third five year review report five-year review report for ... • cwts construction water treatment...

64
SOWS DoclD THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For MW Manufacturing Superfund Site Valley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania AUGUST 2005 PREPARED BY United States Environmental Protection Agency Region III Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Approved by Date Abraham Ferdas Director Hazardous Site Cleanup Division US EPA Region III

Upload: vuongliem

Post on 24-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

SOWS DoclD

THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT

For

MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteValley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania

AUGUST 2005

PREPARED BY

United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion III

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Approved by Date

Abraham Ferdas DirectorHazardous Site Cleanup DivisionUS EPA Region III

Page 2: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Table of Contents

List of Acronyms nExecutive Summary vFive-Year Review Summary Form vu

I Introduction 1II Site Chronology 2III Background 5IV Remedial Actions 8V Progress Since Last Five Year Review 15VI Five-Year Review Process ' 16VII Technical Assessment 21VIII Issues 22IX Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions 23X Protectiveness Statement 23XI Next Review 23

Attachment A

Table 1 - Summary of VOCs in Ground Water SamplesTable 2 - Summary of VOCs in Passive Diffusion Bag Ground Water SamplesTable 3 - Natural Attenuation Indicator Parameters in Ground WaterTable 4 - Mauses Creek Stream Flow MeasurementsTable 5 - Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results VOCsTable 6 - Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results S VOCs and PCBsTable 7 - Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results Metals, Phosphorus and TSS

Figures

Figure 1 - Site Location MapFigure 2 - Site PlanFigure 3 - Ground Water Treatment System and Construction Water Treatment System

Process Flow DiagramFigure 4 - Overburden Ground Water Contour Map September 2004Figure 5 - Overburden Ground Water Contour Map December 2004Figure 6 - Shallow Bedrock Ground Water Contour Map September 2004Figure 7 - Shallow Bedrock Ground Water Contour Map December 2004

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review

Page 3: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

List of Acronyms

• ACOE U S Army Corps of Engineers

• AO Administrative Order

• ARARs Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements

• BAT Best Available Tecnnology

• BTAG Biological Technical Assistance Group

• CD Consent Decree

• CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, andLiability Act

• CFR Code of Federal Regulations

• CIC Community Involvement Coordinator

• cis-l,2-DCE cis-l,2-dichloroethene

• CSM Conceptual Site Model

• CWTS Construction Water Treatment System

• DOI Department of Interior

• E&S Erosion and Sediment

• EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

• ESD Explanation of Significant Differences

• FFS Focused Feasibility Study

• FS Feasibility Study

• gpm Gallons Per Minute

• GWTS Ground Water Treatment System

• 1C Institutional Control

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review 11

Page 4: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

• IGWE

• IRAK

• MCL

• MSC

• mg/kg

• mg/1

• NAPL

• NCP

• NFA

• NPDES

• NPL

• O&M

• OSHA

• OU

• PADEP

• PCB

• PCE

• PCOR

• PennDOT

• PEP

• PFD

• PP&L

Interim Ground Water Extraction

Interim Remedial Action Report

Maximum Contaminant Level

Medium Specific Concentration

milligrams per kilogram

milligram per htej-

Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution ContingencyPlan

No Further Action

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

National Priorities List

Operations and Maintenance

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Operable Unit

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Polychlonnated Biphenyl

Tetrachloroethene

Preliminary Close Out Report

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Performance Evaluation Plan

Process Flow Diagram

Pennsylvania Power and Light

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review 111

Page 5: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

• PRP

• PVC

• RA

• RACK

• RAO

• RD

• RI

• RI/FS

• ROD

• RP

• RPM

• SARA

• SVOC

• TCE

• TCLP

• TSS

• USFWS

• VOC

• VSL

• VC

• WBZ

Potentially Responsible Party

Polyvmyl Chloride

Remedial Action

Remedial Action Completion Report

Remedial Action Objective

Remedial Design /

Remedial Investigation

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

Record of Decision

Responsible Party

Remedial Project Manager

Superfund Amendments and Reauthonzation Act of 1986

Semivolatile Organic Compound

Tnchloroethene

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

Total Suspended Solids

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Volatile Organic Compound

Vegetative Support Layer

Vegetative Cover

Weathered Bedrock Zone

micrograms per liter

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review IV

Page 6: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Executive Summary

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing this Five YearReview report for the MW Manufacturing Superfund Site (the Site) pursuant to theComprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)section 121(c) and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution ContingencyPlan (NCP)

The purpose of a Five Year Review is to ensure that a remedial action remains protectiveof public health and the environment and is functioning as designed This document willbecome a part of the Site file

;

The Site is located in Valley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania The Site isapproximately 15 acres and is 4 miles northwest of Danville, Pennsylvania 700 feet \vestof State Route 54 and about 1A mile south of Interstate Route 80 The Site is a formermetal reclamation operation that was run by Metal Wire Manufacturing (MWManufacturing) MW Manufacturing reclaimed copper from wire and cable Plasticinsulation surrounding the cable and wire was either chemically or mechanically strippedor separated from the metal at the Site

The Site was listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on June 10, 1986 In August1988, EPA began Remedial Investigation (RI) and subsequently divided the Site in threeOperable Units (OUs) as follows

• OU-1 Ground water cleanup• OU-2 Carbon Pile Waste• OU-3 Fluff waste and Site soils

The above OU numbers and the descriptions were adopted in the WasteLan Howeverdunng the Remedial Design (RD) OUs numbers were assigned in chronological sequenceand additional OUs were added to facilitate RD and Remedial Action (RA) activitiesThus OU numbers were reassigned as follows

• OU-1 Carbon Pile Waste (completed in 1992, off-site treatment and disposal)• OU-2 Fluff waste and Site soils (Selected Remedy of incineration, OU 2 was

replaced by OU-5 in 1995)• OU-3 Ground water cleanup (construction completed in January 2005, operation

and maintenance is ongoing)• OU-4 Public Water Supply (completed in August 1996, and taken over by Valley

Township 1996)• OU-5 Fluff waste (previously addressed under OU-2), storage tanks, lagoon water

and sediments, and Site soils (previously addressed under OU-2) (constructioncompleted in June 2005)

• OU-6 Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Mam Plant Building(completed in 2001)

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review

Page 7: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

In this Five-Year Review, chronological OU numbers are used

The assessment of this Five Year Review found that the remedies for OU-3, OU 5 wereconstructed/implemented according to the objective of the applicable Record of Decision(ROD) Explanation of Significant Differences (ESDs) OU 6 (Unsafe Building Structureand Debris) was done according to a removal Consent Decree (CD) Sampling andhydraulic monitoring of ground water and surface water is being conducted as requiredby the OU-3 Final Design/Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) Sampling of treatedeffluent from the OU-3 GWTS is being conducted as required by the OU 3 NPDESEquivalency Permit The final cover construction/seeding of the OU-5 remedy wascompleted in June 2005 and will be inspected/repaired as required per the OU 5Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan Building demolition and debris removal forOU-6 was completed in 2001 The Site institutional controls (ICs) were partiallyimplemented under OU-6 by requiring the Site owner to place the removal CD in to thedeed records for the MW Manufacturing property For property located beyond the MWManufacturing Property boundary, the ICs will be implemented as required by the OU-5ROD Additionally, in August 1996, the Valley Township passed an ordinanceprohibiting installation of potable water wells throughout the township

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review VI

Page 8: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATION 1

Site name (from WasteLAN) MW Manufacturing Site

EPA ID (from WasteLAN) PAD98069 1372

Region State PennsylvaniIII

a City/County Valley Township,Montour County

SITE STATUS

NPL status X Final a Deleted a Other (specify)

Remediation status (choose all that apply) n Under Construction X Operating _ Complete

Multiple Oils?* XYes n No

Has site been put into reuse"7 a Yes X No

Construction Completion date

R E V I E W STATUS

Lead agency X EPA a State n Tnbe a Other Federal Agency

Author name Bhupi Khona

Author title Remedial Project Manager

Review period ** 5/20/05 to 7/13/05

Author Affiliation US EPA-Region 3

Date(s) of site inspection 5/26/05

Type of reviewX Post SARA n Pre SARA a NPL Removal only n,Non NPL Remedial Action Siten NPL State/Tribe lead a Regional Discretion

Review number a first n second X third

Triggering actionn Actual RA Onsite Construction at OU#a Construction Completiona Other (specify)

n other

a Actual RA Start at OU#X Previous Five Year Review Report

Triggering action date (from WasteLAN) 6/11/2000OU refers to operable unit

1 Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five Year Review in WasteLAN

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Vll

Page 9: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd

Issues

No major issues were found ICs for outside the property boundary of MW Manufacturingneed to be addressed for residential or commercial developments that may result in vaporintrusion exposure pathways

Recommendations/

Inform the Valley Township zoning office about the extent of the contaminated groundwater plume and recommend zoning restrictions to prevent any exposure pathways due tovapor intrusion

Protectiveness Statement(s)

The Site has been determined to be protective of human health and the environmentin the short-term because remaining direct exposure pathways have been eliminatedby remedial actions under OU-3, OU-5 and OU-6 The remedy is expected to befully protective of human health and the environment upon attainment of OU-3groundwater cleanup goals, which are expected to require at least 30 years to attainIn the interim, exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are beingcontrolled and ICs are preventing exposure to, or the ingestion of, contaminatedground water Placing the CD with the current property owner's deed record willprovide notice of potential risks and describe what would constitute unacceptablefuture use of the property All threats at the Site have been addressed throughtreatment and off-site disposal of highly contaminated materials including carbonwaste and NAPL-impacted soils, stabilization/backfill of Fluff/sediment/soils andcover of the area

Vapor intrusion is not a current issue since there is no residential housing on-site orwithin the ground water plume area Restrictions on the future use will preventpotential future exposure pathways

Long-term protectiveness of the remedial action will be verified by the OU-5 O&MPlan/Site Controls and OU-3 O&M Plan/Performance Evaluation Plan until theground water cleanup goals are achieved

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Vlll

Page 10: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Five-Year Review ReportFor

MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteValley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania

I Introduction

The purpose of the Five Year Review is to determine whether the remedy at a Site isprotective of human health and the environment The methods findings and conclusionsof reviews are documented in Five-Year Review reports In addition, Five Year Reviewreports identify issues found during the review if any, and recommendations to addressthem '

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing this Five YearReview report pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation,and Liability Act (CERCLA) §121(c) and the National Oil and Hazardous SubstancesPollution Contingency Plan (NCP) CERCLA § 121 states

If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substancespollutants or contaminants remaining at the site the President shall review suchremedial action no less often than each Jive years after the initiation of suchremedial action to assure that human health and the environment are beingprotected by the remedial action being implemented In addition if upon suchreview it is the judgement of the President that action is appropriate at such site inaccordance with section [104] or [106] the President shall take or require suchaction The President shall report to the Congress a list of facilities for -which suchreview is required the results of all such reviews and any actions taken as a resultof such reviews

The Agency interpreted this requirement further in the NCP, 40 Code of FederalRegulations (CFR) 300 430(f)(4)(u) states

If a remedial action is selected that results in. hazardous substances pollutants orcontaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use andunrestricted exposure the lead agency shall review such action no less often thanevery five years after the initiation of the selected remedial action

The EPA Region III has conducted a Five-Year Review of the remedial actionsimplemented at the MW Manufacturing Superfund Site in Valley Township, MontourCounty, Pennsylvania (the Site) The review was conducted from May 2005 to July2005 This report documents the results of the review Nassau Metals Corp and itsconsultant provided ground water monitoring and other data as required

The Site was listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on June 10, 1986 In August1988, EPA began Remedial Investigation (RI) and subsequently divided the Site in threeOperable Units (OUs) as follows

M W Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 1 of 23

Page 11: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

OU-1 Ground water cleanupOU-2 Carbon Pile WasteOU-3 Fluff waste and Site soils

The above OU numbers and the descriptions were adopted in the WasteLan Howeverduring the Remedial Design (RD) OU numbers were assigned chronological sequenceand additional OUs were added to facilitate RD and Remedial Action (RA) activitiesThus OU numbers were reassigned as follows

• OU-1 Carbon Pile Waste (completed m 1992, off-site treatment and disposal)• OU-2 Fluff waste and Site soil^ (Selected Remedy of incineration OU 2 was

replaced by OU-5 in 1995)• OU-3 Ground water cleanup (construction completed in January 2005 operation

and maintenance is ongoing)• OU-4 Public Water Supply (completed in August 1996, and taken over by Valley

Township 1996)• OU-5 Fluff waste (previously addressed under OU-2), storage tanks, lagoon water

and sediments, and Site soils (previously addressed under OU-2) (constructioncompleted in June 2005)

• OU-6 Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Main Plant Building(completed in 2001)

Jji this Five-Year Review, chronological OU numbers are used

This is the Third Five-Year Review for the Site The triggering action for this review isthe Second Five-Year Review dated June 15, 2000 as shown in EPA s WasteLANdatabase

EPA Region III has conducted this review of the remedial actions implemented at the Sitedue to the fact that hazardous substances pollutants or contaminants remain at the Siteabove levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure This review wasconducted for the entire Site by the Remedial Project Manager (RPM), and it includes areview based on the recent (2005) completion of remedial action construction for theactive Operable Units (OU-3 and OU-5), and a review of the OU 6 removal actioncompleted in 2001 A detailed review of the performance assessment and remedial actionobjectives for OU-3 and OU-5 will be provided m the next 5-Year Review when moredata are available

II Site Chronology

Table 1 lists the chronology of events for the MW Manufacturing Site

Table 1 Chronology of Site EventsDate1966

EventMetal Wire Manufacturing (MW Manufacturing) acquired the property

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 2 of 23

Page 12: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

1966

1972

1976

1981 1982

Late 1982

October 1 1984

June 10 1986

February 1987

August 1988

March 1989

March 6 1989

June 1990

1992

March 1992

May 19, 1992

June 20 1992

September 30, 1992

March 31 1993

MW Manufacturing used the property for the chemical and mechanicalseparation of copper wire from its plastic insulationMW Manufacturing filed for protection under Chapter 1 1 of the UnitedStates Bankruptcy Code and Philadelphia National Bank acquired thepropertyWarehouse 8 1 Inc and Domino Salvage acquired the propertyWarehouse 8 1 Inc and Domino Salvage reportedly used the property forthe mechanical separation of copper wire from its plastic insulationPennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) inspectedthe Site installed four monitoring wells and collected ground watersamplesWarehouse 81 Inc retained Dunn Geoscience Corp to evaluate conditionsat the Site ,The Site was proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL)

The Site was placed on the NPL

A Removal Consent Order was signed by the EPA and the current Siteproperty owners (Michael G Sabia and Michael G Sabia Jr doingbusiness as Warehouse 81 Limited Partnership) The current Site propertyowners were directed to supply water to the person living on site and tokeep records of the water supply for 5 yearsThe EPA began the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) afterthe current Site property owners elected not to participate Following thecompletion of the RI/FS the EPA divided response actions at the Site intosix OUsOU 1 EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) which selected off siteincineration for the carbon waste as the remedy for OU 1EPA sent a Special Notice Letter to conduct the Remedial Design andRemedial Action (RD/RA) to the current Site property owners whoelected not to participateOU 2 EPA issued a ROD for OU 2 which addressed Fluff impactedsoils and impacted lagoon water at the SiteAdditional PRP investigations discovered records that led to identificationof Nassau Metals Corp (Nassau) and Pennsylvania Power and Light(PP&L) as additional Potential -Responsible Parties (PRPs)OU-1 The excavation and off site incineration of the carbon waste fromOU-1 was completed by the EPAEPA sent Nassau and PP&L a general notice letter regarding theirpotential liability for the SiteOU-3 EPA issued a ROD for OU 3 which addresses ground watercontaminationOU 3 EPA sent Nassau PP&L and the current Site property owners aSpecial Notice Letter which informed the PRPs that the EPA was willingto enter into a federal Consent Decree (CD) to conduct the RD/RAcontemplated by the OU-3 ROD The current Site owners did not respondto the Special Notice LetterOU 3 A Unilateral Administrative Consent Order was issued to each PRPto conduct the RD/RA for OU 3 Nassau and PP&L agreed to conduct theRD/RA for OU 3 During the design phase EPA decided to split OU 3into two OUs OU 3 and OU-4 OU 3 addresses the long term ground

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 3 of 23

Page 13: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

December 1992

1993 1995

October 1993

March 1994

November 1995

1996 1998

August 1996

April to September1996

December 22 1997

October 2000

October 2000 toFebruary 2001

September 27, 2000

November toDecember 2002October 2003

November 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

water remedy, and OU-4 provided for public water to potentially affectedresidents and businessesOU 2 Nassau petitioned the EPA to reopen the OU 2 ROD

OU 2 Nassau undertook a series of studies to evaluate an alternateremedy for the Site EPA continued to pursue the Remedial Design forOU2OU 2 EPA reopened the public comment period and Nassau submittedcomments to supplement their petition to reopen the OU 2 RODEPA agreed to consider alternatives proposed by Nassau provided thatNassau conduct a treatabihty study and a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS)to re evaluate the remedial alternatives Meanwhile EPA continues withthe OU 2 treatabihty studyOU 2 EPA completed treatabihty study revealed that the selected remedyfor OU 2 had the potential for adverse impacts on human health andenvironment Ultimately EPA abandoned the OU 2 remedy involvingincineration and instead selected the OU 5 remedy involving stabilizationand solidification of Fluff and contaminated soils a remediationtechnology similar to that proposed by NassauOU-3 Nassau conducted a senes of Pre Design Investigation activities forOU3OU-4 Construction of a 17 400 foot public water distribution systemthroughout Valley Township was completed by Nassau providing water to39 residences and 13 commercial establishments The water distributionsystem was turned over to Valley Township in 1996EPA conducted a removal action to remove miscellaneous drums andbuckets containing hazardous materials for off site disposalOU 5 EPA issued a ROD for OU 5 (formerly OU 2) revising the 1990ROD for OU 2 The OU 5 ROD called for ex situ stabilization of theFluff lagoon sediment and surface soils and backfilling of the excavatedareas with the stabilized material Additionally OU 5 provides for the offsite disposal of tank and drum contents and other debns remaining at theSiteRemoval CD was signed between EPA and current Site property ownersMichael G Sabia and Michael G Sabia Jr involving Demolition ofunsafe portions of the western third of the Mam Plant BuildingDemolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Mam PlantBuilding by the current Site property ownersOU-3 EPA issued an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) forOU-3OU-3 Implementation of the OU-3 IGWE Program

OU-5 Final (100%) RD Report was approved by EPA and PADEP

OU 3/OU 5 Construction of the new water treatment building wasinitiated for the CWTS and the GWTSOU 5 Construction of the new water treatment building was substantiallycompleteOU 5 The construction of CWTS was completed and commissioned totreat OU 5 construction waterOU 3 GWTS Design (with OU 5 CWTS) was approved by EPA and

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 4 of 23

Page 14: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

March/ April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

October 2004

September 2004

December 2004

December 2004

December 2004 toJanuary 2005

January 17 2005

January 21 2005

February 1 1 2005

April 15 2005

April 28 2005

May 23 2005

May 24 2005

May 26 2005

May 27, 2005

PADEP

OU 6 The remainder of the Main Plant Building was razed and disposedof off site as part of Operable Unit 6 (OU 6) by Sabia The StorageBuilding (Butler Building) was modified for use as a temporary chemicaland material storage building as part of the OU 3 remedyOU 5 CWTS was commissioned and startup was completed

OU 3/OU 5 Installation of chemical bulk storage area in the existingStorage Building (Butler Building) was completedOU-5 RA site excavation and stabilization activities completed

EPA issued ESD #1 for OU 5

OU 5 RA activities substantially complete and site wmtenzation forerosion and sediment (E&S) protection (outstanding work includes finalvegetative support layer (VSL) tppsoil and E&S controls)OU 3 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)Equivalency Permit for OU 3 GWTS was issued by PADEPOU 3/OU 5 OU 5 CWTS was cleaned and changed in service to that ofthe longer term OU 3 GWTSOU 3 Startup and operation of the OU 3 recovery wells and GWTScommencedOU 3 Written request was submitted to EPA and PADEP to providenotice of completion of the OU 3 RA Construction Phase and requestedperformance of the OU 3 Administrative Order requiring Start up and PreCertification InspectionsOU 3 Ground Water Treatment System Operation and MaintenanceManual revised for longer term OU 3 treatmentOU-3 Interim Remedial Action Report for Operable Unit #3 wascompletedOU 3 EPA/PADEP approval of March 17 2005 Report granted

OU 3 EPA acceptance of April 15 2005 Interim Remedial Action Reportfor Operable Unit #3OU 5 Written request was submitted to EPA and PADEP to providenotice of completion of the OU 5 RA Construction Phase and requestedperformance of the OU 5 Consent Decree requiring Pre ConstructionInspectionsEPA/PADEP conducted Five Year Review and OU 5 Pre CertificationInspection for both the Completion of the RA and Completion of the Workfor the SiteOU 3 OU-3 Performance Assessment Baseline Monitoring Report wassubmitted which documents 2 quarters of baseline ground water samplingand hydraulic monitoring and the baseline off site wetland evaluations

III Background

Physical Characteristics

The Site is located in Valley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania (Figure 1) and

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 5 of 23

Page 15: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

occupies approximately 15 acres of land about 4 miles northwest of DanvillePennsylvania The area around the Site is within the Valley and Ridge physiographicprovince, characterized by a series of linear northeast trending mountains that formalternating valleys and ndges The Site is located in a broad stream valley created byMauses Creek, about 1A mile east of the Site near State Route 54 (Washingtonville Road)Mauses Creek drains to the south and empties into the Susquehanna River at DanvilleFormer Site facilities (a large one-story building and small out buildings two above groundstorage tanks, and other features) were demolished and removed in 2004 during OU 5remedial activities A smaller 3,350 square foot building was retained and renovated forchemical storage as part of the on-site GWTS currently in operation as part of OU 3remedial activities, in addition to the new GWTS building constructed in 2004

/In this part of the State, retreating late Pleistocene glaciers deposited a layer of till(unconsohdated deposits of clay, with intermixed sand, gravel, and silt) ranging up to 40 feetthick These glacial deposits overlie sedimentary bedrock consisting of layered sequences ofPaleozoic shale and limestone Bedrock beneath areas south of the Site includes units of theWills Creek Formation, consisting of thin, interbedded calcareous silty shale and siltstone orargillaceous (shaly) limestone and dolostone Bedrock to the north of the Site consists of theTonoloway Formation, a dark gray, laminated limestone A transition zone between thesetwo formations, characterized by extensive interfingenng is mapped beneath the northernpart of the Site, making identification of the Tonoloway Wills Creek contact difficult Thebedrock layers in the vicinity of the Site strike approximately N80°E and dip to thenorthwest at an angle of about 25 degrees Bedrock underlying the Site is moderatelyfractured, with fracture frequency diminishing with depth These fractures are generallyoriented parallel to bedding planes and dip to the northwest

Ground water at the Site is present in the glacial overburden and the bedrock In theoverburden, ground water occurs within discontinuous gravel lenses within the till and adistinct layer of weathered bedrock at the base of the overburden, however thispredominantly clay unit is generally not very permeable Ground water in the overburdenat the Site is typically encountered at a depth of about 7 to 8 feet below grade Groundwater in the bedrock is present primarily in fractures or bedding planes Most of thesewater-bearing fractures are in the shallow bedrock (upper 30 to 40 feet below grade)Ground water at the Site generally flows from west to east, towards Mauses Creek

There are two small wetland areas located on the MW Manufacturing property One isnear the south fence line and other one is near the north fence line On the east side,towards Mauses Creek, larger discrete wetland areas are located outside the MWManufacturing property

Land and Resource Use

The Site is situated in a relatively rural area northwest of Danville, except for nearbycommercial development at the intersection of Old Valley School Road and Route 54,approximately V2 mile south of Interstate 80 There are a number of commercialproperties (several motels, a gas station, and several restaurants) located near theintersection of Routes 54 and 1-80, as well as a few private residences The Pennsylvania

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 6 of 23

Page 16: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Department of Transportation (PennDOT) maintains a maintenance and storage areaimmediately north of the Site and a cement plant is located northwest of the Site TheSite is bordered on the west and south by farmlands and wooded lots Approximately V*mile southeast of the Site is the Village of Mausdale, a residential area comprised ofabout 24 homes

History of Contamination

MW Manufacturing engaged in secondary copper recovery from scrap wire, using bothmechanical and chemical processes, until it ceased operations in the early 1970 s In1972, MW Manufacturing filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United StatesBankruptcy Code, and Philadelphia National Bank acquired the property The Site iscurrently inactive, partly due to legal actions by PADEP (formerly known as thePennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources) PADEP records indicate thatMr Allan Levin of Doylestown, Pennsylvania, proprietor of MW Manufacturing, ownedthe property from about 1966 to 1972

The chemical recovery process reportedly employed the use of a hot vegetable oil bath tomelt the polyvmyl chloride (PVC) plastic insulation away from the scrap copper wireChlorinated solvents such as tetrachloroethene (PCE) were then used to remove theresidual oil from the separated copper The mechanical recovery process consisted of theshredding of wire and the generation of 'Fluff waste The Fluff waste consisted offibrous insulation material mixed with bits of plastic and copper

Warehouse 81 Inc acquired the Site in 1976 Subsequently, Warehouse 81 Inc andDomino Salvage, Inc formed a limited partnership to recover wire at the Site Recordsindicate that the only activities conducted by the Warehouse 81/Domino Salvagepartnership were mechanical recovery operations

The Main Plant Building (demolished in March/April 2004) at the Site consisted of asingle large building which occupied approximately one acre of the property The MamPlant Building concrete floor and foundation remain A smaller Storage Building (ButlerBuilding), which occupies approximately 3,350 square feet to the south of the Main PlantBuilding, has been modified for use as a temporary chemical and material storagebuilding as part of the OU-3 remedy The remainder of the Site, prior to implementationof the OU-3 and OU-5 remedies, consisted of open land, piles of Fluff and a smallsurface water impoundment Currently, the mam portion of the Site is fenced and accessto the Site is restricted A Site Plan showing current conditions at the Site is provided inFigure 2

Initial Response

Investigations of environmental conditions at the Site began in the early 1980s In 1981-1982, PADEP inspected the Site, installed four monitoring wells, and collected groundwater samples, in late 1982, Warehouse 81 retained Dunn Geoscience Corporation(Dunn) to evaluate conditions at the Site Dunn installed additional ground water

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 7 of 23

Page 17: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

momtonng wells and sampled soils and ground water as part of this preliminaryinvestigation

The Site was proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL) on October 1, 1984 and wasplaced on the NPL on June 10, 1986 In February 1987, a Removal Consent Order wassigned by the EPA and the current owners of the Site Michael G Sabia and Michael GSabia, Jr doing business as Warehouse 81 Limited Partnership were directed to supplywater to a person living on-site and to keep records of the water supply for 5 years

Basis for Taking Action

Former disposal practices contaminated the on-site and off-site ground water surfacewater, soil and sediments with volatile organic compounds 32,000 cubic yards of Fluffcontaining lead and Bis(2 ethylhexyl) Phthalates generated during the dry recoveryprocess were left at the Site

IV Remedial Actions

A PRP search was conducted for the Site As a result of this search, EPA determined thatthe previous owners and operators of the Site had gone out of business EPA notifiedcurrent owners of the Site, Michael G Sabia and Michael G Sabia, Jr, doing business asWarehouse 81 Limited Partnership, of their potential liability at the Site and offered themthe opportunity to conduct the RI/FS, but they elected not to participate EPA conductedthe RI/FS beginning in August 1988 Following the completion of the RI/FS EPAdivided response actions at the Site into six Operable Units (OUs) OU-1 addresses thecarbon waste that has been left on-site from the copper recovery process In March 1989,EPA issued a ROD which selected off-site incineration for the carbon waste as theremedy for OU 1 A Special Notice Letter to conduct the RD/RA for OU-1 was sent toWarehouse 81 on March 6, 1989 Again, Warehouse 81 declined to participate Theexcavation and off-site incineration of the carbon waste was completed by EPA in March1992

Additional PRP investigations in 1992 discovered records that led to identification ofNassau and PP&L as additional PRPs A general notice letter regarding their Potentialliability for the Site was sent to Nassau and PP&L on May 19,1992

EPA issued the ROD for OU-2 in June 1990 This ROD addressed the Fluff, impactedsoils and impacted lagoon water at the Site In December 1992, Nassau petitioned EPAto reopen the OU-2 ROD EPA reopened the public comment period in October 1993and Nassau submitted comments to supplement their petition to reopen the ROD InMarch 1994, EPA agreed to consider alternatives proposed by Nassau provided thatNassau conduct a treatabihty study and a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) to re-evaluatethe remedial alternatives Between 1993-1995, Nassau undertook a series of studies toevaluate an alternate remedy for the Site During this period, EPA continued to pursuethe Remedial Design (RD) of the OU-2 remedy During the RD for OU-2 a series oftreatabihty studies involving incineration of Fluff and contaminated soils were

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 8 of 23

Page 18: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

conducted The treatabihty studies, which were completed in November 1995 revealedthat the selected remedy for OU-2 had the potential for adverse impacts on human healthand environment Ultimately, EPA abandoned the OU 2 remedy involving incinerationand instead selected the OU-5 remedy involving stabilization and solidification of Fluffand contaminated soils, a remediation technology similar to that proposed by NassauThus, the OU 5 remedy addresses the Site contaminants previously addressed under OU-2

On June 30, 1992, EPA issued the ROD for OU-3, which addresses ground watercontamination On September 30, 1992, EPA sent Special Notice Letters to NassauPP&L and Warehouse 81 and its general partner, Michael G Sabia Sr which informedthose PRPs that the EPA was willing to, enter into a federal consent decree to conduct theRD/RA contemplated by the OU-3 ROD Warehouse 81 and Michael G Sabia Sr didnot respond to the Special Notice letter On March 31, 1993, a Unilateral AdministrativeOrder was issued to each PRP to conduct the RD/RA for OU-3 Nassau and PP&Lagreed to conduct the RD/RA for OU-3

The remaining discussions of Remedy Selection, Remedy Implementation and SystemOperation and Maintenance are organized by Operable Units

OU-1 - Carbon Waste Pile

Remedy Selection - EPA s selected remedy for OU-1 - Carbon Waste Pile consisted ofcompleting the following tasks

1 Excavation and off-site incineration of on-site carbon waste pile2 Removal and off site incineration of PCB contaminated waste

Remedy Implementation The remedy, successfully completed on March 13 1992,involved consolidation, loading, and off site transportation and incineration of the carbonwaste pile (approximately 875 cubic yards) and approximately 800 drums of PCBcontaminated waste ,

System Operation and Maintenance The EPA issued a Remedial Action CompletionReport (RACR) on September 30, 1992, which stated that No Further Action (NFA) isrequired under OU-1 Therefore, the OU-1 remedy does not involve ongoing treatmentsystems or maintenance operations

OU-2 - Fluff Waste and Site Soils (replaced by OU-5 in 1995)

EPA conducted a series of treatabihty studies which revealed that the selected remedy forOU-2 had the potential for adverse impacts on human health and environment Therefore,EPA abandoned the OU-2 remedy involving incineration and instead selected the OU-5remedy involving stabilization and solidification of Fluff and contaminated soils, aremediation technology similar to that proposed by Nassau

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 9 of 23

Page 19: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

OU-3 - Ground Water

Remedy Selection - From 1996 to 1998, a series of Pre Design Investigation activitieswere conducted for OU-3 by Nassau The principal objectives of the OU-3 Pre DesignInvestigation activities were to

1 Acquire additional ground water quality and water level data at the Site and from thesurrounding areas to fill data gaps regarding the extent of ground water impacts andthe direction of ground water flow

2 Further assess the hydrogeologic setting which influences ground water conditions at,and adjacent to, the Site

3 Evaluate the anticipated ground watej treatment efficiencies through bench-scaletreatabihty studies

Based on the conclusions from the Pre Design Investigations as subsequentlydocumented in the December 2001 Pre-Design Investigation Report (O Bnen & Gere)an updated conceptual model of the Site conditions was developed This updatedConceptual Site Model (CSM) indicated the following

1 The primary environmental impacts at the Site result from volatile organiccompounds (VOCs) present within ground water in the overburden and shallowbedrock beneath and east of the Site

2 The highest degree of contamination is found in the overburden and shallow bedrockzones

3 Ground water flow in the overburden generally has a downward component towardsthe more conductive shallow bedrock zone, and an upward component from deeperbedrock towards the shallow bedrock zone

4 The hydrogeologic setting effectively contains the impacted ground water to adefined area The containment of impacted ground water is a function of topographicfeatures, the orientation of the bedrock strike, dipping beds, hydraulic gradients(including upward vertical flow within the bedrock and the discharge of ground waterto the creek system) The ground water hydraulic gradient indicates that MausesCreek is functioning as a discharge barrier to ground water flow

5 Migration of contamination has been further reduced by the installation of a publicwater supply in 1996 which effectively eliminated known ground water withdrawalfor potable use in the vicinity of the plume

6 Concentrations of VOCs in ground water are expected to slowly decrease in futureyears as a function of ground water remediation in conjunction with naturalattenuation, including degradation and dilution within the aquifer, and volatilizationin the surface water environment

EPA issued an BSD dated September 27, 2000 to explain the different approach forground water cleanup The major differences to OU-3 remedial objectives, as explainedby the September 2000 ESD, are summarized below

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 10 of 23

Page 20: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

1 On-site extraction of impacted ground water from the VOC plume at the Siteutilizing an overburden interceptor trench in addition to vertical bedrock extractionwells in the source area The original OU 3 ROD called for ground water extractionusing only vertical extraction wells

2 Ground water cleanup levels were changed from background to MaximumContaminant Levels (MCLs) promulgated as the EPA drinking water standards orMedium Specific Concentrations (MSCs) set forth in the Pennsylvania LandRecycling and Environmental Remediation Standards Act (Act 2), whichever is morestringent

Based on the preliminary modeling conducted in 1999, the September 2000 ESDconceptual remedial design utilized an overburden interceptor trench with additionalground water extraction from bedrock wells, where beneficial The ESD alsodocumented that more refined ground water modeling (during remedial design) would beconducted to evaluate the ability of trench design to meet the remedial objectivesTherefore, consistent with the ESD, the ground water flow model was refined during thePreliminary (30%) RD based on the 2001 Preliminary Design Investigation (PDI)activities The refined ground water model incorporated additional Site data such aswetland topography, depth to bedrock, hydraulic parameters, and evaluated alternativeground water extraction options in addition to the overburden interceptor trench

As detailed in the December 2001 30% RD Report, based on the CSM, it was decidedthat the OU-3 remedy would move forward utilizing shallow bedrock extraction wells toimplement on-site hydraulic control of overburden and bedrock ground water with thehighest VOC concentrations This represented a modification to the remedial design,while maintaining consistency with the OU-3 ROD/ESD RA objectives The rationalefor this modification is summarized as follows

• Under natural conditions, a downward hydraulic gradient exists from the overburdento the shallow bedrock Therefore, the natural flow conditions will be enhanced byshallow bedrock extraction to capture overburden ground water Shallow bedrockextraction can be designed to provide the same measure of overburden hydrauliccontrol as the overburden extraction scenarios evaluated

• With any practical on-site ground water extraction scheme the majority of water isextracted through the shallow bedrock zone Vertical extraction wells are the mostpractical and economical means to extract bedrock ground water Also, the flexibilityof the vertical well ground water extraction system, in terms of extraction locations,and adjustment to these locations, is greatly improved compared to a horizontal wellor trench system

• The updated CSM indicates that ground water from the shallow bedrock zonerepresents the greatest contribution to discharge and VOC mass flux to MausesCreek By performing extraction from the shallow bedrock zone, the reduction inVOC migration loading can be optimized

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 11 of 23

Page 21: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Remedy Implementation

The OU-3 Pre-Fmal (90%) RD Report was divided into two, to facilitate the fast trackturnkey design/build construction of the OU-5 CWTS/OU 3 GWTS Accordingly thePre-Fmal (90%) GWTS Design, providing the detailed design of the OU 5 CWTS/OU-3GWTS and relevant hydrogeologic aspects of the remedy, was completed in December2003 This allowed the OU-5 GWTS/OU-3 GWTS turnkey construction as previouslydescribed, to take place The second part of the OU-3 90% RD Addendum Report, wascompleted on July 30, 2004 and provided the remaining required supporting detailedhydrogeologic information and performance assessment criteria as part of the overallOU-3 90% Remedial Design Thus the 100% Final RD was completed on July 30 2004

iDunng December 2004 and early January 2005, the OU-5 CWTS was cleaned andchanged in service to that of the longer-term OU-3 ground water treatment system TheOU-5 CWTS is largely identical to the OU-3 GWTS, except two additional watertreatment unit processes not required for the OU-3 GWTS (chemical enhancedprecipitation and granular activated carbon adsorption) were provided for treatment ofOU-5 generated construction waters that were removed A PFD of the OU-3 GWTS isprovided as Figure 3 These two unit operations were bypassed during the retrofitSpecifically, the final OU-3 GWTS consists of the following unit processes

• Flow Equalization• Bag and Cartridge Filtration• pH Adjustment and/or sequestenng agent addition• Ultraviolet/Chemical enhanced (with hydrogen peroxide) oxidation (UV/Chemox)• Counter Current Air Stripping• Final pH adjustment• Solids Conditioning• Solids dewatenng with a plate and frame filter press until processing with the filter

press is no longer needed

As detailed in the OU-3 Final Design, ground water .extraction is being implemented withfive ground water collection/recovery wells shallow bedrock wells Dunn 8 and EX-1,and overburden/weathered bedrock wells OEX-1, OEX-3 and OEX 4

In December 2004, an NPDES Equivalency Permit for the OU-3 treatment system treateddischarge was issued by PADEP As of the May 26, 2005 5-Year Review Inspection inexcess of 3 8 million gallons of ground water were collected, treated, and discharged toMauses Creek in compliance with the OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit

Startup and operation of the OU-3 recovery wells and GWTS commenced on January 17,2005 and will continue to operate as planned Current set pumping rates from the groundwater collection/recovery wells are as follows

Dunn-8 15 gpm OEX 1 1 5 gpm OEX-4 1 5 gpmEX 1 10 gpm OEX 3 1 5 gpm

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 12 of 23

Page 22: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

To date, it has been observed that Dunn 8 EX 1 and OEX-3 pumps typically operatecontinuously, whereas the pumps for OEX 1 and OEX-4 typically operate cyclically dueto evacuation and recharge of these two wells (both set at their minimum pumpwithdrawal rates)

On February 17, 2005 EPA, PADEP, Nassau and O Bnen & Gere performed a joint start-up and pre certification inspection It was determined by all parties that the OU 3treatment system was functional, operational and performing as designed

System Operation and Maintenance (Q&M) Subsequent to commencement of full scaleOU-3 ground water collection and treatment system operations on January 17 2005 theOU-3 remedy moved from a completed, RA phase into a long term O&M phase TheO&M manual for the OU-3 GWTS has been prepared which identifies routine operationand maintenance tasks that must be performed to continue efficient operation of the OU 3ground water collection and treatment system This includes equipment maintenance,data logging and routine and non-routine tasks associated with operation andmaintenance of a system of this nature The OU-3 GWTS O&M manual was reviewedby EPA during the February 17, 2005 joint start-up and pre certification inspection It ismaintained on-site and is continually being updated as found necessary based oncontinuation of on-going operations

The treatment system effluent is sampled twice per month as required by PADEP for theparameters specified in the OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit Discharge MonitoringReports are submitted to EPA and PADEP on a monthly basis

Intra-process sampling is also being conducted in order to further optimize unit processefficiencies and, as necessary, to be used in development of Best Available Technology(BAT) discharge limitations with PADEP near the end of the first operating year

Effectiveness of the treatment system operations under the OU-3 NPDES EquivalencyPermit has been clearly demonstrated Treated discharge samples collected on January24, 2005 (and twice per month since) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds(VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), total and dissolved metalspolychlormated biphenyls (PCBs), total suspended solids (TSS), and pH These results,and daily average flow, have all been well within the discharge limits specified byPADEP in the NPDES OU-3 Equivalency Permit

Long-term OU-3 Performance Monitoring activities will be conducted pursuant to theJuly 2004 Final (100%) RD which includes the OU-3 Performance Evaluation Plan(PEP), while the long-term OU-3 GWTS O&M activities will be completed pursuant tothe Final (100%) RD and Site O&M Manual

OU-4 - Public Water Supply

Remedy Selection EPA's selected remedy for OU-4 public water supply consisted of thedesign and installation of a public water supply for certain residences and businesses

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 13 of 23

Page 23: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Remedy Implementation Construction of a 17,400 ft water transmission mam throughoutValley Township was completed in 1996 providing water to 39 residences and 133commercial establishments

System Operation and Maintenance The public water supply system is operating asdesigned providing safe dnnking water to the residences and commercial establishmentsThe O&M of the public water system has been taken over by the Valley Township WaterAuthority and it is being operated in compliance with the Commonwealth ofPennsylvania Dnnking Water Regulations

OU-5 - Fluff Waste, Storage Tanks, Lagoon Water/Sediments and Site Soils

Remedy Selection For OU-5, Nassau conducted a Focused Feasibility Study andtreatability study from 1993-1995 to demonstrate the viability of other remedies EPAreviewed this work and issued a ROD on December 22, 1997, revising the 1990 decisiondocument This new ROD called for the ex situ (removed from the ground) stabilizationof the Fluff, lagoon sediment and surface soils and the backfilling of the excavated areaswith the stabilized material The remedy called for stabilized areas to be graded in amanner to prevent ponding and promote drainage of precipitation away from and off ofthe stabilized mass The OU-5 ROD calls for the stabilized material to be covered withtwo feet of clean soil, comprised of an 18-inch thick vegetative support layer and sixinches of topsoil The topsoil will be seeded, with the resulting vegetation being used toanchor and prevent erosion of the surficial soils The final OU-5 remedy provides forunsaturated soils contaminated with Non-Aqueous-Phase Liquid (NAPL) to beexcavated, characterized and disposed of off-site at a permitted facility AdditionallyOU-5 provides for tank and drum contents and other debns remaining at the Site to betransported off-site to appropriate facilities Implementation/enforcement of ICsincluding, but not limited to deed restrictions (institutional controls to prohibitinterference with the remedial actions and to prevent exposure to soil and ground watercontamination) and fencing, as well as continued monitoring and implementation of along-term OU-5 O&M program, will provide, for Site security and long termprotectiveness During the initial remedial activities, it was observed that the soils underthe fluff pile were very clayey and did not seem to be impacted by fluff In September2004, EPA issued ESD#1 to modify the requirement of excavating 2 feet of soil under theFluff pile and mixing with the stabilization mass The change required excavating onlythe soils where core samples of the soils underneath Fluff indicated presence of fluff

Remedy Implementation The Final (100%) RD for OU-5 was completed in October2003 Construction of a new water treatment building was initiated in November 2003and substantially completed in January 2004 Construction of the OU-5 CWTS, beinghoused in the new water treatment building, was initiated in February 2004 and wascompleted with system commissioning and startup in May 2004 Construction of thebuned treated discharge line, running from the treatment plant to Mauses Creek, was alsoaccomplished during this construction period Installation of a chemical bulk storage area

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 14 of 23

Page 24: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

in the existing Storage Building (Butler Building) to support the OU 5 CWTS/OU 3GWTS was completed in June 2004

The OU-5 CWTS was built, in part, to provide for the treatment of construction waterderived during implementation of the OU-5 RA Construction waters treated includedpotentially impacted storm water as well as waters collected from performance of OU 5RA from de-watering and decontamination activities A PFD of the OU 5 CWTS isprovided as Figure 3

The OU-5 RA Contractor (Weston Solutions, Inc) was awarded the RA contract inFebruary 2004 for performing the remediation of the Fluff, soil, sediment and remainingdebns associated with the OU-5 remedy The OU-5 RA Contractor mobilized to the Sitein May 2004 and substantially completed construction (except final grading, topsoil andseeding) of the OU-5 RA activities by the time of winter shutdown in December 2004Upon re-mobilization in the spring of 2005, remaining OU-5 RA activities werecompleted These activities consisted of performing final grading, installing a six-inchlayer of topsoil over the already installed 18-inch thick vegetative support layer (VSL)seeding, and transition from temporary to final erosion and sediment control measuresonce the vegetative cover was established

The OU-5 CWTS was utilized to treat OU-5 derived construction waters from June untilDecember 2004 During that time, approximately 2,252,848 gallons of treated water wastreated and discharged to Mauses Creek under an NPDES equivalency permit issued byPADEP for the OU-5 CWTS No violations of the NPDES equivalency permitconditions occurred dunng the OU 5 CWTS operational period

System Operation and Maintenance The OU-5 O&M basically consists of ongoing,periodic inspections for E&S controls and to confirm growth in the vegetative cover inthe short term, and inspections/repairs as needed to maintain the soil cover/site controlsand inspections to observe for animals burrowing/holes per the OU-5 O&M Plan for thelong-term maintenance

OU-6 - Building Demolition and Debris Removal

Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Main Plant Building andremoval of debns was done under a removal CD with current Site property owners

Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Mam Plant Building by thecurrent Site property owners was conducted in the fall of 2000 In April 2004, theproperty owners razed the remainder of the Main Plant Building and disposed of thedemolition debns off-site due to safety concerns for RA contractor workers

V Progress Since Last Five-Year Review

Dunng the previous Five-Year Review performed in July 2000, the remedies for OU-2and OU-4 were found to be protective of human health and the environment It also

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 15 of 23

Page 25: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

concluded that remedies for OU-3, OU-5 and OU 6 were expected to be protective ofhuman health and the environment upon their completion The remedy for OU 3 longterm groundwater extraction and treatment, was expected to last for several years Theexposure pathways to groundwater have been eliminated (i e connecting residences topublic water) or will be monitored throughout the OU-3 O&M phase Since the previousFive-Year Review, the remedial designs and remedial actions for OU-3 OU-5 and OU 6have been completed as required The remedy for OU-3 ground water extraction andtreatment system has been operating and maintained as designed since January 17 2005The final remedial action construction phase for OU-5 was just completed in June 2005with the vegetative cover now growing in as part of the longer-term OU-5 O&M phaseThe OU-6 building demolition and off-site debns disposal work was completed in 2004

/Confirmatory sampling/inspections for OU-3 and OU-5 will continue to be conductedaccording to approved plans to document that ROD objectives are met Specifically

• OU-3 Performance monitoring data evaluation and reporting will continue as plannedand provided for in the OU-3 Performance Evaluation Parameters (PEP) included inthe OU-3 Final (100%) Design

• OU-3 GWTS O&M sampling and inspections will continue as planned and providedfor in the OU-3 GWTS O&M Plan and OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit

• OU-5 ongoing inspections and maintenance/repairs will be conducted as planned andprovided for in the OU-5 O&M Plan

VI Five-Year Review Process

Administrative Components

The MW Manufacturing Five-Year Review team was led by Bhupi Khona of EPA RPMfor the MW Manufacturing Superfund Site, and included John Angevine, PADEP ProjectManager and EPA Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC) William Hudson

Community Involvement

An advertisement appeared on May 29 2005 in The Danville News and Press Enterpriselocal newspapers The advertisement explained the Five-Year Review process providedpoint of contact information, and identified the location of the information repositoriesfor the Site No feedback from the community was received as a result of theadvertisement

Document Review

The Five-Year Review consisted of a review of relevant documents including but notlimited to, RODs/ESDs, ARARs and the following reports prepared by O'Brien & Gere

• OU-3 Final (100%) Design, including Performance Evaluation Plan and O&M Plancomponents

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 16 of 23

Page 26: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

• OU-3 RA - Certification of Construction Phase Completion Report• OU-3 Interim Remedial Action Report• OU-5 Final (100%) Design, including O&M Plan

Data Review

This Five-Year Data Review is for OU 3 (ground water) and OU- 5 (Fluff Waste StorageTanks, Lagoon Water/Sediments and Site Soils) remedies

OU-3 Data Review

The following ground water data review summary is based on the 2004 ground watersampling and hydraulic data included in the OU-3 (Ground Water) Baseline MonitoringReport completed by O Bnen & Gere dated May 27 2005

Geological Conditions Relative to the Conceptual Site Model (CSM)

Site geological conditions were confirmed by baseline observations which furtherconfirmed that the WBZ, which consist of the lower and more permeable part of theoverburden zone, and the shallow bedrock zone are the primary aquifers associated withVOC transport The CSM was also confirmed, including the important geologic controlson ground water movement and VOC migration

Ground Water Flow Directions

Baseline ground water elevations and flow directions were consistent with previousstudies The ground water flow in the WBZ and bedrock aquifer is affected by theamsotropy and directional conductivity of the bedrock, and the data confirm thedemonstrable hydraulic connection between the WBZ and shallow bedrock The data alsoconfirm the discharge of ground water in Site aquifers to Mauses Creek

Ground water contour maps for two rounds of oveiburden ground water gauging eventsin September 2004 and December 2004 are included as Figures 4 and 5, respectivelyGround water contour maps have been included for two rounds of shallow bedrockground water gauging events in September 2004 and December 2004, as Figures 6 and 7respectively

Ground Water Discharge to Wetlands

Baseline data indicate that ground water was not discharging to the wetlands during themeasurement events As previously noted, ponded water and saturated surface soilobserved in most of the wetland areas east of the Site is likely the result of precipitationand surface runoff and not the result of a significant ground water discharge Only at theNP-3/SW-5 monitoring location and along Mauses Creek are shallow bedrock groundwater elevations higher than overburden ground water elevations

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 17 of 23

Page 27: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

VOC Concentrations in Ground Water

Concentrations of PCE, the parent VOC, and tnchloroethene (TCE) are highest in theoverburden and shallow bedrock ground water near the locations of the former processarea at the Site and a former PCE storage tank

Elevated concentrations of PCE, TCE and cis-1 2 dichloroethene (cis-1 2-DCE) extend mthe downgradient direction towards Mauses Creek PCE degradation products vinylchloride (VC), ethene and ethane are present and extend in the downgradient directionThe individual VOC plumes are centered along a primary plume axis orientedapproximately west to east

A summary of VOC concentrations in ground water samples from the 2004 baselinesampling events has been included in the attachment A Sample results for VOCconcentrations in ground water utilizing passive diffusion bags have been included onTable 2 Natural attenuation indicator parameters in ground water have been summarizedon Table 3

Evaluation of field parameter and VOC data indicated that reductive dechlonnation ofPCE and its degradation products (TCE, cis-1 2 DCE, and VC) is occurring in Siteground water at a significant rate under natural biological conditions based on themeasured redox conditions and elevated concentrations of cis-1,2-DCE, VC andethene/ethane in ground water

The estimated mass flux of VOCs to Mauses Creek based on VOC concentrations andthe estimated ground water baseflow within the plume area, is approximately 405grams/day under baseline conditions This baseline estimated VOC load to the MausesCreek will be used along with other parameters to assess the performance of the groundwater cleanup remedy

Surface Water Flow

Flow measurements in Mauses Creek collected during the baseline period indicate thatstream flow typically increases from upstream to downstream, potentially due to thedischarge of Site ground water to Mauses Creek, as predicted by the CSM Compared tostream flow, the estimated volume of flow attributable to Site ground water discharge is asmall percentage of the total stream flow A summary of Mauses Creek stream flowmeasurements collected since January 2002 has been included as Table 4

Surface Water Quality

Site-related VOCs were detected in surface water samples taken during January 2005,with total concentrations within the range previously detected in 2002 The fivespecifically-targeted metals (cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and silver) and PCB analysisrequested by the EPA's Biological Technical Assistance Group (BTAG) forevaluation/updating of the OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit were not detected in any of

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 18 of 23

Page 28: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

the stream samples, with the exception of copper in the fUrtherest downstream samples

A summary of surface water analytical results for VOCs has been included as Table 5 Asummary of surface water analytical results for SVOCs and PCBs has been included asTable 6 A summary of surface water analytical results for metals phosphorus and TSShas been included as Table 7

The surface water sample collected from the wetland area (SW-5) in September 2004contained elevated concentrations of Site-related VOCs The detected concentrationswere comparable with previous results and suggest ground water discharge at thislocation at the time of sampling However these VOCs were not detected above thereporting limit m the December 2004 sample, suggesting that ground water discharge tothis area is not continuous and/or that there is a significant flow contribution from surfacerunoff

Wetlands Delineation (off-site wetlands)

During the design, EPA Biological Technical Assistance Group (STAG) expressedconcerns about potential hydraulic effects on near by off-site wetlands due to groundwater extraction and recommended monitoring of off-site wetlands Therefore, wetlanddelineation was performed to assess the base line conditions before the start of the groundwater treatment system, the data collected would be used for the future reference Duringthe wetland transect location work in July 2004, which was attended by a representativeof the BTAG, Kathleen A Patnode, it appeared that the original (1992) wetlanddelineation may have included areas that did not exhibit wetland characteristics, such ashydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology The wetland area was re delineated Thewetland delineation was performed on September 28 and 29, 2004 to identify the extentof wetlands east of the Site, in accordance with the U S Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE) 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987) One of the wetland monitoringtransects (WT2) was also extended by an O'Bnen & Gere wetlands biologist in an areaselected by the BTAG The newly established wetlands monitoring transects anddelineation boundanes were surveyed on November 17 to 18, 2004 by a Pennsylvania-licensed surveyor (Lippincort & Jacobs Engineers, Riverside, NJ)

OU-5 Data Review

The following remedial actions have been completed for OU-5 (Fluff Waste StorageTanks, Lagoon Water/Sediments and Site Soils)

• Approximately 2,252,848 gallons of water was treated and discharged to MausesCreek under an NPDES equivalency permit issued by PADEP for the OU-5 CWTSNo violations of the NPDES equivalency permit conditions occurred during the OU-5CWTS operational period

• The excavation, stabilization and on-site placement of approximately 35,566 cubicyards of lagoon sediments and Fluff matenal

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 19 of 23

Page 29: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

• Off-site transportation and disposal of impacted materials (including approximately1,243 tons of hazardous soil/sediment containing NAPL) as an alternative to on sitelow temperature thermal disorption (LTTD) treatment

• Removal and off-site disposal of both above ground and below ground tanks anddrums, metal scrap and other miscellaneous debns encountered on the Site(approximately 18 tons of non hazardous scrap metal from the above ground andbelow ground tanks, and approximately 159 tons of non-hazardous debns)

• Removal of approximately 35,168 gallons of hazardous liquid associated with theabove ground and below ground tanks

• Removal of approximately 21,000 pounds of hazardous liquid associated with theNAPL removal activities

• Installed a soil cover system over approximately 9 acres of the Site (including placedstabilized material) The soil cover consisted of the following per the OU 5 FinalDesign

6-mchesoftopsoil18-mchesofVSL

• Ground water monitoring well abandonment and extension and ground watermonitoring well installation in conformance with the OU-3 remedy requirements

• Construction water collection, controls and management• Air monitoring (work zone and perimeter)• Fence repair/replacement• Completed wetland replacement of approximately 3,200 square feet of wetlands

vegetation disturbed during soil cover construction

The testing/performance data, as built survey drawings, waste disposal/manifest recordsand other required information for the OU-5 remedy will be included in the OU-5Certification of Construction Completion Report due in August/September 2005 Thesedata along with the OU-3 Performance Assessment data collected going forward will beaddressed with the next 5-Year Review

l

Site Inspection

On May 26, 2005, a combined 5-Year Review and OU-5 Pre-Certification Inspection washeld at the Site In attendance were Bhupi Khona (EPA RPM), John Angevme (PADEPProject Manager), G John Galasso (Nassau Metals Project Coordinator), JayMotwam/Dave Lis of Weston (OU-5 RA Contractor) and Tom Komar/Tom Nowlan ofO'Brien & Gere (Resident Engineer/Supervising Contractor) Additionally the OU-3GWTS operator, Jerry Superko of O'Brien & Gere, was also present for interviewing andquestions as needed During the inspection, the following items were covered

• A detailed tour/inspection of the OU-3 GWTS was conducted similar to the February17, 2005 OU-3 Pre-Certification Inspection Completion of the February 17, 2005OU-3 GWTS punchhst items was confirmed pursuant to the March 17, 2005Certification of Construction Completion Report All OU-3 GWTS NPDES effluent

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 20 of 23

Page 30: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

sampling data, mtra-process sampling data and GWTS operation records werereviewed and confirmed proper functioning of the treatment system as designedOther OU-3 documents requested and inspected included but were not limited to thedaily O&M inspection report O&M Manual (including OU-3 NPDES EquivalencyPermit), Site Health and Safety Plan, J Superko s operator license for Pennsylvania(although not a requirement), and Occupation Safety and Health Administration(OSHA) training records The monitoring wells were inspected and were protectedwith locks and steel guard posts as needed

• For OU-5, a detailed walkover of the Site was conducted including, but not limited tothe overall site/access controls, the completed soil cover on-site wetlandarea/plantings, fencelme/penmeter, final E&S controls drainage swales etcRelevant documentation (water disposal records stabilization results air monitoringresults, etc ) from the OU-5 remedy were reviewed, and will be included in the OU 5Certification of Construction Completion Report due in August/September 2005 withfinal as-built drawings

• The former Main Plant Building Area was also inspected to confirm the finalcompletion of the OU-6 remedy including off-site disposal of demolition debns

• On May 27, 2005, RPM Bhupi Khona and O Bnen & Gere resident engineer ThomasKomar P E visited Montour County record deed office to confirm inclusion of theCD with the current site owner of the MW Manufacturing property s deed recordThe CD was placed in the deed record as required by the CD EPA requested the deedrecorder reference the CD in the marginal notation for the property so it can be foundeasily during the title search The recorder agreed

Interviews

On May 26, 2005, a public availability session was conducted from 4pm to 6pm Alocal cable television network CCN News 8 came to the session and asked generalquestions A representative from the Susquehanna Valley Chamber of Commerce andMontour County commissioner, Mr Harold H Hurst, attended the session Most of thequestions were directed towards reuse of the Site

l

Comments in general stated that the Site was not of concern to those interviewed Keeninterest was shown for the reuse of the Site

VII Technical Assessment

Question A Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents7

Yes As explained in detail, the remedies were constructed and are now functioning asdesigned and as intended by the RODs

Question B Are the exposure assumptions, toxicitv data, cleanup levels, and RemedialAction Obiectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy still valid7

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 21 of 23

Page 31: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

The exposure assumptions used to develop the Human Health Risk Assessment includedboth current and potential future exposures These assumptions are considered to beconservative and reasonable in evaluating risk Calculating nsk based on the current RiskAssessment Guidance might make changes in nsk numbers and thus might affect nskbased cleanup levels However, the changes would have little impact on the selection ofthe appropnate remedial action already completed since the entire contaminated site soilswere either excavated and disposed off site (carbon waste pile and NAPL impacted soil)or excavated/stabilized with Fluff and placed back under a soil cover

For OU-3 the RA construction was completed and extraction/treatment system initiatedin January 2005 This remedy will be evaluated pursuant to the OU 3 FinalDesign/Performance Evaluation Plan and further assessed in the next 5 Year Reviewbased on performance data collected

The potential for the vapor intrusion pathway was evaluated and is not consideredcomplete since there is no residential housing within the Site or impacted ground waterplume area Restrictions on the future use of the property will prohibit these potentialfuture exposure pathways

ICs are in place, a local ordinance prohibits potable use of groundwater, the CD is filed atthe county record deed office and references to the CD are contained in the marginalnotation for the property

Question C Has any other information come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy9

No

VIII Issues

Issues

Potential for Vapor Intrusion (VI) pathway for Off-site Residential Housing/Other Use

AffectsCurrent

Protectiveness(Y/N)

N

Affects FutureProtectiveness

(Y/N)

Y

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 22 of 23

Page 32: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

IX Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions

Potentialfor VI

pathway forOff Site

ResidentialHousing/Other Use

Recommendations andFollow-up Actions

Implement ZoningRestrictions

PartyResponsible

ValleyTownship

/

OversightAgency

EPA

MilestoneDate

July 2006

AffectsProtectiveness

(Y/N)

Current Future

N Y

X Protectiveness Statement

The Site has been determined to be protective of human health and the environment inthe short-term because remaining direct exposure pathways have been eliminated byremedial actions under OU-3, OU-5 and OU-6 The remedy is expected to be fullyprotective of human health and the environment upon attainment of OU 3 groundwatercleanup goals, which are expected to require at least 30 years to attain In the interimexposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are being controlled and ICsare preventing exposure to, or the mgestion of, contaminated ground water Placing theCD with the current property owner s deed record will provide notice of potential nsksand descnbe what would constitute unacceptable future use of the property All threats atthe Site have been addressed through treatment and off site disposal of highlycontaminated materials including carbon waste and NAPL-impacted soils,stabilization/backfill of Fluff/sediment/soils and cover of the area

Vapor intrusion is not a current issue since there is no residential housing on-site orwithin the ground water plume area Restrictions on the future use will prevent potentialfuture exposure pathways

Long-term protectiveness of the remedial action will be verified by the OU-5 O&MPlan/Site Controls and OU-3 O&M Plan/Performance Evaluation Plan until the groundwater cleanup goals are achieved

XI Next Review

Next Five-Year Review for the Site is required by July 2010, five years from the date ofthis review

MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 23 of 23

Page 33: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

ATTACHMENT A

Page 34: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Siamr? of VOO • Gra_* WOK S^*fei

MW Muufacmruf Superfuad Sue Villey Towruaip

Analrtt

ienzeneBromodichlorornethaneBromoformBromomethane2 Buunone (MEK)Cartx>n disulfideCarbon tetrachlonde

ChlorobenzeneChi oroe thaneChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropanehbromoc hi ororoe thane

1 .2 Dibromoeihane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobeiuKWDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane

2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenec»- 1,2 Dichlotoethenetrans I 2 Dichloroetbene1,2 Dichloropropanecis-1 3 Dichloropropenetrans- 1.3 DKhlorocropeneEthylbenaneFreonll32 HexanoneIsoproDYlbenzeneMethyl AcetateMethyicycloteuncMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvi 2 DeDtanone(MIBK)Methytene chlondeSryrene1 l,2,2Tetr»chloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 ,1 ,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromeihaneVinyl chlondem,D-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethanefrW™/i/*»gfefHililliia1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran. tetrahydro-ketonesunknownTotal TICs

USiLPA UnnUfTWater MCL

or Rfak BaaedConcentration

58080

8519001000

51103680

190NA0280

0000756X10

ISO75

350800

57701005

044044

700590001500

NA61006300

26•>ooo41100

00555

10007020055

13002

NANA

10000NANA

ItaMMnfrfiSESNANANANANANANANA

Water MSC (Non-Reridcntial U*ed

Aouifer)

100005

808010

58004100

5100900803

NA0280

00560060075

100011057701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20

4105

100035

100070200

55

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANA

DCNN7

12/72/04

N 86941 3

< 2 3< 0 3 I< 0 1 I< 0 1 7<0 15<15<023< O I 5<023<073

<008I<Q 13<017< 1 1<018<047<0 19<0 18<029<062< O I 3<035<08I<024<017<0 11<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<016<028<059< 0 2

< O I 2<014<037<0 14<061<025<0 17<013<067<066<03«<017<017<00»<0075

10

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

DUNN-»

12/2004

N 867*6-6

<*6295< 2 2< 3 4< 3<50< 4 6<3 1< 4 6<15< 1 6<26< 3 5<22< 3 6< 9 3< 3 9< 3 6< S 8< 12<16< 6 997715200106

<12< 1 4< 16< 5 4<69<15<66 j<13< 3 2< 5 5<12<4 1<14<Z711700<18<12< 4 95225110< 133420< 7 3< 3 4< 3 4861485165

ND130 1NDNDNDNDND

130 J

DCVN»

0*15/04

N779H 5

< 110< 16< 5 S< 8 6< 7 4<130< U< 7 7< !<37<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<56<9<23< 9 7<9

< 14<31<65< 17<«08390

299 J< 5 4< 3 6< 4< 13< I 7<36< 17<3 l< 8 1< 14<30< 10<6

<684200< 7<30< 12502410

<3317S< 18< 8 6< 8 64 1033647

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

tX/NN«<!XJP\

0*1 VO4

NT79U 7

< 110< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 74< 130< 11< 7 7< 1<37<4 1< 6 «< 8 7<56<9<23< 9 7<9

< 14< 3 I<6-5<17<408420

«22 J< 5 4< 3 6< 4< 13< 17<3«< I 7<31<8 1< 14<30< 10<6

< 6 84110< 7<30< 12

49 •> J-380<33\76< ll<86< 8 6

•» 342025529

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

OCVN-*

IJ7MV>

N»7I64.

< 110< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4

< 130

7 7

< 1< }

i \t*&8 7

< V ><•>

< 23< 9 7< 9

< 14< 3 I< 6 5< 1 7

*«3 I9500

232 1< 5 4< 3 6< 4< 13< 17<J6< 17< 3 I<8 1< 14<30< 10< 6

< 6 85150< 7

<30< 12651• •o<33246< I 8< 8 6< 8 645404571 1

NDNDNDNDNDVD __,ND0

OCNN-ll

IJ73X)4

•O69U.I

< )< 0 3 I< 0 I I<0 17

0 U5

0 J0 15

<U 30 \

0 Ull

U 1)0 1

< 1 1< U I S< l ) 4

<0 19<0 18<0 N< 0 6 2<0 13<03J<0 t t<0^<0 17< 0 I I<0071<00t<o ~n< 0 3 5< 0 7 3< 0 3 3<0(>3<0 16<0 8<059< 0

<0 1<0 14429

<0 14< 0 6 I

0.5<0 1704« J<067<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056<0075

103

VDVDVDNDVDND0

NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not delected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not delectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region TO RBCj, April 2003 in italicsFreon 113 1 I ' tnchloro-l 2,2 mnuoroethane

Tibiel VOCal. Pigeladl

0 Bntn AC E f «**7/1 IMS

Page 35: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

T hfel"••11117 of VOO m Cnod W i

MW Mmufacmnaf Supcrfund S K V»jfcy Towiuhip

AnaJyte

Pofatfte Orpmc CompoKurfr rwt>

tenzenefromodichJorofDethanefromoform

Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobeitteneChloroethaneChlorofonnChloromethaneCyclohexane! 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneJibromochlorotne thane1 2 DibrOmoethaae1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 DichlorobenzeneI 4-Dichloroben2eneDichlonxtafluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroetheneci$ 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1,2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis- 1.3 Dichloropropenetrans 1,3-DichloropropeneEthyl benzineFreon 1132 HexanoneIsopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetatevtethyicvclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2 oentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 1 2 2 TetrachloroethaoeTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2.4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1.1,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnc hlorofl uoromethaneVinyl chloridem.D-Xyleneo-XyieneXylene (toul)EthaneEthene

TtntatiTtfrrJnetitfVIUanJrrai1 Propene 2<bromo-alcoholscvcloalkane/ilkeneDimethyl suUideFuran tetrahydro-ketonesunknown

USEPADrkk^"Wilcr MCL

or Rfck Bated__Cgoejntr»tjoa —

58080

8519001000

i1103680

190NA0280

000075600ISO

75350800

57

701005

044044700

590007500

NA61006300

262000

41100

005.J5

10007020055

13OO2

NANA

10000NANA

tjeCamoomnA^fffLiNANANANANANANANA

PA Act 2 GroundW*ier MSC (Soo-Reridnttel. Ited

Aourftr)

100005

808010

58004100

5100900803

NAo->80

00560060075

100011057

701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA204105

100035

10007020055

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

vnv i09H4VO4

V779IO-4

< 4 6<063<022<034<03< 5

<046<031<046< 1 5< O I 6<026<035< 2 2<036<093<039<036<058< 1 '<026<069< I 665715 J

<022<0 14<016<054<069<1J<066< 1 3<032<055< 1 2

<041<024<027

527<028< 1 2<049

122778<1 3<l 3<073<034<034

<OOS6<0075

022

NONDNDNDNDNDND0

vw iI2/3V04NS6746-2

< 5 7<079<028< 0 4 3<037< 6 3<057<039<05«<l 8< 0 " ><033< 0 4 3< 2 8

<045< 1 2<04*<045<072< 1 5<033<086

<•>S46

<042<027< O I I< 0 2<067<or?< 1 8<083< 1 6< 0 4<069< 1 5<051<03<034476

<035<1J<062104644< 1 7<l 7<091<043<043<0056<0075

353

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

Wl

09/1404

ff779IO^

<23<J 1< 1 1< 1 7< 1 5< J< 2 3< 1 5<13< 7 3< 0 8 I< 1 3< 1 7< I I<l 1< 4 7< 1 9< It<2.9< 6 2< I J< 3 J116306

72 J<l 1<071<os<2.7<3J<7J< 3 3<63< I 6<1S< 5 9< 2

< 1 2< 142000< 1 4< 6 1< 2 531 7577

< 6 713

< 3 6<1 7<l 7

<00560371 5

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

VTW 1

1_OO04

NJ7405-I

233 1I 1I 71 5J•> 31 5-.37 3

O i li 31 7

1 84 71 9

< I 8< 2 9< 6 2< 13< 3 5<8 1•>ll

64 J< 1 1<071< O I<2.7<3J< 7 3<3J<6J< 1 6<Z8< 5 9< 2

< 1 2< 1 41130< 1 4<6 1< 2 5

18446

< 6 7<66< 3 6< 1 7< 1 7

<0056<0075<0066

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

vw j0*1*04

NT79IO-5

<570< 7 »

<ll<4 1<3 7<*30<57<39<i J

< I I O<-0<3 i<J 1<JO< 4 5

< I 2 0<4I

<45< 7 2

< I 5 0<33<86<200

120603<2.7<l 8<20<67<J7

< I I O<S3<I60<40<69< I 5 0<31<30<344530<35<I50<6281 6925

<170262<91<43<43

123918 1

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

SfW J

I--3XX

NM74A-I

n o6}

<055<OI6<074

U O1 1

<o •"1

O< U 4 I<U«>6<OS<st><U»<- 3

<097<09<l 4

<J 1<£&5< | 7142).W203

<£M<036<04<IJ<l 7<36<i ^<3 1

< O I I<l 4<30< 1 0<06<0687160<07<30<l 2144

148003627<18<086<086

23639353

NDVDVDVDIDVDVD0

NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not delected substantially above level in field blanks1C result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region ffl RBCs Apnl 2003 in italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-1 2 "> tnfluoroethane

Table 1 VOCali Fife 2 of 11OBnt AC E linerrt Inc

7/1 iai

Page 36: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

T hbta GTOT* W Mr " — ,,1,

MW Minu/jcmnnj Stiperfuad Sin

Aaalyte

tenzenciroraodichlorome thaneJromoformBromome thane•> BUUDOIK (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon temchlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChlorometnaneCycloheune1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneTibromochlorometnane1,2 Dibromoe thane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobeiueoeDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane

1 1 Dichloroethenecis- 1.2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroetnene] 2 Dichloropropanecis-1 3 Dichloropropenetram 1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneFreoollB2 HexanooebopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetatevlethylcyclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 centanonefMTBK)Methylene chlondeStyrene1 1,2.2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2 4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1.1.2 TnchloroetnaneTnchloroetheneTnchloron oromethaneVinyl chlondem.o-Xvleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneT«aa«n»rf 14-tfrfjffffaffSSfc1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran tetrahydro-ketooesunknownTotal TICs

UitPA IWnkETWater MCL

orRhkBoedConetntnttoo

58080

as19001000

51103680

190NA0280

000075600

ISO75

350800

7701005

044044700

590007500

NA61006300

26200041100

00535

10007020055

13002

NANA

10000NANA

A^5ih«*<roMNANANAHANANANANA

Water MSC (Noo-RokteDtial. Und

Aouifer)

100005

808010

38004100

5100900803.

NA0280

00560060075

1000110

770100

5NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20

4105

100035

100070200

55

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

MW-4

0*14/04

N779IO-3

<063<022<034< 0 3<5

<046< 0 3 I<046< 1 5

<0 16<026<035< 2 2<036<093<039<036<058<! 2

<026

< 1 611 1

1 3 1<022<0 14< O I 6<054<069< I J<066< 13<032<055< I 2<041<024<027921

<02g< 1 2

<049193103

< 1 3< 1 3<073.<034<034<0056<0075<0066

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

NfW-4

12^2004

NU746-I

< 11< 1 6

<0_55<086<074<13< 1 1

<OT7< 12< 3 7

< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6<09< 2 3<097< 0 9< I 4<3 1<065

<41X4

<084<054<OJ6<04< 1 3< 1 7< 3 6< I 7<3 1<081< I 4<3< 1

< 0 6<068773< 0 7<3

< 12159891<33< 3 3< I 8

< O K<086

<OQS6<0075<00«6

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

MW 5

09rl4A4

NT7910-I

< II< 16<055< O M<074< 1 3< 1 1<077< 1< 3 7

< 0 4 I<066< o n< 5 6< 0 9<2J<orr< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<063

< 422

<084<054<OJ«<04<l 3< I 7< 3 6<n< 3 1<081< 1 4<3< l

<06<0682890< 0 7<3

<1 2454172

< 3 3< 3 3<1 8<08«<0&6

<OQ5« J<OO75 «<0066

NDNDSDNDNDNDND0

MW5

lim>O4

NS«74«.5

< 11< 1 6<035<086<0 74< 13< 1 1

< O T 7< 1<3 7

< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6<0»< 2 3<on< 0 9< 1 4<3 1

<065

< 490117 J<054<OJ«<04< I 3< 1 7< 3 6<l 7<3 1

< O I 1< 1 4< 3< 1

< 0 6<0683150< 0 7< 3

< 12484193

< 3 3< 3 3< 18<:086<OS6<0056<0075<0066

NDNDVDNDNDNDNDo

MW-*

0*1 */O*

N7T9IO-

13< 0 3 I< 0 I I

0 17< 0 I J<15<0 J<0 15<0_!010011

<0 13<0 17< 1 1

< 0 1 >«047<0 19< a u<0 ^9<06' )

< 0 1 3

< O I II I 9

<0 17<0 11<007I<OOS<027<OJ5<073<033<0i3<0 16<028<OJ9< 0 2<0 12<0 14

221<0 14< 0 6 l<025<0 17459

<067< O M<036<0 17<0 17<0056<0075

115

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

MW-4

IJ^QfTM

*a«746O

< u< 3 1< 1 1< 1 7< 1 5< J

1

< 1 *< 3< 1

O i l< 1 '

1 7I I

< 1 1< 4< 1 <>

< 1 1

<^9< 6 2< IJ

<8 137

62 J< 1 1

< 0 7 1< O I<2.7< 3 5< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6< 28< 5 9< 2

< 1 2< 1 41270< 1 4<6 I< 2 5< 1 7275

< 6 7< 6 6< 3 6< 1 7< 1 7

<005«<0075

374

VDVDVDVDVDVDND0

NottlJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB noc detected substantially above level in field blanks1C result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region ffl RBO, April 2003 in italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-l 12 tnfluoroethane

Tiblel VOC»li Pije 3 of 11OBnr AC Engine n IHC

/IMS

Page 37: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

T.M.Iof VOO Im Growl W Mr

MW Muuficmniif Superfund SJK Vilky Tovutip

Anaiytt

Valaalt Orgame CompomnJt (pg/1)

lenzeneIromodichlorome thaneiroraoform

Bromome thane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzenerhloroethane-hJoroformIhiororaethane

Cyclohexane2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane

Dibromochloromethane1,2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene

3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-Dichlorobenzene>ichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane

1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecis 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene

2 Dichloropropanecis 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzrneireon 1 132 HexanoneIsoprooYlbenzeneMethyl AcetatevlethylcyclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlondeStyrene. 1 2 2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2 4-Tnchlorooenzene[ 1 1 Tnchloroethane1,1.2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetbeneTnchlorofluoroinethaneVinyl chlondem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneVie thane

1 Propene 2 bromo-alconolscycloalkane/alkcnc[Xmethyl sulfideftiran. tetrahydro-ketonesunknownTotal T1C5

CSEPADHnESTW»t»rMCL

orRiikBaMdConcratnttoa

58080

8519001000

51103680

190NA0280

000075600

ISO75

350800

57701005

044044700

59000J500

NA61006300

26100041100

005J5

100070200

55

1300•2

NANA

10000NANA

NANANANANANANANA

PAActlC™33~Witcr MSC (Non-Reridndal Uftd

Awifcr)

5808010

38004100

5100900803

NA '0280

00560060075

1000no57701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20410

5100035

10007020055

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

VTW7

I2T9KJ4

N87352 5

<2391 3< 1 1<l 7< 1 5<25< 2 3<1 5< / ) 3< 7 3< 0 8 I< 1 3< 1 7< 11< 1 8< 4 7<1 9< 1 8< 2 9< 6 2< 13< 3 55015320664< 1 1

<071<08< 2 7< 3 5< 7 3< 3 3<63< 1 6<I8< 5 9< 2

< I 2< 14998

59 J< 6 1< 2 5174

1920< 6 71540< 3 6<1 7< 1 7166129

1460

ND430 J

NDNDNDND

110J540 J

VfW-i

I2/2*O4

N^352 3

<57I9S I< 8<4 3< 3 7<63< 5 7< 3 9< 5 8< 18< 2

< 3 3< 4 3<Z8< 4 5< 1 2< 4 8< 4 5< 7 2< 15< 3 3< 8 6459

17400221

< 2 7< 1 8< 2

< 6 7< 8 7<18<83< 16<4

<69<15<5 1<3

< 3 4457017 ;< 15< 6 2241

•>760< 178630< 9 1< 4 3< 4 39751620266

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

VfW-»(DtO?1

1J *0«

N87352-*

<57IS ]<18< 4 3< 3 7<63< 5 7<3 9< 5 8< 18< 2

<3 3<4 3< J< 4 5

< 12< 4 8< 4 5< 7 2< 15< 3 3< 8 6449

16800135

<17< U< 2

< 6 7< 8 7<18< 8 3< I 6< 4

<69<15<5 1<3

< 3 44270158 J< 15< 6 2230600

< 178260< 9 I< 4 3< 4 38231700 .•>49

VDNDVDNDNDNDNDo

trw *I.TSKM

M7352 2

< 110< 16< 5 5< S 6

7 4< IX)< 11

7 7< 1<}7<4 1< 6 6< « 7<»< 9<23< 9 7< 9

< 14< 3 I< 6 5< 17<40657< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4

< 1 3< |7<>6< 17<31<8 1< 14<30< 10<6

<6827800

< 7<30< 12181

1320<33<33< 18< 8 6< 8 6

0 1 2 B047

089B

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

\O» U

IJ-SK*

NTH52 7

603 I1.61•cO 11<0 17<0 15< _ s<0-3<0 15

0-3<0 3< 0 0 « l< 0 1 3<0 17< 1 1

<0 IS< 0 4 7<0 19< 0 1 S<029< 0 6 2

1 9J<03549919«IO47 8 J< 0 1 1<0071<on033 J<OJ5955J<033<063<0 16<02S9 9 )< 0 2

<0 12< 0 1 43 3 137 J

< 0 6 I<025<0 17085 J<06723400086 1035 J

1 2J1470419014600

8331ND

95 JN79 W

18 I138 J

8822 J

VO* 13

I-T*0«

•O7I64-I

)<0 51< 0 I I

0 10 M

< 5<0 J

0 150 J0 \) Ml0 1 '1 I

1 1j \ tf ) 4

0 H<0 I I<0 'N< 0 6 2< 0 I J< 0 3 S< O S I

>l< 0 1 7< 0 I I<007)<0«<027<OJ5<0 3< 0 3 3< 0 6 3<0 16<0-J<059< 0 2

<0 1<0 14069 I<0 14<061<025<0 17

1 6<067<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056

0075<0066

NDNDNDSDSDND0

NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in Held blanks1C result is biased nighND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exuts)

USEPA Region ffl RBCs April 2003 in italicsFreonlB 1 1 2 tnchloro-l 22 tnfluoroethane

Tiblel VOC-xli Pi«e4ofO Bntn AC E gate rt fnc

Page 38: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Tabfc IrfVOOoiGn«dW Mr

MW Mwihcmniil Super-fund S tc Villey Towubip

Analyte

lenzeneIromodichloromethane

BromoformBromomethane2 Buumone IMEK)Carbon disulfideCarton tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroe thaneChloroform

Chlorome thaneCyclone xane

2 Dibromo-3-chioropropanehbromochloromethane

1 ,2 Dibromoethane1 2 DichlorobenzeneJ Dichlorobenzene4-Dichlorobenzene

Jichlorodifluoroinethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecis l/> Dichloroeihenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1,3 DicnloroeropeneEthylbenzeneTeonll32 tiexanonejopropylbenzenevlethyt AcetatertethylcyclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oenUnone(MTBK)Methyleoe chlondeStyrene1 1 2,2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene

1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 \ ,2 TnchloroethaneTn hloroetheneTnchlorofluorornethaneVinyl chlondem,p-Xvieneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEthene

Ttrtatmb IdtMMVolatJt OtW1 Propene 2 bromc-alcoholjcycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl uilfideFuran tetrahydro-

unknownTotal TICs

USJKPA IMnUHTWater MCL

or Riik Baaed

58080

8S19001000

51103680

790VA02SO

000075600ISO75

350800

57701005

044044700

590001500

NA61006300

26200041100

00535

100070

20055

13002

NANA

10000NANA

NANANANANANANA

Water MSC (NeoRcddendaJ, U«d

Aouifer)

580SO10

58004100

5100900SO3

NA02SO

00560060075

100011057701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20

4105

100035

100070200

55

20002

NANA

10000NANA

W~^NANANANANANANANA

MW 15

09/iftAH

N78002-»

< 7 9< 2 S< 4 3< 3 7<63< 5 7< 3 9< 5 8< 18< • >

< 3 3< 4 3<->8< 4 5< 12< 4 8< 4 5< 7 2< 1 5< 3 3<:86<20J55

<:42<17< I 8< 2

< 6 7< 8 7<18< 8 3<16<4

< 6 9<15<5 1< 3

< 3 410400< 3 5<15< 6 2J3\1700<17269< 9 1< 4 3< 4 3028144 1

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

V1W IS

12HSAX

N87164-3

< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4<130< 11< 7 7< 12<37<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<56< 9

<23< 9 7<9

< 14< 3 I< 6 5<17<40699< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4< I 3< I 7<36< 17<31< 8 1< 14<30<10<6

<687160< 7<30< \ 2<S31120<33<.33< 18< 8 6< 8 6O ^ B

1 483

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

MW isiwnIJ7SXM

VTI64-1

< 110<16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4< 130< 11< 7 7< 1< 3 7<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<56<9

<23< 9 7<9

< 14< 3 I< 6 5<17<406*5< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4

< 13<17<36< 17< 3 I<8 1< 14<30< 10<6

< 6 86330< 7<30< 12<83978<33<33<18<86< 8 6

026B1 486

NDNDNDNDNDND0

MW It

IJ7I/O*

NUU6-7

<2.3< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15< _ 5

<023<0 15< 0 _ )< 0 7 3<008I<0 13< 0 1 7< 1 1

< O I 8< 0 4 7<0 19<0 IS<029<062< O I 3<035< 0 8 I<024<0 17< 0 I I<0071<00><027<OJ5<on<033<063<016<02S<0.59< 0 2

<0 12<0 14091 K<0 14< 0 6 I<025< 0 \ 7<0 13<067<066<03«<017<0 17

$0056<00750348

NDNDNDNDNDND0

MW 17

1./21JO*

VS6U6-9

3< 0 3 I< 0 I I<0 17<0 15

5<0 J<0 15

0_>< 0 7 3< n o 8 i<0 13<0 17< 1 1

<0 II< 0 4 7<0 19< O I 8<029<062<0 13< 0 3 5< 0 8 I<0 4<0 17< 0 I I<0071<00t<027<OJ5<071<033<063<0 16<02S<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14<037<0 14< 0 6 I<025< o n<0 13<067<066<036<an<0 17<0056<0075or!B

NDNDNDNDNDSD0

vrw it1.TI/W

NMI36-2

< 3<0 31<0 1 1<0 17<0 15< 50 J

< ) 15U _30 1

IM«I0 130 1

< 1 1<0 18<017<0 19<0 11<029<062<0 13<OJ5< 0 8 I

1 2<0 17<0 11<0071< O M<027<035<073<:033<:063•cO 16<02I•cO 59< 0 2

<0 12<0 14

9<0 14< 0 6 I<025<o n071 J< 0 6 7<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056<0075

404

VDNDNDNDNDSD0

NOW If

I_~I/O»

MMV«-l

1

0 ) 1< 0 I I

0 17o n

50 30 1'0 1) 1

1 WlU 1) 1I

U II0 4 70 19

<0 I I029

< 0 6 2< 0 1 3<035< O I I<0 4<0 17< 0 I I<007I< O M< o n< 0 3 5

073< 0 3 3<063

0 16<0 1< 0 5 9

0<0 1<0 14055 I<0 14< 0 6 1<0 J

on0 13

<067<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056<00750 13 B

SDSDSDSDNDSD0

NotesI estimated alue (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compound

B not delected substantially above level in field blanks

K result is biased high

ND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

US EPA Region ffl RBCs. April 2003 in italicsfreon 113 112 tnchloro-l 2.2 mfluoroethane

Tiblel VOCxli Pace S of 11

Page 39: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

T.h*,l

VfW Maaufactunflt Superfuod S»* V*Jky T wnstup PA

Aiwlytc

ienzenesrornodichloromethaneBroraoformBromome thane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChi oroe thane"hlcToformChi orome thaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneDlbromochJ orome thane1,2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroetheiwcii- 1.2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis-1 3-DicUoropropenetram 1,3 DichlcroprooeneEthylbenzeneFreonIB2 Hexanone[soDropylbenzeneMethyl AcetateMethylcvclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2 Denb>none(\fTRK)Metbylene chlondeStyrene1 12,2 TetrachloroethaneTetnchloroetheoeToluene1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 . 1 ,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlondem.D-XYteneo-XyleneXylene (local)EthaneEtheneMethaneTtaUMh I4-"f^ v«^«fnr1 Propene 2 brocno-alcoholsCYcloalk>"^»lt««gChmethyl sulfideftiran. tetrahydro-

unknownTotamCs

TSBTBRaSi-Wiier MCL

orftfakBaedCooc.ntr.Uoo*

58080

as19001000

51103680

790NA0280

000075600

ISO75

3SO800

57701005

044044700

59000J500

NA5/00«00

26'00041100

00535

100070200

55

13002

NANA.

10000NANA

y<^m»«ml*(at/LNANANANANANANANA

Waur MSC (MooResidential, U«rd

Awufer)

5808010

58004100

5100900803 '

NA0280

OOi60060075

1000no57

701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA204105

100035

10007020055

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

(«*>NANANANANANANANA

MW 20

I2/22W

N86941-4

< 0 3 I< 0 1 1<0 17<0 15< - > 5<023<015<023<073<008I< O I 3<0 17< 1 1< 0 i »<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035

1 720636

< 0 I I<0071<008<027<OJ5<073<033<063<01«<028<059< 0 2

<0 12<014J67

< O I 4<061<02J085 i283

<0671 1

<036<017<0 170 1 8 B<0075

1 9

MW 12

09/I5AM

N77911 2

< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4<I30< 11<n< 12<37<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<5«<»

<23< 9 7<9

< 14< 3 1< 6 5<17<406240150

< 5 4<36< 4< 1 3<17<36< 17<31<8 1< 14<30<10<6

< 6 8248<7<30< 12< 8 31640<33

47 1 J< 1 &<*6<«604303395

MWU

I_T>7*>4

Wi l l 5

< no< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4<130< I I< 7 7< P< 3 7<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<5«< »

<23<17<9

< 14< 3 1< 6 5<17<405780862< 5 4<36< 4

< 13<|7<J6< 17< 3 I<8 1< 14<30<10<6

< 6 8221< 7<30< 1 2< 8 31410<33<33<1»<8«< 8 6

045B051

14

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

MW 25*n/a»4N7JI56-1

< 11< 16<055<OS6< 0 7 4< 13< 1 1<OTT< 1< 3 7

< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6c09< 5<097

< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<065< 1 7<435316 1<054<03«< 0 4< I 3< 1 7< 3 6<l 7<3 1

< 0 » 1< 1 4< 3< 1

< 0 6<0682270< 0 7< 3

< 1 2353229

< 3 3< J 1<H

<OM<086<K056<*075<0066

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

MW IS

I./77/04

N«71U )

<4e< 6 3<

3 43

< 50< 46< 1 \< 46

15< 1 6

6< 35<: - -< 36<« 1

59< 3 6< 5 8< 12< _ 6< 6 9< 1664

< 3 4< 2< 1 4< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9< \ 5< 6 6< 1 3< 3 2< 5 5< I 2<4 1< 1 4< 73460< 1 8< 12< 4 931 6m< 13< 13< 7 3< J4< 3 4

<005«<0075<0066

SDNDNDVDSONDND0

MW U

OWI7/04

N7J156.

< )< 0 3 I<0 11

0 1<0 15< 5<0 J

o \ s0 _30 )

O O R I

< 0 1 10 1

1 1

0 IS0 4 7

<0 19<0 It<029<062< O I 3<035< O S I413

< O I 7< O I I<007I<OOS<o-n<035< 0 7 3< 0 3 3<063<0 16<02J<059< 0 2

<0 12<0 14

117<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17

»1<067<066

<036<0 17<0 170 11

<00754 3

NDVDNDNDSONDND0

MW 2*

iy wst m

\< 0 J l< 0 I I

0 170 15

50 3> !•.U _ l0 1I MlU 1 10 1

1 1

0 II0 40 11

<0 II<o >»< 0 6<0 13< 0 3 5< O I I6*9

< O I 7< 0 I I<ao7i<oo»< o ^< O J 5<0 )< 0 J J< 0 6 3<0 16<0 J< 0 5 9< 0

<0 P<0 142 4 2

<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17

155< 0 6 7

<066< 0 3 6<0 17<0 17<0056<0075

578

VDVDVDVDVDVDVD0

NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region m RBCs, April 2003 m italicsFreon 113 II1 fnchloro-l 2.2 tnfluoroethane

Table! VOCxU Pjjt6oill0 Brtf AC E gutter Inc

Page 40: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

T Mil

MW MuufKtunni Superfuad S K V«]k T wnibip PA

Analytc

ienzeneIromodichlororoethaneiromoform

Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroe thaneChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneDibromochloromethane1,2 Dibromoethaoe1 2 Dichlorobenzene

3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethaoe1 2 Dichloroethane

I Dichloroethenecis 1.2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis- 1.3 Dichloropropenetraos-1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbcnzeneFreoo 1132 HexanoneIsonroovlbenzeneMethyl Acetatevfethylcyclobexane

Methyl tert Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanone(MIBK)vlethylene chlonde

Styrene1 1 2.2 TetrachloroethsneTetrachJoroetbeneTolueneI 2 4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethaoe1 . 1 .2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTn hlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlondem.t>-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneTVirtttTMff IdatifM VfbaSU^ffpa-1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholicycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran tetrahydro-ketooesunknownTotal TICs

UMiPA Drink^-WaterMCL

orRfckBuedConcentradoo

58080

8519001000

51103680

190NA0280

000075600

ISO75

3SO300

57701005

044044700

590007500

NA61006300

26200041100

005J5

10007020055

13002

NANA

10000NANA

OfflmrrumtrtiftBNANANANANANANANA

PA Act 1 GroundWater MSC (Noo-lUridenttal, U«ed

Amiftr)

5808010

58004100

5100900803 '

NA0280

00560060075

100011057701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20

4105

100035

100070200

55

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

NfW »

I2/23AJ4

N86988-3

<13< 0 3 l<0 11«0 17<0 15<15<023<0 15<023<073

<OOSI< 0 1 3<0 17< 1 1< 0 1 8<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035< 0 8 I<024< 0 1 7< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<016<028<059<02

<0 12< 0 1 4<037<0 14<061<02J<0 17<0 13<0 67<066<03«< O I 7<017026B<0075

756

NDNDNDNDNDND15 J15 J

MW JO

0*17/04

V78 156-3

< 1 6<055<086< 0 7 4<13<1 1

<077<1 •>< 3 7

< 0 4 l<066<087< 5 6< 0 9< 2 3

<097< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<065<l 7< 4no68

<054<036< 0 4< I 3< I 7< 3 6< 1 7<3 1

<081< 1 4<3< 1

< 0 6<0682060<07<3

< 1 2174347

< 3 3< 3 3<l 8

<086<086<005«<0075

015

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

MW3«

I2/TV04

NI69U-2

<23<3 1< 1 1< 1 7< 1 5<_5< 3< 1 5< 3< 7 3< 0 g l< I 3< 1 7< 1 1< 1 8<4 7< I 9< 1 8< 2 9< 6 2< U< 3 5<*.!175

8 1 J< 1 1<071< 0 8< 2 7< 3 5< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6< ^ 8< 5 9< 2

<1 2<1 41730< 1 4<6 1< 2 5119285< 6 7< 6 6< 3 6< 1 7<l 7

<0056<0075

1 5B

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

0«-J

I2/-*VO«

N8TJ5 -6

< 110< 1*< 5 5< 8 6<•> 4< 130< 1 1< 7 7< 1< 3 7<» \< 6 6f

<56< 9<23< 9 7< 9

< 14< 3 1< 6 5< 17<406«9< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4

< I 3< I 7<36<17<31<8 1< 14<30< \ 0<6

< 6 827300

< 7<30< 12242

20400<33<33< 18< 8 6<86

<0fi56OSl183

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

OS-5

9VI6O4V7J002 10

<2J<] 1< 1 1< i ^< \ 5<-5< 3< 1 5< 3< 7 3< 0 * \< 3< 7

< I< 7< 9< S< 9< 6< 1 3< 3 5<l 1470I I 6

< 1 1< 0 7 1< 0 »<17<3J< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3<1 6< 2 8< 5 9<1

< 1 •>< 1 41270< 1 4<6 1< 2 5266384< 6 7103

< 3 6< 1 7<l 7232

0094 J22 1

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

Oft-S

IV2MX

NTMfrM

*6< 4 3< fc

< ) ')

< V)< 46

3 1< *6

15I 6

< 61 5

< 3 6< 9 3< 3 9< 3 6< ) l< 12<»6<6.9< 16674< 3 4<1J< 14< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9< I 5< 6 6< 13< 3 2< 5 5< 1 2<4 1< 2 4<2.72410< 2 8< P< 4 988

626< 13< 13< 7 3< 3 4< 344 7 1

<0075347

NDVDVDNDNDVDND0

Oft- 1*

\J^~Vt

< Z3< J 1< 1 1< 1< 1 5< J

»3< J

_ )i

O i l3

1

t1

196 21333

97 JBJ< I 7< 1 1<&7I<ai<17< 3 5< 7 3< 33< 6 3< I 6

1< 5 9< J

< 1 2< 1 41700< 1 4<6 1<2JM 7946< 6 7ni< 3 6< 1 7< 17

0 168<OCT75

545

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

NoieaJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region 01 RBCs, AprU 2003 m italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-1 2.2 tnfluoroethane

Tiblel VOCjili Pi«e 7 of 110 Bngn A C £n| Merr /nc

Page 41: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

MW Minuficmruii Sopofuod S « ViUey To»Mtti(i PA

Analyt*

ienxeneJrornodichlorotnethaneIromofonn

Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobeozeneChloroe thaneChJorofonnChlorornetha'ieCyclohexane

2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane)ibromochloromethane1 2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dvchlorobeniene1 4-Dichlocobenzene)ichlorodif1uoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichlocoethane1 1 Dichloroethenecii-1.2 Dichloroetbenetram 1 2 Dichloroetnene1 2 Dichloropropanecu 1 3 Dichloropropeoetran5 1.3 DichloropmueneEthylbenzeneFreonlU2 HeunoneIsooropylbenzenevlethyi AcetatevlethylcvclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 pentanooe(MIBK)vlethylene chlondeStyrene1 1 2,2 TetrachloroethaneTcQ^hloroeiheneToluene1 .2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1.1.'' TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlondem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethane

1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscvcloalkane/alkeoeDimethyl sulfideFunn tetrahydro-kelooesunknownToulTlCs

ISKPA DrinkerWater MCL

or Risk BatedConcentndon

53030

8519001000

51103680

190NA0 2SO

000075600180

75350800

57701005

044044700

590001500

NA61006300

26200041100

00535

100070200

55

1)002

NANA

10000NANA

afVtmtlu*4(rt/UNANANANANANANANA

PA Act ! GnST~Wiur MSC (Noo-KtstdetHtal, Uicd

Aquifer)

5808010

58004100

5100900803

NA0280

00560060075

1000no57701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20

4105

100035

10007020055

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

v=:

NANANANANANANANA

OB- 1309/16/04

V78002 1

< 11< 1 6<055<086<074<13< 1 1<077< 1 2< 3 7< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6<09< 2 3

<097<09< 1 4<3 1<065< 1 7< 4462

<084<054<036< 0 4<13< 1 7< 3 6<1 7< 3 1

<081< 1 4<3< 1

< 0 6<068

701< 0 7<3

< 1 2<083

127< 3 3< 3 3< 1 8<086<086<0056<0075

022

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

OB-IJ

IJ71/O4

N86»3«-4

< 0 3 I< O I 1<0 17< 0 1 5<2.5

<023<0 15<023<073<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1<018<047< O I 9< 0 1 8<029<062<013<035< 0 8 I202

<0 17< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<02S<059< 0 2

< O I 2<014

345<0 14<061<02J06 J647

<067<066<036<017<0 17<0056<0075036B

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

OB-14

09/15*H

VT7911 3

<46

< 6 3< _ • >< 34<3<50< 4 6<3 1< 4 6< 15< 1 6< 6< 3 5<2.< 3 6< 9 3< 39< 3 6< 5 8< 12<2.6< 6 9< 162610356<2.2< 1 4< 1 6<:54<69< 15< 6 6< 1 3< 3 2< 5 5< 12<4 1< 2 4< 2 72130< 2 8< P< 4 929310«0< 13< 13< 7 3< 3 4< 3 406S

<007567

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

OB-14

IJT2AX

VM94I 5

<46< 6 3< ^< 34< 3<50< 4 6<3 1< 4 6< 15< 1 6< 6< 3 5< 2< > 6<93< j»< 3 6< 5 8< 12<16< 6 9

213740264<2.2< 1 4< 16< 5 4< 6 9< 1 5< 6 6< 13< 3 2< 5 5< I 2< 4 l<2.4<-73550< 2 8< 12< 4 94381640< 13<13<7J< 3 4< 3 4

0*7B< 0*075

45

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

re-irr09/16AM

fiani

< 110'i j< 5 5< 8 6

7 4< 130< 1 1< 7 7< 1< }7

4 166

< S 756

< 9< -J< 9 7

<9< 14< 3 I< 6 5< 179382660

215 J< 5 4< 3 6<4< 13< I 7<36< 17<31<8 1< 14<30< 10<6

< 6 87630< 7<30< 12130

3030< 3 3228<18< S 6< 8 6

1 422 1190

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

rz-irrIJT&O*

MT? 144-6

< ¥ >< 6 3< fc

< )*< )<50< 46< 3 1

4 61<

1 66

» 5

< ! 69 j

< 3 9< 3 6< 5 8< 12<16<694111100< 3 4<2J< 1 4< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9< 15< 6 6< 13< 3 2< 5 S< 12<4 1< 4<173460< 2 8< 12< 4 94961580

137«9< 7 3< 3 4< 3 417817157

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

rT-iTT

1J7MM

< 11< 1 6

< 0 5 50160 74n

1 10 "7

t)

0 4 10601*< 6

< U »1

on< 0 9

< 1 4

<1 1

<065< I 1< 4JJ»14

<054<03o< 0 4< 13< 1 7< J6< 1 7

< ) 1O i l

1 4< 3< 1

< 0 6<06«964< 0 7< 3

< 1 295582

< 3 314 1< 1 >

<086<08e0 13B044

B

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

Notev] estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result a biased highND not delectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Rcpoo ffl RBCi, Apnl 2003 m italicsFreonll3 1 1 2 mchloro-1 2,2 mnuoroethane

Tibkl VOCjili Page 8 of 11

OBntm AC E gtnt tnc7/IJA)}

Page 42: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

TafcfclSa^^y of VOO - Oo—d W — ' ^u

MW Muuiicniniif Supofuod S K Vjjic T wtuiup PA

AnaljrU

ienzeneiromodichlorome thaneBromofonnBromomethane2 Butanone (M£K)Carbon cbsulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromelhaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneDibromoc hi orome thane1 2 Dibromoethane1 2 DtchJorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethanet 1 Dichloroethenecu 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1,3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneFreonll32 HexanoneIsopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetateMethylcyclobexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (VTTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanondMIBK)Vfethylene chlorideStyrene1 1 2,2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 ,2.4-TnchlorobenzBne1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 . 1 .2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheaeTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chloridera.D-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethane

1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscvcloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideRiran tetrahydro-ketonesunknownToulTICs

"csBTroaa rWater MO.

orRiikBMtdCoocentr«tfcKi

580SO

8519001000

51103680

190NA0280

000075600

ISO75

J50SOO

57701005

044044700

59000V500

NA61006300

26200041100

005.75

100070200

55

13002

NANA

10000NANA

NANANANANANANANA

Water MSC (Noa-Heridenttal, Used

Aouifer)

100005

808010

58004100

5100900803

NA •0280

00560060075

1000no57

701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20410

510003

5100070200

55

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

PZ-3IT

I-/79/O4

N8735-> 1

<23<3 1< 1 1< U< 1 5<25< 2 3< 1 5< 2 3< 7 3< 0 8 I< 1 3< 1 7< I I< 1 8

471 91 829621 3

< 3 5<8 1115

53 J< 1 1<071< 0 8<17<35< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6<28< 5 9< 2

< 1 2< 144160< 1 4< 6 1< 2 5358467

< 6 7< 6 6< 3 «< 1 7< 1 7

<0056<0075

1 3B

NDNDNDVDNDNDND0

PZ-W1

OWISO4

VT79II-6

< ^ 3< 0 3 I< 0 I I<0 17<0 15< 2 5<023<0 15<023<073

<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1

< 0 1 8<047<0 19<0 18<029<062< O I 3<035< 0 8 I

21<0 17<0 11<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<016<028<059<02< 0 1 2<014266

< O I 4<061<023< O I 7

132<067<066<036< 0 1 7<0 17<005«<0075

04

NDNDNDNDNDND0

PZ-W1

1./2JO4

V 86941

< 2 3< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15<2.5<023<0 15<0-3< 0 7 3

<008I< O I 3<0 17< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029< 0 6 2<0 13<035< O S I

18,5<017<0 11<0071<00»<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<018<059< 0 2

< O I 2<0 14

263<0 14< 0 6 I<025< 0 1 7

136<067<066<036< 0 1 7<0 17<0056<00750 5 B

NDNDNDNDNDND0

PZ-W2

09/IVO4

VT791I 1

< 1 1J

<055<OI6< 0 7 4< 13< 1 1<077< 1< 3 7< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6< 0 9< 2 3

<097< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<065< 1 768

197012

<054<03«< 0 4< 1J<1 7< 3 6< 1 7<3 1< 0 8 I< 1 t<3< 1

< 0 6<068654< 0 7<3

< 1 2109487

< 3 354

< 1 8<086<08«0780136"l

NDNDNDNDNDND0

fZ-W2

1172AX

VM44I-6

J<3 1< 1 1< 1 1< 1 5< J< 3< 1 5< 3< 3< O I I< 1 3< 1

< 1 S< 4

< t 9< 1 8< 2 9< 6< 1 3< 3 5<l 11330< 1 7< 1 1< 0 7 I< 0 8<2.7<3J< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6<18< 5 9< 2

< 1 2< 1 4418

< 1 4<6 1< 2 50 7337

< 6 7<66< 3 6<1 7< 1 7

075B025139

NDNDNDNDNDND0

• W 35I.T1/O4

•06*36-5

<13< 0 3 I

0 I Ion

<0 15< 5

0 J0 15l) -30 71

1)0*1

<u n0 1

< i i< o i s< 0 4 7<U 19< O I I<029< 0 6 2<0 13< 0 3 3< 0 8 I<0 14<017<0 I t<007l< O M<027<OJ5<073< 0 3 3<063<0 16<02S<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14< 0 3 7<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17<0 13<067<066<03«<0 17<0 17<0056<00750 5 3 B

NDNDNDNDNDND0

sat-4\J~~l/Ot

M I M - 6

57< 4

< 14 )

< )7

<&35!•»< 1I I

t t4 1

J

4 5

1

«*

t i

7< 15< U< I 6<20113

< 4 2<17< l l< 2

<6.7<|7< II<S 3< 16< 4

< ( > 9< 15<3 1< 3

< 34i no<3 5< 15< 6 27381310< 17

17<9 1< 4 3< 4 ]

O I 3 B<0075i ) 4B

NDNDNDNDND"ID0

NoieiJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not delectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region m RBCs April 2003 IB italicsFreonll3 1 1 2 tnchloro-1 2,2 tnfluoroethane

TaMel VOCxb Pi(e9of 1OBru iC E SIM rj tmf

/U/05

Page 43: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

TifcfalSanMr? of VOO ta Ooad W«

MW MMuficnmiuj Supofund S K Valley Towndup PA

Analyl*

benzeneJromodichJorome thaneiromoforrn

Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChlorofonnChloromethaneCyclohexane

1 "> Dibromo-3-chloropropane>bromochJoro me thine1 2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 DichiorobenzeneI 4-DichlotobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroetbaue1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecii 1 ,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 DichloroetheneI 2 Dichloropropinecis-1 3 Dichloropropenetmu 1,3 DichloropropeneEthyl benzeneFreon 1132 HexanoneIsopropvibenzeneMethyl AcetateMethylcyclohexaneMethyl tert Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanonelMIBK)Methylene chlondeStyrene1 1 23 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1,1,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTn hlorofluoromethaneV\nyl chlondern p-Xvleoeo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneTeiOatmty fjnoifitl I'ffHft1 "tl 11 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran tetnhydro-

unknownTotal TICs

IMPAPrfaUnTWmler MCL

or Risk BawdCoocnitndea

58080

as19001000

51103680

190NA0280

000075600

ISO75

J50400

57701005

044044700

59000/500

NA4/006300

26200041100

005J5

10007020055

13002

NANA

10000NANA

NANANANANANANA__NA____

PA Act 2 C™33-WiUr MSC (Moo-ReddendaL Died

Aautfer)

5808010

58004100

5100900803

N A /02$0

00560060075

100011057701005

NANA700

170000NA

23001 00000

NA204105

100035

10007020055

20002

NANA

10000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

SBR-*

\2T9tO4

N87352-4

< 11<l 6<055<OS6<074< 1 3< 1 1<077< 1< 3 7

<041<066<087< 5 6< 0 9< 2 3

<097< 0 9<1 4<3 1<065< 1 71091770

5<054<036< 0 4< 1 3< 1 7< 3 6<1 7< 3 l<081< I 4<3< 1

<06<0684210<07<3

< 1 2877584

< 3 3135<18<086 '<086

<005«015

066B

NOND61 1NDNDNDND61 I

ssr vIJ2IAM

N86836-I

31 8< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15<2.5<023<0 15<023<073

<008I<0 13< 0 1 7< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035<08I

171< O I 7<0 I I<0071<OOS<027<OJ5<073<033<063<0 16<028<059< 0 2<012<014154

< O U<061<025< O I 7404

<06786

<03«<0 17< O I 7033B013126

52 JNNDNDNDNDNDND

52 J

SSP 1 tTXjT)

I-TIAK

NS6S36-IO

332< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15< 1 5

<023<0 15< o j< 0 7 3

<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<018<029<062<0 13<035< O S I

167<0 17< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<0-8<059< 0 2

< O I 2<0 14

154<014< 0 6 l<025<0 17382

<0678

<036<0 17< O I 70 3 B014 .126

NDNDNDNDNDVDND0

ssr iIJ2I/O4

SS6O6-3

<2.3< 0 3 1<0 11<0 17<0 15< ^ 5<0 J<0 15<0-J< 0 7 3

< O M I0 13

<0 17< 1 1<0 11<0<7<0 19<0 11<0»< 0 6 2< O I 3< 0 3 5< 0 8 I7J5

< 0 1 7<Q 11<0071<00»<027<035<073<033<043<0 16<021<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14

62<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17

43<067

3 3<OJ6<0 17<0 170 1 7 B<0075

552

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

ssr 5IJ7&04

NT71W-

46063

<or:<o u

03< 50*t

<0 31046

1 <0 IIS0 6

<0 15

<o ><s< 0 f 1< 0 3 9<03«<058< 1<0^<069< 1 6

9<034< Q 2 2<0 14<0 16<OS4<069< 1 5<066< 1 3<032< 0 5 5< 1 i< 0 4 I<024<0271040

<028< 1<049< 0 3 3

1341 3

< 1 3<073<034<034<0056<0075

6 7

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

ssr i*I-/1104

SM941 i

3< 0 3 I< 0 I I

0 17<0 15< _ 500 |0 1' l0 _') 1

D I M IU 1') P! 1

<0 18(1471) 19

<0 I IO'"*

< 0 6 2< 0 1 3<035< O I I<024<0 17< Q I I<007I<00«<027<035< o n< 0 3 3<063<0 16<0 J<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14<037<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17<0 13

Oi7<066<036<0 17<0 17

<0056<0075

0066

NDNDNDNDNDNDND0

NotesI estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substanoally above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detected

USEPA Region ffl RBCs April 2003 in tolicifreonl l3 I 1 2 mchloro- 1 !"> tnfluoroethane

Tiblel VOCxb Pige 10 f 11O Bntn AC Is** Inc

Page 44: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

T MilSuoMmry gf VOO ta Grand W»

MW Muultcmnat Superfuad S tc Vilfcy Towufcip PA

Aiulrtc

VolaOl* Orgmie ComfommJ* (jigOJ

ienzenefromodichlccome thaneSrorooform

Bromome thaneBuunone (MEK)

Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlonde

ChlorobcnzeneChloroethaoeChloroformChi orome thaneCyclohexane

1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane3ibromochlorome thane1,2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 j Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodjfluoromethane1 1 Oichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecis 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Oichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis- 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans- 1 3 DichloroororjeneEthylbenzeneFreoo 1132 rfexanoneIsoDroDvlbenzeneMethyl AcetateVlethylcyclonexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 Dentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 1 22 TetnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 ,2,4-Tnchlorooenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethanel.l.2TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneV nyl chloridem p-Xyleneo-XyleaeXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneT* f nYi nBWHfff"' vfffa^''/*Tthl

1 Propene. 2-brotno-alcohoUryrln»lk»nr/>nreqe

Dimethyl nilfideFuran, tetrahydro-ketonaunknownTotal TICs

"CSEPTUSSBSrWater MCL

orfUskBaMdfiMiceutr^tfaMi

58030

as19001000

51103680

190NA0 280

000075600

ISO75

350800

57701005

044044700

590007500

NA61006300

2600041100

005.?5

100070200

55

13002

NANA

10000NANA

•yMT-.n..^ tu*KNANANANANANANANA

W«i«r MSC (Noo-ReUdrottal. Uirt

Awiifcr)

100005

808010

58004100

5100900803

NA0 280

00560060073

100011057701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20

4105

100035

100070200

55

20002

NA ,NA

1 0000NANANA

NANANANANANANANA

WPZ-J

OW1VO4

N779I1-4

< 2 3< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15< 5<023<0 15<0-3< 0 7 3<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029<062< 0 1 3<035<08l

33 1< 0 1 7< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<OJ3<063<0 16<028<059< 0 2

<0 12<0 14

259<0 14<061<023092 J

145<067<066<03«<o.n< O I 7

<0056<0075036

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo

WFZ-1

l-O-fl>4

S86941 1

< 1 3< 0 3 l<0 11<0 17<0 15< 5<023<0 15< 0 _ 5< 0 7 3<00«1<0 13<0 17< 1 1

<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035<08I278

<017< 0 I I<007l<00«<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<028<059< 0 2

<0 12<0 14

282<0 14<06l<023069 J

134<067<066<036< 0 t<&n

<005«<0075 '058B

NDSDNDNDNDNDSD0

WFZ-J

O^IMX

N7JO02 3

<*6c6 3< ^< 54< 3

<50< 4 6< 3 1< 4 6< 15< 1 6< 6<3 5

< 3 6< 9 3< 3 9< 3 6< ^ »< 1< 2 6< 6 9< 16••10094 1<12< 1 4< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9<15< 6 6< 1 3< 3 2< 5 5< i:<4 1< 2 4< 2 72720< 2 8< 12< 4 941 8644

1313733414

0015 J<0075

045

VDNDNDNDNDSDND0

wrz-3[j^intST7IIM

577 9

< ..«< < 3< 3 7<»3< 57

! 9' i

< 18

) 1< A 1

I

< 4 5< 12

J »< 4 5< 7 2< 15< 3 3< S 6<X)3840<4 i< _ 7<l 8< 2

< 6 7< 8 7<18< « 3< 16< 4

< 6 9< 15<5 1< 3

< 3 44160< 3 5< 15< 6 258'US

/7< 17<9 I<4 3< 4 3

0688<0075

7 2

NDSDVDNDNDVDND0

Notes; estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)

USEPA Region ffl RBCi, Apnl 2003 at italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-1 U-tnfluoroetnane

Table! VOCol»

O Bng 4 G Efifutt J Inc

Page 45: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Table 2Summary of VOO in Passive Diffusion Baj Ground Water S.mplri

MW Manufacturing Superfund Site. Vilky Township PA

Analyte

AcetoneBenzeneJromodichloromethaneJromoform

Bromomelhane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon cetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1 1 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneEhbromochloromethane

2 Dibromoethane2 Dichlorobenzene3-Dichlorobenzene4- Dichlorobenzene

3ichlorodifluoromethane1 Dichloroethane2 Dichloroethane1 Dichloroethene

cis 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropaneas 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneFreon 1132 HexanoneIsopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetatevlethylcyclohexaneMethy tert Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2 pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 1 2 2 TecrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2 4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 1 2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chloridem p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)

USEPA Drlnkt^ WMITMCL or Rtak Sued

CoacMnoea

610*58080

8519001000

5110*3680

190NA0280

000075*600180*

75350*800*

57701005

044044*700

59000*1500

NA<5/00»5500*26

2000*41*too

0053*5

10007020055

1300*2

NANA

10000

PAAct2.Gn^W UrMSCNta-RoMntfU. IM Aqriftr)

100005

808010

58004100

5100900803

NA0280

00560060075

1000HO57701005

NANA700

170000NA

2300100000

NA20410

5100035

10007020055

20002

NANA

10000

PS-04

1/3/2005

PS l 010305<200<-10<2o<80<40

< '00<40<'0<20<10<->o<20

< IOO< 00<20<40<->o<20<20

< IOO<20<20I 7 9 J34609 7 J<20<20<20<20<ioo<ioo<40

<ioo< IOO<20

< IOO<40

< IOO<203090<20

< IOO<c2032

I 340<ioo<20<20<20<20

PS-07

in/2005PS 7 OI0305

9 I B< I< I< 4< 2

< 10<< I< I< I< I< I< 5

< 10< I< 2< I< I< I< 5< I< I< I139< I< I< I< I< I< 5< 5< 2< 5<5< l< 5< 2<5< l

l»3 J< I<5< I< I

6 2 J<5< I< l< I< l

PS-*71/3/200S

DUPOI0305PS< 10< I

< I

< 4

< 1

< 10<

< 1< 1<: 1< 1< 1< 5

< 10< 1< • >< 1< 1< 1«;5<: 1< 1< 1184< 1< 1< I< 1< 1< 5< 5< 2<5< 5< I<5< 2<5< 1

446J< 1<5< 1< 1

129J<5< 1< 1< 1< 1

PS- Itl/3/">005

PS-IO OI03O5

S 6 B< 1< 1< 4

<

< 10

<

< 1< I< 1< 1< 1< 5

< 10< 1< 2< 1< 1< 1< 5< 1< 1< l31

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 5< 5< 2< 5< 5< 1< 5< 2< 5< 1•>40< 1< 5< 12 356< 5< 1< 1< 1< 1

Notes.J estimated value (below PQL)B not detected substantially above level in field blanks

USEPA Region ffl Risk based Concentration (April 2003) in italicsFreon 113 1 1,2 tnchloro-1,2 2 tnfluoroethane

< less than

Table2 PDB VOC Results DV xls Page 1 of I

0 Bnen A Cere Engineers Inc7/I3M5

Page 46: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Table3Natural Attenuation Indicator Parameter! in Crowd WaierMW Manu/acturtnf Supertax! Sn> V alley Towwfcip, PA

Well orPiezometer

DUNN-07

DUNN-08DUNN-09

)UNN-09 (DUP;DUNN-09

DUNN 11MW-01MW-01MW-02MW-02MW-03

MW-03MW-04MW-04

MW-05MW-05MW-06MW-06MW-07

MW-08MW-08 (DUP)

MW-09MW 12MW 13MW 15MW 15

MW 15 (DUP)MW 16MW 17MW 18MW 19MW20MW22MW 22MW25MW25MW 26MW26MW29MW30MW 30OB-02OB-OSOB-05

OB 10OB 13OB 13OB 14OB 14

WellType

1SSSSoo0SS11o0SS1I0SS1SrDDD0SoSoDDOO11

r>ssoooo0ooo

SampleD*te

12/22/200412/20/20049/15/20049/15/200412/28/200412/23/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/3O/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/20/2004

12/29/200412/29/200412/29/20041 2/29/200412/29/200412/28/20049/16/200412/28/200412/28/200412/21/200412/21/200412/21/200412/21/200412/22/20049/15/200412/27/20049/17/200412/27/20049/17/200412/27/2004

12/23/20049/17/200412/23/200412/29/2004

9/16/200412/28/2004

12/77/20049/16/200412/21/20049/15/200412/22/2004

Manganese

0015907

031703150439

00981<00150525

<0015< O O I 500345

00438< O O I 5

<0015<0015< O O I 5<0015<0015059103830379007890073

<001500271

0017300173

1 63004250 184

< O O I 5<0015<0015<001500189<0015<0015<0015<001S<001500183043404810337

15600430040601640124

AlkalinityTotal ajCaCOj

176215210211236144

742125158173162177158174188204129141255153152167319183145141151243225215228204148164188200138146132173182321117774221277316183192

Chloride

397121395426473<20168<20<20<20697885<J><20<20<207797982652452482741450<20144150144328663107•>12984148136

<20<20104102138<20363293<20<20<2012185329432 1

Methane

0010 1650064700529007110 103

00002200035300015

<000010018100353

<OOOOI<00001<00001<00001000415000374

1 4602660249

000089146

<0000100041

0008300086000034

000022000404

00001300019

000950014

< 00001< 0000100043

00057800756OOOOIJ00015001830022100347

0005450000220000360006700045

Nrtnte

< O O I0 19

0041003800380034

< O O I<001< 0 0 1< O O I0018004

< 0 0 1< 0 0 1<001< 0 0 1<001<001< O O I0038004

0024

<001<001<00!<00t<001<001<001<001< O O I<0010024

<001< O O I<001<001< O O I<001<001<001<001< O O I<001<00l0023<001<001<001

Nrtntt

<0 112

2.222

0791 538345459231 4

282 84 24

<0 110230 1301402635

< 0 I I32

< 0 I I<0 11<0 11

1 9293 1292

<0 11< 0 I I

3837

<0 11<0 11•cO 11

3 119

<0 11242 2

0860861523•»4

TooJNitratn(Mtnu*NhnU)

<0 1

•>•>

0831 538345459131 4• > »2844

<0 10250130 180335

<0 132

<0 1< 0 1<0 1

1 9293 1292

<0 1<0 13837

<0 1<0 1<0 13 !1 9

<0 12422

086088152,324

Sctfaa

15938831 1^99

3 2 2_513513436539 •>382381509508-n i'98666735

1 J36 136117

<20593II 101200114080668814714210283081538543 1851no628107

T4

422227338709135

81 7955129

SulfUt

< 2< 2<< i<<<< 2<< •>< 2<<< 2<< 2< 2<< • >< 2<2< 2<2<2<2< 2< 2< 2< 2<2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2<2< 2T>< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2<2< 2

T«aJOrftmicCar**a

< 11 11 111 << 11 81 5< 1

1

< 1< 1< 1

< \< I

< 1< 1< 1

41

2 2

2 4< 1353< 1< 1< 11 7< 1< 11 5< 1<: 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1955 326

11 3< 1< 1< 1

T«alIMT^MCCarte*

WOL190L<«OL5t>L<«0 JM U LUOLIV) L<80 L1 0 J

410 L

<80L

3 OL3 OL**>V.430 L320 L320 LTOO)330 1350)3401700J410

340LJ40

3 I O J530 L490 L480L500L4SOL390 L390

460L450

J40L320

3 I O L430 L370 L600 JS^L380 /ro

700 L720 L440L430 L

NoteaAll results are in mg/L0 overburden S shallow bedrockJ esomaled value (below PQL)L result is biased low< less thanDUP duplicate sampleCaCO) calcium carbonate

I intermediate bedrock D deep bedrock

T»ble3 NA DV_revued.xls Page 1 of 2

OBnen i Gere Engineers toe7/13/05

Page 47: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Natural AUcaiutioaTaMt)

Well orPiezometer

PZ 1 ITPZ-1 ITPZ-2FTPZ3ITPZ-W1PZ-W1PZW2PZ-W2RW35SBR-4SBR-6SSP-01

SSP-01 (DUP)SSP-02SSP-05SSP 10WPZ2WPZ2WPZ3WPZ3

WellType

ssssssssDSSOosos0oo0

SunpieDM

9/16/2004I2P8/2004I2P8/200412/29/20049/15/200412T2/20049H 5/200412/22/200412P1/200412T>7/200412/29/200412/21/200412/21/200412/21/200412/28/200412/22/20049/15/200412/22/20049/16/200412/27/2004

Manfucst

<001500459020«0248

005620054004030030300192<00150702067066704940553

<0015164

0069<0015<0015

AfcJtafcyTottl**C«CO,

21920521620917319416217327917525031631424120617216819419220*

Chloride

914577<2024 1562556135147236278<20<20 '<20<20<20<2059259720

261

Meth«M

0 190 1570002000130000400005OOH001390000530000240000660012600126

00055200067

< 00001000036000058000045ooon

00550023<00 l0036<00 l<001<001< O O I0084<001004500240027091

<001<001<001< 0 0 t<001<001

Nknl*

14

4

382 2

017017021

<0 111

4 1

1 3081062111315

0230214935

TotftlN«r*tn(Nbna«.Stow)

154

382

0 170 17OJ1<0 1

1 14 I

1 3083065

3-51 5

0230214935

S«Vtte

23530730194393389817952143124•N4

<20<20<y>23430 144339838 1464

SoKUt

< 2<••<<<:<< 2<<< 2<<< 2<<•>

< 2< 2<2< 2< 2

T«M0^*cCartM

1 11 1< 14 6

< I< 1< t< 1< 1< 1

)_s•>99

31 8

< 1

< 1

< I

< 1< I

T*tyIMTIMKCwtoa

570L«»J*y>MOJ*«OLJJOLK»L' •WL6V) L

\ 0<V) J(M) LWtOL5 J O L310

«OL450 L430 L450 L460

Notts.All results are in mg/LO overtutden S shallow bedrock I mtennediate bedrock D deep bedrockJ esomaled value (below PQL)L result is bvaaed low< leu thanDUP duplicate sampleCaCOj calcium carbooaie

Table3 NA DV_revised xli Page 2 of 2

OBnen A Gere Engineers Inc7/13/05

Page 48: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Table 4Mauses Creek Stream Flow Measurements

MW Manufacturing Superfund Site Valley Township PA

STATION

Station A

Station A

Station B

Station B

Station B

Station CStation C

Station A

Station B

Station B

Station CStation C

Station A

Station BStation C

Station A

Station BStation C

JAN2002

Alternate

Alternate #1

Alternate #2

Alternate

2003

Alternate

Alternate

2004

2005

5531

3676

4300

48295387

NMNM

NM

2770

1 9412656

3308

49413862

FEB MAR

NM 27 770

NM 19820

38317

NM

8 893 26 7839216 34662

9750 37312-

1 949 NM

1 846 NM1 820 NM

4-«v

APR

9950

7888

8043

15880

5725

5480

55507583

NMNMNM

MAY

16081

15184

1538725262

3440

4 150

3692

NMNMNM

JUN

9384

1052110009

8886

6434

62914989

4730

NMNMNM

JUL

9333047

1 497

1 447

402

NM

NM

NM

NMNMNM

AUG

206

257401430

656

3897

4353

3696

NM

NMNM

SEP

4600

5 134

6664

6420

^

5570

3832

4507

1 673

1 1552097

OCT

9808

7268

10215

32853

25969

34564

NM

NMNM

NOV

30077

30265

3338936 100

8429

9315

9811

NMNMNM

DEC

5488

4786

5413

6458

2770

1 941

2656

3498

47776 185

Notesall measurements in gallons per minute (gprn)

Measurement points designated as Alternate used to verilyinitial measurements or avoid obstructions in stream channel

NM no measurements taken this monthError of 12 98% calculated for Station B September 2004

Error of 7 15% calculated for Station C December 2004(Error calculations are based on How meter accuracy of 2% and distance measurement accuracy of 0 I fcxx)

O B irn A ( nr tnfiiui i ITjble4 Stream Flow xli

Page 49: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Table 5Summary f Surf a c Water Analytical Raulu VOCi

MW Minuficlu i g S perfund Sue V (ley Towiuh p PA

Analyle

lUbfttl Oftflitt C^M^ tt|M|HD|MED " j

Ac loneienz3 mod hloromethuicJr mof nn

Bromomethane2 B lan nc (MEK)Carbo di IfideCaibo teinchJondeChlorobenzcneChloroclhaneChlocofonn^hiuromelhaiicCyclohcxanc1 2 D bromo-3 chlor propane[>ibromochlofoine(hanc1 2 Dlb omoeUl1 2 DichJorobeox oe1 3 Dichlorobeiuene1 4 Dlchlor benzeneD hi rodfl at methane1 1 Dichloroethtne1 2 DichlococUune1 1 Dichloroethe e

I 1 2 D hloroclhIrani 1 2 Dl hloroethen1 J D hloropropanc i 1 3 D hlorop opeUan 1 3 Oi hloropropcncElhylbenzeneFeo 1132 He onliopr pylbc z ncM Ihyl AceuieMclnylcy lobe anMethyl ten B lyl Elbei (MTBE)4 M Ihyl 2 pe la unc<MlBK)Meinylene chlorideSiyre e1 1 2 2 TelrachlufocthancT irachJofoethcT luene1 2 4 Tn hlorobcnienc1 1 1 Tmhlorocthaoc1 1 2 T >chlofoe4banfn hlorocthencTrKbkHofl arumc4AaaeV yl Morukcnp Xykneo-XylcncXylcAC ( oull

Peniayl anla Water QualityC lie la

Continuous

w86000

130NS370

55003200NS560240NS390NSNSNSNSNS16069150NSNS

3 1001500NS

1 4002200

6161510NSNSNSNSNSNS

SUOO«*»

NS210I4O33026

6106104V)NSNSNSNS

10

M rtaum

450000640NS

1 80028000230000

NS28001200NS

1900NSNSNSNSNS820350730NSNS

151)007500

NS6100II 000

310JIO

2900NSNSNSNSNiNS

26 DUO11000

NS1 000700

1700IHJ

31)00)400JM»

HiNSNiNS

1 100

SWOI9/13/2004

< 10< |< l<4<2

< 10< 2< l< l< 1< 1< 1<5

10< 1< 2< l< l< 1<5< 1< 1< 1

111

11

< 55255

< 15251

0»3 j

1511151111

S W O I1/3/2005

< 10< 1< 1< 4<2

< I O< 2

1< l< 1< 1< 1

< 10< 1< 2< l< )< 1

5< 1< 1< 1

1< 1

< l1

55255151511

5

1t5I111

SW029/13/2004

< I O1

< l

<2< 10

2< 1< 1< I< l< l<5< I O< 1< 2< 1< 1< 1< 5< 1< 1< |

36< 1< 1

11

<5<i

2< S

515

< 251

95< 1

51

067)11)

51111

SW-021/3/2005

< I O< 1< 1

<2< 10

21

< 1< 1< l< 1< 5

< 10< 1< 2< 1< l

15

< 1< 1< 1171

1< 1< 1< 1< 1

55255

< 5< 2

51

)57< 1

511

9651111

SW039/13/2004

< 10< 1< 1

<2102

< l< >< 1< 1< 1

• C I O< 1

2< 1< l< 1

5< 1

1< 1402< 1< 1

1< 1< 1

5525

51

< 1251

72 7 L

< 51

122)

J< 1

11

SW-031/3/2005

< I O< 1< 1

<2< 10< 2

1<1< 1< l•cl< 5

< 10< l

2< 1< l< 1

5< 1< 1< 120 «

1

< 11

< 1552

< S515251

5451511

n5

iii

SW049/13/2004

< 10< l< 1

4<2

< 10<2< 1<1< 1< l< 1<5

< I O1

<2< 1< l

151

< 11

3051

< 1< l

11

< 5525515251

55415

016)161

51111

SW 04 (d p)9/I3/2U04

< 10< 1< 1< 4<2

< 10< 2

1< 1< 1< 1<5

<10< 1

< 2< 1< 1< 1

5< 1

11

31111115i2551\

25

561151

O K I17

51111

SW 041/3/2005

< I O1

< 1<4

2< 10< 2< 1< l< 1

1< 1<5

< 10< 1

2

< 1- 1

5< 1

11

16< 1< 1

1115

52551\

251

4O 111\11

9151111

SW 04 (d p1/3/2005

10114

<2102

< 1< l< 1< l< 1< 5

< 10< 1

2< 1< 1< 1<5< 1< 1< 116

< 111115425

51\)51

)»91511

9651111

SW-059/I3/201M

SW051/3/2005

<5055

<2010

<50< 10< 5<5<5

55

<25<50

510

< 5< 5

525

< 555

it 155

< 555

252510252552510255

1 Mil5

255

7167

)5555)

10114

<2< 10

2< 1< 1< 1

< 1< 5

< I O121

< 115

< 1< 1

1

11111

< 5521

515

251115111)1111

Nulu.I I nuicd lu Ibclo*L I biaxd lo«U 004 J ctlcil tubUA lly bu IK

I con I I ) II hlulu I 2 2 U II uioNS

Page 50: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

SVOO —< «7».

AMljU

2 4 6-TrKhtorjfteol

1 tDmrtivifiooi

2 4-DuoirocoJueBe6-DuDmxoJueae

2-Chlonxa(iMi^cne2-Olloioptenol2 MRhytapUukne2 Methv^phml2 Nitrouihoe2 NuroeAenol3*4-M«hy1pliei»l3] DichJorobeoiidine3 NimMnUine4 6-Dimm>-o-cre3ol

4XHoro-3 mediyl phenol4-ChfccOMiiile4-Chlorophe yi pheoyl etfaer4-NanMoUuie-Nitrophenol

AceMptoykne

AadncneAnzmeBeauUebydeBenuX )«Mhnua.BennX IpyiaieBeanKbAionatamBemo<|Ju)pefytet*Beaux kMbonnheaeba(2-Chloroedio y)nednxbuO-ChlonxaliyOahefbn<2-Chkmiioprcf)yl)etfaerbo<2 E*yt« yDptiltiibieButyl benzyl ptuhibdCiprolKamC»teotedry**.Dtoazo(iJi)anltnx8c

Dnhyi ptotubKDm>rtw<F*i*»litt

Di n-octyl phtbalM

=Uwrene

H xjcfakmtwudieae•1 ucbJorocyctopemdieDC

H achJoroettuneInJenoU.- 3-cd)p>raiesophorme

NaphHuttneNitrobenzeneN NitnMO-di-B-pujvyiiiiiiaeN Nmwoipboiytamint

Phenol•ytrae

r MMH*i ffJMgm!**.uflknowToolTE So»V<*cie

Araclor 1016MoctalZZlArockr 1232Araclor 1242Anxlocl 4<*Lnctcrl254Mcctor 1260

Q»*T

NS91V4013013032000

NS110NSNSSS

1600NSNSNS165*30NSNSNS470NSNSNSNSNSNS01NSNSNSNSNS

6000NS91035NSNSNSNSNS80050021NS40NSNS2112

NS210043110NS»NS1

NSNS

*I-«J*

0014001400140014001400140014

Crtort.Mum

NS4401700MO66016009*>NS560NSNSNS

NOONSNSNSSO270160NSNSNS

2300NSNSNSNSNSNSOJNSNSNSNSNS

30000NS

4JOO140NSNSNSNSNS

40002300110NS200NSNS10s60NS

10000140

4000NS300NSJ

NSNS

F«—*<«H

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

9/13/2004SW 1 09I1O4

NANA

NANANANANANANA

NANANANANANA

NA, NA

NANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANA

NANA

NANANA

NANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANANANA

NANANA

NANANA

NANA

J

ND0

052052

<052OJ2OJ2

<0il052

SW.OIWI6/2004

SW 1 M| jo,

J 55J555522_2_2

555J2J5 55J5JS-S5355222.25-55.5

25522-2

1135125J5J121212122.21212121212122.2121255122J2.22J221222J

225512222_

2-2225522225322

ND0

NANANANANANANA

SW-OII/V2005

S» I OIOJ05

5 1n5 15 12022

5 15 12

5 15 15 15 15 15 1M2

5 15 12

5 13)

25 12

5 13 122222222222222

5 12222222

205 1

2222

51202

5 12

ND0

05<05< 0 5

03<OJ

03

SW-02V1V30M

sw miv»

NANANANA

NASANANANANANANANANA

NANA

NA

NANAVA

NANANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANANANA

NANA

NANANANA

NANANANANANANA

NANA

NANANANANA

NANANANANANANANA

ND0

034<OJ4

0-540340.54034

rw-o:VIV3B4

SW 0»I«W

> t5 «U

ai

t t;t

;»16I t

6>2

)65t

;t2

56

565i2J2 212122-21212-2122212^2-22256J22

2

n5 6

2

2 212

21 56

222

5622

ND0

NANANANANANA

SW-021/V3003

1)1)a

55

51!11<X

f5

53>

I5

552!

22

22212

1

2

2

205

2520

52

ND0

0310310.310-310.51031

NOKI; eununlntoe(belo»PQL)L raUJ noB rnnND ax detected (no PQLitpcrad wife TIC*)NS

qu tan miy be

TiMe6 Suifrce Wier SVOC ill Fife I of 3

O ftrvjt A C Efifo* n, /w

Page 51: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

—4 6-Tnchk»Dtjda»4

2 6-DummtueDB

2-dkjcoptew*

2 Ndrtwnhae

33 DKhtoro&enndm3 NapcwuJmc4 6-DuatrD-o-craot

tcw££3^^

SSC"^*-A«I .J|>»UIM

AnuvBaukkhyde

Bom* Ipym.Beartbttkunaln.

bu<2-Oiloncitaoi;)anlimtrua-CUoroahyfltlhtr

S"DtemcAniDnfcytpfcMM

DKMCtyl pbMBI

HeudUontaium

HexjcUoncyctopcaadicaBHcuchtonntnc

jophonne

N Nim»o-ilMi-tiiuinlM»»

Ftaoi>«-.ph^ ^HKlE^ ^ ^ ^ ^M^ ^Hfi

Tool 1C Sam- Vote*^•jmpH t fff Hff"Aroctor 1016Anckxl221Arock* 1232Arelar 1242

A^EI™Aractor 1260Nan1 atm«td vita (below PqU

UJ ntt iklrrmt. | liiiala

O— »T

NS91340130130320200NS110NSNSNS

1600NSNSNS16

30NSNSNS470NSNSNSNSNSNS01NSNS

NSNS

6000NS91035NSNSNSNSNSMM50021NS40NSNS21

12NS

2100

110NS59NS1

NSNS

gSHk4jUJ

001400140014001400140014

•jrbcncain

Crterfc

NS4601700MO6601600940NS560NSNSNS

1000NSssNS

160

NSSSss

2300SSNSNSNSNSNSOJNSNS

NSNS

30000NS

4500140NSNSNSNSNS

40002500110NS200NSNS105toNS

10000140

4000NS300NS5

NSNS

P*" " W

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

IB Of OOpKCl

•1 3/2004

SANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASA

ISA

SANASANANANANANASANANANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

ND0

<053<053

033OJ3

<053

SW.03«I6/2004

12

it)4

5 4

2224

54

5 4

245 45 4

5 45 4!454a

54

5 42 25 412

2125 4

245 45 42-22-22-2

2-22-2

222-2

24245 42424241422

242

a51222

<2224225422

5424

ND0

NANANANANANANA

SW-OT1/3/3005

i

5

11111

J11J 255 25 2

',

i5215-

1

1152115 254111111

111111

1111111111521111111111112 1

215 21111il111152212 1521 \

ND0

OJ03

OJOJOJOJ

JW-04V1V20D4

SASASANASASANANANANASASASANA

SASASA

SA

SASANASASASANASANANANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAHA

NANANANANANASANA

5 J5 1

0.56036

<OJ»OJ6OJ«056056

V1V20X

NANANASANANANANANANANANANANASASA

SANA

SA

SANAMAMASASANASANANANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASANANANASANASANA

., NA» NA

NANANANA

ND0

OJ7057OJ7OJ7OJ7

<OJ7057

^

145 3

< 5

22

) i

1 !) i

1

,,

. .

U5 J_25 55 5244

24

141424242412242 224245 524244

24

24

51

24242424S.S22225J24

ND0

NANANANANANA

NDNS nomndiid

IrtlTXU)

SUI«K> WKf-SVOCi ib I>iC>2of3O 8nr* 4 Girt Enfute fur

Page 52: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

Anijm

1 1 Botany!

2 4 6-TnchlonJptaoi2 4-Dictik>row«T»l

2 4-OmmiDkiaie

2-CWon»iaoM>»kr«''-CUanpfaetnl

2 MabvluiibhifeK2 Meftytpbenoi

NnnMaihae

3 3 DKhkxobeazxiiae

4 6-Duuoo-o-crtsol4-Bnanophenyt ptaiyl star

-CUoromlme

4-NimJUihae

AcejuptaheneAceaaptahyteaeAceiopbeooaeAiuhnceneAmztneBauUehydeBom* laobraxacBenzot feyracBeozo<b)f»ioni»hegeBenodJulpcrytaeBeauxk)fluanolfaeaebntt-auoroono ypgeduncbtl<2-Cllk»oe*iynelher

bo<2 Ediyfee yOpMhalaB

.apl'Obctan

CarfcazofeCtoyieneD4auaUiHnd»ica»

DirdiylptilbalaleDimethyl pMhalattDi-o-tatyl pnthalucDi o-octyi poihalaleFlucnniheDe•luafeiie•1 achlorobenzeiie

H xacbjorofeutadjeoe

H KhloroettuK

boptonxieNipAttsUeoc'JnTobfflji m

Pagd»><y 1

Phenol

Toot TIC Scm-VolaBje

Aicckr 1016Anxla-1221Aroctor 1232Arockr 1242Aicckx 1 aAn>clorl2M

PlBB^ytral

O»*7

KS91WO

130

130320200

N5noNSNSNS

1600NSNSNS165430NSNSNS470NSNSNSNSNSNS01NSNSNSNSNS

6000NS910J5NSNSNSNSNS100SOD21NS40NSNS21

12NS

21004]110NSS»NS

1NSNS

0014001400140014001400140014

:riMri>

NS•4017006606601600WONS560NSNSNS

8000NSNSNSJO270160NSNSNS

2300NSNSNSNSNSNSOSNSNSNSNSNS

30000NS

4500140NSNSNSNSNS

40002500110NS200NSNS10560NS

10000140

4000NS300NS5

NSNS

NSNSNSNSNSNSNS

"16/2004CAJTCBiMi*

! 75 75 75 723132.35 75 72.35 7575 75 75 7

*"232J575 72 35 72J2-32.35 723575 72.31.32.32.323232.3132.311131313135 7

<1313132313131313235713

<132313135 723

< 2 35715

NO0

NANANANANANANA

SW-041/3/2005

•w -» oioxo

!2515.252212 12 15.25-2115 252525 25.2

<521

2.155.2

1SI21

111522 15-25.2

<ll11111111111111117,1

<ll11_l

11< 5 2

111111212 1

12 1

121522 11111

<ll215J212 15-221

ND0

031OJ1OJ1

<0-!1<OJ1

051

1/V2005DUTO10KB

5 25 25 25

111115 251155 2525 2552

1•il5 25 2115221.111S 2115 25211111111111111111111111111115 2111111112 12 12 111

I52111111112 15221115211

NO0

<0510.5 1OJ10510.5 1051

rw-mWl 3/3004

rw 5 a*iv»

NANA

AA

AAAAAAAA

NNNS<4HNANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASANANANANANANANANANA

ND0

053OJ3031033051053

rw-as *«HMDM

r* i <Kna4

;t!•11!»2

5*5 42-2545 616!4!656

5tt,

56

11254125t5612122_

U2_112UUIS12U12I_125612121212121212122*t

12

12125622125611

NO0

NANANANANANA

I»«i/ioaas

sw i iiaxs

121616141622

1616-!

1 66

1»16

6t,

616

1 6

a

U56

1616_2

2-2-2

12UU_2_J

U12_2

-21256_2

2.2.2-22

_2

2

221»U

' U

122

5622125611

NO0

052OJ2032052052052

NanI esumMed vikM (below PQL)LUJ Unu may be nwcunte or nnpnca

ullyibowND not deeded (no PQL reporttd wvfa TX>)NS no

TabM Surface Wner SVOC Pife3of3

0 Bnt* AC rt Enf ottrr for7//JXJ5

Page 53: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

MW Manuficmnnt; Supertund S (t ViJky T oiuftip PA

AnmJyte

M<*t,<*L>

Aluminum

Antimony

Aneiuc

lanum

Beryllium

r^rimii|m

^alctuni

rhronuuni

•fex Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

ran

Lc*d

^•CTKTT1'1^

tfangttCM

Mercury

Nickel

^ouuium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

fMurrmmamfmtat .T til PhosphorusTola! PhosphorusT ul Suspended Solids

Crtert*Continum

NS

220

150

4 100

NS

NS

10

19

03

NS

1

on

NS

46

NS

NS

13

100

NS

NS

Mutan

NS

1 100

340

21000

NS

NS

16

95

03

NS

1

14

NS

NS

NS

65

510

NS

NS

D

DTDTDTDTDTDTD1DTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTD

DTD

D

9/13/3)04SW 1 091304

<200< 5< 5< 5

5<200

<200UJ<5

< 5<4 '

< 4

3760037600< 10< 10

<005<005<50<50<2S<25255

<100<3<3

986010200417446< 0 2< 0 2<40<40

<5000<sooo

<5<:5

< 10< 101910019600< 10

10<50<50<20514

<007<007

< 4

1/3/2005SW 1 010305

<2oo200

< 5

< 5

< 5

< 5

<200200

<s54

4

23800-2SOO

10< 10005

<005<50<50<25<2S169

< 100< 3< 3

68006470313259< 0 2<OJ<40<40

<50005000<5< 5< 10< 101070011 100< 10

to50

<50<20<20

<005<005

< 4

sw-oj9/13/2004SW 2 091 504

SW-02\nnoaiSW 2 OIOXH

<200< 200

5< 5< 5< 5

< 200200 UJ

5< 5

4

< 4

3940038600< 10

< 10

005

<005<50<50<25<25196100

< 3< 3

10600101002S4-54< 0 2< 0 2<40<40

<5000<5000

< 5< 5< 10< 101900019000< 10< 10<50

J <5°<20<20

<007< 4

<yt>< SB

5< 5< 5< 5

<2003)0

5< 5< 4

4

2510023900< 10< 10

<005<005<50<50<23<25178

< 100< 3< 3

726969102623 1< 0 2<0-2<40<40

<5000<5000

< 5< 5

10< 101080010900< 10< 10<50<50<20<20

<005< 4

SW4»

9/IV7004SW 3 091 KM

swx»I/V20Q5SW 1 OlOKtt

200

2005

5

55

200

300 UJ5

54

4

4190041600

10

10

<005<005<50

50<2S

<23

< 100

100

< 3< 5

11)00

11800

191

236

< 0 2

< 0 2

<40<40

<5000<5000

< 5< 5< 10< 101870018900

1010

<50<50<20374

f

<007

KM

ya»i)^

3X1ya

•,*4

4

•70UO-fWO

10

10

0050 J

50

»

-5J 73«7

100)

< )r i n)I I t\J

31 3227< 0 2< 0 2<40

40

5000< WOO

5

5

10

10

11200

11600

1010SO

50

20.548

<0057

SW-04*IVTDD4

SW4 0*1104

sx3D\

*DO

J» LI

4

4

4^000<MUQ

010

005005

50X>J25

150100

< 33

1160011400203194

0 2

0

40

<40

sooo<000!

J

10

10

1800017900

101050

50

J, 1

30 1

<0(77

Noto.NS aonandinl.

suadant depeodi on pH or other waBr-qnibty coodiooaalio sampled on 9/I6AM far ibon hokt-amc paimmtlen

J ^mm.t~< thie (below PQL)

L rEull u biased lowUJ not -frtfTtT** quannucon 1 nut may be

inaccurate or impreciseB oot 'V*f-M«j flifr«««*naiiy above level in Geld blanks

T Total D Dissolved

Tabte7 Surface Water Melalsjils Pitt lotO Bnm iO f 11* If

7//J/O5

Page 54: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

of Svfect Waur Analytical Rente Sfaofc.

MW Manufacun I Supcrfund S * Vilky Towndup PA

TSS

Ansrjrtt

Motto fft/U

Aluminum

Antimony

Anemc

lanum

Jery Uium

'•ftmiurp

Calcium

Chromium

lex Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

run

Lead

"^IWTVf^ym

bl ngf*****

Mercury

Nickel

*otusium

>elemum

Silver

Sodium

Thiilium

Vuudium

Zinc

rotal nuuphonuTotal PtxapooraTool Suspeaded Sobdi

P«M»ytT»Dfa Wiur QualityCrrurt.

Coodnooai

NS

120

150

4100

NS

NS

10

19

03

NS

1

077

NS

46

NS

NS

13

100

gM**^

NS

NS

MUBDOBI

NS

1 100

340

21000

NS

NS

16

95

03

NS

1

14

NS

NS

NS

65

510

NS

NS

DTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTOTDTDTDTDTDTOTDTnTDTO

D

SW-049/13/2004DUT091304

<200< 200< i< s< 5

5200

<200UJ< 5< 5< 4

< 4

4290042300< 10< 10

<005<005<50<50<23<23179

< 100< 3< 3

1180012000251161

<02< 0 2<40<40

<5000<5000

< 5< 5<10< 1018700I8SOO< 10

10<50<5029326

<007<007

4

SW-04/3/2005

SW-4 01030)

<2OO<200< 5< 5

55

<200200

55

< 4

< 4

140027200< 10< 10

<005<005<50

50<2351 3140

< 100< 3< 379»7(4023 1219<02<oa<40<40

<SOOO<5000

< 5< 5

< 10< 101070011600< 10

10<50

. <50<20<20

<005<005

4

SW.04/3/2005

DUTO10305

<MOSO

55

< 55

<3»MO

554

4

27900ttoo< 10< 10005OOi

<50<50

23<23142100

3< J

11107740234

1 4< 0 2< 0 2<40<40

<50005000< 5< 5

< 10< 101100011300< 10

10<50<50<20<20

< 005<005

< 4

SW-03WI3/2OX5W 5 09IXM

10400200

5555

200SOU

554

4

5970059500

1 5 2< 10005

<0055050

94223

19*00< 100

103< J

1930019300mo4(702

< 0 2<40<40

<50005000< 5< 5

< 10< 10

< 50005000

1010

<50<50294J5

0 14<007

611

SW-03/V20»

SW 1 010305

n«x3JO

?;

195

-51SB

5s

!4

(43X15 WOO

3)0

005005

5150

"770J

26400100

2273

20100163004200172

< 0 2<02<40<40

<5000<5000

57 5

< 1010

50005000

1010

<5050

770<»

0 N<005

IZ20

Notei.NS oa

uindad dependi on pH or Mbcr vucr-qulny coodmooiLio untried on 9/16AV1 forinon bold-ome pmmetai

J ntumttd vtkK (bcJaw FQL)L remit u bused lowUJ not detected, quinutinon limit may be

inaccurate or imprecucB not detected subuuoally above level in field bUnkiT Total D Diuolved

Table? Surface Waier Metals xlj

O Snt* iC E g Kf

Page 55: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

FIGURES

Page 56: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

mooCM

*T3(X

ft

mr>n•«•in

o>

RGURE 1

•<*•in

00mCMo

V)*-ioVo"

CL

ADAPTED FROM RIVERSIDE DANVILLE WASHINGTONVILLE AND MILLVILLE PENNSYLVANIA U S G S 7 5 MIN QUADS

MW MANUFACTURING> SUPERRJND SITE

" ( VALLEY TOWNSHIP, MONTOUR COUNTY, PA.PENNSYLVANIA

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SITE LOCATION MAP

3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET

1 MLE

JWLOMETER

FILE NO 35433001-57JULY 2005

SCALE 1 24000ENGINEERS INC

Page 57: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

OKNBUflOCH EXIWCnON HEU.

O OKMUMXN UOMJ1OM40 HCU.

e awu» aoxocx uourcxwo

IT B A WJLATON V l/K TOK Wt PEKSOXIMISS «CIMC IMOI DC MCCTON OTAuansai BOBI. n »o» MS ooauan 1 =160

I MB W«D I /I/O. / 7/U <M>

inm. HTUD

QUID

IN CHARGE OF TAN

DESIGNED BY MTC CHECKED BY MSK

DRAWN BY RJDNO QMt REVISION INIT

ENGINEERS INC

MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUNO SITE

SITE PLAN

nu NO

3S4M001-M

DATE

JULY 2005

Page 58: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

a o A vnuTON or uw KH AWT POBON.muss icon iMn nc onecnoN or AUCBGED BMMDl 10 «.« MS [MX1MKI

LCBEM)

BULL VALVE

RJ5W CONTROL VALVE

STATIC LiXER

FUOW OfUCNT

CCNinFUGAL PIM>

UETOaNO PUMP

AIR OPERATtD OffHKMIPUUP

ROTART L06C PUMP

BUXKER

AOOmONAL COUVMENT REO DFDR TREATMENT Of OU-SCONSTRUCTION

««TEB HOSC CONNECTION

IN CHARGE OF TAN

DESIGNED BY RJD CHECKED BY MSK

DRAWN BY MO NO DATE REVISION

ENGINEERS INC

MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUND SITE

GROUND WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

AND CONSTRUCTION WATER

TREATMENT SYSTEM

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

FVE NO

33433001-63

OMt

JULY 2005

Page 59: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

i

/VHUOCIME HUKKIV

It E A WXAKM Or UW TOR Hit PERSON.IMtSS ACIMC tMOOl DC UHUMI OTAUOBSOI oaon n M.BI MS ooouMen

UMOI PC OH I

tuoani mMC aouok Mavec KJ. imiou» MMunciumo me" WIID1/1/01. i/i' u *• /i /w

IN CHARGE OF TAN

DESIGNED BY PKL CHECKED E>Y MSK

DRAWN BY RJDNO DATE REVISION INIT

ENGINEERS INC

MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUND SITE

OVERBURDEN GROUND WATERCONTOUR MAP

SEPTEMBER 2004

FXE NO

35433001-59

DATE

JULY 2005

Page 60: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

I

n e A vnuim or u« n» MR POBCN.muss ncmc uaai nc MBCTOK OTAuceeo m>ra<. re «.» MS oaouHen

flux imnD »n unitiu imraf (MID

/§/». / ' J •» /I /W

IN CHARGE OF TAN

DESIGNED BY PKL CHECKED BY MSK

DRAWN BY RJDNO REVISION

ENGINEERS INC

MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUNO S(TE

OVERBURDEN GROUND WATERCONTOUR MAPDECEMBER 2004

FU NO

33433001-80

OAT!

JULY 2006

Page 61: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

so

I

II C A VIOUIBH Of UH RM MfT POBON.IM£B HCTNC UMOOI THE OMEnM OTAuceea OCTCK. K «.« ms DOOUMWI

IN CHARGE OF TAN

DESIGNED BY MBL CHECKED BY MSK

DRAWN BY RJD NO DATE INIT

ENGINEERS INC

MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUND S(TE

SHALLOW BEDROCKGROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

SEPTEMBER 2004

FU NO

35433001-81

DATE

JULY 200S

Page 62: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

CHUM U*

KU.

omuna aantcnx mi.

HQMHOMM miK uaMToiwa

•ILL nm noun wmamim (rr/u&XDB: 1004)

•nooanraai (IOUMI)

tCHCO VCIUNO rm Ilia w*turwc nun nunUJCAIKW (NTiaX.)

MMC WTWB" 0<MIDI VMUO UXMIOMI

gamut, omux) wm ru>

IT 0 A VUUTOI Of M» TOR Mff POTON.uuss (cms uaoi nc nccim or AUCBBO mam. n «.o MS oaouen 1 -160

«LL MC-C01MC 101 OUMI-* S AUO iOtt MD U Mlciiimioi mi uwai nc at ma»ni.

) fit wma AumiD not IMHOID arc mj*rr

/•/M. / 7^U MO

IN CHARGE OF TAN

DESIGNED BY_PKL CHECKED BY MSK

DRAWN BY RJD NO O»TE REVISON INIT

ENGINEERS INC

MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUNO SfTE

SHALLOW BEDROCKGROUND WATtR CONTOUR

DECEMBER 2004MAP

FU NO

39433001-62

OATt

JULY 2006

Page 63: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

1650 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

SUBJECT

FROM

TO

MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteFive- Year Review Report

Peter W Schaul,Remedial Office

Abraham Ferdas, DirectorHazardous Site Cleanup Division (3HSOO)

Attached for your signature is the third Five Year Review Report for the MW ManufacturingSuperfund Site in Montour County, Pennsylvania The physical aspects of the remedial actionhave been completed in accordance with the Record of Decisions for Operable Units 1,2 3 4 5and 6 The remedy at the Site currently protects human health and the environment

I recommend that you sign the Five-Year Review Report

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine freeCustomer Service Hotline 1-800-438-2474

Page 64: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

1650 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

SUBJECT MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteFive-Year Review Report

FROM Peter W Schaul, ChiefRemedial Branch (3HS20)

TO Abraham Ferdas DirectorHazardous Site Cleanup Division (3HSOO)

Attached for your signature is the third Five Year Review Report for the MW ManufacturingSuperfund Site in Montour County, Pennsylvania The physical aspects of the remedial actionhave been completed in accordance with the Record of Decisions for Operable Units 1 2,3 4 5and 6 The remedy at the Site currently protects human health and the environment

I recommend that you sign the Five-Year Review Report

CONCURRENCES

SYMBOL

SURNAME

DATE

3HS22

B Khona

/m^L^*\tfl<£

3HS22

B

fyA

4Nishitami "

MjoC

3HS23

J Lowe

^\^^~t>/t1/C^

•>

EPA Form 1320-1 (12-70) OFFICIAL FILE COPY

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine freeCustomer Service Hotline 1-800-438-24 74