transformation in central europe
DESCRIPTION
Transformation in central europe. Tereza VorlovÁ Jan Hauser Monash European and EU Centre / Charles university, Prague. Central Europe. Europe b efore 1989. Europe t oday. CEE countries before 1989. Not all part of Soviet Union - communist regimes more or less aligned with USSR. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
www.monash.edu
TRANSFORMATION IN CENTRAL EUROPE
TEREZA VORLOVÁJAN HAUSER
MONASH EUROPEAN AND EU CENTRE / CHARLES UNIVERSITY, PRAGUE
www.monash.edu 2
CENTRAL EUROPE
Europe before 1989 Europe today
3www.monash.edu
Not all part of Soviet Union - communist regimes more or less aligned with USSR
CEE COUNTRIES BEFORE 1989
www.monash.edu 4
“COMMUNISM” IN CEEPolitics:
- One party rule- No division of power- No independent courts- No pluralism- No basic freedoms- No free media
Society:
- No civil society - No real trade unions- No prof. organisations- Disinformation
Result? Result? Result?
Economy:
- Centrally planned- No private property- Collective ownership
www.monash.edu 5
40 YEARS OF COMMUNISM: RESULTS
Prague 1968
• Economic underperformance• Political repressions• Social unrest• Numerous uprisings:
• 1956, 1968, 1970, 1981, 1989
www.monash.edu 6
WIND OF CHANGE: 1980S
glasnost – openness
perestroika – restructuring
demokratizatsiia – democratisation
www.monash.edu 7
1989
www.monash.edu 8
WHAT CHANGE AFTER 1989?The Promise of 1989:
- Political transition- Economic transition - Legal - Societal- Change of mindsets (“minds and hearts”)
www.monash.edu 9
WHAT CHANGE AFTER 1989?
Politics: Democratically elected governments, institutions & decision-
making, power-sharing, rule of law: human rights (freedom of speech, religion, media freedoms) government non-interferenceEconomy:
Private ownership allowed, free trade (fewer restrictions) no more economic dependence on authorities: dependence on consumers (demand – supply rule), dualism: public & private sectorsSociety:
Pluralistic society with rights & freedoms, values & rules – most difficult, taking a long time
“There is no transformation without rehabilitation, lustration and restitution.” Vojtěch Cepl, 1995
www.monash.edu 10
ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION: MASS PRIVATIZATIONExample: Coupon privatization in Czech Republic• “Shock Therapy”
• Over 1800 state companies privatized over 4 years• Poor institutional and legal environment
• Results: decreasing GDP, bankruptcy, corruption, tunneling• Asset-stripping instead of investment
• Mass delusion vs. Economic growth and attracting large amounts of FDI
• “It turns out that the rule of law is probably more basic than privatization. Privatization is meaningless if you don’t have the rule of law.” Milton Friedman, 2002
www.monash.edu 11
PRIVATIZATION: WHAT HAPPENED?
Bankruptcy• D
ecreasing GDP, growing unemployment
www.monash.edu 12
INITIAL CHALLENGES• Economic recession
• Corporate governance system that had to develop simultaneously
• Corruption
• Immature banking system
• Capital flight
• Strong reliance on foreign aid and foreign direct investment (FDI) to provide missing capital, which means conditionality and fragility
www.monash.edu 13
INITIAL CHALLENGES• Rising unemployment
(especially significant considering the “absence” of unemployment during communism)
• Living standards plummet
• Poverty and mortality rates increased, fertility rates dropped (lack of funding and history of such welfare problems)
• Inequality increased (amongst the rich and the poor, but also based on age, education, and region)
• Mass emigration due to poverty and internal conflicts
• Populism in politics (playing up to the fears of people without providing strong policy proposals)
www.monash.edu 14
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE COMMUNISTS?• Renamed (Hungary, East Germany)• Dissolved/Disappeared (Poland)• Continued (Czech Rep.)
Czech Rep. regional elections 2012 – overall results
www.monash.edu 15
MID-TERM GOALSMembership in the European Union:
• Democratic• Free market-economy• Stable institutions• Not involved in conflicts• Capacity to implement EU body of law
Membership in International Organisations(thus legal changes):
• Council of Europe • WTO • OECD• NATO
Václav Havel in U.S. Congresshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zplMpbZkEaM
www.monash.edu 16
“RETURN TO EUROPE”Alignment with the EU:
Requirements consistent with CEE’s chosen path
External pressure consolidates changes
All CEE states complied with EU laws by 2004
Central Europe as a power block within EU
www.monash.edu 17
RETURN TO EUROPETransition in Central and Eastern Europe has been difficult
CEE as testing ground for simultaneous introduction of democracy and a neo-liberal market economy
Exact circumstances and outcomes differ widely from country to country
Stability has proven to be a very important factor for a successful economy
The role of democracy is uncertain, though there is a moral commitment to it because of the role of CEE countries in international organisations
It is uncertain how the countries of CEE will fare in the short-term, and what their role will be in an enlarged Europe
www.monash.edu 18
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED?
Successes Challenges remainingCEE = consolidated democracies (by all standards)
- Low trust in key institutions - Politicised key institutions - Parliaments’ fragmentation - Weak political parties - Corruption still a problem
Functioning free marketRemarkable economic growth
- CEE still as Europe’s periphery- Recent crisis: affected CEE
Transition without economic chaos, ‘valley of tears’ & social upheavals
Rapid social changeCohesive citizenry
- Democratic norms still not fully ingrained / accepted
Successful EU membership - Still a catalyst for change- Declining support for EU integration