tmd weekend edition092108

4
9/21/2008 9:06 PM Pacific The retracement of the 5 waves down from 1977 on a daily chart shows a possible 1:1 ratio a-b-c retracement that stopped at the .500 Fibonacci retracement level and clustered with the declining 20 period ma. Without any context of how this five wave set fits into a bigger picture, or, viewing an intra-day chart for corroboration, an argument can be made that we go lower from here. I will attempt to put this wave into context first. I don’t use line charts a lot with Ewp, but they do provide an advantage of showing closing values only. I look at them when there are huge spikes in the data to try and get a cleaner count and ratio. In the first line chart based on closing prices only, there is a possible 5 waves down, 3 up, and then a 5-3-5 zigzag. That is an uncommon but acceptable pattern, and at least opens the possibility that we could be finished going down. However, just by changing the count I can present the possibility that we still have a long way to go, and Prechter’s Revenge is still on the table. It would take a rally through 1963 to take Prechter’s Revenge off the table. Longer term context isn’t going to help much right now.

Upload: guest20ee0

Post on 16-Apr-2017

120 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tmd Weekend Edition092108

9/21/2008 9:06 PM Pacific

The retracement of the 5 waves down from 1977 on a daily chart shows a possible 1:1 ratio a-b-c retracement that stopped at the .500 Fibonacci retracement level and clustered with the declining 20 period ma. Without any context of how this five wave set fits into a bigger picture, or, viewing an intra-day chart for corroboration, an argument can be made that we go lower from here.

I will attempt to put this wave into context first. I don’t use line charts a lot with Ewp, but they do provide an advantage of showing closing values only. I look at them when there are huge spikes in the data to try and get a cleaner count and ratio. In the first line chart based on closing prices only, there is a possible 5 waves down, 3 up, and then a 5-3-5 zigzag. That is an uncommon but acceptable pattern, and at least opens the possibility that we could be finished going down. However, just by changing the count I can present the possibility that we still have a long way to go, and Prechter’s Revenge is still on the table. It would take a rally through 1963 to take Prechter’s Revenge off the table. Longer term context isn’t going to help much right now.

Page 2: Tmd Weekend Edition092108

9/21/2008 9:06 PM Pacific

Page 3: Tmd Weekend Edition092108

9/21/2008 9:06 PM Pacific

Below is a 60min chart of the NASDAQ e-mini futures at 11:15pm EST on 09/21. I definitely favor the count of 5 waves up from the 1612 low over the 5-3-5 retracement possibility previously shown on the daily chart. In my opinion the 5 wave count is pretty clean. Since 5 waves never travel alone except as the C wave of an expanded flat, and I don’t believe we just completed one of those, I place a high probability on another 5 waves up. The most pressing issue however, is whether or not we have completed the retracement of the first 5 waves. I can believe that we are finished, I can count a 5-3-5 wave set down from B with close to a 1:1 ratio, and the spike below a .618 extension of A stopping at the .500 retracement level of the entire move off the low. However, if B-C extends down, then the most probable target is then 1685, a 1:1 ratio of A, and a .618 retracement of the entire move off the low. I believe that either the current level or 1685 will complete the retracement.

Now I will go back to a daily chart to project where the next 5 waves could take us. I will be optimistic and assume that that 1705, the .500 retracement of the recent high holds through the night. That projects to the 1822 to 1838 zone created by a .618 extension of the first five waves, and the .618 retracement of the move from 1977 to 1612.

Page 4: Tmd Weekend Edition092108

9/21/2008 9:06 PM Pacific

TMD/DW The market detective provides personal market opinion based on sound technical analysis and research. However, no warranty is given or implied as to its true reliability. The market detective will make errors and mistakes. The market detective is not an investment adviser and is not making recommendations to buy, sell, or place orders relating to the futures contracts, ETFs, or stocks that he writes about. The responsibility for decisions made from information contained in this service are solely that of the individual subscriber. The individual must fully research and make his/her own decisions before acting on any information provided by the market detective. The market detective assumes no responsibility for subscriber investment or trading results.