title page differential effects of selexipag and prostacyclin analogs in rat pulmonary...
TRANSCRIPT
JPET #197152
1
TITLE PAGE
Differential effects of selexipag and prostacyclin analogs in rat pulmonary artery
Keith Morrison, Rolf Studer, Roland Ernst, Franck Haag, Katalin Kauser, Martine Clozel
Drug Discovery Department, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Ltd
Allschwil, Switzerland
JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI:10.1124/jpet.112.197152
Copyright 2012 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
2
RUNNING TITLE PAGE
Running Title: Selexipag and rat pulmonary artery
Corresponding Author: Keith Morrison Ph.D.,
Drug Discovery Department,
Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.,
Gewerbestrasse 16,
Allschwil CH4123
Switzerland
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: +41 61 5656565
Text Pages: 29
Number of tables: 3
Number of Figures: 8
Number of References: 50
Abstract word count: 247
Introduction word count: 750
Discussion word count: 1457
Abbreviations: PGI2, prostacyclin; IP receptor, PGI2 receptor; EP1 receptor,
prostaglandin E receptor 1; EP3 receptor, prostaglandin E receptor 3; DP1 receptor,
prostaglandin D2 receptor; TP receptor, thromboxane A2 receptor; EPA, extralobar
pulmonary artery; IPA, intralobar pulmonary artery; MCT, monocrotaline; PAH,
pulmonary arterial hypertension; PASMC, pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells;
PGF2α, prostaglandin F2α; QPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; RVSP, right
ventricular systolic pressure; ACT-333679, {4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-
yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}acetic acid; selexipag, 2-{4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
3
yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide; DBTSA, (2E)-3-(3',4'-
dichlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-N-(2-thienylsulfonyl)acrylamide; SC51322, 8-chloro-2-[3-[(2-
furanylmethyl)thio]-1-oxopropyl]hydrazide, dibenz[b,f][1,4]oxazepine-10(11H)-
carboxylic acid hydrazide; GR32191B, (4Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3S,5S)-5-([1,1’-biphenyl]-4-
ylmethoxy)-3-hydroxy-2-(1-piperidinyl)cyclopentyl]-4-hetenoic acid.
Section: Drug Discovery and Translational Medicine
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
4
ABSTRACT
ACT-333679 is the main metabolite of the selective prostacyclin (PGI2) receptor (IP
receptor) agonist selexipag. The goal of this study was to determine the influence of IP
receptor selectivity on vasorelaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 and the PGI2 analog
treprostinil in pulmonary artery under conditions associated with PAH. Selexipag and
ACT-333679 evoked full relaxation of pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH
rats, and ACT-333679 relaxed normal pulmonary artery contracted with either ET-1 or
phenylephrine. In contrast, treprostinil evoked weaker relaxation than ACT-333679 of
control pulmonary artery and failed to induce relaxation of pulmonary artery from MCT-
PAH rats. Treprostinil did not evoke relaxation of normal pulmonary artery contracted
with either ET-1 or phenylephrine. Expression of EP3 receptor mRNA was increased in
pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. In contraction experiments, the selective EP3
receptor agonist sulprostone evoked significantly greater contraction of pulmonary artery
from MCT-PAH compared to control rats. The presence of a threshold concentration of
ET-1 significantly augmented the contractile response to sulprostone in normal
pulmonary artery. ACT-333679 did not evoke direct contraction of rat pulmonary artery,
whereas treprostinil evoked concentration-dependent contraction that was inhibited by the
EP3 receptor antagonist DBTSA. Antagonism of EP3 receptors also revealed a relaxant
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
5
response to treprostinil in normal pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1. These data
demonstrate that the relaxant efficacy of the selective IP receptor agonist selexipag and
its metabolite ACT-333679 is not modified under conditions associated with PAH,
whereas relaxation to treprostinil may be limited in the presence of mediators of disease.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
6
INTRODUCTION
Selexipag is an orally available IP receptor agonist in clinical development for the
treatment of PAH (Simonneau et al, 2012; GRIPHON Phase 3 clinical trial). Both
selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679 (previously known as MRE-269)
possess high selectivity for the IP receptor over other prostanoid receptors, and as such
can be distinguished from PGI2 analogs currently used in the management of PAH
(Kuwano et al, 2007). Progression of PAH is associated with reduced PGI2 production
(Christman et al, 1992; Tuder et al, 1999), and restoration of IP receptor signaling using
analogs of PGI2 is an effective strategy in the treatment of the disease (Gomberg-
Maitland and Olschewski, 2008). Clinical efficacy and tolerability of PGI2 analogs,
however, may be compromised by concomitant activation of other prostanoid receptors.
The selectivity of PGI2 replacement therapies for the IP receptor, therefore, is emerging
as an important consideration in the management of PAH. For example, vasorelaxation
to iloprost and beraprost is attenuated in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats (Kuwano
et al, 2008) via a mechanism that involves co-activation of the contractile EP3 receptor.
In contrast, ACT-333679 has at least 130-fold selectivity for the human IP receptor over
other prostanoid receptors (Kuwano et al, 2007), and vasorelaxation of rat pulmonary
artery evoked by ACT-333679 is not modulated by antagonism of EP3 receptors
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
7
(Kuwano et al, 2008). Moreover, gastric side-effects including cramping, nausea and
vomiting may develop via EP3 receptor-dependent mechanisms. Analogs of PGI2
contract gastric smooth muscle via stimulation of EP3 receptors (Morrison et al, 2010).
Activation of the EP3 receptor subtype mediates disruption of gastric contractility (Pal et
al, 2007, Forrest et al, 2009) and underlies the development of emesis (Kan et al, 2002).
Selexipag does not evoke gastric contraction, nor disrupts gastric function in the rat
stomach (Morrison et al, 2010). A role for EP3 receptors has also been invoked in the
development of peripheral pain reported in patients receiving treatment with PGI2 analogs
(Minami et al, 2001; Southall and Vasko, 2001). Thus, the development of a selective IP
receptor agonist that is devoid of off-target effects may provide improved efficacy and
tolerability in patients with PAH.
Infusion of treprostinil via the subcutaneous or intravenous routes is effective in
the clinical management of PAH (Simonneau et al, 2002; Tapson et al, 2006). Also,
treprostinil reduces pulmonary arterial pressure, as measured by right ventricular systolic
pressure (RVSP), and total pulmonary vascular resistance (TPVR) in the rat MCT-PAH
model (Yang et al, 2010), but the contribution of dilatation of the pulmonary artery to this
effect is not clear. Little information on the direct vasorelaxant efficacy of treprostinil in
pulmonary artery ex vivo is available.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
8
The present study sought to determine the influence of IP receptor selectivity of
ACT-333679 and treprostinil on vasorelaxation of the rat pulmonary artery under
pathological conditions associated with PAH. Experiments were performed using
pulmonary artery isolated from the rat MCT-PAH model. Although development of
neointimal and plexiform lesions, characteristic of the human disease (Tuder et al, 2007),
is not a feature of this rat model, pulmonary hypertension in MCT-PAH rats is associated
with sustained pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction (Oka et al, 2008). The pulmonary
artery isolated from this model provides a suitable functional system in which to evaluate
vasorelaxant properties of test compounds. Dysfunction of both the ET-1 and
adrenergic systems underlie the development of PAH (Rubens et al, 2001; Salvi, 1999),
and circulating levels of ET-1 and catecholamines are significantly increased in the MCT
rat model of PAH (Clozel et al, 2006). Thus, the current study measured the ability of
ACT-333679 and treprostinil to relax pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats and control
pulmonary artery precontracted with ET-1 or the α-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine.
The expression levels of mRNA encoding prostanoid receptors in the MCT rat model of
PAH were also analyzed to provide a molecular mechanistic explanation for potential
differences in arterial reactivity to the test compounds.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
9
The data presented here highlight the importance of IP receptor selectivity for full
vasorelaxant efficacy of IP receptor agonists under pathological conditions associated
with PAH. Selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679 exert full relaxant efficacy,
whereas the ability of treprostinil to evoke pulmonary arterial vasorelaxation is
significantly diminished in disease. The limited relaxant efficacy of treprostinil observed
in this study may result from co-activation of contractile EP3 receptors, which are up-
regulated in the MCT rat model of PAH. Potentiation of EP3 receptor-mediated
contraction by subthreshold concentrations of pathological mediators (ET-1 and
catecholamines) in control pulmonary arteries substantiates the impact of this contractile
mechanism in disease development.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
10
METHODS
Animals. Male Wistar rats (12 wks) were obtained from Harlan Laboratories B.V.
(Venray, Netherlands). All rats were housed in climate-controlled conditions with a 12 h
light/dark cycle and had free access to normal pelleted rat chow and drinking water in
accordance with local guidelines (Basel-Landschaft cantonal veterinary office). In
certain experiments, PAH was induced in rats by a single injection of monocrotaline
(MCT; 60 mg/kg, i.p.). Vehicle control rats were treated in parallel. Disease was
allowed to progress for thirty days before experimentation (Iglarz et al, 2008).
Development of disease was confirmed by an increase in the weight of right ventricle
(RV/LV+S ratio: control versus MCT-PAH, 0.33 ± 0.03 g versus 0.81 ± 0.1 g, P < 0.05)
and endothelial dysfunction as measured by attenuated relaxation to acetylcholine (pEC50
values: control versus MCT-PAH, 7.23 ± 0.04 versus 6.06 ± 0.13, P < 0.0001; Emax
values: control versus MCT-PAH, 82.33 ± 1.73 % versus 39.79 ± 5.26 %, P < 0.0001).
Rat isolated pulmonary artery. Following euthanasia by CO2 asphyxiation, rings of
extralobar (EPA) and intralobar (IPA) pulmonary artery were prepared from rats using
standard techniques. Two or four arterial rings, EPA (1.5 mm) and IPA (1.0 mm),
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
11
respectively, were prepared from each animal. Vessels were suspended between stainless
wires in either a standard tissue bath set-up (EPA) or a Mulvany-Halpern myograph
system (IPA) containing modified Krebs-Henseleit buffer (10 ml) of the following
composition (mM): NaCl 115; KCl 4.7; MgSO4 1.2; KH2PO4 1.5; CaCl2 2.5; NaHCO3
25; glucose 10. Care was taken to avoid damage to the endothelium during preparation
of arterial rings. In certain experiments, the vascular endothelium was removed by
abrasion with the tip of a watchmaker’s forceps. Bathing solution was maintained at
37oC and aerated with 95%O2/ 5%CO2/ (pH7.4). An initial resting force of 4.9 mN
(EPA) or 3.9 mN (IPA) was applied to vessels, and changes in force generation were
measured using an isometric force recorder (Multi Wire Myograph System Model 610 M
Version 2.2, DMT A/S, Aarhus, Denmark) coupled to a EMKA data acquisition system
(EMKA Technologies Inc, Paris, France). Viability of the pulmonary artery was tested
by measuring contraction to KCl (60 mM) and the presence of a functional endothelium
confirmed by measuring the ability of acetylcholine 10-5 M to relax arterial rings
contracted with phenylephrine (10-6 M; EPA) or U46619 (10-6 M; IPA).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
12
Experimental protocols
Relaxation of pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats: rings of pulmonary
artery were contracted with prostaglandin F2α (10-5 M). When the developed force had
stabilized, cumulative concentration-relaxation curves to selexipag, ACT-333679,
beraprost or treprostinil were obtained. The interval between additions of higher
concentrations of compounds to the baths was determined by the time required for the
response to reach plateau.
Relaxation of pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 or phenylephrine: rings of EPA and
IPA, in the presence or absence of endothelium, were contracted with either ET-1 (3 x 10-
10 M) or phenylephrine (1-3 x 10-6 M) before obtaining cumulative concentration-
relaxation curves to ACT-333679 and treprostinil.
Contraction of pulmonary artery: cumulative concentration-contraction curves to the
EP3/EP1 receptor agonist sulprostone were obtained in rings of EPA from control and
MCT-PAH rats. Separate experiments measured the contractile responses of normal EPA
and IPA to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. In experiments that sought to characterize the
identity of the receptor mediating contraction to test compounds, rings of normal IPA
were exposed to either drug vehicle or receptor antagonists for 20 minutes prior to
obtaining cumulative concentration-response curves to agonists. The choice and
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
13
concentrations of receptor antagonists were based on published data. The following
receptor antagonists were used: DBTSA (EP3 receptor; Gallant et al, 2002, Kuwano et al,
2008); SC51322 (EP1 receptor; McCormick et al, 2010) and GR32191 (TP receptor;
Lumley et al 1989).
Measurement of receptor mRNA expression.
Prostanoid receptor mRNA expression was measured by QPCR in arteries from normal
and MCT-PAH Wistar rats. Analyses were performed using the main, left and right
branches of the pulmonary artery, thoracic aorta and the 2nd branch of the mesenteric
artery. Total RNA was isolated from arteries (30 mg samples) using the RNeasy micro
fibrous tissue kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (QIAGEN, Germany).
Remaining genomic DNA was digested using the DNAse free kit (Ambion, USA). The
quantity of RNA was analyzed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher,
USA) and RNA quality was assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, USA). Total
RNA was reverse transcribed with the high capacity cDNA archive kit (Applied
Biosystems, USA). QPCR was performed on an ABI 7500 machine using TaqMan
probes (Applied Biosystems, USA). The following TaqMan assays from Applied
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
14
Biosystems were used for mRNA detection: IP-Rn01764022_m1, DP-Rn04223963_g1,
EP1-Rn01432713_s1, EP3-Rn0121735_m1, TP-Rn00690601_m1 and for normalization
18s-4319413E, B2M-Rn00560865_m1 and GUS-Rn00566655_m1. Results were
calculated using the delta delta cT method, which allows comparison between gene
expression values for different genes based on an identical linear scale. A value of 1 is
defined as no expression. Final results are presented as the PAH:control rat ratio.
Materials. Selexipag, ACT-333679 and DBTSA ((2E)-3-(3',4'-dichlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-
N-(2-thienylsulfonyl)acrylamide) were synthesized by Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd (Kyoto,
Japan). Beraprost, treprostinil, SC51322 and sulprostone were obtained from Cayman
Chemical. Acetylcholine, GR32191B, phenylephrine, and prostaglandin F2α were
purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA).
Statistical evaluation of results. Responses of rat pulmonary artery to test compounds
are expressed either as a percentage of the precontraction, or of the reference contraction
to KCl (60 mM). Contraction to phenylephrine and ET-1 is measured in mN. Results are
presented as mean ± S.E.M. In some experiments, the SEM values are smaller than the
data symbol. n values refer to the number of animals. pEC50 values are defined as the
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
15
negative logarithm of the concentration of agonist that evokes half maximal response.
The effects of receptor antagonists on responses of pulmonary artery to analogs of PGI2
were quantified by comparing calculated areas under the agonist concentration-response
curves in the absence and presence of antagonists. Statistical comparisons between
control and treated groups were performed using either student's paired t test or student’s
unpaired t test (two-tailed). Significance was accepted at P < 0.05.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
16
RESULTS
Selexipag/ACT-333679, but not prostacyclin analogs, relax pulmonary artery from
MCT-PAH rats
The abilities of selexipag, metabolite ACT-333679, and the analogs of prostacyclin,
beraprost and treprostinil, to relax rat pulmonary artery were measured. Arterial rings
from control and MCT-PAH rats were contracted to equal degrees with PGF2α (10-5 M)
(control versus MCT-PAH, P > 0.05). Selexipag and ACT-333679 evoked
concentration-dependent relaxation of EPA rings contracted with PGF2α (10-5 M).
Relaxation was similar in EPA from control and MCT-PAH rats (table 1 and figure 1)
(areas under curves, P > 0.05). Beraprost and treprostinil evoked concentration-
dependent relaxation of control rat EPA, but Emax values were significantly less than that
measured in response to selexipag and ACT-333679 (table 1 and figure 1). Similarly,
relaxation of EPA from MCT-PAH rats to beraprost and treprostinil was significantly
reduced compared to control EPA (table 1 and figure 1) (areas under curves: beraprost,
P < 0.05, treprostinil, P < 0.0001). In particular, relaxation to treprostinil was abolished
in EPA from MCT-PAH rats.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
17
ACT-333679, but not treprostinil, relaxes pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1
ET-1 is a key mediator in the development of PAH (Rubens et al, 2001; Clozel et al,
2006). Thus, the ability of ACT-333679 and treprostinil to evoke vasorelaxation of
pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 was measured both in the presence and absence of
functional endothelium. Rings of EPA and IPA from normal rats were contracted with
ET-1 (3 x 10-10 M) and when tone had stabilized, cumulative concentration-response
curves to ACT-333679 and treprostinil were obtained. Contraction to ET-1 was similar
in the presence or absence of endothelium within each pulmonary artery group (table 2).
ACT-333679 evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of normal EPA and IPA rings
(table 3 and figure 2). In contrast, treprostinil did not evoke relaxation of either EPA or
IPA rings, even at the highest concentration tested (table 3 and figure 2). Removal of
the endothelium did not influence the responsiveness of EPA and IPA rings to treprostinil.
Removal of endothelial cells in IPA, however, caused a small but statistically significant
decrease in the pEC50 value for ACT-333679 (table 3).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
18
ACT-333679, but not treprostinil, relaxes pulmonary artery contracted with
phenylephrine
Hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is reported in PAH (Haneda et al,
1983; Salvi, 1999; Nagaya et al, 2000; Velez-Roa et al, 2004), and circulating levels of
catecholamines are increased in the MCT model of PAH (Clozel et al, 2006).
Vasorelaxation of EPA and IPA rings to ACT-333679 and treprostinil, in the presence
and absence of endothelium, was therefore measured following contraction of rings with
the α1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. ACT-333679 evoked concentration-
dependent relaxation of normal EPA and IPA rings contracted with phenylephrine,
whereas treprostinil did not evoke relaxation (table 3 and figure 3). Removal of the
endothelium did not influence the responsiveness of EPA and IPA rings to treprostinil. A
small but statistically significant decrease in the pEC50 value for ACT-333679 was
measured upon removal of the endothelium in IPA (table 3), but no significant
differences in responses of IPA, with or without endothelium, were observed over the full
range of concentrations tested (areas under curve: with and without endothelium, P >
0.05).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
19
Sulprostone contracts pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats
The potential role of EP3 receptors in modulating vasoreactivity of the pulmonary artery
from MCT-induced PAH rats was investigated. First, the ability of the selective EP3
receptor agonist sulprostone to contract rat EPA from control and MCT-PAH rats was
measured. Sulprostone evoked concentration-dependent contraction of EPA which was
significantly more pronounced in rings from MCT-PAH compared to control rats (figure
4) (Emax values control versus MCT-PAH: 62.7 ± 7.8 % versus 168.5 ± 20.6 %, P <
0.001).
Differential expression of prostanoid receptors from control and MCT-PAH rats
The expression profile of prostanoid receptors in pulmonary artery from control and
MCT-PAH rats was measured (figure 5). TP and EP1 showed the highest basal
expression, IP and EP3 a moderate expression and DP1 a low expression (data not
shown). mRNA which encoded the IP receptor was significantly increased in all
segments of pulmonary artery analyzed from MCT-PAH rats (P < 0.01). Similarly, EP3
was significantly upregulated in the main branch of MCT-PAH pulmonary artery (P <
0.05). In contrast, DP1 (P < 0.05), EP1 (P < 0.001) and TP (P < 0.01) were significantly
downregulated in arteries from MCT-PAH rats.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
20
Effect of threshold concentration of ET-1 on contraction of pulmonary artery to
sulprostone
Since the function of the EP3 receptor subtype appears to be increased in pulmonary
artery from MCT-PAH rats, the influence of ET-1 on contraction of control pulmonary
artery to sulprostone was measured. Sulprostone and ET-1 each evoked concentration-
dependent contraction of rat EPA (figure 6; sulprostone: pEC50 5.0 ± 0.4, Emax 37.9 ±
8.3 %; ET-1: pEC50 9.6 ± 0.09, Emax 131.9 ± 4.3 %). Next, the effect of the threshold
concentration of ET-1 on contraction of rat EPA to a threshold concentration of
sulprostone was tested. Sulprostone (3 x 10-6 M) alone evoked a small contraction of rat
EPA (3.9 ± 0.9 %) (figure 6). Addition of sulprostone after an initial exposure of EPA to
the threshold concentration of ET-1 (10-10 M, contraction 2.5 ± 0.6 %), evoked a
significantly greater contraction than that observed in the absence of ET-1 (66.0 ±
11.2 %; P < 0.05) (figure 6). Similar data were obtained when sulprostone was
combined with a threshold concentration of phenylephrine (10-8 M) in rat EPA (data not
shown).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
21
EP1, EP3 and TP receptors and contraction of pulmonary artery from control rats
Contraction of normal rat EPA and IPA to ACT-333679 and treprostinil was measured.
ACT-333679 did not contract rings of pulmonary artery, whereas treprostinil evoked
concentration-dependent contraction of both EPA and IPA. Contraction to treprostinil
was more pronounced in IPA than in EPA rings (EPA: Emax 22.5 ± 5.8 %, IPA: Emax 62.8
± 11.9 %) (figure 7). The EP3 receptor antagonist DBTSA (3 x 10-6 M) abolished
contraction of rat IPA to treprostinil (figure 7). The EP1 receptor antagonist SC51322
(10-6 M) had no effect on contraction of IPA to treprostinil (control versus treated: pEC50,
4.8 ± 0.15 versus 4.8 ± 0.15, P > 0.05; Emax, 52.5 ± 5.5 % versus 50.8 ± 5.6 %, P > 0.05).
Similarly, antagonism of TP receptors with GR32191B (10-6 M) did not significantly
inhibit contraction to treprostinil (control versus treated: pEC50, 4.5 ± 0.4 versus 4.5 ± 0.3,
P > 0.05; Emax, 34.8 ± 11.3 % versus 22.0 ± 5.2 %, P > 0.05).
EP3 receptors and relaxation of IPA from normal rats
The influence of DBTSA on the relaxant response of rat IPA to treprostinil was next
measured. Rings of IPA, in the absence or presence of DBTSA, were contracted to the
same level with ET-1 (control versus DBTSA groups, 3.08 ± 0.5 mN versus 2.8 ± 0.6 mN,
P > 0.05). In the absence of DBTSA, treprostinil evoked minimal relaxation of IPA
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
22
(figure 8). Antagonism of EP3 receptors with DBTSA, however, revealed a significant
concentration-dependent relaxation of rat IPA to treprostinil (figure 8) (control versus
treated: areas under curves, P < 0.05).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
23
DISCUSSION
Selexipag and the active metabolite ACT-333679 can be distinguished from analogs of
PGI2 based on vasorelaxant efficacy in the rat pulmonary artery. Specifically, both
selexipag and ACT-333679, but not the PGI2 analog treprostinil, evoke concentration-
dependent relaxation of pulmonary artery under pathological conditions associated with
PAH. Increased expression of mRNA which encodes EP3 receptors and enhanced
pharmacological activity of this receptor subtype are measured in pulmonary artery from
the MCT rat model of PAH, but do not influence the relaxant efficacy of the selective IP
receptor agonist ACT-333679. The limited vasorelaxant efficacy of treprostinil was
partially restored following EP3 receptor blockade, indicating that co-activation of
contractile EP3 receptors attenuates the relaxant action of treprostinil.
ACT-333679 is highly selective for the human IP receptor (Kuwano et al, 2007).
The Ki value for ACT-333679 at the IP receptor is 130-fold lower than that at other
prostanoid receptors. The affinity values for ACT-333679 at the rat IP receptor is 2.2 x
10-7 M, and would be expected to activate IP receptors at the concentrations used in the
current study. Treprostinil, however, is a non-selective agonist at prostanoid receptors
(Whittle et al, 2012). In particular, treprostinil binds and activates DP1 and EP2 receptors
in addition to the IP receptor. Treprostinil regulates macrophage function and promotes
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
24
survival of bacteria via an EP2 receptor-dependent mechanism (Aronoff et al, 2007).
Also, treprostinil activates contractile EP3 receptors in gastric (Morrison et al, 2010) and
vascular smooth muscle (Orie and Clapp, 2011).
The relaxant response to ACT-333679 was similar in pulmonary artery from
control and MCT-PAH rats. These data confirm previous findings (Kuwano et al, 2008).
In contrast, treprostinil evoked weaker relaxation than ACT-333679 in pulmonary artery
from control rats, and failed to relax pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. Diminished
relaxation of pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats to iloprost and beraprost has been
reported (Kuwano et al, 2008), but treprostinil appears to be particularly sensitive to the
pathological conditions associated with PAH. This possibility was further examined in
experiments that measured the relaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 and treprostinil in
pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 or the α1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine.
Dysfunction of both the ET-1 and adrenergic systems underlie the progression of PAH
(Rubens et al, 2001; Salvi, 1999), and circulating levels of ET-1 and catecholamines are
significantly increased in the rat MCT-PAH model (Clozel et al, 2006). The relaxant
profile of ACT-333679 and treprostinil was remarkably similar to that observed in MCT-
PAH rats: ACT-333679 evoked concentration-dependent relaxation of all arterial rings
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
25
tested, whereas treprostinil was unable to relax pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1 or
phenylephrine.
Treprostinil can activate contractile EP3 receptors that counter the vasorelaxant
properties of the drug (Orie and Clapp, 2011). Contraction evoked by the selective EP3
receptor agonist sulprostone (e.g. Dong et al, 1986) is significantly greater in pulmonary
artery from MCT-PAH rats than in control rats, and is consistent with previous findings
(Kuwano et al, 2008). Hyper-responsiveness of the MCT-PAH pulmonary artery to
sulprostone may reflect an increase in the number of EP3 receptors. Receptor density is a
key determinant of both potency and efficacy of an agonist (Neubig et al, 2003).
Molecular analyses of pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats revealed a
modest but statistically significant up-regulation of the expression of mRNA encoding
EP3 receptors in the disease condition. Thus, both expression and pharmacological
activity of contractile EP3 receptors are enhanced in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH
rats. A differential regulation of IP and TP receptor mRNA expression was also noted:
an up-regulation of IP receptor mRNA whereas down-regulation of mRNA encoding TP
receptors was recorded. These data are suggestive of a pharmacological compensatory
mechanism to combat disease progression through improved PGI2 signaling (IP receptor)
and diminished deleterious effects of TXA2 (TP receptor) (Christman et al, 1992; Tuder
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
26
et al, 1999). Published information on the regulation of prostanoid receptors in PAH is,
however, contradictory. Down-regulation in expression of IP receptors is reported in
pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) cultured from MCT-PAH rats (Lai et
al, 2008), and in PASMCs and non-defined lung tissue from human PAH patients (Lai et
al, 2008; Falcetti et al, 2010). In contrast, a genomewide RNA expression study did not
observe significant regulation of IP or EP3 receptor mRNA in lung tissue samples from
PAH patients (Rajkumar et al., 2010). Differences in observations between studies may
reflect the experimental approaches adopted. For example, in the present study receptor
mRNA was measured in arterial blood vessels that were directly isolated from MCT-
PAH rats. An additional cell culture stage was included in previous work and may have
incurred changes in receptor expression (e.g. Boess et al, 2003). Also, non-vascular
components in snap-frozen lung tissue may have altered the receptor expression profile.
Despite the variability of results, any potential changes in expression of IP receptors
should affect the interaction with selexipag and treprostinil equally, since both drugs bind
the human IP receptor with similar affinity (Ki values, 2 x 10-8 M and 3.2 x 10-8 M,
respectively) (Kuwano et al, 2007; Whittle et al, 2012). Vascular responsiveness to a
non-selective prostanoid receptor agonist, such as treprostinil, however, may be more
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
27
susceptible to changes in the overall expression pattern and pharmacological activity of
prostanoid receptors.
Increased pharmacological activity of the EP3 receptor was also evident in
combination experiments that measured contraction to sulprostone and ET-1 or
phenylephrine in pulmonary arteries isolated from control rats. Contraction of pulmonary
artery to sulprostone was significantly augmented in the presence of a threshold
concentration of ET-1 or phenylephrine, and raises the possibility of a synergistic
interaction between the EP3 and endothelin and adrenergic receptor systems. Contractile
synergism between ET-1 and serotonin is reported in the human mammary artery (Yang
et al, 1990), and significant synergy exists between the α-adrenoceptor and EP3 receptors
in rat femoral artery (Hung et al, 2006). Co-activation of EP3 receptors under
pathological conditions of PAH may limit the therapeutic efficacy of treprostinil. The
current study and other work (Orie and Clapp, 2011) demonstrate a clear role for the EP3
receptor subtype in vasoconstriction to treprostinil. The beneficial effects of IP receptor
signaling on vascular wall remodeling in PAH can potentially be tempered by excessive
vasoconstriction. Indeed, the EP3 receptor mediates contraction of human pulmonary
artery (Qian et al, 1994; Walch et al, 1999; Maddox et al, 1985; Haye-Legrand et al,
1987; Norel et al, 1991), and may modulate relaxant IP receptor function (Jones et al,
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
28
1997; Chan and Jones, 2004). Also, EP3 receptor signaling is pro-fibrotic (White et al,
2008; Bozyk and Moore, 2011; Harding and LaPointe, 2011) and may limit the beneficial
effects of treprostinil in PAH.
Failure of treprostinil to evoke relaxation of the pulmonary artery from MCT-
PAH rats may not be fully explained by the small down-regulation of mRNA encoding
relaxant DP1 receptors in this model. A role for EP2 receptors can similarly be
discounted since no change in expression of mRNA encoding this receptor subtype is
measured in MCT-PAH rats (Lai et al, 2008). Indeed, agonism at DP1 and EP2 receptors
does not evoke relaxation of human pulmonary artery (Walch et al, 1999).
The vasorelaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 measured here in rat pulmonary artery
ex vivo reflects the high selectivity of this compound for the relaxant IP receptor
(Kuwano et al, 2007). Further, vasorelaxation evoked by ACT-333679 under
pathological conditions associated with PAH (absence of endothelium, ET-1 and α-
adrenoceptor stimulation) supports the therapeutic profile of selexipag for the treatment
of PAH. The combined vasodilator and anti-proliferative properties of ACT-333679
(Kuwano et al, 2007, 2008) likely lead to the prolonged survival of MCT-PAH rats
(Kuwano et al, 2008) and contribute to the significant decrease in pulmonary vascular
resistance in patients with PAH (Simonneau et al, 2012). In contrast, the present data
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
29
suggest that the therapeutic benefits of treprostinil in the management of PAH may not be
attributed solely to direct vasodilatation. Indeed, only a small, but statistically significant,
reduction in RVSP is reported in the MCT-PAH rat (Yang et al, 2010). Infusion of
treprostinil in a therapeutic regimen effectively prevents smooth muscle proliferation and
progression of PAH in the rat MCT-PAH model (Yang et al, 2010), although the impact
on survival is not reported. Also, treprostinil exerts anti-proliferative effects via an IP-
receptor dependent mechanism in a recombinant cell system (Falcetti et al, 2007).
In conclusion, these data demonstrate that selexipag/ACT-333679 and treprostinil
differ in their vasorelaxant effects in pulmonary artery. Selexipag/ACT-333679 relax
pulmonary artery under conditions associated with PAH whereas treprostinil fails to
evoke relaxation. The relaxant efficacy of treprostinil is dependent on the nature of the
agonist used to contract the pulmonary artery, and is also attenuated by off-target
agonism at EP3 receptors. Thus, a high degree of selectivity for the target IP receptor
may help maintain therapeutic efficacy and minimize unwanted side-effects of IP
receptor agonists.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
30
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Marie Schnoebelen for technical assistance.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
31
AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS
Participated in research design: Morrison, Studer, Kauser and Clozel
Conducted experiments: Studer, Ernst and Haag
Performed data analysis: Morrison, Studer, Ernst and Haag
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Morrison, Studer, Kauser and
Clozel
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
32
REFERENCES
Aronoff DM, Peres CM, Serezani CH, Ballinger MN, Carstens JK, Coleman N, Moore
BB, Peebles RS, Faccioli LH and Peters-Golden M (2007) Synthetic prostacyclin analogs
differentially regulate macrophage function via distinct analog-receptor binding
specificities. J Immunol 178: 1628-1634.
Boess F, Kamber M, Romer S, Gasser R, Muller D, Albertini S and Suter L (2003) Gene
expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices
compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats: possible implications for
toxicogenomics. Use of in vitro systems. Tox Sci 73: 386-402.
Bozyk PD and Moore BB (2011) Prostaglandin E2 and the pathogenesis of pulmonary
fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 45: 445-452.
Chan KM and Jones RL (2004) Partial agonism of taprostene at prostanoid IP receptors
in vascular preparations from guinea-pig, rat and mouse. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 43:
795-807.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
33
Christman BW, McPherson CD, Newman JH, King GA, Bernard GR, Groves BM and
Loyd JE (1992) An imbalance between the excretion of thromboxane and prostacyclin
metabolites in pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 327: 70-75.
Clozel M, Hess P, Rey M, Iglarz M, Binkert C and Qiu C (2006) Bosentan, sildenafil,
and their combination in the monocrotaline model of pulmonary hypertension in rats.
Exp Biol Med 231: 967-973.
Dong YJ, Jones RL, and Wilson NH (1986) Prostaglandin E receptor subtypes in smooth
muscle: agonist activities of stable prostacyclin analogues. Br J Pharmacol 87: 97-107.
Falcetti E, Flavell DM, Staels B, Tinker A, Haworth SG and Clapp LH (2007) IP
receptor-dependent activation of PPARγ by stable prostacyclin analogues. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun 360: 821-827.
Falcetti E, Hall SM, Phillips PG, Patel J, Morrell NW, Haworth SG and Clapp LH (2010)
Smooth muscle proliferation and role of the prostacyclin (IP) receptor in idiopathic
pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182: 1161-1170.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
34
Forrest AS, Hennig GW, Jokela-Willis S, Park CD, and Sanders KM (2009)
Prostaglandin regulation of gastric slow waves and peristalsis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest
Liver Physiol 296: G1180-G1190.
Gallant M, Carrière MC, Chateauneuf A, Denis D, Gareau Y, Godbout C, Greig G,
Juteau H, Lachance N, Lacombe P, Lamontagne S, Metters KM, Rochette C, Ruel R,
Slipetz D, Sawyer N, Tremblay N, and Labelle M (2002) Structure-activity relationship
of biaryl acylsulfonamide analogues on the human EP3 prostanoid receptor. Bioorg Med
Chem Letts 12: 2583-2586.
Gomberg-Maitland M and Olschewski H (2008) Prostacyclin therapies for the treatment
of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 31: 891-901.
GRIPHON Phase 3 clinical trial, ACT-293987 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
US National Institutes of Health. ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. NCT01106014. Available
from URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
35
Haneda T, Nakajima T, Shirato K, Onodera S and Takishima T (1983) Effects of oxygen
breathing on pulmonary vascular input impedance in patients with pulmonary
hypertension. Chest 83: 520-527.
Harding P and LaPointe MC (2011) Prostaglandin E2 increases cardiac fibroblast
proliferation and increases cyclin D expression via EP1 receptor. Prostaglandins Leukot
Essent Fatty Acids 84: 147-152.
Haye-Legrand I, Bourdillat B, Labat C, Cerrina J, Norel X, Benveniste J and Brink C
(1987) Relaxation of isolated human pulmonary muscle preparations with prostacyclin
(PGI2) and its analogs. Prostaglandins 33: 845-854.
Hung GHY, Jones RL, Lam FFY, Chan KM, Hidaka H, Suzuki M and Sasaki Y (2006)
Investigation of the pronounced synergism between prostaglandin E2 and other
constrictor agents on rat femoral artery. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 74:
401-415.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
36
Iglarz M, Binkert C, Morrison K, Fischli W, Gatfield J, Treiber A, Weller T, Bolli MH,
Boss C, Buchmann S, Capeleto B, Hess P, Qiu C and Clozel M (2008) Pharmacology of
macitentan, an orally active tissue-targeting dual endothelin receptor antagonist. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 327: 736-745.
Jones RL, Qian Y, Wise H, Wong HNC, Lam W, Chan H, Yim APC and Ho JKS (1997)
Relaxant actions of nonprostanoid prostacyclin mimetics on human pulmonary artery. J
Cardiovasc Pharmacol 29: 525-535.
Kan KK, Jones RL, Ngan MP and Rudd JA (2002) Actions of prostanoids to induce
emesis and defecation in the ferret. Eur J Pharmacol 453: 299-308.
Kuwano K, Hashino A, Asaki T, Hamamoto T, Yamada T, Okubo K, and Kuwabara K
(2007) 2-{4-[(5,6-Diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-
(methylsulfonyl)acetamide (NS-304), an orally available and long-acting prostacyclin
receptor agonist prodrug. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 322: 1181-1188.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
37
Kuwano K, Hashino A, Noda K, Kosugi K, and Kuwabara K (2008) A long-acting and
highly selective prostacyclin receptor agonist prodrug, 2-{4-[(5,6-Diphenylpyrazin-2-
yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide (NS-304), ameliorates rat
pulmonary hypertension with unique relaxant responses of its active form, {4-[(5,6-
Diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy} acetic acid (MRE-269), on rat
pulmonary artery. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326: 691-699.
Lai YJ, Pullamsetti SS, Dony E, Weissmann N, Butrous G, Banat GA, Ghofrani HA,
Seeger W, Grimminger F and Schermuly RT (2008) Role of the prostanoid EP4 receptor
in iloprost-mediated vasodilatation in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med 178: 188-196.
Lumley P, White BP, and Humphrey PPA (1989) GR32191, a highly potent and specific
thromboxane A2 receptor blocking drug on platelets and vascular and airways smooth
muscle in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 97: 783-794.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
38
Maddox Y, Cunard CM, Shapiro R, Kawaguchi A, Goldman M, Lower RR and Ramwell
PW (1985) A comparison of the contractile responses of rodent and human pulmonary
vascular segments to eicosanoids. In Prostaglandins, leukotrienes and lipoxins ed by J
Martyn Bailey, pp 267-272, Plenum Press, New York
McCormick C, Jones RL, Kennedy S, and Wadsworth RM (2010) Activation of
prostanoid EP receptors by prostacyclin analogues in rabbit iliac artery: implications for
anti-restenotic potential. Eur J Pharmacol 641: 160-167.
Minami T, Nakano H, Kobayashi T, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S
and Ito S (2001) Characterization of EP receptor subtypes responsible for prostaglandin
E2-induced pain responses by use of EP1 and EP3 receptor knockout mice. Br J
Pharmacol 133: 438-444.
Morrison K, Ernst R, Hess P, Studer R and Clozel M (2010) Selexipag: a selective
prostacyclin receptor agonist that does not affect rat gastric function. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther 335: 249-255.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
39
Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Uematsu M, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Kakishita M,
Fukushima K, Okano Y, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K and Kangawa K (2000) Plasma brain
natriuretic peptide as a prognostic indicator in patients with primary pulmonary
hypertension . Circulation 102: 865-870.
Neubig RR, Spedding M, Kenakin T and Christopoulos A (2003) International Union of
Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII.
Update on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 55: 597-606.
Norel X, Labat C, Gardiner PJ and Brink C (1991) Inhibitory effects of BAY u3405 on
prostanoid-induced contractions in human isolated bronchial and pulmonary arterial
muscle preparations. Br J Pharmacol 104: 591-595.
Oka M, Fagan KA, Jones PL and McMurtry IF (2008) Therapeutic potential of
RhoA/Rho kinase inhibitors in pulmonary hypertension. Br J Pharmacol 155: 444-454.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
40
Orie NN and Clapp LH (2011) Role of prostanoid IP and EP receptors in mediating
vasorelaxant responses to PGI2 analogues in rat tail artery: evidence for Gi/o modulation
via EP3 receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 654: 258-265.
Pal A, Brasseur JG and Abrahamsson B (2007) A stomach road or "Magenstrasse" for
gastric emptying. J Biomechanics 40: 1202-1210.
Qian Y, Jones RL, Chan K, Stock AI and Ho JKS (1994) Potent contractile actions of
prostanoid EP3-receptor agonists on human isolated pulmonary artery Br J Pharmacol
113: 369-374.
Rajkumar R, Konishi K, Richards TJ, Ishizawar DC, Wiechert AC, Kaminski N and
Ahmad F (2010) Genomewide RNA expression profiling in lung identifies distinct
signatures in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and secondary pulmonary
hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H1235–H1248.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
41
Rubens C, Ewert R, Halank M, Wensel R, Orzechowski HD, Schultheiss HP and
Hoeffken G (2001) Big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 plasma levels are correlated with
the severity of primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 120: 1562-1569.
Salvi SS (1999) α1-adrenergic hypothesis for pulmonary hypertension. Chest 115: 1708-
1719.
Simonneau G, Barst RJ, Galie N et al (2002) Continuous subcutaneous infusion of
treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension : a
double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:
800-804.
Simonneau G, Torbicki A, Hoeper MM, Delcroix M, Karlócai K, Galiè N, Degano B,
Bonderman D, Kurzyna M, Efficace M, Giorgino R and Lang IM (2012). Selexipag, an
oral, selective IP receptor agonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
ERJ Express. Published on February 23, 2012 as doi: 10.1183/09031936.00137511
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
42
Southall MD and Vasko MR (2001) Prostaglandin receptor subtypes, EP3C and EP4,
mediate the prostaglandin E2-induced cAMP production and sensitization of sensory
neurons. J Biol Chem 276:16083-16091.
Tapson VF, Gomberg-Maitland M, McLaughlin VV, Benza RL, Widlitz AC, Krichman
A and Barst RJ (2006) Safety and efficacy of IV treprostinil for pulmonary arterial
hypertension: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, 12-week trial. Chest 129: 683-688.
Tuder RM, Cool CD, Geraci MW, Wang J, Abman SH, Wright L, Badesch D, and
Voelkel NF (1999) Prostacyclin synthase expression is decreased in lungs from patients
with severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 1925-1932.
Tuder RM, Marecki JC, Richter A, Fijalkowska I and Flores S (2007) Pathology of
pulmonary hypertension. Clin Chest Med 28: 23-42.
Velez-Roa S, Ciarka A, Najem B, Vachiery JL, Naeije R and van de Borne P (2004)
Increased sympathetic nerve activity in pulmonary artery hypertension. Circulation 110:
1308-1312.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
43
Walch L, Labat C, Gascard JP, de Montpreville V, Brink C and Norel X (1999)
Prostanoid receptors involved in the relaxation of human pulmonary vessels. Br J
Pharmacol 126: 859-866.
White KE, Ding Q, Moore BB, Peters-Golden M, Ware LB, Matthay MA and Olman MA
(2008) Prostaglandin E2 mediates IL-1β-related fibroblast mitogenic effects in acute lung
injury through differential utilization of prostanoid receptors. J Immunol 180: 637-646.
Whittle BJ, Siverstein A, Mottola D and Clapp LH (2012) Binding and activity of the
prostacyclin receptor (IP) agonists, treprostinil and iloprost, at human prostanoid
receptors: Treprostinil is a potent DP1 and EP2 agonist. Biochem Pharmacol,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2012.03.012
Yang ZH, Richard V, von Segesser L, Bauer E, Stulz P, Turina M and Luscher TF (1990)
Threshold concentrations of endothelin-1 potentiate contractions to norepinephrine and
serotonin in human arteries. A new mechanism of vasospasm? Circulation 82: 188-195.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
44
Yang J, Li X, Al-Lamki RS, Southwood M, Zhao J, Lever AM, Grimminger F,
Schermuly RT and Morrell NW (2010) Smad-dependent and Smad-independent
induction of Id1 by prostacyclin analogues inhibits proliferation of pulmonary artery
smooth muscle cells in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res 107: 252-262.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
45
LEGENDS FOR FIGURES
Figure 1) Relaxation of pulmonary artery (EPA) from control and MCT-PAH rats to
selexipag (A), ACT-333679 (B), beraprost (C) and treprostinil (D). Rings of EPA were
contracted with PGF2α (10-5 M). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 4.
Figure 2) Relaxation of EPA (A and B) and IPA (C and D) in the presence and
absence of endothelium to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. EPA and IPA were contracted
with ET-1 (3 x 10-10 M). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 4.
Figure 3) Relaxation of EPA (A and B) and IPA (C and D) in the presence and
absence of endothelium to ACT-333679 and treprostinil. EPA and IPA were contracted
with phenylephrine (1-3 x 10-6 M). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 4.
Figure 4) Contraction of pulmonary artery (EPA) from control and MCT-PAH rats
to sulprostone. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 6.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
46
Figure 5) Expression of prostanoid receptors in pulmonary artery from control and
MCT-PAH rats. Data are expressed as the PAH:control rat ratio. S.E.M. values are
omitted for clarity; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; n = 6.
Figure 6) Contraction of rat pulmonary artery (EPA) to sulprostone and ET-1.
Concentration-dependent contraction of EPA to sulprostone (A) and ET-1 (B).
Representative traces of contractile responses of EPA to sulprostone (3 x 10-6 M) alone
(C) or in combination with ET-1 (10-10 M) (D). Quantification of contractile data shown
in traces (E). Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M.; * P < 0.05; n = 4.
Figure 7) Contraction of rat pulmonary artery to ACT-333679 and treprostinil.
Concentration-dependent contraction of EPA and IPA to ACT-333679 (A) and
treprostinil (B). DBTSA (3 x 10-6 M) inhibits contraction of IPA to treprostinil (C). Data
are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * P < 0.05; n = 4.
Figure 8) Effect of DBTSA (3 x 10-6 M) on relaxation of rat pulmonary artery (IPA,
with endothelium) to treprostinil. IPA was contracted with ET-1 (3 x 10-10 M). Data are
expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 4.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
47
TABLES
Table 1. Summary of relaxation data for selexipag, ACT-333679, beraprost and
treprostinil in pulmonary artery from control and MCT-PAH rats.
Selexipag
ACT-333679
beraprost
treprostinil
Control
pEC50
Emax
5.2 ± 0.1
98.4 ± 2.1
5.9 ± 0.1
102.3 ± 0.7
6.18 ± 0.2
81.1 ± 6.9*
6.88 ± 0.1
72.8 ± 3.7**
MCT-PAH
pEC50
Emax
4.9 ± 0.1
104.6 ± 2.4
5.5 ± 0.1
104.5 ± 1.0
4.7 ± 0.2
57.5 ± 7.8**
nd
4.3 ± 2.3***
Emax, % of reference contraction to KCl 60mM
*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001; ***, P < 0.0001 comparison with Emax value for ACT-333679
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
48
Table 2. Contraction of rat pulmonary artery to ET-1 and phenylephrine.
Contractile agent/
relaxant
EPA
IPA
With
endothelium
Without
endothelium
With
endothelium
Without
endothelium
ET-1/
ACT-333679
treprostinil
8.9 ± 1.3
8.1 ± 0.9
10.3 ± 1.1
10.5 ± 1.0
3.5 ± 0.4
2.7 ± 0.3
3.2 ± 0.3
2.8 ± 0.3
phenylephrine/
ACT-333679
treprostinil
5.5 ± 0.8
6.5 ± 0.9
7.6 ± 1.2
6.7 ± 0.5
3.1 ± 0.2
3.1 ± 0.1
2.8 ± 0.3
3.4 ± 0.2
Values, mN
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
JPET #197152
49
Table 3. Relaxant potency of ACT-333679 in rat pulmonary artery.
Contractile agent
EPA
IPA
With
endothelium
Without
endothelium
With
endothelium
Without
endothelium
ET-1
5.0 ± 0.3
4.8 ± 0.3
5.4 ± 0.2
4.5 ± 0.2*
phenylephrine
4.9 ± 0.1
4.7 ± 0.1
5.1 ± 0.2
4.5 ± 0.1*
Values, pEC50
* , P < 0.05, comparison between IPA with and without endothelium
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on August 23, 2012 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.197152
at ASPE
T Journals on O
ctober 3, 2020jpet.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from