsignificant urbanization and changing demography altering the values of the state(let)
Final status overwhelmsno space for domestic issues with Final Status looming, political leaders off the hook
Quality controleverything is political in Kosovo
24
How do you do research when ...
The environment is politically unstable ?
when the personal security risk is high ?
when families and individuals might be displaced ?
when national issues trump local and personal concerns ?
when clients, media and society are skeptical of your research ?
25
TechnicalChallenges
Quality controlcoping with no street addresses, bad phone numbers, long collection periods and difficult samples
Quantitativefinding partners and quality control measures to protect your data from collection to analysis
Qualitative identifying facilities, recruiters and moderators who can support your project
26
ProjectChallenges
Language
Cultural normsdifficulty of dialogue, transparency
Local custom and practicegender, clan/community, ethnicityhierarchygroup dynamics
Biasresearcher’s bias, actual or perceived
27
Audience(s)
Donorstrong point of view
Political parties and government(s)hyper-sensitivity to criticism
NGO’s, local media multiple users with diverse agendas
Societyfew established norms for debateintroduce issues important to society, but not debated by elite(s)
28
Research as Training
Make key audiences your partnerspolitical leadership, NGO’s, media
Observersto protect against biasto encourage the use of the data independently
Trainingwhat are the limits of the tools ? how can they be used ?
29
Emerging Tools
Low cost + broad access
OnlineFacebook in Egypt
SMSelection observation tooldominant mobile phone presencedynamic social network
Emailcommon use of ‘free mail’access to IM and telephony applications
31
Lessons for ‘Away’
The truth hurts do they want to know ?
Quality costs time & moneyredundancy and direct int’l participation needs to be built into your project plan
3. Scope & Scale you will need to set a long baseline, use multiple methodologies and accommodate unusually large research objectives
4. Reporting is teachingrole for media, NGO’s and clients
32
Lessons for ‘Home’
Special communities need a special approach balance of external and internal research team
Training has a benefitimproved confidence in results and the tool & a higher degree of ownership in the findings
Sample designhomogeneity of lifestyle over region or other cohort
Research | Strategy | Results
British Colonial Building, Third FloorEight Wellington St. E., Toronto, Canada M5E1C5direct 416-642-5000 email [email protected] 416-642-6435 web www.navltd.com
Chad Rogers