• Towards an interaction evaluation between dimensions and objectives of sustainable development at territorial levels

• “Future Job, BetterLife”

• Task “Combination-harmony”

(pillar combination)= (economics, social, environment)(pillar interconnections) = (viable, vivable, equitable), (viable, liveable, social justice)

Equitable

LiveableViable

Economical Social

Environmental

Sustainability trade-off

InterPillar convergence

interaction trade-off formulation

Ecosphère + Géosphère + Sociosphère field forces

Equitable

Géosphère

Sociosphère

LiveableViableEcosphère

Econogical weight

Ecosocial weight

Socioecological weight

Equilibrium indexing

SD convergence global indicator = distance to exact barycenter

From economics to environment : the « econology » pillar combination

From expansionist (neo-classical economics) to « econological » paradigm (Rees 2003)

Econogical indexing

Linear in- & out-put of low entropy energy and matter sustains economy and drives the linear flows to exchange value, so that economic activity is « contained by the ecosphere, providing resources and assimilating wastes (Rees 2003)

From economics to social: the « social capital » ecosocial combination. (equitable/social justice)

Relationship Between Bridging Social Capital and Governance Source: Narayan (1999)

Ecosocial indexing

Social Capital and Poverty Transitions

Source: Woolcock (1999b)

Transformational leaderships(Folke & al. 2005)

Squaring the circle: social behaviour for environmental goals (liveable)

Theory of reasoned action (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980)

Socioecological indexing

Barriers between environmental concern and action (Blake, 1999) .

Models of predictors of environmental behavior (Hines et al., 1986).

Low-cost high-cost model of pro-environmental behavior (Diekmann & Preisendoerfer, 1992) Zipf-Pareto-Mandelbrot law

Carl Folke, Thomas Hahn, Per Olsson, and Jon Norberg ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMSAnnu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005. 30:441–73

Woolcock, Michael. 1999b. “Managing Risk, Shocks, and Opportunities in Developing Economies: The Role of Social Capital”, in Gustav Ranis (ed.) Dimensions of Development New Haven: Yale Center for International and Area Studies

Narayan, Deepa. 1999. “Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty” Washington, DC: The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2167

Blake, J. (1999) Overcoming the ‘value–action gap’ in environment al policy: tensions between national policy and local experience, Local Environment, 4 (3), pp. 257, 278

Rees W. E . (2003) Economic Development and Environmental Protection : an Ecological Economics perspective, in : Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 86 : 29-45, Kluwer Academic Pub. Netherlands

Diekmann, A. & Preisendoerfer , P. (1992) Persoenliches Umweltverhalt en: Die Diskrepanz zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44, pp. 226–251

Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986–87) . Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analysis, The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2) , pp. 1–8

Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J., (2002) Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?, Environmental Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.239, 260