those who do not know the history of their field are doomed to repeat its mistakes (santayana)

31
Those who do not know the history of their field are doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Upload: willow-terry

Post on 03-Jan-2016

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Those who do not know the history of their field are doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana). PHILOSOPHY (600BC present). BIOLOGY (15th century present). PSYCHOLOGY (2nd half of 19th century present). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Those who do not know the history of their field are doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Page 2: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

PHILOSOPHY(600BCpresent)

BIOLOGY(15th century present)

PSYCHOLOGY(2nd half of 19th century present)

Page 3: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

PRE-GREEK ZEITGEIST

People observed alternations of rhythms: day and night, seasons, famines, etc.

Awareness and recall of dreams: images of dead people, animals, composites. Concerns about the nature of things, - Cosmologies devised as explanations.

Motivation for cosmologies was not scientific, e.g., predicting eclipses, droughts, etc. That was engineering, not science.

Cosmologists formulated hypotheses about the basic units of things: - water, fire, air, earth, numbers. Pythagoras is a well known example. He believed that numbers held the secret of everything.

Page 4: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

REDUCTIONISM

Democritus was the first cosmologist to attempt to explain things by reductionism.

In about 400 BC, Democritus postulated that atoms were the basic unit of all matter and that there were two types of atoms:

-body atoms (inert)-soul atoms (vital substance)

Democritus is also credited with introducing the mind-body distinction.

Page 5: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

DYNAMIC VS. RELATIONAL COSMOLOGIES:

Dynamic (Heraclitus): Things are always in flux. Consciousness is never the same at successive points of time.

-A basic problem for all sciences: how do static units change over time?

Relational (Anaxagoras): It is not meaningful to talk about elementary units without specifying their organization. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Page 6: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

REACTIONS TO COSMOLOGIES

How do we know about reality?

-Through senses?

-Are the senses trustworthy?

Epistemology: What is the nature of knowledge?

Sophists: There is no absolute knowledge. We only know what our senses tell us.

Page 7: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Plato (Socrates?) & AristotlePlato:

Rejected relativism of Sophists and sharpened the mind-body distinction: Reason supplements what we learn through sense organs and functions independently of the senses.

The function of the soul is to apprehend ideal knowledge of the world through reason, to provide a means of going beyond the imperfect data of the senses and for defining the universals of beauty, goodness, mathematics, etc. (cf. Descartes, Kant, Chomsky).

Aristotle:Defined the empiristic point of view

[tabula rasa]. He did not accept the universals of knowledge that Plato postulated.

Page 8: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Aristotle(384 -322 BC)

Mind should be interpreted, not as a thing, but as a process. Perhaps he would prefer to say "minding" as a verb rather than "mind" as a noun. Believed that Mind was in the heart.

Page 9: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

GREEK HERITAGE

Dualism: mind vs. body: What is the nature of each entity? How do they interact? basic question of modern behavioral and cognitive psychology.

Materialism vs. Idealism:Materialists: everything is reducible to some

physical entity.Idealists: ideas exist independently of any material

substance (Descartes, Kant, Chomsky)

Nativism vs. Empiricism:Nativists: Knowledge exists independently of

experience (knowledge may be material, e.g., brain states as postulated by modern theories of in neuroscience).

Empiricists: Knowledge derives from experience. The empiricist view defines a basic question in the study of language, object recognition, etc. Behaviorists regard the concept of tabula rasa as basic.

Page 10: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

SCIENCE: ENGINEERING:

Theory of Gravitation Dropping objects at different heights

Theory of Molecular Weights Fermenting wines

Theory of Evolution Breeding race horses

Theory of Color Vision Rules of additive and subtractive color mixture

Theory of Behavior Animal training,

Mnemonics

SCIENCE vs. ENGINEERING

Page 11: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Rene Descartes (1596-1650)

The Reflex Arc

Page 12: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)
Page 13: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

The Reflex

Page 14: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)
Page 15: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Descartes

Postulated two types of substance:1. Material (body) extended substance:

Occupies Newtonian space.2. Soul (thinking) unextended matter: Does

not occupy Newtonian space.-Thinking matter, unique to man, is the seat of

innate ideas. -Body and soul interact in the pineal gland

(but do not reside there).-Animals, who have no souls are mere

automatons: mechanical robot-like creatures.

Two Cartesian heritages:-mechanical action (reflexes)-modern view of innate ideas--picked up by Kant &

Chomsky.

Page 16: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

CONCEPT OF REFLEX

CONCEPT OF THE REFLEXReflex: A correlation between a stimulus and a response. The stimulus releases the response, as pulling a trigger fires a bullet.

*Animal spirits: flowed in hollow tubes from sense organ to muscles.

*Glisson: Disproved the hypothesis of animal spirits by showing that excised muscle tissue contracts when stimulated (in a dish of saline solution). These experiments gave rise to the concept of irritability and excitability. *Concept of “Spinal mind”: suggested by results of experiment on the magnitude of the flexion reflex in frogs whose spinal cord were severed (“spinal preparation”)

*Pflüger: Inferred spinal mind because of variability in the magnitude of flexion reflex.

*Magnus: Showed that variability was due to uncontrolled shifts in posture.

Page 17: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

JOHN LOCKE

*Emphasized the basic role of experience: (1690 Essay Concerning Human Uunderstanding.)

*Resurrected Aristotle's concept of tabula rasa.

*How does tabula rasa get impressed?

*Introduced ideas as the basic unit of the mind and the concept of mental chemistry: how simple and complex ideas interact.

Page 18: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Mental Chemistry

Simple ideas (sensations).

Complex ideas (reflection, thought, perception).

Ideas can have either of the following qualities:

-Primary qualities: quantitative properties of an object (e.g., mass, motion, temperature, etc.).

-Secondary qualities: in the "eye" of the beholder (qualitative differences: colors, sounds, tastes, etc.).

Page 19: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

British School of Empiricism

Berkely: claimed that all ideas were secondary in nature. God insures stability of world because He has primary ideas.

Hume: Doubted existence of mind and God. All we have is a collection of ideas. What we must discover are the principles of association of those ideas (Aristotle), Hume proposed as principles of association (after Aristotle): resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect (temporal succession).

Hartley: Placed ideas in nervous system and hypothesized that they obey Newtonian laws.

James Mill: All ideas are reducible to simple sensory elements.

Page 20: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Ronald Knox:

There was a young man who said,God must think it exceedinglyodd if he finds that this treecontinues to be when there is no one about in the Quad.

Reply:

Dear Sir:

Your astonishment’s odd:I am always about in the Quadand that is why the tree will continue to besince observed by

Yours faithfully,

God

Page 21: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

RELEVANT DEVELOPMENTS IN BIOLOGY

*Reflexology

*Sensory physiology

*Theory of evolution

Page 22: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

SENSORY PSYCHOLOGY

Developed out of ancient concern to understand senses. Knowledge of sensory psychology was facilitated by:

- assumption that the body obeyed mechanical laws.

- advances in resolution of the microscope. - the discovery of nerves

Bell and Megendie: Discovered independently the

difference between sensory (dorsal) and motor (ventral) nerves.

Müller: How many types of sensory nerves are there? Law of Specific Nerve Energies.

Helmholtz: Hypothesized specific nerve energies for primary colors - red, green, blue.

Gall: Phrenology.

Page 23: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

TABLE OF SENSATONSeye 32,820ear ?nose 4tongue 4skin 2muscle 1tendon 1joint 3alimentary canal ?blood vessels 1?lungs 1sex organs 1ear (static sense) 1

-------

Total: 44,435(From E. B. Titchener “An Outline of

Psychology”, NY: Macmillan, 1896 pp. 74-75.

Page 24: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

PSYCHOPHYSICSSensory psychologists often asked subjects to make judgments. This gave rise to various mathematical generalizations about sensory function.

Weber’s Law: ∆I/I = K [DIFFERENCE THRESHOLD]

I = Physical magnitude of stimulus∆I = Physical magnitude of change needed to

produce a just noticeable difference (jnd)

K = constantFechner’s Law: S = Klog I

S = Subjective magnitude of stimulusI = Physical magnitude of stimulusK = constant

Stevens Law: S = KIn

S = Subjective magnitude of stimulusn = exponent whose value varies with sense

modality K = constantI = Physical magnitude of stimulus

Page 25: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Charles Darwin

Theory Of Evolution

Three aspects relevant to psychology: - Variation - Continuity of Structure - Functionalism

Page 26: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

“We have seen … [that] man bears in his bodily structures clear traces of his descent from some lower form; but it may be urged that, as man differs so greatly in his mental power from all other animals, there must be some error in this conclusion....It can be shown [that] there is no fundamental difference of this kind. We must also admit that there is a much wider interval in mental power between one of the lowest fishes, as a lamprey or lancelet, and one of the higher apes, than between an ape and man; yet this interval is filled up by numberless gradations. ” (Darwin, 1871/1982a, p. 445 )

Page 27: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

VARIATION

Charles Darwin and his disciple Herbert Spencer, argued that the logic of variation and selection also applied to behavior. Note the similarity with respect to the logic of reinforcement theory.

Galton: Observed that intellectual ability varied between individuals (just as structural features vary). -Asked how can variation of intellectual ability be measured? -Argued for sensory ability as a measure of intelligence. -Experiments on individual differences led to development of I.Q. and other psychological tests.

-Assumed that intelligence is innate.

Page 28: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATIONS

Examples of Continuity of Biological Structure:-eyes -breathing apparatus-digestive systems-camouflage -musculature

Comparative psychologists ask, is there continuity of mental ability and consciousness between animal and man?

Modern examples of continuity: a. instincts - study of ethology b. reflexes - conditioned & unconditioned reflexes

Clever Hans

Morgan’s Canon of Parsimony

Page 29: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

Clever Hans

Page 30: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

FUNCTIONALISM

Darwin: Structures are adaptive because they assume a certain function.

-Search for structure can be facilitated by studying function.

-Structure can be inferred from function, e.g., research in physiological psychology.

William James: What is the function of consciousness? That topic is central to modern psychology.

Page 31: Those who do not know the history of their field are  doomed to repeat its mistakes (Santayana)

PLATONEWTONHARVEY

DESCARTES

REFLEXOLOGYSENSORY PSYCHOLOGYTHEORY OF EVOLUTION

BRITISH EMPIRICISMINTROSPECTIONPSYCHOPHYSICS

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY