transportation planning analysis unitpnrec 2006 transportation modeling in oregon: overview of odot...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Transportation Modeling in Oregon:Transportation Modeling in Oregon:Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated
ModelModel
Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Conference Becky Knudson
ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis UnitMay 11th, 2006
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
OverviewOverview
• Intro• Description of Statewide Model• Model Applications• Recap and Questions
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
IntroductionIntroduction Transportation modeling in Oregon is a
collaborative effort among many jurisdictions and public agencies– 1994 ODOT started the Statewide Model
Improvement Program, established a steering committee
– Mission to coordinate modeling efforts of state, regional and local agencies, promote development and use of state-of-the-art transportation modeling in Oregon
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Introduction cont’dIntroduction cont’d
• Program was needed because prevalent modeling methods:– Could not provide information needed to
meet state and federal mandates
– Or answer questions being asked by the public and policy-makers
• Decision-makers needed:– Estimates of effects of policies
– Tools to measure performance
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Statewide Statewide ModelModel
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Statewide Model: What is it?Statewide Model: What is it?
• Integrated model linking the economy, land use, and transportation elements across state
• Statewide model based on production activity - inputs and outputs, and commodity flow
• Simulates land use and travel behavior mathematically using several computer programs
• Provides a dynamic, price sensitive representation of state economic activity
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Statewide Model: How is it Useful?Statewide Model: How is it Useful?
• Provides objective and unbiased comparison between alternative policies
• Reveals trade-offs between different policies
• Reveals synergies gained by combining policies in different ways
• Integrated analysis does not dictate policy, it provides information on how policies will likely play out
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Information ProducedInformation Produced
• Statewide model designed to reveal differences in terms of forecast magnitude and direction
• Forecast change in employment, trips, vehicle-miles-of-travel, economic production levels
• NOT designed to predict outcomes, forecast values, or prescribe solutions
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Using the Statewide Model Using the Statewide Model We Have Learned:We Have Learned:
• The types of transportation improvements and where they are made affects where jobs and people locate
• Different tax structures affect where firms locate and where workers live
• The supply of land affects the price of land, in turn affecting where firms and households locate.
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Application Example: Application Example: Bridge Limitations Study 2002Bridge Limitations Study 2002
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
The ProblemThe Problem
• Over 500 Oregon bridges identified as cracking 2001– Nearly 25% of Oregon bridges are beyond their 50
year expected life
• Cost to repair or replace bridges $4.7 billion
• Statewide Model used to evaluate alternative bridge investment strategies
• Final Investment strategy based on – Bridge costs– Economic costs– Community & regional Impacts
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Alternative SolutionsAlternative Solutions
• No additional bridge investment would lead to– More trucks on road– Higher maintenance & preservation costs– Less future employment growth from higher
transport costs
• Fix interstate bridges:– Ignores routes connecting to interstate system– Benefits state economy, but harms coastal and
central region of state
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Best Bridge StrategyBest Bridge Strategy
• One deficient bridge impedes the entire corridor, ODOT shifted from initial “worst-first” strategy to corridor approach
• Improve routes parallel to the interstates to accommodate detoured heavy freight loads
• The order in which roads are opened to heavy loads affects regional economy and livability
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
ODOT RecommendationODOT Recommendation
• $2.5B, initial 10-year strategy to $4.7B bridge problem
• Address detour routes before interstate construction
• Over 90 percent of the statewide economic benefit of repairing all bridges gained for nearly half the cost
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
STAGE 1STAGE 1$92M, 48 bridges$92M, 48 bridges
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
STAGE STAGE 22
$657M, 161 bridges$657M, 161 bridges
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
STAGE STAGE 33
$567M, 147 bridges$567M, 147 bridges
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
STAGE STAGE 44
$234M, 94 bridges$234M, 94 bridges
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
STAGE STAGE 55
$116M, 46 bridges$116M, 46 bridges
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Application Example: Application Example: Central Oregon Central Oregon
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
LegislativeLegislative Directive: Study Directive: Study New Freeway in Eastern New Freeway in Eastern
OregonOregonThe model was The model was used to evaluate used to evaluate the potential for a the potential for a new freeway to new freeway to divert divert development and development and traffic from traffic from Western Oregon Western Oregon to Central and to Central and Eastern Oregon.Eastern Oregon.
PortlandPortland
SalemSalem
EugeneEugene BendBend
PendletonPendleton
US 395US 395
US 97US 97
PortlandPortland
SalemSalem
EugeneEugene BendBend
PendletonPendleton
US 395US 395
US 97US 97
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Application Example: Application Example: Newberg-Dundee Bypass Newberg-Dundee Bypass
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
The model was used to examine the potential effects of a bypass on growth of population, jobs and travel.
Analysis was part of an Environmental Impact Study for the proposed bypass which resides on a major recreation route and commuter-shed of Portland
Newberg-Dundee: Highway Bypass Newberg-Dundee: Highway Bypass Induced Growth AnalysisInduced Growth Analysis
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
Modeling/Analysis FindingsModeling/Analysis Findings
• A bypass:– Stimulates economic growth in McMinnville
– Supports greater travel for all purposes
– Has minimal effects on smaller communities in Yamhill County
• Commuter effects vary with a bypass:– Increased commuting by residents in McMinnville vicinity
to Portland
– Increased share of Newberg area commuters to McMinnville (lower share to Portland)
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
RecapRecap
• Integrated analysis blends the features of land use, transportation and economic activity together to represent the interactions and reveal net effects of change
• Statewide model based on production activity, commodity flow, inputs and outputs
• Valuable tool for policy makers to evaluate alternative policy choices.
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit PNREC 2006
QuestionsQuestions
Becky Knudson
Senior Transportation Analyst
Transportation Planning Analysis Unit
555 13th St NE, Suite 2
Salem, OR. 97301
(503) 986-4113