transforming derp panel: army perspectiveproceedings.ndia.org/jsem2006/wednesday/newsome.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 1 of 7 14 Feb 06
Transforming DERP Panel:Transforming DERP Panel:Army PerspectiveArmy Perspective
Mr. Rick NewsomeOffice of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Environment, Safety and Occupational Health)
March 22, 2006
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 2 of 7 14 Feb 06
TopicsTopics
• Military Munitions Response Program
• Performance-Based Contracting
• Formerly Used Defense Sites Program
• BRAC 2005 & Army Transformation
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 3 of 7 14 Feb 06
Military Munitions Response ProgramMilitary Munitions Response Program
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011
Dol
lars
• Inventory completed as required by Congress• DoD Goals:
– Complete Preliminary Assessments by EOY 2007; Sites Inspections by EOY 2010
• Munitions Response Prioritization Protocol:– Used to assign relative priority; sequencing for
responses– Involves stakeholders in process
• Cross-over of Army IRP to MMRP in POMIRP
MMRP
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 4 of 7 14 Feb 06
MMRP Site InspectionsMMRP Site Inspections
• DoD goal: complete SIs by FY2010– Active Sites SI Schedule (154 total) funded by
FY08– FUDS Program SI Schedule (765 total) with
funding thru FY10 at $25M/year
• Need for State involvement in review of SIs and application of Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 5 of 7 14 Feb 06
What is PBC?What is PBC?• Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) -
mechanism that solicits bids on basis of what RESULTS that you want achieved rather than what ACTIVITIES you want conducted:– Contract for “What,” not “How”
• Characteristics of PBC:– Clearly defined performance expectations and measures
(baseline vs. expected results)– Clearly defined due dates & milestones– Use of incentives for performance– Flexibility in exchange for accountability for results
• Army retains Environmental Liability• Regulators concur with remedy selection and
response complete
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 6 of 7 14 Feb 06
Army PBC ResultsArmy PBC Results
PBC Accomplishments (F01 – FY05)• 36 installation at 541 sites
21%Cost Avoidance (from IGE)34%Cost Avoidance (from CTC)
$478$608$723541Cumulative
Contract Award
IGE ($M)
CTC ($M)
# of Sites
IGE = Independent Government Estimate
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 7 of 7 14 Feb 06
Formerly Used Defense Sites ProgramFormerly Used Defense Sites Program
• Focus on near-term DoD goals:– Complete SIs by FY2010; Achieve Response
Complete or Remedy-in-Place at all hazard Waste sites by 2020
– $18.7B cost-to-complete; largest amongst Services• MMRP CTC - $12.9B• HTRW CTC - $ 3.2B
– Projects inventory requiring action:• IRP site count = 1,123• MMRP site count = 1,177
• FUDS funding:– FY06 appropriation = $254 million– FY07 budget request = $243 million
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 8 of 7 14 Feb 06
FUDS ProgramFUDS Program
• Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan– Applies to Active sites, BRAC, FUDS , and
Compliance Cleanup– Provides goals, objectives, and metrics
• Program Management Plans:– Focus on RIP/RC goal & phase progress– Emphasis on Statewide MAPs
o By end of FY05 36 SMAPs complete/underwayo 7 planned (DC, MD, MT, NH, RI, TN, and VI) in FY06
– Take away … FUDS Program making demonstrative progress, but dependent on funding
FUDS
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 9 of 7 14 Feb 06
Army Force TransformationArmy Force Transformation
IGPBS = Integrated Global Presence & Basing Strategy
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 10 of 7 14 Feb 06
Army BRAC 2005 SnapshotArmy BRAC 2005 Snapshot
76 Installations Touched by BRAC 800+ Individual Actions in BRAC Recommendations
• 53 Installation Realignments• 50 Active Installations• 3 Reserve Garrisons
• 8 Leased Facilities Closed
• 125 New Armed Forces Reserves Centers
• 13 Full Closures• 5 HQ Installations• 3 Chemical Depots• 4 Ammunition Plants• 1 Reserve Garrison
• 211 Guard Closures• 175 Reserve Closures
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 11 of 7 14 Feb 06
BRAC 2005 ProcessBRAC 2005 Process
IntegratesIGPBS
Army Modular ForceInstallation Military Value
Doctrinal EfficienciesJoint Initiatives
Closure Activities
NEPA MILCON
RealignmentClosure
Community Engagement and Reuse Planning
Realigned orClosed
within 6 Yrs
Congress approved BRAC November 2005
Environmental Remediation
Disposed / Transferred ASAP
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 12 of 7 14 Feb 06
Joint and MultiJoint and Multi--ComponentComponent
Ft Knox
Ft Benning
Ft MonroeFt Lee
HoffmanBldgs
Ft Jackson
Ft Eustis
Redstone
Aberdeen Proving Ground
AFNavy
AFNavy
ReserveCenter
Ft L’Wood
BRIGADECOMBAT
TEAM
Drill Sgt
Drill Sgt
CulinaryArts
HumanResourcesCommand
TRADOC
ChaplainsSchools
Ordnance School
Accession CommandCadet Command
ArmorSchool
Munitions &Missiles Center
Transportation School
Integrated Global Presence and Basing Study
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 13 of 7 14 Feb 06
What Does BRAC 2005 Mean to States?What Does BRAC 2005 Mean to States?
• BRAC is different Funding source:– Identify affected installations in your state and adjust
Attachment A and JEP to ensure smooth transition of funds and activities
• Army Program Management shifting for closing installations: – For Cleanup from USAEC to office on Army Staff (BRAC
Division)– For Compliance from Lead organizations to BRACD
• Army approach - cleanup to like reuse:– Local Redevelopment Authority may proposed reuse
which may require more stringent clean up Environmental Services Cooperative Agreements (ESCA)
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 14 of 7 14 Feb 06
Implementing SustainabilityImplementing Sustainability
• Sets course to sustain Army (mission and success) in future
• Requires Army to systematically think and act to integrate mission, ENV, & community
““The Army Strategy for The Army Strategy for the Environment”the Environment”
https://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/default.htmlor
Look at for Army Sustainability display
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 15 of 7 14 Feb 06
Army Sustainability InitiativesArmy Sustainability Initiatives• Developed Sustainable Range or Installation
Environmental Activity Responsibilities Matrix• Chartered HQDA Sustainability Committee • Developed Installation Sustainability Plans with
25 year goals at 12 Installations • Developed Army Strategic Planning Model
Inculcating Sustainability into Strategic Plans at IMA installations
• Developing Army Sustainability Campaign Plan:– Sustainability Website:
(https://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/default.html)– Sustainability Poster– Training Video
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 16 of 7 14 Feb 06
"Sustain the Mission - Secure the Future"
The Cleanup EquationThe Cleanup Equation
Triple Bottom
Line
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 17 of 7 14 Feb 06
Summary
• Army’s cleanup effort is driven by Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan
• Focus on achieving:– Site Response Complete– Completing SIs
• For FUDS program, emphasis on Statewide MAPs
• BRAC 2005 will challenge all to meet Congressional execution deadlines
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 18 of 7 14 Feb 06
BackupBackup
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 19 of 7 14 Feb 06
PBC Proposed FY06 PBC Proposed FY06 Candidates
• Aberdeen Proving Ground (Canal Creek) MD
• Fort Richardson / Haines Terminal, AK
• Badger AAP, WI• Dugway Proving Ground, UT• Fort Bragg, NC• Fort Campbell, KY• Fort Story, Fort Lee and Fort
Eustis, VA• Fort Leonard Wood, MO
• Fort McClellan, AL • Fort Riley, KS• Hawthorne Army Depot, NV• Kansas AAP, KS• Letterkenny AD, PA• Picatinny Arsenal (ARDEC), NJ• Radford, VA• Volunteer AAP, TN• White Sands Missile Range, NM• Remedial Action Operation/
Long Term Monitoring (RA(O)/LTM)
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 20 of 7 14 Feb 06
Scope of FUDS Program by StateScope of FUDS Program by State
NH 11
MA 112
CT 22RI 42
NJ 47
DC 27
DE 11MD 43
OK55
TX218
AR14
LA24
NC 39TN 24
AL28
MS35
GA46
SC31
FL170
NV41 UT
19
CA482 AZ
103NM143
WA69
MT19
ND4
SD33WY
22
WI25ID
20
MN20
OR29
IA13NE
55CO30 KS
73MO28
ME64
VT 6
NY91
PA68
WV10 VA
43
IN17
OH32
IL65
KY 5
MI66
HI68
AK130
•Northern Mariana Islands 19•Palau (PT) 0•Puerto Rico (PR) 25•U.S. Virgin Islands (VI) 6•American Samoa (AS) 8•Guam (GM) 16
Total Number of Properties Requiring Response Action: 2,965Data: FY05 Defense ENV Program Annual Report to Congress
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 21 of 7 14 Feb 06
BRAC 2005 (Major Closures)
Reserves • Charles E. Kelly Spt Ctr, PA• Vancouver Barracks, WA
• Lease – Army Judge Advocate General Agency, VA
• Lease – Crystal City Complex, VA • Lease – Headquarters Army Test and Evaluation Command, VA
• Lease – Hoffman Building, VA • Lease – Rosslyn Complex, VA • Lease – Army Personnel Center, MO
• Ft Gillem, GA • Ft McPherson, GA • Ft Monmouth, NJ • Ft Monroe, VA • Walter Reed Army Medical Center, DC• Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, KS • Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant, TX • Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant, MS • Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant, CA • Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR • Deseret Chemical Plant, UT • Newport Chemical Depot, IN • US Army Garrison – Selfridge, MI
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 22 of 7 14 Feb 06
BRAC 2005 (Major Re-alignments)
• Fort Knox, KY• Fort Jackson, SC
• Watervliet Arsenal, NY• Fort Huachuca, AZ• Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA• Fort Hood, TX• Soldier Systems Center, Natick, MA• Fort Eustis, VA• Sierra Army Depot, CA• Fort Dix, NJ• Rock Island Arsenal, IL• Fort Campbell, KY• Redstone Arsenal, AL• Fort Buchanan, PR• Lima Tank Plant, OH• Fort Bragg, NC• Fort Wainwright, AK• Fort Bliss, TX• Fort Sill, OK• Fort Benning, GA• Fort Sam Houston, TX• Fort Belvoir, VA• Fort Rucker, AL• Detroit Arsenal, MI• Fort Richardson, AK• Corpus Christi Army Depot, TX• Fort McCoy, WI• Bailey’s Crossroads Lease Site, VA• Fort Lewis, WA• Anniston Army Depot, AL• Fort Leonard Wood, MO• Adelphi Laboratory, MD• Fort Lee, VA• Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 23 of 7 14 Feb 06
RABS for BRAC 2005
Reserves Charles E. Kelly Spt Ctr - NOVancouver Barracks – NO
Property Transfer RealignmentsRed River Army Depot – YESWatervliet Arsenal - NO
Ft Gillem - NO Ft McPherson – NO Ft Monmouth - YESFt Monroe - NO Walter Reed Med Ctr - NO Kansas AAAP – NO Lone Star AAP – NOMississippi AAP – NO Riverbank AAP – NO Umatilla Chemical Depot - YESDeseret Chemical Depot - YESNewport Chemical Depot - YESArmy Garrison Selfridge – NO
JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 24 of 7 14 Feb 06
Installation Restoration ProgramInstallation Restoration Program
• Focus on DoD goals of Remedy-in-Place/ Response Complete targets
• Efficiency initiatives:– Performance Based contracting focusing on cost
and time savings• Environmental liabilities:
– Chief Financial Officer Act of 1990 requires federal agencies to report liabilities
– Supporting documentation and supervisory controls are key
– Real property reconciliation