transesophageal color flow doppler and echocardiographic features of normal and regurgitant st. jude...

3
FlGURE 2. The sensitivity and soecificity of different electrocardiographic (ECG) cri- teria of lsft ventricular hypertrophy are compared. Because the sensitivity and the accuracy of the RVs:RVs ratio >0.6!5 are much higher, this index is the best for screening of left ventricular hypertrophy in the hypertensive patient. LR + LS = larg- est R wave plus largest S wave (ampli- tude) in precordial leads; R-E score = Romhilt-Estes point score system; RaVL = R-wave ampliide in aVL; RV5 + SVl = R-wave amplitude in lead Rs or Rs (the largest) plus S-wave amplitude in lead VI; RVs:R& >0.65 = RVs:RVs voltage ratio >0.65 Raw Rw4wt LR+LS El SENSKIVKY m I EC0 CRITERIA SPEClFlClTY ACCURACY ity, specificity and accuracy of each cutoff point studied in the RV&RVs voltage ratio, and other measurements, are listed in Table I and shown in Figure 1. A compari- sonamong R&RVs >0.65 and other criteria is shown in Figure 2. As the ratio RV6:RVs increases, the specificity increases at the expense of sensitivity. A ratio RV6:RVs >0.65 yields the best accuracy for thesepatients, for whom a techniquewith high sensitivity is needed. A ratio RV6:RVs >0.60 has the bestsensitivity but poorer speci- ficity and a lesseraccuracy. The other criteria have a very high specificity but a sensitivity far less than the RVk:RVj voltage ratio. According to our data, a ratio between the R-wave voltage of leads V6 and Vs X.65 is a simple and useful index of LV hypertrophy in the hypertensive patient, with a sensitivity of 8970, a specificity of 21% and an accuracy of 64%. This index is much better than most frequently used ones for the study of cardiac hypertrophy in systemic hypertension, given that a highly sensitive technique is needed for screening. This is more important if we realize that electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy has indepen- dent prognostic significance in hypertension5 1. Koito H, Spodick DH. Accuracy of the RV6:RV5 voltage ratio for increased left ventricular mass. Am J Cardioi 1988;62:986-987. 2. Spodick DH, Koito H. Differential sensitivity of the RV6:RV5 voltage ratio by pathogenesis of left ventricular hypertrophy and diagnostic cutpoint. Am J Car- dial 1989;64:817-819. 3. Chou T-Ch. Left ventricular hypertrophy. In: Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 0rhtdo:Grune & Stratton, 1986;46-65. 4. Devereux RB, Philips MC, Casale PB, Eisenberg RR, Kligfield P. Geometric determination of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1983;67:907-911. 5. Kannel WB, Dannenberg AL. Prevalence and natural history of electrocardio- graphic left ventricular hypertrophy. In: Messerli FH, ed. The Heart and Hyper- tension. New York:Yorke Medical Books, 1987;53-61. ransesophageal Color Flow Doppler and Echocardiographic Features Of Normal and Regurgitant St. Jude Medical Prostheses in the Mitral Valve Position Mohsin Alam, MD, Jeffrey B. Serwin, MD, Howard S. Rosman, MD, Mita Sheth, MD, Irene Sun, RN, RDMS, Norman A. Silverman, MD, and Sidney Goldstein, MD ransthoracic echocardiography and color flow Dopp- aortic valve position.” These studies have emphasized the ler have been shown to be of value in evaluating limitations of this technique in diagnosing SJM mitral regurgitant St. Jude Medical (SJM) prostheses in the regurgitation because of flow masking and signal atten- From the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardio- uation produced by the echo-reflective metallic valves2 vascular Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Henry Ford Hospital, Transesophageal echocardiography and color flow Dopp- 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan 48202. Manuscript ler overcome these problems and show promise in evalu- received April 16,199O; revised manuscript received and accepted May ating normal functioning and regurgitant SJM mitral 21, 1990. valves.3,4This report describes our transesophageal ultra- THE AMERICAN JOIJRNAL OF CARDIOLOGY OCTOBER 1, 1990

Upload: mohsin-alam

Post on 26-Aug-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transesophageal color flow Doppler and echocardiographic features of normal and regurgitant St. Jude Medical prostheses in the mitral valve position

FlGURE 2. The sensitivity and soecificity of different electrocardiographic (ECG) cri- teria of lsft ventricular hypertrophy are compared. Because the sensitivity and the accuracy of the RVs:RVs ratio >0.6!5 are much higher, this index is the best for screening of left ventricular hypertrophy in the hypertensive patient. LR + LS = larg- est R wave plus largest S wave (ampli- tude) in precordial leads; R-E score = Romhilt-Estes point score system; RaVL = R-wave ampliide in aVL; RV5 + SVl = R-wave amplitude in lead Rs or Rs (the largest) plus S-wave amplitude in lead VI; RVs:R& >0.65 = RVs:RVs voltage ratio >0.65

Raw Rw4wt LR+LS

El SENSKIVKY

m I EC0 CRITERIA

SPEClFlClTY ACCURACY

ity, specificity and accuracy of each cutoff point studied in the RV&RVs voltage ratio, and other measurements, are listed in Table I and shown in Figure 1. A compari- son among R&RVs >0.65 and other criteria is shown in Figure 2. As the ratio RV6:RVs increases, the specificity increases at the expense of sensitivity. A ratio RV6:RVs >0.65 yields the best accuracy for these patients, for whom a technique with high sensitivity is needed. A ratio RV6:RVs >0.60 has the best sensitivity but poorer speci- ficity and a lesser accuracy. The other criteria have a very high specificity but a sensitivity far less than the RVk:RVj voltage ratio.

According to our data, a ratio between the R-wave voltage of leads V6 and Vs X.65 is a simple and useful index of LV hypertrophy in the hypertensive patient, with a sensitivity of 8970, a specificity of 21% and an accuracy of 64%. This index is much better than most frequently

used ones for the study of cardiac hypertrophy in systemic hypertension, given that a highly sensitive technique is needed for screening. This is more important if we realize that electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy has indepen- dent prognostic significance in hypertension5

1. Koito H, Spodick DH. Accuracy of the RV6:RV5 voltage ratio for increased left ventricular mass. Am J Cardioi 1988;62:986-987. 2. Spodick DH, Koito H. Differential sensitivity of the RV6:RV5 voltage ratio by pathogenesis of left ventricular hypertrophy and diagnostic cutpoint. Am J Car- dial 1989;64:817-819. 3. Chou T-Ch. Left ventricular hypertrophy. In: Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 0rhtdo:Grune & Stratton, 1986;46-65. 4. Devereux RB, Philips MC, Casale PB, Eisenberg RR, Kligfield P. Geometric determination of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1983;67:907-911. 5. Kannel WB, Dannenberg AL. Prevalence and natural history of electrocardio- graphic left ventricular hypertrophy. In: Messerli FH, ed. The Heart and Hyper- tension. New York:Yorke Medical Books, 1987;53-61.

ransesophageal Color Flow Doppler and Echocardiographic Features Of Normal and Regurgitant St. Jude Medical Prostheses in the Mitral Valve Position Mohsin Alam, MD, Jeffrey B. Serwin, MD, Howard S. Rosman, MD, Mita Sheth, MD, Irene Sun, RN, RDMS, Norman A. Silverman, MD, and Sidney Goldstein, MD

ransthoracic echocardiography and color flow Dopp- aortic valve position.” These studies have emphasized the ler have been shown to be of value in evaluating limitations of this technique in diagnosing SJM mitral

regurgitant St. Jude Medical (SJM) prostheses in the regurgitation because of flow masking and signal atten-

From the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardio- uation produced by the echo-reflective metallic valves2

vascular Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Henry Ford Hospital, Transesophageal echocardiography and color flow Dopp-

2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan 48202. Manuscript ler overcome these problems and show promise in evalu- received April 16,199O; revised manuscript received and accepted May ating normal functioning and regurgitant SJM mitral 21, 1990. valves.3,4 This report describes our transesophageal ultra-

THE AMERICAN JOIJRNAL OF CARDIOLOGY OCTOBER 1, 1990

Page 2: Transesophageal color flow Doppler and echocardiographic features of normal and regurgitant St. Jude Medical prostheses in the mitral valve position

sound experience with 28 normal functioning and 8 re- gurgitant SJM prostheses in the mitral valve position.

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogra- phy and colorpow Doppler studies were performed in 36 patients with SJMprostheses in the mitral position by previously reported techniques.’ At transesophageal study, the valves had been in place from I day to 42 months (mean 12 months). Of the 36 transesophageal valve studies, 28 appeared normal and 8 had features of valve regurgitation. In the 8 patients, regurgitation was substantiated by cardiac catheterization and angiogra- phy in 4, and valve replacement surgery in 5. The pros- thetic valve replacement surgery was performed within 8

FIGURE 1. Transesophageal color flow Doppler of a patient with ‘physiologic” mitral regurgitation. Note the 3 regurgi- tant jets (arrows), which are of narrow width, central, and have color flow reversal and mosaic features limited to only 1 of 3 jets. LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; MV = St. Jude mitral valve.

FIGURE 2. Transesophageal color flowDoppler of regurgitant St. Jude mitral valve (NIV). Note that the “pathologic” para- vaivular regurgitant jet (arrow) is eccentric in its origin, occu- pies X0% of the left atrial chamber, and demonstrates a marked degree of color flow reversal and mosaic feature. LA = left atrium: LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium.

days of transesophageal study. In IZpatients the transe- sophageal study was performed in the operating room, whereas in 24 others the tests were performed on awake patients.

All valves were evaluated by color flow Doppler for the presence or absence of valve regurgitation. The color flow gain and reject settings were adjusted to just below the level at which background noise was seen. The color flow Doppler regurgitant jet length, width, duration, lo- cation, shape and color characteristics were evaluated by playing back the video tape and frame-by-frame analy- sis. The extent of the prosthetic mitral valve regurgita- tion jet by transthoracic and transesophageal colorjlow Doppler was semiquantitated by relating it to the left atria1 chamber.6

Transesophageal color flow Doppler demonstrated 3 regurgitant jets (Figure 1) in all 28 normal functioning SJM mitral valves. The jet length varied from 1 to 3.5 cm and the width from 0.5 to 1.5 cm in awake patients and from 0.6 to 2.5 cm and 0.4 to 1 cm, respectively, in anesthetized patients. In all the patients, the regurgitant jet was holosystolic, centrally located and occupied <50% of the left atria1 chamber. Occasional color flow reversal and mosaic pattern limited to a small area of the jet wasobserved. In awake patients there was variation in the length, width and degree of color flow reversal and turbulence within the same jet and in the same persons at different times of the procedure.

Both transesophageal and transthoracic 2-dimen- sional echocardiography of normal functioning St. Jude mitral valves demonstrated multiple echoes emanating

FIGURE 3. Transesophageal color flow Doppler of a patient with regurgitant St. Jude mitrai valve (MV). Note that in this patient there are 2 pathologic regurgitant jets (arrows) filling the left atrium (LA). LV = left ventricle.

872 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY VOLUME 66

Page 3: Transesophageal color flow Doppler and echocardiographic features of normal and regurgitant St. Jude Medical prostheses in the mitral valve position

from the prosthetic disc masking the left ventricle and left atrium, respectively.

All 8 patients with regurgitant SJM prostheses had holosystolic color flow Doppler regurgitant jet occupy- ing 50 to 90% of the left atria1 chamber. The jet varied in length from 3 to 5 cm and in width from 3 to 4 cm. In all 8 patients, these jets were eccentric (paravalvular), shaped as a wide crescent or teardrop, with color flow reversal and mosaic pattern involving almost the entire jet (Figure 2). In 3 patients with previous endocarditis there were 2 sites of origin of the color flow regurgitant jet (Figure 3).

Transthoracic color flow Doppler using multiple acoustic windows in these 8patients demonstrated either no regurgitation in 4 patients or only mild regurgitation (4 patients). It was not possible from transthoracic color flow Doppler to determine ifthe mild regurgitation seen in these 4 patients was physiologic or pathologic. At the time of surgery the site of valve regurgitation was para- valvular in all 5 instances.

Both transesophageal and transthoracic 2-dimen- sional echocardiograms were normal in 7 of 8 regurgi- tant valves. Vegetations or mass echoes were observed in I patient who had a small mobile mass at the valve sewing ring demonstrable by transesophageal but not by transthoracic 2-dimensional echocardiography. At the time of surgery this patient had vegetations and dehis- cence of the valve at its sewing ring.

Transesophageal color flow Doppler reveals “physio- logic” holosystolic mitral regurgitation in all patients with normal functioning SJM prostheses in the mitral valve position. Variations in the extent and turbulence of physiologic mitral regurgitant jets during study may be

explained by fluctuations in systolic blood pressure that alter the left ventricular to left atria1 pressure gradient.

This study demonstrated that it is possible by transe- sophageal color flow Doppler to differentiate “physiolog ic” mitral regurgitation from pathologic regurgitation by the characteristics of the color flow regurgitant jet. All our patients with pathologic mitral regurgitation had a more extensive crescent- or teardrop-shaped jet, which was eccentric (paravalvular), with color flow reversal and mosaic pattern encompassing most of the regurgitant jet. This study indicates that transesophageal color flow Doppler is a highly sensitive indicator of SJM prosthetic regurgitation. Therefore, we recommend this test in every symptomatic patient in whom this entity is suspected, even if transthoracic color flow Doppler is normal.

1. Alam M, Rosman HS, McBroom D, Graham L, Magilligan DJ Jr, Khaja F, Stein PD. Color flow Doppler evaluation of St. Judemedical prosthetic valves. Anz J Cardiol 1989;64:1387-1389. 2. Sprecher DL, Adamick A, Adams D, Kisslo J. In vitro color flow, pulsed and continuous wave Doppler ultrasound masking of flow by prosthetic valves. .I Am Cdl Cardiol 1987:9:1306-l 310. 3. Nellessen U, Schnittger I, Appleton CP, Masuyama T, Bolger A, F&hell TA, Tye T, Popp RL. Transesophageal 2-dimensional echocardiography and color Doppler flow velocity mapping in the evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses. Circuhion 1988:78:848-855. 4. Van den Brink RBA, Visser CA, Basart DCG, Duren DR, de Jong AP, Dunning AJ. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal color Doppler flow imaging in patients with mechanical prostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:1471-1474. 5. Steward JB, Khandheria BK, Oh JK, Abel MD, Hughes RW Jr, Edwards WD, Nichol BA, Freeman WK, Tajik AJ. Transesophageal echocardiography: technique, anatomic correlations, implementation, and clinical applications. Mayo Clin Proc 1988;63:649-680. 6. Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC, Soto B, Adey CK, Goyal RG, Gatewood RP. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation J987;75:175-183,

ansesophageal Color Flow Doppler and Echocardiographic Features Normal and Regurgitant St. Jude Medical Prostheses in th

Valve Position Mohsin Alam, MD, Jeffrey B. Serwin, MD, Howard S. Rosman, MD, Mita Sheth, MD, Irene Sun, RN, RDMS, Norman A. Silverman, MD, and Sidney Goldstein, MD

T ransthoracic echocardiography and color flow Dop- pler have been shown to be of value in evaluating

regurgitant St. Jude Medical (SJM) prostheses in the aortic valve position.’ Transesophageal echocardiogra- phy and color fiow Doppler show promise in evaluating normal functioning and regurgitant SJM mitral valves.2y3 Recently transesophageal imaging has been shown to be superior to the transthoracic approach in demonstrating prosthetic valve vegetations4 This report describes our transesophageal ultrasound experience with 18 normal

From the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardio- vascular Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan 48202. Manuscript received May 3, 1990; revised manuscript received and accepted May 21, 1990.

functioning, 2 regurgitant and 1 infected SJM prostheses in the aortic valve position.

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogra- phy and colorflow Doppler studies were performed in 21 patients with SJM prostheses in the aortic position. At the time of the transesophageal study, the valves had been in place from I day to 37 months (mean 10 months). Of the 21 transesophageal valve studies, 18 appeared normal and 2 had features of valve regurgita- tion and I was infected. All 3 abnormal valves resulted from bacterial endocarditis. Valve regurgitation and in- fection was substantiated by valve replacement surgery in 2 patients. The prosthetic valve replacement surgery was performed within 7 days of transesophageal study.

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogra- phy and color jlow Doppler studies were performed

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY OCTO5ER 1, 1990