thrace amateur astronomy club (t.a.a.c.)iris.med.duth.gr/.../05/...iceri_2008_presentation.pdficeri...
TRANSCRIPT
Astronomy Education for the Public via Emerging Internet Technologies ICERI 2008
P. Antoniou , E. Delidou, A. Aggeioplasti, E. Kaldoudi
Thrace Amateur Astronomy Club (T.A.A.C.)
Thrace Amateur Astronomy Club (T.A.A.C.)
Founded 2004
• 3 Astronomy related speeches from distinguished invited speakers to the public
• 20 presentations at local schools
• 2 semester long projects of astronomy education for children
• Weekly member presentations of astronomical subjects to the Club’s members
• 20 Organized observations of the sky open to the public with emphasis on site accessibility
• 20 Organized observations of the sky for the members with emphasis on site quality
• Innumerable observations of the Club’s members
Target Audience: General Public
Project “Tackling astronomy, one problem at a time”
Aim: Disseminating basic astrophysics and astronomy knowledge
Interesting subject
Interesting approach
Cater for diverse participants’ Time requirements
Cater for diverse participants’ locations
Practical Requirements:
Course constraints Problem based educational paradigm
Asynchronous participation
Remote participation
objectives
support collaboration of remote astronomy experts (amateurs
and professionals) in order to devise, develop and deploy
didactic problems for problem based learning in astronomy;
deploy problem-based sessions in virtual teams, where both
students and instructors may be located in remote places;
support strong instructor’s presence in a PBL episode;
provide tools for student inquiry and collaboration;
provide mechanisms for continuous monitoring and
evaluation, that would address direct knowledge, as well as
tacit competencies targeted via PBL
Problem Based Learning (PBL)
“PBL is focused, experiential learning organized around the investigation, explanation, and resolution of meaningful problems”
Hmelo Silver, Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16; 3 (2004)
“PBL is an instructional (and curricular) learner-centered approach that empowers learners to conduct research, integrate theory and practice, and apply knowledge and skills to develop a viable solution to a defined problem. Critical to the success of the approach is the selection of ill-structured problems (often interdisciplinary) and a tutor who guides the learning process and conducts a thorough debriefing at the conclusion of the learning experience.”
J.R. Savery, Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions IJPBL, 1;1 (2006)
Components of Problem Based Learning
Learner Group
•Self directed towards learning resources
•Self regulated regarding depth and breadth of inquiry
•Collaborating to bring together diverse knowledge
•Largely independent of Teacher
Problem
•Motivating the group
•Complex in order to provide a challenge to the group
•Ill structured so as not to enforce single course of action
•Open ended in order to not have one correct answer
Facilitator
•Expert educator instead of expert in the field of knowledge
•Guides learners instead of providing knowledge
•Challenges learners to justify their thinking
•Assists in Collaboration
Problem based learning: Attractive for the public
• Learners have the responsibility for their own learning
• The ill-structured problem used in problem-based learning allows for free inquiry.
• Diverse and multidisciplinary learning experience
• PBL fosters collaboration.
• Immediate feedback from newly acquired knowledge in the form of solid answers to previously encountered unsolved questions
• PBL utilizes activities valued and carried out in the real world (research, experimentation, independent thinking, etc.)
Implementing PBL for a diverse audience
Collaboration
Facilitation
Publication
PBL requirements Audience requirements
Asynchronous participation
Site independent participation
Ease of access to resources
Ease of use of publication tools
Web 2.0 Technologies
What’s wrong with Web 1.0 ?
User as a recipient User as a contributor
Publishing Participation
Scripted content Emergent behavior
Rigid software solutions Open-ended customizable modular technologies
Software irrelevant of the user Software improved through user participation
Publishing and linking data Harnessing collective intelligence
User contribution a chore User contribution transparently aggregated
Web 1.0 Web 2.0
Web 2.0 by example
Modular open ended modifiable software Web services
P2P sharing Decentralized resources, gets better the more people use it
Google The service is the product (Web as a platform), gets better the more people use it
Blogs Reinforces participation, collaboration and community making
Wikis Reinforces participation, easily aggregates user contribution
problem based learning via web 2.0
develop educational problem in a wiki – various remote teachers can collaborate
initiate discussion via problem’s blog/forum
students search for solution/knowledge via the web (and not only)
students collaborate to solve the case via wikis
activities & progress in achieving scientific competences & skills are recorded & discussed in personal students’ blogs
teachers’ experiences are recorded & discussed in personal teachers’ blogs
problem based learning via web 2.0
wiki
– develop the problem (teacher collaboration)
– develop the solution (student collaboration)
forum
– discuss practical issues & background
– discuss/present the procedure
– discuss/analyze the problem
blog
– record/comment on personal experience
– record/comment on progress/competencies
Putting them all to work
Learning objectives: present basic concepts of astrophysics
Impressive stellar phenomena:
Supernova
Pulsars
Black holes
Through which concepts of stellar evolution emerge:
Phases of stellar evolution
End states of stars
Detection methods in modern astronomy
The Problem: Enlightening the press «As members of an amateur astronomy club in a rural area that lacks an appropriate Physics or Engineering department it has been delegated to you to be the unofficial “Press correspondence team”. That is to provide the local press with an unofficial but well informed statement regarding various astronomy related news and stories coming into the spotlight at various times.
For that reason you will be called upon to comment on several fictional news stories regarding astronomical observations and phenomena. Some of these stories will be of sound scientific basis while others will not. Your job is to comment on both, after you have formed an informed opinion through widely available research means (internet, libraries etc.). The ideal response should be concise, relatively brief, but well documented and researched. Remember that you are not considered a scientific authority on the subject so any non-obvious scientific knowledge should be adequately referenced. No specialized education or resources will be required to be able to adequately address the issues covered by the
articles. »
participants
students:
– 8 young amateur astronomers of the region of Thrace
– age: 12-24 years
tutors:
– 3 physisists, also amateur astronomers
–
participants’attitude towards the educational method prior to PBL deployment
PA
RT
ICIP
AN
T
Prior Knowledge Expected
Difficulty
Expectations Fears
Familiar
with
PBL
Perceived
Preference
Pb
l e
asie
r
Pb
l h
ard
er
Kn
ow
led
ge
Co
op
era
tio
n
Fu
n
Tim
e P
ressu
re
Co
op
era
tio
n
Re
so
urc
e
Ava
ilab
ility
No
ne
Y N
Conv.
Co
urs
e
PB
L
bo
th
1 X X X X X X X
2 X X X X X
3 X X - - X X X X
4 X X X - - - X
5 X X X X X
6 X X X X X X X
7 X X - - X X
8 X X X X X X
tot 1 7 0 6 2 5 1 7 4 0 5 3 1 2
participants’attitude towards the educational method after PBL deployment
PA
RT
ICIP
AN
T PBL
impressions Preference Difficulty Pros Cons
Po
sitiv
e
ne
ga
tive
Sta
nd
ard
co
urs
e
PB
L
bo
th
ea
sie
r
ha
rde
r
Sa
me
/me
d
ium
Kn
ow
led
g
e
Co
op
era
ti
on
Fu
n
Difficu
lt
access to
reso
urc
es
No
ne
1 X X X X X X
2 X X X X X
3 X X X X X
4 X X X X X X X
5 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 X X X X X X
8 X X X X X
Tot 6 0 0 4 2 4 0 2 6 2 2 2 4
participants’attitude towards web 2.0 prior to PBL deployment
PA
RT
ICIP
AN
T
Prior Knowledge Expected
Difficulty Expectations Fears
Familiar
with IT
Familiar
with web 2.0
E-le
arn
ing E
asie
r
E-le
arn
ing H
ard
er
Kn
ow
led
ge
Co
op
era
tio
n
Fu
n
Un
fam
ilia
r w
ith
So
ftw
are
Co
op
era
tio
n w
ith
Str
an
ge
rs
Re
so
urc
e A
va
ilab
ility
No
ne
Y N Y N
1 X X X X X X
2 X X X X X
3 X X - - X X X
4 X X X - - - X
5 X X X X X
6 X X X X X X
7 X X X X X
8 X X X X X X X X
tot 8 0 4 4 7 0 7 2 1 2 3 1 5
participants’attitude towards web 2.0 after PBL deployment
PA
RT
ICIP
AN
T Internet
Helpful
Clarity of
Instructions Pros Cons
Suggestion
s
Y N Y N
Know
ledg
e
Coopera
ti
on
no
ne
Learn
ing
curv
e
Rem
ote
Coopera
ti
on
None
UI
Impro
vem
en
ts
None
1 X X X X X X
2 - - X X X X
3 X X X X X X
4 X X X - - -
5 - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 X X X X X
8 X X X X X
tot 5 0 5 1 5 0 1 5 1 1 1 5
Innovation of assembly in Astronomy Education
Engaging educational instances for the public
Interesting astrophysical concepts
Problem based learning paradigm
Web 2.0 Technologies
cite as
P. Antoniou, E. Delidou, K. Aggeioplasti, and E.
Kaldoudi, “Astronomy Education for the Public via
Emerging Internet Technologies”, Proceedings of the
ICERI 2008: International Conference of Education,
Research and Innovation, Madrid, Spain, November
17-19, 2008