translating genomic research into public health · pdf filetranslating genomic research into...
TRANSCRIPT
Translating Genomic Research into Public Health Applications
April 7, 2010
Debra DuquetteGenetic Alliance
Posted in the Resource Repository at:http://www.resourcerepository.org/documents/1934/translatinggenomicresearchintopublichealthapplications/
Genomics Translation for Public Health Webinar
April 9, 2010
Debra Duquette, MS, CGC Genomics Coordinator
Michigan Department of Community Health
[email protected] 517-335-8286
Promise of Genomics for Public Health Practice
Increase understanding of underlying genetic susceptibility to common chronic diseases and infections
Awareness of genomic risk may be a motivating factor for behavior change and screening uptake
Family-centered approaches to risk reduction may be more effective and have longer impact
Cross-cutting topic across many public health disciplines
Decrease early mortality of common chronic diseases Earlier detection of at-risk populations Target interventions to high-risk
populations Improve screening, diagnosis and
treatment
“DNA nebula” discovered 80 light years away
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/03/0317_060317_dna_nebula.html
Poll Question: What do you think is the greatest barrier to genomics translation for public health practice?
A) Lack of time, staff and funding B) Lack of genomic competency C) Lack of interest in genomics relevance D) Lack of evidence that genomics improves
health outcomes
Barriers to Genomics in Public Health Practice
Lack of: Time Staff Funding Population-based Genomic Data Genomic Competency Genomic Literacy Interest and Knowledge of
Genomics Relevance Evidence-base for Genomic
Applications Proven Genomics Applications
Leading to Improved Health Outcomes
Other Difficulties: Other Public Health Priorities Staying Abreast of Current
Genomics Developments Commercialization of Genomic
Tests Access to Services and
Technologies Health Disparities Financing/Reimbursement for
Genomic Services and Tests
Overcoming Barriers to Genomics Translation
Integrate into Programs Build Upon Resources Enhance Data Sources Add to Population-Based Surveys GAPPNet!
Integrating into Existing Programs: Healthy People 2020 (HP 2020)
Started in 1979 10-year national objectives for
promoting health and preventing disease
HP 2020 marks first time for genomics objectives
Encourage collaborations across sectors, guide individuals toward making informed health decisions, and measure the impact of prevention activities
Works to achieve increased quality and years of healthy life and the elimination of health disparities.
http://www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020/
Integrating into Existing Programs: Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan for Michigan 2009-2015 Managing a Course for Excellence in Michigan
Three cross-cutting goals: Health Disparities Access to Care Emerging Science and Technology
New Genomics Goal:
Increase availability of cancer-related genetic information to the Michigan public and decrease barriers to risk-appropriate services
http://michigancancer.org/
Integrating into Existing Programs: Michigan Cancer Consortium (MCC) Special Project Objective
By 2011, expand public knowledge about the impact of genetics on cancer risk and management (breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancers)
– Disseminates existing family history resources on website
– Includes recently recorded radio public service announcements and radio interviews
– Includes recently developed family history poster by MCC and American Cancer Society
http://michigancancer.org
Building Upon Existing Resources: US Surgeon General Tool for Family Health History
http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/
US Surgeon General declared Thanksgiving to be National Family History Day since 2004
Revised “My Family Health Portrait” allows users to organize family history and share with others
Family history is traditional core element of clinical care
Use of family history precedes evidence-based methods
Evidence base supporting family history of chronic diseases in primary care is weak
Additional studies needed!
Developed and distributed since November 2004
16 issues created and disseminated Sent via e-mail to all Michigan
libraries, genetics clinics, chronic disease partners, and others
Focus on awareness of disease or risk factor month
• Number of hits to newsletters ~400-800/month
• Recent Survey indicated: - 92% said newsletters were
informative or very informative
- 15% further disseminated to 50 or more people www.michigan.gov/genomics
Building Upon Existing Resources: MDCH Family History and Your Health Newsletters
Using Existing Data Sources and Surveys
Data Sources of Genomics Relevance – Vital records data
Surveillance of early mortality of chronic diseases – Cancer registry data
Surveillance of early onset cases, males with breast cancer, multiple primaries, site-specific factors
Examples of Population-Based Surveys – Behavioral Risk Factor Survey
State-based system of health surveys that collects information on health risk behaviors, preventive health practices, and health care access primarily related to chronic disease and injury.
– PRAMS collects state-specific, population-based data on maternal attitudes
and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy
Sudden Cardiac Death of the Young (SCDY)
Death occurring out-of-hospital or in the emergency room or as “dead on arrival” with an underlying cause of death reported as a cardiac disease
Variably defined as < 30, < 35, < 40 years of age Especially tragic event; often high-profile, associated with young
athletes A potentially preventable condition, due to the heritable nature of
certain cardiac disorders – More likely to have genetic determinants than similar conditions in older persons – Immediate family members of SCDY victims may be at increased risk of sudden death – Family history is the greatest risk factor
To learn more about Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young in Michigan, please visit: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/SCDYReportfinalJan09_269478_7.pdf
Using Existing Data Sources: Descriptive Statistics and Mortality Rates for SCDY in Michigan
Using Existing Population-Based Surveys: Michigan BRFS Family History of SCDY
• 2,856 Michigan adults were asked about family history of SCDY in 2007
• 6.3% have a family history of SCDY • 26.2% with multiple relatives • 35.5% with first degree relative
• Significantly more blacks (11.2%) than whites (5.4%) reported family history of SCDY
BRFS SCDY Family History Data
For listing of state-added BRFS questions, please visit: http://depts.washington.edu/cgph/pdf/Compiled_Genomics_Questions_BRFSS.pdf
Staying Abreast of Current Genomics Developments: Resources
Genomics & Health Weekly Update http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/update/current.htm
Summer Institute at University of Washington
http://depts.washington.edu/cgph/summinst_main.htm
4th National Public Health Genomics Conference
https://www.cmpinc.net/2010PHGConference/savethedate.aspx
Importance of GAPPNet to Public Health Professionals
Identify needs for public health professionals and work to fill these ‘gaps’
Create a safety ‘net’ to share successes and lessons learned
Please join GAPPNet
Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.
--Henry Ford
Thank you to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Office of Public Health Genomics for funding this work through Cooperative Agreement #U58/CCU522826 and #5U38GD000054