this article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: brokaw eb, murray t, nef t,...

6
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time- independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064 Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training Elizabeth B. Brokaw, MS; Theresa Murray, BS; Tobias Nef, PhD; Peter S. Lum, PhD

Upload: ethan-jacobs

Post on 18-Jan-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI: /JRRD Motor Learning Testing 37 nondisabled subjects – 3 training groups: TIFT, visual demonstration, and time-dependent (TD) training. – Performed 8 blocks of 10 repetitions of task training with recall testing and 1 min of rest between each block. ARMin III robot and passive hand device, HandSOME, being used in functional shelf task.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064

Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted

time-independent functional training

Elizabeth B. Brokaw, MS; Theresa Murray, BS; Tobias Nef, PhD; Peter S. Lum, PhD

Page 2: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064

• Study aim– Develop time-independent functional training (TIFT), a

haptic-based approach for retraining interjoint coordination poststroke.

– Implement TIFT in ARMin III robotic exoskeleton.

• Relevance: – Abnormal interjoint coordination is common after stroke.– Recovery is possible with focused intervention that inhibits

compensatory strategies and promotes learning of proper interjoint coordination during reaching.

Page 3: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064

Motor Learning Testing

• 37 nondisabled subjects– 3 training groups: TIFT,

visual demonstration, and time-dependent (TD) training.

– Performed 8 blocks of 10 repetitions of task training with recall testing and 1 min of rest between each block. ARMin III robot and passive hand device,

HandSOME, being used in functional shelf task.

Page 4: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064

Training Results• TIFT subjects signifi-cantly

reduced errors in training (p < 0.001) but TD subjects did not (p = 0.76).

• Robot guidance torque decreased significantly across training blocks in TIFT (p < 0.001) but not TD (p = 0.67). Typical subject’s joint coordination

pattern during TIFT training. Trajectories were disjointed in 1st training block (top) but smoother by 8th training block (bottom).

Page 5: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064

Movement Recall Results• All three groups reduced

error across movement recall blocks (p < 0.001).

• Same observation for reduction of slope error (p = 0.018) and movement variability (p < 0.001).

• However, no significant between-group differences for any metrics (p > 0.20).

Error reductions during recall blocks with standard error bars.

Page 6: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):299–316. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0064

Conclusions• Can not yet recommend TIFT over more easily

implemented TD, but TIFT warrants further study:– Theoretical advantages:

• Minimally interferes with input/output map between correct muscle activation and movement.

• Allows greater kinematic variability. • Requires subjects to produce proper interjoint coordination to

advance.

– Training advantages• Lower interaction forces between robot and human arm (thus arm

contributing more to movement during TIFT). • Error and assistance forces reduced during TIFT but not TD.