tom peters’ we are in a brawl with no rules phoenix 24/november/2002

77
Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Upload: marvin-potter

Post on 30-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Tom Peters’

We Are in a Brawl with No

RulesPhoenix 24/November/2002

Page 2: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“We are in a

brawl with no rules.”

Paul Allaire

Page 3: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

I. Life, Death & the Digital Revolution

Page 4: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“IT MAY SOMEDAY BE SAID THAT THE 21ST CENTURY BEGAN ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. …

“Al-Qaeda represents a new and profoundly dangerous kind of

organization—one that might be called a ‘virtual state.’ In September a virtual state proved that modern societies are vulnerable as

never before.”—Time/09.09.2002

Page 5: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“The deadliest strength of America’s new adversaries is their very fluidity, Defense Secretary Donald

Rumsfeld believes. Terrorist networks, unburdened by fixed borders, headquarters or conventional forces, are

free to study the way this nation responds to threats and adapt themselves to prepare for what Mr. Rumsfeld is certain will be another attack. …

“ ‘Business as usual won’t do it,’ he said. His answer is to develop swifter, more lethal ways

to fight. ‘Big institutions aren’t swift on their feet in adapting but rather ponderous and clumsy

and slow.’ ”—The New York Times/09.04.2002

Page 6: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Our military structure today is essentially one

developed and designed by Napoleon.”

Admiral Bill Owens, former Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

Page 7: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“In an era when terrorists use satellite

phones and encrypted email, US gatekeepers stand armed against them with pencils

and paperwork, and archaic computer systems that don’t

talk to each other.”Boston Globe (09.30.2001)

Page 8: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“The organizations we created have become tyrants. They have taken

control, holding us fettered, creating barriers that hinder rather than help our businesses. The lines that we drew on our neat organizational diagrams have turned into walls

that no one can scale or penetrate or even peer over.” —Frank Lekanne Deprez &

René Tissen, Zero Space: Moving Beyond Organizational Limits.

Page 9: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Dawn Meyerreicks, CTO of the Defense Intelligence Systems Agency, made one of the most fateful military calls of the 21st century. After 9/11 … her office

quickly leased all the available transponders covering Central Asia. The implications should change everything about U.S. military thinking in the

years ahead.

“The U.S. Air Force had kicked off its fight against the Taliban with an ineffective bombing campaign, and Washington was anguishing over whether to send in a few Army divisions. Donald Rumsfeld told Gen. Tommy Franks to

give the initiative to 250 Special Forces already on the ground. They used satellite phones, Predator surveillance drones, and GPS- and laser-based

targeting systems to make the air strikes brutally effective.

“In effect, they ‘Napsterized’ the battlefield by cutting out the middlemen (much of the military’s command and control) and working directly with the

real players. … The data came in so fast that HQ revised operating procedures to allow intelligence analysts and attack planners to work directly

together. Their favorite tool, incidentally, was instant messaging over a secure network.”—Ned Desmond/“Broadband’s New Killer App”/Business

2.0/ OCT2002

Page 10: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Eric Shinseki’s Army

Flat.Fast.Agile.Adaptable.Light … But Lethal.“I Am An ARMY of One.”Info-intense.Network-centric.

Page 11: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

From: Weapon v. Weapon

To: Org structure v. Org structure

Page 12: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

II. All Bets Are Off.

Page 13: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“There will be more

confusion in the business world in the next decade than in any decade in history. And the current pace of

change will only accelerate.”Steve Case

Page 14: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Most of our predictions are based

on very linear thinking. That’s why they will

most likely be wrong.”Vinod Khosla, in “GIGATRENDS,” Wired 04.01

Page 15: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“The corporation as we know it, which is now 120 years old, is

not likely to survive the next 25 years. Legally and

financially, yes, but not structurally and economically.”

Peter Drucker, Business 2.0 (08.00)

Page 16: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“In 25 years, you’ll probably be able to get the

sum total of all human knowledge on a personal

device.”Greg Blonder, VC [was Chief Technical

Adviser for Corporate Strategy @ AT&T] [Barron’s 11.13.2000]

Page 17: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

2.5G, 3G, 4GWindowsSymbian

JavaBluetooth

Wi-FiPCs-PDAs-Cell“phones”

E-business vs. M-businessEtc.

Page 18: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Unless mankind redesigns itself by changing our DNA through altering our genetic

makeup, computer-generated robots will take

over the world.” – Stephen

Hawking, in the German magazine Focus

Page 19: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Outsider’s view: (1) Billions are being spent, even in a down

market. (2) NOBODY HAS A CLUE AS TO WHO THE

WINNERS—AND LOSERS—WILL BE. (3) Yet you must play.

Now. Hard. Fast.

Page 20: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

III. The Destruction Imperative.

Page 21: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Forbes100 from 1917 to 1987: 39 members of the Class of ’17 were alive

in ’87; 18 in ’87 F100; 18 F100 “survivors” underperformed the market

by 20%; just 2 (2%), GE & Kodak, outperformed the market 1917 to 1987.

S&P 500 from 1957 to 1997: 74 members of the Class of ’57 were

alive in ’97; 12 (2.4%) of 500 outperformed the market from 1957 to 1997.

Source: Dick Foster & Sarah Kaplan, Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market

Page 22: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Good management was the most powerful reason [leading firms] failed to stay atop their industries. Precisely because these firms

listened to their customers, invested aggressively in technologies that would provide their customers more

and better products of the sort they wanted, and because they carefully studied market trends and

systematically allocated investment capital to innovations that promised the best returns, they lost

their positions of leadership.”

Clayton Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma

Page 23: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Forget>“Learn”

“The problem is never how to get new, innovative

thoughts into your mind,

but how to get the old ones out.”

Dee Hock

Page 24: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Active mutators in placid times tend to die off. They

are selected against. Reluctant mutators in

quickly changing times are also selected against.”

Carl Sagan & Ann Druyan, Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors

Page 25: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

C.E.O. to

C.D.O.

Page 26: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“It is generally much easier to kill an

organization than change it

substantially.” Kevin Kelly, Out of Control

Page 27: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

The [New] Ge Way

DYB.com

Page 28: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Strategy meetings held once

or twice a year” to “Strategy meetings needed several

times a week”

Source: New York Times on Meg Whitman/eBay

Page 29: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“If you don’t like change, you’re going to like

irrelevance even less.” —General Eric Shinseki, Chief

of Staff, U. S. Army

Page 30: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

No Wiggle Room!

“Incrementalism is innovation’s worst enemy.”

Nicholas Negroponte

Page 31: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“The difficulties … arise from the inherent conflict between the need to control existing operations and the need to create the kind of environment that will permit new ideas to flourish—and old ones to die a

timely death. … We believe that most corporations will find it impossible to

match or outperform the market without abandoning the assumption of continuity. … The current apocalypse—the transition from a state of continuity to state of discontinuity—Has the same suddenness [as the trauma that beset civilization in

1000 A.D.]”

Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan, “Creative Destruction” (The McKinsey Quarterly)

Page 32: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Just Say No …

“I don’t intend to be known as the ‘King of

the Tinkerers.’ ”CEO, large financial services company

(New York, 5-99)

Page 33: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

IV. IS/ IT/ Web … “On the Bus” or “Off the

Bus.”

Page 34: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

100 square feet

Page 35: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

The Real “News”: X1,000,000

TowTruckNet.com

Page 36: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Impact No. 1/ Logistics &

Distribution: Wal*Mart … Dell … Amazon.com …

Autobytel.com … FedEx … UPS … Ryder … Cisco … Etc. … Etc.

… Ad Infinitum.

Page 37: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Autobytel: $400.

Wal*Mart: 13%.Source: BW(05.13.2002)

Page 38: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

WebWorld = Everything

Web as a way to run your business’s innardsWeb as connector for your entire supply-demand chain Web as “spider’s web” which re-conceives the industry

Web/B2B as ultimate wake-up call to “commodity producers”

Web as the scourge of slack, inefficiency, sloth, bureaucracy, poor customer data

Web as an Encompassing Way of LifeWeb = Everything (P.D. to after-sales)

Web forces you to focus on what you do bestWeb as entrée, at any size, to World’s Best at Everything

as next door neighbor

Page 39: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Ebusiness is about rebuilding the organization from the

ground up. Most companies today are not built to exploit the Internet.

Their business processes, their approvals, their hierarchies, the

number of people they employ … all of that is wrong for running an

ebusiness.”

Ray Lane, Kleiner Perkins

Page 40: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“There’s no use trying,” said Alice. “One can’t believe impossible things.”

“I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was

your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve

believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”

Lewis Carroll

Page 41: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Don’t rebuild. Reimagine.”

The New York Times Magazine on the future of the WTC space in Lower Manhattan/09.08.2002

Page 42: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Suppose—just suppose—that the Web is a new world we’re just beginning to inhabit. We’re like the earlier European settlers in the United States, living on the

edge of the forest. We don’t know what’s there and we don’t know exactly what we need to do to find out: Do we pack mountain climbing gear, desert wear, canoes, or all three? Of course while the settlers may not have

known what the geography of the New World was going to be, they at least knew that there was a geography. The Web, on the other hand, has no

geography, no landscape. It has no distance. It has nothing natural in it. It has few rules of behavior and fewer lines of authority. Common sense doesn’t hold

here, and uncommon sense hasn’t yet emerged.” David Weinberger, Small Pieces Loosely Joined

Page 43: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Case: CRM

Page 44: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Anne Busquet/ American Express

Not: “Age of the Internet”

Is: “Age of Customer Control”

Page 45: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Amen!

“The Age of the

Never Satisfied Customer”

Regis McKenna

Page 46: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“The Web enables total transparency. People with

access to relevant information are beginning to challenge any type of

authority. The stupid, loyal and humble customer, employee, patient

or citizen is dead.”

Kjell Nordström and Jonas Ridderstråle, Funky Business

Page 47: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Parents, doctors, stockbrokers, even military leaders are starting to

lose the authority they once had. There are all these roles premised on access to privileged information. …

What we are witnessing is a collapse of that advantage,

prestige and authority.”Michael Lewis, next

Page 48: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“CRM has, almost universally, failed

to live up to expectations.”

Butler Group (UK)

Page 49: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

CGE&Y (Paul Cole): “Pleasant

Transaction” vs. “Systemic Opportunity.” “Better job

of what we do today” vs. “Re-think overall

enterprise strategy.”

Page 50: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

V. Charge … Up the Value-added Ladder:

Sell “Solutions”/ “Success”/ “Experiences”/

“Dream Fulfillment”/Design = Soul/Brand = ALL!

Page 51: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“The ‘surplus society’ has a surplus of

similar companies, employing

similar people, with similar educational backgrounds, coming up

with similar ideas, producing

similar things, with similar prices

and similar quality.”

Kjell Nordström and Jonas Ridderstråle, Funky Business

Page 52: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

The Value-added

3-Step

Page 53: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Step 1. “Satisfaction” to

“Solutions” & “Success”

Page 54: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Gerstner’s IBM: Systems Integrator of

choice. Global Services:

$35B. Pledge/’99: Business Partner Charter. 72 strategic partners,

aim for 200. Drop many in-house

programs/products. (BW/12.01).

Page 55: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“UPS wants to take over the sweet spot in the endless loop

of goods, information and capital that all the packages

[it moves] represent.”ecompany.com/06.01 (E.g., UPS Logistics

manages the logistics of 4.5M Ford vehicles, from 21 mfg. sites to 6,000 NA dealers)

Page 56: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Step 2. Solutions+ =

Awesome Experiences

Page 57: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Experiences are as distinct from services as services are from

goods.”Joseph Pine & James Gilmore, The Experience Economy:

Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage

Page 58: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Club Med is more than just a ‘resort’; it’s a means of rediscovering oneself, of inventing an

entirely new ‘me.’ ”

Source: Jean-Marie Dru, Disruption

Page 59: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Experience: “Rebel Lifestyle!”

“What we sell is the ability for a 43-year-old accountant to dress in black leather, ride

through small towns and have people be afraid of him.”

Harley exec, quoted in Results-Based Leadership

Page 60: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Bob Lutz: “I see us as being in the art business. Art,

entertainment and mobile sculpture, which,

coincidentally, also happens to provide transportation.”

Source: NYT 10.19.01

Page 61: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Lexus sells its cars as containers for our

sound systems. It’s marvelous.”—Sidney Harman/

Harman International

Page 62: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU?

Page 63: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Step 3.The Bedrock:

Design = “Soul”

Page 64: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

All Equal Except …

“At Sony we assume that all products of our competitors have basically the same

technology, price, performance and

features. Design is the only thing that differentiates one product from another in the

marketplace.”Norio Ohga

Page 65: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

VI. SHE … Is the Customer!

Page 66: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

91% women: ADVERTISERS DON’T

UNDERSTAND US. (58% “ANNOYED.”)

Source: Greenfield Online for Arnold’s Women’s Insight Team (Martha Barletta, Marketing to Women)

Page 67: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Read This Book …

EVEolution: The Eight Truths of Marketing to Women

Faith Popcorn & Lys Marigold

Page 68: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

EVEolution: Truth No. 1

Connecting Your Female Consumers to Each

Other Connects Them to Your Brand

Page 69: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Women don’t buy

brands. They join them.”

EVEolution

Page 70: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

VII. Leading in … Totally Screwed

Up Times

Page 71: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

The Kotler Doctrine:

1965-1980: R.A.F.(Ready.Aim.Fire.)

1980-1995: R.F.A.(Ready.Fire!Aim.)

1995-????: F.F.F.(Fire!Fire!Fire!)

Page 72: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“If it works, it’s

obsolete.”

—Marshall McLuhan

Page 73: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“I’m not comfortable unless

I’m uncomfortable.”—Jay Chiat

Page 74: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“If things seem under control, you’re just not

going fast enough.”

Mario Andretti

Page 75: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

“Reward excellent failures. Punish

mediocre successes.”

Phil Daniels, Sydney exec

Page 76: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

The greatest dangerfor most of us

is not that our aim istoo high

and we miss it,but that it is

too lowand we reach it.

Michelangelo

Page 77: Tom Peters’ We Are in a Brawl with No Rules Phoenix 24/November/2002

Thank You!