tm 732 engr. economics for managers decision analysis

69
TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis Decision Analysis

Upload: chrystal-parker

Post on 06-Jan-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Prototype Ex. 2 Digger Construction is interested in purchasing 1 of 3 cranes. The cranes differ in capacity, age, and mechanical condition, but each is fully capable of performing the jobs expected. The firm anticipates a growing market and that there will be sufficient demand to justify each of the cranes. However, low, medium, and high growth estimates result in different cash flow profiles for each crane. Based on ATCF at 15%, the analyst estimates the following NPWs for each of the cranes for each of the growth market conditions.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

TM 732Engr. Economics for

ManagersDecision AnalysisDecision Analysis

Page 2: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

GoferBrokeAlternative Oil DryDrill fer Oil 700 -100Sell Land 90 90Chance 0.25 0.75

Page 3: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Prototype Ex. 2

Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000

Digger Construction is interested in purchasing 1 of 3 cranes. The cranes differ in capacity, age, and mechanical condition, but each is fully capable of performing the jobs expected. The firm anticipates a growing market and that there will be sufficient demand to justify each of the cranes. However, low, medium, and high growth estimates result in different cash flow profiles for each crane. Based on ATCF at 15%, the analyst estimates the following NPWs for each of the cranes for each of the growth market conditions.

Page 4: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Digger ConstructionPayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 5: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Decision Matrix

Decision Model for Lift TruckNo. Trucks Required

Alternatives 4 5 6 A1 - Lease 4 18,000 20,000 22,000 A2 - Lease 5 20,000 20,000 22,000 A3 - Lease 6 21,000 21,000 21,000 A4 - Buy 4 12,000 14,500 15,000 A5 - Buy 5 14,000 14,000 16,000 A6 - Buy 6 14,000 15,500 18,000

Probability 0.30 0.40 0.30

EUAW

Page 6: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Matrix Decision Model

p1 p2 -- pk -- pmS1 S2 -- Sk -- Sm

A1 V(11) V(12) -- V(1k) -- V(1m)A2 V(1) V(22) -- V(2k) -- V(2m) : : : : : : : : : :Aj V(j1) V(j2) -- V(jk) -- V(jm) : : : : : : : : : :An V(n1) V(n2) -- V(nk) -- V(nm)

Aj = alternative strategy j under decision makers controlSk = a state or possible future that can occur given Aj

pk = the probability state Sk will occur

Page 7: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Matrix Decision Model

p1 p2 -- pk -- pmS1 S2 -- Sk -- Sm

A1 V(11) V(12) -- V(1k) -- V(1m)A2 V(1) V(22) -- V(2k) -- V(2m) : : : : : : : : : :Aj V(j1) V(j2) -- V(jk) -- V(jm) : : : : : : : : : :An V(n1) V(n2) -- V(nk) -- V(nm)

V(jk) = the value of outcome jk (terms of $, time, distance, . . )jk = the outcome of choosing Aj and having state Sk occur

Page 8: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Decisions Under Certainty

p=1S

A1 V(1)A2 V() : : : :Aj V(j) : : : :An V(n)

Page 9: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Decisions Under Certainty

p=1S

A1 V(1)A2 V() : : : :Aj V(j) : : : :An V(n)

Investor wishes to invest $10,000 in one of five govt. securities. Effective yields are:

A1 = 8.0%A2 = 7.3%A3 = 8.7%A4 = 6.0%A5 = 6.5%

choose A3.

Page 10: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Maximin

Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative.

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 11: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Maximin

Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative.

Find the maximum of minimums Select Crane 1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Choose best alternative when comparing worst possible outcomes for each alternative.

Page 12: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Maximin

Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative.

Find the maximum of minimums Sell LandChoose best alternative when comparing worst possible outcomes for each alternative.

Alternative Oil DryDrill fer Oil 700 -100Sell Land 90 90Chance 0.25 0.75

Page 13: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

MiniMax

Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)e.g., Find the max payoff for each alternative.

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 14: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

MiniMax

Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)e.g., Find the max payoff for each alternative.

Find the minimum of maximums Select Crane 1

Choose worst alternative when comparing bestpossible outcomes for each alternative.

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 15: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

MiniMax

Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)e.g., Find the max payoff for each alternative.

Find the minimum of maximums Sell Land

Choose worst alternative when comparing best possible outcomes for each alternative.

Alternative Oil DryDrill fer Oil 700 -100Sell Land 90 90Chance 0.25 0.75

Page 16: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class ProblemProbability

Alternatives S1 S2 S3

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Choose best alternative usinga. Maximax criteria

b. Minimin criteria

Page 17: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class ProblemProbability

Alternatives S1 S2 S3

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Choose best alternative usinga. Maximax criteria (best of the best)

maxj{15163, 16536, 18397} = 18,397

choose A3

Page 18: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 S2 S3

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Class Problem

Choose best alternative usinga. Minimin criteria (worst of the worst)

minj{11,962 10,934 10,840} = 10,840

choose A3

Page 19: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Maximum LikelihoodPayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

Page 20: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Maximum LikelihoodPayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 21: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 22: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 23: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 24: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 25: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 26: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 27: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 28: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Most ProbablePayoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2, PA3 | p2 =1.0}

choose A1

Page 29: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Assume S2 a certainty

max{PA1, PA2| p2 =1.0}

choose A2

Maximun Likelihood Most Probable

Alternative Oil DryDrill fer Oil 700 -100Sell Land 90 90Chance 0.25 0.75

Page 30: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Bayes’ Decision Rule

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 31: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Bayes’ Decision Rule

E[A1] > E[A2]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Oil Dry ExpectationDrill fer Oil 700 -100 100Sell Land 90 90 90Chance 0.25 0.75

Page 32: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 33: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 34: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 35: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 36: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 37: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation

E[A1] > E[A2] > E[A3]

choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 38: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Laplace PrincipleIf one can not assign probabilities, assume each state equally probable.

Max E[PAi] choose A1

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 56,943Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 54,612Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 55,611Prob 0.333 0.333 0.333

Page 39: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Expectation-Variance

If E[A1] = E[A2] = E[A3]

choose Aj with min. variance

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. Expectation Variance

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 59,000 76,000,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 55,900 188,490,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 58,500 302,250,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

Page 40: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivity Payoff

Alternative Oil DryDrill fer Oil 700 -100Sell Land 90 90Chance p 1-p

Suppose probability of finding oil (p) is somewherebetween 15 and 35 percent.

Page 41: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivity

Suppose probability of finding oil (p) is somewherebetween 15 and 35 percent.

PayoffAlternative Oil Dry ExpectationDrill fer Oil 700 -100 20Sell Land 90 90 90Chance 0.15 0.85

Page 42: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivity

Suppose probability of finding oil (p) is somewherebetween 15 and 35 percent.

Alternative Oil Dry ExpectationDrill fer Oil 700 -100 180Sell Land 90 90 90Chance 0.35 0.65

Page 43: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivityp Drill Sell

0.15 20 900.35 180 90

Page 44: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivityp Drill Sell

0.15 20 900.35 180 90

Sensitivity Plot

0

50

100

150

200

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Prob. of Oil

Expe

cted

Val

ue

Drill

Sell

Page 45: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivity

We know E[payoff] = 700(p) -100(1-p) = 800p - 100

p Drill Sell0.15 20 900.35 180 90

Page 46: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Sensitivityp Drill Sell

0.15 20 900.35 180 90

Sensitivity Plot

0

50

100

150

200

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Prob. of Oil

Expe

cted

Val

ue

DrillSell

Page 47: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Aspiration-Level

Aspiration: max probability that payoff > 60,000

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

P{PA1 > 60,000} = 0.8P{PA2 > 60,000} = 0.3P{PA3 > 60,000} = 0.3

Choose A2 or A3

Page 48: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Aspiration-Level

Aspiration: max probability that payoff > 60,000

PayoffAlternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000Prob 0.2 0.5 0.3

P{PA1 > 60,000} = 0.8P{PA2 > 60,000} = 0.3P{PA3 > 60,000} = 0.3

Choose A2 or A3

Page 49: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class ProblemAspiration LevelProbability 0.1 0.3 0.6

Alternatives S1 S2 S3

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Determine alternative Aj if aspiration level is NPW > $14,000.

Page 50: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class ProblemAspiration LevelProbability 0.1 0.3 0.6

Alternatives S1 S2 S3

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Determine alternative Aj if aspiration level is Payoff > $14,000.

Page 51: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class ProblemAspiration LevelProbability 0.1 0.3 0.6

Alternatives S1 S2 S3

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Determine alternative Aj if aspiration level is Payoff > $14,000.

P{PA1 > 14,000} = 0.1P{PA2 > 14,000} = 0.1P{PA3 > 14,000} = 0.4 Choose A3

Page 52: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 53: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 54: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 55: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 56: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 57: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 58: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107

choose A3

Page 59: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle = 0.3

ProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 12,922A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 12,615A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 13,107

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

Note:= 1.0 MaxiMax

= 0.0 MaxiMin

Page 60: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz PrincipleProbability

Alternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% HjA1 15,163 13,409 11,962 15,163A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 16,536A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 18,397

= 1.0

MaxiMax = best of the best = max{maxkV(jk)}

max{15,163 16,536 18,397} = 18,397

choose A3

Page 61: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz PrincipleProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20% Hj

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840 10,840

= 0.0

MaxiMin = best of the worst = max{minkV(jk)} max{11,962 10,934 10,840} = 11,962 choose A1

Page 62: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class ProblemLow Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.

Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000

You personally assess your boss’s risk level to beapproximately .3. Use Hurwicz’s principle to analyze the value matrix and determine the appropriate alternative.

Page 63: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

= 0.3Payoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. HiCrane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 50,500Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 48,400Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 45,000Prob 0.333 0.333 0.333

Page 64: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{50500, 48400, 45000} = 50,500

= 0.3Payoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. HiCrane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 50,500Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 48,400Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 45,000Prob 0.333 0.333 0.333

Page 65: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Hurwicz Principle

Select j: maxj{Hj=maxk[V(jk)]+(1-)mink(V(jk)

max{50500, 48400, 45000} = 50,500

choose A1

= 0.3Payoff

Alternative Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr. HiCrane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000 50,500Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000 48,400Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000 45,000Prob 0.333 0.333 0.333

Page 66: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Savage Principle (Minimax Regret)Savage PrincipleProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20%

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Build table of regrets: Rjk = maxj[V(jk)] - V(jk)(max in each column less cell value)

Page 67: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Savage Principle (Minimax Regret)Savage PrincipleProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20%

A1 15,163 13,409 11,962A2 16,536 13,465 10,934A3 18,397 14,240 10,840

Table of RegretsProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20%

A1 3,234 831 0A2 1,861 775 1,028A3 0 0 1,122

Page 68: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Savage Principle (Minimax Regret)Table of RegretsProbabilityAlternatives S1 = 10% S2=15% S3=20%

A1 3,234 831 0A2 1,861 775 1,028A3 0 0 1,122

Minimize the maximum regret Min {3,234 1,861 1,122} = 1,122 choose A3

Page 69: TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

Class Problem

Being somewhat of a pessimist, you constantly worry about lost opportunities. Compute a regret matrix and determine an alternative which minimizes the maximum regret.

Low Gr Med. Gr. High Gr.Crane 1 43,000 60,000 68,000Crane 2 37,000 52,000 75,000Crane 3 30,000 57,000 80,000