tracks swimming hippopotami: koobi fora (kenya) · 2015-06-17 · dinosaur swim traces? dino tracks...

1
Bournemouth.ac.uk [email protected] ABSTRACT Here the authors report an ichnological surface close to Koobi Fora (Kenya) dating to 1.4 Ma.. The surface is marked by hominin tracks, as well as many traces from large animals. A southern excavation of the surface some 70 m from the hominin tracks displays a diverse range of animal track typologies, most of which appear to have been made by a four digit animal moving via punting or bottom walking in a shallow water body. Due to the track morphology and the associated fossil record, the non-hominin tracks are interpreted as being made by hippopotami, potentially including pygmy species or juveniles. The track typologies are interpreted using modern analogue observations of hippopotami sub-aquatic locomotion. This work provides important environmental context for adjacent hominin tracks and fossils, as well as providing the first recorded description of fossilized swim tracks made by mammals. The site has implications for the interpretation of swim tracks in the geological record particularly the widespread and controversial tracks made by sauropods and other dinosaurs. Matthew R Bennett, Sarita A Morse and Peter Falkingham Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK Liverpool John Moores University,Liverpool L3 3AF, UK Bennett et al. (2014). Tracks made by swimming Hippopotami: an example from Koobi Fora (Turkana Basin, Kenya) Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 409: 9–23. The site GaJi10 is located just south of Koobi Fora. The fine-grained silts dip into the hillside as shown above. Hominin footprints, probably made by Homo erectus has been found just to the north of the excavation shown and date from 1.4 million years ago (Behrensmeyer et al., 1979). In contrast to those found at Ileret 45 km to the north they appear to have been formed in a semi-aquatic environment on the margins of a lake fed by ephemeral streams. In the excavation shown above there are multiple tracks made by swimming hippos ‘punting’ of the floor of a shallow pool. The three-dimensional images below show some of the tracks present. The site consists of a series of silts and fine sands deposited at the edge of a shallow lake as indicated in the block diagram below. 100 mm 100 mm 100 mm 100 mm E 100 mm 60 km Ileret-FwJj14E GaJi10 Koobi Fora Lake Turkana 3 o N 37 o E 5 o N 360 365 370 375 380 385 390 36.222 36.224 36.226 36.228 36.232 36.234 36.236 36.238 KMNER1808 KMNER734 GaJi10 GaJi14 Easting (Degrees) Height (m) West East Fault Block Tracks swimming hippopotami: Koobi Fora (Kenya) 145 mm 318 mm 200mm 79 MM A B C D High Low C Location of GaJi10, one of a series of back-tilted fault blocks GaJi10 1 km Hippos have distinctive feet and are unable to swim according to most authoratives. They move about in water by ‘bottom-walking’ or ‘punting’. This involves them using their legs to move underwater by a process of pushing off the bottom and gliding. This is illustrated in the sequence of photographs below and represents a small part of the video and time-lapse footage used by the research team to help intepret the Koobi Fora tracks. Two different types of motion were observed: (1) periods of gliding, frequently maintained by contact via a single extended forelimb; and (2) more stable trot when greater control was needed. Each of these different types of motion is associated with a different type of swim tace. As the feet make contact with the ground they leave different tracks depending on the contact force and the number of digits in contact with the ground. This results in a very wide range of trace fossils being produced by a single animal. There remains considerable debate about whether hippos can actually swim with most authoratives saying that they can’t. However extinct and extant hippos species are found amongst the faunal assemblage of a number of island, including for example those of the Mediterranean which does beg the question as to how they got there? Further research is currently on-going to explore this question. Dinosaur swim traces? Dino tracks give us some insight into how these large animals roamed our planet, but how did these giant beasts move in water? Swim tracks have been found for a number of dinosaurs including theropods and sauropods and it has been suggested that they might propel themselves along by ‘bottom-walking or punting’. These traces of fossilised motion have attracted considerable controversy. The hippo swim traces described from Koobi Fora are not only the first swim traces to be described for a large mammal but may help intepret some of the more controversial dionsaur traces. Perhaps the most striking aspect of the hippo traces is the shear diversity of different track morphologies associated with a sinlge animal, each representing a distinctive sub-aquative locomotive behaviour.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tracks swimming hippopotami: Koobi Fora (Kenya) · 2015-06-17 · Dinosaur swim traces? Dino tracks give us some insight into how these large animals roamed our planet, but how did

Bournemouth.ac.uk [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Here the authors report an ichnological surface close to Koobi Fora (Kenya) dating to 1.4 Ma.. The surface is marked by hominin tracks, as well as many traces from largeanimals. A southern excavation of the surface some 70 m from the hominin tracks displays a diverse range of animal track typologies, most of which appear to have beenmade by a four digit animal moving via punting or bottom walking in a shallow water body. Due to the track morphology and the associated fossil record, the non-hominintracks are interpreted as being made by hippopotami, potentially including pygmy species or juveniles. The track typologies are interpreted using modern analogue observationsof hippopotami sub-aquatic locomotion. This work provides important environmental context for adjacent hominin tracks and fossils, as well as providing the first recordeddescription of fossilized swim tracks made by mammals. The site has implications for the interpretation of swim tracks in the geological record particularly the widespreadand controversial tracks made by sauropods and other dinosaurs.

Matthew R Bennett, Sarita A Morse and Peter FalkinghamBournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK

Liverpool John Moores University,Liverpool L3 3AF, UK

Bennett et al. (2014). Tracks made by swimming Hippopotami: an example from Koobi Fora (Turkana Basin, Kenya)

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 409: 9–23.

The site GaJi10 is located just south of Koobi Fora. The fine-grained silts dipinto the hillside as shown above. Hominin footprints, probably made by Homoerectus has been found just to the north of the excavation shown and date from1.4 million years ago (Behrensmeyer et al., 1979). In contrast to those found atIleret 45 km to the north they appear to have been formed in a semi-aquaticenvironment on the margins of a lake fed by ephemeral streams. In theexcavation shown above there are multiple tracks made by swimming hippos‘punting’ of the floor of a shallow pool. The three-dimensional images belowshow some of the tracks present.

The site consists of a series of silts and fine sands deposited at the edge ofa shallow lake as indicated in the block diagram below.

100 mm 100 mm

100 mm 100 mm

E

100 mm

60 km

Ileret-FwJj14E

GaJi10

Koobi Fora

Lake Turkana

3oN

37oE

5oN

360

365

370

375

380

385

390

36.222 36.224 36.226 36.228 36.232 36.234 36.236 36.238

KM

NE

R18

08

KM

NE

R73

4

GaJ

i10

GaJ

i14

Easting (Degrees)

Hei

ght (

m)

West EastFault Block

Tracks swimming hippopotami:Koobi Fora (Kenya)

145 mm

318 mm

200mm

79 MM

A

B

C D

HighLow

C

Location of GaJi10, one of a series of back-tilted fault blocks

GaJ

i10

1 km

Hippos have distinctive feet and are unable to swim according to most authoratives. They move aboutin water by ‘bottom-walking’ or ‘punting’. This involves them using their legs to move underwater by aprocess of pushing off the bottom and gliding. This is illustrated in the sequence of photographs belowand represents a small part of the video and time-lapse footage used by the research team to help intepretthe Koobi Fora tracks. Two different types of motion were observed: (1) periods of gliding, frequently maintainedby contact via a single extended forelimb; and (2) more stable trot when greater control was needed. Each ofthese different types of motion is associated with a different type of swim tace.

As the feet make contact with the ground they leave different tracks depending on the contact force andthe number of digits in contact with the ground. This results in a very wide range of trace fossils beingproduced by a single animal.

There remains considerable debate about whether hippos can actually swim with most authoratives saying thatthey can’t. However extinct and extant hippos species are found amongst the faunal assemblage of a numberof island, including for example those of the Mediterranean which does beg the question as to how they got there?

Further research is currently on-going to explore this question.

Dinosaur swim traces?Dino tracks give us some insight into how these large animals roamed our planet, but how did these giant beasts move in water? Swim tracks have been found for anumber of dinosaurs including theropods and sauropods and it has been suggested that they might propel themselves along by ‘bottom-walking or punting’. These traces offossilised motion have attracted considerable controversy. The hippo swim traces described from Koobi Fora are not only the first swim traces to be described for a largemammal but may help intepret some of the more controversial dionsaur traces. Perhaps the most striking aspect of the hippo traces is the shear diversity of different trackmorphologies associated with a sinlge animal, each representing a distinctive sub-aquative locomotive behaviour.