toward a pedagogy for critical media literacy

44
TOWARD A PEDAGOGY FOR CRITICAL MEDIA LITERACY by DARREN G. ALEXANDER © 2000, Darren Alexander (Creative Commons) 2010, Darren Alexander contact [email protected] Introduction Abstract: The intentions of this paper are as follows: 1. To highlight the need for and value of critical media literacy education. 2. To propose, by way of contribution, the development of a pedagogy for those educators and advocates who will develop and share such skills. 3. To re-assert (what many others have said before me) that cultural groundwork is an essential intermediary stage toward humanely progressive societal change. 4. To emphasize the need for the increased development and organization of independent media operators, centres, networks and cultural workers, to support the development, production, and distribution of such work. I will not in this paper make an argument against the extreme and obscene nature of capitalism (or corporatism, as John Ralston Saul calls it) as the currently predominate global force in terms of socio-economic policy and its resultant anti-democratic and exploitative effects on media, culture, and society. These themes have been thoroughly and successfully managed by many others before me. Instead I ask that that position be assumed throughout, and further that the reader make a clear distinction between the media that is corporate and profit-driven (what is typically referred to as the mass media) and other forms of independently produced media. That is a good first step toward any critical media literacy education, and I will expand on this distinction further in the pages ahead. I will begin by spelling out the necessary terms of reference. As mentioned above, I will do so not by defining the terms so much as putting them forward, and placing them into some (hopefully) relevant context. Thus, by way of association and reference to the ideas and definitions of others I hope that the reader may assemble for him or herself the pertinent meanings, as they relate to my discussions.

Upload: darrenalexander

Post on 18-Jan-2016

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A research paper that supports the promotion of a critical literacy in order to decode and undermine corporate and hegemonic messaging in mainstream media.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

TOWARD A PEDAGOGY FOR CRITICAL MEDIA LITERACY

by DARREN G. ALEXANDER

© 2000, Darren Alexander (Creative Commons) 2010, Darren Alexander contact [email protected] Introduction

Abstract: The intentions of this paper are as follows:

1. To highlight the need for and value of critical media literacy education.

2. To propose, by way of contribution, the development of a pedagogy for those educators and

advocates who will develop and share such skills.

3. To re-assert (what many others have said before me) that cultural groundwork is an essential

intermediary stage toward humanely progressive societal change.

4. To emphasize the need for the increased development and organization of independent media

operators, centres, networks and cultural workers, to support the development, production, and

distribution of such work.

I will not in this paper make an argument against the extreme and obscene nature of capitalism

(or corporatism, as John Ralston Saul calls it) as the currently predominate global force in terms

of socio-economic policy and its resultant anti-democratic and exploitative effects on media,

culture, and society. These themes have been thoroughly and successfully managed by many

others before me. Instead I ask that that position be assumed throughout, and further that the

reader make a clear distinction between the media that is corporate and profit-driven (what is

typically referred to as the mass media) and other forms of independently produced media. That is

a good first step toward any critical media literacy education, and I will expand on this distinction

further in the pages ahead.

I will begin by spelling out the necessary terms of reference. As mentioned above, I will do so not

by defining the terms so much as putting them forward, and placing them into some (hopefully)

relevant context. Thus, by way of association and reference to the ideas and definitions of others I

hope that the reader may assemble for him or herself the pertinent meanings, as they relate to my

discussions.

Page 2: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

2

Critical Media Literacy: Getting at the meaning

Defining Media:

No dictionary definitions here—they would only serve to exacerbate the difficulties in arriving at

the gist of a term that is so layered with meaning as media is today. Besides, it’s not so much a

concise definition that’s required as it is a useful one. So I will try here to define the term by

selecting the essential features from that spectrum of priori definitions:

Media, as the derivative apparatus of Communications, refers to the variety of modalities

used to convey meaningful information.

Media, therefore, are features of communication which act simultaneously as

transmission/distribution systems as well as being content providers. The more obvious

modalities, or media, would include the following:

Radio (transmission of oral content);

Print (newspapers, magazines, etc. for the transmission of print/visual content);

Film/video and digital multimedia forms, including the internet and CD’s/DVD’s etc. (which

convey a combination of sensorial content). Likewise, analog forms such as cassette tapes and

phonograph records may be construed as sound media.

The not-so-obvious modalities of media require a slight abstraction from the typical forms noted

above. A lecturer in action at a podium might be considered a medium, for example, as she

conveys meaningful content (orally, perhaps with the aid of other media) to students and others in

the hall.

To abstract the definition further still, the lecture hall itself may be considered a medium, for it is

a modality (or space) in which the transfer of meaningful information takes place. In this

definition we arrive most closely at one essential of communications theory posited by scholars

such as Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan, namely that an environmental situation may pose as

a medium for communication. It is through this assertion that we arrive at the potential for

‘invisibility’ of media or a medium, the way McLuhan suggested that a fish is likely unaware of

the water it swims in, its taken-for-granted environment.

Page 3: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

3

Defining Critical:

Why critical media literacy? First, because the phrase media literacy on its own is often used in

reference to a fluency in the technical skills involved in the use of media resources (cameras,

computers, etc.), as opposed to getting at a critical understanding of their roles and implications.

So it helps to discern between the two. That said, I should acknowledge here that Neil Postman

and many others do indeed use the phrase media literacy with the implied critical connotation.

But there are divergent opinions as to how radical an educational process media literacy should

be. For instance, some would contend that media literacy be applied to make better “consumer”

choices, or to enhance media appreciation. Not to get bogged down in contradictions of terms, but

the addition of critical makes it clear, I believe, that media literacy “is fundamentally about

power relations.” (Jay Dover and Viveca Greene, The Media Literacy Antidote, from We the

Media.)

Second, because the phrase critical literacy is already in popular use, referring to a progressive

literacy model which aims to provide the reader of any text with the skills to understand (often

through deconstruction methods) the implications, agendas, or biases attached.

And third, because critical attention to media is essential when the means and construction of

expression are concentrated among large corporations. Why? Because the resultant implications

shape the way we perceive ourselves and our world reality. Wittgenstein and other philosophers

have long pointed to the power of language to shape our realities. And in his essay A Cultural

Approach to Communication, James Carey notes how “reality is brought into existence, is

produced, by communication—by, in short, the construction, apprehension, and utilization of

symbolic forms” (p.25, Communication as Culture) It is the corporate mass media that is today

largely responsible for constructing and communicating such forms.

Defining Literacy:

As mentioned above, literacy is already predisposed to associations with media (as in media

literacy) and critical (as in critical literacy). I especially like the term for its inherent connections

with the ‘old school’ literacies, namely reading, writing, and arithmetic. Such literacies are

considered essential components to early educational curriculums everywhere, and the lack

thereof considered detrimental to the potential welfare of the society at large. I suggest that the

‘new school’ literacy, ie. critical media literacy, be considered equally essential given the value of

such literacy today.

Page 4: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

4

Media and Culture: the Connection

Media is responsible, in a large part, for mediating our culture.

We’re being told that the only thing that matters is the marketplace, that things that matter to us as citizens and as a nation are less valuable than the business elite’s right to unfettered corporate profits. The media have played a big role in selling us this idea. (Gail Lem, from “Media Think”: Corporate ownership threatens democracy, in Canadian Perspectives, Summer 1997)

In fact, it would appear that a capitalist driven system of communications and media works with

an effort to support, maintain and progress what might be called a capitalist culture, using the

mass media (and educational systems, as expanded on below) to indoctrinate the ‘participants’.

The result is what Baudrillard refers to as the Lowest Common Culture. Friere calls it the culture

of silence, referring to the lack of Subjective involvement and participation in shaping our culture.

Here’s how Marshall McLuhan foresaw the development, more than forty years before the world

would witness the mega-mergers of the world’s largest corporations (such as AOL and Warner),

corporations founded on media:

We are swiftly moving at present from an era when business was our culture into an era when culture will be our business. Between these poles stand the huge and ambiguous entertainment industries. As the new media unfold their powers, the entertainment industries swallow more and more of the old business culture. The movie industry is thus an inseparable portion of the advertising industry in providing the necessary drama of consumption, in which the ads merely provide the news. (from an unpublished essay, 1957, printed in On McLuhan)

Clearly, the mass media serves primarily as trumpeters for those in power. Their messages

suggest that the current culture of production (via disassociated work, as opposed to, say,

meaningful and creative labour) and consumption (of fabricated and dictated desires, as opposed

to, say, sustainable needs) is somehow what we asked for. Via delivery mediums which in the end

dictate ‘public opinion’ and ‘public policy’, mediums such as the mass media and both ‘public’

and ‘private’ educational systems, we citizen-consumers have been hoodwinked into playing our

Page 5: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

5

lives by the corporate rules. Programmed into conformity, most of us are complicit in corporate

culture, whether we like it or not. It is, after all, like the water is to the fish, the medium in which

we live and function.

We must acknowledge that our mainstream modes of communication have been so close to

completely co-opted to date as to render them virtually useless as channels to promote a critical

literacy of the sort that will promote an awakening out of that “culture of silence” of which Friere

wrote (more on this in Section II), and to become active participants for a cultural revolution. One

thing all of these media have in common is that, by their very nature or modality, they are telling

us how to proceed within the capitalist context, i.e. as consumers (for instance: a book is a

commodity, to be bought or sold). It is likely, as Baudrillard and others have suggested, that the

reception (and digestion) of the commodified media transmission (via print, tv, or other media)

itself becomes the action, thereby displacing the potential for any ‘real’ (politically inclined)

action, that which is considered a prerequisite for change.

According to such suggestion, the content in any mass media becomes largely irrelevant. At least

so far as the potential for action is concerned. When somebody reads a ‘newspaper’, then, he is

typically not so much relating to the stories as he is participating in the act of reading a

newspaper. The same goes for a documentary on television or in the theatre. It becomes the

experience of seeing a film. It becomes a cultural activity, providing little inspiration or

motivation for political action or participation. Sure, some stories motivate a few to donate to a

cause, or to contribute some support or assistance towards a relief effort. But by and large their

meaning dissolves into a banal media bliss.

For that matter, there are those who have suggested that even so-called culturally progressive

(critical, independent ) media, or cultural work, can work likewise to dissipate the political

potential which many consider necessary for change. Radical activist and playwright Bertolt

Brecht, for instance, was concerned that political art “would act as a sort of pressure release valve

for dissatisfaction” and “he was concerned that people would mentally and emotionally resolve

their political anxieties through culture, when the real resolution of these problems could only

happen by confronting power in the political realm”. (Stephen Duncombe, Notes from

Underground, p. 190)

There can be no doubt, though, as to the inherent connection between culture and politics. In his

work on zines and the politics of alternative culture, Duncombe provides not only one of the

neater definitions for culture that I’ve come across (and there are many) but he also identifies this

relationship:

Page 6: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

6

Culture: artistic creation, is an expression of culture: tradition

and lived experience. Both the Culture that people enjoy and the

culture in which they are embedded provide them with ideas

about how things are and how they should be, or, more

accurately, with frameworks through which to interpret reality

and possiblity. Culture helps us account for the past, make sense

of the present, and imagine the future. This is why it is so deeply

political.” (p.175)

An important distinction to make, then, as Duncombe relates, is that “(c)ulture may be one of the

spaces where the struggle over ways of seeing, thinking, and being takes place, but it is not where

this struggle ends.” (p.193) He refers to the work of revolutionary leader Antonio Gramsci (leader

of the first Italian Communist Party), and scholars of the Centre for Contemporary Cultural

Studies Birmingham (CCCS) who all suggested that counter-hegemonic cultures are ‘pre-

political’ formations which provide the necessary but not sufficient condition for social change.

Thus it might be argued (as I will) that cultural work is valuable and essential for directly or

indirectly cultivating socio-political change.

Page 7: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

7

Media is Education

In the year 2000, the formal forms of Education and Media—the products, the institutions, the

delivery systems—are virtually indistinguishable in form and content. Both (wherever it is that

one begins and the other ends) are typically products of private, corporate interests. Try to

identify the place where a text book or a film, on any subject whatsoever, stops being a product

and starts being an educational experience. A text book is a commodity. A classroom is a stage.

From all of these products and scenarios we are informed, exposed to the communication which

shapes our thoughts, our perceptions of reality and of ourselves.

Many scholars have previously exposed the oppressive interests that currently shape the formal

school environments and curriculums, at all levels, from the content of the texts and learning

materials through to the physical form and architectural design of the environments (Ivan Illych

in particular comes to mind). Further, it may be argued that most of our education, as that which

transforms or informs our culture, is informed via media other than formal classroom settings.

Marshall McLuhan was acutely aware of this phenomenon in the early years of television, as he

recognized its inevitable role, one way or the other, as a great ‘educator’:

I would suggest that if you were to put the TV in the classroom, it would blow the classroom to bits...It would not be an incidental teaching aid, it would simply alter the entire pattern and procedures of the classroom, and create an altogether new educational form. However, this has, in effect, happened since TV is already the environmental force that is shaping the awareness and outlook of children everywhere. It is already doing this anyway, so whether it goes into the classroom or not is really not a great issue. (from Take Thirty, CBC Television, 1965, as quoted in On McLuhan)

If media is so crucially linked to education and, thus, our culture, essentially as an informant,

then it stands to reason that access to and mastery of the media is critical for the purpose of

education and cultural transformation. Hence the attention to media in this capacity.

Page 8: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

8

On Cultural Work

Maintaining the premises expressed above, namely a. the inherent symbiotic relationship between

media, education and culture, and b. that cultural development is a necessary precursor, an

intermediary stage, to more directed socio-political potential (for action, and change), it stands to

reason that those effecting or informing the culture are potentially contributors to that effect.

Combine that role with a sensibility (or a politic?) that is informed by an education in Critical

Media Literacy, and you have what I would call a Cultural Worker.

The role of the cultural worker then would be to apply critical media literacy skills to the

production of anything that might potentially contribute to or inform the culture. It is important to

note that in so doing, the cultural worker is supporting counter-hegemonic culture, either in

reaction against the dominant culture, or by promoting alternatives. These events or products or

productions typically relate to some form of media. Following is a list of just some of the

practical possibilities:

Courses and curricula, promotional materials and advertising, posters, banners, postcards, forums,

workshops, musicals, novels, poetry, parades, exhibits, festivals, cabarets, speaking tours, radio

and television programs, videos and films, cartoons, websites, chants and songs...these might all

be seen as the educational (or culture-informing) products of cultural workers. (Examples of

many of these can be seen in the Appendix, and will be referred to in Section II of this paper.)

Note that the contribution of cultural workers can vary and that the field calls on a variety of

skills and abilities: Educators, artists, organizers, administrators, researchers, skilled and

‘unskilled’ trades and laborers all figure into such work. I’d like to point out here the source of

my original inspiration as relates to this contemporary concept of ‘cultural worker’. What follows

is the Mission Statement of an organization that is called the Syracuse Cultural Workers,

responsible for the production and distribution of everything from posters, calendars and day-

timers to t-shirts, learning aids, and books (next page):

Page 9: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

9

SYRACUSE CULTURAL WORKERS (SCW) is an educational and cultural organization founded in 1982. Our mission is to help create a culture that honors diversity and celebrates community; that inspires and nurtures justice, equality and freedom; that respects our fragile Earth and all its beings; that encourages and supports all forms of creative expression. We see cultural work as an essential part of and support for political and economic change. Many of our materials celebrate movements for social change and their leaders, thus helping to legitimize history that is largely ignored or trivialized by commercial media and school textbooks. SCW also helps to unite socially concerned artists with a growing audience hungry for meaningful work. (from the SCW Tools for Change Catalogue, 1998-99, see Appendix i)

On the one hand, the work of those cultural workers who perform quietly, simply, traditionally

(typically by the oral tradition) must not be underestimated in terms of its relevance and potential.

Some would argue in fact that that is the only way to truly affect culture. That said, to be effective

on a larger scale it would seem essential that cultural workers must have or gain access to media

production resources, facilities, networks, and distribution channels for their ‘products’. Thus a

case must be made, and an effort maintained, to support this end. (I will briefly revisit this theme

in my conclusion.)

Toward a pedagogy for cultural workers

Finally, in an effort to further the potential for such work, it is essential that those involved

continue to teach and to learn. The foundation must surely be an education in critical media

literacy. And I would suggest that such a literacy is informed mostly by one recurring and all-

important feature, one that, as mentioned in the SCW statement above, is typically (and

purposefully) omitted or censured from the stories we receive through commercial media: history.

By revisiting closely the theories and contemplations recorded by thinkers, do’ers and writers

who have come before, we fare a better chance of contributing more effectively as cultural

workers. After all, we have available to us the treatises, the products of intensive thought and

research, the efforts by those who made it their lives’ work to make some sense of our cultural

and societal macro patterns and potentialities, our political developments and reforms, our

technological and communications advances, and our capacities for teaching and learning and

transforming who we are, as individuals or in forms of larger communities or societies.

Page 10: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

10

In the next section I offer a summary exploration of several educational theorists who have

contributed largely, over the last few decades, to the latest ideas on how language ability is

achieved. It is an obvious arena, I think, for a pedagogical source of reference to inform critical

media literacy. After all, regardless of the modality or media, most of our education and

information is communicated by way of the word or some related text.

It opens with a quote from one of the foremost critical literacy educators of the century, Paulo

Friere…

Page 11: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

11

SECTION II Toward a Pedagogy for Cultural Work

As we attempt to analyze dialogue as a human phenomenon, we discover something which is the essence of dialogue itself: the word. But the word is more than just an instrument which makes dialogue possible; accordingly, we must seek its constitutive elements. Within the word we find two dimensions, reflection and action, in such radical interaction that if one is sacrificed—even in part—the other immediately suffers. There is no true word that is not at the same time a praxis. Thus, to speak a true word is to transform the world. (from Paulo Friere’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed, p. 75)

Educational theorists working in the latter half of this past century have made significant

contributions to our relationship with the word. They have sought, through diverse

methodologies, to contribute to our understanding of the word and the part it plays in our

perceptions of who we are. For language (be it through dialogue, or text, or any other medium) is,

for a large part, what we as humans use to define the entire range of our experience. It is no

wonder then that the learning of language has occupied the minds of so many of society’s greatest

thinkers from across the disciplines, not just those working in the arena of education.

In the quote above, Paulo Friere, a revolutionary theorist and literacy educator, makes clear the

potency of the word as it relates to praxis. Friere defines praxis essentially as the transformation

of the word (or theory), with reflection, into work (or action). In his now infamous treatise,

Pedagogy of the Oppressed, he makes a strong case for praxis as a necessary factor for

revolutionary cultural action, that which can liberate the oppressed from systemic oppression:

The pedagogy of the oppressed, as a humanist and libertarian pedagogy, has two distinct stages. In the first, the oppressed unveil the world of oppression and through the praxis commit themselves to its transformation. In the second stage, in which the reality of oppression has already been transformed, this pedagogy ceases to belong to the oppressed and becomes a pedagogy of all men in the process of permanent liberation. (p. 40)

If praxis indeed begins with the word as Friere suggests, it is essential to pay close attention to

the contributions of those whose work has illuminated the magic of the word. With few

exceptions, those educational theorists and semioticians and linguists have pointed to one thing in

common: the socially transformative power of the word. It can be easy to overlook, inundated as

Page 12: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

12

we are with texts representing a vast array of modalities, delivered by a plethora of mediums.

To get at the word is to get one step closer to an understanding, an empathetic relation, to what it

means to be human. The study of language, then, especially as it relates to education, inherently

contributes to the humanist tradition of Friere and other revolutionary theorists.

Thus, in the search for theory which can inform critical media literacy to transform society and

culture, it seems a practical choice to examine the theories of those who’ve dedicated their

intellectual pursuits to the understanding of how we interpret language and the word. I present

ahead a digest of several of those theorists, while seeking to make some connections between the

ideas (as they relate to education) and the praxis (as it relates to cultural work, quite similar in

concept to Friere’s concept of ‘revolutionary cultural action’). Thus what follows might serve as a

contribution toward the pedagogical foundation for critical media literacy education.

Page 13: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

13

Frank Smith

Frank Smith is a psycholinguist whose contributions have had a great influence on the day’s

current concepts around literacy and education. His seminal work, Understanding Reading

(published in 1975), provided a reading theory that would lay the foundation for many subsequent

developments in reading theory. While his ideas were essentially formed around the reading of

printed text, those with interests in the range of education, media and communication theory

(including semiotics, sociolinguistics...) could easily find his theoretical framework relevant and

transcribable to the analysis, understanding, and deconstruction of other texts as well, including

visual and multi-media texts.

The central tenet of constructivism is that each individual constructs a view of his or her world based on his or her experience of it. This premise runs throughout Smith’s entire argument. (Frank Smith: Psycholinguist, by Terry D. Johnson)

Note how the humanist notion of constructivism, as quoted above and relating to the work of

Frank Smith, possesses an abundance of meaningful analogies to critical literacy and the

promotion of counter-culture. This makes constructivist models in general astoundingly relevant

to a pedagogy for cultural work.

Frank Smith’s Whole Language

Smith proposed that a reader ‘predicts’ letters, words, and perhaps even larger fragments of text,

applying a sort of feature analysis that recognizes patterns from prior knowledge or previous

experience. His theories, published from 1971, broke rank with the up-to-then predominant

adherence to bottom-up constructivism which, through it’s resultant effects on school curriculum,

turned learning to read into a study of artificial texts and decontextualized exercises. Smith and

his colleagues laid the theoretical foundation to what came to be called whole language, a model

which would introduce “real books” to the classroom, replacing or complementing the banal

reader which relied so heavily on the teaching and learning of isolated parts and fragments of

Page 14: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

14

words and language. The implications of whole language had a tremendous impact on the

pedagogy of reading and related school curriculum for the future. To this day the concept holds

posterity.

One of Smith’s basic premises is that reading is a language activity that is learned much like

speaking. Children apparently develop and test their own simplified “theories” based on what

they hear around them as they try out speech. “Successful theories result in successful

communication and survive. Unsuccessful theories result in communication difficulties and die.”

(FS: Psycholinguist, Who is Frank Smith?) Likewise, according to Smith, children learning to

read are testing out their current hypotheses word by word, responding to confirmation (or even

lack of dis-confirmation) until they reach a level of literacy by which reading becomes self-

confirming.

Applying Smith’s models to Cultural Work

Essentially Frank Smith has provided a model which enhances our understanding of how we read

language, or how language informs us, and the process of comprehension. Extrapolating from this

model, we might consider the value of identifying and utilizing how prediction and feature

analysis figure into communications of all sorts, in all mediums. One obvious application would

be toward the deconstruction of corporate communication, to better understand and share with

community the knowledge as to how the insidious process of cultural domination is cultivated by

the proliferation of their texts, signs and symbols.

Logos and brand names, for instance, rely heavily on notions such as prediction and feature

analysis, for their quick (almost thoughtless) recognition and relative ‘value’. The fact is that

directly or indirectly much of Smith’s groundwork has already been applied to efforts around

critical media literacy, especially toward the ‘decoding’ of corporate messages in, for example,

commercial media and advertisements.

Frank Smith said, “(t)he effort to read through decoding is largely futile and unnecessary.” As

such, much of his work went into challenging the commonly held belief that reading was a

bottom-up decoding exercise, suggesting that our short-term memory could not likely

accommodate such a cumbersome operational process. Instead, Smith contends, we have likely

developed processes (prediction, feature analysis, and others) to simplify and expedite the act.

Page 15: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

15

The flip-side to this is an understanding of how insidious textual messages can be. Smith also

claimed that “there is nothing special about reading” and that “it makes no special demands on

the brain”. These notions could help to explain how we as citizen-consumers can appear so un-

critical when it comes to our acceptance and digestion of media transmissions. Perhaps we are

‘reading’ them without really thinking about them, in a way that seems as though we have

developed some predisposition to the task. (The way it seems that there is some generational

aptitude developed for driving a car?) This could suggest that readers today are prone to digest

information readily, uncritically, the result of our (generationally?) developed literacy skills.

Here McLuhan applies an apt analogy:

I am in the position of Louis Pasteur telling doctors that their greatest enemy was quite invisible and quite unrecognized by them. Our conventional response to all media—namely, that it is how they are used that counts—is the numb stance of the technological idiot. For the content of a medium is like the juicy piece of meat carried by the burglar to distract the watchdog of the mind. The effect of the medium is made strong and intense just because it is given another medium as content. The content of a movie is a novel or a play or an opera. The effect of the movie form is not related to its program content. The content of writing or print is speech, but the reader is almost entirely unaware either of print or of speech. (Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964)

Critical media theorists have long identified the unconscious subversion that is employed by

corporations (and governments and other power players) in their advertisements, promotions, and

other communications. Everything from the intentionally (yet obviously) subliminal (sneaking

sexual connotations into the compositions, for instance) to the overt deployance of idyllic role-

models (sports and entertainment personalities, for instance, with their built in signifiers) and

decontextualized copy (where the text has nothing to do with the product), a close examination of

the features of media bring true intentions to light. That said, now more than ever there seems to

be a (postmodernist?) obviousness about their intentions, and largely the reaction by the

‘consumer’ public is a kitschy revelry in it all. Is it thus possible that the ground meaning of the

ads, the hidden text behind the promotions, have come to be understood and even accepted, as

givens? Perhaps this is a feature of our condition, of postmodern capitalist culture?

Page 16: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

16

More Application: Smith and Culture Jamming

A flip-side approach to Smith’s theories may also assist in the pro-active production of texts for

the purpose of progressive cultural generation or cultural work. Of course it is possible to borrow

from the tactics of the corporate sales pitches (above) to promote not products for consumption

but rather events or services of cultural value. But there is always something ‘slimy’ about

adopting those devices, for it is noticeably insulting to the critical thinker. Thus, I suggest that the

more beneficial potential is found not in co-opting the application of hidden ground for

propaganda so much as to subvert and expose the existing tradition, thereby providing a public

education service, of sorts, in critical literacy.

By breaking tradition with the expectations of prediction and feature analysis (which, Smith

would suggest, reduces the unlikely possibilities for a reader), a powerful post-modern tool is

wrought to wield against the corporate culture. Culture Jamming is one such method, whereby

the typical and expected logos and copy or other associations are ‘adjusted’ or ‘reinvented’ in

order to change the message from one which counts on consumer apathy to creative, cultural

resistance. Following are two fine definitions of the concepts, as found within the pages of

Adbusters Magazine, a pioneering purveyor of such cultural strategies:

The brands, products, fashions and entertainments—the spectacles that surround the production of culture—are our culture now. Only by “uncooling” these icons and symbols, by organizing resistance against the power trust that manages the brands, can America reassert itself. (Adbusters Magazine, no.29, p.50) “One-off pranks, gestures and goofs serve the function of creating cognitive dissonance and interrupting the public routine. They have a very short half-life, twinkling briefly then vanishing. But if they’re ongoing and reinforced by the mass media, they begin to take on weight and significance.” (Adbusters Magazine, no.29, in A Jammers (sic) Guide to Reclaiming Urban Space)

Praxis: “Stop the WTO” was like a rallying cry to protesters and activists to prepare for the WTO

talks in Seattle. Stop signs throughout North America were converted from ordinary traffic

messages to billboards promoting the cause, as bold lettered stickers reading “the WTO” were

slapped beneath the central message, “STOP”, for all motorists and passers-by to see...an

excellent example of culture jamming. (See a similar example in Appendix ii)

Page 17: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

17

Smith and Chomsky:

Putting the parts together

Just as the break-with-expectations approach of culture jamming would suggest, the flipside of

Smith’s theories seemingly imply that the deconstruction of a text is where the demands come in

to play, in terms of those critical, applied thinking (cognitive) skills. This idea would support the

need for promotion of critical analysis and deconstruction of texts (of any communications) as a

path to greater understanding of their meaning and intent. Perhaps it is ironic that Noam

Chomsky, noted linguist, is now more widely known for his efforts to just that effect, exposing

the corporate bias in the media, and identifying how corporations have been able to “manufacture

consent” via their handling of messages through the media. Prior to that work, though,

Chomsky’s formidable contributions to the understanding of language (in the late 50’s and early

60’s) involved deconstructing the grammar of sentences into a variety of definitve generative and

transformational rules. Such cognitive rules, he has suggested, could actually be part of our

genetic make-up. This genetic aptitude, like a wired in ‘language acquisition device’, is what

facilitates the language learning phenomenon. Interestingly, Chomsky’s contributions in terms of

breaking down grammar into its constituent parts seems to represent exactly what Smith rallies

against, when it comes to education. Chomsky’s finding are in fact complementary, however, as

they support Smith’s claim that language acquisition and comprehension, via reading, relies on

some form of preconditioning.

Smith doesn’t deny that (likely complex) parts make up the whole; rather, his argument relates to

the comprehension of the parts as they relate to the whole, suggesting that readers or learners can

cursorily gloss (or quickscan?) over that information which is already somehow familiar to them.

Whether that information is familiar by previous engagement or experience, or whether it is

familiar due to some predisposed genetic make-up, or a combination of both—it still recognizes

that the constituent parts are necessary and meaningful in terms of the text’s composition. Given

this notion of quickscanning, then, and when it comes to reading the text, it makes sense that

those same constituent parts should become the hidden ground to the text. Thus reading a

newspaper, as an example—with its smaller constituent parts being the articles themselves—

becomes an act not of reading the articles, but reading the paper. Perhaps we are quickscanning

the content, not seeing the articles for the newspaper and in doing so we have made the content

irrelevant. (Note: Pictures and advertisements, on the other hand, would command special

attention due to their visual emphasis. In the context of “print”, “graphics” seem to override, or

Page 18: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

18

divert, the cognitive attention. ) That’s when a return to the parts becomes meaningful again. As

Chomsky has made clear in his determined pursuits, a detailed deconstruction of the content (or

lack thereof) can provide clear and meaningful messages, messages which answer to the question

(oft-cited by McLuhan), what’s going on here?

Praxis: Such deconstruction methods are especially useful for exposing the terminology and

double-speak typically used to further the corporate agenda. See Appendix iii for a Glossary

printed in the Council of Canadians’ publication Canadian Perspectives (Fall 1997) which

deciphers the language of economic globalization.

Page 19: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

19

Schema Theory

In Understanding Reading Smith introduced the notion of schemes or schemas as complex

conceptual structures which function as organizational categories to assist and promote

comprehension. R.C. Anderson, David Rumelhart, Paul T. Wilson and others picked up on this

powerful model and developed the ideas further, in an effort to explain how a reader’s (or

learner’s) existing knowledge affects comprehension. Once again, as a model relevant to grasping

some essential tenets of the relationship between education and learning, schema theory provides

invaluable ‘tips’ as to how cultural workers might approach the educational aspect of their work.

Calling them “the building blocks of cognition”, Rumelhart suggested that schema (or

‘schemata’, as the plural form he and others have used) “are the fundamental elements upon

which all information processing depends” (Rumelhart, Schemata: The building blocks of

cognition.) As a model of explanation he applies the practical life situation of one entering a shop

to buy something, and suggests that this person would bring with him/her an understanding of a

BUY schema, for instance. Thus there would be a certain protocol (in dealing with the

salesperson, for example) and a number of criteria built in to the task of entering a shop for the

purpose of purchasing a product. He explains that “a schema is instantiated whenever a

particular configuration of values is bound to a particular configuration of variables at a particular

moment in time. Interpreting a situation to be an instance of some concept, such as an instance of

buying, involves, according to the present view, the instantiation of an appropriate schema, say

the BUY schema, by associating the various variables of the schema with the various aspects of

the situation”(p.36).

What Rumelhart and others have developed is something of a cognitive network, structurally

composed of schema which subdivide into ‘subschemata’, which helps to explain (or

accommodate) such concepts as perception and remembering. An initial experience will, for

example, help to form a schema. A second, related experience will then draw on that initial

schema, providing some ground to reinterpret and/or reconstruct the original interpretation

(italics represent Rumelhart’s terms). The idea, then, is that every individual develops their own

special bank of schema, a hierarchical (tree-like?) order of “slots that can be instantiated wth

specific information of knowledge” (Wilson, Anderson) based on inference through recursive

experience. Essentially the schema theory presents a model for our internal cognitive processing

structure, a model which Anderson relates to “ideational scaffolding” which bridges the gaps

between prior knowledge and new information, thereby creating new (holistic) understanding by

Page 20: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

20

integrating the old and the new.

It is worth noting that Anderson, in his contributions to schema theory, drew heavily from the

foundations of the Gestalt movement in psychology (which dates back to the early part of the

twentieth century). As a model with a holistic emphasis to the study of mental organization,

Gestalt theory suggests that the whole of any experience or situation could not be identified by its

parts, but rather that the interpretation must take into account the context of the whole. Thus

Gestalt theory may be seen as part of the foundational framework to all constructivist models and

approaches. Interestingly but not surprisingly, we can read below how Gestalt theory figured

prominently into the work of media theorist Marshall McLuhan:

It [ground] is a term from Gestalt psychology. Look at the ground around the figure of the automobile or the ground around any technology, which necessarily has a large ground of services and disservices associated with it. Now, the ordinary attention is fixed on the figure rather than the ground, on the wheel rather than the huge system of road services necessary to maintain the existence of a wheel or wheeled vehicles. With a motorcar, most people are interested in changing designs or patterns of the car. They pay only incidental attentions to the huge service environment of roads, oil companies, filling stations, and other allied services of manufacturing that are the ground of the car. The motorcar, when it was first introduced in the early part of the century, was thought to be a sure way of getting rid of cities by taking us back to the country. Watching the figure of the car, they saw the immediate possibility of simply transporting city dwellers back into the country where they came from...It never occurred to them that this figure of the car might generate a huge ground of new services far bigger than the figure was ever thought to be. In other words, the car created a totally new environment or ground of services and disservices that we have come to associate with the American way of life. By not looking at the ground around the automobile you miss the message of the car. For it is the ground of any technology that is the medium that changes everybody, and it is the medium that is the message of the technology, not the figure. (Marshall McLuhan, from “Marshall McLuhan”, interview by Willem L. Oltmans, 1972, as quoted in On McLuhan.)

Stuck in a schema: Another explanation for the media malaise

As to how the selections are made, or how the schema are activated, Rumelhart offers the (vague)

notion of “goodness to fit” (like natural selection?) as the evaluation criteria. A problem arises,

he points out, when a learner adopts a schema that is not a good fit. The result of an inappropriate

Page 21: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

21

schema he suggests, is something like a filtered distortion of perception, and as example he cites

an experiment (Bruner and Potter) in 1964 where subjects were shown slides of out-of-focus real

world objects and asked to identify what they were seeing. As the slide would be repeatedly

shown, each time a little more in focus, the subjects would find it very difficult to abandon their

initial (and often incorrect) identifications. Even as the objects came increasingly focused and

clear, they continued to misidentify what they were seeing, adhering instead to their original

identification. Rumelhart concludes that once the subjects were committed to their initial

identification, and thus had developed a mental schema that fit that perception, it was especially

difficult for them to adopt the contradictory information.

This model of unwillingness to change based on preconditioned schema would help to explain

how it is that a “culture of silence” can be prone to self-maintenance. If we are culturally

conditioned one way, then there is naturally a common schematic order that accompanies that

conditioning. A cultural shift, therefore, would require a (admittedly problematic) shift in the

schematic paradigm. As they say: old habits are hard to break. So the question becomes, how to

develop anew or recompose the existing schema? What follows are some devices or strategies

which Rumelhart identifies for their potential to change or adjust existing schema.

Accretion

That is the name Rumelhart applies to the accumulation of fragments or traces from events or

readings. This sounds very much like a numbers game, invoking quantity and repetition. On the

one hand this helps to explain some of the corporate culture’s basic strategies when it comes to

their commercial messages. We all know that if we hear something enough, or see it enough, then

it takes a place in our mental landscape. On the other hand, it suggests that a pro-active cultural

workers’ strategy of communications must likewise take into consideration these factors. The

numbers game will always figure prominently into any advocacy campaign.

The Trojan schema

Wilson and Anderson found that, as one might expect, “a familiar schema would speed up and

expedite the reader’s processing”(p.249). Another important finding in their research was that

what and how much is learned depended on what was culturally important to the reader. In other

words, it would appear that the likeliest ‘in’ for new schema would be via the existing (low-level)

schema already in place, something that is culturally significant to the subject. This suggests two

Page 22: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

22

things to me:

1. Do the twist: If familiar schema expedites the processing potential, then it also lends itself to

the easy subjective distortion or misinterpretation that follows such expediency. This brings us

back to that idea of missing the articles for the paper, the oversimplified and uncritical digestion

of information. And so, following this argument, it would stand to reason that a culturally

progressive message (advocacy) would fall on deaf (or at least hearing impaired) ears if it is

delivered by the corporate messenger (i.e. commercial media). This substantiates the notions of

Baudrillard and others who have pointed out the inherent malaise that is generated by the

commercial media, regardless of content.

It also identifies and supports the inherent value in culture jamming as a progressive means for

counter-cultural generation. In such, the ‘twist’ on preconditioned schema likely slows down the

processing at an encounter, forcing slower, deliberate and critical consideration. Of course this is

by no means a given, as subjects are just as likely (one would think) to resort to a ‘this is a silly

prank’ schema instead, never admitting themselves into a thoughtful deliberation at all. Perhaps

some more attention can be paid to this feature of culture jamming, ie. how to increase the

likelihood of recognition and consideration.

2. History: What better way to evolve new schema than via existing schema. And what better

way to understand the present than through history. What we have seen before, what we ‘know’

to have come before, affects us and lends to who we are, how we perceive (objectively) the world

around us and how we perceive (subjectively) our position within it. A lesson regarding union

history, for example, and how the weekend was won, is automatically meaningful to any worker

today. Whether it is met with, ‘Wow, so there was a hard-won struggle for this weekend that we

take for granted’ or ‘Oh, so that’s where the weekend came from’--either extreme suggests that

this new information has found an ‘in’, what might be the initial connector to some new schema

regarding unions, or work, or activism, for example.

This concept of delivering the history fits soundly with one of Anderson’s recommended

strategies for applying schema theory to instruction, ie. the development of the students’ relevant

background knowledge prior to any given task. History is but one feature that can be applied here,

in a sense it brings one sort of ‘literacy’ to the equation. But it is surely a powerful one, and

extremely relevant to a cultural work.

Page 23: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

23

Praxis: (See Appendix v) A little bit of history goes a long way in this poster which highlights

the hypocrisy of a government’s fanfare around an apparent increase to welfare rates.

Know your audience

Another strategy recommended by Anderson (in fact it precedes that of building a background

knowledge base) is to recognize what kind of background knowledge the students already

possess. Only then can one ascertain (with some likelihood of success) whether the necessary

schema to make connections are already in place, or whether they need to be developed.

Translated to cultural communications, the lesson here is most meaningful: An academic treatise,

for example, is not likely to go over well with blue-collar workers. The message must be

presented in a way that is meaningful to the subjects involved. Just as corporations study their

demographics so that they can position their products, so must activists position their messages,

utilizing all the modalities and all the mediums available, as best suited for the recipient, or the

desired audience. (More on modalities and mediums later, especially via London Group

multiliteracies...)

Praxis: (See Appendix vi) An example of working to suit the audience: A Student’s Guide to

Protesting is a small booklet of information and ideas particular to a targeted audience of

students. Following is a quote from it’s pages: “On campus students have the right to exercise

their constitutionally protected rights of free speech and assembly so song as they do not interfere

with the operation of the regular school program…”

Page 24: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

24

GENRISM

M.A.K. Halliday is credited for developing a framework which identifies functions or purposes

for language use. His central argument is that language is always being used for some social

purpose, and that it has evolved to cope and adapt to new situations and circumstances. Of course

his work is built on the ideas of others before him: Malinowski, who posed that language is

multifunctional, used in response to society’s demands; Firth, who posed that there was a

multiplicity of language within a total language; and Whorf, who demonstrated a relationship

between language and culture and the need for categories of language. (from Halliday’s functions

of language: A framework....)

Much of the foundation to this approach to language, often referred to as social literacy, also

refers back to James Gee, a professor of linguistics who refuted the promotion of a standard

English in American schools, on the grounds that it would present cultural conflict. He claimed

that the teaching of English is about the distribution of social goods, such as status, wealth,

power, and control. He pointed out that schools ‘socialized’ students to perform in certain ways,

depending on their intentions (for instance, public schools to produce middle-class functionaries,

or upper class schools to produce power elites).

In some opposition to Chomsky’s structural linguistic theories (i.e. that language is overtly

deterministic and predictive), Halliday applied a systemic linguistics, whereby rules are

considered to be local, temporary and situational. He suggested that we call upon a repertoire of

registers which serve various language functions, namely: instrumental, regulatory,

interactional, personal, imaginative, heuristic, and informative (see Appendix vii for a table

outlining one way that teachers have applied Halliday’s registers). These ideas served to change

the view of language from predominantly one of syntactic complexity to being more about shared

cultural meaning. It was recognized that children, for instance, could learn the mechanics of a

‘school register’ in order to become successful students. That register would contain various

genres: narrative fiction, poetry, exposition, and personal recount, for instance.

Then there are the genres of power: exposition, argument, procedure, directive, and persuasion.

These genres are utilized by those in positions of power, it is contended, in order to assert and

extend their powers. The implications of this, i.e. the identification of genres of power, is of

course of critical value to the activist movement. Perhaps more obvious are the possibilities for

deconstructing ‘power texts’ and in doing so, naming and identifying the tactics, strategies and

persuasions. Thus the potential for flagging or highlighting the way language is used, say, to sell

Page 25: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

25

products, or to sell war via the news. Much work has been done to deconstruct those genres used

by CNN to cover the war in Iraq, for example.

It follows suit that those same genres may be likewise adopted to influence power via activist

communications, and surely this has been recognized and utilized. Activist organizations and

NGO’s have long adopted power genres to their communications. But there must be some careful

consideration in how this tactic is approached. The following is quoted from Dr. Ursula Franklin,

retired university professor, writer and activist, from a speech she made at the Toronto TEN

DAYS event of February 1, 1997 (addressing the theme: “The World We Want”):

We are occupied the way the French and Norwegians were occupied, but this time by an army of marketeers..One of the things that anyone who has lived under occupation will tell you is that they refused to speak the language of the occupier. I think that is a good lesson to remember. We too should refuse to speak the language of the occupier; it is not now German or Russian but the language of the market, where they speak of “service providers” and clients, of stake holders and of the bottom line. It’s a language that reflects, as all languages do, the moral values of those who speak. One path of resistance is to refuse to communicate in the language of the occupier. Don’t talk stakeholders, about users and providers of health care, consumers of education. They are for us teachers and students, nurses, doctors and patients; they are friends, families and communities. This particular option of resistance is open to all of us and we should use it. We must analyze the language of public discourse and have to point out what those words really mean. It is amazing how much such clarification can help to build a resisting community.

Thus it is crucial, as Dr. Franklin reminds us, not to give in to the applied language of the

oppressive forces. Indeed, adopting any of modes of language may be seen as an acquiescence, of

sorts...a relinquishing of autonomous value. Here Baudrillard points out another good example of

how adopting a genre can work against counter-cultural intentions:

Page 26: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

26

The appearance of ...new social rights, brandished as slogans and emblazoned on the democratic banner of the affluent society, is in fact symptomatic, therefore, of the elements concerned acquiring the status of distinctive signs and class (or caste) privileges. The ‘right to clean air’ signifies the loss of clean air as a natural good, its transition to commodity status and its inegalitarian social redistribution. One should not mistake for objective social progress (something being entered as a right in the tables of law) what is simply the advance of the capitalist system—ie. the progressive transformation of all concrete and natural values into productive forms, i.e. into sources 1 of economic profit;2 of social privilege. (from The Consumer Society, p.58)

Page 27: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

27

Genres across Mediums

The theoretical framework of genrism translates to all mediums of text. Examples of oral genres

might include phone conversations, or stage plays, or radio interviews. Examples of written

genres might include assembly instructions, recipes, or newspaper articles. Some examples of

visual genres: watercolour portraits, road signs, product packaging...New genres are regularly

developed to meet the changing needs of society. For example, voicemail (both incoming and

outgoing) messages are themselves new and distinctive oral genres (T.D. Johnson, Complex Texts

in a Complex World, a class handout).

A correlation between genres and schemas seems inherent. It would seem that schemas relate

more closely to our incoming information processing, whereby genres relate more to forms of

expression, or outgoing textual processing. A combinative approach, i.e. borrowing from both

models to inform and facilitate the task of formulating, designing, producing and delivering

culture informing communications and educational materials. One helpful exercise might be to

chart the potentialities of communications, taking into account the various modalities (of genre,

schema, etc.) that can be considered. Following is a simple conceptual model taking into account

multiple modalities for the purpose of cultural work development, in this case the design,

function, and application of some textual communication:

1. Consider function:

instrumental, regulatory, interactional, personal, imaginative, heuristic, informative

2. Consider genre; some examples include:

narrative fiction, poetry, exposition, personal recount, stage-play, film script, sketch

comedy...

3. Consider applied genres; some examples include:

argument, directive, persuasion...(subgenres, to be applied to the general genre above)

4. Consider medium genre; some examples include:

radio, print, tv, film, multimedia...oral (transpersonal) vs. mediated...

5. Consider background schema required:

who is the communication targeted for? Union employees? Students? Teachers? The

unemployed?

Note that such a checklist as above could also be used to assist in deconstructing existing texts.

Page 28: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

28

Praxis: (See Appendix viii) Genres may be considered, for the purpose of cultural work, in terms

of the various media or modalities that any communication might take. Written text, for instance,

may take the form of buttons, postcards, or bookmarks, to name a few.

Page 29: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

29

Multiple Intelligences

If genrism provides a structural model for our external transmissions, then John Gardner’s theory

of multiple intelligences provides us with a model which identifies the variety of (inherent?)

approaches or modalities possible for those transmissions. Gardner’s premise is that every

individual comes equipped with a variety of intelligences, each one unique as to its cognitive

function or potential. In his original treatise he identified the following seven intelligences:

linguistic, logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, musical, bodily-kinaesthetic, interpersonal, and

intrapersonal (See Appendix ix which depicts a teacher’s checklist with examples of teaching

applications related to Gardner’s Intelligences). Later he added an eighth, which he cited as

naturalist. Thus a writer or Scrabble-wiz or eloquent speaker would be said to possess a

noticeable aptitude for linguistic intelligence, while a dancer or a hockey player would have a

greater bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence. We are all biased toward some intelligences, it would

seem, and weaker in others. Recognition of these distinctions can help us to understand different

approaches to learning, as well as providing perhaps some due recognition for those intelligences

which are culturally less valued (for whatever reason).

Apparently Gardner admits that education was not a consideration when he conceptualized his

model. But his ideas have found great attention in that very arena, with educators scrambling to

incorporate the model of multiple intelligences into their curriculums, and he has since been in

high demand to represent his model to their ends. Thus he has suggested what would seem to be

the obvious; to teach to the strengths of the learners. In other words, if the learner is more

spatially oriented than linguistically so, she might be encouraged to visualize a concept, or work

with video, for example, instead of being dedicated to a written report. He takes this idea one step

further, and puts forth a model of “curriculum brokers” whose task it would be to negotiate a

good match between learner and curriculum, applying the prerequisite intelligences.

This seems to harken back to the ‘know your audience’ notion of Anderson (noted above). But

instead of background experience and likely schema, with Gardner’s model it’s all about

ascertaining which of the intelligences will be called upon to facilitate successful learning. The

potential for translating this model to suit cultural work becomes obvious: Let’s say the effort is

targeted toward the education and organization of unions for solidarity. Adopting Gardner’s

model, we might consider that the language and methodologies used to communicate with, say,

teachers, would be likely different than the most effective choices for communication with, say,

machinists. Of course these are generalizations, but it is also reasonable to expect some likelihood

Page 30: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

30

of such disparity. Thus, the models and analogies and even the actual methodologies used, in fact

the entire ‘curriculum’, could take into consideration these variances. Generally speaking,

Gardner’s theories suggest that cultural workers must consider adopting a variety of intelligence

orientations to increase the likelihood of ‘speaking’ to the variety in the audience they approach.

Praxis: Appendix x shows a program designed to accompany a musical theatre production that

deals with the subject of genetically modified foods. Such a production is bound to attract

audience members who are not likely to attend other, more typical venues for the education about

or consideration of such a subject.

Page 31: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

31

Louise Rosenblatt and Reader Response

Based on a methodology of eliciting student responses to literary works, Louise Rosenblatt

developed a constructivist theory of reader response (beginning in 1938), suggesting that with

every foray into a text the reader interacts with and interprets that text anew. She argued thus that

the reader in fact constructs the text (in the act of interpreting it) and as such the text and reader

are “aspects of the same transaction”:

The reader’s main purpose is to participate as fully as possible in the potentialities of the text. But much of the interest and vitality and texture of the total literary experience arises from the intensely personal activity of thought and feeling with which the literary transaction is impregnated and surrounded. And the matrix of this is, of course, the personality and the world of the individual reader. (Rosenblatt, The reader, the text, the poem, 1978, p.69)

While Rosenblatt would not necessarily be considered an exponent of ‘critical literacy’, the above

quote exemplifies her dedication to personal experience in a way which is reminiscent of Paulo

Friere’s revolutionary contention that it must be the educators aim to assist the learner in

discovering their own subjective value, their own position and potential to interpret and to act and

to have an effect on their reality:

Problem-posing education, as a humanist and liberating praxis, posits as fundamental that men subjected to domination must fight for their emancipation. To that end, it enables teachers and students to become Subjects of the educational process by overcoming authoritarianism and an alienating intellectualism; it also enables men to overcome their false perception of reality. The world—no longer something to be described with deceptive words—becomes the object of that transforming action by men which results in their humanization. (Friere, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, p. 74)

Rosenblatt made a clear distinction between two prevailing kinds of text, each requiring selective

modes of attention: efferent, which was a text read for information, and aesthetic, which was a

text read for ‘lived experience’. She posited that much of a learner’s reading practice was

approached from an efferent stance, and deplored the fact that school curriculums resorted to

efferent readings of poetry. She encouraged instead an aesthetic stance to a text, contending that it

was through such a transaction with the text that real learning took place, i.e. with the potential to

adjust one’s cultural horizons, in a social context. The transaction she spoke of was a reciprical

Page 32: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

32

one, wherein the text shapes response simultaneously as the reader shapes the text. It is through

this critical process, this praxis, that the learning occurs. Applied exercises, such as facilitating a

reader’s examination of stock (or conditioned) responses to a text, would assist in developing and

evoking “strands of awareness” (Rosenblatt, 1978, p.154)

Rosenblatt’s contributions, via her theories of reader response, provide for powerful potentialities

in terms of application toward cultural work. In highlighting the distinction between efferent and

aesthetic texts she noted a profound distinction in the ability of one (aesthetic) over the other

(efferent) to yield an emotional fulfillment with inherent socially transformative effects. Is it any

wonder that so much of the texts consumed today, with their commercial intentions, are efferent

in their nature or, if aesthetic, can be critically exposed for their intention, i.e. to elicit stock or

conditioned response?

Likewise, in an examination of the current use of texts for cultural action, one’s likely to discover

a commitment to efferent stances. Why? Likely because cultural activists have (unfortunately)

adopted the language of the oppressor (i.e. the marketplace), with its reliance on facts, figures,

and qualitative information. Rosenblatt’s insights would suggest that, if the goal is to evoke

change (or initiate praxis) in the reader, then an aesthetic approach would be the likely form for

success. In adopting an aesthetic stance with the text, the reader then replaces social vision for

conditioned response:

Since we interpret the book or poem in terms of our fund of past experiences, it is equally possible and necessary that we come to reinterpret our old sense of things in the light of this new literary experience, in the light of the new ways of thinking and feeling offered by the work of art. Only when this happens has there been a full interplay between book and reader, and hence a complete and rewarding literary experience. (Rosenblatt, 1938, Literature as exploration, p. 126)

Of course, the “work of art”, for the purpose of cultural action, need not be a poem or an art

exhibit (although it certainly might be). It could also take the form of a poster, or a pamphlet, or a

lecture, or a video. Whatever the medium, an aesthetic stance to the delivery (thus evoking an

aesthetic reading) can call the reader into participation with the text, promoting the possibility for

cognitive and, further, cultural change.

Praxis: (See Appendix xi;a) Seeking ways to transform cultural meaning from efferent to

aesthetic form is an ongoing challenge for any artist and cultural worker. Ruben Anderson’s

“Partial Portraits” (as printed in Front Magazine, Volume IX, no. 5, May/June 1998) works to

lend new aesthetic and artistic value to politically, historically, and culturally significant figures.

Page 33: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

33

Appendix xi;b shows another popular and effective aesthetic form: the comic.

Page 34: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

34

Verbo-Visual Literacy: (Steve Moline and others)

Simply put, historians and educators should consider mounting a visual literacy campaign of the

magnitude and energy of the early common school reformers. Historians and teachers working

with visual images, especially photographs, television and film, need to alert students to the

inherent biases of these formats. Students will be willing partners in the endeavor, for they seem

more willing and capable of critiquing film and tape than they are of printed text. In that way,

they can test the truth of Oliver Wendell Holmes’s definition of the photograph as an illusion with

the “appearance of reality that cheats the senses with its seeming truth”.

(Peter Knupfer, from Text to Television: Hermeneutic Textualism and the Challenge of Visual

Technology in the Teaching of History, in Verbo-Visual Literacy: Understanding and applying

New Educational Communication Media Technologies, p. 155.)

What is really needed is education of the consumer in visual literacy and media literacy. We can use the media to teach about the media. We can use the media or let the media use us. One of the tasks for the 21st century in the area of Visual Literacy is to teach people about Image manipulation. (Ronald Sutton, Image Manipulation: Then and Now, from Verbo-Visual Literacy, p. 189)

Verbo-Visual literacy recognizes the importance of visual information, both as a vehicle for

conveying language, and for its powerful ability to convey coded information, information that is

difficult (often meaningfully and intentionally) to decode and thereby potentially manipulative.

This literacy therefore presents combinative options for cultural communication, namely 1. to use

graphic or visual information to enhance or add meaning to verbal communication, and 2. to learn

a visual literacy with which one may critically deconstruct visual information, to make better

sense of the communication.

Thus cultural workers may use these concepts in a number of ways. For one example, visual

deconstruction of texts may be applied to critique, learn and teach the implications of the

manipulative potential inherent to visual forms. Augmentation and deconstruction skills may thus

be developed. And the advantages of thoughtful application of visuals to enhance other texts (oral

or written) is of course invaluable. Not only does this work to enhance the aesthetics of the text

(think Rosenblatt) but it also increases the visibility of a text, and can transmit meaning more

directly to those more visually inclined (think Gardner’s intelligences).

Praxis: (See Appendix xii) A picture (from the WTO protest in Seattle, November 1999) speaks

Page 35: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

35

a thousand words. (Photograph taken by author.)

Page 36: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

36

Complexity Theory

Complexity theory, based on a theory of complex dynamical systems, can radically alter one’s

perception of reality. It has emerged from the disciplines of mathematics and physics, but is now

lending itself to other cognitive systems. Most systems, it would appear, are not linear but

complex in their nature. Complex systems are typically:

- fractal like - sensitive to initial conditions - dynamical - recursive - iterative - prone to emergence - demonstrative of chaotic behaviour - self-organizing

Suffice to say the details and empirical study behind complexity theory are, well, complex. That

said, we are all very familiar with complex systems. One of the crucial points to derive from this

theory, for our purposes here, is the realization that most organic systems are complex in nature,

and that they contain patterns (of recursion, iteration, etc.) which, holistically observed, create or

follow a remarkably common model of a hierarchical, nested nature.

The application to learning is summed up nicely by Dr. Terry Johnson (in Complexity, Brains and

Learning, a professor’s handout):

If the brain is complex then the mind is complex. If the mind is complex then learning is complex. If learning is complex then curriculum and instruction must be based on a true understanding of the nature of the brain and the manner in which it learns.

Johnson’s Recursive-Iterative Model of Instruction applies complexity theory to a learning

curriculum. The premise is (see illustration) that a learner makes recursive (always coming back)

and iterative (repetitive) engagements with a text, with each recursion a varied engagement, thus

becoming more and more familiar with the material, via a variety of approaches. This ultimately

takes the learner to a place where he or she may achieve mastery by independent application (see

Appendix xiii).

This model can encompass so many of the other models for teaching and learning previously

cited. Thus it can work ideally as an apparatus, of sorts, or an applied methodology for the

Page 37: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

37

purpose of communication of any text, in any form. Best of all, it accounts for the complexity of

the learner, making possible a plurality approach to comprehension and learning.

Indeed it is such an approach to learning that was presented recently (at a conference in 1995) by

members of the so-called New London Group, in a discussion of the Future of Literacy

Pedagogy.

Page 38: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

38

A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures

If it is possible to generalise about the mission of education, it is to ensure that all students benefit from learning in ways that allow them to participate fully in public, community and economic life. Literacy pedagogy is expected to play a particularly important role in fulfilling this mission. (from A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing social futures, by Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis with members of the New London Group, 1995)

Indicative of the complex nature of their proposed pedagogy, I quote additionally the following:

The more autonomous lifeworlds become, the more movement there can be: people entering and leaving, whole lifeworlds going through major transitions, more open and productive negotiation of internal differences, freer external linkage and alliances. (p. 28)

In their paper The Group asserts that the role of literacy pedagogy is “to develop an epistemology

of pluralism which provides access without people having to erase or leave behind different

subjectivities”. This proposal relates closely to Friere’s intentions for literacy as related earlier.

Furthermore, they apply a notion of Designing to their pedagogy, which acknowledges the

complex assertion of complexity (and that of Rosenblatt and others) while contending that “every

moment of meaning involves the transformation of the available resources of meaning. Reading,

seeing and listening are all instances of Designing”. As such, they contend that meaning makers

constantly remake themselves, reconstructing and renegotiating their identities.

The Group sets out to develop a ‘metalanguage’ that describes meaning in different realms,

including the textual and the visual, while taking into account the multimodal relations so

prevalent in today’s media texts. They suggest that this metalanguage include the key terms

(based on earlier models) of ‘genres’ and ‘discourses’, plus the additional subcategories such as

‘voices’, ‘styles’, and ‘narratives’. They further identify six major areas in which functional

‘grammars’ (defined as the metalanguages which describe and explain patterns) are required:

Linguistic design, Visual design, Audio design, Gestural design, Spatial Design and Multimodal

Design (see Appendix xiv).

Such a multiliteral approach to pedagogy could clearly serve the interests of a pedagogy for

cultural work. By naming the parts and modalities, and with a vision of subjective pluralism, it

Page 39: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

39

would appear that efforts of educational theorists like those of the New London Group (Courtney

Cazden, Bill Cope, Norman Fairclough, James Gee, Mary Kalantzis, Gunther Kress, Allan Luke,

Carmen Luke, Sarah Michaels, and Martin Nakata) could provide the foundational groundwork

for developments towards a specialized understanding of the design and function of

communication for cultural action. Indeed, much of their language and ideas, especially as relates

to the forementioned concept of ‘designing’, might transfer literally (and possibly ideally) to a

‘design’ for cultural work:

Two key concepts help us describe multimodal meanings and the relationships of different designs of meaning…The term ‘hybridity’ highlights the mechanisms of creativity and of culture-as-process particularly salient in contemporary society. People create and innovate by hybridising—articulating in new ways—established practices and conventions within and between different modes of meaning. This includes the hybridisation of established ways modes of meaning (of discourses and genres), and multifarious combinations of modes of meaning cutting across boundaries of convention and creating new conventions. ‘Intertextuality’ draws attention to the potentially complex ways in which meaning (such as linguistic meanings) are constituted through relationships to other texts (real or imaginary), text types (discourse, genres, narratives, and so on) and other modes of meaning (such as visual design, architectonic or geographical positioning). Any text can be viewed historically in terms of the intertextual chains (historical series of texts) it draws upon, and in terms of the transformations it works upon them. (p. 35)

Further, the Group proposes four components of pedagogy which may be applied (see Appendix

xv). Especially of interest is the Critical Framing component:

The goal of Critical Framing is to help learners frame their growing mastery in practice (from Situated Practice) and conscious control and understanding (from Overt Instruction) in relation to the historical, social, cultural, political, ideological, and value-centred relations of particular systems of knowledge and social practice. (p. 38)

And finally, like a bow to Friere’s notion of praxis, the Group’s fourth component of pedagogy,

Transformed Practice:

Page 40: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

40

It is not enough to be able to articulate one’s understanding of intra-systematic relations or ‘critique’ extra-systematic relations. We need always to return to where we began, to Situated Practice, but now a re-practice, where ‘theory’ becomes ‘reflective practice’. Teachers need to develop, with their students, ways in which their students can demonstrate how they can design and carry out, in a reflective manner, new practices embedded in their own goals and values. (p. 38)

Praxis: The latest developments in cultural work seem to exemplify contemporary developments

in educational theory such as those of the Group outlined above, especially with regards to

multiliteral approaches to pedagogy. Appendix xvi;(a and b) are copies of posters promoting

events which are often referred to as convergences, as they bring together people for larger events

which feature a multiplicity of opportunities for learning, practice, involvement, exchange, and

action.

I suggest that the work of the Group and other educational theorists, as summarized above,

strongly supports my main assertion of this Section, namely that the work of this discipline has

been and continues to inform a potential pedagogy for cultural work. More generally, the

theories lend themselves, invaluably, toward furthering the development and potential of critical

media literacy education.

Page 41: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

41

In Conclusion

I hope I’ve satisfied the intentions set out for this paper. To revisit:

1. to highlight the need for and value of critical media literacy education, especially in a time when capitalist (read corporate) interests prevail and dominate the media landscape and our culture.

In her article (previously cited) relating to corporate ownership of media, Gail Lem succinctly

sums up the threat that is posed against our culture and society:

The problem with letting the corporate agenda invade our language is that the words we use inform the way we think. With time, we will begin to believe that the human cost of the corporate agenda—and the cost to our society, and our country—can be sacrificed on the altar of corporate profits. (p.10, Canadian Perspectives, Summer 1997)

Critical media literacy (and the education thereof) provides citizens with the skills necessary to recognize how the media is complicit in this corporate invasion, and how to identify the implications.

2. to propose, by way of contribution, the development of a pedagogy for those who will develop and share such skills, they who I will refer to as cultural workers.

I have made a case in these pages for cultural workers, those who by choice or compulsion make

it their work (full or part time) to apply critical media literacy skills toward their efforts to inform

citizens and, ultimately, the culture. Teachers and artists, tradespeople and laypeople, everyone

has something to contribute to the effort. Ideally, every modality and medium would be utilized,

every potential audience targeted. Due to the overwhelming bias of mainstream media and

corporate-driven education we experience today, more workers are essential, and better

organization of such work should be a priority. Development of a pedagogy for cultural work

would help to legitimize the work and to ensure its perpetuity and development and expansion.

As for my cursory contribution from a field of educational theorists, I readily admit to just

skimming the surface of the existing potential for assembling a pedagogy. Other obvious

territories to mine would include communication theory, history, anthropology, linguistics...and

Page 42: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

42

of course there is no limit to the depth of study that any one of those or other disciplines might

provide. As suggested, a multiliteral background would best inform the potential for cultural

work.

3. to re-assert (what many others have said before me) that cultural groundwork is an essential intermediary stage toward societal change or revolution.

“Before the machine can be understood, one must first be able to see it,” writes William Greider

in the beginning of his exploration of global capitalism entitled, One World, Ready or Not (p. 12).

Cultural work means to expose that machine, for what it really is, for all to see. The more citizens

that see it, it follows, the more support there will be for the future potential of change on a socio-

economic and political nature.

4. to emphasize the need for the increased development and organization of independent media operators, centres, and networks to support the development, production, and distribution of such work.

I touched only briefly on this point, as I feel ultimately that to do this theme justice would require

another paper altogether. It is key to my arguments put forth, however, and so in summary I will

add the following:

As was touched on earlier in this paper, the potential to effect cultural change through mainstream

media channels would appear to be extremely limited, at best. Not to say it is a wholly fruitless

endeavour to plug the mainstream with as much cultural work as possible, mind you. In the end,

in keeping with the multiliteral pedagogical approach, every little bit helps. But I suggest that the

real potential for large scale cultural information will take advantage of independent media

opportunities.

Recent revolutions in technology have made for new potentialities in terms of independent media

production and distribution. It is especially a critical time for the negotiation of democratic

access to the resources and ‘bandwidth’ space of the new digital media (namely, in its current

form, the internet). If this challenge is met successfully (and the internet bandwidth isn’t co-opted

by corporate interests the way all other mainstream media potential has gone in the past) then in

all likelihood cultural workers may find themselves in a frontline ‘broadcasting’ situation,

creating the programming and content for independent digital broadcast ‘stations’ and networks

of the near future. Given such a scenario, one can only imagine the potential for the promotion of

Page 43: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

43

critical media literacy and cultural work.

We must strike while the iron is hot. Now is the time to collect the resources, to assemble the

media centres, to organize and shape the networks. As Don Hazen points out in his article,

Imagining a Democratic Media (as printed in We the Media), the momentum is already well

under way:

In the spring of 1996, for example, the Institute for Alternative Journalism hosted the first-ever Media and Democracy Congress. The congress brought together more than 700 media activists, critics, working journalists, and editors representing print, electronic, and online outlets Many participants saw what they have in common despite their different issue areas or mediums...They agreed to share resources and to collaborate in the future. The congress alas developed an Information Bill of Rights for organizers to use as a foundation for moving forward. (p. 200)

We have now the window of opportunity to resist and refute attempts by corporate interests to

control the digital bandwidths and likewise to promote the democratic potential for this space, as

well as other media, in the interests of the public good.

Page 44: Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

Darren G. Alexander Toward a Pedagogy for Critical Media Literacy

44

Acknowledgements

I’d like first of all to thank Dr. Laurie Baxter, my academic supervisor in the Faculty of

Education at the University of Victoria, without whose ideas, intellectual prodding, support and

patience this project would not have been possible.

Heartful thanks and appreciation are also due Dr. Geoffrey Potter, who as Chair of the Dept. of

Communications and Social Foundations at UVic provided me with some of my first up-close

models of contemporary education theory.

And to Dr. Terry Johnson, also on the faculty in Education, whose inspirational class turned me

on to the wondrous connections that were possible between the theories of contemporary

educational theorists and a pedagogy for cultural work, and for providing me with so much of the

source material for Section II of this paper.

Lastly, I ride humbly on the coattails of all those scholars who have come before me and I hope

I’ve not offended anyone by meddling with their ideas and coming up with my own conclusions.

Sincerely,

Darren Alexander