third five year review report five-year review report for ... • cwts construction water treatment...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SOWS DoclD
THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT
For
MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteValley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania
AUGUST 2005
PREPARED BY
United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion III
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Approved by Date
Abraham Ferdas DirectorHazardous Site Cleanup DivisionUS EPA Region III
![Page 2: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Table of Contents
List of Acronyms nExecutive Summary vFive-Year Review Summary Form vu
I Introduction 1II Site Chronology 2III Background 5IV Remedial Actions 8V Progress Since Last Five Year Review 15VI Five-Year Review Process ' 16VII Technical Assessment 21VIII Issues 22IX Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions 23X Protectiveness Statement 23XI Next Review 23
Attachment A
Table 1 - Summary of VOCs in Ground Water SamplesTable 2 - Summary of VOCs in Passive Diffusion Bag Ground Water SamplesTable 3 - Natural Attenuation Indicator Parameters in Ground WaterTable 4 - Mauses Creek Stream Flow MeasurementsTable 5 - Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results VOCsTable 6 - Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results S VOCs and PCBsTable 7 - Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results Metals, Phosphorus and TSS
Figures
Figure 1 - Site Location MapFigure 2 - Site PlanFigure 3 - Ground Water Treatment System and Construction Water Treatment System
Process Flow DiagramFigure 4 - Overburden Ground Water Contour Map September 2004Figure 5 - Overburden Ground Water Contour Map December 2004Figure 6 - Shallow Bedrock Ground Water Contour Map September 2004Figure 7 - Shallow Bedrock Ground Water Contour Map December 2004
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review
![Page 3: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
List of Acronyms
• ACOE U S Army Corps of Engineers
• AO Administrative Order
• ARARs Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
• BAT Best Available Tecnnology
• BTAG Biological Technical Assistance Group
• CD Consent Decree
• CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, andLiability Act
• CFR Code of Federal Regulations
• CIC Community Involvement Coordinator
• cis-l,2-DCE cis-l,2-dichloroethene
• CSM Conceptual Site Model
• CWTS Construction Water Treatment System
• DOI Department of Interior
• E&S Erosion and Sediment
• EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
• ESD Explanation of Significant Differences
• FFS Focused Feasibility Study
• FS Feasibility Study
• gpm Gallons Per Minute
• GWTS Ground Water Treatment System
• 1C Institutional Control
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review 11
![Page 4: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• IGWE
• IRAK
• MCL
• MSC
• mg/kg
• mg/1
• NAPL
• NCP
• NFA
• NPDES
• NPL
• O&M
• OSHA
• OU
• PADEP
• PCB
• PCE
• PCOR
• PennDOT
• PEP
• PFD
• PP&L
Interim Ground Water Extraction
Interim Remedial Action Report
Maximum Contaminant Level
Medium Specific Concentration
milligrams per kilogram
milligram per htej-
Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution ContingencyPlan
No Further Action
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
National Priorities List
Operations and Maintenance
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Operable Unit
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Polychlonnated Biphenyl
Tetrachloroethene
Preliminary Close Out Report
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Performance Evaluation Plan
Process Flow Diagram
Pennsylvania Power and Light
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review 111
![Page 5: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• PRP
• PVC
• RA
• RACK
• RAO
• RD
• RI
• RI/FS
• ROD
• RP
• RPM
• SARA
• SVOC
• TCE
• TCLP
• TSS
• USFWS
• VOC
• VSL
• VC
• WBZ
Potentially Responsible Party
Polyvmyl Chloride
Remedial Action
Remedial Action Completion Report
Remedial Action Objective
Remedial Design /
Remedial Investigation
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Record of Decision
Responsible Party
Remedial Project Manager
Superfund Amendments and Reauthonzation Act of 1986
Semivolatile Organic Compound
Tnchloroethene
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Total Suspended Solids
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Volatile Organic Compound
Vegetative Support Layer
Vegetative Cover
Weathered Bedrock Zone
micrograms per liter
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review IV
![Page 6: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Executive Summary
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing this Five YearReview report for the MW Manufacturing Superfund Site (the Site) pursuant to theComprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)section 121(c) and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution ContingencyPlan (NCP)
The purpose of a Five Year Review is to ensure that a remedial action remains protectiveof public health and the environment and is functioning as designed This document willbecome a part of the Site file
;
The Site is located in Valley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania The Site isapproximately 15 acres and is 4 miles northwest of Danville, Pennsylvania 700 feet \vestof State Route 54 and about 1A mile south of Interstate Route 80 The Site is a formermetal reclamation operation that was run by Metal Wire Manufacturing (MWManufacturing) MW Manufacturing reclaimed copper from wire and cable Plasticinsulation surrounding the cable and wire was either chemically or mechanically strippedor separated from the metal at the Site
The Site was listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on June 10, 1986 In August1988, EPA began Remedial Investigation (RI) and subsequently divided the Site in threeOperable Units (OUs) as follows
• OU-1 Ground water cleanup• OU-2 Carbon Pile Waste• OU-3 Fluff waste and Site soils
The above OU numbers and the descriptions were adopted in the WasteLan Howeverdunng the Remedial Design (RD) OUs numbers were assigned in chronological sequenceand additional OUs were added to facilitate RD and Remedial Action (RA) activitiesThus OU numbers were reassigned as follows
• OU-1 Carbon Pile Waste (completed in 1992, off-site treatment and disposal)• OU-2 Fluff waste and Site soils (Selected Remedy of incineration, OU 2 was
replaced by OU-5 in 1995)• OU-3 Ground water cleanup (construction completed in January 2005, operation
and maintenance is ongoing)• OU-4 Public Water Supply (completed in August 1996, and taken over by Valley
Township 1996)• OU-5 Fluff waste (previously addressed under OU-2), storage tanks, lagoon water
and sediments, and Site soils (previously addressed under OU-2) (constructioncompleted in June 2005)
• OU-6 Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Mam Plant Building(completed in 2001)
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review
![Page 7: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
In this Five-Year Review, chronological OU numbers are used
The assessment of this Five Year Review found that the remedies for OU-3, OU 5 wereconstructed/implemented according to the objective of the applicable Record of Decision(ROD) Explanation of Significant Differences (ESDs) OU 6 (Unsafe Building Structureand Debris) was done according to a removal Consent Decree (CD) Sampling andhydraulic monitoring of ground water and surface water is being conducted as requiredby the OU-3 Final Design/Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) Sampling of treatedeffluent from the OU-3 GWTS is being conducted as required by the OU 3 NPDESEquivalency Permit The final cover construction/seeding of the OU-5 remedy wascompleted in June 2005 and will be inspected/repaired as required per the OU 5Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan Building demolition and debris removal forOU-6 was completed in 2001 The Site institutional controls (ICs) were partiallyimplemented under OU-6 by requiring the Site owner to place the removal CD in to thedeed records for the MW Manufacturing property For property located beyond the MWManufacturing Property boundary, the ICs will be implemented as required by the OU-5ROD Additionally, in August 1996, the Valley Township passed an ordinanceprohibiting installation of potable water wells throughout the township
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review VI
![Page 8: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Five-Year Review Summary Form
SITE IDENTIFICATION 1
Site name (from WasteLAN) MW Manufacturing Site
EPA ID (from WasteLAN) PAD98069 1372
Region State PennsylvaniIII
a City/County Valley Township,Montour County
SITE STATUS
NPL status X Final a Deleted a Other (specify)
Remediation status (choose all that apply) n Under Construction X Operating _ Complete
Multiple Oils?* XYes n No
Has site been put into reuse"7 a Yes X No
Construction Completion date
R E V I E W STATUS
Lead agency X EPA a State n Tnbe a Other Federal Agency
Author name Bhupi Khona
Author title Remedial Project Manager
Review period ** 5/20/05 to 7/13/05
Author Affiliation US EPA-Region 3
Date(s) of site inspection 5/26/05
Type of reviewX Post SARA n Pre SARA a NPL Removal only n,Non NPL Remedial Action Siten NPL State/Tribe lead a Regional Discretion
Review number a first n second X third
Triggering actionn Actual RA Onsite Construction at OU#a Construction Completiona Other (specify)
n other
a Actual RA Start at OU#X Previous Five Year Review Report
Triggering action date (from WasteLAN) 6/11/2000OU refers to operable unit
1 Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five Year Review in WasteLAN
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Vll
![Page 9: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd
Issues
No major issues were found ICs for outside the property boundary of MW Manufacturingneed to be addressed for residential or commercial developments that may result in vaporintrusion exposure pathways
Recommendations/
Inform the Valley Township zoning office about the extent of the contaminated groundwater plume and recommend zoning restrictions to prevent any exposure pathways due tovapor intrusion
Protectiveness Statement(s)
The Site has been determined to be protective of human health and the environmentin the short-term because remaining direct exposure pathways have been eliminatedby remedial actions under OU-3, OU-5 and OU-6 The remedy is expected to befully protective of human health and the environment upon attainment of OU-3groundwater cleanup goals, which are expected to require at least 30 years to attainIn the interim, exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are beingcontrolled and ICs are preventing exposure to, or the ingestion of, contaminatedground water Placing the CD with the current property owner's deed record willprovide notice of potential risks and describe what would constitute unacceptablefuture use of the property All threats at the Site have been addressed throughtreatment and off-site disposal of highly contaminated materials including carbonwaste and NAPL-impacted soils, stabilization/backfill of Fluff/sediment/soils andcover of the area
Vapor intrusion is not a current issue since there is no residential housing on-site orwithin the ground water plume area Restrictions on the future use will preventpotential future exposure pathways
Long-term protectiveness of the remedial action will be verified by the OU-5 O&MPlan/Site Controls and OU-3 O&M Plan/Performance Evaluation Plan until theground water cleanup goals are achieved
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Vlll
![Page 10: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Five-Year Review ReportFor
MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteValley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania
I Introduction
The purpose of the Five Year Review is to determine whether the remedy at a Site isprotective of human health and the environment The methods findings and conclusionsof reviews are documented in Five-Year Review reports In addition, Five Year Reviewreports identify issues found during the review if any, and recommendations to addressthem '
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing this Five YearReview report pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation,and Liability Act (CERCLA) §121(c) and the National Oil and Hazardous SubstancesPollution Contingency Plan (NCP) CERCLA § 121 states
If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substancespollutants or contaminants remaining at the site the President shall review suchremedial action no less often than each Jive years after the initiation of suchremedial action to assure that human health and the environment are beingprotected by the remedial action being implemented In addition if upon suchreview it is the judgement of the President that action is appropriate at such site inaccordance with section [104] or [106] the President shall take or require suchaction The President shall report to the Congress a list of facilities for -which suchreview is required the results of all such reviews and any actions taken as a resultof such reviews
The Agency interpreted this requirement further in the NCP, 40 Code of FederalRegulations (CFR) 300 430(f)(4)(u) states
If a remedial action is selected that results in. hazardous substances pollutants orcontaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use andunrestricted exposure the lead agency shall review such action no less often thanevery five years after the initiation of the selected remedial action
The EPA Region III has conducted a Five-Year Review of the remedial actionsimplemented at the MW Manufacturing Superfund Site in Valley Township, MontourCounty, Pennsylvania (the Site) The review was conducted from May 2005 to July2005 This report documents the results of the review Nassau Metals Corp and itsconsultant provided ground water monitoring and other data as required
The Site was listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on June 10, 1986 In August1988, EPA began Remedial Investigation (RI) and subsequently divided the Site in threeOperable Units (OUs) as follows
M W Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 1 of 23
![Page 11: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
OU-1 Ground water cleanupOU-2 Carbon Pile WasteOU-3 Fluff waste and Site soils
The above OU numbers and the descriptions were adopted in the WasteLan Howeverduring the Remedial Design (RD) OU numbers were assigned chronological sequenceand additional OUs were added to facilitate RD and Remedial Action (RA) activitiesThus OU numbers were reassigned as follows
• OU-1 Carbon Pile Waste (completed m 1992, off-site treatment and disposal)• OU-2 Fluff waste and Site soil^ (Selected Remedy of incineration OU 2 was
replaced by OU-5 in 1995)• OU-3 Ground water cleanup (construction completed in January 2005 operation
and maintenance is ongoing)• OU-4 Public Water Supply (completed in August 1996, and taken over by Valley
Township 1996)• OU-5 Fluff waste (previously addressed under OU-2), storage tanks, lagoon water
and sediments, and Site soils (previously addressed under OU-2) (constructioncompleted in June 2005)
• OU-6 Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Main Plant Building(completed in 2001)
Jji this Five-Year Review, chronological OU numbers are used
This is the Third Five-Year Review for the Site The triggering action for this review isthe Second Five-Year Review dated June 15, 2000 as shown in EPA s WasteLANdatabase
EPA Region III has conducted this review of the remedial actions implemented at the Sitedue to the fact that hazardous substances pollutants or contaminants remain at the Siteabove levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure This review wasconducted for the entire Site by the Remedial Project Manager (RPM), and it includes areview based on the recent (2005) completion of remedial action construction for theactive Operable Units (OU-3 and OU-5), and a review of the OU 6 removal actioncompleted in 2001 A detailed review of the performance assessment and remedial actionobjectives for OU-3 and OU-5 will be provided m the next 5-Year Review when moredata are available
II Site Chronology
Table 1 lists the chronology of events for the MW Manufacturing Site
Table 1 Chronology of Site EventsDate1966
EventMetal Wire Manufacturing (MW Manufacturing) acquired the property
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 2 of 23
![Page 12: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1966
1972
1976
1981 1982
Late 1982
October 1 1984
June 10 1986
February 1987
August 1988
March 1989
March 6 1989
June 1990
1992
March 1992
May 19, 1992
June 20 1992
September 30, 1992
March 31 1993
MW Manufacturing used the property for the chemical and mechanicalseparation of copper wire from its plastic insulationMW Manufacturing filed for protection under Chapter 1 1 of the UnitedStates Bankruptcy Code and Philadelphia National Bank acquired thepropertyWarehouse 8 1 Inc and Domino Salvage acquired the propertyWarehouse 8 1 Inc and Domino Salvage reportedly used the property forthe mechanical separation of copper wire from its plastic insulationPennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) inspectedthe Site installed four monitoring wells and collected ground watersamplesWarehouse 81 Inc retained Dunn Geoscience Corp to evaluate conditionsat the Site ,The Site was proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL)
The Site was placed on the NPL
A Removal Consent Order was signed by the EPA and the current Siteproperty owners (Michael G Sabia and Michael G Sabia Jr doingbusiness as Warehouse 81 Limited Partnership) The current Site propertyowners were directed to supply water to the person living on site and tokeep records of the water supply for 5 yearsThe EPA began the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) afterthe current Site property owners elected not to participate Following thecompletion of the RI/FS the EPA divided response actions at the Site intosix OUsOU 1 EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) which selected off siteincineration for the carbon waste as the remedy for OU 1EPA sent a Special Notice Letter to conduct the Remedial Design andRemedial Action (RD/RA) to the current Site property owners whoelected not to participateOU 2 EPA issued a ROD for OU 2 which addressed Fluff impactedsoils and impacted lagoon water at the SiteAdditional PRP investigations discovered records that led to identificationof Nassau Metals Corp (Nassau) and Pennsylvania Power and Light(PP&L) as additional Potential -Responsible Parties (PRPs)OU-1 The excavation and off site incineration of the carbon waste fromOU-1 was completed by the EPAEPA sent Nassau and PP&L a general notice letter regarding theirpotential liability for the SiteOU-3 EPA issued a ROD for OU 3 which addresses ground watercontaminationOU 3 EPA sent Nassau PP&L and the current Site property owners aSpecial Notice Letter which informed the PRPs that the EPA was willingto enter into a federal Consent Decree (CD) to conduct the RD/RAcontemplated by the OU-3 ROD The current Site owners did not respondto the Special Notice LetterOU 3 A Unilateral Administrative Consent Order was issued to each PRPto conduct the RD/RA for OU 3 Nassau and PP&L agreed to conduct theRD/RA for OU 3 During the design phase EPA decided to split OU 3into two OUs OU 3 and OU-4 OU 3 addresses the long term ground
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 3 of 23
![Page 13: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
December 1992
1993 1995
October 1993
March 1994
November 1995
1996 1998
August 1996
April to September1996
December 22 1997
October 2000
October 2000 toFebruary 2001
September 27, 2000
November toDecember 2002October 2003
November 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
water remedy, and OU-4 provided for public water to potentially affectedresidents and businessesOU 2 Nassau petitioned the EPA to reopen the OU 2 ROD
OU 2 Nassau undertook a series of studies to evaluate an alternateremedy for the Site EPA continued to pursue the Remedial Design forOU2OU 2 EPA reopened the public comment period and Nassau submittedcomments to supplement their petition to reopen the OU 2 RODEPA agreed to consider alternatives proposed by Nassau provided thatNassau conduct a treatabihty study and a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS)to re evaluate the remedial alternatives Meanwhile EPA continues withthe OU 2 treatabihty studyOU 2 EPA completed treatabihty study revealed that the selected remedyfor OU 2 had the potential for adverse impacts on human health andenvironment Ultimately EPA abandoned the OU 2 remedy involvingincineration and instead selected the OU 5 remedy involving stabilizationand solidification of Fluff and contaminated soils a remediationtechnology similar to that proposed by NassauOU-3 Nassau conducted a senes of Pre Design Investigation activities forOU3OU-4 Construction of a 17 400 foot public water distribution systemthroughout Valley Township was completed by Nassau providing water to39 residences and 13 commercial establishments The water distributionsystem was turned over to Valley Township in 1996EPA conducted a removal action to remove miscellaneous drums andbuckets containing hazardous materials for off site disposalOU 5 EPA issued a ROD for OU 5 (formerly OU 2) revising the 1990ROD for OU 2 The OU 5 ROD called for ex situ stabilization of theFluff lagoon sediment and surface soils and backfilling of the excavatedareas with the stabilized material Additionally OU 5 provides for the offsite disposal of tank and drum contents and other debns remaining at theSiteRemoval CD was signed between EPA and current Site property ownersMichael G Sabia and Michael G Sabia Jr involving Demolition ofunsafe portions of the western third of the Mam Plant BuildingDemolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Mam PlantBuilding by the current Site property ownersOU-3 EPA issued an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) forOU-3OU-3 Implementation of the OU-3 IGWE Program
OU-5 Final (100%) RD Report was approved by EPA and PADEP
OU 3/OU 5 Construction of the new water treatment building wasinitiated for the CWTS and the GWTSOU 5 Construction of the new water treatment building was substantiallycompleteOU 5 The construction of CWTS was completed and commissioned totreat OU 5 construction waterOU 3 GWTS Design (with OU 5 CWTS) was approved by EPA and
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 4 of 23
![Page 14: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
March/ April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
October 2004
September 2004
December 2004
December 2004
December 2004 toJanuary 2005
January 17 2005
January 21 2005
February 1 1 2005
April 15 2005
April 28 2005
May 23 2005
May 24 2005
May 26 2005
May 27, 2005
PADEP
OU 6 The remainder of the Main Plant Building was razed and disposedof off site as part of Operable Unit 6 (OU 6) by Sabia The StorageBuilding (Butler Building) was modified for use as a temporary chemicaland material storage building as part of the OU 3 remedyOU 5 CWTS was commissioned and startup was completed
OU 3/OU 5 Installation of chemical bulk storage area in the existingStorage Building (Butler Building) was completedOU-5 RA site excavation and stabilization activities completed
EPA issued ESD #1 for OU 5
OU 5 RA activities substantially complete and site wmtenzation forerosion and sediment (E&S) protection (outstanding work includes finalvegetative support layer (VSL) tppsoil and E&S controls)OU 3 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)Equivalency Permit for OU 3 GWTS was issued by PADEPOU 3/OU 5 OU 5 CWTS was cleaned and changed in service to that ofthe longer term OU 3 GWTSOU 3 Startup and operation of the OU 3 recovery wells and GWTScommencedOU 3 Written request was submitted to EPA and PADEP to providenotice of completion of the OU 3 RA Construction Phase and requestedperformance of the OU 3 Administrative Order requiring Start up and PreCertification InspectionsOU 3 Ground Water Treatment System Operation and MaintenanceManual revised for longer term OU 3 treatmentOU-3 Interim Remedial Action Report for Operable Unit #3 wascompletedOU 3 EPA/PADEP approval of March 17 2005 Report granted
OU 3 EPA acceptance of April 15 2005 Interim Remedial Action Reportfor Operable Unit #3OU 5 Written request was submitted to EPA and PADEP to providenotice of completion of the OU 5 RA Construction Phase and requestedperformance of the OU 5 Consent Decree requiring Pre ConstructionInspectionsEPA/PADEP conducted Five Year Review and OU 5 Pre CertificationInspection for both the Completion of the RA and Completion of the Workfor the SiteOU 3 OU-3 Performance Assessment Baseline Monitoring Report wassubmitted which documents 2 quarters of baseline ground water samplingand hydraulic monitoring and the baseline off site wetland evaluations
III Background
Physical Characteristics
The Site is located in Valley Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania (Figure 1) and
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 5 of 23
![Page 15: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
occupies approximately 15 acres of land about 4 miles northwest of DanvillePennsylvania The area around the Site is within the Valley and Ridge physiographicprovince, characterized by a series of linear northeast trending mountains that formalternating valleys and ndges The Site is located in a broad stream valley created byMauses Creek, about 1A mile east of the Site near State Route 54 (Washingtonville Road)Mauses Creek drains to the south and empties into the Susquehanna River at DanvilleFormer Site facilities (a large one-story building and small out buildings two above groundstorage tanks, and other features) were demolished and removed in 2004 during OU 5remedial activities A smaller 3,350 square foot building was retained and renovated forchemical storage as part of the on-site GWTS currently in operation as part of OU 3remedial activities, in addition to the new GWTS building constructed in 2004
/In this part of the State, retreating late Pleistocene glaciers deposited a layer of till(unconsohdated deposits of clay, with intermixed sand, gravel, and silt) ranging up to 40 feetthick These glacial deposits overlie sedimentary bedrock consisting of layered sequences ofPaleozoic shale and limestone Bedrock beneath areas south of the Site includes units of theWills Creek Formation, consisting of thin, interbedded calcareous silty shale and siltstone orargillaceous (shaly) limestone and dolostone Bedrock to the north of the Site consists of theTonoloway Formation, a dark gray, laminated limestone A transition zone between thesetwo formations, characterized by extensive interfingenng is mapped beneath the northernpart of the Site, making identification of the Tonoloway Wills Creek contact difficult Thebedrock layers in the vicinity of the Site strike approximately N80°E and dip to thenorthwest at an angle of about 25 degrees Bedrock underlying the Site is moderatelyfractured, with fracture frequency diminishing with depth These fractures are generallyoriented parallel to bedding planes and dip to the northwest
Ground water at the Site is present in the glacial overburden and the bedrock In theoverburden, ground water occurs within discontinuous gravel lenses within the till and adistinct layer of weathered bedrock at the base of the overburden, however thispredominantly clay unit is generally not very permeable Ground water in the overburdenat the Site is typically encountered at a depth of about 7 to 8 feet below grade Groundwater in the bedrock is present primarily in fractures or bedding planes Most of thesewater-bearing fractures are in the shallow bedrock (upper 30 to 40 feet below grade)Ground water at the Site generally flows from west to east, towards Mauses Creek
There are two small wetland areas located on the MW Manufacturing property One isnear the south fence line and other one is near the north fence line On the east side,towards Mauses Creek, larger discrete wetland areas are located outside the MWManufacturing property
Land and Resource Use
The Site is situated in a relatively rural area northwest of Danville, except for nearbycommercial development at the intersection of Old Valley School Road and Route 54,approximately V2 mile south of Interstate 80 There are a number of commercialproperties (several motels, a gas station, and several restaurants) located near theintersection of Routes 54 and 1-80, as well as a few private residences The Pennsylvania
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 6 of 23
![Page 16: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Department of Transportation (PennDOT) maintains a maintenance and storage areaimmediately north of the Site and a cement plant is located northwest of the Site TheSite is bordered on the west and south by farmlands and wooded lots Approximately V*mile southeast of the Site is the Village of Mausdale, a residential area comprised ofabout 24 homes
History of Contamination
MW Manufacturing engaged in secondary copper recovery from scrap wire, using bothmechanical and chemical processes, until it ceased operations in the early 1970 s In1972, MW Manufacturing filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United StatesBankruptcy Code, and Philadelphia National Bank acquired the property The Site iscurrently inactive, partly due to legal actions by PADEP (formerly known as thePennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources) PADEP records indicate thatMr Allan Levin of Doylestown, Pennsylvania, proprietor of MW Manufacturing, ownedthe property from about 1966 to 1972
The chemical recovery process reportedly employed the use of a hot vegetable oil bath tomelt the polyvmyl chloride (PVC) plastic insulation away from the scrap copper wireChlorinated solvents such as tetrachloroethene (PCE) were then used to remove theresidual oil from the separated copper The mechanical recovery process consisted of theshredding of wire and the generation of 'Fluff waste The Fluff waste consisted offibrous insulation material mixed with bits of plastic and copper
Warehouse 81 Inc acquired the Site in 1976 Subsequently, Warehouse 81 Inc andDomino Salvage, Inc formed a limited partnership to recover wire at the Site Recordsindicate that the only activities conducted by the Warehouse 81/Domino Salvagepartnership were mechanical recovery operations
The Main Plant Building (demolished in March/April 2004) at the Site consisted of asingle large building which occupied approximately one acre of the property The MamPlant Building concrete floor and foundation remain A smaller Storage Building (ButlerBuilding), which occupies approximately 3,350 square feet to the south of the Main PlantBuilding, has been modified for use as a temporary chemical and material storagebuilding as part of the OU-3 remedy The remainder of the Site, prior to implementationof the OU-3 and OU-5 remedies, consisted of open land, piles of Fluff and a smallsurface water impoundment Currently, the mam portion of the Site is fenced and accessto the Site is restricted A Site Plan showing current conditions at the Site is provided inFigure 2
Initial Response
Investigations of environmental conditions at the Site began in the early 1980s In 1981-1982, PADEP inspected the Site, installed four monitoring wells, and collected groundwater samples, in late 1982, Warehouse 81 retained Dunn Geoscience Corporation(Dunn) to evaluate conditions at the Site Dunn installed additional ground water
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 7 of 23
![Page 17: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
momtonng wells and sampled soils and ground water as part of this preliminaryinvestigation
The Site was proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL) on October 1, 1984 and wasplaced on the NPL on June 10, 1986 In February 1987, a Removal Consent Order wassigned by the EPA and the current owners of the Site Michael G Sabia and Michael GSabia, Jr doing business as Warehouse 81 Limited Partnership were directed to supplywater to a person living on-site and to keep records of the water supply for 5 years
Basis for Taking Action
Former disposal practices contaminated the on-site and off-site ground water surfacewater, soil and sediments with volatile organic compounds 32,000 cubic yards of Fluffcontaining lead and Bis(2 ethylhexyl) Phthalates generated during the dry recoveryprocess were left at the Site
IV Remedial Actions
A PRP search was conducted for the Site As a result of this search, EPA determined thatthe previous owners and operators of the Site had gone out of business EPA notifiedcurrent owners of the Site, Michael G Sabia and Michael G Sabia, Jr, doing business asWarehouse 81 Limited Partnership, of their potential liability at the Site and offered themthe opportunity to conduct the RI/FS, but they elected not to participate EPA conductedthe RI/FS beginning in August 1988 Following the completion of the RI/FS EPAdivided response actions at the Site into six Operable Units (OUs) OU-1 addresses thecarbon waste that has been left on-site from the copper recovery process In March 1989,EPA issued a ROD which selected off-site incineration for the carbon waste as theremedy for OU 1 A Special Notice Letter to conduct the RD/RA for OU-1 was sent toWarehouse 81 on March 6, 1989 Again, Warehouse 81 declined to participate Theexcavation and off-site incineration of the carbon waste was completed by EPA in March1992
Additional PRP investigations in 1992 discovered records that led to identification ofNassau and PP&L as additional PRPs A general notice letter regarding their Potentialliability for the Site was sent to Nassau and PP&L on May 19,1992
EPA issued the ROD for OU-2 in June 1990 This ROD addressed the Fluff, impactedsoils and impacted lagoon water at the Site In December 1992, Nassau petitioned EPAto reopen the OU-2 ROD EPA reopened the public comment period in October 1993and Nassau submitted comments to supplement their petition to reopen the ROD InMarch 1994, EPA agreed to consider alternatives proposed by Nassau provided thatNassau conduct a treatabihty study and a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) to re-evaluatethe remedial alternatives Between 1993-1995, Nassau undertook a series of studies toevaluate an alternate remedy for the Site During this period, EPA continued to pursuethe Remedial Design (RD) of the OU-2 remedy During the RD for OU-2 a series oftreatabihty studies involving incineration of Fluff and contaminated soils were
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 8 of 23
![Page 18: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
conducted The treatabihty studies, which were completed in November 1995 revealedthat the selected remedy for OU-2 had the potential for adverse impacts on human healthand environment Ultimately, EPA abandoned the OU 2 remedy involving incinerationand instead selected the OU-5 remedy involving stabilization and solidification of Fluffand contaminated soils, a remediation technology similar to that proposed by NassauThus, the OU 5 remedy addresses the Site contaminants previously addressed under OU-2
On June 30, 1992, EPA issued the ROD for OU-3, which addresses ground watercontamination On September 30, 1992, EPA sent Special Notice Letters to NassauPP&L and Warehouse 81 and its general partner, Michael G Sabia Sr which informedthose PRPs that the EPA was willing to, enter into a federal consent decree to conduct theRD/RA contemplated by the OU-3 ROD Warehouse 81 and Michael G Sabia Sr didnot respond to the Special Notice letter On March 31, 1993, a Unilateral AdministrativeOrder was issued to each PRP to conduct the RD/RA for OU-3 Nassau and PP&Lagreed to conduct the RD/RA for OU-3
The remaining discussions of Remedy Selection, Remedy Implementation and SystemOperation and Maintenance are organized by Operable Units
OU-1 - Carbon Waste Pile
Remedy Selection - EPA s selected remedy for OU-1 - Carbon Waste Pile consisted ofcompleting the following tasks
1 Excavation and off-site incineration of on-site carbon waste pile2 Removal and off site incineration of PCB contaminated waste
Remedy Implementation The remedy, successfully completed on March 13 1992,involved consolidation, loading, and off site transportation and incineration of the carbonwaste pile (approximately 875 cubic yards) and approximately 800 drums of PCBcontaminated waste ,
System Operation and Maintenance The EPA issued a Remedial Action CompletionReport (RACR) on September 30, 1992, which stated that No Further Action (NFA) isrequired under OU-1 Therefore, the OU-1 remedy does not involve ongoing treatmentsystems or maintenance operations
OU-2 - Fluff Waste and Site Soils (replaced by OU-5 in 1995)
EPA conducted a series of treatabihty studies which revealed that the selected remedy forOU-2 had the potential for adverse impacts on human health and environment Therefore,EPA abandoned the OU-2 remedy involving incineration and instead selected the OU-5remedy involving stabilization and solidification of Fluff and contaminated soils, aremediation technology similar to that proposed by Nassau
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 9 of 23
![Page 19: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
OU-3 - Ground Water
Remedy Selection - From 1996 to 1998, a series of Pre Design Investigation activitieswere conducted for OU-3 by Nassau The principal objectives of the OU-3 Pre DesignInvestigation activities were to
1 Acquire additional ground water quality and water level data at the Site and from thesurrounding areas to fill data gaps regarding the extent of ground water impacts andthe direction of ground water flow
2 Further assess the hydrogeologic setting which influences ground water conditions at,and adjacent to, the Site
3 Evaluate the anticipated ground watej treatment efficiencies through bench-scaletreatabihty studies
Based on the conclusions from the Pre Design Investigations as subsequentlydocumented in the December 2001 Pre-Design Investigation Report (O Bnen & Gere)an updated conceptual model of the Site conditions was developed This updatedConceptual Site Model (CSM) indicated the following
1 The primary environmental impacts at the Site result from volatile organiccompounds (VOCs) present within ground water in the overburden and shallowbedrock beneath and east of the Site
2 The highest degree of contamination is found in the overburden and shallow bedrockzones
3 Ground water flow in the overburden generally has a downward component towardsthe more conductive shallow bedrock zone, and an upward component from deeperbedrock towards the shallow bedrock zone
4 The hydrogeologic setting effectively contains the impacted ground water to adefined area The containment of impacted ground water is a function of topographicfeatures, the orientation of the bedrock strike, dipping beds, hydraulic gradients(including upward vertical flow within the bedrock and the discharge of ground waterto the creek system) The ground water hydraulic gradient indicates that MausesCreek is functioning as a discharge barrier to ground water flow
5 Migration of contamination has been further reduced by the installation of a publicwater supply in 1996 which effectively eliminated known ground water withdrawalfor potable use in the vicinity of the plume
6 Concentrations of VOCs in ground water are expected to slowly decrease in futureyears as a function of ground water remediation in conjunction with naturalattenuation, including degradation and dilution within the aquifer, and volatilizationin the surface water environment
EPA issued an BSD dated September 27, 2000 to explain the different approach forground water cleanup The major differences to OU-3 remedial objectives, as explainedby the September 2000 ESD, are summarized below
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 10 of 23
![Page 20: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
1 On-site extraction of impacted ground water from the VOC plume at the Siteutilizing an overburden interceptor trench in addition to vertical bedrock extractionwells in the source area The original OU 3 ROD called for ground water extractionusing only vertical extraction wells
2 Ground water cleanup levels were changed from background to MaximumContaminant Levels (MCLs) promulgated as the EPA drinking water standards orMedium Specific Concentrations (MSCs) set forth in the Pennsylvania LandRecycling and Environmental Remediation Standards Act (Act 2), whichever is morestringent
Based on the preliminary modeling conducted in 1999, the September 2000 ESDconceptual remedial design utilized an overburden interceptor trench with additionalground water extraction from bedrock wells, where beneficial The ESD alsodocumented that more refined ground water modeling (during remedial design) would beconducted to evaluate the ability of trench design to meet the remedial objectivesTherefore, consistent with the ESD, the ground water flow model was refined during thePreliminary (30%) RD based on the 2001 Preliminary Design Investigation (PDI)activities The refined ground water model incorporated additional Site data such aswetland topography, depth to bedrock, hydraulic parameters, and evaluated alternativeground water extraction options in addition to the overburden interceptor trench
As detailed in the December 2001 30% RD Report, based on the CSM, it was decidedthat the OU-3 remedy would move forward utilizing shallow bedrock extraction wells toimplement on-site hydraulic control of overburden and bedrock ground water with thehighest VOC concentrations This represented a modification to the remedial design,while maintaining consistency with the OU-3 ROD/ESD RA objectives The rationalefor this modification is summarized as follows
• Under natural conditions, a downward hydraulic gradient exists from the overburdento the shallow bedrock Therefore, the natural flow conditions will be enhanced byshallow bedrock extraction to capture overburden ground water Shallow bedrockextraction can be designed to provide the same measure of overburden hydrauliccontrol as the overburden extraction scenarios evaluated
• With any practical on-site ground water extraction scheme the majority of water isextracted through the shallow bedrock zone Vertical extraction wells are the mostpractical and economical means to extract bedrock ground water Also, the flexibilityof the vertical well ground water extraction system, in terms of extraction locations,and adjustment to these locations, is greatly improved compared to a horizontal wellor trench system
• The updated CSM indicates that ground water from the shallow bedrock zonerepresents the greatest contribution to discharge and VOC mass flux to MausesCreek By performing extraction from the shallow bedrock zone, the reduction inVOC migration loading can be optimized
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 11 of 23
![Page 21: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Remedy Implementation
The OU-3 Pre-Fmal (90%) RD Report was divided into two, to facilitate the fast trackturnkey design/build construction of the OU-5 CWTS/OU 3 GWTS Accordingly thePre-Fmal (90%) GWTS Design, providing the detailed design of the OU 5 CWTS/OU-3GWTS and relevant hydrogeologic aspects of the remedy, was completed in December2003 This allowed the OU-5 GWTS/OU-3 GWTS turnkey construction as previouslydescribed, to take place The second part of the OU-3 90% RD Addendum Report, wascompleted on July 30, 2004 and provided the remaining required supporting detailedhydrogeologic information and performance assessment criteria as part of the overallOU-3 90% Remedial Design Thus the 100% Final RD was completed on July 30 2004
iDunng December 2004 and early January 2005, the OU-5 CWTS was cleaned andchanged in service to that of the longer-term OU-3 ground water treatment system TheOU-5 CWTS is largely identical to the OU-3 GWTS, except two additional watertreatment unit processes not required for the OU-3 GWTS (chemical enhancedprecipitation and granular activated carbon adsorption) were provided for treatment ofOU-5 generated construction waters that were removed A PFD of the OU-3 GWTS isprovided as Figure 3 These two unit operations were bypassed during the retrofitSpecifically, the final OU-3 GWTS consists of the following unit processes
• Flow Equalization• Bag and Cartridge Filtration• pH Adjustment and/or sequestenng agent addition• Ultraviolet/Chemical enhanced (with hydrogen peroxide) oxidation (UV/Chemox)• Counter Current Air Stripping• Final pH adjustment• Solids Conditioning• Solids dewatenng with a plate and frame filter press until processing with the filter
press is no longer needed
As detailed in the OU-3 Final Design, ground water .extraction is being implemented withfive ground water collection/recovery wells shallow bedrock wells Dunn 8 and EX-1,and overburden/weathered bedrock wells OEX-1, OEX-3 and OEX 4
In December 2004, an NPDES Equivalency Permit for the OU-3 treatment system treateddischarge was issued by PADEP As of the May 26, 2005 5-Year Review Inspection inexcess of 3 8 million gallons of ground water were collected, treated, and discharged toMauses Creek in compliance with the OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit
Startup and operation of the OU-3 recovery wells and GWTS commenced on January 17,2005 and will continue to operate as planned Current set pumping rates from the groundwater collection/recovery wells are as follows
Dunn-8 15 gpm OEX 1 1 5 gpm OEX-4 1 5 gpmEX 1 10 gpm OEX 3 1 5 gpm
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 12 of 23
![Page 22: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
To date, it has been observed that Dunn 8 EX 1 and OEX-3 pumps typically operatecontinuously, whereas the pumps for OEX 1 and OEX-4 typically operate cyclically dueto evacuation and recharge of these two wells (both set at their minimum pumpwithdrawal rates)
On February 17, 2005 EPA, PADEP, Nassau and O Bnen & Gere performed a joint start-up and pre certification inspection It was determined by all parties that the OU 3treatment system was functional, operational and performing as designed
System Operation and Maintenance (Q&M) Subsequent to commencement of full scaleOU-3 ground water collection and treatment system operations on January 17 2005 theOU-3 remedy moved from a completed, RA phase into a long term O&M phase TheO&M manual for the OU-3 GWTS has been prepared which identifies routine operationand maintenance tasks that must be performed to continue efficient operation of the OU 3ground water collection and treatment system This includes equipment maintenance,data logging and routine and non-routine tasks associated with operation andmaintenance of a system of this nature The OU-3 GWTS O&M manual was reviewedby EPA during the February 17, 2005 joint start-up and pre certification inspection It ismaintained on-site and is continually being updated as found necessary based oncontinuation of on-going operations
The treatment system effluent is sampled twice per month as required by PADEP for theparameters specified in the OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit Discharge MonitoringReports are submitted to EPA and PADEP on a monthly basis
Intra-process sampling is also being conducted in order to further optimize unit processefficiencies and, as necessary, to be used in development of Best Available Technology(BAT) discharge limitations with PADEP near the end of the first operating year
Effectiveness of the treatment system operations under the OU-3 NPDES EquivalencyPermit has been clearly demonstrated Treated discharge samples collected on January24, 2005 (and twice per month since) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds(VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), total and dissolved metalspolychlormated biphenyls (PCBs), total suspended solids (TSS), and pH These results,and daily average flow, have all been well within the discharge limits specified byPADEP in the NPDES OU-3 Equivalency Permit
Long-term OU-3 Performance Monitoring activities will be conducted pursuant to theJuly 2004 Final (100%) RD which includes the OU-3 Performance Evaluation Plan(PEP), while the long-term OU-3 GWTS O&M activities will be completed pursuant tothe Final (100%) RD and Site O&M Manual
OU-4 - Public Water Supply
Remedy Selection EPA's selected remedy for OU-4 public water supply consisted of thedesign and installation of a public water supply for certain residences and businesses
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 13 of 23
![Page 23: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Remedy Implementation Construction of a 17,400 ft water transmission mam throughoutValley Township was completed in 1996 providing water to 39 residences and 133commercial establishments
System Operation and Maintenance The public water supply system is operating asdesigned providing safe dnnking water to the residences and commercial establishmentsThe O&M of the public water system has been taken over by the Valley Township WaterAuthority and it is being operated in compliance with the Commonwealth ofPennsylvania Dnnking Water Regulations
OU-5 - Fluff Waste, Storage Tanks, Lagoon Water/Sediments and Site Soils
Remedy Selection For OU-5, Nassau conducted a Focused Feasibility Study andtreatability study from 1993-1995 to demonstrate the viability of other remedies EPAreviewed this work and issued a ROD on December 22, 1997, revising the 1990 decisiondocument This new ROD called for the ex situ (removed from the ground) stabilizationof the Fluff, lagoon sediment and surface soils and the backfilling of the excavated areaswith the stabilized material The remedy called for stabilized areas to be graded in amanner to prevent ponding and promote drainage of precipitation away from and off ofthe stabilized mass The OU-5 ROD calls for the stabilized material to be covered withtwo feet of clean soil, comprised of an 18-inch thick vegetative support layer and sixinches of topsoil The topsoil will be seeded, with the resulting vegetation being used toanchor and prevent erosion of the surficial soils The final OU-5 remedy provides forunsaturated soils contaminated with Non-Aqueous-Phase Liquid (NAPL) to beexcavated, characterized and disposed of off-site at a permitted facility AdditionallyOU-5 provides for tank and drum contents and other debns remaining at the Site to betransported off-site to appropriate facilities Implementation/enforcement of ICsincluding, but not limited to deed restrictions (institutional controls to prohibitinterference with the remedial actions and to prevent exposure to soil and ground watercontamination) and fencing, as well as continued monitoring and implementation of along-term OU-5 O&M program, will provide, for Site security and long termprotectiveness During the initial remedial activities, it was observed that the soils underthe fluff pile were very clayey and did not seem to be impacted by fluff In September2004, EPA issued ESD#1 to modify the requirement of excavating 2 feet of soil under theFluff pile and mixing with the stabilization mass The change required excavating onlythe soils where core samples of the soils underneath Fluff indicated presence of fluff
Remedy Implementation The Final (100%) RD for OU-5 was completed in October2003 Construction of a new water treatment building was initiated in November 2003and substantially completed in January 2004 Construction of the OU-5 CWTS, beinghoused in the new water treatment building, was initiated in February 2004 and wascompleted with system commissioning and startup in May 2004 Construction of thebuned treated discharge line, running from the treatment plant to Mauses Creek, was alsoaccomplished during this construction period Installation of a chemical bulk storage area
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 14 of 23
![Page 24: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
in the existing Storage Building (Butler Building) to support the OU 5 CWTS/OU 3GWTS was completed in June 2004
The OU-5 CWTS was built, in part, to provide for the treatment of construction waterderived during implementation of the OU-5 RA Construction waters treated includedpotentially impacted storm water as well as waters collected from performance of OU 5RA from de-watering and decontamination activities A PFD of the OU 5 CWTS isprovided as Figure 3
The OU-5 RA Contractor (Weston Solutions, Inc) was awarded the RA contract inFebruary 2004 for performing the remediation of the Fluff, soil, sediment and remainingdebns associated with the OU-5 remedy The OU-5 RA Contractor mobilized to the Sitein May 2004 and substantially completed construction (except final grading, topsoil andseeding) of the OU-5 RA activities by the time of winter shutdown in December 2004Upon re-mobilization in the spring of 2005, remaining OU-5 RA activities werecompleted These activities consisted of performing final grading, installing a six-inchlayer of topsoil over the already installed 18-inch thick vegetative support layer (VSL)seeding, and transition from temporary to final erosion and sediment control measuresonce the vegetative cover was established
The OU-5 CWTS was utilized to treat OU-5 derived construction waters from June untilDecember 2004 During that time, approximately 2,252,848 gallons of treated water wastreated and discharged to Mauses Creek under an NPDES equivalency permit issued byPADEP for the OU-5 CWTS No violations of the NPDES equivalency permitconditions occurred dunng the OU 5 CWTS operational period
System Operation and Maintenance The OU-5 O&M basically consists of ongoing,periodic inspections for E&S controls and to confirm growth in the vegetative cover inthe short term, and inspections/repairs as needed to maintain the soil cover/site controlsand inspections to observe for animals burrowing/holes per the OU-5 O&M Plan for thelong-term maintenance
OU-6 - Building Demolition and Debris Removal
Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Main Plant Building andremoval of debns was done under a removal CD with current Site property owners
Demolition of unsafe portions of the western third of the Mam Plant Building by thecurrent Site property owners was conducted in the fall of 2000 In April 2004, theproperty owners razed the remainder of the Main Plant Building and disposed of thedemolition debns off-site due to safety concerns for RA contractor workers
V Progress Since Last Five-Year Review
Dunng the previous Five-Year Review performed in July 2000, the remedies for OU-2and OU-4 were found to be protective of human health and the environment It also
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 15 of 23
![Page 25: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
concluded that remedies for OU-3, OU-5 and OU 6 were expected to be protective ofhuman health and the environment upon their completion The remedy for OU 3 longterm groundwater extraction and treatment, was expected to last for several years Theexposure pathways to groundwater have been eliminated (i e connecting residences topublic water) or will be monitored throughout the OU-3 O&M phase Since the previousFive-Year Review, the remedial designs and remedial actions for OU-3 OU-5 and OU 6have been completed as required The remedy for OU-3 ground water extraction andtreatment system has been operating and maintained as designed since January 17 2005The final remedial action construction phase for OU-5 was just completed in June 2005with the vegetative cover now growing in as part of the longer-term OU-5 O&M phaseThe OU-6 building demolition and off-site debns disposal work was completed in 2004
/Confirmatory sampling/inspections for OU-3 and OU-5 will continue to be conductedaccording to approved plans to document that ROD objectives are met Specifically
• OU-3 Performance monitoring data evaluation and reporting will continue as plannedand provided for in the OU-3 Performance Evaluation Parameters (PEP) included inthe OU-3 Final (100%) Design
• OU-3 GWTS O&M sampling and inspections will continue as planned and providedfor in the OU-3 GWTS O&M Plan and OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit
• OU-5 ongoing inspections and maintenance/repairs will be conducted as planned andprovided for in the OU-5 O&M Plan
VI Five-Year Review Process
Administrative Components
The MW Manufacturing Five-Year Review team was led by Bhupi Khona of EPA RPMfor the MW Manufacturing Superfund Site, and included John Angevine, PADEP ProjectManager and EPA Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC) William Hudson
Community Involvement
An advertisement appeared on May 29 2005 in The Danville News and Press Enterpriselocal newspapers The advertisement explained the Five-Year Review process providedpoint of contact information, and identified the location of the information repositoriesfor the Site No feedback from the community was received as a result of theadvertisement
Document Review
The Five-Year Review consisted of a review of relevant documents including but notlimited to, RODs/ESDs, ARARs and the following reports prepared by O'Brien & Gere
• OU-3 Final (100%) Design, including Performance Evaluation Plan and O&M Plancomponents
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 16 of 23
![Page 26: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• OU-3 RA - Certification of Construction Phase Completion Report• OU-3 Interim Remedial Action Report• OU-5 Final (100%) Design, including O&M Plan
Data Review
This Five-Year Data Review is for OU 3 (ground water) and OU- 5 (Fluff Waste StorageTanks, Lagoon Water/Sediments and Site Soils) remedies
OU-3 Data Review
The following ground water data review summary is based on the 2004 ground watersampling and hydraulic data included in the OU-3 (Ground Water) Baseline MonitoringReport completed by O Bnen & Gere dated May 27 2005
Geological Conditions Relative to the Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
Site geological conditions were confirmed by baseline observations which furtherconfirmed that the WBZ, which consist of the lower and more permeable part of theoverburden zone, and the shallow bedrock zone are the primary aquifers associated withVOC transport The CSM was also confirmed, including the important geologic controlson ground water movement and VOC migration
Ground Water Flow Directions
Baseline ground water elevations and flow directions were consistent with previousstudies The ground water flow in the WBZ and bedrock aquifer is affected by theamsotropy and directional conductivity of the bedrock, and the data confirm thedemonstrable hydraulic connection between the WBZ and shallow bedrock The data alsoconfirm the discharge of ground water in Site aquifers to Mauses Creek
Ground water contour maps for two rounds of oveiburden ground water gauging eventsin September 2004 and December 2004 are included as Figures 4 and 5, respectivelyGround water contour maps have been included for two rounds of shallow bedrockground water gauging events in September 2004 and December 2004, as Figures 6 and 7respectively
Ground Water Discharge to Wetlands
Baseline data indicate that ground water was not discharging to the wetlands during themeasurement events As previously noted, ponded water and saturated surface soilobserved in most of the wetland areas east of the Site is likely the result of precipitationand surface runoff and not the result of a significant ground water discharge Only at theNP-3/SW-5 monitoring location and along Mauses Creek are shallow bedrock groundwater elevations higher than overburden ground water elevations
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 17 of 23
![Page 27: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
VOC Concentrations in Ground Water
Concentrations of PCE, the parent VOC, and tnchloroethene (TCE) are highest in theoverburden and shallow bedrock ground water near the locations of the former processarea at the Site and a former PCE storage tank
Elevated concentrations of PCE, TCE and cis-1 2 dichloroethene (cis-1 2-DCE) extend mthe downgradient direction towards Mauses Creek PCE degradation products vinylchloride (VC), ethene and ethane are present and extend in the downgradient directionThe individual VOC plumes are centered along a primary plume axis orientedapproximately west to east
A summary of VOC concentrations in ground water samples from the 2004 baselinesampling events has been included in the attachment A Sample results for VOCconcentrations in ground water utilizing passive diffusion bags have been included onTable 2 Natural attenuation indicator parameters in ground water have been summarizedon Table 3
Evaluation of field parameter and VOC data indicated that reductive dechlonnation ofPCE and its degradation products (TCE, cis-1 2 DCE, and VC) is occurring in Siteground water at a significant rate under natural biological conditions based on themeasured redox conditions and elevated concentrations of cis-1,2-DCE, VC andethene/ethane in ground water
The estimated mass flux of VOCs to Mauses Creek based on VOC concentrations andthe estimated ground water baseflow within the plume area, is approximately 405grams/day under baseline conditions This baseline estimated VOC load to the MausesCreek will be used along with other parameters to assess the performance of the groundwater cleanup remedy
Surface Water Flow
Flow measurements in Mauses Creek collected during the baseline period indicate thatstream flow typically increases from upstream to downstream, potentially due to thedischarge of Site ground water to Mauses Creek, as predicted by the CSM Compared tostream flow, the estimated volume of flow attributable to Site ground water discharge is asmall percentage of the total stream flow A summary of Mauses Creek stream flowmeasurements collected since January 2002 has been included as Table 4
Surface Water Quality
Site-related VOCs were detected in surface water samples taken during January 2005,with total concentrations within the range previously detected in 2002 The fivespecifically-targeted metals (cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and silver) and PCB analysisrequested by the EPA's Biological Technical Assistance Group (BTAG) forevaluation/updating of the OU-3 NPDES Equivalency Permit were not detected in any of
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 18 of 23
![Page 28: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
the stream samples, with the exception of copper in the fUrtherest downstream samples
A summary of surface water analytical results for VOCs has been included as Table 5 Asummary of surface water analytical results for SVOCs and PCBs has been included asTable 6 A summary of surface water analytical results for metals phosphorus and TSShas been included as Table 7
The surface water sample collected from the wetland area (SW-5) in September 2004contained elevated concentrations of Site-related VOCs The detected concentrationswere comparable with previous results and suggest ground water discharge at thislocation at the time of sampling However these VOCs were not detected above thereporting limit m the December 2004 sample, suggesting that ground water discharge tothis area is not continuous and/or that there is a significant flow contribution from surfacerunoff
Wetlands Delineation (off-site wetlands)
During the design, EPA Biological Technical Assistance Group (STAG) expressedconcerns about potential hydraulic effects on near by off-site wetlands due to groundwater extraction and recommended monitoring of off-site wetlands Therefore, wetlanddelineation was performed to assess the base line conditions before the start of the groundwater treatment system, the data collected would be used for the future reference Duringthe wetland transect location work in July 2004, which was attended by a representativeof the BTAG, Kathleen A Patnode, it appeared that the original (1992) wetlanddelineation may have included areas that did not exhibit wetland characteristics, such ashydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology The wetland area was re delineated Thewetland delineation was performed on September 28 and 29, 2004 to identify the extentof wetlands east of the Site, in accordance with the U S Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE) 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987) One of the wetland monitoringtransects (WT2) was also extended by an O'Bnen & Gere wetlands biologist in an areaselected by the BTAG The newly established wetlands monitoring transects anddelineation boundanes were surveyed on November 17 to 18, 2004 by a Pennsylvania-licensed surveyor (Lippincort & Jacobs Engineers, Riverside, NJ)
OU-5 Data Review
The following remedial actions have been completed for OU-5 (Fluff Waste StorageTanks, Lagoon Water/Sediments and Site Soils)
• Approximately 2,252,848 gallons of water was treated and discharged to MausesCreek under an NPDES equivalency permit issued by PADEP for the OU-5 CWTSNo violations of the NPDES equivalency permit conditions occurred during the OU-5CWTS operational period
• The excavation, stabilization and on-site placement of approximately 35,566 cubicyards of lagoon sediments and Fluff matenal
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 19 of 23
![Page 29: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• Off-site transportation and disposal of impacted materials (including approximately1,243 tons of hazardous soil/sediment containing NAPL) as an alternative to on sitelow temperature thermal disorption (LTTD) treatment
• Removal and off-site disposal of both above ground and below ground tanks anddrums, metal scrap and other miscellaneous debns encountered on the Site(approximately 18 tons of non hazardous scrap metal from the above ground andbelow ground tanks, and approximately 159 tons of non-hazardous debns)
• Removal of approximately 35,168 gallons of hazardous liquid associated with theabove ground and below ground tanks
• Removal of approximately 21,000 pounds of hazardous liquid associated with theNAPL removal activities
• Installed a soil cover system over approximately 9 acres of the Site (including placedstabilized material) The soil cover consisted of the following per the OU 5 FinalDesign
6-mchesoftopsoil18-mchesofVSL
• Ground water monitoring well abandonment and extension and ground watermonitoring well installation in conformance with the OU-3 remedy requirements
• Construction water collection, controls and management• Air monitoring (work zone and perimeter)• Fence repair/replacement• Completed wetland replacement of approximately 3,200 square feet of wetlands
vegetation disturbed during soil cover construction
The testing/performance data, as built survey drawings, waste disposal/manifest recordsand other required information for the OU-5 remedy will be included in the OU-5Certification of Construction Completion Report due in August/September 2005 Thesedata along with the OU-3 Performance Assessment data collected going forward will beaddressed with the next 5-Year Review
l
Site Inspection
On May 26, 2005, a combined 5-Year Review and OU-5 Pre-Certification Inspection washeld at the Site In attendance were Bhupi Khona (EPA RPM), John Angevme (PADEPProject Manager), G John Galasso (Nassau Metals Project Coordinator), JayMotwam/Dave Lis of Weston (OU-5 RA Contractor) and Tom Komar/Tom Nowlan ofO'Brien & Gere (Resident Engineer/Supervising Contractor) Additionally the OU-3GWTS operator, Jerry Superko of O'Brien & Gere, was also present for interviewing andquestions as needed During the inspection, the following items were covered
• A detailed tour/inspection of the OU-3 GWTS was conducted similar to the February17, 2005 OU-3 Pre-Certification Inspection Completion of the February 17, 2005OU-3 GWTS punchhst items was confirmed pursuant to the March 17, 2005Certification of Construction Completion Report All OU-3 GWTS NPDES effluent
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 20 of 23
![Page 30: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
sampling data, mtra-process sampling data and GWTS operation records werereviewed and confirmed proper functioning of the treatment system as designedOther OU-3 documents requested and inspected included but were not limited to thedaily O&M inspection report O&M Manual (including OU-3 NPDES EquivalencyPermit), Site Health and Safety Plan, J Superko s operator license for Pennsylvania(although not a requirement), and Occupation Safety and Health Administration(OSHA) training records The monitoring wells were inspected and were protectedwith locks and steel guard posts as needed
• For OU-5, a detailed walkover of the Site was conducted including, but not limited tothe overall site/access controls, the completed soil cover on-site wetlandarea/plantings, fencelme/penmeter, final E&S controls drainage swales etcRelevant documentation (water disposal records stabilization results air monitoringresults, etc ) from the OU-5 remedy were reviewed, and will be included in the OU 5Certification of Construction Completion Report due in August/September 2005 withfinal as-built drawings
• The former Main Plant Building Area was also inspected to confirm the finalcompletion of the OU-6 remedy including off-site disposal of demolition debns
• On May 27, 2005, RPM Bhupi Khona and O Bnen & Gere resident engineer ThomasKomar P E visited Montour County record deed office to confirm inclusion of theCD with the current site owner of the MW Manufacturing property s deed recordThe CD was placed in the deed record as required by the CD EPA requested the deedrecorder reference the CD in the marginal notation for the property so it can be foundeasily during the title search The recorder agreed
Interviews
On May 26, 2005, a public availability session was conducted from 4pm to 6pm Alocal cable television network CCN News 8 came to the session and asked generalquestions A representative from the Susquehanna Valley Chamber of Commerce andMontour County commissioner, Mr Harold H Hurst, attended the session Most of thequestions were directed towards reuse of the Site
l
Comments in general stated that the Site was not of concern to those interviewed Keeninterest was shown for the reuse of the Site
VII Technical Assessment
Question A Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents7
Yes As explained in detail, the remedies were constructed and are now functioning asdesigned and as intended by the RODs
Question B Are the exposure assumptions, toxicitv data, cleanup levels, and RemedialAction Obiectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy still valid7
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 21 of 23
![Page 31: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The exposure assumptions used to develop the Human Health Risk Assessment includedboth current and potential future exposures These assumptions are considered to beconservative and reasonable in evaluating risk Calculating nsk based on the current RiskAssessment Guidance might make changes in nsk numbers and thus might affect nskbased cleanup levels However, the changes would have little impact on the selection ofthe appropnate remedial action already completed since the entire contaminated site soilswere either excavated and disposed off site (carbon waste pile and NAPL impacted soil)or excavated/stabilized with Fluff and placed back under a soil cover
For OU-3 the RA construction was completed and extraction/treatment system initiatedin January 2005 This remedy will be evaluated pursuant to the OU 3 FinalDesign/Performance Evaluation Plan and further assessed in the next 5 Year Reviewbased on performance data collected
The potential for the vapor intrusion pathway was evaluated and is not consideredcomplete since there is no residential housing within the Site or impacted ground waterplume area Restrictions on the future use of the property will prohibit these potentialfuture exposure pathways
ICs are in place, a local ordinance prohibits potable use of groundwater, the CD is filed atthe county record deed office and references to the CD are contained in the marginalnotation for the property
Question C Has any other information come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy9
No
VIII Issues
Issues
Potential for Vapor Intrusion (VI) pathway for Off-site Residential Housing/Other Use
AffectsCurrent
Protectiveness(Y/N)
N
Affects FutureProtectiveness
(Y/N)
Y
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 22 of 23
![Page 32: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
IX Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions
Potentialfor VI
pathway forOff Site
ResidentialHousing/Other Use
Recommendations andFollow-up Actions
Implement ZoningRestrictions
PartyResponsible
ValleyTownship
/
OversightAgency
EPA
MilestoneDate
July 2006
AffectsProtectiveness
(Y/N)
Current Future
N Y
X Protectiveness Statement
The Site has been determined to be protective of human health and the environment inthe short-term because remaining direct exposure pathways have been eliminated byremedial actions under OU-3, OU-5 and OU-6 The remedy is expected to be fullyprotective of human health and the environment upon attainment of OU 3 groundwatercleanup goals, which are expected to require at least 30 years to attain In the interimexposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are being controlled and ICsare preventing exposure to, or the mgestion of, contaminated ground water Placing theCD with the current property owner s deed record will provide notice of potential nsksand descnbe what would constitute unacceptable future use of the property All threats atthe Site have been addressed through treatment and off site disposal of highlycontaminated materials including carbon waste and NAPL-impacted soils,stabilization/backfill of Fluff/sediment/soils and cover of the area
Vapor intrusion is not a current issue since there is no residential housing on-site orwithin the ground water plume area Restrictions on the future use will prevent potentialfuture exposure pathways
Long-term protectiveness of the remedial action will be verified by the OU-5 O&MPlan/Site Controls and OU-3 O&M Plan/Performance Evaluation Plan until the groundwater cleanup goals are achieved
XI Next Review
Next Five-Year Review for the Site is required by July 2010, five years from the date ofthis review
MW Manufacturing Third Five Year Review Page 23 of 23
![Page 33: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ATTACHMENT A
![Page 34: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Siamr? of VOO • Gra_* WOK S^*fei
MW Muufacmruf Superfuad Sue Villey Towruaip
Analrtt
ienzeneBromodichlorornethaneBromoformBromomethane2 Buunone (MEK)Cartx>n disulfideCarbon tetrachlonde
ChlorobenzeneChi oroe thaneChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropanehbromoc hi ororoe thane
1 .2 Dibromoeihane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobeiuKWDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane
2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenec»- 1,2 Dichlotoethenetrans I 2 Dichloroetbene1,2 Dichloropropanecis-1 3 Dichloropropenetrans- 1.3 DKhlorocropeneEthylbenaneFreonll32 HexanoneIsoproDYlbenzeneMethyl AcetateMethyicycloteuncMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvi 2 DeDtanone(MIBK)Methytene chlondeSryrene1 l,2,2Tetr»chloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 ,1 ,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromeihaneVinyl chlondem,D-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethanefrW™/i/*»gfefHililliia1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran. tetrahydro-ketonesunknownTotal TICs
USiLPA UnnUfTWater MCL
or Rfak BaaedConcentration
58080
8519001000
51103680
190NA0280
0000756X10
ISO75
350800
57701005
044044
700590001500
NA61006300
26•>ooo41100
00555
10007020055
13002
NANA
10000NANA
ItaMMnfrfiSESNANANANANANANANA
Water MSC (Non-Reridcntial U*ed
Aouifer)
100005
808010
58004100
5100900803
NA0280
00560060075
100011057701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20
4105
100035
100070200
55
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANA
DCNN7
12/72/04
N 86941 3
< 2 3< 0 3 I< 0 1 I< 0 1 7<0 15<15<023< O I 5<023<073
<008I<Q 13<017< 1 1<018<047<0 19<0 18<029<062< O I 3<035<08I<024<017<0 11<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<016<028<059< 0 2
< O I 2<014<037<0 14<061<025<0 17<013<067<066<03«<017<017<00»<0075
10
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
DUNN-»
12/2004
N 867*6-6
<*6295< 2 2< 3 4< 3<50< 4 6<3 1< 4 6<15< 1 6<26< 3 5<22< 3 6< 9 3< 3 9< 3 6< S 8< 12<16< 6 997715200106
<12< 1 4< 16< 5 4<69<15<66 j<13< 3 2< 5 5<12<4 1<14<Z711700<18<12< 4 95225110< 133420< 7 3< 3 4< 3 4861485165
ND130 1NDNDNDNDND
130 J
DCVN»
0*15/04
N779H 5
< 110< 16< 5 S< 8 6< 7 4<130< U< 7 7< !<37<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<56<9<23< 9 7<9
< 14<31<65< 17<«08390
299 J< 5 4< 3 6< 4< 13< I 7<36< 17<3 l< 8 1< 14<30< 10<6
<684200< 7<30< 12502410
<3317S< 18< 8 6< 8 64 1033647
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
tX/NN«<!XJP\
0*1 VO4
NT79U 7
< 110< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 74< 130< 11< 7 7< 1<37<4 1< 6 «< 8 7<56<9<23< 9 7<9
< 14< 3 I<6-5<17<408420
«22 J< 5 4< 3 6< 4< 13< 17<3«< I 7<31<8 1< 14<30< 10<6
< 6 84110< 7<30< 12
49 •> J-380<33\76< ll<86< 8 6
•» 342025529
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
OCVN-*
IJ7MV>
N»7I64.
< 110< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4
< 130
7 7
< 1< }
i \t*&8 7
< V ><•>
< 23< 9 7< 9
< 14< 3 I< 6 5< 1 7
*«3 I9500
232 1< 5 4< 3 6< 4< 13< 17<J6< 17< 3 I<8 1< 14<30< 10< 6
< 6 85150< 7
<30< 12651• •o<33246< I 8< 8 6< 8 645404571 1
NDNDNDNDNDVD __,ND0
OCNN-ll
IJ73X)4
•O69U.I
< )< 0 3 I< 0 I I<0 17
0 U5
0 J0 15
<U 30 \
0 Ull
U 1)0 1
< 1 1< U I S< l ) 4
<0 19<0 18<0 N< 0 6 2<0 13<03J<0 t t<0^<0 17< 0 I I<0071<00t<o ~n< 0 3 5< 0 7 3< 0 3 3<0(>3<0 16<0 8<059< 0
<0 1<0 14429
<0 14< 0 6 I
0.5<0 1704« J<067<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056<0075
103
VDVDVDNDVDND0
NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not delected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not delectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region TO RBCj, April 2003 in italicsFreon 113 1 I ' tnchloro-l 2,2 mnuoroethane
Tibiel VOCal. Pigeladl
0 Bntn AC E f «**7/1 IMS
![Page 35: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
T hfel"••11117 of VOO m Cnod W i
MW Mmufacmnaf Supcrfund S K V»jfcy Towiuhip
AnaJyte
Pofatfte Orpmc CompoKurfr rwt>
tenzenefromodichJorofDethanefromoform
Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobeitteneChloroethaneChlorofonnChloromethaneCyclohexane! 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneJibromochlorotne thane1 2 DibrOmoethaae1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 DichlorobenzeneI 4-Dichloroben2eneDichlonxtafluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroetheneci$ 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1,2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis- 1.3 Dichloropropenetrans 1,3-DichloropropeneEthyl benzineFreon 1132 HexanoneIsopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetatevtethyicvclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2 oentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 1 2 2 TetrachloroethaoeTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2.4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1.1,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnc hlorofl uoromethaneVinyl chloridem.D-Xyleneo-XyieneXylene (toul)EthaneEthene
TtntatiTtfrrJnetitfVIUanJrrai1 Propene 2<bromo-alcoholscvcloalkane/ilkeneDimethyl suUideFuran tetrahydro-ketonesunknown
USEPADrkk^"Wilcr MCL
or Rfck Bated__Cgoejntr»tjoa —
58080
8519001000
i1103680
190NA0280
000075600ISO
75350800
57
701005
044044700
590007500
NA61006300
262000
41100
005.J5
10007020055
13OO2
NANA
10000NANA
tjeCamoomnA^fffLiNANANANANANANANA
PA Act 2 GroundW*ier MSC (Soo-Reridnttel. Ited
Aourftr)
100005
808010
58004100
5100900803
NAo->80
00560060075
100011057
701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA204105
100035
10007020055
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
vnv i09H4VO4
V779IO-4
< 4 6<063<022<034<03< 5
<046<031<046< 1 5< O I 6<026<035< 2 2<036<093<039<036<058< 1 '<026<069< I 665715 J
<022<0 14<016<054<069<1J<066< 1 3<032<055< 1 2
<041<024<027
527<028< 1 2<049
122778<1 3<l 3<073<034<034
<OOS6<0075
022
NONDNDNDNDNDND0
vw iI2/3V04NS6746-2
< 5 7<079<028< 0 4 3<037< 6 3<057<039<05«<l 8< 0 " ><033< 0 4 3< 2 8
<045< 1 2<04*<045<072< 1 5<033<086
<•>S46
<042<027< O I I< 0 2<067<or?< 1 8<083< 1 6< 0 4<069< 1 5<051<03<034476
<035<1J<062104644< 1 7<l 7<091<043<043<0056<0075
353
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
Wl
09/1404
ff779IO^
<23<J 1< 1 1< 1 7< 1 5< J< 2 3< 1 5<13< 7 3< 0 8 I< 1 3< 1 7< I I<l 1< 4 7< 1 9< It<2.9< 6 2< I J< 3 J116306
72 J<l 1<071<os<2.7<3J<7J< 3 3<63< I 6<1S< 5 9< 2
< 1 2< 142000< 1 4< 6 1< 2 531 7577
< 6 713
< 3 6<1 7<l 7
<00560371 5
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
VTW 1
1_OO04
NJ7405-I
233 1I 1I 71 5J•> 31 5-.37 3
O i li 31 7
1 84 71 9
< I 8< 2 9< 6 2< 13< 3 5<8 1•>ll
64 J< 1 1<071< O I<2.7<3J< 7 3<3J<6J< 1 6<Z8< 5 9< 2
< 1 2< 1 41130< 1 4<6 1< 2 5
18446
< 6 7<66< 3 6< 1 7< 1 7
<0056<0075<0066
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
vw j0*1*04
NT79IO-5
<570< 7 »
<ll<4 1<3 7<*30<57<39<i J
< I I O<-0<3 i<J 1<JO< 4 5
< I 2 0<4I
<45< 7 2
< I 5 0<33<86<200
120603<2.7<l 8<20<67<J7
< I I O<S3<I60<40<69< I 5 0<31<30<344530<35<I50<6281 6925
<170262<91<43<43
123918 1
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
SfW J
I--3XX
NM74A-I
n o6}
<055<OI6<074
U O1 1
<o •"1
O< U 4 I<U«>6<OS<st><U»<- 3
<097<09<l 4
<J 1<£&5< | 7142).W203
<£M<036<04<IJ<l 7<36<i ^<3 1
< O I I<l 4<30< 1 0<06<0687160<07<30<l 2144
148003627<18<086<086
23639353
NDVDVDVDIDVDVD0
NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not delected substantially above level in field blanks1C result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region ffl RBCs Apnl 2003 in italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-1 2 "> tnfluoroethane
Table 1 VOCali Fife 2 of 11OBnt AC E linerrt Inc
7/1 iai
![Page 36: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
T hbta GTOT* W Mr " — ,,1,
MW Minu/jcmnnj Stiperfuad Sin
Aaalyte
tenzenciroraodichlorome thaneJromoformBromome thane•> BUUDOIK (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon temchlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChlorometnaneCycloheune1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneTibromochlorometnane1,2 Dibromoe thane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobeiueoeDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane
1 1 Dichloroethenecis- 1.2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroetnene] 2 Dichloropropanecis-1 3 Dichloropropenetram 1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneFreoollB2 HexanooebopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetatevlethylcyclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 centanonefMTBK)Methylene chlondeStyrene1 1,2.2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2 4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1.1.2 TnchloroetnaneTnchloroetheneTnchloron oromethaneVinyl chlondem.o-Xvleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneT«aa«n»rf 14-tfrfjffffaffSSfc1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran tetrahydro-ketooesunknownTotal TICs
UitPA IWnkETWater MCL
orRhkBoedConetntnttoo
58080
as19001000
51103680
190NA0280
000075600
ISO75
350800
7701005
044044700
590007500
NA61006300
26200041100
00535
10007020055
13002
NANA
10000NANA
A^5ih«*<roMNANANAHANANANANA
Water MSC (Noo-RokteDtial. Und
Aouifer)
100005
808010
38004100
5100900803.
NA0280
00560060075
1000110
770100
5NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20
4105
100035
100070200
55
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
MW-4
0*14/04
N779IO-3
<063<022<034< 0 3<5
<046< 0 3 I<046< 1 5
<0 16<026<035< 2 2<036<093<039<036<058<! 2
<026
< 1 611 1
1 3 1<022<0 14< O I 6<054<069< I J<066< 13<032<055< I 2<041<024<027921
<02g< 1 2
<049193103
< 1 3< 1 3<073.<034<034<0056<0075<0066
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
NfW-4
12^2004
NU746-I
< 11< 1 6
<0_55<086<074<13< 1 1
<OT7< 12< 3 7
< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6<09< 2 3<097< 0 9< I 4<3 1<065
<41X4
<084<054<OJ6<04< 1 3< 1 7< 3 6< I 7<3 1<081< I 4<3< 1
< 0 6<068773< 0 7<3
< 12159891<33< 3 3< I 8
< O K<086
<OQS6<0075<00«6
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
MW 5
09rl4A4
NT7910-I
< II< 16<055< O M<074< 1 3< 1 1<077< 1< 3 7
< 0 4 I<066< o n< 5 6< 0 9<2J<orr< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<063
< 422
<084<054<OJ«<04<l 3< I 7< 3 6<n< 3 1<081< 1 4<3< l
<06<0682890< 0 7<3
<1 2454172
< 3 3< 3 3<1 8<08«<0&6
<OQ5« J<OO75 «<0066
NDNDSDNDNDNDND0
MW5
lim>O4
NS«74«.5
< 11< 1 6<035<086<0 74< 13< 1 1
< O T 7< 1<3 7
< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6<0»< 2 3<on< 0 9< 1 4<3 1
<065
< 490117 J<054<OJ«<04< I 3< 1 7< 3 6<l 7<3 1
< O I 1< 1 4< 3< 1
< 0 6<0683150< 0 7< 3
< 12484193
< 3 3< 3 3< 18<:086<OS6<0056<0075<0066
NDNDVDNDNDNDNDo
MW-*
0*1 */O*
N7T9IO-
13< 0 3 I< 0 I I
0 17< 0 I J<15<0 J<0 15<0_!010011
<0 13<0 17< 1 1
< 0 1 >«047<0 19< a u<0 ^9<06' )
< 0 1 3
< O I II I 9
<0 17<0 11<007I<OOS<027<OJ5<073<033<0i3<0 16<028<OJ9< 0 2<0 12<0 14
221<0 14< 0 6 l<025<0 17459
<067< O M<036<0 17<0 17<0056<0075
115
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
MW-4
IJ^QfTM
*a«746O
< u< 3 1< 1 1< 1 7< 1 5< J
1
< 1 *< 3< 1
O i l< 1 '
1 7I I
< 1 1< 4< 1 <>
< 1 1
<^9< 6 2< IJ
<8 137
62 J< 1 1
< 0 7 1< O I<2.7< 3 5< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6< 28< 5 9< 2
< 1 2< 1 41270< 1 4<6 I< 2 5< 1 7275
< 6 7< 6 6< 3 6< 1 7< 1 7
<005«<0075
374
VDVDVDVDVDVDND0
NottlJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB noc detected substantially above level in field blanks1C result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region ffl RBO, April 2003 in italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-l 12 tnfluoroethane
Tiblel VOC»li Pije 3 of 11OBnr AC Engine n IHC
/IMS
![Page 37: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
T.M.Iof VOO Im Growl W Mr
MW Muuficmniif Superfund SJK Vilky Tovutip
Anaiytt
Valaalt Orgame CompomnJt (pg/1)
lenzeneIromodichlorome thaneiroraoform
Bromome thane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzenerhloroethane-hJoroformIhiororaethane
Cyclohexane2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromochloromethane1,2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene
3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-Dichlorobenzene>ichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane
1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecis 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene
2 Dichloropropanecis 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzrneireon 1 132 HexanoneIsoprooYlbenzeneMethyl AcetatevlethylcyclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlondeStyrene. 1 2 2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2 4-Tnchlorooenzene[ 1 1 Tnchloroethane1,1.2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetbeneTnchlorofluoroinethaneVinyl chlondem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneVie thane
1 Propene 2 bromo-alconolscycloalkane/alkcnc[Xmethyl sulfideftiran. tetrahydro-ketonesunknownTotal T1C5
CSEPADHnESTW»t»rMCL
orRiikBaMdConcratnttoa
58080
8519001000
51103680
190NA0280
000075600
ISO75
350800
57701005
044044700
59000J500
NA61006300
26100041100
005J5
100070200
55
1300•2
NANA
10000NANA
NANANANANANANANA
PAActlC™33~Witcr MSC (Non-Reridndal Uftd
Awifcr)
5808010
38004100
5100900803
NA '0280
00560060075
1000no57701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20410
5100035
10007020055
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
VTW7
I2T9KJ4
N87352 5
<2391 3< 1 1<l 7< 1 5<25< 2 3<1 5< / ) 3< 7 3< 0 8 I< 1 3< 1 7< 11< 1 8< 4 7<1 9< 1 8< 2 9< 6 2< 13< 3 55015320664< 1 1
<071<08< 2 7< 3 5< 7 3< 3 3<63< 1 6<I8< 5 9< 2
< I 2< 14998
59 J< 6 1< 2 5174
1920< 6 71540< 3 6<1 7< 1 7166129
1460
ND430 J
NDNDNDND
110J540 J
VfW-i
I2/2*O4
N^352 3
<57I9S I< 8<4 3< 3 7<63< 5 7< 3 9< 5 8< 18< 2
< 3 3< 4 3<Z8< 4 5< 1 2< 4 8< 4 5< 7 2< 15< 3 3< 8 6459
17400221
< 2 7< 1 8< 2
< 6 7< 8 7<18<83< 16<4
<69<15<5 1<3
< 3 4457017 ;< 15< 6 2241
•>760< 178630< 9 1< 4 3< 4 39751620266
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
VfW-»(DtO?1
1J *0«
N87352-*
<57IS ]<18< 4 3< 3 7<63< 5 7<3 9< 5 8< 18< 2
<3 3<4 3< J< 4 5
< 12< 4 8< 4 5< 7 2< 15< 3 3< 8 6449
16800135
<17< U< 2
< 6 7< 8 7<18< 8 3< I 6< 4
<69<15<5 1<3
< 3 44270158 J< 15< 6 2230600
< 178260< 9 I< 4 3< 4 38231700 .•>49
VDNDVDNDNDNDNDo
trw *I.TSKM
M7352 2
< 110< 16< 5 5< S 6
7 4< IX)< 11
7 7< 1<}7<4 1< 6 6< « 7<»< 9<23< 9 7< 9
< 14< 3 I< 6 5< 17<40657< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4
< 1 3< |7<>6< 17<31<8 1< 14<30< 10<6
<6827800
< 7<30< 12181
1320<33<33< 18< 8 6< 8 6
0 1 2 B047
089B
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
\O» U
IJ-SK*
NTH52 7
603 I1.61•cO 11<0 17<0 15< _ s<0-3<0 15
0-3<0 3< 0 0 « l< 0 1 3<0 17< 1 1
<0 IS< 0 4 7<0 19< 0 1 S<029< 0 6 2
1 9J<03549919«IO47 8 J< 0 1 1<0071<on033 J<OJ5955J<033<063<0 16<02S9 9 )< 0 2
<0 12< 0 1 43 3 137 J
< 0 6 I<025<0 17085 J<06723400086 1035 J
1 2J1470419014600
8331ND
95 JN79 W
18 I138 J
8822 J
VO* 13
I-T*0«
•O7I64-I
)<0 51< 0 I I
0 10 M
< 5<0 J
0 150 J0 \) Ml0 1 '1 I
1 1j \ tf ) 4
0 H<0 I I<0 'N< 0 6 2< 0 I J< 0 3 S< O S I
>l< 0 1 7< 0 I I<007)<0«<027<OJ5<0 3< 0 3 3< 0 6 3<0 16<0-J<059< 0 2
<0 1<0 14069 I<0 14<061<025<0 17
1 6<067<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056
0075<0066
NDNDNDSDSDND0
NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in Held blanks1C result is biased nighND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exuts)
USEPA Region ffl RBCs April 2003 in italicsFreonlB 1 1 2 tnchloro-l 22 tnfluoroethane
Tiblel VOC-xli Pi«e4ofO Bntn AC E gate rt fnc
![Page 38: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Tabfc IrfVOOoiGn«dW Mr
MW Mwihcmniil Super-fund S tc Villey Towubip
Analyte
lenzeneIromodichloromethane
BromoformBromomethane2 Buumone IMEK)Carbon disulfideCarton tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroe thaneChloroform
Chlorome thaneCyclone xane
2 Dibromo-3-chioropropanehbromochloromethane
1 ,2 Dibromoethane1 2 DichlorobenzeneJ Dichlorobenzene4-Dichlorobenzene
Jichlorodifluoroinethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecis l/> Dichloroeihenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1,3 DicnloroeropeneEthylbenzeneTeonll32 tiexanonejopropylbenzenevlethyt AcetatertethylcyclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oenUnone(MTBK)Methyleoe chlondeStyrene1 1 2,2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene
1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 \ ,2 TnchloroethaneTn hloroetheneTnchlorofluorornethaneVinyl chlondem,p-Xvieneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEthene
Ttrtatmb IdtMMVolatJt OtW1 Propene 2 bromc-alcoholjcycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl uilfideFuran tetrahydro-
unknownTotal TICs
USJKPA IMnUHTWater MCL
or Riik Baaed
58080
8S19001000
51103680
790VA02SO
000075600ISO75
350800
57701005
044044700
590001500
NA61006300
26200041100
00535
100070
20055
13002
NANA
10000NANA
NANANANANANANA
Water MSC (NeoRcddendaJ, U«d
Aouifer)
580SO10
58004100
5100900SO3
NA02SO
00560060075
100011057701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20
4105
100035
100070200
55
20002
NANA
10000NANA
W~^NANANANANANANANA
MW 15
09/iftAH
N78002-»
< 7 9< 2 S< 4 3< 3 7<63< 5 7< 3 9< 5 8< 18< • >
< 3 3< 4 3<->8< 4 5< 12< 4 8< 4 5< 7 2< 1 5< 3 3<:86<20J55
<:42<17< I 8< 2
< 6 7< 8 7<18< 8 3<16<4
< 6 9<15<5 1< 3
< 3 410400< 3 5<15< 6 2J3\1700<17269< 9 1< 4 3< 4 3028144 1
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
V1W IS
12HSAX
N87164-3
< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4<130< 11< 7 7< 12<37<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<56< 9
<23< 9 7<9
< 14< 3 I< 6 5<17<40699< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4< I 3< I 7<36< 17<31< 8 1< 14<30<10<6
<687160< 7<30< \ 2<S31120<33<.33< 18< 8 6< 8 6O ^ B
1 483
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
MW isiwnIJ7SXM
VTI64-1
< 110<16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4< 130< 11< 7 7< 1< 3 7<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<56<9
<23< 9 7<9
< 14< 3 I< 6 5<17<406*5< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4
< 13<17<36< 17< 3 I<8 1< 14<30< 10<6
< 6 86330< 7<30< 12<83978<33<33<18<86< 8 6
026B1 486
NDNDNDNDNDND0
MW It
IJ7I/O*
NUU6-7
<2.3< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15< _ 5
<023<0 15< 0 _ )< 0 7 3<008I<0 13< 0 1 7< 1 1
< O I 8< 0 4 7<0 19<0 IS<029<062< O I 3<035< 0 8 I<024<0 17< 0 I I<0071<00><027<OJ5<on<033<063<016<02S<0.59< 0 2
<0 12<0 14091 K<0 14< 0 6 I<025< 0 \ 7<0 13<067<066<03«<017<0 17
$0056<00750348
NDNDNDNDNDND0
MW 17
1./21JO*
VS6U6-9
3< 0 3 I< 0 I I<0 17<0 15
5<0 J<0 15
0_>< 0 7 3< n o 8 i<0 13<0 17< 1 1
<0 II< 0 4 7<0 19< O I 8<029<062<0 13< 0 3 5< 0 8 I<0 4<0 17< 0 I I<0071<00t<027<OJ5<071<033<063<0 16<02S<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14<037<0 14< 0 6 I<025< o n<0 13<067<066<036<an<0 17<0056<0075or!B
NDNDNDNDNDSD0
vrw it1.TI/W
NMI36-2
< 3<0 31<0 1 1<0 17<0 15< 50 J
< ) 15U _30 1
IM«I0 130 1
< 1 1<0 18<017<0 19<0 11<029<062<0 13<OJ5< 0 8 I
1 2<0 17<0 11<0071< O M<027<035<073<:033<:063•cO 16<02I•cO 59< 0 2
<0 12<0 14
9<0 14< 0 6 I<025<o n071 J< 0 6 7<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056<0075
404
VDNDNDNDNDSD0
NOW If
I_~I/O»
MMV«-l
1
0 ) 1< 0 I I
0 17o n
50 30 1'0 1) 1
1 WlU 1) 1I
U II0 4 70 19
<0 I I029
< 0 6 2< 0 1 3<035< O I I<0 4<0 17< 0 I I<007I< O M< o n< 0 3 5
073< 0 3 3<063
0 16<0 1< 0 5 9
0<0 1<0 14055 I<0 14< 0 6 1<0 J
on0 13
<067<066<036<0 17<0 17<0056<00750 13 B
SDSDSDSDNDSD0
NotesI estimated alue (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compound
B not delected substantially above level in field blanks
K result is biased high
ND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
US EPA Region ffl RBCs. April 2003 in italicsfreon 113 112 tnchloro-l 2.2 mfluoroethane
Tiblel VOCxli Pace S of 11
![Page 39: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
T.h*,l
VfW Maaufactunflt Superfuod S»* V*Jky T wnstup PA
Aiwlytc
ienzenesrornodichloromethaneBroraoformBromome thane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChi oroe thane"hlcToformChi orome thaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneDlbromochJ orome thane1,2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroetheiwcii- 1.2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis-1 3-DicUoropropenetram 1,3 DichlcroprooeneEthylbenzeneFreonIB2 Hexanone[soDropylbenzeneMethyl AcetateMethylcvclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2 Denb>none(\fTRK)Metbylene chlondeStyrene1 12,2 TetrachloroethaneTetnchloroetheoeToluene1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 . 1 ,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlondem.D-XYteneo-XyleneXylene (local)EthaneEtheneMethaneTtaUMh I4-"f^ v«^«fnr1 Propene 2 brocno-alcoholsCYcloalk>"^»lt««gChmethyl sulfideftiran. tetrahydro-
unknownTotamCs
TSBTBRaSi-Wiier MCL
orftfakBaedCooc.ntr.Uoo*
58080
as19001000
51103680
790NA0280
000075600
ISO75
3SO800
57701005
044044700
59000J500
NA5/00«00
26'00041100
00535
100070200
55
13002
NANA.
10000NANA
y<^m»«ml*(at/LNANANANANANANANA
Waur MSC (MooResidential, U«rd
Awufer)
5808010
58004100
5100900803 '
NA0280
OOi60060075
1000no57
701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA204105
100035
10007020055
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
(«*>NANANANANANANANA
MW 20
I2/22W
N86941-4
< 0 3 I< 0 1 1<0 17<0 15< - > 5<023<015<023<073<008I< O I 3<0 17< 1 1< 0 i »<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035
1 720636
< 0 I I<0071<008<027<OJ5<073<033<063<01«<028<059< 0 2
<0 12<014J67
< O I 4<061<02J085 i283
<0671 1
<036<017<0 170 1 8 B<0075
1 9
MW 12
09/I5AM
N77911 2
< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4<I30< 11<n< 12<37<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<5«<»
<23< 9 7<9
< 14< 3 1< 6 5<17<406240150
< 5 4<36< 4< 1 3<17<36< 17<31<8 1< 14<30<10<6
< 6 8248<7<30< 12< 8 31640<33
47 1 J< 1 &<*6<«604303395
MWU
I_T>7*>4
Wi l l 5
< no< 16< 5 5< 8 6< 7 4<130< I I< 7 7< P< 3 7<4 1< 6 6< 8 7<5«< »
<23<17<9
< 14< 3 1< 6 5<17<405780862< 5 4<36< 4
< 13<|7<J6< 17< 3 I<8 1< 14<30<10<6
< 6 8221< 7<30< 1 2< 8 31410<33<33<1»<8«< 8 6
045B051
14
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
MW 25*n/a»4N7JI56-1
< 11< 16<055<OS6< 0 7 4< 13< 1 1<OTT< 1< 3 7
< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6c09< 5<097
< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<065< 1 7<435316 1<054<03«< 0 4< I 3< 1 7< 3 6<l 7<3 1
< 0 » 1< 1 4< 3< 1
< 0 6<0682270< 0 7< 3
< 1 2353229
< 3 3< J 1<H
<OM<086<K056<*075<0066
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
MW IS
I./77/04
N«71U )
<4e< 6 3<
3 43
< 50< 46< 1 \< 46
15< 1 6
6< 35<: - -< 36<« 1
59< 3 6< 5 8< 12< _ 6< 6 9< 1664
< 3 4< 2< 1 4< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9< \ 5< 6 6< 1 3< 3 2< 5 5< I 2<4 1< 1 4< 73460< 1 8< 12< 4 931 6m< 13< 13< 7 3< J4< 3 4
<005«<0075<0066
SDNDNDVDSONDND0
MW U
OWI7/04
N7J156.
< )< 0 3 I<0 11
0 1<0 15< 5<0 J
o \ s0 _30 )
O O R I
< 0 1 10 1
1 1
0 IS0 4 7
<0 19<0 It<029<062< O I 3<035< O S I413
< O I 7< O I I<007I<OOS<o-n<035< 0 7 3< 0 3 3<063<0 16<02J<059< 0 2
<0 12<0 14
117<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17
»1<067<066
<036<0 17<0 170 11
<00754 3
NDVDNDNDSONDND0
MW 2*
iy wst m
\< 0 J l< 0 I I
0 170 15
50 3> !•.U _ l0 1I MlU 1 10 1
1 1
0 II0 40 11
<0 II<o >»< 0 6<0 13< 0 3 5< O I I6*9
< O I 7< 0 I I<ao7i<oo»< o ^< O J 5<0 )< 0 J J< 0 6 3<0 16<0 J< 0 5 9< 0
<0 P<0 142 4 2
<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17
155< 0 6 7
<066< 0 3 6<0 17<0 17<0056<0075
578
VDVDVDVDVDVDVD0
NotesJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region m RBCs, April 2003 m italicsFreon 113 II1 fnchloro-l 2.2 tnfluoroethane
Table! VOCxU Pjjt6oill0 Brtf AC E gutter Inc
![Page 40: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
T Mil
MW MuufKtunni Superfuad S K V«]k T wnibip PA
Analytc
ienzeneIromodichlororoethaneiromoform
Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroe thaneChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneDibromochloromethane1,2 Dibromoethaoe1 2 Dichlorobenzene
3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethaoe1 2 Dichloroethane
I Dichloroethenecis 1.2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis- 1.3 Dichloropropenetraos-1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbcnzeneFreoo 1132 HexanoneIsonroovlbenzeneMethyl Acetatevfethylcyclobexane
Methyl tert Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanone(MIBK)vlethylene chlonde
Styrene1 1 2.2 TetrachloroethsneTetrachJoroetbeneTolueneI 2 4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethaoe1 . 1 .2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTn hlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlondem.t>-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneTVirtttTMff IdatifM VfbaSU^ffpa-1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholicycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran tetrahydro-ketooesunknownTotal TICs
UMiPA Drink^-WaterMCL
orRfckBuedConcentradoo
58080
8519001000
51103680
190NA0280
000075600
ISO75
3SO300
57701005
044044700
590007500
NA61006300
26200041100
005J5
10007020055
13002
NANA
10000NANA
OfflmrrumtrtiftBNANANANANANANANA
PA Act 1 GroundWater MSC (Noo-lUridenttal, U«ed
Amiftr)
5808010
58004100
5100900803 '
NA0280
00560060075
100011057701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20
4105
100035
100070200
55
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
NfW »
I2/23AJ4
N86988-3
<13< 0 3 l<0 11«0 17<0 15<15<023<0 15<023<073
<OOSI< 0 1 3<0 17< 1 1< 0 1 8<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035< 0 8 I<024< 0 1 7< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<016<028<059<02
<0 12< 0 1 4<037<0 14<061<02J<0 17<0 13<0 67<066<03«< O I 7<017026B<0075
756
NDNDNDNDNDND15 J15 J
MW JO
0*17/04
V78 156-3
< 1 6<055<086< 0 7 4<13<1 1
<077<1 •>< 3 7
< 0 4 l<066<087< 5 6< 0 9< 2 3
<097< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<065<l 7< 4no68
<054<036< 0 4< I 3< I 7< 3 6< 1 7<3 1
<081< 1 4<3< 1
< 0 6<0682060<07<3
< 1 2174347
< 3 3< 3 3<l 8
<086<086<005«<0075
015
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
MW3«
I2/TV04
NI69U-2
<23<3 1< 1 1< 1 7< 1 5<_5< 3< 1 5< 3< 7 3< 0 g l< I 3< 1 7< 1 1< 1 8<4 7< I 9< 1 8< 2 9< 6 2< U< 3 5<*.!175
8 1 J< 1 1<071< 0 8< 2 7< 3 5< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6< ^ 8< 5 9< 2
<1 2<1 41730< 1 4<6 1< 2 5119285< 6 7< 6 6< 3 6< 1 7<l 7
<0056<0075
1 5B
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
0«-J
I2/-*VO«
N8TJ5 -6
< 110< 1*< 5 5< 8 6<•> 4< 130< 1 1< 7 7< 1< 3 7<» \< 6 6f
<56< 9<23< 9 7< 9
< 14< 3 1< 6 5< 17<406«9< 8 4< 5 4< 3 6< 4
< I 3< I 7<36<17<31<8 1< 14<30< \ 0<6
< 6 827300
< 7<30< 12242
20400<33<33< 18< 8 6<86
<0fi56OSl183
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
OS-5
9VI6O4V7J002 10
<2J<] 1< 1 1< i ^< \ 5<-5< 3< 1 5< 3< 7 3< 0 * \< 3< 7
< I< 7< 9< S< 9< 6< 1 3< 3 5<l 1470I I 6
< 1 1< 0 7 1< 0 »<17<3J< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3<1 6< 2 8< 5 9<1
< 1 •>< 1 41270< 1 4<6 1< 2 5266384< 6 7103
< 3 6< 1 7<l 7232
0094 J22 1
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
Oft-S
IV2MX
NTMfrM
*6< 4 3< fc
< ) ')
< V)< 46
3 1< *6
15I 6
< 61 5
< 3 6< 9 3< 3 9< 3 6< ) l< 12<»6<6.9< 16674< 3 4<1J< 14< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9< I 5< 6 6< 13< 3 2< 5 5< 1 2<4 1< 2 4<2.72410< 2 8< P< 4 988
626< 13< 13< 7 3< 3 4< 344 7 1
<0075347
NDVDVDNDNDVDND0
Oft- 1*
\J^~Vt
< Z3< J 1< 1 1< 1< 1 5< J
»3< J
_ )i
O i l3
1
t1
196 21333
97 JBJ< I 7< 1 1<&7I<ai<17< 3 5< 7 3< 33< 6 3< I 6
1< 5 9< J
< 1 2< 1 41700< 1 4<6 1<2JM 7946< 6 7ni< 3 6< 1 7< 17
0 168<OCT75
545
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
NoieaJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region 01 RBCs, AprU 2003 m italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-1 2.2 tnfluoroethane
Tiblel VOCjili Pi«e 7 of 110 Bngn A C £n| Merr /nc
![Page 41: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
MW Minuficmruii Sopofuod S « ViUey To»Mtti(i PA
Analyt*
ienxeneJrornodichlorotnethaneIromofonn
Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobeozeneChloroe thaneChJorofonnChlorornetha'ieCyclohexane
2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane)ibromochloromethane1 2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 Dvchlorobeniene1 4-Dichlocobenzene)ichlorodif1uoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichlocoethane1 1 Dichloroethenecii-1.2 Dichloroetbenetram 1 2 Dichloroetnene1 2 Dichloropropanecu 1 3 Dichloropropeoetran5 1.3 DichloropmueneEthylbenzeneFreonlU2 HeunoneIsooropylbenzenevlethyi AcetatevlethylcvclohexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 pentanooe(MIBK)vlethylene chlondeStyrene1 1 2,2 TetrachloroethaneTcQ^hloroeiheneToluene1 .2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1.1.'' TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlondem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethane
1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscvcloalkane/alkeoeDimethyl sulfideFunn tetrahydro-kelooesunknownToulTlCs
ISKPA DrinkerWater MCL
or Risk BatedConcentndon
53030
8519001000
51103680
190NA0 2SO
000075600180
75350800
57701005
044044700
590001500
NA61006300
26200041100
00535
100070200
55
1)002
NANA
10000NANA
afVtmtlu*4(rt/UNANANANANANANANA
PA Act ! GnST~Wiur MSC (Noo-KtstdetHtal, Uicd
Aquifer)
5808010
58004100
5100900803
NA0280
00560060075
1000no57701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20
4105
100035
10007020055
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
v=:
NANANANANANANANA
OB- 1309/16/04
V78002 1
< 11< 1 6<055<086<074<13< 1 1<077< 1 2< 3 7< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6<09< 2 3
<097<09< 1 4<3 1<065< 1 7< 4462
<084<054<036< 0 4<13< 1 7< 3 6<1 7< 3 1
<081< 1 4<3< 1
< 0 6<068
701< 0 7<3
< 1 2<083
127< 3 3< 3 3< 1 8<086<086<0056<0075
022
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
OB-IJ
IJ71/O4
N86»3«-4
< 0 3 I< O I 1<0 17< 0 1 5<2.5
<023<0 15<023<073<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1<018<047< O I 9< 0 1 8<029<062<013<035< 0 8 I202
<0 17< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<02S<059< 0 2
< O I 2<014
345<0 14<061<02J06 J647
<067<066<036<017<0 17<0056<0075036B
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
OB-14
09/15*H
VT7911 3
<46
< 6 3< _ • >< 34<3<50< 4 6<3 1< 4 6< 15< 1 6< 6< 3 5<2.< 3 6< 9 3< 39< 3 6< 5 8< 12<2.6< 6 9< 162610356<2.2< 1 4< 1 6<:54<69< 15< 6 6< 1 3< 3 2< 5 5< 12<4 1< 2 4< 2 72130< 2 8< P< 4 929310«0< 13< 13< 7 3< 3 4< 3 406S
<007567
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
OB-14
IJT2AX
VM94I 5
<46< 6 3< ^< 34< 3<50< 4 6<3 1< 4 6< 15< 1 6< 6< 3 5< 2< > 6<93< j»< 3 6< 5 8< 12<16< 6 9
213740264<2.2< 1 4< 16< 5 4< 6 9< 1 5< 6 6< 13< 3 2< 5 5< I 2< 4 l<2.4<-73550< 2 8< 12< 4 94381640< 13<13<7J< 3 4< 3 4
0*7B< 0*075
45
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
re-irr09/16AM
fiani
< 110'i j< 5 5< 8 6
7 4< 130< 1 1< 7 7< 1< }7
4 166
< S 756
< 9< -J< 9 7
<9< 14< 3 I< 6 5< 179382660
215 J< 5 4< 3 6<4< 13< I 7<36< 17<31<8 1< 14<30< 10<6
< 6 87630< 7<30< 12130
3030< 3 3228<18< S 6< 8 6
1 422 1190
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
rz-irrIJT&O*
MT? 144-6
< ¥ >< 6 3< fc
< )*< )<50< 46< 3 1
4 61<
1 66
» 5
< ! 69 j
< 3 9< 3 6< 5 8< 12<16<694111100< 3 4<2J< 1 4< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9< 15< 6 6< 13< 3 2< 5 S< 12<4 1< 4<173460< 2 8< 12< 4 94961580
137«9< 7 3< 3 4< 3 417817157
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
rT-iTT
1J7MM
< 11< 1 6
< 0 5 50160 74n
1 10 "7
t)
0 4 10601*< 6
< U »1
on< 0 9
< 1 4
<1 1
<065< I 1< 4JJ»14
<054<03o< 0 4< 13< 1 7< J6< 1 7
< ) 1O i l
1 4< 3< 1
< 0 6<06«964< 0 7< 3
< 1 295582
< 3 314 1< 1 >
<086<08e0 13B044
B
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
Notev] estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result a biased highND not delectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Rcpoo ffl RBCi, Apnl 2003 m italicsFreonll3 1 1 2 mchloro-1 2,2 mnuoroethane
Tibkl VOCjili Page 8 of 11
OBntm AC E gtnt tnc7/IJA)}
![Page 42: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
TafcfclSa^^y of VOO - Oo—d W — ' ^u
MW Muuiicniniif Supofuod S K Vjjic T wtuiup PA
AnaljrU
ienzeneiromodichlorome thaneBromofonnBromomethane2 Butanone (M£K)Carbon cbsulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromelhaneCyclohexane1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneDibromoc hi orome thane1 2 Dibromoethane1 2 DtchJorobenzene1 3 Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethanet 1 Dichloroethenecu 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1,3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneFreonll32 HexanoneIsopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetateMethylcyclobexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (VTTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanondMIBK)Vfethylene chlorideStyrene1 1 2,2 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 ,2.4-TnchlorobenzBne1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 . 1 .2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheaeTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chloridera.D-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethane
1 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscvcloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideRiran tetrahydro-ketonesunknownToulTICs
"csBTroaa rWater MO.
orRiikBMtdCoocentr«tfcKi
580SO
8519001000
51103680
190NA0280
000075600
ISO75
J50SOO
57701005
044044700
59000V500
NA61006300
26200041100
005.75
100070200
55
13002
NANA
10000NANA
NANANANANANANANA
Water MSC (Noa-Heridenttal, Used
Aouifer)
100005
808010
58004100
5100900803
NA •0280
00560060075
1000no57
701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20410
510003
5100070200
55
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
PZ-3IT
I-/79/O4
N8735-> 1
<23<3 1< 1 1< U< 1 5<25< 2 3< 1 5< 2 3< 7 3< 0 8 I< 1 3< 1 7< I I< 1 8
471 91 829621 3
< 3 5<8 1115
53 J< 1 1<071< 0 8<17<35< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6<28< 5 9< 2
< 1 2< 144160< 1 4< 6 1< 2 5358467
< 6 7< 6 6< 3 «< 1 7< 1 7
<0056<0075
1 3B
NDNDNDVDNDNDND0
PZ-W1
OWISO4
VT79II-6
< ^ 3< 0 3 I< 0 I I<0 17<0 15< 2 5<023<0 15<023<073
<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1
< 0 1 8<047<0 19<0 18<029<062< O I 3<035< 0 8 I
21<0 17<0 11<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<016<028<059<02< 0 1 2<014266
< O I 4<061<023< O I 7
132<067<066<036< 0 1 7<0 17<005«<0075
04
NDNDNDNDNDND0
PZ-W1
1./2JO4
V 86941
< 2 3< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15<2.5<023<0 15<0-3< 0 7 3
<008I< O I 3<0 17< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029< 0 6 2<0 13<035< O S I
18,5<017<0 11<0071<00»<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<018<059< 0 2
< O I 2<0 14
263<0 14< 0 6 I<025< 0 1 7
136<067<066<036< 0 1 7<0 17<0056<00750 5 B
NDNDNDNDNDND0
PZ-W2
09/IVO4
VT791I 1
< 1 1J
<055<OI6< 0 7 4< 13< 1 1<077< 1< 3 7< 0 4 I<066<087< 5 6< 0 9< 2 3
<097< 0 9< 1 4<3 1<065< 1 768
197012
<054<03«< 0 4< 1J<1 7< 3 6< 1 7<3 1< 0 8 I< 1 t<3< 1
< 0 6<068654< 0 7<3
< 1 2109487
< 3 354
< 1 8<086<08«0780136"l
NDNDNDNDNDND0
fZ-W2
1172AX
VM44I-6
J<3 1< 1 1< 1 1< 1 5< J< 3< 1 5< 3< 3< O I I< 1 3< 1
< 1 S< 4
< t 9< 1 8< 2 9< 6< 1 3< 3 5<l 11330< 1 7< 1 1< 0 7 I< 0 8<2.7<3J< 7 3< 3 3< 6 3< 1 6<18< 5 9< 2
< 1 2< 1 4418
< 1 4<6 1< 2 50 7337
< 6 7<66< 3 6<1 7< 1 7
075B025139
NDNDNDNDNDND0
• W 35I.T1/O4
•06*36-5
<13< 0 3 I
0 I Ion
<0 15< 5
0 J0 15l) -30 71
1)0*1
<u n0 1
< i i< o i s< 0 4 7<U 19< O I I<029< 0 6 2<0 13< 0 3 3< 0 8 I<0 14<017<0 I t<007l< O M<027<OJ5<073< 0 3 3<063<0 16<02S<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14< 0 3 7<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17<0 13<067<066<03«<0 17<0 17<0056<00750 5 3 B
NDNDNDNDNDND0
sat-4\J~~l/Ot
M I M - 6
57< 4
< 14 )
< )7
<&35!•»< 1I I
t t4 1
J
4 5
1
«*
t i
7< 15< U< I 6<20113
< 4 2<17< l l< 2
<6.7<|7< II<S 3< 16< 4
< ( > 9< 15<3 1< 3
< 34i no<3 5< 15< 6 27381310< 17
17<9 1< 4 3< 4 ]
O I 3 B<0075i ) 4B
NDNDNDNDND"ID0
NoieiJ estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not delectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region m RBCs April 2003 IB italicsFreonll3 1 1 2 tnchloro-1 2,2 tnfluoroethane
TaMel VOCxb Pi(e9of 1OBru iC E SIM rj tmf
/U/05
![Page 43: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
TifcfalSanMr? of VOO ta Ooad W«
MW MMuficnmiuj Supofund S K Valley Towndup PA
Analyl*
benzeneJromodichJorome thaneiromoforrn
Bromomethane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChlorofonnChloromethaneCyclohexane
1 "> Dibromo-3-chloropropane>bromochJoro me thine1 2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 3 DichiorobenzeneI 4-DichlotobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1 1 Dichloroetbaue1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecii 1 ,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 DichloroetheneI 2 Dichloropropinecis-1 3 Dichloropropenetmu 1,3 DichloropropeneEthyl benzeneFreon 1132 HexanoneIsopropvibenzeneMethyl AcetateMethylcyclohexaneMethyl tert Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 oentanonelMIBK)Methylene chlondeStyrene1 1 23 TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2,4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1,1,2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTn hlorofluoromethaneV\nyl chlondern p-Xvleoeo-XyleneXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneTeiOatmty fjnoifitl I'ffHft1 "tl 11 Propene 2 bromo-alcoholscycloalkane/alkeneDimethyl sulfideFuran tetnhydro-
unknownTotal TICs
IMPAPrfaUnTWmler MCL
or Risk BawdCoocnitndea
58080
as19001000
51103680
190NA0280
000075600
ISO75
J50400
57701005
044044700
59000/500
NA4/006300
26200041100
005J5
10007020055
13002
NANA
10000NANA
NANANANANANANA__NA____
PA Act 2 C™33-WiUr MSC (Moo-ReddendaL Died
Aautfer)
5808010
58004100
5100900803
N A /02$0
00560060075
100011057701005
NANA700
170000NA
23001 00000
NA204105
100035
10007020055
20002
NANA
10000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
SBR-*
\2T9tO4
N87352-4
< 11<l 6<055<OS6<074< 1 3< 1 1<077< 1< 3 7
<041<066<087< 5 6< 0 9< 2 3
<097< 0 9<1 4<3 1<065< 1 71091770
5<054<036< 0 4< 1 3< 1 7< 3 6<1 7< 3 l<081< I 4<3< 1
<06<0684210<07<3
< 1 2877584
< 3 3135<18<086 '<086
<005«015
066B
NOND61 1NDNDNDND61 I
ssr vIJ2IAM
N86836-I
31 8< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15<2.5<023<0 15<023<073
<008I<0 13< 0 1 7< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035<08I
171< O I 7<0 I I<0071<OOS<027<OJ5<073<033<063<0 16<028<059< 0 2<012<014154
< O U<061<025< O I 7404
<06786
<03«<0 17< O I 7033B013126
52 JNNDNDNDNDNDND
52 J
SSP 1 tTXjT)
I-TIAK
NS6S36-IO
332< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15< 1 5
<023<0 15< o j< 0 7 3
<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<018<029<062<0 13<035< O S I
167<0 17< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<0-8<059< 0 2
< O I 2<0 14
154<014< 0 6 l<025<0 17382
<0678
<036<0 17< O I 70 3 B014 .126
NDNDNDNDNDVDND0
ssr iIJ2I/O4
SS6O6-3
<2.3< 0 3 1<0 11<0 17<0 15< ^ 5<0 J<0 15<0-J< 0 7 3
< O M I0 13
<0 17< 1 1<0 11<0<7<0 19<0 11<0»< 0 6 2< O I 3< 0 3 5< 0 8 I7J5
< 0 1 7<Q 11<0071<00»<027<035<073<033<043<0 16<021<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14
62<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17
43<067
3 3<OJ6<0 17<0 170 1 7 B<0075
552
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
ssr 5IJ7&04
NT71W-
46063
<or:<o u
03< 50*t
<0 31046
1 <0 IIS0 6
<0 15
<o ><s< 0 f 1< 0 3 9<03«<058< 1<0^<069< 1 6
9<034< Q 2 2<0 14<0 16<OS4<069< 1 5<066< 1 3<032< 0 5 5< 1 i< 0 4 I<024<0271040
<028< 1<049< 0 3 3
1341 3
< 1 3<073<034<034<0056<0075
6 7
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
ssr i*I-/1104
SM941 i
3< 0 3 I< 0 I I
0 17<0 15< _ 500 |0 1' l0 _') 1
D I M IU 1') P! 1
<0 18(1471) 19
<0 I IO'"*
< 0 6 2< 0 1 3<035< O I I<024<0 17< Q I I<007I<00«<027<035< o n< 0 3 3<063<0 16<0 J<059< 0 2<0 12<0 14<037<0 14< 0 6 I<025<0 17<0 13
Oi7<066<036<0 17<0 17
<0056<0075
0066
NDNDNDNDNDNDND0
NotesI estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substanoally above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detected
USEPA Region ffl RBCs April 2003 in tolicifreonl l3 I 1 2 mchloro- 1 !"> tnfluoroethane
Tiblel VOCxb Pige 10 f 11O Bntn AC Is** Inc
![Page 44: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
T MilSuoMmry gf VOO ta Grand W»
MW Muultcmnat Superfuad S tc Vilfcy Towufcip PA
Aiulrtc
VolaOl* Orgmie ComfommJ* (jigOJ
ienzenefromodichlccome thaneSrorooform
Bromome thaneBuunone (MEK)
Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlonde
ChlorobcnzeneChloroethaoeChloroformChi orome thaneCyclohexane
1 2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane3ibromochlorome thane1,2 Dibromoethane1 2 Dichlorobenzene1 j Dichlorobenzene1 4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodjfluoromethane1 1 Oichloroethane1 2 Dichloroethane1 1 Dichloroethenecis 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Oichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropanecis- 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans- 1 3 DichloroororjeneEthylbenzeneFreoo 1132 rfexanoneIsoDroDvlbenzeneMethyl AcetateVlethylcyclonexaneMethyl ten Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methvl 2 Dentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 1 22 TetnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 ,2,4-Tnchlorooenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethanel.l.2TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneV nyl chloridem p-Xyleneo-XyleaeXylene (total)EthaneEtheneMethaneT* f nYi nBWHfff"' vfffa^''/*Tthl
1 Propene. 2-brotno-alcohoUryrln»lk»nr/>nreqe
Dimethyl nilfideFuran, tetrahydro-ketonaunknownTotal TICs
"CSEPTUSSBSrWater MCL
orfUskBaMdfiMiceutr^tfaMi
58030
as19001000
51103680
190NA0 280
000075600
ISO75
350800
57701005
044044700
590007500
NA61006300
2600041100
005.?5
100070200
55
13002
NANA
10000NANA
•yMT-.n..^ tu*KNANANANANANANANA
W«i«r MSC (Noo-ReUdrottal. Uirt
Awiifcr)
100005
808010
58004100
5100900803
NA0 280
00560060073
100011057701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20
4105
100035
100070200
55
20002
NA ,NA
1 0000NANANA
NANANANANANANANA
WPZ-J
OW1VO4
N779I1-4
< 2 3< 0 3 I<0 11<0 17<0 15< 5<023<0 15<0-3< 0 7 3<008I<0 13<0 17< 1 1<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029<062< 0 1 3<035<08l
33 1< 0 1 7< 0 I I<0071<008<027<035<073<OJ3<063<0 16<028<059< 0 2
<0 12<0 14
259<0 14<061<023092 J
145<067<066<03«<o.n< O I 7
<0056<0075036
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDo
WFZ-1
l-O-fl>4
S86941 1
< 1 3< 0 3 l<0 11<0 17<0 15< 5<023<0 15< 0 _ 5< 0 7 3<00«1<0 13<0 17< 1 1
<0 18<047<0 19<0 18<029<062<0 13<035<08I278
<017< 0 I I<007l<00«<027<035<073<033<063<0 16<028<059< 0 2
<0 12<0 14
282<0 14<06l<023069 J
134<067<066<036< 0 t<&n
<005«<0075 '058B
NDSDNDNDNDNDSD0
WFZ-J
O^IMX
N7JO02 3
<*6c6 3< ^< 54< 3
<50< 4 6< 3 1< 4 6< 15< 1 6< 6<3 5
< 3 6< 9 3< 3 9< 3 6< ^ »< 1< 2 6< 6 9< 16••10094 1<12< 1 4< 1 6< 5 4< 6 9<15< 6 6< 1 3< 3 2< 5 5< i:<4 1< 2 4< 2 72720< 2 8< 12< 4 941 8644
1313733414
0015 J<0075
045
VDNDNDNDNDSDND0
wrz-3[j^intST7IIM
577 9
< ..«< < 3< 3 7<»3< 57
! 9' i
< 18
) 1< A 1
I
< 4 5< 12
J »< 4 5< 7 2< 15< 3 3< S 6<X)3840<4 i< _ 7<l 8< 2
< 6 7< 8 7<18< « 3< 16< 4
< 6 9< 15<5 1< 3
< 3 44160< 3 5< 15< 6 258'US
/7< 17<9 I<4 3< 4 3
0688<0075
7 2
NDSDVDNDNDVDND0
Notes; estimated value (below PQL) N presumptive evidence of a compoundB not detected substantially above level in field blanksK result is biased highND not detectedNA not applicable (no standard exists)
USEPA Region ffl RBCi, Apnl 2003 at italicsFreon 113 112 tnchloro-1 U-tnfluoroetnane
Table! VOCol»
O Bng 4 G Efifutt J Inc
![Page 45: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Table 2Summary of VOO in Passive Diffusion Baj Ground Water S.mplri
MW Manufacturing Superfund Site. Vilky Township PA
Analyte
AcetoneBenzeneJromodichloromethaneJromoform
Bromomelhane2 Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfideCarbon cetrachlondeChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1 1 Dibromo-3-chloropropaneEhbromochloromethane
2 Dibromoethane2 Dichlorobenzene3-Dichlorobenzene4- Dichlorobenzene
3ichlorodifluoromethane1 Dichloroethane2 Dichloroethane1 Dichloroethene
cis 1,2 Dichloroethenetrans 1 2 Dichloroethene1 2 Dichloropropaneas 1 3 Dichloropropenetrans 1 3 DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneFreon 1132 HexanoneIsopropylbenzeneMethyl AcetatevlethylcyclohexaneMethy tert Butyl Ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2 pentanone(MIBK)Methylene chlorideStyrene1 1 2 2 TecrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1 2 4-Tnchlorobenzene1 1 1 Tnchloroethane1 1 2 TnchloroethaneTnchloroetheneTnchlorofluoromethaneVinyl chloridem p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylene (total)
USEPA Drlnkt^ WMITMCL or Rtak Sued
CoacMnoea
610*58080
8519001000
5110*3680
190NA0280
000075*600180*
75350*800*
57701005
044044*700
59000*1500
NA<5/00»5500*26
2000*41*too
0053*5
10007020055
1300*2
NANA
10000
PAAct2.Gn^W UrMSCNta-RoMntfU. IM Aqriftr)
100005
808010
58004100
5100900803
NA0280
00560060075
1000HO57701005
NANA700
170000NA
2300100000
NA20410
5100035
10007020055
20002
NANA
10000
PS-04
1/3/2005
PS l 010305<200<-10<2o<80<40
< '00<40<'0<20<10<->o<20
< IOO< 00<20<40<->o<20<20
< IOO<20<20I 7 9 J34609 7 J<20<20<20<20<ioo<ioo<40
<ioo< IOO<20
< IOO<40
< IOO<203090<20
< IOO<c2032
I 340<ioo<20<20<20<20
PS-07
in/2005PS 7 OI0305
9 I B< I< I< 4< 2
< 10<< I< I< I< I< I< 5
< 10< I< 2< I< I< I< 5< I< I< I139< I< I< I< I< I< 5< 5< 2< 5<5< l< 5< 2<5< l
l»3 J< I<5< I< I
6 2 J<5< I< l< I< l
PS-*71/3/200S
DUPOI0305PS< 10< I
< I
< 4
< 1
< 10<
< 1< 1<: 1< 1< 1< 5
< 10< 1< • >< 1< 1< 1«;5<: 1< 1< 1184< 1< 1< I< 1< 1< 5< 5< 2<5< 5< I<5< 2<5< 1
446J< 1<5< 1< 1
129J<5< 1< 1< 1< 1
PS- Itl/3/">005
PS-IO OI03O5
S 6 B< 1< 1< 4
<
< 10
<
< 1< I< 1< 1< 1< 5
< 10< 1< 2< 1< 1< 1< 5< 1< 1< l31
< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 5< 5< 2< 5< 5< 1< 5< 2< 5< 1•>40< 1< 5< 12 356< 5< 1< 1< 1< 1
Notes.J estimated value (below PQL)B not detected substantially above level in field blanks
USEPA Region ffl Risk based Concentration (April 2003) in italicsFreon 113 1 1,2 tnchloro-1,2 2 tnfluoroethane
< less than
Table2 PDB VOC Results DV xls Page 1 of I
0 Bnen A Cere Engineers Inc7/I3M5
![Page 46: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Table3Natural Attenuation Indicator Parameter! in Crowd WaierMW Manu/acturtnf Supertax! Sn> V alley Towwfcip, PA
Well orPiezometer
DUNN-07
DUNN-08DUNN-09
)UNN-09 (DUP;DUNN-09
DUNN 11MW-01MW-01MW-02MW-02MW-03
MW-03MW-04MW-04
MW-05MW-05MW-06MW-06MW-07
MW-08MW-08 (DUP)
MW-09MW 12MW 13MW 15MW 15
MW 15 (DUP)MW 16MW 17MW 18MW 19MW20MW22MW 22MW25MW25MW 26MW26MW29MW30MW 30OB-02OB-OSOB-05
OB 10OB 13OB 13OB 14OB 14
WellType
1SSSSoo0SS11o0SS1I0SS1SrDDD0SoSoDDOO11
r>ssoooo0ooo
SampleD*te
12/22/200412/20/20049/15/20049/15/200412/28/200412/23/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/3O/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/20/20049/14/200412/20/2004
12/29/200412/29/200412/29/20041 2/29/200412/29/200412/28/20049/16/200412/28/200412/28/200412/21/200412/21/200412/21/200412/21/200412/22/20049/15/200412/27/20049/17/200412/27/20049/17/200412/27/2004
12/23/20049/17/200412/23/200412/29/2004
9/16/200412/28/2004
12/77/20049/16/200412/21/20049/15/200412/22/2004
Manganese
0015907
031703150439
00981<00150525
<0015< O O I 500345
00438< O O I 5
<0015<0015< O O I 5<0015<0015059103830379007890073
<001500271
0017300173
1 63004250 184
< O O I 5<0015<0015<001500189<0015<0015<0015<001S<001500183043404810337
15600430040601640124
AlkalinityTotal ajCaCOj
176215210211236144
742125158173162177158174188204129141255153152167319183145141151243225215228204148164188200138146132173182321117774221277316183192
Chloride
397121395426473<20168<20<20<20697885<J><20<20<207797982652452482741450<20144150144328663107•>12984148136
<20<20104102138<20363293<20<20<2012185329432 1
Methane
0010 1650064700529007110 103
00002200035300015
<000010018100353
<OOOOI<00001<00001<00001000415000374
1 4602660249
000089146
<0000100041
0008300086000034
000022000404
00001300019
000950014
< 00001< 0000100043
00057800756OOOOIJ00015001830022100347
0005450000220000360006700045
Nrtnte
< O O I0 19
0041003800380034
< O O I<001< 0 0 1< O O I0018004
< 0 0 1< 0 0 1<001< 0 0 1<001<001< O O I0038004
0024
<001<001<00!<00t<001<001<001<001< O O I<0010024
<001< O O I<001<001< O O I<001<001<001<001< O O I<001<00l0023<001<001<001
Nrtntt
<0 112
2.222
0791 538345459231 4
282 84 24
<0 110230 1301402635
< 0 I I32
< 0 I I<0 11<0 11
1 9293 1292
<0 11< 0 I I
3837
<0 11<0 11•cO 11
3 119
<0 11242 2
0860861523•»4
TooJNitratn(Mtnu*NhnU)
<0 1
•>•>
0831 538345459131 4• > »2844
<0 10250130 180335
<0 132
<0 1< 0 1<0 1
1 9293 1292
<0 1<0 13837
<0 1<0 1<0 13 !1 9
<0 12422
086088152,324
Sctfaa
15938831 1^99
3 2 2_513513436539 •>382381509508-n i'98666735
1 J36 136117
<20593II 101200114080668814714210283081538543 1851no628107
T4
422227338709135
81 7955129
SulfUt
< 2< 2<< i<<<< 2<< •>< 2<<< 2<< 2< 2<< • >< 2<2< 2<2<2<2< 2< 2< 2< 2<2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2<2< 2T>< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2<2< 2
T«aJOrftmicCar**a
< 11 11 111 << 11 81 5< 1
1
< 1< 1< 1
< \< I
< 1< 1< 1
41
2 2
2 4< 1353< 1< 1< 11 7< 1< 11 5< 1<: 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1955 326
11 3< 1< 1< 1
T«alIMT^MCCarte*
WOL190L<«OL5t>L<«0 JM U LUOLIV) L<80 L1 0 J
410 L
<80L
3 OL3 OL**>V.430 L320 L320 LTOO)330 1350)3401700J410
340LJ40
3 I O J530 L490 L480L500L4SOL390 L390
460L450
J40L320
3 I O L430 L370 L600 JS^L380 /ro
700 L720 L440L430 L
NoteaAll results are in mg/L0 overburden S shallow bedrockJ esomaled value (below PQL)L result is biased low< less thanDUP duplicate sampleCaCO) calcium carbonate
I intermediate bedrock D deep bedrock
T»ble3 NA DV_revued.xls Page 1 of 2
OBnen i Gere Engineers toe7/13/05
![Page 47: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Natural AUcaiutioaTaMt)
Well orPiezometer
PZ 1 ITPZ-1 ITPZ-2FTPZ3ITPZ-W1PZ-W1PZW2PZ-W2RW35SBR-4SBR-6SSP-01
SSP-01 (DUP)SSP-02SSP-05SSP 10WPZ2WPZ2WPZ3WPZ3
WellType
ssssssssDSSOosos0oo0
SunpieDM
9/16/2004I2P8/2004I2P8/200412/29/20049/15/200412T2/20049H 5/200412/22/200412P1/200412T>7/200412/29/200412/21/200412/21/200412/21/200412/28/200412/22/20049/15/200412/22/20049/16/200412/27/2004
Manfucst
<001500459020«0248
005620054004030030300192<00150702067066704940553
<0015164
0069<0015<0015
AfcJtafcyTottl**C«CO,
21920521620917319416217327917525031631424120617216819419220*
Chloride
914577<2024 1562556135147236278<20<20 '<20<20<20<2059259720
261
Meth«M
0 190 1570002000130000400005OOH001390000530000240000660012600126
00055200067
< 00001000036000058000045ooon
00550023<00 l0036<00 l<001<001< O O I0084<001004500240027091
<001<001<001< 0 0 t<001<001
Nknl*
14
4
382 2
017017021
<0 111
4 1
1 3081062111315
0230214935
TotftlN«r*tn(Nbna«.Stow)
154
382
0 170 17OJ1<0 1
1 14 I
1 3083065
3-51 5
0230214935
S«Vtte
23530730194393389817952143124•N4
<20<20<y>23430 144339838 1464
SoKUt
< 2<••<<<:<< 2<<< 2<<< 2<<•>
< 2< 2<2< 2< 2
T«M0^*cCartM
1 11 1< 14 6
< I< 1< t< 1< 1< 1
)_s•>99
31 8
< 1
< 1
< I
< 1< I
T*tyIMTIMKCwtoa
570L«»J*y>MOJ*«OLJJOLK»L' •WL6V) L
\ 0<V) J(M) LWtOL5 J O L310
«OL450 L430 L450 L460
Notts.All results are in mg/LO overtutden S shallow bedrock I mtennediate bedrock D deep bedrockJ esomaled value (below PQL)L result is bvaaed low< leu thanDUP duplicate sampleCaCOj calcium carbooaie
Table3 NA DV_revised xli Page 2 of 2
OBnen A Gere Engineers Inc7/13/05
![Page 48: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Table 4Mauses Creek Stream Flow Measurements
MW Manufacturing Superfund Site Valley Township PA
STATION
Station A
Station A
Station B
Station B
Station B
Station CStation C
Station A
Station B
Station B
Station CStation C
Station A
Station BStation C
Station A
Station BStation C
JAN2002
Alternate
Alternate #1
Alternate #2
Alternate
2003
Alternate
Alternate
2004
2005
5531
3676
4300
48295387
NMNM
NM
2770
1 9412656
3308
49413862
FEB MAR
NM 27 770
NM 19820
38317
NM
8 893 26 7839216 34662
9750 37312-
1 949 NM
1 846 NM1 820 NM
4-«v
APR
9950
7888
8043
15880
5725
5480
55507583
NMNMNM
MAY
16081
15184
1538725262
3440
4 150
3692
NMNMNM
JUN
9384
1052110009
8886
6434
62914989
4730
NMNMNM
JUL
9333047
1 497
1 447
402
NM
NM
NM
NMNMNM
AUG
206
257401430
656
3897
4353
3696
NM
NMNM
SEP
4600
5 134
6664
6420
^
5570
3832
4507
1 673
1 1552097
OCT
9808
7268
10215
32853
25969
34564
NM
NMNM
NOV
30077
30265
3338936 100
8429
9315
9811
NMNMNM
DEC
5488
4786
5413
6458
2770
1 941
2656
3498
47776 185
Notesall measurements in gallons per minute (gprn)
Measurement points designated as Alternate used to verilyinitial measurements or avoid obstructions in stream channel
NM no measurements taken this monthError of 12 98% calculated for Station B September 2004
Error of 7 15% calculated for Station C December 2004(Error calculations are based on How meter accuracy of 2% and distance measurement accuracy of 0 I fcxx)
O B irn A ( nr tnfiiui i ITjble4 Stream Flow xli
![Page 49: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Table 5Summary f Surf a c Water Analytical Raulu VOCi
MW Minuficlu i g S perfund Sue V (ley Towiuh p PA
Analyle
lUbfttl Oftflitt C^M^ tt|M|HD|MED " j
Ac loneienz3 mod hloromethuicJr mof nn
Bromomethane2 B lan nc (MEK)Carbo di IfideCaibo teinchJondeChlorobenzcneChloroclhaneChlocofonn^hiuromelhaiicCyclohcxanc1 2 D bromo-3 chlor propane[>ibromochlofoine(hanc1 2 Dlb omoeUl1 2 DichJorobeox oe1 3 Dichlorobeiuene1 4 Dlchlor benzeneD hi rodfl at methane1 1 Dichloroethtne1 2 DichlococUune1 1 Dichloroethe e
I 1 2 D hloroclhIrani 1 2 Dl hloroethen1 J D hloropropanc i 1 3 D hlorop opeUan 1 3 Oi hloropropcncElhylbenzeneFeo 1132 He onliopr pylbc z ncM Ihyl AceuieMclnylcy lobe anMethyl ten B lyl Elbei (MTBE)4 M Ihyl 2 pe la unc<MlBK)Meinylene chlorideSiyre e1 1 2 2 TelrachlufocthancT irachJofoethcT luene1 2 4 Tn hlorobcnienc1 1 1 Tmhlorocthaoc1 1 2 T >chlofoe4banfn hlorocthencTrKbkHofl arumc4AaaeV yl Morukcnp Xykneo-XylcncXylcAC ( oull
Peniayl anla Water QualityC lie la
Continuous
w86000
130NS370
55003200NS560240NS390NSNSNSNSNS16069150NSNS
3 1001500NS
1 4002200
6161510NSNSNSNSNSNS
SUOO«*»
NS210I4O33026
6106104V)NSNSNSNS
10
M rtaum
450000640NS
1 80028000230000
NS28001200NS
1900NSNSNSNSNS820350730NSNS
151)007500
NS6100II 000
310JIO
2900NSNSNSNSNiNS
26 DUO11000
NS1 000700
1700IHJ
31)00)400JM»
HiNSNiNS
1 100
SWOI9/13/2004
< 10< |< l<4<2
< 10< 2< l< l< 1< 1< 1<5
10< 1< 2< l< l< 1<5< 1< 1< 1
111
11
< 55255
< 15251
0»3 j
1511151111
S W O I1/3/2005
< 10< 1< 1< 4<2
< I O< 2
1< l< 1< 1< 1
< 10< 1< 2< l< )< 1
5< 1< 1< 1
1< 1
< l1
55255151511
5
1t5I111
SW029/13/2004
< I O1
< l
<2< 10
2< 1< 1< I< l< l<5< I O< 1< 2< 1< 1< 1< 5< 1< 1< |
36< 1< 1
11
<5<i
2< S
515
< 251
95< 1
51
067)11)
51111
SW-021/3/2005
< I O< 1< 1
<2< 10
21
< 1< 1< l< 1< 5
< 10< 1< 2< 1< l
15
< 1< 1< 1171
1< 1< 1< 1< 1
55255
< 5< 2
51
)57< 1
511
9651111
SW039/13/2004
< 10< 1< 1
<2102
< l< >< 1< 1< 1
• C I O< 1
2< 1< l< 1
5< 1
1< 1402< 1< 1
1< 1< 1
5525
51
< 1251
72 7 L
< 51
122)
J< 1
11
SW-031/3/2005
< I O< 1< 1
<2< 10< 2
1<1< 1< l•cl< 5
< 10< l
2< 1< l< 1
5< 1< 1< 120 «
1
< 11
< 1552
< S515251
5451511
n5
iii
SW049/13/2004
< 10< l< 1
4<2
< 10<2< 1<1< 1< l< 1<5
< I O1
<2< 1< l
151
< 11
3051
< 1< l
11
< 5525515251
55415
016)161
51111
SW 04 (d p)9/I3/2U04
< 10< 1< 1< 4<2
< 10< 2
1< 1< 1< 1<5
<10< 1
< 2< 1< 1< 1
5< 1
11
31111115i2551\
25
561151
O K I17
51111
SW 041/3/2005
< I O1
< 1<4
2< 10< 2< 1< l< 1
1< 1<5
< 10< 1
2
< 1- 1
5< 1
11
16< 1< 1
1115
52551\
251
4O 111\11
9151111
SW 04 (d p1/3/2005
10114
<2102
< 1< l< 1< l< 1< 5
< 10< 1
2< 1< 1< 1<5< 1< 1< 116
< 111115425
51\)51
)»91511
9651111
SW-059/I3/201M
SW051/3/2005
<5055
<2010
<50< 10< 5<5<5
55
<25<50
510
< 5< 5
525
< 555
it 155
< 555
252510252552510255
1 Mil5
255
7167
)5555)
10114
<2< 10
2< 1< 1< 1
< 1< 5
< I O121
< 115
< 1< 1
1
11111
< 5521
515
251115111)1111
Nulu.I I nuicd lu Ibclo*L I biaxd lo«U 004 J ctlcil tubUA lly bu IK
I con I I ) II hlulu I 2 2 U II uioNS
![Page 50: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
SVOO —< «7».
AMljU
2 4 6-TrKhtorjfteol
1 tDmrtivifiooi
2 4-DuoirocoJueBe6-DuDmxoJueae
2-Chlonxa(iMi^cne2-Olloioptenol2 MRhytapUukne2 Methv^phml2 Nitrouihoe2 NuroeAenol3*4-M«hy1pliei»l3] DichJorobeoiidine3 NimMnUine4 6-Dimm>-o-cre3ol
4XHoro-3 mediyl phenol4-ChfccOMiiile4-Chlorophe yi pheoyl etfaer4-NanMoUuie-Nitrophenol
AceMptoykne
AadncneAnzmeBeauUebydeBenuX )«Mhnua.BennX IpyiaieBeanKbAionatamBemo<|Ju)pefytet*Beaux kMbonnheaeba(2-Chloroedio y)nednxbuO-ChlonxaliyOahefbn<2-Chkmiioprcf)yl)etfaerbo<2 E*yt« yDptiltiibieButyl benzyl ptuhibdCiprolKamC»teotedry**.Dtoazo(iJi)anltnx8c
Dnhyi ptotubKDm>rtw<F*i*»litt
Di n-octyl phtbalM
=Uwrene
H xjcfakmtwudieae•1 ucbJorocyctopemdieDC
H achJoroettuneInJenoU.- 3-cd)p>raiesophorme
NaphHuttneNitrobenzeneN NitnMO-di-B-pujvyiiiiiiaeN Nmwoipboiytamint
Phenol•ytrae
r MMH*i ffJMgm!**.uflknowToolTE So»V<*cie
Araclor 1016MoctalZZlArockr 1232Araclor 1242Anxlocl 4<*Lnctcrl254Mcctor 1260
Q»*T
NS91V4013013032000
NS110NSNSSS
1600NSNSNS165*30NSNSNS470NSNSNSNSNSNS01NSNSNSNSNS
6000NS91035NSNSNSNSNS80050021NS40NSNS2112
NS210043110NS»NS1
NSNS
*I-«J*
0014001400140014001400140014
Crtort.Mum
NS4401700MO66016009*>NS560NSNSNS
NOONSNSNSSO270160NSNSNS
2300NSNSNSNSNSNSOJNSNSNSNSNS
30000NS
4JOO140NSNSNSNSNS
40002300110NS200NSNS10s60NS
10000140
4000NS300NSJ
NSNS
F«—*<«H
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
9/13/2004SW 1 09I1O4
NANA
NANANANANANANA
NANANANANANA
NA, NA
NANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANA
NANA
NANANA
NANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANANA
NANANA
NANANA
NANA
J
ND0
052052
<052OJ2OJ2
<0il052
SW.OIWI6/2004
SW 1 M| jo,
J 55J555522_2_2
555J2J5 55J5JS-S5355222.25-55.5
25522-2
1135125J5J121212122.21212121212122.2121255122J2.22J221222J
225512222_
2-2225522225322
ND0
NANANANANANANA
SW-OII/V2005
S» I OIOJ05
5 1n5 15 12022
5 15 12
5 15 15 15 15 15 1M2
5 15 12
5 13)
25 12
5 13 122222222222222
5 12222222
205 1
2222
51202
5 12
ND0
05<05< 0 5
03<OJ
03
SW-02V1V30M
sw miv»
NANANANA
NASANANANANANANANANA
NANA
NA
NANAVA
NANANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANANA
NANA
NANANANA
NANANANANANANA
NANA
NANANANANA
NANANANANANANANA
ND0
034<OJ4
0-540340.54034
rw-o:VIV3B4
SW 0»I«W
!»
> t5 «U
ai
t t;t
!»
;»16I t
5«
6>2
)65t
;t2
56
565i2J2 212122-21212-2122212^2-22256J22
2
n5 6
2
2 212
21 56
222
5622
ND0
NANANANANANA
SW-021/V3003
1)1)a
55
51!11<X
f5
53>
I5
552!
22
22212
1
2
2
205
2520
52
ND0
0310310.310-310.51031
NOKI; eununlntoe(belo»PQL)L raUJ noB rnnND ax detected (no PQLitpcrad wife TIC*)NS
qu tan miy be
TiMe6 Suifrce Wier SVOC ill Fife I of 3
O ftrvjt A C Efifo* n, /w
![Page 51: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
—4 6-Tnchk»Dtjda»4
2 6-DummtueDB
2-dkjcoptew*
2 Ndrtwnhae
33 DKhtoro&enndm3 NapcwuJmc4 6-DuatrD-o-craot
tcw££3^^
SSC"^*-A«I .J|>»UIM
AnuvBaukkhyde
Bom* Ipym.Beartbttkunaln.
bu<2-Oiloncitaoi;)anlimtrua-CUoroahyfltlhtr
S"DtemcAniDnfcytpfcMM
DKMCtyl pbMBI
HeudUontaium
HexjcUoncyctopcaadicaBHcuchtonntnc
jophonne
N Nim»o-ilMi-tiiuinlM»»
Ftaoi>«-.ph^ ^HKlE^ ^ ^ ^ ^M^ ^Hfi
Tool 1C Sam- Vote*^•jmpH t fff Hff"Aroctor 1016Anckxl221Arock* 1232Arelar 1242
A^EI™Aractor 1260Nan1 atm«td vita (below PqU
UJ ntt iklrrmt. | liiiala
O— »T
NS91340130130320200NS110NSNSNS
1600NSNSNS16
30NSNSNS470NSNSNSNSNSNS01NSNS
NSNS
6000NS91035NSNSNSNSNSMM50021NS40NSNS21
12NS
2100
110NS59NS1
NSNS
gSHk4jUJ
001400140014001400140014
•jrbcncain
Crterfc
NS4601700MO6601600940NS560NSNSNS
1000NSssNS
160
NSSSss
2300SSNSNSNSNSNSOJNSNS
NSNS
30000NS
4500140NSNSNSNSNS
40002500110NS200NSNS105toNS
10000140
4000NS300NS5
NSNS
P*" " W
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
IB Of OOpKCl
•1 3/2004
SANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASA
ISA
SANASANANANANANASANANANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
ND0
<053<053
033OJ3
<053
SW.03«I6/2004
12
it)4
5 4
2224
54
5 4
245 45 4
5 45 4!454a
54
5 42 25 412
2125 4
245 45 42-22-22-2
2-22-2
222-2
24245 42424241422
242
a51222
<2224225422
5424
ND0
NANANANANANANA
SW-OT1/3/3005
i
5
11111
J11J 255 25 2
',
i5215-
1
1152115 254111111
111111
1111111111521111111111112 1
215 21111il111152212 1521 \
ND0
OJ03
OJOJOJOJ
JW-04V1V20D4
SASASANASASANANANANASASASANA
SASASA
SA
SASANASASASANASANANANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAHA
NANANANANANASANA
5 J5 1
0.56036
<OJ»OJ6OJ«056056
V1V20X
NANANASANANANANANANANANANANASASA
SANA
SA
SANAMAMASASANASANANANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASANANANASANASANA
., NA» NA
NANANANA
ND0
OJ7057OJ7OJ7OJ7
<OJ7057
^
145 3
< 5
22
) i
1 !) i
1
,,
. .
U5 J_25 55 5244
24
141424242412242 224245 524244
24
24
51
24242424S.S22225J24
ND0
NANANANANANA
NDNS nomndiid
IrtlTXU)
SUI«K> WKf-SVOCi ib I>iC>2of3O 8nr* 4 Girt Enfute fur
![Page 52: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Anijm
1 1 Botany!
2 4 6-TnchlonJptaoi2 4-Dictik>row«T»l
2 4-OmmiDkiaie
2-CWon»iaoM>»kr«''-CUanpfaetnl
2 MabvluiibhifeK2 Meftytpbenoi
NnnMaihae
3 3 DKhkxobeazxiiae
4 6-Duuoo-o-crtsol4-Bnanophenyt ptaiyl star
-CUoromlme
4-NimJUihae
AcejuptaheneAceaaptahyteaeAceiopbeooaeAiuhnceneAmztneBauUehydeBom* laobraxacBenzot feyracBeozo<b)f»ioni»hegeBenodJulpcrytaeBeauxk)fluanolfaeaebntt-auoroono ypgeduncbtl<2-Cllk»oe*iynelher
bo<2 Ediyfee yOpMhalaB
.apl'Obctan
CarfcazofeCtoyieneD4auaUiHnd»ica»
DirdiylptilbalaleDimethyl pMhalattDi-o-tatyl pnthalucDi o-octyi poihalaleFlucnniheDe•luafeiie•1 achlorobenzeiie
H xacbjorofeutadjeoe
H KhloroettuK
boptonxieNipAttsUeoc'JnTobfflji m
Pagd»><y 1
Phenol
Toot TIC Scm-VolaBje
Aicckr 1016Anxla-1221Aroctor 1232Arockr 1242Aicckx 1 aAn>clorl2M
PlBB^ytral
O»*7
KS91WO
130
130320200
N5noNSNSNS
1600NSNSNS165430NSNSNS470NSNSNSNSNSNS01NSNSNSNSNS
6000NS910J5NSNSNSNSNS100SOD21NS40NSNS21
12NS
21004]110NSS»NS
1NSNS
0014001400140014001400140014
:riMri>
NS•4017006606601600WONS560NSNSNS
8000NSNSNSJO270160NSNSNS
2300NSNSNSNSNSNSOSNSNSNSNSNS
30000NS
4500140NSNSNSNSNS
40002500110NS200NSNS10560NS
10000140
4000NS300NS5
NSNS
NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
"16/2004CAJTCBiMi*
! 75 75 75 723132.35 75 72.35 7575 75 75 7
*"232J575 72 35 72J2-32.35 723575 72.31.32.32.323232.3132.311131313135 7
<1313132313131313235713
<132313135 723
< 2 35715
NO0
NANANANANANANA
SW-041/3/2005
•w -» oioxo
!2515.252212 12 15.25-2115 252525 25.2
<521
2.155.2
1SI21
111522 15-25.2
<ll11111111111111117,1
<ll11_l
11< 5 2
111111212 1
12 1
121522 11111
<ll215J212 15-221
ND0
031OJ1OJ1
<0-!1<OJ1
051
1/V2005DUTO10KB
5 25 25 25
111115 251155 2525 2552
1•il5 25 2115221.111S 2115 25211111111111111111111111111115 2111111112 12 12 111
I52111111112 15221115211
NO0
<0510.5 1OJ10510.5 1051
rw-mWl 3/3004
rw 5 a*iv»
NANA
AA
AAAAAAAA
NNNS<4HNANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASANANANANANANANANANA
ND0
053OJ3031033051053
rw-as *«HMDM
r* i <Kna4
;t!•11!»2
5*5 42-2545 616!4!656
5tt,
56
11254125t5612122_
U2_112UUIS12U12I_125612121212121212122*t
12
12125622125611
NO0
NANANANANANA
I»«i/ioaas
sw i iiaxs
121616141622
1616-!
1 66
1»16
6t,
616
1 6
a
U56
1616_2
2-2-2
12UU_2_J
U12_2
-21256_2
2.2.2-22
_2
2
221»U
' U
122
5622125611
NO0
052OJ2032052052052
NanI esumMed vikM (below PQL)LUJ Unu may be nwcunte or nnpnca
ullyibowND not deeded (no PQL reporttd wvfa TX>)NS no
TabM Surface Wner SVOC Pife3of3
0 Bnt* AC rt Enf ottrr for7//JXJ5
![Page 53: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
MW Manuficmnnt; Supertund S (t ViJky T oiuftip PA
AnmJyte
M<*t,<*L>
Aluminum
Antimony
Aneiuc
lanum
Beryllium
r^rimii|m
^alctuni
rhronuuni
•fex Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
ran
Lc*d
^•CTKTT1'1^
tfangttCM
Mercury
Nickel
^ouuium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
fMurrmmamfmtat .T til PhosphorusTola! PhosphorusT ul Suspended Solids
Crtert*Continum
NS
220
150
4 100
NS
NS
10
19
03
NS
1
on
NS
46
NS
NS
13
100
NS
NS
Mutan
NS
1 100
340
21000
NS
NS
16
95
03
NS
1
14
NS
NS
NS
65
510
NS
NS
D
DTDTDTDTDTDTD1DTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTD
DTD
D
9/13/3)04SW 1 091304
<200< 5< 5< 5
5<200
<200UJ<5
< 5<4 '
< 4
3760037600< 10< 10
<005<005<50<50<2S<25255
<100<3<3
986010200417446< 0 2< 0 2<40<40
<5000<sooo
<5<:5
< 10< 101910019600< 10
10<50<50<20514
<007<007
< 4
1/3/2005SW 1 010305
<2oo200
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 5
<200200
<s54
4
23800-2SOO
10< 10005
<005<50<50<25<2S169
< 100< 3< 3
68006470313259< 0 2<OJ<40<40
<50005000<5< 5< 10< 101070011 100< 10
to50
<50<20<20
<005<005
< 4
sw-oj9/13/2004SW 2 091 504
SW-02\nnoaiSW 2 OIOXH
<200< 200
5< 5< 5< 5
< 200200 UJ
5< 5
4
< 4
3940038600< 10
< 10
005
<005<50<50<25<25196100
< 3< 3
10600101002S4-54< 0 2< 0 2<40<40
<5000<5000
< 5< 5< 10< 101900019000< 10< 10<50
J <5°<20<20
<007< 4
<yt>< SB
5< 5< 5< 5
<2003)0
5< 5< 4
4
2510023900< 10< 10
<005<005<50<50<23<25178
< 100< 3< 3
726969102623 1< 0 2<0-2<40<40
<5000<5000
< 5< 5
10< 101080010900< 10< 10<50<50<20<20
<005< 4
SW4»
9/IV7004SW 3 091 KM
swx»I/V20Q5SW 1 OlOKtt
200
2005
5
55
200
300 UJ5
54
4
4190041600
10
10
<005<005<50
50<2S
<23
< 100
100
< 3< 5
11)00
11800
191
236
< 0 2
< 0 2
<40<40
<5000<5000
< 5< 5< 10< 101870018900
1010
<50<50<20374
f
<007
KM
ya»i)^
3X1ya
•,*4
4
•70UO-fWO
10
10
0050 J
50
»
-5J 73«7
100)
< )r i n)I I t\J
31 3227< 0 2< 0 2<40
40
5000< WOO
5
5
10
10
11200
11600
1010SO
50
20.548
<0057
SW-04*IVTDD4
SW4 0*1104
sx3D\
*DO
J» LI
4
4
4^000<MUQ
010
005005
50X>J25
150100
< 33
1160011400203194
0 2
0
40
<40
sooo<000!
J
10
10
1800017900
101050
50
J, 1
30 1
<0(77
Noto.NS aonandinl.
suadant depeodi on pH or other waBr-qnibty coodiooaalio sampled on 9/I6AM far ibon hokt-amc paimmtlen
J ^mm.t~< thie (below PQL)
L rEull u biased lowUJ not -frtfTtT** quannucon 1 nut may be
inaccurate or impreciseB oot 'V*f-M«j flifr«««*naiiy above level in Geld blanks
T Total D Dissolved
Tabte7 Surface Water Melalsjils Pitt lotO Bnm iO f 11* If
7//J/O5
![Page 54: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
of Svfect Waur Analytical Rente Sfaofc.
MW Manufacun I Supcrfund S * Vilky Towndup PA
TSS
Ansrjrtt
Motto fft/U
Aluminum
Antimony
Anemc
lanum
Jery Uium
'•ftmiurp
Calcium
Chromium
lex Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
run
Lead
"^IWTVf^ym
bl ngf*****
Mercury
Nickel
*otusium
>elemum
Silver
Sodium
Thiilium
Vuudium
Zinc
rotal nuuphonuTotal PtxapooraTool Suspeaded Sobdi
P«M»ytT»Dfa Wiur QualityCrrurt.
Coodnooai
NS
120
150
4100
NS
NS
10
19
03
NS
1
077
NS
46
NS
NS
13
100
gM**^
NS
NS
MUBDOBI
NS
1 100
340
21000
NS
NS
16
95
03
NS
1
14
NS
NS
NS
65
510
NS
NS
DTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTDTOTDTDTDTDTDTOTDTnTDTO
D
SW-049/13/2004DUT091304
<200< 200< i< s< 5
5200
<200UJ< 5< 5< 4
< 4
4290042300< 10< 10
<005<005<50<50<23<23179
< 100< 3< 3
1180012000251161
<02< 0 2<40<40
<5000<5000
< 5< 5<10< 1018700I8SOO< 10
10<50<5029326
<007<007
4
SW-04/3/2005
SW-4 01030)
<2OO<200< 5< 5
55
<200200
55
< 4
< 4
140027200< 10< 10
<005<005<50
50<2351 3140
< 100< 3< 379»7(4023 1219<02<oa<40<40
<SOOO<5000
< 5< 5
< 10< 101070011600< 10
10<50
. <50<20<20
<005<005
4
SW.04/3/2005
DUTO10305
<MOSO
55
< 55
<3»MO
554
4
27900ttoo< 10< 10005OOi
<50<50
23<23142100
3< J
11107740234
1 4< 0 2< 0 2<40<40
<50005000< 5< 5
< 10< 101100011300< 10
10<50<50<20<20
< 005<005
< 4
SW-03WI3/2OX5W 5 09IXM
10400200
5555
200SOU
554
4
5970059500
1 5 2< 10005
<0055050
94223
19*00< 100
103< J
1930019300mo4(702
< 0 2<40<40
<50005000< 5< 5
< 10< 10
< 50005000
1010
<50<50294J5
0 14<007
611
SW-03/V20»
SW 1 010305
n«x3JO
?;
195
-51SB
5s
!4
(43X15 WOO
3)0
005005
5150
"770J
26400100
2273
20100163004200172
< 0 2<02<40<40
<5000<5000
57 5
< 1010
50005000
1010
<5050
770<»
0 N<005
IZ20
Notei.NS oa
uindad dependi on pH or Mbcr vucr-qulny coodmooiLio untried on 9/16AV1 forinon bold-ome pmmetai
J ntumttd vtkK (bcJaw FQL)L remit u bused lowUJ not detected, quinutinon limit may be
inaccurate or imprecucB not detected subuuoally above level in field bUnkiT Total D Diuolved
Table? Surface Waier Metals xlj
O Snt* iC E g Kf
![Page 55: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
FIGURES
![Page 56: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
mooCM
*T3(X
ft
mr>n•«•in
o>
RGURE 1
•<*•in
00mCMo
V)*-ioVo"
CL
ADAPTED FROM RIVERSIDE DANVILLE WASHINGTONVILLE AND MILLVILLE PENNSYLVANIA U S G S 7 5 MIN QUADS
MW MANUFACTURING> SUPERRJND SITE
" ( VALLEY TOWNSHIP, MONTOUR COUNTY, PA.PENNSYLVANIA
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
SITE LOCATION MAP
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 MLE
JWLOMETER
FILE NO 35433001-57JULY 2005
SCALE 1 24000ENGINEERS INC
![Page 57: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
OKNBUflOCH EXIWCnON HEU.
O OKMUMXN UOMJ1OM40 HCU.
e awu» aoxocx uourcxwo
IT B A WJLATON V l/K TOK Wt PEKSOXIMISS «CIMC IMOI DC MCCTON OTAuansai BOBI. n »o» MS ooauan 1 =160
I MB W«D I /I/O. / 7/U <M>
inm. HTUD
QUID
IN CHARGE OF TAN
DESIGNED BY MTC CHECKED BY MSK
DRAWN BY RJDNO QMt REVISION INIT
ENGINEERS INC
MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUNO SITE
SITE PLAN
nu NO
3S4M001-M
DATE
JULY 2005
![Page 58: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
a o A vnuTON or uw KH AWT POBON.muss icon iMn nc onecnoN or AUCBGED BMMDl 10 «.« MS [MX1MKI
LCBEM)
BULL VALVE
RJ5W CONTROL VALVE
STATIC LiXER
FUOW OfUCNT
CCNinFUGAL PIM>
UETOaNO PUMP
AIR OPERATtD OffHKMIPUUP
ROTART L06C PUMP
BUXKER
AOOmONAL COUVMENT REO DFDR TREATMENT Of OU-SCONSTRUCTION
««TEB HOSC CONNECTION
IN CHARGE OF TAN
DESIGNED BY RJD CHECKED BY MSK
DRAWN BY MO NO DATE REVISION
ENGINEERS INC
MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUND SITE
GROUND WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
AND CONSTRUCTION WATER
TREATMENT SYSTEM
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
FVE NO
33433001-63
OMt
JULY 2005
![Page 59: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
i
/VHUOCIME HUKKIV
It E A WXAKM Or UW TOR Hit PERSON.IMtSS ACIMC tMOOl DC UHUMI OTAUOBSOI oaon n M.BI MS ooouMen
UMOI PC OH I
tuoani mMC aouok Mavec KJ. imiou» MMunciumo me" WIID1/1/01. i/i' u *• /i /w
IN CHARGE OF TAN
DESIGNED BY PKL CHECKED E>Y MSK
DRAWN BY RJDNO DATE REVISION INIT
ENGINEERS INC
MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUND SITE
OVERBURDEN GROUND WATERCONTOUR MAP
SEPTEMBER 2004
FXE NO
35433001-59
DATE
JULY 2005
![Page 60: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
I
n e A vnuim or u« n» MR POBCN.muss ncmc uaai nc MBCTOK OTAuceeo m>ra<. re «.» MS oaouHen
flux imnD »n unitiu imraf (MID
/§/». / ' J •» /I /W
IN CHARGE OF TAN
DESIGNED BY PKL CHECKED BY MSK
DRAWN BY RJDNO REVISION
ENGINEERS INC
MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUNO S(TE
OVERBURDEN GROUND WATERCONTOUR MAPDECEMBER 2004
FU NO
33433001-80
OAT!
JULY 2006
![Page 61: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
so
I
II C A VIOUIBH Of UH RM MfT POBON.IM£B HCTNC UMOOI THE OMEnM OTAuceea OCTCK. K «.« ms DOOUMWI
IN CHARGE OF TAN
DESIGNED BY MBL CHECKED BY MSK
DRAWN BY RJD NO DATE INIT
ENGINEERS INC
MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUND S(TE
SHALLOW BEDROCKGROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
SEPTEMBER 2004
FU NO
35433001-81
DATE
JULY 200S
![Page 62: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
CHUM U*
KU.
omuna aantcnx mi.
HQMHOMM miK uaMToiwa
•ILL nm noun wmamim (rr/u&XDB: 1004)
•nooanraai (IOUMI)
tCHCO VCIUNO rm Ilia w*turwc nun nunUJCAIKW (NTiaX.)
MMC WTWB" 0<MIDI VMUO UXMIOMI
gamut, omux) wm ru>
IT 0 A VUUTOI Of M» TOR Mff POTON.uuss (cms uaoi nc nccim or AUCBBO mam. n «.o MS oaouen 1 -160
«LL MC-C01MC 101 OUMI-* S AUO iOtt MD U Mlciiimioi mi uwai nc at ma»ni.
) fit wma AumiD not IMHOID arc mj*rr
/•/M. / 7^U MO
IN CHARGE OF TAN
DESIGNED BY_PKL CHECKED BY MSK
DRAWN BY RJD NO O»TE REVISON INIT
ENGINEERS INC
MW MANUFACTURING SUPERFUNO SfTE
SHALLOW BEDROCKGROUND WATtR CONTOUR
DECEMBER 2004MAP
FU NO
39433001-62
OATt
JULY 2006
![Page 63: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III
1650 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029
SUBJECT
FROM
TO
MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteFive- Year Review Report
Peter W Schaul,Remedial Office
Abraham Ferdas, DirectorHazardous Site Cleanup Division (3HSOO)
Attached for your signature is the third Five Year Review Report for the MW ManufacturingSuperfund Site in Montour County, Pennsylvania The physical aspects of the remedial actionhave been completed in accordance with the Record of Decisions for Operable Units 1,2 3 4 5and 6 The remedy at the Site currently protects human health and the environment
I recommend that you sign the Five-Year Review Report
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine freeCustomer Service Hotline 1-800-438-2474
![Page 64: THIRD FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT For ... • CWTS Construction Water Treatment ... 1 Review perio d shoul correspon to th e actual start an en dates of Fiv Year](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032614/5b2f7d8b7f8b9a91438ce869/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III
1650 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029
SUBJECT MW Manufacturing Superfund SiteFive-Year Review Report
FROM Peter W Schaul, ChiefRemedial Branch (3HS20)
TO Abraham Ferdas DirectorHazardous Site Cleanup Division (3HSOO)
Attached for your signature is the third Five Year Review Report for the MW ManufacturingSuperfund Site in Montour County, Pennsylvania The physical aspects of the remedial actionhave been completed in accordance with the Record of Decisions for Operable Units 1 2,3 4 5and 6 The remedy at the Site currently protects human health and the environment
I recommend that you sign the Five-Year Review Report
CONCURRENCES
SYMBOL
SURNAME
DATE
3HS22
B Khona
/m^L^*\tfl<£
3HS22
B
fyA
4Nishitami "
MjoC
3HS23
J Lowe
^\^^~t>/t1/C^
•>
EPA Form 1320-1 (12-70) OFFICIAL FILE COPY
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine freeCustomer Service Hotline 1-800-438-24 74