“top-down” vs. “bottom-up control”: evolution of alternative scenarios for community...
TRANSCRIPT
“Top-down” vs. “bottom-up control”:
evolution of alternative scenarios for
community dynamics in a semiarid
system
Peter L. Meserve, Douglas A. Kelt, M. Andrea
Previtali, W. Bryan Milstead, and Julio R.
Gutiérrez
Study Site: Fray Jorge National ParkFray Jorge National Park
Quebrada de las Vacas
(71º 41' W, 30º 39' S)
north-central Chile
Semiarid thorn scrub community
• Arid-mediterranean climate
• Evergreen/drought-deciduous shrubs
• Herbaceous understory after winter rains
• Semiarid-mediterranean climate
• Evergreen/drought-deciduous shrubs
• Herbaceous understory after winter rains
Principal “players” include a diverse group of small mammals
Thylamys elegansThylamys elegans AbrocomaAbrocoma bennettibennetti
Octodon degusOctodon degus
Abrothrix longipilisAbrothrix longipilis
Phyllotis darwiniPhyllotis darwini Abrothrix olivaceusAbrothrix olivaceus
Oligoryzomys Oligoryzomys longicaudatuslongicaudatus
And their vertebrate predators…
Lycalopex culpaeusLycalopex culpaeusAtheneAthene
cuniculariacunicularia Tyto albaTyto albaBubo Bubo
magellanicusmagellanicus
Geranoaetus Geranoaetus melanoleucusmelanoleucus Philodryas Philodryas
chamissonischamissonisCallopistes Callopistes
pallumapalluma
Genesis of a large-scale manipulative field experiment…
Our original questions:
What biotic factors are mostimportant in structuring small
mammals and plants here?
Biotic interactions:• Predation• Competition• Herbivory
Our premise was that the system was primarily
“top-down”- controlled
Selective exclusion of predators and/or degus
+P+D
+P+D
+P+D
+P+D+P -
D
+P -D
+P -D
+P -D
-P -D
-P -D
-P -D
-P -D
-P+D
-P+D-P+D
-P+D
Predator exclusion grids with high fencing & netting overhead
Controls with low fencing
• Presence or absence of ca. 5 cm d holes permitting selective entry or exclusion of degus
Small mammals:
• Monthly mark-recapture; density estimates from minimum number known alive (MNKA)
Vegetation:
• Point intercept method for shrub & herbaceous plants (ephemerals)
• Soil samples for seed separation
Sampling procedures
Predators:
• Olfactory lines & scat collection (foxes)
• Sightings & pellet collections (raptors)
Responses of small mammals to exclusion of predators and/or degus
• Transitory effects of predation on degu numbers & survival
• Little or no effects of degu exclusion on other species
Responses to high rainfall events
• Dramatic increases during/after high rainfall years with time lags for degus
• Declines during ensuing dry periods
Rainfall-driven changes
A dry year A wet year
In wet years, rainfall may increase 2-3 times the normal 110-120 mm
Changes in vegetation relative to rainfall
Strong fluctuations in herbaceous (ephemeral) cover & seed density
Relatively constant perennial shrub cover
Time (years)19891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008
Pe
rce
nt C
ove
r
0
20
40
60
80
100
De
nsi
ty s
ee
ds /
m2
x 1
03
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50Rainfall (mm)Perennial Seeds Ephemeral
233 229 77 35 54 77 330 11 58 2363289 356209 84 168 90 147 48 96
What happens in nearby
habitats such as fog forest and more mesic aguadas?
Thorn scrubFog forestAguadas
But we also failed to consider spatial
dynamics…
Fog forest
Aguadas
Many small mammal species persist in nearby habitats during drought periods
Min
imum
Num
ber
Kn
own
Aliv
e /
Grid
O. degus
P. darwini
A. olivaceus
O. longicaudatus
T. elegans
A. longipilis
10
100
10
100
10
100
10
100
10
100
Aug Oct
Dec
Feb
Apr Ju
lO
ctFe
b
Aug Feb
May Ju
lN
ovFe
bM
ayA
ug Mar
Aug Feb
Aug
Feb
Aug
10
100
AguadaEcotoneForest
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Min
imum
Num
ber
Kno
wn
Aliv
e / G
rid
O. degus
A. longipilisA
ugOct
Dec
Feb
Apr Ju
lO
ctFe
b
Aug Feb
May Ju
lN
ovFe
bM
ayA
ug Mar
Aug Feb
Aug
Feb
Aug
10
100
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
10
100 Thorn scrub
• Dramatic changes in the thorn scrub
• Different representation in the fog forest
• Less variation in the aguadas
Aguada
Forest
Peripheral habitats may be refuges during droughts
Two species with different spatial dynamics
Characterization of residency status
A. longipilis & some other species persist in peripheral habitats, and may colonize thorn scrub during rainy years
O. degus along with some other species maintain breeding populations in the thorn scrub
“Core species”
“Opportunistic species”
We then posited alternating “top-down” vs. “bottom-up” dynamics in this system
This view seemed supported by results of food-addition experiments
Octodon degus
0
10
100
Min
imum
Num
ber
Kno
wn
Aliv
e / G
rid
Phyllotis darwini
J S N J M M J S N J M M
0
10
100
CONTROLFOOD ADDITION
1997 1998 1999
* * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * *
*
Abrothrix longipilis
0
10
100
Min
imu
m N
um
be
r K
no
wn
Aliv
e /
Grid
Oligoryzomys longicaudatus
J S N J M M J S N J M M
0
10
100
CONTROLFOOD ADDITION
1997 1998 1999
*
* *
Two core species Two opportunistic species
But modeling shows that populations of many of the species here are also affected
by intrinsic regulatory factors
• There are strong interactions between rainfall and density in more numerous rodent species in the community, including Octodon degus
r r 2 2 = 0.94= 0.94
pp <<<< 0.0010.001
RRtt == -7.2-7.2 – – 0.8 ln(0.8 ln(OdOdt-1t-1//ClCltt))
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1
-2-1
01
23
4
Rt
ln(Odt-1/Clt)
+ E+ Ett+ 1.3 + 1.3 ln(Clln(Clt-1t-1))
3 4 5 6
-3-2
-10
12
Rt
lnClt-1
Model incorporating density & rainfall explains most changes in degu populations
ln(Odt-1/Clt)
65%
t 6%lnClt-129%
So where are we now?
• Biotic interactions such as predation have relatively small effects on small mammals in this assemblage
• “Bottom-up” factors due to aperiodic rainfall events have major effects on all elements of the community
• Density-dependence and lagged effects of rainfall are important drivers of small mammal population dynamics
• Spatial heterogeneity explains presence/absence of some small mammal species during wet vs. dry years
• Continued monitoring of small mammals, predators and plants, as well as studies of birds & insects
• Separation of effects of lagomorphs vs. small mammals on the vegetation community
Current directions
Selective exclusions of lagomorphs and/or small mammals
Monitoring of lagomorph activity
↑ Before counts
After counts →
• Studies of competitive interactions among shrubs, and native and introduced ephemerals
• Studies of long-term effects of climate change on community components
Recently, we have detected suggestive changes in the small mammal assemblage
Time (seasons)
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Pro
port
ion
of to
tal s
mal
l mam
mal
bio
mas
s
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Prop. Opportunistic speciesProp. Octodon degusProp. Core species other than O. degus
Core species biomass (especially O. degus) has become more constant
Time (seasons)NR89R89
NR90R90
NR91R91
NR92R92
NR93R93
NR94R94
NR95R95
NR96R96
NR97R97
NR98R98
NR99R99
NR00R00
NR01R01
NR02R02
NR03R03
NR04R04
NR05R05
NR06R06
NR07R07
NR08R08
NR09
Sha
nnon
div
ersi
ty in
dex
H'
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Shannon diversity values have also become more stable
• Mean rainfall increased from 111 mm in 1989-1999 to 160 mm in 2000-2008• Global Climatic Change may bring increased rainfall to Norte Chico region of Chile
Consequences of global climatic change…
1.Increased rainfall in Norte Chico region may trigger major changes in small mammal assemblage dynamics;2.Changes in numbers of herbivorous rodents may alter competitive interactions among native and exotic ephemeral plants;3.Introduced groups such as lagomorphs and ephemeral plants may have greater impacts; and:4.Destabilization of community-level interactions may include vertebrate predators, disease vectors, and other biotic elements (e.g., birds, insects) as well as larger scale processes
We recognize our many support sources…
the contributions of many, many people…
--and a cast of literally thousands
Questions?
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Pre
dato
r ab
unda
nce
0
25
50
75
100
125 L. culpaeus
B. magellanicus
T. alba
A. cunicularia
Rod
ent d
ensi
ty (
MN
KA
/ha)
0
50
100
150
200 P. darwini A. olivaceus
O. degus
Pla
nt c
over
, se
ed d
ensi
ty
0
20
40
60
80
100
Y A
xis
2
Ephemerals Shrubs
Seeds
Ann
ual p
reci
pita
tion
(mm
)
0
100
200
300
400
Rainfall
Average