topics appropriate to experiments projects with limited and well-defined concepts. projects that are...
TRANSCRIPT
Topics Appropriate to Experiments
• Projects with limited and well-defined concepts.
• Projects that are exploratory rather than descriptive.
• Studies of small group interaction.
Components of Experiments
• Independent and dependent variables• Pretesting and posttesting• Experimental and control groups– Stimulus and no stimulus
Experimental andControl Groups
• Must be as similar as possible.• Control or Comparison group represents what
the experimental group would have been like had it not been exposed to the stimulus.
Experiment
Two & Half Men
• Short clip making fun of the experimental design in testing drugs
Selecting Subjects
• Probability sampling• Randomization• Matching
Randomization and Matching
• May not know which variables will be relevant for matching process.
• Most statistics used to analyze results assume randomization.
• Randomization only makes sense if you have a large pool of subjects.
Internal Validity
• Refers to the possibility that the conclusions drawn from experimental results may not accurately reflect what went on in the experiment itself.
• Did something other than the experimental stimulus affect the dependent variable?
Sources of Internal Invalidity
• Historical events may occur during the course of the experiment.
• Maturation of the subjects.• Testing and retesting can influence behavior.• Instrumentation
Sources of Internal Invalidity
• Selection biases.• Experimental mortality - subjects drop out of
the study before it's completed.
External Validity
• Refers to the possibility that conclusions drawn from experimental results may not be generalizable to the “real” world.
• Is the experimental setting unrealistic?• Is pre-testing influencing the subjects (i.e.
cueing them in on what the researcher wants)
Limiting External Invalidity
Solomon Four Group Design - Four groups of subjects, assigned randomly:
• Groups 1 and 2 are the control and experimental group.
• Group 3 does not have the pre-test.• Group 4 is only posttested.
Solomon Four-Group Design
–G1:Pretest-stimulus-posttest–G2:Pretest-posttest–G3:Stimulus-posttest–G4:posttest
Solomon Four-Group Design
Example
• Champney and Edleman. 2010. “Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in United States Government Courses”
• Available on WebCampus (not required reading).
Posttest-only Control Group Design
• Includes Groups 3 and 4 of the Solomon design.
• With proper randomization, only these groups are needed to control problems of internal invalidity and the interaction between testing and stimulus.
• Commonly done in the social sciences
Web-based Experiments
• Increasingly, researchers are using the World Wide Web to conduct experiments.
• Because representative samples are not essential in some experiments, researchers use volunteers who respond to invitations online.
Experimental Method
Strengths:• Isolation of the experimental variable over
time.• Experiments can be replicated several times
using different groups of subjects.
Experimental Method
Weaknesses:• Artificiality of laboratory setting.• Social processes that occur in a lab might not
occur in a more natural social setting.
Example of Experiments in Political Science
• Mendelberg, Tali. 1997. Executing Hortons: Racial Crime in the 1988 Presidential Campaign. The Public Opinion Quarterly 61(1, Spring): 134-157.
• Available on WebCampus (not required reading).
Methodology
• Experiment• 77 white students at U of M• Median age was 18• Treatment group shown the ad, control group
was not• OLS regression (not a T-test)
Findings
• Students shown the Horton ad were more likely to have negative views on race and racial policies
• Students shown the Horton ad did not have different views on crime
The End
• Read Levin and Fox Ch. 7– Will go over homework assignment
• Read Matland, Richard E. 1994. “Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters.” British Journal of Political Science 24, 2: 273-92.
• Available on WebCampus