transcatheter laa closure: why, when & in whomadherence to oac proportion of days covered 54.1...
TRANSCRIPT
Transcatheter LAA Closure: Why, When & InWhom
SCRIPPS CLINIC
Matthew J. Price MDDirector, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Scripps ClinicLa Jolla, CA, USAEmail: [email protected]: 858-824-5269
The left atrial appendage: our most lethal human attachment!Surgical implicationsq
W. Dudley Johnsona,* , A.K. Ganjoob, Christopher D. Stonec, Ramahalli C. Srivyasa,Mary Howarda,d
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 17 (2000) 718±722
www.elsevier.com/locate/ejcts
SCRIPPS CLINIC
• The LAA is the source of thrombus in most AFpatients with thromboembolic events
Adherence to OACProportion of Days Covered
54.148.7 50.1 50.1
4240
50
60
CHA2DS2VASc score ≥4
here
nc
e
Median: 1.1 yrs
SCRIPPS CLINIC
©2018 MFMER | slide-23
0
10
20
30
Apixaban Dabigatran Rivaroxaban All NOACs Warfarin
%A
dh
e
Yao et al: J Am Heart Assoc doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.003074, 2016
THE NOACS: CLINICAL TRIAL SUMMARY
RERE--LYLY ROCKETROCKET--AFAF ARISTOTLEARISTOTLE ENGAGEENGAGE--AFAF
DrugDrug DabigatranDabigatran150mg/d150mg/d
RivoraxabanRivoraxaban20mg/day20mg/day
ApixabanApixaban5mg bid5mg bid
EdoxabanEdoxaban60mg/day60mg/day
CHADSCHADS22 2.22.2 3.53.5 2.12.1 2.82.8
TTR, controlTTR, control 67%67% 58%58% 66%66% 68%68%
IschemicIschemic 0.760.76 (0.60(0.60-- 0.940.94 (0.75(0.75-- 0.920.92 (0.74(0.74-- 1.001.00 (0.83(0.83--
SCRIPPS CLINIC
strokestroke 0.98)0.98) 1.17)1.17) 1.14)1.14) 1.19)1.19)
HemorrhagicHemorrhagicstrokestroke
0.260.26 (0.14(0.14--0.49)0.49)
0.590.59 (0.37(0.37--0.93)0.93)
0.510.51 (0.34(0.34--0.75)0.75)
0.540.54 (0.38(0.38--0.77)0.77)
AllAll--causecausemortalitymortality
0.880.88 (0.77(0.77--1.00)1.00)
0.850.85 (0.70(0.70--1.02)1.02)
0.890.89 (0.80(0.80--0.998)0.998)
0.920.92 (0.83(0.83--1.01)1.01)
Major bleedMajor bleed 0.930.93 (0.81(0.81--1.07)1.07)
1.041.04 (0.90(0.90--1.20)1.20)
0.690.69 (0.60(0.60--0.80)0.80)
0.800.80 (0.71(0.71--0.91)0.91)
GI bleedingGI bleeding 1.501.50 (1.19(1.19--1.89)1.89)
1.391.39 (1.19(1.19--1.61)1.61)
0.890.89 (0.70(0.70--1.15)1.15)
1.231.23 (1.02(1.02--1.50)1.50)
WATCHMAN LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUDER
CatheterCatheter--based Deliverybased Delivery Available sizes: 21, 24, 27, 30, 33 mmAvailable sizes: 21, 24, 27, 30, 33 mm
diameterdiameter
IntraIntra--LAA designLAA design•• Avoids contact with left atrial wall toAvoids contact with left atrial wall to
help prevent complicationshelp prevent complications
SCRIPPS CLINIC
help prevent complicationshelp prevent complications
NitinolNitinol FrameFrame•• 10 active fixation anchors10 active fixation anchors -- designeddesigned
to engage tissue for stabilityto engage tissue for stability
Proximal FaceProximal Face•• 160 micron membrane PET cap160 micron membrane PET cap
designed to block emboli and promotedesigned to block emboli and promotehealinghealing
WATCHMAN: Clinical Trial Timeline (Manufacturer sponsor/support)
2002 PilotN=66Non-randomizedFeasibility andSafety
2008 CAPRegistryN=566Non-randomizedAdd’l patientsand follow-up
2010 PREVAILN=407RandomizedComparison:warfarin
2012 CAP2RegistryN=579Non-RandomizedAdd’l patientsand follow-up
2017 ASAP TOON= Up to 888RandomizedUS IndicationExpansionWorldwide study
Mar 2015Mar 2015FDA ApprovalFDA Approval
2019 OPTIONN=TBDRandomizedComparison: OAC*trial design indevelopment2017
WATCH-TAVRN=312RandomizedTAVR+WATCHMAN
2005 PROTECT AFN=707RandomizedComparison: warfarin
2009 ASAPN=150Non-randomizedPatients Contra-indicated to warfarin*
2013 EWOLUTION, WASPRegistriesN=1020, N=201Non-randomizedReal-world, All comers
2016 US NESTed NCDR LAAORegistryN=2000Post-approval statistical analysis
2017 SALUTEN= 42Non-randomizedJapanese ApprovalStudy 2018 PINNACLE
FLXN=400Non-randomizedFLX DeviceUS IDE
2002 2013 2018
*Not US Indication
SCRIPPS CLINIC
TWO PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED, NON-INFERIORITY TRIALS OF LAA CLOSURE VS. WARFARIN
POST-PROCEDURAL ADJUNCTIVE PHARMACOTHERAPY IN THE WATCHMAN CLINICALTRIALS
SCRIPPS CLINICPrice MJ et al, JACCPrice MJ et al, JACC CardiovascCardiovasc IntervInterv 2015; 8:19252015; 8:1925--32.32.
HR p-value
Efficacy 0.82 0.3
All stroke or SE 0.96 0.9
Ischemic stroke or SE 1.7 0.08
PATIENT-LEVEL PROTECT AF/PREVAIL META-ANALYSIS AT 5 YEARS: WATCHMAN LAACCOMPARED WITH WARFARIN
SCRIPPS CLINIC
Hemorrhagic stroke 0.2 0.0022
Ischemic stroke or SE >7 days 1.4 0.3
CV/unexplained death 0.59 0.03
All-cause death 0.73 0.04
Major bleed, all 0.91 0.6
Major bleeding, non procedure-related 0.48 0.0003
0.01 0.1 1 10
Favors WATCHMAN Favors warfarin
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)JACC 2017
HR p-value
Efficacy 0.82 0.3
All stroke or SE 0.96 0.9
Ischemic stroke or SE 1.7 0.08
PATIENT-LEVEL PROTECT AF/PREVAIL META-ANALYSIS AT 5 YEARS: WATCHMAN LAACCOMPARED WITH WARFARIN
SCRIPPS CLINIC
Hemorrhagic stroke 0.2 0.0022
Ischemic stroke or SE >7 days 1.4 0.3
CV/unexplained death 0.59 0.03
All-cause death 0.73 0.04
Major bleed, all 0.91 0.6
Major bleeding, non procedure-related 0.48 0.0003
0.01 0.1 1 10
Favors WATCHMAN Favors warfarin
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)JACC 2017
1.50%
2.00% Disabling/Fatal Strokes Non-Disabling Strokes
PATIENT-LEVEL META-ANALYSIS: WATCHMAN ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERIOR REDUCTIONIN DISABLING STROKES
55%
SCRIPPS CLINIC
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
WATCHMAN warfarin
Disabling Stroke defined as MRS ≥2
HR 0.45 (0.21 – 0.94)P=0.03
55%Reduction
Reddy VY et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(24):2964-75
90
100
WATCHMAN
SCRIPPS CLINIC
Free ofMajor
BleedingEvent
(%)
6 6046 1808 4550
60
70
80
0 7
Warfarin+Aspirin
Warfarin+Aspirin
Plavix+Aspirin Aspirin
WATCHMANWarfarin
72%Relative ReductionIn Major Bleeding
WATCHMANArm
HR 0.28 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.35]
Price MJ et al, JACCPrice MJ et al, JACC CardiovascCardiovasc IntervInterv 2015; 8:19252015; 8:1925--32.32.
TYPES AND FREQUENCIES OF LATE BLEEDS IN THE WATCHMAN RCTS
SCRIPPS CLINICPrice MJ et al, JACCPrice MJ et al, JACC CardiovascCardiovasc IntervInterv 2015; 8:19252015; 8:1925--32.32.
OUTCOMES IN THE INITIAL WATCHMAN POST-APPROVAL COMMERCIAL EXPERIENCE(N=3822)
Post-FDA Approval Post-FDA Approval
ExperienceExperience
ComplicationsComplications
Pericardial TamponadePericardial Tamponade 39 (1.02%)39 (1.02%)
Treated with Pericardiocentesis Treated with Pericardiocentesis 24 (0.63%)24 (0.63%)
Treated Surgically Treated Surgically 12 (0.31%)12 (0.31%)
Resulted in Death Resulted in Death 3 (0.078%)3 (0.078%)
SCRIPPS CLINIC
Resulted in Death Resulted in Death 3 (0.078%)3 (0.078%)
Pericardial Effusion – No InterventionPericardial Effusion – No Intervention 11 (0.29%)11 (0.29%)
Procedure-Related StrokeProcedure-Related Stroke 3 (0.078%)3 (0.078%)
Device EmbolizationDevice Embolization 9 (0.24%)9 (0.24%)
Removed Percutaneously Removed Percutaneously 33
Removed Surgically Removed Surgically 66
DeathDeath
Procedure-Related Mortality Procedure-Related Mortality 3 (0.078%)3 (0.078%)
Additional Mortality within 7 days Additional Mortality within 7 days 1 (0.026%)1 (0.026%)
Holmes DR, JACC 2017Holmes DR, JACC 2017
LAAC COMPLICATION RATES IN PERSPECTIVE: TAMPONADE RATES IN PROGRESS CTOREGISTRY
In-hospital MACE: components
MI 1%
Tamponade requiringpericardiocentesis 0.9%
N = 3,055
SCRIPPS CLINIC
pericardiocentesis 0.9%
Death 0.8%
Re-PCI 0.3%
Emergent CABG 0.2%
Stroke 0.2%
MACE 3%
WATCHMAN FLX: Design Features18 Strut Frame
Full or Partial RecaptureMinimum LAA Depth = ½ Device Size
10 Strut FramePartial Recapture
Minimum LAA Depth = Ostium Dia.
WATCHMAN WATCHMAN FLX
Closed Distal EndControlled Deployment
Two Rows of18 Anchors
‘J’ anchor'Straight’ anchor
One row of10 Anchors
Price MJ, ACC 2019
ASAP-TOO RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Study ObjectiveEvaluate LAA Closure with WATCHMAN in NVAF patients deemed not suitable for OAC
Study DesignProspective, multi-centerRandomized 2:1 (Watchman vs Control)
Primary Endpoint
Effectiveness EndpointTime to first occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
Safety Endpoint7-day rate of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device- or
Primary Endpoint7-day rate of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device- orprocedure- related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascularintervention
Patient Population 888
Number of Sites 100 global sites
Follow-up*
• 3 month with TEE• 6,18 month phone visit• 12 month with TEE• Bi-annually for years 2-5
Holmes et al. AHJ 2017;189: 68-74.
ASAP-TOO RANDOMIZATION ASSIGNMENTS
Visit Interval Aspirin Clopidogrel*
Discharge through3-month visit
Yes, suggested dose:75-100mg
YesSuggested dose: 75mg
3-month visit through12-month visit**
Yes, suggested dose:75-100mg
No, unless otherindication
Device Group Medical Therapy Control Group Treatment
• Single antiplatelet therapy or notherapy for the duration of the trialat the discretion of the studyphysician.
12-month visit** 75-100mg indication
Following the12-month visit**
No, unless otherindication
No, unless otherindication
*Clopidogrel may be substituted with ticagrelor or prasugrel if the subject requires the medication forother indications (e.g. acute coronary syndromes treated with drug eluting stents) or if the subjecthas a known resistance to clopidogrel.
**Patients are allowed to be on dual antiplatelet therapy (outside of the protocol required 3- monthsperiod) if indicated due to a condition other than WATCHMAN implantation.
Holmes et al. AHJ 2017; 189:68-74
• Subjects will be allowed to be ondual antiplatelet therapy ifindicated.
MY DECISION MAKING SCHEME FOR STROKE PREVENTION THERAPY IN AF
2 2
AF patient at highthromboembolic risk byCHA2DS2VASC score
Low bleeding risk,Low bleeding risk,Not good candidate for long-term OAC (prior bleed, Absolute or strong
SCRIPPS CLINIC
preferences
Low bleeding risk,compliant, can afford
therapy, no strong patientpreferences
NOAC
Not good candidate for long-term OAC (prior bleed,bleeding risk, on APT, non-compliant, treatmentfailure, poor VKA candidate & can’t afford/take
NOAC) but can tolerate short-term therapy
Commercial WatchmanLAA Closure
Absolute or strongcontraindication to even
short-term OAC
ASAP-TOO
(WM vs notherapy)
QUARTERLY LAAO PROCEDURES IN THE UNITED STATES*
33403903
4231
5037 50805562
6111
4000
6000
8000
SCRIPPS CLINIC
18 31 92 223737
13541658
2197 24272949
3340
0
2000
4000
*Entered into NCDR LAAO Registry
Price MJ for the NCDR LAAO steering committee, September 2019 San Francisco, CA
CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF LAAO PROCEDURES IN THE UNITED STATES*
23160
28197
33277
38839
44950
30,000
40,000
50,000
SCRIPPS CLINIC
18 49 141 364 1101 2455 41136310
873711686
1502618929
23160
0
10,000
20,000
*Entered into NCDR LAAO Registry
Price MJ for the NCDR LAAO steering committee, September 2019 San Francisco, CA
SCRIPPS CLINIC
SCRIPPS CLINIC
CURRENT LAAC VOLUMES IN PERSPECTIVE RELATIVE TO THEBURDEN OF AF IN THE UNITED STATES
Total AF population
NV-AF (95%)
5 million patients
4.75 million patients
45,000 patients in NCDR LAAO Registry:
CHA2DS2VASC≥2
(75%)
OAC Intolerant (35%)
3.56 million patients
1.25 million patients
45,000 patients in NCDR LAAO Registry:3.6% of eligible population?
SCRIPPS CLINIC
SCRIPPS CLINIC