top 15 climate myths-i love co2

8/9/2019 Top 15 Climate Myths-I Love CO2

1/13

Top 15 Climate Myths

http://www.iloveco2.org/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.html

15 COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUTANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMINGAND

CLIMATE CHANGE

MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented

rate.

FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last threedecades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in globaltemperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over thelast 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium.However, the ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; thestations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), whichshow substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects") i.e. local heatretention due to urban sprawl, not global warmingand it is these, 'false high' ground readingswhich are then programmed into the disreputable climate models used by your favourite envirogroups such as Greenpeace, which live up to the GIGO acronymGarbage In, Garbage Out.

Looking at it from the long term, the planet has been gradually recovering from the Little IceAge which ended in 1850. Our temps are in fact right where they should be. From a short termperspective, satellite measurements (which are far more accurate than land-based stations) arenow showing a gradual decrease in global temperatures, and it is currently well accepted thattemperatures have been slowly falling for over a decade now and cold records are being set farmore often than warm records.

In summary, there has been no catastrophic warming recorded from either method whatsoever.

MYTH 2: It's never been warmer in the past.

FACT: We are in a relatively cool period and it used to be much warmer over countless periodsin the past. Even just a few hundred years ago, the Vikings used to live in parts of Greenlandwithout snow, and vineyards flourished in the North of London! There is nothing apocalyptic

about warmer temperatures, in fact it's quite the opposite. In the UK, every mild winter saves20,000 cold-related deaths, and scaled up over northern Europe mild winters save hundreds ofthousands of lives each year. ALSO, data from ice core samples shows that in the past,temperatures have risen by ten times the current rise, and fallen again, in the space of a humanlifetime. Nothing is happening "faster than normal" with today's weather/climatechange/temperature variations, etc.
http://www.iloveco2.org/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.htmlhttp://www.iloveco2.org/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/868-lowest-max-temps-and-651-low-temps.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/868-lowest-max-temps-and-651-low-temps.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/868-lowest-max-temps-and-651-low-temps.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/868-lowest-max-temps-and-651-low-temps.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/868-lowest-max-temps-and-651-low-temps.htmlhttp://www.iloveco2.org/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.htmlhttp://www.iloveco2.org/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.html


2/13

MYTH 3: The "hockey sti

experienced a steady, ver

years, then recently began

FACT: The hockey stick graph seecompletely debunked and proven frclimate which have continually occWarm Period, from around 1000 tofollowed by a period known as theglobal temperature" has been rising1970 temperatures actually dropptemperatures are dropping once aga

The "hockey stick", a former poster

Department, ignores historical recostatistically unreliable as well. It hathoroughly discredited throughout tscientific hoaxes of our time, yet yothe Sierra Club, Greenpeace, etc. TBut what else would you expect, sechange lie.

Speaking of computer generated scand the fraudulent claim that the bebear populations are 500% larger th

playing on people's emotions to dri

MYTH 4: Human produc

100 years, adding to the G

FACT: Carbon dioxide levels havejust as they have throughout geolog

ck" graph proves that the earth ha

gradual temperature decrease for

a sudden increase.

inAn Inconvenient Truth and elsewhere has beeaudulent. It has airbrushed out the significant charred throughout geologic time. For instance, the200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenlanittle Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century tat the low steady rate mentioned above; althougd, leading to a Global Cooling scare. And now t

in, in fact they've been dropping since 1998.

boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Enviro

ded climatic swings, and is proven to be flawednow been quietly removed from the IPCC repoe scientific world and is well regarded as one of

u can still find it being used today by organizatioe chart is a computer construct and a very faultying as it was created only to help perpetrate the

ms, let's not forget the drowning polar bears inrs are disappearing. In fact they are actually thri

an they were 50 years ago. Shame on you, Al Go

e support for your enormous $45 trillion carbon

d carbon dioxide has increased ove

reenhouse effect, thus warming the

indeed changed for various reasons, human andic time. Since the beginning of the industrial rev

000

nnges inMedieval) was

he "averagefrom 1940e

nment

ndts andthe biggestns such asone at that.limate

ore's movieing. Polar

re, for

tax hoax.

r the last

earth.

therwise,lution, the
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.htmlhttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html


3/13

CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has alsoincreased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth ratehas now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is a measurabledriver of global warming, let alone the tiny amount released by humankind. As measured in icecores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the

temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming.

Effectively, the man-made global warming theorists have put effect before cause thiscompletely debunks the entire global warming theory and shows that reducing carbon dioxideemissions is a futile King Canute exercise! Geological field work in recent sediments confirmsthis causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and downnaturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warmingsurface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.

MYTH 5: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.

FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varyingamounts, about 96.5% is water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being trace gases likeCO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O. CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. And then thehuman portion of that 0.037% is incredibly small.

But isn't CO2 the most important of the greenhouse gases? Nope. Not even close. Most of thegreenhouse effect is due to water vapor, which is about 100 times as abundant in the atmosphereas CO2 and thus has a much larger effect.

In summary, water vapour is by far the most important and overwhelming greenhouse gas.Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention these important facts.

What's next? A steam tax when you boil a kettle for your cup of tea?

MYTH 6: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause

significant global warming.

FACT: The computer models assume that CO2 is the primary climate driver, when in fact CO2does not drive climate, and they do not take into account the Sun, which has the most significanteffect on climate. You cannot use the output of a model to verify or prove its initial assumption -that is circular reasoning and is illogical. Computer models can be made to roughly match the20th century temperature rise by adjusting many input parameters and using strong positivefeedbacks. They do not "prove" anything. Also, computer models predicting global warming areincapable of properly including the effects of the sun, cosmic rays and the clouds. The sun is amajor cause of temperature variation on the earth surface as its received radiation changes all thetime, This happens largely in cyclical fashion. The number and the lengths in time of sunspotscan be correlated very closely with average temperatures on earth, e.g. the Little Ice Age and theMedieval Warm Period. Varying intensity of solar heat radiation affects the surface temperatureof the oceans and the currents. Warmer ocean water expels gases, some of which are CO2. Solarradiation interferes with the cosmic ray flux, thus influencing the amount ionized nuclei which
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.html


4/13

control cloud cover. Again, models are in essence: GARBAGE IN = GARBAGE OUT. (Maybethey should also take note that when the Earth warms, so do other planets in our solar system.Now please explain how CO2 can cause that?!)

MYTH 7: The UN proved that manmade CO2 causes global

warming.

FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from thefinal draft. Here they are:1) None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed

climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.2) No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to manmadecauses

Scientists draft reports for the IPCC, but the IPCC are bureaucrats appointed by governments, infact many scientists who contribute to the reports disagree with the spin that the IPCC andmedia put on their findings. The latest report suggests that the next 100 years might see atemperature change of 6 Celsius yet a Lead Author for the IPCC (Dr John Christy UAH/NASA)has pointed out that the scenarios with the fastest warming rates were added to the report at a latestage, at the request of a few governments (to create urgency)in other words the scientistswere told what to do by politicians and many of them strongly disagree. This is not science. It'spolitical propaganda.

To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 has any effect on globalwarming or can cause "climate change". However, there is plenty of scientific proof that the

Earth has been cooling while CO2 has risen, and that increased CO2 is very beneficial to ourplanet.

MYTH 8: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a pollutant.

FACT: This is absolutely not true. Nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere. We could not live in100% nitrogen either. Carbon dioxide is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is. CO2 is essential tolife on earth. It is necessary for plant growth since increased CO2 intake as a result of increased
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.html


5/13

atmospheric concentration causes many trees and other plants to grow more vigorously.Unfortunately, the Canadian Government has included CO2 with a number of truly toxic andnoxious substances listed by the Environmental Protection Act, only as their means to politicallycontrol it. In the US, president Obama is also trying to classify CO2 as a "pollutant" for the samepolitical reasons. It's really quite terrifying and is a slap in the face to science.

MYTH 9: Reducing car use will cut carbon dioxide levels and save the

planet!

FACT: The planet does not need saving from this mythical problem of CO2 emissions from cars,but taking this on anyway, removing every car from every road in every country overnight wouldNOT produce any change in the carbon dioxide level of the atmosphere, and in any case it ispointless trying to alter climate by changing carbon dioxide levels as the cause and effect is theother way round!It is changes in the activity of the Sun that cause temperature changes onearth, with any temperature rise causing carbon dioxide to de-gas from the oceans.

MYTH 10: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather

extremes.

FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on aglobal scale. Regional variations may occur, and always do. Growing insurance andinfrastructure repair costs, particularly in coastal areas, are sometimes claimed to be the result ofincreasing frequency and severity of storms, whereas in reality they are a function of increasingpopulation density, escalating development value, and ever more media reporting. Weatherrecords clearly show there has been a decrease in violent and extreme weather over the pastcentury.

Extreme weather correlates with the cycle of solar activity, not carbon dioxide emissions orpolitical elections. The recent heavy rainfall in winter and spring is a perfect example of thisit occurred at solar maximum at a time when solar maxima are very intensethis pattern maywell repeat every 11 years until about 2045. Furthermore, the hottest and coldest days on recordoccurred more than 60 years ago (before industry) and the wackiest most extreme weatherrecorded over the last 100 years, including the strongest hurricanes, and devastatingdroughts/floods, all occurred in the 1940's. And guess what? They will always happen, everyyear, with new records set daily. Normal.

Contrary to media hysteria claiming increasing storm severities, scientists have studied this issue

and come to the opposite conclusion: extreme events are becoming LESS common. Atlantichurricanes were much more numerous from 1950 to 1975 than from 1975 to present. Hailstormsin the US are 35% less common than they were fifty years ago. Extreme rainfall in the US at theend of the 20th century is comparable to what it was at the beginning of the 20th century. Also,there is much empirical evidence to suggest that when global warming does happen from time totime, more warmth generally leads to a morestable climate with less weather extremes. Onceagain, the greenies got it backwards.
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/06/17/nothing-wacky-about-the-weather.aspxhttp://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/06/17/nothing-wacky-about-the-weather.aspx


6/13

MYTH 11: Carbon taxes, petrol duty, and workplace parking charges

are justifiable environmental taxes.

FACT: As carbon dioxide emissions from cars and factories does not have any impact onclimate, these taxes are 'just another tax' on enterprise and mobility, and have no real green

credentials. None.

MYTH 12: Global warming must be real since governments are trying

to cover it up and I see protests all the time!

FACT: It's exactly the opposite. Governments everywhere are not only active supporters of theclimate change lie, they are promoters of it and massively fund it. And they've done anabsolutely brilliant job of it by easily convincing the world's alarmists and Earth-conscientiouscitizens of an impending catastrophe, thereby utilizing the protesters and subsequent immensepolitical pressure to push through the very policies they aspire to implement on all of us.

Governments have learned the power of activism ever since the days of the revolution, andthey've managed to use it to their advantage. Extremist environmentalists have been duped intobecoming a tool for the very governments they believe they're "fighting" against. A recentexample of this was the declaration by Al Gore and James Hansen which encouraged activists toconsider civil disobedience to stop the construction of new coal power plants.

In defense of many environmentalists and "cause-jumpers", quite often they simply do not knowany better but are actually well intentioned.

MYTH 13: Receding glaciers, the calving of ice shelves, and the

shrinking of snow on Mt. Kilimanjaro are proof of global warming.

FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glaciermelting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelveshave been breaking off for centuries. Scientists know of at least 33 periods of glaciers growingand then retreating. Its normal. Besides, glacier's health is dependent as much on precipitation ason temperature. What you see on your television newscasts are images of the annual summermelt off, which happens every single year and is nothing to worry about.

Global warming is not melting Mt. Kilimanjaro's alpine glacier. Temperatures at Mt. Kilimanjarohave been slightly cooling since at least the middle of the twentieth century, and thosetemperatures virtually never rise above freezing. Scientists have long known that deforestation at

the base of the mountain is causing the mountaintop glacier to shrink, by reducing the moistureand resultant precipitation in mountain updrafts.

MYTH 14: The earths poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking

up and melting and the sea level rising.
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/climate-funding-exposed-79-billion.htmlhttp://www.climatechangefraud.com/content/view/3365/218/http://ilovemycarbondioxide.com/pdf/Ten_Global_Warming_Truths.pdfhttp://ilovemycarbondioxide.com/pdf/Ten_Global_Warming_Truths.pdfhttp://www.climatechangefraud.com/content/view/3365/218/http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/07/climate-funding-exposed-79-billion.html


7/13

FACT: The earth is variable. The wdue to unrelated cyclic events in thegetting colder. And now the westerAntarctica is getting warmer, whilethicknesses are increasingboth on

Sea level monitoring in the Pacificany sea level rise.

MYTH 15: There are onl

dispute that man-made gl

FACT: There are literally tens of thpetitions, ranging from the OregonLeipzig Declaration which all statetheory nor is there any impact from

dissenting against Al Gore and the I waste of time, expensive, dangerouthe public as H L Mencken saidpopulace alarmed, and hence clamoof hobgoblins, all of them imaginar

rule it. Of the scientists who suppor

government agencies and others aremade climate change is a hoax.

THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

estern Arctic may be gotten somewhat warmer laPacific Ocean, but the Eastern Arctic and GreenArctic is cooling again. The small Palmer Peni

the main Antarctic continent is actually cooling.reenland and in Antarctica.

Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has show

a tiny handful of maverick scientis

bal warming theory is true.

ousands of signatures from scientists worldwideetition Project, the Manhattan Declaration, all that there is no evidence for the man-made globamankinds activities on climate. Many scientists

PCC and strongly believe that the Kyoto agreemand one of the biggest political scams ever perp

"The fundamental aim of practical politics is to krous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an e" the desire to save the world usually fronts a

the climate change theory, many are on payroll

simply securing their funding. The consensus is

st century,land aresula of

Ice

n no sign of

s who

n manye way to the

l warmingare now

ent is a totaletrated oneep thedless seriesdesire to

of

clear: Man-
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://www.petitionproject.org/http://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/hundreds-of-scientists-publicly.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://www.petitionproject.org/http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/02/manhattan-declaration-on-climate-change.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/hundreds-of-scientists-publicly.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/hundreds-of-scientists-publicly.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/hundreds-of-scientists-publicly.htmlhttp://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/02/manhattan-declaration-on-climate-change.htmlhttp://www.petitionproject.org/http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/ice-caps-and-glaciers-growing-around.html


8/13


9/13

Without CO2, vegetation di CO2 levels used to be much Higher temperatures from th Rising CO2 is an effectof gl Global warming and coolin

The higher the CO2 levels i Forests and plant life growt

to CO2. Increasing CO2 yields large The Earth is not currently w Temperatures in the past ha Even if it were to happen, a Many scientists believe we When the planet warms and Polar ice is now at record le Climate changes happen all

modern times. There has been no increase i

So don't panic. You're NOT at faultIt is a blatant lie put forth in thescientists who dont buy into anth

Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurri

Former President Clinton, Al Gore,scientists that global warming willa Sound Economy, we know now tabout climate. Among the signers:administrator, a gynecologist, sevenChinese medicine. We also now kn

asked whether they agree with thehave thus asked to have their namesAll Pain, No Gain --- Malcom Wall

"When a bureaucracy's reason fo

missions."Desperately Seeking Mi

VanDoren

s, herbivores die, you die.higher many times in the past.e sun result in CO2 levels rising long afterwardsobal warming, not a cause.is a purely natural phenomenon.

the atmosphere, the greener our planet becomeshas increased by approx 40% over the last 50 y

food crops. This is beneficial to a growing poparming, it is in fact cooling.e often been much warmer than today.

warmer Earth is far better than a colder one, forre on the cuss ofthe next little ice age.cools it is due to the sun. Not your car.els and still growing.

the time, and have occurred much faster than an

n extreme weather. In fact, records show the exa

! media that makes it seem there is only a fring

ropogenic global warming. - U.S. Atmospheri

ane Research Division of NOAA.

Obama and others have often cited a letter signeave catastrophic effects on humanity. Thanks toat fewer than 10 percent of these "scientists" knplastic surgeon, two landscape architects, a hotesociologists, a linguist, and a practitioner of tradw that many of the few actual scientists on that

N's asessments, and many of them vehementlyremoved from that fraudulent list. Global Warm

op

r existence is threatened, it typically generatesion: Why the State Department's Gone Green -

.

.ars, thanks

lation.

ll life.

thing in

ct opposite.

e of Scientist

by 2600Citizens forw anythinglitionalanel are not

isagree and ing Treaty is

new- Peter
http://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922-earth_ice_age-0http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922-earth_ice_age-0http://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/dailys/8-08-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://www.townhall.com/ff/op-ed.mw11-97.htmlhttp://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922-earth_ice_age-0


10/13

movieAn Inconvenient Truth and wmass hysteria based not on sciencejunk science used by extremists is e

You will learn that there is no empiincreases. It is, in fact, an after effepollutant, pollution has nothing to dnotions are a fraud, there is no "conthe past than it is today, polar bearshurricanes are not caused or madedecreasing, and there is extensive eit really happens from time to time,variations.

Those who claim that skeptics are iquestionable sources need to give tPROMOTE the climate change mytchange:

Debunkers of the global warming t

Supporters of the global warmin

Many people want a piece of that $these groups can continue to convinto emit that evil CO2! Don't you fingroups of being in bed with the largcash on the line in these companiesfull well that in order to receive funMoney then flows in like a river, re

It is better to trust scientists than

With the release of Al Gore's prop ith the help of the media the public has been driv

ut lies. The movie has been completely debunke xactly that:junk.

ical evidence that man-made CO2 is a cause of tt of temperature increases. Carbon Dioxide (COo with global warming, politicians who support ssensus" on global warming, the Earth has been faare not endangered or dying, they are thriving, dorse by global warming, extreme weather eventidence of the factual natural causes of global wa

pointing squarely at increased solar activity and

n bed with the oil companies or receive fundingeir heads a shake and look at the facts. Fundingh are astronomical, while money for the skeptics

eory have received approx = $21M (Million).

theory have received approx = $79B (BILLI

9 billion pie, and the figure will only get higherce the populous that the end is nearunless we alld it odd that nearly nobody ever accuses the giane Green Industry? Or that Al Gore has boatloads

Every environmental, political, and research grding and grants they need to create urgency andardless of actual science. It's a sad fact.

politicans. Do not let fear ruin your day. Lear

aganda en into a

d and the

emperature) is not a

uch absurdr warmer inoughts andare

rming whenrbital

fromnd grants tois pocket

N!)

so long asstart paying

t Enviroof his ownup knowsanic.

n the Facts.
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.htmlhttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.htmlhttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html


11/13

There are several motives for the media and politicians to lie to you about global warming,

aside from money and control.

~The media sells more papers, magazines, and television ratings soar when their audience isscared of some imminent catastrophe that your respective service is reporting on. Although, they

can't decide whether we're going to burn to death, freeze to death, or drown.http://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263759

~Environmental organizations and some scientists will lie to you because their funding dependson it. If theres no crisis to work through, then they start losing funding. This is well documented.http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/von_Storch/staged_angst/a_climate_of_staged_angst.htm l

~Foreign countries are lying to us (by means of the IPCC) because they wish to throw a monkeywrench into the inner workings of western economies, which are the strongest in the world. Ifour economy slows down, the economic standing of other countries improves because we will nolonger dominate the markets.

~Development and industrialization of third world countries will be stamped out, along withhundreds of millions of lives, all under the guise of "saving the planet from climate change". It'sabsolutely sickening. So, who's really on the "immoral" side? Us or the alarmists?

~Wanna talk about new taxes and restricted freedoms? Try carbon taxes on everything and strictregulations for everyone....all coming soon by convincing you that CO2 & greenhouse gases aresomehow evil and you must pay to emit them. Too bad they can't tax the oceans since they arethe cause of 96.5% of all greenhouse emissions, naturally, eh! Also too bad they can't go back intime and tax the dinosaurs since CO2 levels were MUCH higher back then and it must have beentheir fault.

The motives for deception are there. Do your part to fight alarmism!

- CO2 is NOT a pollutant!- Educate yourself!CLICK HERE and HERE.

Antarctica is getting colder and thicker:http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/12/05/sea-level-rise-not-from-antarctic-melting/ ), and we know that any fluctuating warming/cooling is due to natural occurrences, andnot human activity.

MUST READ LINKS:

http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/06/17/nothing-wacky-about-the-weather.aspxhttp://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/06/17/nothing-wacky-about-the-weather.aspxhttp://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263759http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/von_Storch/staged_angst/a_climate_of_staged_angst.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-is-life.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-is-life.htmlhttp://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/12/05/sea-level-rise-not-from-antarctic-melting/http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/12/05/sea-level-rise-not-from-antarctic-melting/http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/12/05/sea-level-rise-not-from-antarctic-melting/http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/12/05/sea-level-rise-not-from-antarctic-melting/http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-is-life.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-climate-facts.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/co2-is-life.htmlhttp://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/von_Storch/staged_angst/a_climate_of_staged_angst.htmlhttp://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263759http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/06/17/nothing-wacky-about-the-weather.aspx


12/13

http://globalwarminghoax.wordpress.com/2008/03 /http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20061121_gore.pdfhttp://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/http://www.junkscience.com/challenge.htmhttp://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFiZDAyMWFhMGIxNTgwNGIyMjVkZjQ4OGFiZjF l

Njchttp://www.cei.org/pdf/5331.pdfhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/06/nclim06.xml&sSheet=/ne ws/2003/04/06/ixhome.htmlhttp://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htmhttp://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060810-020342-6063 rhttp://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum/climatechange2/07_1.shtm lhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_theory_%28science%29http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice_execsum.asphttp://epw.senate.gov/searchresults.cfm?search=Global+Warminghttp://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777

The reason for warming:http://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_sunclimate.htm lhttp://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/images/sunclimate_3b.gifhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/03/030321075236.htmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/358953.st mhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sSheet=/ne ws/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.htmlhttp://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/09/sunwarm.htm lhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml& s

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variatio n

If you're still not convinced that scientists are capable of being slanted in theirresearch, check out this article:http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263847

For those who believe environmentalists are innocent:http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/131http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/29/91422.shtm lhttp://epw.senate.gov/repwhitepapers/Political.pdf

For those who believe there is a consensus:http://www.petitionproject.org/http://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.htm l

To see what happened in a debate between alarmists and skeptics:http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=5ac 1c0d6-802a-23ad-4a8c-ee5a888dfe7e
http://globalwarminghoax.wordpress.com/2008/03/http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20061121_gore.pdfhttp://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/http://www.junkscience.com/challenge.htmhttp://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFiZDAyMWFhMGIxNTgwNGIyMjVkZjQ4OGFiZjFlNjchttp://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFiZDAyMWFhMGIxNTgwNGIyMjVkZjQ4OGFiZjFlNjchttp://www.cei.org/pdf/5331.pdfhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/06/nclim06.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/06/ixhome.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/06/nclim06.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/06/ixhome.htmlhttp://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htmhttp://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060810-020342-6063rhttp://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum/climatechange2/07_1.shtmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_theory_%28science%29http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice_execsum.asphttp://epw.senate.gov/searchresults.cfm?search=Global+Warminghttp://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777http://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_sunclimate.htmlhttp://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/images/sunclimate_3b.gifhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/03/030321075236.htmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/358953.stmhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.htmlhttp://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/09/sunwarm.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml&shttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variationhttp://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263847http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/131http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/29/91422.shtmlhttp://epw.senate.gov/repwhitepapers/Political.pdfhttp://www.petitionproject.org/http://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.htmlhttp://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=5ac1c0d6-802a-23ad-4a8c-ee5a888dfe7ehttp://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=5ac1c0d6-802a-23ad-4a8c-ee5a888dfe7ehttp://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=5ac1c0d6-802a-23ad-4a8c-ee5a888dfe7ehttp://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=5ac1c0d6-802a-23ad-4a8c-ee5a888dfe7ehttp://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.htmlhttp://www.petitionproject.org/http://epw.senate.gov/repwhitepapers/Political.pdfhttp://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/29/91422.shtmlhttp://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/131http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263847http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variationhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml&shttp://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/09/sunwarm.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/18/wsun18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/358953.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stmhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/03/030321075236.htmhttp://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/images/sunclimate_3b.gifhttp://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_sunclimate.htmlhttp://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777http://epw.senate.gov/searchresults.cfm?search=Global+Warminghttp://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice_execsum.asphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_theory_%28science%29http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum/climatechange2/07_1.shtmlhttp://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060810-020342-6063rhttp://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htmhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/06/nclim06.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/06/ixhome.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/06/nclim06.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/06/ixhome.htmlhttp://www.cei.org/pdf/5331.pdfhttp://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFiZDAyMWFhMGIxNTgwNGIyMjVkZjQ4OGFiZjFlNjchttp://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFiZDAyMWFhMGIxNTgwNGIyMjVkZjQ4OGFiZjFlNjchttp://www.junkscience.com/challenge.htmhttp://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20061121_gore.pdfhttp://globalwarminghoax.wordpress.com/2008/03/


13/13

More FACTS and MYTHS? See what Professor deFreitas has to say. Click here.

RESOURCES

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!
http://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/deFreitas.pdfhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/resources.htmlhttp://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/resources.htmlhttp://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/deFreitas.pdf

top 15 climate myths-i love co2

Documents