tip mellman iran survey jan 24 2014 slides (2)
TRANSCRIPT
11
Findings From A National Survey Of 800 Likely Voters
The Israel Project
22
Key Findings Though Voters Like The President And Secretary
Kerry, They Offer Negative Evaluations Of The Administration's Handling Of Iran
Voters Overwhelmingly Favor Sanctions To Stop Iran's Nuclear Program
Preventing Iran From Getting Nuclear Weapons Is A Higher Priority Than Avoiding Military Action
Voters Are Mostly Unfamiliar With The Interim Agreement And Express Mixed Views
Voters Overwhelmingly Support New Sanctions Legislation, Even After Hearing Arguments From Both Sides
33
Methodology
National Poll:
800 Likely Voters
Interviews conducted January 21-23, 2014
Margin Of Error +/- 3.5 (Higher For Subgroups)
44
Though Voters Like The President And Secretary Kerry, They Offer Negative Evaluations Of The Administration's
Handling Of Iran
55
Favorable Unfavorable0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
51% 47%
30% Very
34% Very
A Narrow Plurality Views Obama Favorably
Barack Obama Favorability
Mean Ratio Hard ID
2.49 1.09 98%
Fav Unfav
Democrat ID 88% 10%Independent ID 42% 56%Republican ID 20% 78%
Women 57% 41%
Men 45% 53%
18-39 59% 39%
40-59 46% 53%
60+ 53% 46%
No College 46% 52%
College Grad+ 56% 43%
White 43% 55%
Black 93% 4%
Upper-SES 48% 50%
College Middle 57% 41%
Non-College Middle 43% 54%
Lower-SES 54% 46%
Northeast 57% 41%
Midwest 46% 52%
South 48% 50%
West 58% 42%
Relig Weekly+ 41% 57%
Relig Few Times/Mo 59% 41%
Relig Seldom/Never 59% 40%
+4
66
Favorable Unfavorable0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
48%
37%
21% Very
21% Very
A Plurality Views John Kerry Favorably
John Kerry Favorability
Mean Ratio Hard ID
2.56 1.30 84%
Fav Unfav
Democrat ID 70% 14%Independent ID 39% 43%Republican ID 32% 56%
Women 53% 29%
Men 42% 46%
18-39 54% 23%
40-59 41% 45%
60+ 52% 38%
No College 37% 39%
College Grad+ 57% 36%
White 44% 42%
Black 65% 8%
Upper-SES 49% 42%
College Middle 58% 34%
Non-College Middle 38% 40%
Lower-SES 45% 34%
Northeast 56% 34%
Midwest 49% 36%
South 44% 41%
West 46% 34%
Relig Weekly+ 41% 43%
Relig Few Times/Mo 60% 28%
Relig Seldom/Never 50% 35%
+11
77
Favor Oppose0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
30%
66%
Voters Give The Administration Negative Ratings For Dealing With Iran
What kind of job has President Obama and his administration done when it comes to dealing with Iran? Have President Obama and his administration done an excellent, good, only fair or poor
job when it comes to dealing with Iran?
6% Excellent
37% Poor
Positive Negative
Democrat ID 56% 39%Independent ID 21% 75%Republican ID 10% 86%
Women 32% 63%
Men 28% 69%
18-39 30% 63%
40-59 28% 70%
60+ 33% 63%
No College 25% 71%
College Grad+ 34% 62%
White 26% 71%
Black 54% 40%
Upper-SES 29% 67%
College Middle 36% 60%
Non-College Middle 26% 70%
Lower-SES 28% 68%
Northeast 31% 66%
Midwest 28% 69%
South 29% 68%
West 33% 60%
Relig Weekly+ 22% 73%
Relig Few Times/Mo 37% 58%
Relig Seldom/Never 35% 63%
-36
88
Americans Do Not Trust Iran, Seeing It As A Prime
Adversary
99
Favorable Unfavorable0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
12%
73%
4% Very
47% Very
Overwhelming Numbers View Iran Unfavorably
Iran Favorability
Mean Ratio Hard ID
1.63 0.16 85%
Fav Unfav
Democrat ID 17% 67%Independent ID 10% 72%Republican ID 7% 80%
Women 11% 70%
Men 12% 76%
18-39 17% 59%
40-59 8% 80%
60+ 12% 75%
No College 9% 72%
College Grad+ 14% 74%
White 9% 77%
Black 20% 59%
Upper-SES 10% 77%
College Middle 14% 76%
Non-College Middle 7% 70%
Lower-SES 15% 70%
Northeast 10% 75%
Midwest 12% 73%
South 11% 73%
West 13% 70%
Relig Weekly+ 9% 76%
Relig Few Times/Mo 14% 68%
Relig Seldom/Never 14% 73%
-61
1010
Favorable Unfavorable0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
5%
17%
Few Know Who Rouhani Is, Though Those Who Do, View Him Unfavorably
Hassan Rouhani Favorability
Mean Ratio Hard ID
1.81 0.29 22%
Fav Unfav
Democrat ID 6% 12%Independent ID 6% 17%Republican ID 3% 21%
Women 4% 12%
Men 6% 22%
18-39 5% 13%
40-59 5% 16%
60+ 5% 22%
No College 3% 14%
College Grad+ 7% 19%
White 5% 18%
Black 5% 11%
Upper-SES 4% 25%
College Middle 7% 20%
Non-College Middle 2% 16%
Lower-SES 7% 8%
Northeast 6% 14%
Midwest 3% 17%
South 6% 18%
West 6% 17%
Relig Weekly+ 6% 16%
Relig Few Times/Mo 7% 17%
Relig Seldom/Never 5% 16%
-12
1111
By Contrast, Voters Have Strongly Favorable Opinions Of Israel, And To A Lesser Extent Of Netanyahu
Israel Favorability
Favorable Unfavorable0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% 68%
16%
34% Very
Mean Ratio Hard ID
3.14 4.25 85%
Favorable Unfavorable0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
34%
16%
15% Very
Benjamin Netanyahu Favorability
Mean Ratio Hard ID
2.84 2.13 50%
+52 +18
1212
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
94%
79%
69%
67%
44%
42%
15%
7%
5%
18%
29%
29%
54%
56%
83%
90%
*Ranked By Net Trust
Don’t Trust
Voters Do Not Trust North Korea Or Iran To Abide By Agreements
Trust Net Trust
% Trust To Live Up To & Abide By
Diplomatic Agreements
+89
+61
+40
+38
-10
-14
-68
-83
Great Britain
Israel
Mexico
South Korea
Russia
China
Iran
North Korea
68% strong trust
37%
15%
25%
28%
28%
60%
77% strong distrust
1313
Trust Distrust0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
15%
83%
2% Great Deal
60% Not At All
No Voter Segment Trusts Iran
% Trust Iran To Live Up To & AbideBy Diplomatic Agreements
Trust Distrust
Democrat ID 19% 78%Independent ID 17% 81%Republican ID 7% 91%
Women 16% 82%
Men 14% 83%
18-39 26% 73%
40-59 12% 85%
60+ 9% 88%
No College 12% 85%
College Grad+ 17% 81%
White 13% 85%
Black 23% 73%
Upper-SES 12% 87%
College Middle 10% 88%
Non-College Middle 13% 84%
Lower-SES 16% 83%
Northeast 15% 84%
Midwest 9% 89%
South 15% 82%
West 20% 77%
Relig Weekly+ 12% 87%
Relig Few Times/Mo 20% 77%
Relig Seldom/Never 15% 83%
-68
1414
North Korea Iran China Iraq Pakistan Syria Russia
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
28%23%
18%
6% 6% 6% 5%
While North Korea Is Viewed As The Biggest Threat To The U.S., Iran Comes In A Close SecondRepublicans Tend To View Iran As A Bigger Threat Than Democrats
Which of the following countries do you think poses the biggest threat to the security of the United States?
N. Korea Iran
Democrat ID 33% 17%Independent ID 25% 25%Republican ID 26% 28%
1515
Voters Overwhelmingly Favor Sanctions To Stop Iran's Nuclear
Program
1616
Favor Oppose0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
83%
11%
Across Party Lines, Voters Overwhelmingly Favor Economic Sanctions On Iran To Pressure It To End Its Nuclear Weapons Program
As you may know, the United States and most other countries in the world have imposed economic sanctions on Iran to pressure it to end
its efforts to develop nuclear weapons Do you favor or oppose the economic sanctions that the U.S. has placed on Iran?
68% Strongly
6% Strongly
Favor Oppose
Democrat ID 83% 11%Independent ID 79% 14%Republican ID 89% 7%
Women 82% 12%
Men 85% 10%
18-39 75% 16%
40-59 84% 10%
60+ 89% 8%
No College 81% 12%
College Grad+ 86% 9%
White 85% 9%
Black 80% 15%
Upper-SES 87% 9%
College Middle 86% 9%
Non-College Middle 80% 13%
Lower-SES 82% 12%
Northeast 88% 8%
Midwest 84% 9%
South 83% 13%
West 80% 13%
Relig Weekly+ 86% 11%
Relig Few Times/Mo 91% 6%
Relig Seldom/Never 80% 13%
+72
1717
strengthen same reduce0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
39% 38%
14%
More Than Three Quarters Believe Sanctions Should Be Strengthened Or Remain At Their Current Level
In your opinion, should the United States now strengthen economic sanctions on Iran, reduce economic sanctions
on Iran, or should sanctions remain at the same level they are now?
strengthen same reduce
Democrat ID 28% 42% 18%Independent ID 41% 40% 14%Republican ID 49% 32% 9%
Women 37% 40% 12%
Men 41% 36% 16%
18-39 32% 43% 13%
40-59 43% 37% 12%
60+ 39% 36% 17%
No College 41% 36% 12%
College Grad+ 37% 40% 16%
White 41% 36% 13%
Black 32% 47% 8%
Upper-SES 44% 37% 16%
College Middle 38% 40% 13%
Non-College Middle 41% 37% 13%
Lower-SES 35% 38% 15%
Northeast 36% 46% 15%
Midwest 41% 35% 14%
South 40% 40% 12%
West 38% 34% 16%
Relig Weekly+ 46% 35% 11%
Relig Few Times/Mo 44% 35% 15%
Relig Seldom/Never 28% 43% 19%
77%
1818
Allow Dismantle0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
32%
62%
Most Believe Iran Should Dismantle Its Nuclear Infrastructure Before Sanctions Are Lifted
Allow Iran to keep its nuclear infrastructure and stockpiles of enriched uranium in place and lift economic sanctions against Iran so long as Iran agrees to not build nuclear weapons, limits future uranium enrichment and submits to international inspections of its nuclear facilities.
In trying to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, should the United States …
Insist that Iran dismantles its nuclear infrastructure and give up the ability to build a nuclear weapon before any economic sanctions are lifted.
Allow Dismantle
Democrat ID 37% 55%Independent ID 33% 63%Republican ID 26% 69%
Women 29% 65%
Men 36% 59%
18-39 43% 53%
40-59 28% 65%
60+ 29% 65%
No College 33% 60%
College Grad+ 31% 64%
White 32% 63%
Black 33% 59%
Upper-SES 36% 61%
College Middle 30% 64%
Non-College Middle 33% 61%
Lower-SES 33% 61%
Northeast 36% 62%
Midwest 29% 63%
South 34% 60%
West 30% 64%
Relig Weekly+ 28% 67%
Relig Few Times/Mo 31% 63%
Relig Seldom/Never 37% 58%
24% Strongly
49% Strongly
+30
1919
Preventing Iran From Getting Nukes Is A Higher Priority Than Avoiding Military
Action
2020
Allowing Iran To Develop Nuclear Weapons Is Judged More Dangerous Than Targeted Military Strikes
Iran Nukes Military Strikes
Democrat ID 48% 40%Independent ID 52% 39%Republican ID 63% 31%Women 54% 37%Men 54% 37%18-39 50% 45%40-59 59% 32%60+ 52% 37%No College 54% 35%College Grad+ 54% 39%White 55% 35%Black 56% 36%Upper-SES 56% 38%College Middle 55% 36%Non-College Middle 52% 38%Lower-SES 54% 37%Northeast 55% 36%Midwest 55% 36%South 58% 34%West 47% 43%Relig Weekly+ 55% 39%Relig Few Times/Mo 57% 37%Relig Seldom/Never 51% 38%
Iran Nukes Military strikes0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%54%
37%
Allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons.
In the long run, which is more dangerous for the United States:
Targeted military strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities to try and stop them from developing nuclear weapons
47% Strongly
26% Strongly
2121
By Over 3 To 1, Voters Believe Preventing Iran From Developing Nuclear Weapons Is More Important Than Avoiding Military Strikes
Prevent Nukes Avoid Strikes
Democrat ID 61% 27%Independent ID 66% 23%Republican ID 80% 13%Women 71% 19%Men 66% 23%18-39 65% 27%40-59 70% 21%60+ 69% 18%No College 69% 19%College Grad+ 68% 23%White 68% 21%Black 76% 15%Upper-SES 70% 20%College Middle 64% 26%Non-College Middle 71% 18%Lower-SES 71% 19%Northeast 71% 21%Midwest 66% 22%South 72% 19%West 64% 23%Relig Weekly+ 74% 17%Relig Few Times/Mo 79% 14%Relig Seldom/Never 62% 28%
Prevent Nukes Avoid Strikes0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
68%
21%
59% Strongly
13% Strongly
To avoid military strikes on Iran, even if it means allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.
To prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it requires military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Which of the following should be the most impt. goal of the U.S. in dealing with Iran’s nuclear program?
22220% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
78%
75%
73%
71%
70%
66%
64%
58%
Voters Are Most Concerned About Iran Arming Terrorists With Nukes, Attacking U.S. Troops And Launching A Missile Against The U.S.
% concerns a great deal
Now I am going to read you a list of things that could happen if Iran is able to develop a nuclear weapon. After I read each, please tell me if that concerns you a great deal, some, not too much or not at all?
Iran could give nuclear weapons to terrorist groups trying to attack the United States and our allies
Iran could use nuclear weapons to attack American troops in the Middle-East
Iran is developing nuclear-armed ballistic missiles that could enable them to launch a nuclear attack on the U.S. by 2015
Allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons could embolden other countries to develop nuclear weapons, triggering an arms race in one of
the most dangerous parts of the world
A nuclear-armed Iran could launch nuclear weapons against Israel, our closest ally in the region
Iran could become a regional superpower that is even harder to deter than it is now
Iran would have the capability to menace oil suppliers, causing the price of oil & gasoline to increase, threatening the global economy
America’s influence around the world would be undermined
2323
Voters Are Mostly Unfamiliar With The Interim Agreement And Express Mixed
Views
2424
How much, if anything, have you heard about an interim agreement between the United States and Iran that places some temporary restraints on the pace of Iran’s nuclear
program in exchange for some relief from economic sanctions on Iran?
Great Deal Some Not Too Much
Nothing At All
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
15%
32%29%
23%
47%Heard
52% Not Heard
Only About Half Have Heard Anything About The Interim Agreement, And Few Know Much
Heard Not Heard
Democrat ID 42% 56%Independent ID 50% 49%Republican ID 48% 51%
Women 38% 61%
Men 56% 43%
18-39 39% 59%
40-59 44% 55%
60+ 56% 42%
No College 40% 59%
College Grad+ 53% 46%
White 49% 51%
Black 30% 68%
Upper-SES 61% 38%
College Middle 51% 47%
Non-College Middle 43% 56%
Lower-SES 36% 62%
Northeast 49% 50%
Midwest 46% 51%
South 51% 49%
West 38% 60%
Relig Weekly+ 46% 52%
Relig Few Times/Mo 51% 48%
Relig Seldom/Never 46% 53%
2525
Favor Oppose0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% 55%
37%
A Majority Favors The Interim Agreement With IranVoters Cleave Sharply Across Party, Age And Religiousity
As you may know, the United States & 5 other world powers recently reached an interim agreement with Iran that would reduce
some economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for a commitment by Iran to temporarily limit some parts of its nuclear program, while a final agreement is being negotiated. Do you favor or
oppose this agreement?
34% Strongly
27% Strongly
Favor Oppose
Democrat ID 70% 23%Independent ID 47% 42%Republican ID 46% 47%
Women 58% 33%
Men 52% 41%
18-39 70% 21%
40-59 49% 42%
60+ 51% 42%
No College 54% 37%
College Grad+ 56% 37%
White 52% 40%
Black 63% 29%
Upper-SES 56% 40%
College Middle 55% 38%
Non-College Middle 57% 34%
Lower-SES 53% 36%
Northeast 56% 41%
Midwest 48% 39%
South 52% 39%
West 65% 27%
Relig Weekly+ 49% 44%
Relig Few Times/Mo 61% 32%
Relig Seldom/Never 63% 30%
2626
Series10%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
55% 56% 54%59%
52%
37%42% 43%
32% 32%
FavorOppose
TOTAL
Opposition To The Interim Agreement Is Somewhat Higher Among Those Who Have Heard More About It
Favor/Oppose Interim Agreement By Awareness Of Agreement
Heard Great Deal
Heard Some
Heard Nothing
At All
Heard Not Too Much
2727
U.S. Made Right Decision Require Iran To Abandon Nuclear Weapons
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
39%
57%
Though Voters Support The Agreement, They Would Have Preferred Requiring Iran To Abandon Its Nuclear Program Before Reducing Any Sanctions
The United States made the right decision by reducing sanctions and financial pressure in exchange for an agreement by Iran to put some temporary limits on its nuclear program, while a final agreement is being negotiated.
Which of the following statements about the interim agreement with Iran comes closer to your point of view:
The United States should have required Iran to completely abandon its nuclear program before agreeing to reduce sanctions.
29% Strongly
45% Strongly
2828
Favor Oppose0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
68%
26%
More Than Two-Thirds Favor Releasing The Entire Text To The Public
As of right now, the Obama Administration has shared the agreement with Iran only with some Members of Congress. Do you favor or oppose releasing the text of the entire deal to the public?
57% strong
16% strong
Favor Oppose
Democrat ID 61% 30%Independent ID 69% 25%Republican ID 74% 22%
Women 65% 29%
Men 71% 23%
18-39 73% 24%
40-59 69% 24%
60+ 63% 29%
No College 72% 22%
College Grad+ 65% 29%
White 71% 24%
Black 48% 45%
Upper-SES 69% 27%
College Middle 65% 27%
Non-College Middle 74% 20%
Lower-SES 68% 26%
Northeast 70% 25%
Midwest 63% 28%
South 64% 29%
West 75% 19%
Relig Weekly+ 65% 29%
Relig Few Times/Mo 72% 23%
Relig Seldom/Never 71% 23%
2929
Likely Unlikely0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
31%
66%
Voters Don’t Believe Iran Will Live Up To The Interim Agreement
How likely do you think it is that Iran will live up to and abide by this interim agreement? Is it very likely, somewhat likely, somewhat unlikely, or very unlikely that Iran will live up to
and abide by this agreement?
6% very
45% very
Likely Unlikely
Democrat ID 44% 52%Independent ID 28% 68%Republican ID 18% 80%
Women 30% 67%
Men 32% 65%
18-39 40% 56%
40-59 24% 73%
60+ 31% 65%
No College 28% 68%
College Grad+ 32% 65%
White 28% 68%
Black 35% 61%
Upper-SES 34% 64%
College Middle 32% 64%
Non-College Middle 29% 68%
Lower-SES 28% 69%
Northeast 32% 66%
Midwest 29% 65%
South 27% 70%
West 36% 61%
Relig Weekly+ 26% 71%
Relig Few Times/Mo 33% 63%
Relig Seldom/Never 35% 63%
3030
-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
95%
94%
91%
88%
86%
85%
83%
3%
3%
6%
8%
9%
11%
12%
*Ranked By % Favor
Oppose
Voters Strongly Favor Requiring Iran To Take A Number Of Actions During Negotiations
Favor Net Favor
% Favor/ Oppose
+92
+91
+85
+80
+77
+74
+71
87% strong favor
88%
83%
76%
74%
77%
73%
Iran should be required to allow international inspections of all Iranian nuclear facilities
Iran should be required to cease all acts of terrorism against the U.S.
Iran should be required to freeze all efforts to develop long-range ballistic missiles while
negotiations are taking place
Iran should be required to place all nuclear materials currently possessed by Iran under
the control of international monitors
Iran should be required to recognize the right of Israel to exist
Iran should be required to cease all efforts to enrich uranium while negotiations are taking
place
Iran should be required to destroy all centrifuges that can be used to enrich uranium to the point it can be used in nuclear weapons
Now I am going to read you a list of actions that some people have suggested Iran should be required to take while it is negotiating with the U.S. on its nuclear program. After I read each, please tell me whether you would favor or oppose requiring Iran to take that
action before the U.S. signs a final agreement with Iran on lifting sanctions
3131
Voters Believe Iran Is Using Negotiations To Stall While Continuing Development Of Nukes
Stalling Good faith0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
73%
20%
Stalling Good faith0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
70%
21%
Iran is using these negotiations to stall as it continues to develop its ability to make nuclear weapons.
Which of the following statements about Iran comes closer to your point of view:
Iran is negotiating in good faith and will eventually give up their ability to make nuclear weapons.
62% Strongly
8% Strongly
59% Strongly
11% Strongly
*Questions split-sampled
Iran is negotiating in good faith and may eventually give up their ability to make nuclear weapons.
3232
Every Segment Believes Iran Is Using The Negotiations To Stall
stalling good faith0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
72%
20%
Iran is using these negotiations to stall as it continues to develop its ability to make nuclear weapons.
Which of the following statements about Iran comes closer to your point of view:
Iran is negotiating in good faith and (may/will) eventually give up their ability to make nuclear weapons.
61% Strongly
9% Strongly
Stalling Good faith
Democrat ID 62% 27%Independent ID 82% 12%Republican ID 72% 21%
Women 74% 18%
Men 69% 23%
18-39 61% 30%
40-59 74% 18%
60+ 77% 16%
No College 72% 19%
College Grad+ 72% 22%
White 75% 19%
Black 66% 20%
Upper-SES 73% 20%
College Middle 71% 22%
Non-College Middle 75% 16%
Lower-SES 69% 22%
Northeast 77% 17%
Midwest 71% 19%
South 75% 18%
West 63% 28%
Relig Weekly+ 79% 15%
Relig Few Times/Mo 81% 13%
Relig Seldom/Never 61% 29%
Split Samples Combined
3333
Most Believe That Congress Should Approve Any Final Deal With Iran, Though Democrats Are More Evenly Divided On The Matter
Cong approval Prez power0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
69%
25%
For over 15 years, Congress has been the prime mover of sanctions on Iran and should approve a final deal before sanctions are lifted, because it will help ensure we get the best possible deal and do not leave Iran with the ability to make nuclear weapons in the future.
Which of the following statements comes closer to your point of view?
President Obama should have the power to make an agreement with Iran, without going back to Congress to repeal sanctions, because meddling by Congress could endanger negotiations between the United States and Iran, nullifying the current deal and enabling Iran to re-start its weapons program.
58% Strongly
17% Strongly
Cong Prez
Democrat ID 54% 40%Independent ID 73% 22%Republican ID 82% 12%
Women 68% 25%
Men 71% 24%
18-39 70% 26%
40-59 69% 26%
60+ 70% 22%
No College 72% 21%
College Grad+ 67% 27%
White 73% 21%
Black 52% 41%
Upper-SES 75% 20%
College Middle 65% 30%
Non-College Middle 75% 20%
Lower-SES 66% 27%
Northeast 68% 26%
Midwest 66% 26%
South 73% 22%
West 67% 28%
Relig Weekly+ 75% 20%
Relig Few Times/Mo 73% 23%
Relig Seldom/Never 62% 32%
3434
Voters Overwhelmingly Support New Sanctions Legislation, Even
After Hearing Arguments On Both Sides
3535
Great Deal Some Not Too Much
Nothing At All
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
9%
22%
31%37%
30%Heard
68% Not Heard
Less Than A Third Have Heard About New Congressional Legislation That Would Trigger Sanctions On IranOlder Voters Are Most Aware
Heard Not Heard
Democrat ID 34% 64%Independent ID 29% 69%Republican ID 29% 71%
Women 27% 70%
Men 35% 64%
18-39 24% 74%
40-59 26% 71%
60+ 41% 57%
No College 28% 70%
College Grad+ 32% 66%
White 31% 67%
Black 27% 71%
Upper-SES 39% 58%
College Middle 34% 64%
Non-College Middle 29% 69%
Lower-SES 23% 76%
Northeast 31% 69%
Midwest 31% 66%
South 31% 67%
West 28% 70%
Relig Weekly+ 30% 69%
Relig Few Times/Mo 28% 69%
Relig Seldom/Never 32% 66%
How much, if anything, have you heard about legislation in Congress that could trigger new sanctions on Iran?
3636
Favor Oppose0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
78%
15%
Initially, An Overwhelming Majority Favors Legislation Triggering New Sanctions If Iran Cheats On The Agreement, Fails To Negotiate A Deal Or Engages In Terrorism
Just so we are on the same page, there is legislation in the Senate sponsored by 59 Senators from both parties that would trigger new sanctions on Iran if they cheat on the terms of the current interim
agreement, fail to negotiate a final deal to eliminate their ability to make nuclear weapons, or if they are found to be involved in a
terrorist act against the United States during nuclear talks. Do you favor or oppose this legislation?
64% Strongly
10% Strongly
Favor Oppose
Democrat ID 74% 17%Independent ID 76% 15%Republican ID 83% 12%
Women 79% 13%
Men 77% 17%
18-39 80% 16%
40-59 77% 14%
60+ 77% 16%
No College 76% 16%
College Grad+ 79% 14%
White 79% 13%
Black 72% 17%
Upper-SES 81% 14%
College Middle 79% 15%
Non-College Middle 76% 15%
Lower-SES 77% 15%
Northeast 80% 16%
Midwest 77% 14%
South 76% 14%
West 79% 16%
Relig Weekly+ 76% 16%
Relig Few Times/Mo 83% 11%
Relig Seldom/Never 80% 15%
+63
3737
Series10%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
78% 80% 78% 77% 80%
15% 19%17% 13% 14%
FavorOppose
TOTAL
Support For The Legislation Is Strong Regardless Of Voters’ Familiarity With The Proposal
Favor/Oppose Legislation Triggering Sanctions By Awareness
Heard Great Deal
Heard Some
Heard Nothing
At All
Heard Not Too Much
3838
Opponents of the legislation say the interim agreement negotiated between the United States and Iran, and the current diplomatic process to reach a final agreement, is the best way to ensure that Iran will not develop nuclear weapons in the future, and those pushing for more sanctions on Iran are putting the country on a path to war. Part of the agreement states that no new sanctions are to be imposed while the permanent agreement is being negotiated. Therefore, new sanctions now will cause this deal to fall apart and Iran will continue developing nuclear weapons. Moreover, the United States risks losing support from our allies who made these sanctions successful. We can always restore and strengthen sanctions against Iran if things change, but we should give this agreement a chance to work first.
Supporters of the bipartisan bill say it strengthens diplomacy and increases our chances of peacefully stopping Iran. In fact, it is Congressional sanctions that finally pushed Iran into negotiations, and it is pressure that will keep them there and convince them to compromise. Given Iran’s history of lying about its nuclear program and violating agreements, Iran cannot be trusted. Their threats to walk away from talks are not new and not credible – they need a deal more than we do. Unfortunately, the “interim” agreement has too many loopholes, relieves financial pressure prematurely, and undercuts the leverage we need to end the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. Passing legislation laying out sanctions should Iran cheat, or refuse a final agreement, balances the interim deal, supports our diplomacy and will help get a good final deal.
Voters Were Given Arguments By Both Supporters And Opponents Of Congressional Legislation
3939
Favor Oppose0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
63%
28%
After Arguments On Both Sides Of The Issue, Voters Still Favor Legislation Triggering New Sanctions By Over Two-To-One While Democrats Are A Bit Less Supportive, A Clear Majority Still Favors The LegislationAFTER VOTERS HEARD ARGUMENTS:
Now that you’ve heard arguments on both sides of the issue, do you favor or oppose this legislation triggering new
sanctions against Iran?
49% Strongly
17% Strongly
Favor Oppose
Democrat ID 55% 36%Independent ID 65% 27%Republican ID 71% 20%
Women 58% 30%
Men 69% 25%
18-39 60% 32%
40-59 67% 24%
60+ 62% 28%
No College 64% 24%
College Grad+ 63% 30%
White 64% 27%
Black 67% 22%
Upper-SES 64% 32%
College Middle 62% 28%
Non-College Middle 64% 24%
Lower-SES 64% 28%
Northeast 60% 32%
Midwest 64% 27%
South 67% 24%
West 61% 29%
Relig Weekly+ 67% 26%
Relig Few Times/Mo 71% 22%
Relig Seldom/Never 57% 34%
+35
4040
Strategic Conclusions Voters do not trust Iran and do not believe that they
will abide by their treaty commitments
Most voters favor sanctions on Iran, and few believe they should be weakened
While a majority favors the interim agreement, most would have preferred requiring Iran to dismantle its nuclear program before getting sanctions relief
Most favor legislation triggering sanctions on Iran if they cheat or fail to come to a final resolution – a majority that holds up after voters hear arguments on both sides