title gabriella sciolla massachusetts institute of technology representing the babar collaboration...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
Title
Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Representing the BaBar Collaboration
Beauty 2005 - Assisi, June 20-24, 2005
Searching for New Physics at the B factories:
Measurements of sin2 at BaBar
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 2
BaBar and PEP-II
BaBar detector 4 collider detector
PEP-II asymmetric B factory 9.0 GeV e- beam 3.1 GeV e+ beam
Peak luminosity 9.1 x 1033 cm-2s-1
Integrated luminosity Delivered: >268 fb-1
e+
e+
Most results in this talk are based on 227 M BB events
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 3
The Beauty of the Unitarity Triangle
Two ways of looking for New Physics: Compare measurement of sides and angles Measure angles in channels with different sensitivity to New
Physics
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 4
The three roads to Charmonium modes:
J/ψ KS, ψ(2S) KS, χc1 KS, ηc KS
J/ψ KL
J/ψ K*0 (K*0 → KS π0)
Open-charm modes: D*+ D*−, D*+ D−, D+ D−
Penguin-dominated modes: φ K0, K+
K− KS, KS KS KS
η′ KS
KS π0, ω KS, f0(980) KS d d
d
b c
d
c
d
d d
s
c
cb
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 5
CP violation in interference between mixing and decays
0 0
0 0
( ( ) ) ( ( ) )( )
( ( ) ) ( ( ) )
sin( ) cos( )
CP CPCP
CP CP
ff
N B t f N B t fA t
N B t f N B t f
S mt C mt
2
2
1
1
f
f
f
C
2
2Im
1
f
f
f
S ff
f
Aqλ
p A
i2e~
0B
0B
CPf
mixin
g
decay
0t t
CPfA
CPfA
(f
)
When only one diagram contributes to the final state: Example: B0 J/KS:
0
Imf
f
C
S
0 0
* * *2
* * *
mix mix
itb td cs cb cd csf
tb td cs cb cd csB decay K
V V V V V Ve
V V V V V V
sin2( ) sin( )CP fA t mt d d
d
c
cb
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 6
Exclusive Breconstruction
How to measure the CP asymmetry
.
e-
Flavor taggingQ=(30.5 0.5)%
(4S)
B0
B0
e-
+
-
e+
+
-
Precise t determination
z~ c t
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 7
The golden mode for sin2: B0 charmonium K0
Theoretically clean Experimentally clean Relatively large BF (~10-4)
CP sample:
mES [GeV]
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 161803 (2005)
d d
d
c
cb
s s c s c s
1
J / K , (2s)K , K , K
4370CPN
L
1
J / K
2788CPN
E [MeV]
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 8
CP=+1
CP=-1
sin(2) = 0.722 ± 0.040stat ± 0.023syst
Unbinned maximum likelihood fit to t distribution
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 161803 (2005)
The golden mode for sin2: CP fit in B charmonium K0
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 9
SM test in B0 charmonium K0
Compare sides and angles Both BaBar and Belle results
used
Ambiguity resolved measuring sign(cos2) in B0J/K* cos(2)=-0.68 excluded at
86.6%CL [PRD 71 (2005)032005]
Excellent agreement with constraints from the sides Another SM triumph?
.
cos(2β)<0
cos(2β)>0
SM test #2: Compare in various channels
Measurements of angles NOT included in fit
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 10
The bccd trees:
B0 open charm
Tree measures sin2 from bccd transitions Penguin expected to be small in SM (< few %)
D*D*: as large as = 0.6 [Grossman and Worah, 1997]
New Physics could have large effects
u,c,t
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 11
Vector-vector final state: CP-even and CP-odd admixture
Transversity analysis measures fCP-even
The open charm trees:
Recent update: B0 D*+D*-
CCP+ = +0.06 ± 0.17 ± 0.03-SCP+ = 0.75 ± 0.25 ± 0.03
New
BaBar Preliminary
In good agreement with SMfCP+ = (87.5 4.4 0.7)%
* * 391 28D DN
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 12
The open charm trees:
B0 D(*) D
hep-ex/0505092
-S 0.54 0.35 0.07 0.29 0.33 0.07 0.29 0.63 0.06
C 0.09 0.25 0.06 0.17 0.24 0.04 0.11 0.35 0.06
D*+D- D*-D+ D+D-
Updated Updated New
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 13
The key to New Physics:
The Penguin ModesDecays dominated by gluonic penguin diagrams The typical example: B0KS
No tree level contributions In SM, top quark dominates the loop: C~0; S~sin2
Impact of New Physics could be significant New particles could participate in the loop new CPV
phases Low branching fractions
Measure ACP in as many bsqq penguins as possible! φ K0, K+ K− KS, η′ KS, KS π0, KS KS KS, ω KS, f0(980) KS
d d d d
SM NP
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 14
The golden penguin: B0 K0
Combined KS and KL fit:
Phys. Rev. D 71, 091102(R) (2005)
0
0
0.07 0.040.50 0.25
0.00 0.23 0.05K
K
S
C
98 18LKN
114 12SKN
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 15
For non resonant B0K+K-KS decays, CP = 2 feven- 1 feven measured from angular moment analysis of the K+K-
system
Related channel: B0 K+K-KS
0sin2 0.55 0.22 0.04 0.11effstat syst CPK K K
Phys. Rev. D 71, 091102(R) (2005)
452 28SK K K
N
2S
even 2 2S P
Af = = 0.89 ± 0.08 ± 0.06
A A
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 16
A new golden penguin: B0KSKSKS
hep-ex/0502013 (accepted by PRL)
0.32 0.38
0.28 0.35
0.71 0.04
0.34 0.05S S S
S S S
K K K
K K K
S
C
Theoretically clean Penguin dominated CP=+1
eigenstate
Experimentally challenging B decay vertex uses KS pseudo-
particles and beam spot constraint
88 10S S SK K KN
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 17
The silver penguin: B0 ’KS
Relative large BF ~ 6 x 10-5 Theoretically less clean than KS
Tree diagram possible … but Cabibbo and color suppressed…
|S| =|SK-SPenguin|~ 0.01QCDFact 0.1SU(3)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 191802 (2005)
Sη′Ks = 0.30 ± 0.14 ± 0.02
Cη′Ks = −0.21 ± 0.10 ± 0.02
' 804 40SKN
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 18
The challenging penguins:
B00KS, f0KS, KS
B00KS: dominated by tree contribution are non negligible (S ~ 0.1 – 0.2) Experimental challenge: BCP decay vertex reconstruction
(t~1ps)
B0f0KS: In SM dominated by
B0KS: In SM dominated by But tree can be relatively large
b suub sdd
hep-ex/0503011 hep-ex/0408095hep-ex/0503018
B00KS B0f0KS B0KS
-f S 0.35 0.04 +0.95 0.10 +0.50 0.02
C 0.06 0.18 0.03
-0.24 0.31 0.15 -0.56 0.03
0.30 0.33
b sss
b sdd
0.23 0.32
0.34 0.38
0.29 0.27
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 19
“sin2” in penguins: BaBar only
• Although each measurement is compatible with J/KS, a trend is visible
• ’KS has the most significant shift (~2.9 if theory uncertainties neglected)
… but statistical errors are still large…
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 20
• Average of BaBar and Belle results
• Boxes are SM expected ranges for -fSf from Beneke, hep-ph/0505075
• Shift still significant…
SJ/- Spenguins > 3
“sin2” in penguins: BaBar + Belle
Statistical fluctuation or first signs of New Physics?
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 21
Summary and Conclusion
Precision measurements of sin2 in many different channels are a powerful probe for New Physics B0 charmonium K0: our calibration point (sin2~ 0.04) B0 open charm: no smoking guns so far B0 penguin modes: intriguing shifts observed
New Physics or statistical fluctuations? Time and data will tell…
Goals for BaBar luminosity Summer 2006: 500 fb-1
Summer 2008: 1 ab-1
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 22
Backup slides --------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 23
Transversity analysis
2
2 2 20 ||
| |
| | | | | |
AR
A A A
• D*+D*- is not a CP eigenstate
• sum of L=0, 2 (CP even) and L=1 (CP odd)
• CP odd fraction R determined by transversity analysis
2 21 d 3 3(1 )sin cos
d cos 4 2
tr trtr
R R
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 24
D*D analysis
SM expectations D+D-
D*D
* *
* *
2*
0 * 0 *
sin(2 ) and sin(2 )
with:
X= 1-C
=difference of strong phases for and
D D D D
D D D D
D D
C C
S X S X
B D D B D D
0
sin2
C
S
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 25
cos and sin fits in penguin modes
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 26
The challenging penguins: B00 KS
In SM these decays are dominated by tree contribution are non negligible
S ~ 0.1 in model dependent QCD calculations S ~ 0.2 in SU(3)
Experimentally challenging BCP decay vtx from KS and beam spot KS tracks with > 3 SVT: t~1ps
Unbinned max likelihood fit:
Nsig = 300 ± 23
0
0
0.30 0.330.35 0.04
0.06 0.18 0.03S
S
K
K
S
C
b suub sdd
hep-ex/0503011
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 27
Two more penguins: B0 f0KS and B0 KS
B0 f0KS dominated by b sss
hep-ex/0408095hep-ex/0503018
10.095.0 23.0 32.0 0
SKfCP S
0153 19
Sf KN
648 ,2
sin cos)980(0
sss
dduussf
B0 ωKS : dominated by b → sddTree contamination can be relatively large
02.050.0 34.0 38.0
SKCP S
092 13
SKN
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 28
The Other Trees:
Recent update: B D*+D*-
Vector-vector final state: CP-even and CP-odd admixture
Transversity analysis measures fodd
fodd = (12.5 4.4 0.7)%
CCP+ = +0.04 ± 0.14 ± 0.02
-SCP+ = 0.65 ± 0.26 +0.09-0.07 ± 0.04
Results presented at Moriond 2005
Good agreement with SM
BaBar Preliminary
G. Sciolla – M.I.T.Measurements of sin(2) at
BaBar 29
Penguins vs tree