towards trust management system for resource scheduling in cloud computing

www.ijsret.org

1International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 – 0882,Volume 3 Issue 1, April 2014

TOWARDS TRUST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR RESOURCESCHEDULING IN CLOUD COMPUTING

M. KaladeviPG Scholar

Dept. of Computer Science and EngineeringP.S.R. Rengasamy College of Engineering for Women,

Sivakasi-626 140

P. ThiruselvanAssistant Professor

Dept of Computer Science and EngineeringP.S.R. Rengasamy College of Engineering for Women,

Sivakasi-626 140

ABSTRACTThe allocation of cloud virtual machines at physicalresources is a key requirement for the success ofclouds. A trustworthy person is someone in whom youcan place your trust and rest assured that the trust shallnot be betrayed. A variety of different types ofcomputing concepts that involves a large number ofcomputers that are connected through a real-timecommunication network. Cloud schedulers do notconsider the entire cloud infrastructure neither do theyconsider the overall user and infrastructure properties.Virtual resources are hosted using physical resourcesthat match their requirements without getting usersinvolved with understanding the details of the cloudinfrastructure. The provided prototype implements theproposed cloud scheduler. The trustworthy schedulercomponent, it is important to have an understanding ofhow clouds are managed. The scheduler withtrustworthy input about the trust status of the cloudinfrastructure and it establishes the foundations ofplanned future work to cover other properties. Cloudtrust management which provides the scheduler withinput about the trust status of the cloud infrastructure.

General TermsCloudsim, Datacenter, Datacenter Broker, VirtualMachine, Cloudlet

KeywordsChain of Trust, Scheduling, Trust Management,Resource Allocation, Trusted Computing

1. INTRODUCTIONCloud describes the use of a collection of services,applications, information, and infrastructure comprisedof pools of compute, network, information and storageresources. These components can be rapidlyorchestrated, provisioned, implemented anddecommissioned, and scaled up or down providing foran on-demand utility-like model of allocations andconsumption.

Cloud computing is a large-scale distributedcomputing paradigm that is driven by economies ofscale, in which a pool of abstracted, virtualized,dynamically scalable, managed computing power,storage, platforms, and services are delivered ondemand to external customers over the Internet.Features of Clouds Scalable, Enhanced quality ofservice, specalized and Customized, Cost Effective,Simplified user interface.

CloudSim goal is to provide a generalized andextensible simulation framework that enablesmodeling, simulation, and experimentation ofemerging Cloud computing infrastructures andapplication services, allowing its users to focus onspecific system design issues that they want toinvestigate, without getting concerned about the lowlevel details related to Cloud-based infrastructures andservices.

At the provider side, simulation environmentsallow evaluation of different kinds of resource leasingscenarios under varying load and pricing distributions.Such studies could aid the providers in optimizing theresource access cost with focus on improving profits.In the absence of such simulation platforms, Cloudcustomers and providers have to rely either ontheoretical and imprecise evaluations, or on try-and-error approaches that lead to inefficient serviceperformance and revenue generation.

The main advantage of using CloudSim forinitial performance testing include: (i) timeeffectiveness: it requires very less effort and time toimplement Cloud-based application provisioning testenvironment and (ii) flexibilityandapplicability:developers can model and test the performance of theirapplication services in heterogeneous Cloudenvironments (Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure) withlittle programming and deployment effort.

CloudSim offers the following novel features:(i) support for modeling and simulation of large scaleCloud computing environments, including datacenters, on a single physical computing node; (ii) aself-contained platform for modeling Clouds, service

www.ijsret.org


brokers, provisioning, and allocations policies; (iii)support for simulation of network connections amongthe simulated system elements; and (iv) facility forsimulation of federated Cloud environment that inter-networks resources from both private and publicdomains, a feature critical for research studies relatedto Cloud-Bursts and automatic application scaling.Some of the unique features of CloudSim are: (i)availability of a virtualization engine that aids increation and management of multiple, independent,and co-hosted virtualized services on a data centernode; and (ii) flexibility to switch between space-shared and time-shared allocation of processing coresto virtualized services.The applications that may benefit from theaforementioned federated Cloud computinginfrastructure include social networks such asFacebook and MySpace, and Content DeliveryNetworks (CDNs). Social networking sites servedynamic contents to millions of users, whose accessand interaction patterns are difficult to predict. Ingeneral, social networking web-sites are built usingmulti-tiered web applications such as WebSphere andpersistency layers like the MySQL relational database.Usually, each component will run in a different virtualmachine, which can be hosted in data centers ownedby different Cloud computing providers. Additionally,each plug-in developer has the freedom to choosewhich Cloud computing provider offers the servicesthat are more suitable to run his/her plug-in. As aconsequence, a typical social networking webapplication is formed by hundreds of differentservices, which may be hosted by dozens of Cloud-oriented data centers around the world. Wheneverthere is a variation in temporal and spatial locality ofworkload (usage pattern), each application componentmust dynamically scale to offer good quality ofexperience to users.Figure 1 shows the layered implementation of theCloudSim software framework and architecturalcomponents. At the lowest layer is the SimJavadiscrete event simulation engine that implements thecore functionalities required for higher-levelsimulation frameworks such as queuing and processingof events, creation of system components ,communication between components, andmanagement of the simulation clock.

The latest emergence of Cloud computing is asignificant step towards realizing this utility computingmodel since it is heavily driven by industry vendors.Cloud computing promises to deliver reliable servicesthrough next-generation data centers built onvirtualized compute and storage technologies. Userswill be able to access applications and data from a“Cloud” anywhere in the world on demand and paybased on what they use.

Fig1. Cloudsim Framework

Many high-performance computing (HPC) andscientific workloads (i.e., the set of computations to becompleted) in cloud environment, such as those inbioinformatics, biomedical informatics,cheminformatics and geoinformatics, are complexworkflows of individual jobs. The workflow is usuallyorganized as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), in whichthe constituent jobs (i.e., nodes) are either control ordata dependent.

Design and Implementation of Cloudsim1.1. Datacenter

This class models the core infrastructure levelservices (hardware, software) offered by resourceproviders in a Cloud computing environment. Itencapsulates a set of compute hosts (blade servers) thatcan be either homogeneous or heterogeneous asregards to their resource configurations (memory,cores, capacity, and storage). Furthermore, everyDatacenter component instantiates a generalizedresource provisioning component that implements a setof policies for allocating bandwidth, memory, andstorage devices.1.2. Datacenter Broker

User code

Simulation

Specification

Scheduling Policy

Cloud Scenario

User Requirements

User or Datacenter Broker

CloudSim

User Interface

Structures

Virtual Machine

Services

Cloud Services

Cloud Resources

Virtual Machine

VM Management

VMGridlet Execution

BandwidthAllocation

VM Provisioning

Datacenter

Host

VMGridlet

Simjava

Discrete event simulation

SimulationEntities

Event handling

www.ijsret.org


This class models a broker, which isresponsible for mediating between users and serviceproviders depending on users’ QoS requirements anddeploys service tasks across Clouds. The broker actingon behalf of users identifies suitable Cloud serviceproviders through the Cloud Information Service (CIS)and negotiates with them for an allocation of resourcesthat meets QoS needs of users. The researchers andsystem developers must extend this class forconducting experiments with their custom developedapplication placement policies.1.3. Cloudlet

This class models the Cloud-based applicationservices (content delivery, social networking, businessworkflow), which are commonly deployed in the datacenters. CloudSim represents the complexity of anapplication in terms of its computational requirements.Every application component has a pre-assignedinstruction length (inherited from GridSim’sGridletcomponent) and amount of data transfer (both pre andpost fetches) that needs to be undertaken forsuccessfully hosting the application.1.4. Virtual Machine

A virtual machine is a softwareimplementation of a computing environment in whichan operating system or program can be installed andrun. Virtual machines are created within avirtualization layer, such as hypervisor orvirtualization platform runs on top of client or serveroperating system. It runs inside a host, sharing host listwith other VMs. It processes cloudlets.This processing happens according to a policy, definedby the Cloudlet Scheduler. Each VM has a owner,which can submit cloudlets to the VM to be executed.

2. RELATED WORKIn these work lot of techniques implemented

through the scheduling and trustworthiness of cloudcomputation framework. M. Abbadi [2] proposesservice of middleware at cloud virtual layer a layerrepresents Cloud’s resources that share commoncharacteristics. Layering concept helps inunderstanding the relations and interactions amongstCloud resources. A Horizontal Layer to be the parentof physical, virtual or application layers. EachHorizontal Layer contains Domains. A Domainrepresents related resources which enforce a Domaindefined policy. Domains at physical layer are related toCloud infrastructure and, therefore, are associated withinfrastructure properties and policies. Domains atvirtual and application layers are Cloud user specificand therefore are associated with Cloud userproperties. Moving current Cloud infrastructure to thepotential trustworthy Internet scale Cloud criticalinfrastructure requires a set of trustworthy middleware.Middleware glues resources member in Cloud layers

together by providing a set of automated self-managedservices that consider users security and privacyrequirements by design. These services should betransparent to Cloud users and should require minimalhuman intervention. The implementation of self-managed services’ functions in middleware wouldmainly depend on the middleware location withinCloud’s layers.

Virtualization technology is becomingincreasingly common in datacenters, since it allows forcollocation of multiple workloads, consisting ofoperating systems, middleware and applications, indifferent virtual machines (VMs) on shared physicalhardware platforms. However, when coupled with theease of VM migration, this trend increases thepotential surface for security attacks. It presents theIBM Trusted Virtual Datacenter (TVDc) technologydeveloped to address the need for strong isolation andintegrity guarantees. We present and discuss variouscomponents that constitute TVDc: the TrustedPlatform Module (TPM), the virtual TPM, the IBMhypervisor security architecture (sHype) and theassociated systems management software.Virtualization technology is used increasingly indatacenters, both for commodity and high-end servers.Among the primary drivers for this trend is the abilityto aggregate multiple workloads to run on the same setof physical resources, thus resulting in increased serverutilization and reduced space and power consumption.TVD concept in a scenario where the owner of aphysical data center offers the operation ofindependent virtual datacenters (VDCs) to severalcustomers.Access to a host system is limited to theguest VMs currently running on it.

I. M. Abbadi and N. Cornelius [6] proposechallenges of research and agenda in dynamics of trustin cloud A Cloud provider can assess its ownresources’ trust worthiness, which enables the Cloud torealize its trust level; and when Cloud providerscollaborate then they can define certain levels of trustfor resources involved in the collaboration. Theassessment of the level of trust in automated self-managed services is one of the key factors which helpsassessing Cloud provider operational trustworthiness.The Cloud and some of the emerging technologies thatcould be used to establish trust in the Cloud includingenabling more jurisdiction over the consumers’ datathrough provision of remote access control,transparency in the security capabilities of theproviders, independent certification of Cloud servicesfor security properties and capabilities and the use ofprivate enclaves. The loss of control on assets,regulatory disparities between geographic locationswhere the physical infra structure may reside, securityand lack of visibility into the security mechanisms

www.ijsret.org


employed, and certification and compliance tostandards.

J. Lyle and A. Martin[16] propose feasibilityof remote attestation of web service Integrity reportingis the core mechanism proposed by the TrustedComputing Group (TCG) for establishing trust in acomputing platform. The vast number of availableapplications, operating systems and hardware driversmean that any list of trustworthy software andhardware will need to be unmanageably large. The fewrealistic methods for establishing if any oneconfiguration is trustworthy. These problems spelldisaster for trusted computing, and may causeresearchers and developers to dismiss the functionalityprovided.

The little effort has been spent within thetrusted computing community to support or refutethese criticisms. While the general arguments aredifficult to deny, an assessment of their validity indifferent contexts is missing. The supposed wide rangeof configurations may not existing embedded systems.Owner can reliably find out exactly what software andhardware is in use, they should be able to recogniseand eliminate any malware, viruses and trojans. Agreat deal of infrastructure is required to make his ideapractical, including new hardware, modifications toapplications and databases of known, trustworthyplatform configurations.

Bootstrapping of trust in commoditycomputers provide proposal of P. Bryan, M. M.Jonathan, and P. Adrian[18] The businesses andindividuals entrust progressively greater amounts ofsecurity sensitive data to computer platforms , itbecomes increasingly import ant to inform themwhether their trust is warranted. While the design andvalidation of secure software is an interesting study inits own right , we focus this survey on how trust can bebootstrapped in commodity computers specifically byconveying information about a computer ’s currentexecution environment to an interested party.

As businesses and individual sent rustprogressively greater amounts of security- sensitivedata to computer platforms, it becomes increasinglyimportant to inform them whether their trust iswarranted. While the design and validation of securessoftware is an interesting study in its own right, wefocus this survey on how trust can be bootstrapped incommodity computers , specifically by conveyinginformation about a computers current executionenvironment to an interested party.

K. M. Khan and Q. M. Malluhi [12] proposeestablishing trust in cloud computing The emergingtechnologies that can help address the challenges oftrust in cloud computing. Cloud computing providesmany opportunities for enterprises by offering a rangeof computing services. The competitive environment,

the service dynamism, elasticity, and choices offeredby this highly scalable technology are too attractive forenterprises to ignore. Contractual relationships areoften used to establish trust. In a typical businessenvironment, an organization is compensated if theservice isn’t delivered as expected.

Cloud providers similarly use service-levelagreements (SLAs) to boost consumers’ trust.Unfortunately, these might not help in cloudcomputing. Trust in cloud computing is related more topreventing a trust violation than to guaranteeingcompensation should a violation occur.

3. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

Fig 2: System Design

Fig2 provide cloud environment consist of enormoususer requirement and infrastructure properties. Userrequirements are both hardware and softwarerequirement. Infrastructure properties are availability,reliability, security, privacy concern.User enter thecloud environment made a chain of trust consist ofusername, password, and provide some unique id toenter the cloud. Scheduling perform how to commitresource between possible task. Trust management isimplementing information security, specifically accesscontrol policies. Resource allocation specifies thevirtual machine managed through the cloudlet lengthof resource management.

4. PROPOSED WORK4.1. Create Cloud Environment

A simulation toolkit enables modeling andsimulation of Cloud computing systems andapplication provisioning environments. The CloudSimtoolkit supports both system and behavior modeling of

Userrequirement

Chain of trust

Trusted Un trusted

Scheduling

Queuing

VM creation

Trustmanagement

Cloud security

Resource allocation

www.ijsret.org


Cloud system components such as data centers, virtualmachines (VMs) and resource provisioning policies. Itimplements generic application provisioningtechniques that can be extended with ease and limitedeffort. Currently, it supports modeling and simulationof Cloud computing environments consisting of bothsingle and inter-networked clouds (federation ofclouds). Moreover, it exposes custom interfaces forimplementing policies and provisioning techniques forallocation of VMs under inter-networked Cloudcomputing scenarios.

In this module we are creating cloud users anddatacenters and cloud virtual machines as per ourrequirement. Job manager, Cloud controller alsocreated. The Job Manager receives the client’s jobs, isresponsible for scheduling them, and coordinates theirexecution. It is capable of communicating with theinterface the cloud operator provides to control theinstantiation of VMs. We call this interface the CloudController. By means of the Cloud Controller the JobManager can allocate or deallocate VMs according tothe current job execution phase.

According to our objective of this project weneed to analyze the performance and Trusted User. Forthat first creating a cloud environment with the help ofVM -Ware. In creating the cloud environment byimplementing the Datacenter, Data broker, VM. VMdenotes the number of available virtual machines, andCloud broker is the mediator to perform the job in theresources. The IP suite can be viewed as a set oflayers, each layer having the property that it only usesthe functions of the layer below, and only exportsfunctionality to the layer above. A system thatimplements protocol behavior consisting of layers isknown as a protocol stack.Protocol stacks can beimplemented either in hardware or software, or amixture of both. Typically, only the lower layers areimplemented in hardware, with the higher layers beingimplemented in software.4.2. Chain of Trust

A chain of trust is designed to allow multipleusers to create and use software on the system, whichwould be more difficult if all the keys were storeddirectly in hardware. The signing authority will onlysign boot programs that enforce security, such as onlyrunning programs that are themselves signed, or onlyallowing signed code to have access to certain featuresof the machine. The final software can be trusted tohave certain properties, because if it had been illegallymodified its signature would be invalid, and theprevious software would not have executed it.

This process results in a chain of trust. Thefinal software can be trusted to have certain properties,because if it had been illegally modified its signaturewould be invalid, and the previous software would nothave executed it. The previous software can be trusted,

because it, in turn, would not have been loaded if itssignature would have been invalid. The trustworthinessof each layer is guaranteed by the one before, back tothe Trust Anchor - the hardware. It would be possibleto have the hardware check the suitability for everysingle piece of software. However, this would notproduce the flexibility that a "chain" provides. In achain, any given link can be replaced with a differentversion to provide different properties, without havingto go all the way back to the trust anchor.4.3. Scheduling

Scheduling is the process of deciding how tocommit resources between varieties of possible tasks.Shared resources are available at certain times andevents are planned during these times. The schedulemaintains separation between users of the resources.Schedulers, often termed workload automation,typically provide a single point of control fordefinition and monitoring. Scheduling is the methodby which threads, processes or data flows are givenaccess to system resources. This is usually done toload balance a system effectively or achieve a targetquality of service. The need for a scheduling algorithmarises from the requirement for most modern systemsto perform multitasking and multiplexing.The scheduler also must ensure that processes canmeet deadlines; this is crucial for keeping the systemstable. Shared resources are available at certain timesand events are planned during these times. Theschedule maintains separation between users of theresources. The process of creating a schedule is calledscheduling. These provide the production schedulerwith powerful graphical interfaces which can be usedto visually optimize real-time workloads in variousstages of production, and pattern recognition allowsthe software to automatically create schedulingopportunities which might not be apparent without thisview into the data.

Job scheduling is most important task in cloudcomputing environment because user have to pay forresources used based upon time. Hence efficientutilization of resources must be important and for thatscheduling plays a vital role to get maximum benefitfrom the resources. In this paper we are studyingvarious scheduling algorithm and issues related tothem in cloud computing. The main advantage of jobscheduling algorithm is to achieve a high performancecomputing and the best system throughput.4.4. Trust Management

The trust management is an abstract systemthat processes symbolic representations of social trust,usually to aid automated decision-making process. Theautomated verification of actions against securitypolicies. In this concept, actions are allowed if theydemonstrate sufficient credentials, irrespective of their

www.ijsret.org


actual identity, separating symbolic representation oftrust from the actual person.

Trust management can be seen as a symbol-based automation of social decisions related to trust,where social agents instruct their technicalrepresentations how to act while meeting technicalrepresentations of other agents. Further automation ofthis process can lead to automated trust negotiationswhere technical devices negotiate trust by selectivelydisclosing credential, according to rules defined bysocial agents that they represent.4.5. Resource Allocation

Resource allocation is used to assign theavailable resources in an economic way. Resourceallocation is the scheduling of activities and theresources required by those activities while taking intoconsideration both the resource availability. Resourcescould be access to a section of the computer's memory,data in a device interface buffer, one or more files, orthe required amount of processing power. A singleprocessor can only perform one process at a time,regardless of the amount of programs loaded by theuser.

The main objective is to smooth resourcesrequirements by shifting slack jobs beyond periods ofpeak requirements. Some of the methods essentiallyreplicate what a human scheduler would do if he hadenough time; others make use of unusual devices orprocedures designed especially for the computer. Theyof course depend for their success on the speed andcapabilities of electronic computers. What to produceconcerns allocation of resources among alternativeuses. The economy must allocate the varieties of goodsand services which will yield the greatest satisfactionto consumers. The process of dividing up anddistributing available, limited resources to competing,alternative uses that satisfy unlimited wants and needs.An efficient resource allocation exists if society hasachieved the highest possible level of satisfaction ofwants and needs from the available resources ANDresources cannot be allocated differently to achieveany greater satisfaction.

5. EXPERIMENT AND RESULTESThis paper presented trustworthy scheduling in

cloud environment provide the cloudsim framework.Fig 3provide the analysis of scheduling based on thecloud computing framework. It also specifies theallocation of resource based on the virtual machine.Allocation consists of two constraints as are length andsize. Fig 4 provides the allocation of resource based onthe total length through the cloudlet length andmultiplication of performance evaluation.

Fig. 3: Performance analysis

Fig. 4: Performance analysis for total load

6. CONCLUSIONCritical infrastructure services and organizations alikewill not outsource their critical applications to a publiccloud without strong assurances that their requirementswill be en-forced. This is a challenging problem toaddress, which we have been working on as part ofTClouds project. A key point for ad-dressing such aproblem is providing a trustworthy cloud schedulersupported by trustworthy data enabling the schedulerto make the right decision. Such a trustworthy sourceof data is related to both user requirements andinfrastructure properties. User requirements andinfrastructure properties are enormous and assuringtheir trustworthiness is our long term objective. Thiscovers one of the most important properties which isabout measuring the trust status of the cloudinfrastructure, and enabling users to define theirminimal acceptable level of trust.

Key management is the management ofcryptographic keys in a cryptosystem. This includesdealing with the generation, exchange, storage, use,and replacement of keys. It includes cryptographicprotocol design, key servers, user procedures, andother relevant protocols. Key management concernskeys at the user level, either between users or systems.This is in contrast to key scheduling; key schedulingtypically refers to the internal handling of key materialwithin the operation of a cipher. Successful key

www.ijsret.org


management is critical to the security of acryptosystem. In practice it is arguably the mostdifficult aspect of cryptography because it involvessystem policy, user training, organizational anddepartmental interactions, and coordination betweenall of these elements. In future work can includetrustworthiness of user through key managementtechnique to provide security and enhance theperformance of scheduling in cloud environment.

REFERENCES1) M. A. Imad, 2011 “Clouds infrastructure

taxonomy, properties, and managementservices,” inAdvancesinComputingandCommunications

2) I. M. Abbadi, 2011 “Middleware services atcloud virtual layer,” in Proc. 2ndInt.WorkshoponDependableService-OrientedandCloudComput. (DSOC2011), Aug.IEEE Comput. Soc..

3) M. A. Imad, 2011 “Toward trustworthy clouds’Internet scale critical infrastructure,” in Proc. 7thInform. Security Practice and ExperienceConf.LNCS (ISPEC ’11), Berlin, Germany, Jun.6672, pp. 73–84,Springer-Verlag.

4) I. M. Abbadi, 2012 “Clouds trust anchors,” inProc. 11th IEEE Int.Conf. Trust, Security andPrivacy in Comput. andCommun.(IEEETrustCom-11), Liverpool, U.K., pp. 127–136.

5) I. M. Abbadi, 2011 “Muntahaalawneh, and andrewmartin. Secure virtual layermanagement inclouds,” in Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Trust,Securityand Privacy in Comput. andCommun.(IEEE TrustCom-10), Nov. 2011, pp. 99–110.

6) I. M. Abbadi and N. Cornelius, 2011 “Dynamicsof trust in clouds — challenges and researchagenda,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. InternetTechnol.and Secured Trans. (ICITST-2011), Dec.2011, pp. 110–115.

7) A. Michael, F. Armando, G. Rean, D. J. Anthony,H. K. Randy, K. Andrew, L.Gunho, A. P. David,R. Ariel, S. Ion, and Z. Matei, Above the Clouds:A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing.

8) S. Berger, R. Cáceres, D. Pendarakis, R. Sailer,E.Valdez, R.Perez, W. Schildhauer, and D.Srinivasan, 2008 “Tvdc: managing security in thetrusted virtual datacenter,” SIGOPSOper. Syst.Rev., vol. 42, Jan. 2008.

9) S. Bleikertz, M. Schunter, C. W. Probst, D.Pendarakis, and K.Eriksson, 2010 “Security auditsof multi-tier virtual infrastructures in publicinfrastructure clouds,” in Proc.2010ACMWorkshoponCloudComput.SecurityWorkshop (CCSW ’10), New York, NY,USA, 2010, pp. 93–102, ACM.

10) R. Chow, P. Golle, M. Jakobsson, E. Shi, J.Staddon, R. Masuoka, and J. Molina, 2009“Controlling data in the cloud: outsourcingcomputation without outsourcing control,” in Proc.2009ACMWorkshoponCloudComput. Security(CCSW ’09), New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 85–90, ACM.

11) Y. Gasmi, A.-R. Sadeghi, P. Stewin, M. Unger,and N. Asokan, 2007 “Beyond secure channels,”in Proc.2007ACMWorkshoponScalableTrustedComput.(STC’07), New York, NY, USA, 2007, pp. 30–40,ACM.

12) K. M. Khan and Q. M. Malluhi, 2010“Establishing trust in cloud computing,”ITProfessional, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 20–27, Sep.2010.

13) B. Hay, K. L. Nance, and M. Bishop, 2011“Storm clouds rising: Security challenges for IaaScloud computing,” in Proc.HICSSIEEEComput.Soc., 2011, pp. 17.

14) J. Keith and N. Burkhard, The Future of CloudComputing — Opportunities For European CloudComputing Beyond 2010.

15) K. M. Khan and Q. M. Malluhi,“Establishing trust in cloudcomputing,”ITProfessional, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 20–27,Sep. 2010.

16) J. Lyle and A. Martin, “On the feasibility ofremote attestation for web services,” in Proc.IEEEInt. Symp. onSecureComput.(SecureCom09), 2009, pp. 283–288.

17) J. M. McCune, T. Jaeger, S. Berger, R. Caceres,and R. Sailer, 2006 “Shamon: A system fordistributed mandatory access control,” in Proc.IEEEComput. Soc. 22ndAnnu. Comput.SecurityApplicat.Conf. (ACSAC ’06) ,Washington, DC, USA, 2006, pp. 23–32.

18) P. Bryan, M. M. Jonathan, and P. Adrian, 2010“Bootstrapping trust in commodity computers,” inProc. 2010IEEESymp. SecurityandPrivacy(SP’10), Washington, DC, USA, 2010, pp. 414–429,IEEE Comput.

towards trust management system for resource scheduling in cloud computing

Documents