thrust stand measurements of a conical inductive …...thrust stand measurements of a conical...

1
Thrust Stand Measurements of a Conical Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster Ashley K. Hallock Yetispace Inc. Kurt A. Polzin NASA Marshall Space Flight Center I. INTRODUCTION Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters (iPPT) [1–3] are spacecraft propulsion devices in which electrical energy is capacitively stored and then discharged through an inductive coil. The thruster is electrodeless, with a time- varying current in the coil interacting with a plasma cov- ering the face of the coil to induce a plasma current. Propellant is accelerated and expelled at a high exhaust velocity (O (10 - 100 km/s)) by the Lorentz body force arising from the interaction of the magnetic field and the induced plasma current. While this class of thruster mitigates the life-limiting issues associated with electrode erosion, inductive pulsed plasma thrusters can suffer from both high pulse energy requirements imposed by the voltage demands of induc- tive propellant ionization, and low propellant utilization efficiencies. FIG. 1: Time-integrated, unfiltered photograph showing an axial view (along the thrust axis) of a conical iPPT operating on 60 mg/s argon with an initial capacitor bank charging voltage of 5 kV. A conical coil geometry may offer higher propellant uti- lization efficiency over that of a flat inductive coil, how- ever an increase in propellant utilization may be met with a decrease in axial electromagnetic acceleration, and in turn, a decrease in the total axially-directed kinetic en- ergy imparted to the propellant. II. EXPERIMENT Three conical inductive coils (with half cone angles of 20 , 38 , and 60 ) were constructed and operated on a thrust stand. Impulse bits were calculated from thrust data to determine how the initial charging voltage of the capacitor bank, the mass flow rate of injected propellant, and the cone angle affect the thrust of a propulsion de- vice employing a conical inductive coil in the presence of preionized propellant. A maximum in impulse bit was found with respect to coil geometry, and the mass flow rate for which the impulse bit is maximized was found to decrease with decreasing initial capacitor bank charging voltage. Dependencies on these experimental parameters are discussed in the context of previous semi-empirical modeling of the effect of inductive coil geometry on thrust efficiency [4]. III. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors appreciate the help and support of Mr. Adam Kimberlin, Mr. Tommy Reid, Mr. Douglas Gal- loway, Dr. Adam Martin, Dr. Noah Rhys, Mr. J. Boise Pearson, and Mr. Jim Martin. This work was supported in part by NASA’s Advanced In-Space Propulsion pro- gram managed by Dr. Michael LaPointe and the Office of the Chief Technologist In-Space Propulsion Program managed by Mr. Timothy Smith. [1] Polzin, K. A. Comprehensive review of planar pulsed in- ductive plasma thruster research and technology. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 27(3):513–531, May-June 2011. [2] Lovberg, R. H. and Dailey, C. L. A PIT primer. Technical Report 005, RLD Associates, Encino, CA, 1994. [3] Dailey, C. L. and Lovberg, R. H. The PIT MkV Pulsed Inductive Thruster. Technical Report 191155, Lewis Re- search Center, Redondo Beach, CA, July 1993. [4] Hallock, A. K. Polzin, K. A. and Emsellem, G. D. Two- dimensional Analysis of Conical Pulsed Inductive Plasma Thruster Performance. Number IEPC-2011-145, Septem- ber 2011. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20130001766 2020-03-30T14:15:41+00:00Z

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Thrust Stand Measurements of a Conical Inductive …...Thrust Stand Measurements of a Conical Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster Ashley K. Hallock Yetispace Inc. Kurt A. Polzin NASA

Thrust Stand Measurements of a Conical Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster

Ashley K. HallockYetispace Inc.

Kurt A. PolzinNASA Marshall Space Flight Center

I. INTRODUCTION

Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters (iPPT) [1–3] arespacecraft propulsion devices in which electrical energyis capacitively stored and then discharged through aninductive coil. The thruster is electrodeless, with a time-varying current in the coil interacting with a plasma cov-ering the face of the coil to induce a plasma current.Propellant is accelerated and expelled at a high exhaustvelocity (O (10− 100 km/s)) by the Lorentz body forcearising from the interaction of the magnetic field and theinduced plasma current.

While this class of thruster mitigates the life-limitingissues associated with electrode erosion, inductive pulsedplasma thrusters can suffer from both high pulse energyrequirements imposed by the voltage demands of induc-tive propellant ionization, and low propellant utilizationefficiencies.

FIG. 1: Time-integrated, unfiltered photograph showing anaxial view (along the thrust axis) of a conical iPPT operatingon 60 mg/s argon with an initial capacitor bank chargingvoltage of 5 kV.

A conical coil geometry may offer higher propellant uti-lization efficiency over that of a flat inductive coil, how-ever an increase in propellant utilization may be met witha decrease in axial electromagnetic acceleration, and inturn, a decrease in the total axially-directed kinetic en-ergy imparted to the propellant.

II. EXPERIMENT

Three conical inductive coils (with half cone angles of20◦, 38◦, and 60◦) were constructed and operated on athrust stand. Impulse bits were calculated from thrustdata to determine how the initial charging voltage of thecapacitor bank, the mass flow rate of injected propellant,and the cone angle affect the thrust of a propulsion de-vice employing a conical inductive coil in the presence ofpreionized propellant. A maximum in impulse bit wasfound with respect to coil geometry, and the mass flowrate for which the impulse bit is maximized was found todecrease with decreasing initial capacitor bank chargingvoltage. Dependencies on these experimental parametersare discussed in the context of previous semi-empiricalmodeling of the effect of inductive coil geometry on thrustefficiency [4].

III. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors appreciate the help and support of Mr.Adam Kimberlin, Mr. Tommy Reid, Mr. Douglas Gal-loway, Dr. Adam Martin, Dr. Noah Rhys, Mr. J. BoisePearson, and Mr. Jim Martin. This work was supportedin part by NASA’s Advanced In-Space Propulsion pro-gram managed by Dr. Michael LaPointe and the Officeof the Chief Technologist In-Space Propulsion Programmanaged by Mr. Timothy Smith.

[1] Polzin, K. A. Comprehensive review of planar pulsed in-ductive plasma thruster research and technology. Journalof Propulsion and Power, 27(3):513–531, May-June 2011.

[2] Lovberg, R. H. and Dailey, C. L. A PIT primer. TechnicalReport 005, RLD Associates, Encino, CA, 1994.

[3] Dailey, C. L. and Lovberg, R. H. The PIT MkV Pulsed

Inductive Thruster. Technical Report 191155, Lewis Re-search Center, Redondo Beach, CA, July 1993.

[4] Hallock, A. K. Polzin, K. A. and Emsellem, G. D. Two-dimensional Analysis of Conical Pulsed Inductive PlasmaThruster Performance. Number IEPC-2011-145, Septem-ber 2011.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20130001766 2020-03-30T14:15:41+00:00Z