treatment episode data set admissions (teds-a), 2014 · 1 subs tance abuse and me nal h e alh serv...

91
Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Codebook

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Codebook

Page 2: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

1

Acknowledgements

This data file was prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

(SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), by Synectics for Management

Decisions, Inc. (Synectics), Arlington, Virginia.

Terms of Use These data are distributed under the following terms of use. By continuing past this page, you

signify your agreement to comply with the requirements as stated below:

Privacy of Study Respondents Any intentional identification of a study respondent (whether an individual or an organization) or

unauthorized disclosure of identifiable information violates the pledge given to the providers of

the information. Disclosure of identifiable information may also be punishable under federal law.

Therefore, users of data agree:

• To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for reidentification

of specific study respondents.

• To make no use of the identity of any study respondents discovered inadvertently and to

report any such discovery to SAMHSA ([email protected]).

Public Domain Notice

All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied

without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this

publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization

of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Page 3: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

2

Data Citation

Data users agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any of the publications that

use these public use SAMHSA data.

Authors of publications that use these data are required to send citations of their published works to

SAMHSA for inclusion in a database of related publications ([email protected])

Disclaimer

Data users acknowledge that SAMHSA and SMDI (Synectics) will bear no responsibility for use

of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations

If SAMHSA or SMDI determines that this “Terms of Use” agreement has been violated, then

possible sanctions could include:

• Report of the violation to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or

Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution.

• If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, then report of the violation

may be made to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections.

• Report of the violation of federal law to the United States Attorney General for possible

prosecution.

• Court awarded payments of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the

breach of confidential data.

Page 4: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

3

TREATMENT EPISODE DATA SET – ADMISSIONS CODEBOOK, 2014

Introduction

This codebook is for the Treatment Episode Data Set – Admissions (TEDS-A) for admissions to

substance abuse treatment occurring in 2014. TEDS-A provides demographic and substance

abuse characteristics of admissions to alcohol or drug treatment in facilities that report to

individual state administrative data systems.

The TEDS system is comprised of two major components, the Admissions Data Set and the

Discharges Data Set (TEDS-D). The TEDS-Admissions (TEDS-A) file is an established

program; data were first reported for TEDS-A in 1992. The TEDS-D began more recently, with

the first data reported in 2000. TEDS includes treatment data that are routinely collected by

states to monitor their individual substance abuse treatment systems. Selected data items from

the individual state data files are converted to a standardized format that is consistent across

states. These standardized data constitute TEDS.

The TEDS-A is comprised of a Minimum Data Set collected by all states, and a Supplemental

Data Set collected by some states. The Minimum Data Set consists of 19 items that include:

• Demographic information;

• Primary, secondary, and tertiary substances used by the subject, and their route of

administration, frequency of use, and age at first use;

• Source of referral to treatment;

• Number of prior treatment episodes; and

• Service type, including planned use of medication-assisted (i.e., with methadone or

buprenorphine) opioid therapy.

The 15 Supplemental Data Set items include psychiatric, social, and economic measures.

A full list of the variables can be viewed in the Variable Information and Frequency sections of

this codebook.

This codebook provides background and descriptive information for the TEDS-A public-use

files, limitations of the data, and frequencies. References are available detailing the data

collected in each state with the TEDS data elements, including state-by-state descriptions of

exceptions or anomalies in reporting practices. Users may refer to the TEDS Crosswalks

available from SAMHSA. The crosswalks are frequently updated as new information becomes

available.

Since 1992, the Office of Applied Studies (OAS) of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health

Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

has funded and been responsible for TEDS. It coordinates and manages the collection of TEDS

data from the states. In 2010, the OAS was renamed to the Center for Behavioral Health

Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ) and then to Behavioral Health Services

Information

Page 5: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

4

System (BHSIS). The unit of analysis is treatment admissions to state-licensed or certified

substance abuse treatment centers that receive federal public funding.

Descriptive and analytical reports from TEDS are developed by BHSIS to provide national and

state-level data on the number and types of clients treated and the characteristics of facilities

providing services.

Data Collection

The “Treatment Episode Data Set State Instruction Manual – Admissions Data” is available from the

SAMHSA Web site and provides complete instructions on how the TEDS-A data are processed

and submitted by the states.

Confidentiality Protection

Several measures were taken to protect the confidentiality of the TEDS-A records. Variables that

potentially identify an individual in their raw form underwent routine top- or bottom-coding in

order to prevent high and low codes from distinguishing a respondent’s record. For example,

AGE as a continuous variable has the potential to identify both the youngest and oldest

participants in a public release file. Hence, AGE was recoded into 11 categories for the public-

use file to reduce disclosure risk. The lowest category for age combines the ages of 12-14.

Similarly, ages of 55 and older were top-coded. All the variables recoded are documented in

Appendix B.

Disclosure analysis is used to identify records that remained unique after routine recoding

measures were taken to protect confidentiality. Disclosure analysis is used to discern

combinations of indirect identifiers that potentially link an individual to a record. Particular

attention was given to the analytic importance of geographic data and of subgroup populations.

Consequently, data swapping was applied to the TEDS in order to satisfy stringent

confidentiality standards while preserving the analytic value of the public-use file.

The original location of a record in TEDS-A cannot be known for certain due to the use of data

swapping. This method has several benefits over other disclosure protection options: (1) the

overall impact to the data is typically small; (2) nearly all of the data are left intact; (3) data for

special populations (e.g., minorities, pregnant women) are no more impacted than other data;

(4) the procedures typically do not affect any analytic uses of the file; and (5) the procedures

allow greater detail to remain on the public use file (e.g., the original ethnicity codes).

Universe

The universe for TEDS-A is admissions in calendar year 2014 that were received and processed

through February 1, 2016.

Page 6: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

5

Coverage

The TEDS attempts to include all admissions to providers receiving public funding. Because

each state or jurisdiction decides the TEDS eligibility of a provider, there is no independent

check on the actual sources of funding. Although SAMHSA requests submission of TEDS data

on all admissions to any publicly funded treatment facility, reporting in some state agencies is

structured so that only clients treated with public funds are included in the TEDS. The number

of clients in these facilities whose treatment is not publicly funded is unknown.1

Data Limitations

The TEDS, while comprising a significant proportion of all admissions to substance abuse

treatment, does not include all such admissions. The TEDS is a compilation of facility data from

state administrative systems. The scope of facilities included in the TEDS is affected by

differences in state licensure, certification, accreditation, and disbursement of public funds. For

example, some state substance abuse agencies regulate private facilities and individual

practitioners, while others do not. In some states, hospital-based substance abuse treatment

facilities are not licensed through the state substance abuse agency. Some state substance abuse

agencies track treatment in correctional facilities (state prisons and local jails), while others do

not.

In general, facilities reporting TEDS data receive state alcohol and/or drug agency funds

(including Federal Block Grant funds) for the provision of alcohol and/or drug treatment

services. Most states are able to report all admissions to all eligible facilities, although some

report only admissions financed by public funds. States may report data from facilities that do

not receive public funds, but generally do not because of the difficulty in obtaining data from

these facilities. The TEDS generally does not include data on facilities operated by federal

agencies, including the Bureau of Prisons, the Department of Defense, and the Department of

Veterans Affairs. However, some facilities operated by the Indian Health Service are included.

The primary goal of TEDS is to monitor the characteristics of treatment episodes for substance

abusers. Implicit in the concept of treatment is a planned, continuing treatment regimen. Thus,

the TEDS does not include early intervention programs; these are considered to be prevention

programs. Crisis intervention facilities such as sobering-up stations and hospital emergency

departments are not included in the TEDS.

The TEDS is a large and powerful data set. Like all data sets, however, care must be taken that

interpretation does not extend beyond the limitations of the data. Limitations fall into two broad

1

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment

Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services.

DASIS Series: S-7, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 99-3324, Rockville, MD, 1999, 115.

Page 7: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

6

categories: those related to the scope of the data collection system, and those related to the

difficulties of aggregating data from highly diverse state data collection systems.2

Limitations to be kept in mind while analyzing TEDS data include:

• The number and client mix of TEDS records depends, to some extent, on external factors

- including the availability of public funds. In states with higher funding levels, a larger

percentage of the substance abusing population may be admitted to treatment, including

the less severely impaired and the less economically disadvantaged.

• The primary, secondary, and tertiary substances of abuse reported to the TEDS are those

substances that led to the treatment episode, and not necessarily a complete enumeration

of all drugs used at the time of admission.

• The way an admission is defined may vary from state to state such that the absolute

number of admissions is not a valid measure for comparing states.

• States continually review the quality of their data processing. As systematic errors are

identified, revisions may be enacted in historical TEDS data files. While this system

improves the data set over time, reported historical statistics may change slightly from

year to year.

• States vary in the extent to which coercion plays a role in referral to treatment. This

variation derives from criminal justice practices and differing concentrations of abuser

subpopulations.

• Public funding constraints may direct states to selectively target special populations, for

example, pregnant women or adolescents.

• TEDS includes treatment admissions and in many states the files may include multiple

admissions for the same client. Therefore, any statistics derived from the data will

represent admissions, not clients. It is possible for clients to have multiple initial

admissions within a state and even within providers that have multiple treatment sites

within the state. A few states uniquely identify clients at the state-level and several more

states are attempting to achieve this level of client identification. The TEDS provides a

good national snapshot of what is seen at admission to treatment, but is currently unable

to follow individual clients through a sequence of treatment episodes.

• The TEDS distinguishes between "transfer admissions" and "initial admissions."

Transfer admissions include clients transferred for distinct services within an episode of

treatment. Only initial admissions are included in the public use files.

2

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment

Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2005. Discharges from Substance Abuse Treatment Services. DASIS Series: S-

41, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 08-4312, Rockville, MD, 1999, 6.

Page 8: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

7

• Some states have no Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) that provide medication-assisted

therapy using methadone and/or buprenorphine. See the TEDS state-by-state crosswalk

for information regarding data collected by each state.

Created Variables

The TEDS files contain several variables created from the original variables submitted by the

states. For example, a variable was created to indicate whether each drug was included as a

primary, secondary, or tertiary drug of abuse. These are called flag variables and labeled

according to the drug, such as alcflg for alcohol flag variable, cokeflg for cocaine flag, etc.

A variable that facilitates comparison of each state to all other states can be easily created. These

created variables are referred to as geographic state indicator variables and can be labeled

according to state name such as AKSTATE for Alaska and ALSTATE for Alabama. These

variables are useful for examining characteristics of treatment in one state compared to the rest

of the nation. The state indicator variables are not included in the downloadable data files for

TEDS because they approximately double the size of the files, which are large at the outset due

to the number of TEDS records. Therefore, sample SPSS programming syntax is provided below

in order to create and append the state indicator variable to downloaded files:

* Compute TEDS state indicator for Alaska (STFIPS=2).

do if (STFIPS eq 2).

compute AKSTATE=1.

else.

compute AKSTATE=2.

end if.

variable labels AKSTATE "ALASKA STATE INDICATOR".

value labels AKSTATE 1 "ALASKA" 2 "ALL OTHER STATES".

format AKSTATE (f1.0).

Contents of Public-Use Files The TEDS public use file contains Minimum, Supplemental, and Additional data for 49 states

plus Puerto Rico and Washington DC. South Carolina did not report usable data for the year

2014.

The TEDS Admissions public-use files are provided in SAS System, SPSS System, Stata System,

R System and ASCII comma-delimited formats. Supplemental files containing formats are

available for the SAS System files. A separate codebook is provided for each year’s data file.

Page 9: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

8

The number of observations and variables for 2014 are as follows:

Number of observations: 1,614,358

Number of variables: 62

User Responsibility Users are reminded that the data are to be used solely for statistical analysis and reporting

of aggregated information and not for investigation or identification of specific individuals

or organizations.

Publications

The Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality has other published TEDS reports on the

DASIS Web site.

Page 10: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CASEID: CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

Program generated case (record) identifier.

Variable type: Numeric

Page 11: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

YEAR: YEAR OF ADMISSIONYEAR: YEAR OF ADMISSION

Year of client's admission to substance abuse treatment.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

2014 2014 1,614,358 100%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 2014• Maximum: 2014

Width: 4; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 12: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

AGE: AGE (RECODED)AGE: AGE (RECODED)

Calculated from date of birth and date of admission then categorized.

Note: Records of clients aged 11 years old and younger or are unknown are no longer included in TEDS.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

2 12-14 13,109 0.8%

3 15-17 64,909 4.0%

4 18-20 76,007 4.7%

5 21-24 192,680 11.9%

6 25-29 277,151 17.2%

7 30-34 243,161 15.1%

8 35-39 175,473 10.9%

9 40-44 151,703 9.4%

10 45-49 153,810 9.5%

11 50-54 137,940 8.5%

12 55 AND OVER 128,415 8.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 2• Maximum: 12

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 13: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

GENDER: SEXGENDER: SEX

Identifies client's gender.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 MALE 1,072,049 66.4%

2 FEMALE 541,914 33.6%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 395 0.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 14: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

RACE: RACERACE: RACE

Specifies the client's race:

• ALASKA NATIVE (ALEUT, ESKIMO, INDIAN): Origins in any of the original people of Alaska.

• AMERICAN INDIAN (OTHER THAN ALASKA NATIVE): Origins in any of the original people of North America andSouth America (including Central America) and who maintain cultural identification through tribal affiliation or communityattachment.

• ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER: Origins in any of the original people of the Far East, the Indian subcontinent,Southeast Asia, or the Pacific Islands.

• BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN: Origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.

• WHITE: Origins in any of the original people of Europe, North Africa, or the Middle East.

• ASIAN: Origins in any of the original people of the Far East, the Indian subcontinent, or Southeast Asia, including forexample, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

• OTHER SINGLE RACE: Use this category for instances in which the client is not classified in any category above orwhose origin group, because of area custom, is regarded as a racial class distinct from the above categories. (Do notuse this category for clients indicating multiple races.)

• TWO OR MORE RACES: Use this code when the state data system allows multiple race selection and more thanone race is indicated.

• NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: Origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam,Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

Guidelines: If the state does not distinguish between American Indian and Alaska Native, code both as 02, AmericanIndian. States that can separate 'Asian' and 'Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander' should use codes 13 and 23for those categories. States that cannot make the separation should use the combined code 03 until the separationbecomes possible. Once a state begins using codes 13 and 23, code 03 should no longer be used by that state.States are asked to convert to the new categories when possible.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 ALASKA NATIVE (ALEUT, ESKIMO, INDIAN) 4,331 0.3%

2 AMERICAN INDIAN (OTHER THAN ALASKA NATIVE) 38,292 2.4%

3 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 1,588 0.1%

4 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 290,205 18.0%

5 WHITE 1,067,858 66.1%

13 ASIAN 10,463 0.6%

20 OTHER SINGLE RACE 132,129 8.2%

21 TWO OR MORE RACES 26,394 1.6%

23 NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER 7,186 0.4%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 35,912 2.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 23

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 15: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ETHNIC: ETHNICITY (HISPANIC ORIGIN)ETHNIC: ETHNICITY (HISPANIC ORIGIN)

Specifies client's specific Hispanic origin, if applicable.

• PUERTO RICAN: Of Puerto Rican origin, regardless of race.

• MEXICAN: Of Mexican origin, regardless of race.

• CUBAN: Of Cuban origin, regardless of race.

• OTHER SPECIFIC HISPANIC: Of known Central or South American or any other Spanish cultural origin (includingSpain), other than Puerto Rican, Mexican, or Cuban, regardless of race.

• NOT OF HISPANIC ORIGIN:

• HISPANIC, SPECIFIC ORIGIN NOT SPECIFIED: Of Hispanic origin, but specific origin not known or not specified.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 PUERTO RICAN 64,782 4.0%

2 MEXICAN 81,706 5.1%

3 CUBAN 3,509 0.2%

4 OTHER SPECIFIC HISPANIC 47,362 2.9%

5 NOT OF HISPANIC ORIGIN 1,347,595 83.5%

6 HISPANIC, SPECIFIC ORIGIN NOT SPECIFIED 48,584 3.0%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 20,820 1.3%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 6

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 16: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

MARSTAT: MARITAL STATUSMARSTAT: MARITAL STATUS

Describes the client's marital status. The following categories are compatible with the U.S. Census.

• NEVER MARRIED: Includes clients whose only marriage was annulled.

• NOW MARRIED: Includes those living together as married.

• SEPARATED: Includes those separated legally or otherwise absent from spouse because of marital discord.

• DIVORCED, WIDOWED

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NEVER MARRIED 834,666 51.7%

2 NOW MARRIED 174,802 10.8%

3 SEPARATED 71,652 4.4%

4 DIVORCED, WIDOWED 199,110 12.3%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 334,128 20.7%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 4

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 17: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

EDUC: EDUCATIONEDUC: EDUCATION

Specifies the highest school grade (number of school years) completed by the client.

Guidelines: States that use specific categories for designating education level should map their categories to a logical'number of years of school completed.' The mapping should be recorded in the State Crosswalk. For example, a statecategory of 'Associate Degree' should be mapped to 14; 'Bachelor Degree' would be mapped to 16, etc.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 8 YEARS OR LESS 109,247 6.8%

2 9-11 369,462 22.9%

3 12 682,936 42.3%

4 13-15 303,364 18.8%

5 16 OR MORE 85,582 5.3%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 63,767 3.9%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 5

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 18: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

EMPLOY: EMPLOYMENT STATUSEMPLOY: EMPLOYMENT STATUS

Designates the client's employment status at the time of admission or transfer:

• FULL TIME: Working 35 hours or more each week; including active duty members of the uniformed services.

• PART TIME: Working fewer than 35 hours each week.

• UNEMPLOYED: Looking for work during the past 30 days or on layoff from a job.

• NOT IN LABOR FORCE: Not looking for work during the past 30 days or a student, homemaker, disabled, retired,or an inmate of an institution. Clients in this category are further defined in the Supplemental Data Set item 'DetailedNot in Labor Force' (DETNLF).

Guidelines: Seasonal workers are coded in this category based on their employment status at time of admission. Forexample, if they are employed full time at the time of admission, they are coded as 01. If they are not in labor force attime of admission, they are coded 04.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 FULL TIME 251,362 15.6%

2 PART TIME 122,325 7.6%

3 UNEMPLOYED 613,132 38.0%

4 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 604,332 37.4%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 23,207 1.4%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 4

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 19: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

DETNLF: DETAILED 'NOT IN LABOR FORCE' CATEGORYDETNLF: DETAILED 'NOT IN LABOR FORCE' CATEGORY

This field gives more detailed information about those clients who are coded as 'not in the labor force' in the MinimumData Set field for 'Employment Status' (EMPLOY).

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 HOMEMAKER 14,982 0.9%

2 STUDENT 61,936 3.8%

3 RETIRED, DISABLED 133,965 8.3%

5 INMATE OF INSTITUTION 29,000 1.8%

6 OTHER 260,345 16.1%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,114,130 69.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 6

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 20: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

PREG: PREGNANT AT TIME OF ADMISSIONPREG: PREGNANT AT TIME OF ADMISSION

Specifies whether the client was pregnant at the time of admission.

Guidelines: All male respondents were recoded to missing for this variable due to the item being not applicable.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 YES 21,294 1.3%

2 NO 490,149 30.4%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,102,915 68.3%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 21: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

VET: VETERAN STATUSVET: VETERAN STATUS

Specifies whether the client has served in the uniformed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard,Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Coast and Geodetic Survey, etc).

Guidelines: A veteran is a person 16 years or over who has served (even for a short time), but is not now serving, onactive duty in the US Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, or Commissioned Corps of the US Public HealthService or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or who served as a Merchant Marine seaman duringWorld War II. Persons who served in the National Guard or Military Reserves are classified as veterans only if theywere ever called or ordered to active duty, not counting the 4-6 months for initial training or yearly summer camps.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 YES 47,529 2.9%

2 NO 1,446,414 89.6%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 120,415 7.5%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 22: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

LIVARAG: LIVING ARRANGEMENTLIVARAG: LIVING ARRANGEMENT

Specifies whether the client is homeless, living with parents, living in a supervised setting, or living independently on hisor her own.

• HOMELESS: Clients with no fixed address; includes shelters.

• DEPENDENT LIVING: Clients living in a supervised setting such as a residential institution, halfway house or grouphome, and children (under age 18) living with parents, relatives, or guardians or in foster care.

• INDEPENDENT LIVING: Clients living alone or with others without supervision. Includes adult children (age 18 orover) living with parents.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 HOMELESS 233,410 14.5%

2 DEPENDENT LIVING 300,362 18.6%

3 INDEPENDENT LIVING 1,044,534 64.7%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 36,052 2.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 3

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 23: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

PRIMINC: SOURCE OF INCOME/SUPPORTPRIMINC: SOURCE OF INCOME/SUPPORT

Identifies the client's principal source of financial support. For children under 18, this field indicates the parent'sprimary source of income/support.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 WAGES/SALARY 281,943 17.5%

2 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 96,762 6.0%

3 RETIREMENT/PENSION, DISABILITY 67,402 4.2%

20 OTHER 194,378 12.0%

21 NONE 363,406 22.5%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 610,467 37.8%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 21

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 24: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ARRESTS: NUMBER OF ARRESTS IN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO ADMISSIONARRESTS: NUMBER OF ARRESTS IN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO ADMISSION

The number of arrests in the 30 days preceding the date of admission to treatment services.

Guidelines: This item is intended to capture the number of times the client was arrested for any cause during the 30days preceding the date of admission to treatment. Any formal arrest is to be counted regardless of whetherincarceration or conviction resulted and regardless of the status of the arrest proceedings at the time of admission.

Note: Data began being collected for arrests starting in 2008. Data on arrests is not available prior to that.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 NONE 1,376,253 85.3%

1 ONCE 108,760 6.7%

2 2 OR MORE TIMES 17,651 1.1%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 111,694 6.9%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 2

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 25: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

STFIPS: CENSUS STATE FIPS CODESTFIPS: CENSUS STATE FIPS CODE

State FIPS codes consistent with those used by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 ALABAMA 9,539 0.6%

2 ALASKA 6,346 0.4%

4 ARIZONA 22,050 1.4%

5 ARKANSAS 8,744 0.5%

6 CALIFORNIA 158,434 9.8%

8 COLORADO 89,594 5.5%

9 CONNECTICUT 67,129 4.2%

10 DELAWARE 7,766 0.5%

11 DIST OF COLUMBIA 5,419 0.3%

12 FLORIDA 32,881 2.0%

13 GEORGIA 45,108 2.8%

15 HAWAII 6,346 0.4%

16 IDAHO 2,564 0.2%

17 ILLINOIS 27,331 1.7%

18 INDIANA 25,676 1.6%

19 IOWA 28,415 1.8%

20 KANSAS 6,405 0.4%

21 KENTUCKY 18,016 1.1%

22 LOUISIANA 10,419 0.6%

23 MAINE 13,188 0.8%

24 MARYLAND 40,355 2.5%

25 MASSACHUSETTS 84,088 5.2%

26 MICHIGAN 61,168 3.8%

27 MINNESOTA 53,457 3.3%

28 MISSISSIPPI 4,406 0.3%

29 MISSOURI 36,827 2.3%

30 MONTANA 6,117 0.4%

31 NEBRASKA 16,159 1.0%

32 NEVADA 8,027 0.5%

33 NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,146 0.3%

34 NEW JERSEY 64,767 4.0%

35 NEW MEXICO 6,004 0.4%

36 NEW YORK 283,578 17.6%

37 NORTH CAROLINA 38,834 2.4%

38 NORTH DAKOTA 3,328 0.2%

39 OHIO 37,024 2.3%

40 OKLAHOMA 13,851 0.9%

41 OREGON 26,905 1.7%

42 PENNSYLVANIA 42,204 2.6%

Page 26: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

STFIPS: CENSUS STATE FIPS CODE

State FIPS codes consistent with those used by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

44 RHODE ISLAND 10,944 0.7%

46 SOUTH DAKOTA 12,152 0.8%

47 TENNESSEE 14,909 0.9%

48 TEXAS 39,485 2.4%

49 UTAH 11,831 0.7%

50 VERMONT 11,080 0.7%

51 VIRGINIA 25,060 1.6%

53 WASHINGTON 35,228 2.2%

54 WEST VIRGINIA 3,406 0.2%

55 WISCONSIN 18,762 1.2%

56 WYOMING 5,375 0.3%

72 PUERTO RICO 3,511 0.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 72

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 27: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

10180 ABILENE, TX METRO AREA 324 0.0%

10380 AGUADILLA-ISABELA, PR METRO AREA 92 0.0%

10420 AKRON, OH METRO AREA 2,445 0.2%

10540 ALBANY, OR METRO AREA 504 0.0%

10580 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY METRO AREA 18,061 1.1%

10740 ALBUQUERQUE, NM METRO AREA 1,445 0.1%

10780 ALEXANDRIA, LA METRO AREA 379 0.0%

10900 ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM-EASTON, PA-NJ METRO AREA 2,325 0.1%

11020 ALTOONA, PA METRO AREA 3,248 0.2%

11100 AMARILLO, TX METRO AREA 273 0.0%

11260 ANCHORAGE, AK METRO AREA 1,669 0.1%

11460 ANN ARBOR, MI METRO AREA 1,046 0.1%

11500 ANNISTON-OXFORD-JACKSONVILLE, AL METRO AREA 52 0.0%

11640 ARECIBO, PR METRO AREA 221 0.0%

11700 ASHEVILLE, NC METRO AREA 2,417 0.1%

11780 ASHTABULA, OH MICRO AREA 336 0.0%

12020 ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY, GA METRO AREA 1 0.0%

12060 ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-ROSWELL, GA METRO AREA 1,792 0.1%

12100 ATLANTIC CITY-HAMMONTON, NJ METRO AREA 4,881 0.3%

12260 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY, GA-SC METRO AREA 29 0.0%

12300 AUGUSTA-WATERVILLE, ME MICRO AREA 1,385 0.1%

12420 AUSTIN-ROUND ROCK, TX METRO AREA 1,991 0.1%

12540 BAKERSFIELD, CA METRO AREA 3,221 0.2%

12580 BALTIMORE-COLUMBIA-TOWSON, MD METRO AREA 20,426 1.3%

12620 BANGOR, ME METRO AREA 1,457 0.1%

12700 BARNSTABLE TOWN, MA METRO AREA 4,152 0.3%

12940 BATON ROUGE, LA METRO AREA 73 0.0%

12980 BATTLE CREEK, MI METRO AREA 2,073 0.1%

13020 BAY CITY, MI METRO AREA 514 0.0%

13140 BEAUMONT-PORT ARTHUR, TX METRO AREA 1,027 0.1%

13380 BELLINGHAM, WA METRO AREA 1,136 0.1%

13460 BEND-REDMOND, OR METRO AREA 1,150 0.1%

13740 BILLINGS, MT METRO AREA 921 0.1%

13780 BINGHAMTON, NY METRO AREA 3,027 0.2%

13820 BIRMINGHAM-HOOVER, AL METRO AREA 519 0.0%

Page 28: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

13980 BLACKSBURG-CHRISTIANSBURG-RADFORD, VA METRO AREA 353 0.0%

14010 BLOOMINGTON, IL METRO AREA 419 0.0%

14140 BLUEFIELD, WV-VA MICRO AREA 1,231 0.1%

14260 BOISE CITY, ID METRO AREA 948 0.1%

14460 BOSTON-CAMBRIDGE-NEWTON, MA-NH METRO AREA 44,645 2.8%

14500 BOULDER, CO METRO AREA 3,565 0.2%

14540 BOWLING GREEN, KY METRO AREA 558 0.0%

14740 BREMERTON-SILVERDALE, WA METRO AREA 1,154 0.1%

14860 BRIDGEPORT-STAMFORD-NORWALK, CT METRO AREA 16,698 1.0%

15180 BROWNSVILLE-HARLINGEN, TX METRO AREA 579 0.0%

15380 BUFFALO-CHEEKTOWAGA-NIAGARA FALLS, NY METRO AREA 19,036 1.2%

15500 BURLINGTON, NC METRO AREA 296 0.0%

15540 BURLINGTON-SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT METRO AREA 3,653 0.2%

15940 CANTON-MASSILLON, OH METRO AREA 2,624 0.2%

15980 CAPE CORAL-FORT MYERS, FL METRO AREA 31 0.0%

16300 CEDAR RAPIDS, IA METRO AREA 2,453 0.2%

16540 CHAMBERSBURG-WAYNESBORO, PA METRO AREA 114 0.0%

16580 CHAMPAIGN-URBANA, IL METRO AREA 395 0.0%

16620 CHARLESTON, WV METRO AREA 434 0.0%

16740 CHARLOTTE-CONCORD-GASTONIA, NC-SC METRO AREA 4,852 0.3%

16820 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA METRO AREA 1,003 0.1%

16860 CHATTANOOGA, TN-GA METRO AREA 1,240 0.1%

16980 CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-ELGIN, IL-IN-WI METRO AREA 14,232 0.9%

17020 CHICO, CA METRO AREA 756 0.0%

17140 CINCINNATI, OH-KY-IN METRO AREA 4,547 0.3%

17200 CLAREMONT-LEBANON, NH-VT MICRO AREA 2,453 0.2%

17300 CLARKSVILLE, TN-KY METRO AREA 638 0.0%

17420 CLEVELAND, TN METRO AREA 6 0.0%

17460 CLEVELAND-ELYRIA, OH METRO AREA 5,457 0.3%

17660 COEUR DALENE, ID METRO AREA 246 0.0%

17780 COLLEGE STATION-BRYAN, TX METRO AREA 43 0.0%

17820 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO METRO AREA 8,198 0.5%

17860 COLUMBIA, MO METRO AREA 1,494 0.1%

17980 COLUMBUS, GA-AL METRO AREA 1 0.0%

18140 COLUMBUS, OH METRO AREA 7,197 0.4%

Page 29: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

18180 CONCORD, NH MICRO AREA 396 0.0%

18580 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX METRO AREA 2,917 0.2%

18880 CRESTVIEW-FORT WALTON BEACH-DESTIN, FL METRO AREA 42 0.0%

19060 CUMBERLAND, MD-WV METRO AREA 1,368 0.1%

19100 DALLAS-FORT WORTH-ARLINGTON, TX METRO AREA 8,354 0.5%

19140 DALTON, GA METRO AREA 2 0.0%

19260 DANVILLE, VA MICRO AREA 287 0.0%

19340 DAVENPORT-MOLINE-ROCK ISLAND, IA-IL METRO AREA 3,008 0.2%

19380 DAYTON, OH METRO AREA 3,165 0.2%

19500 DECATUR, IL METRO AREA 431 0.0%

19660 DELTONA-DAYTONA BEACH-ORMOND BEACH, FL METRO AREA 564 0.0%

19740 DENVER-AURORA-LAKEWOOD, CO METRO AREA 53,314 3.3%

19780 DES MOINES-WEST DES MOINES, IA METRO AREA 3,976 0.2%

19820 DETROIT-WARREN-DEARBORN, MI METRO AREA 22,592 1.4%

20100 DOVER, DE METRO AREA 738 0.0%

20260 DULUTH, MN-WI METRO AREA 3,298 0.2%

20500 DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC METRO AREA 1,399 0.1%

20700 EAST STROUDSBURG, PA METRO AREA 290 0.0%

20940 EL CENTRO, CA METRO AREA 353 0.0%

21060 ELIZABETHTOWN-FORT KNOX, KY METRO AREA 273 0.0%

21340 EL PASO, TX METRO AREA 1,134 0.1%

21500 ERIE, PA METRO AREA 572 0.0%

21660 EUGENE, OR METRO AREA 1,071 0.1%

21700 EUREKA-ARCATA-FORTUNA, CA MICRO AREA 1,139 0.1%

21780 EVANSVILLE, IN-KY METRO AREA 91 0.0%

22020 FARGO, ND-MN METRO AREA 1,022 0.1%

22140 FARMINGTON, NM METRO AREA 156 0.0%

22180 FAYETTEVILLE, NC METRO AREA 943 0.1%

22220 FAYETTEVILLE-SPRINGDALE-ROGERS, AR-MO METRO AREA 749 0.0%

22420 FLINT, MI METRO AREA 3,712 0.2%

22660 FORT COLLINS, CO METRO AREA 2,677 0.2%

22900 FORT SMITH, AR-OK METRO AREA 514 0.0%

23420 FRESNO, CA METRO AREA 6,402 0.4%

24020 GLENS FALLS, NY METRO AREA 1,326 0.1%

24140 GOLDSBORO, NC METRO AREA 3,886 0.2%

Page 30: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

24300 GRAND JUNCTION, CO METRO AREA 2,395 0.1%

24340 GRAND RAPIDS-WYOMING, MI METRO AREA 6,800 0.4%

24540 GREELEY, CO METRO AREA 48 0.0%

24660 GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT, NC METRO AREA 2,949 0.2%

24780 GREENVILLE, NC METRO AREA 1,721 0.1%

25060 GULFPORT-BILOXI-PASCAGOULA, MS METRO AREA 573 0.0%

25180 HAGERSTOWN-MARTINSBURG, MD-WV METRO AREA 1,357 0.1%

25220 HAMMOND, LA METRO AREA 98 0.0%

25260 HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA METRO AREA 442 0.0%

25420 HARRISBURG-CARLISLE, PA METRO AREA 1,213 0.1%

25500 HARRISONBURG, VA METRO AREA 412 0.0%

25540 HARTFORD-WEST HARTFORD-EAST HARTFORD, CT METRO AREA 25,873 1.6%

25620 HATTIESBURG, MS METRO AREA 163 0.0%

25860 HICKORY-LENOIR-MORGANTON, NC METRO AREA 1,330 0.1%

25900 HILO, HI MICRO AREA 824 0.1%

26090 HOLLAND, MI MICRO AREA 231 0.0%

26380 HOUMA-THIBODAUX, LA METRO AREA 39 0.0%

26420 HOUSTON-THE WOODLANDS-SUGAR LAND, TX METRO AREA 7,513 0.5%

26580 HUNTINGTON-ASHLAND, WV-KY-OH METRO AREA 819 0.1%

26820 IDAHO FALLS, ID METRO AREA 297 0.0%

26900 INDIANAPOLIS-CARMEL-ANDERSON, IN METRO AREA 1,553 0.1%

26980 IOWA CITY, IA METRO AREA 2,552 0.2%

27100 JACKSON, MI METRO AREA 708 0.0%

27140 JACKSON, MS METRO AREA 1,197 0.1%

27180 JACKSON, TN METRO AREA 549 0.0%

27260 JACKSONVILLE, FL METRO AREA 315 0.0%

27340 JACKSONVILLE, NC METRO AREA 236 0.0%

27460 JAMESTOWN-DUNKIRK-FREDONIA, NY MICRO AREA 1,056 0.1%

27620 JEFFERSON CITY, MO METRO AREA 997 0.1%

27740 JOHNSON CITY, TN METRO AREA 932 0.1%

27780 JOHNSTOWN, PA METRO AREA 735 0.0%

27860 JONESBORO, AR METRO AREA 233 0.0%

27900 JOPLIN, MO METRO AREA 1,620 0.1%

27980 KAHULUI-WAILUKU-LAHAINA, HI METRO AREA 1,126 0.1%

28020 KALAMAZOO-PORTAGE, MI METRO AREA 3,618 0.2%

Page 31: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

28100 KANKAKEE, IL METRO AREA 529 0.0%

28140 KANSAS CITY, MO-KS METRO AREA 8,438 0.5%

28420 KENNEWICK-RICHLAND, WA METRO AREA 782 0.0%

28660 KILLEEN-TEMPLE, TX METRO AREA 253 0.0%

28700 KINGSPORT-BRISTOL-BRISTOL, TN-VA METRO AREA 1,031 0.1%

28740 KINGSTON, NY METRO AREA 3,184 0.2%

28940 KNOXVILLE, TN METRO AREA 1,655 0.1%

29100 LA CROSSE-ONALASKA, WI-MN METRO AREA 61 0.0%

29180 LAFAYETTE, LA METRO AREA 86 0.0%

29340 LAKE CHARLES, LA METRO AREA 6 0.0%

29460 LAKELAND-WINTER HAVEN, FL METRO AREA 59 0.0%

29540 LANCASTER, PA METRO AREA 1,459 0.1%

29620 LANSING-EAST LANSING, MI METRO AREA 1,488 0.1%

29700 LAREDO, TX METRO AREA 626 0.0%

29820 LAS VEGAS-HENDERSON-PARADISE, NV METRO AREA 4,019 0.2%

30140 LEBANON, PA METRO AREA 705 0.0%

30340 LEWISTON-AUBURN, ME METRO AREA 2,052 0.1%

30460 LEXINGTON-FAYETTE, KY METRO AREA 1,653 0.1%

30620 LIMA, OH METRO AREA 107 0.0%

30700 LINCOLN, NE METRO AREA 6,803 0.4%

30780 LITTLE ROCK-NORTH LITTLE ROCK-CONWAY, AR METRO AREA 1,990 0.1%

30860 LOGAN, UT-ID METRO AREA 566 0.0%

30980 LONGVIEW, TX METRO AREA 508 0.0%

31080 LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-ANAHEIM, CA METRO AREA 37,238 2.3%

31140 LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY-IN METRO AREA 6,467 0.4%

31180 LUBBOCK, TX METRO AREA 840 0.1%

31300 LUMBERTON, NC MICRO AREA 432 0.0%

31340 LYNCHBURG, VA METRO AREA 406 0.0%

31420 MACON, GA METRO AREA 60 0.0%

31460 MADERA, CA METRO AREA 508 0.0%

31700 MANCHESTER-NASHUA, NH METRO AREA 1,333 0.1%

31900 MANSFIELD, OH METRO AREA 51 0.0%

32420 MAYAGÜEZ, PR METRO AREA 84 0.0%

32580 MCALLEN-EDINBURG-MISSION, TX METRO AREA 95 0.0%

32780 MEDFORD, OR METRO AREA 606 0.0%

Page 32: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

32820 MEMPHIS, TN-MS-AR METRO AREA 2,551 0.2%

32900 MERCED, CA METRO AREA 922 0.1%

32940 MERIDIAN, MS MICRO AREA 297 0.0%

33100 MIAMI-FORT LAUDERDALE-WEST PALM BEACH, FL METRO AREA 4,174 0.3%

33260 MIDLAND, TX METRO AREA 396 0.0%

33460 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI METRO AREA 32,930 2.0%

33700 MODESTO, CA METRO AREA 1,901 0.1%

33740 MONROE, LA METRO AREA 62 0.0%

33780 MONROE, MI METRO AREA 321 0.0%

34060 MORGANTOWN, WV METRO AREA 168 0.0%

34100 MORRISTOWN, TN METRO AREA 130 0.0%

34580 MOUNT VERNON-ANACORTES, WA METRO AREA 1,321 0.1%

34740 MUSKEGON, MI METRO AREA 1,665 0.1%

34820 MYRTLE BEACH-CONWAY-NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, SC-NC METROAREA

323 0.0%

34900 NAPA, CA METRO AREA 1,118 0.1%

34940 NAPLES-IMMOKALEE-MARCO ISLAND, FL METRO AREA 12 0.0%

34980 NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON--MURFREESBORO--FRANKLIN, TN METROAREA

1,636 0.1%

35100 NEW BERN, NC METRO AREA 421 0.0%

35300 NEW HAVEN-MILFORD, CT METRO AREA 11,130 0.7%

35380 NEW ORLEANS-METAIRIE, LA METRO AREA 774 0.0%

35620 NEW YORK-NEWARK-JERSEY CITY, NY-NJ-PA METRO AREA 219,603 13.6%

35660 NILES-BENTON HARBOR, MI METRO AREA 334 0.0%

35840 NORTH PORT-SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL METRO AREA 149 0.0%

35980 NORWICH-NEW LONDON, CT METRO AREA 8,495 0.5%

36100 OCALA, FL METRO AREA 29 0.0%

36220 ODESSA, TX METRO AREA 269 0.0%

36260 OGDEN-CLEARFIELD, UT METRO AREA 1,543 0.1%

36300 OGDENSBURG-MASSENA, NY MICRO AREA 2,839 0.2%

36500 OLYMPIA-TUMWATER, WA METRO AREA 1,158 0.1%

36540 OMAHA-COUNCIL BLUFFS, NE-IA METRO AREA 5,913 0.4%

36740 ORLANDO-KISSIMMEE-SANFORD, FL METRO AREA 1,158 0.1%

36860 OTTAWA-PERU, IL MICRO AREA 177 0.0%

36980 OWENSBORO, KY METRO AREA 522 0.0%

Page 33: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

37100 OXNARD-THOUSAND OAKS-VENTURA, CA METRO AREA 4,194 0.3%

37340 PALM BAY-MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE, FL METRO AREA 8 0.0%

37460 PANAMA CITY, FL METRO AREA 206 0.0%

37860 PENSACOLA-FERRY PASS-BRENT, FL METRO AREA 119 0.0%

37900 PEORIA, IL METRO AREA 2,123 0.1%

37980 PHILADELPHIA-CAMDEN-WILMINGTON, PA-NJ-DE-MD METRO AREA 22,211 1.4%

38220 PINE BLUFF, AR METRO AREA 484 0.0%

38300 PITTSBURGH, PA METRO AREA 6,136 0.4%

38340 PITTSFIELD, MA METRO AREA 3,153 0.2%

38660 PONCE, PR METRO AREA 582 0.0%

38860 PORTLAND-SOUTH PORTLAND, ME METRO AREA 5,553 0.3%

38900 PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-HILLSBORO, OR-WA METRO AREA 8,338 0.5%

38940 PORT ST. LUCIE, FL METRO AREA 541 0.0%

39060 POTTSVILLE, PA MICRO AREA 437 0.0%

39300 PROVIDENCE-WARWICK, RI-MA METRO AREA 22,330 1.4%

39340 PROVO-OREM, UT METRO AREA 671 0.0%

39380 PUEBLO, CO METRO AREA 3,735 0.2%

39460 PUNTA GORDA, FL METRO AREA 1 0.0%

39580 RALEIGH, NC METRO AREA 2,143 0.1%

39660 RAPID CITY, SD METRO AREA 4,189 0.3%

39740 READING, PA METRO AREA 1,386 0.1%

39820 REDDING, CA METRO AREA 1,658 0.1%

39900 RENO, NV METRO AREA 1,937 0.1%

40060 RICHMOND, VA METRO AREA 3,586 0.2%

40140 RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO-ONTARIO, CA METRO AREA 13,073 0.8%

40220 ROANOKE, VA METRO AREA 1,968 0.1%

40340 ROCHESTER, MN METRO AREA 2,094 0.1%

40380 ROCHESTER, NY METRO AREA 17,064 1.1%

40420 ROCKFORD, IL METRO AREA 952 0.1%

40580 ROCKY MOUNT, NC METRO AREA 203 0.0%

40700 ROSEBURG, OR MICRO AREA 4 0.0%

40900 SACRAMENTO--ROSEVILLE--ARDEN-ARCADE, CA METRO AREA 8,569 0.5%

40980 SAGINAW, MI METRO AREA 1,783 0.1%

41060 ST. CLOUD, MN METRO AREA 2,401 0.1%

41140 ST. JOSEPH, MO-KS METRO AREA 716 0.0%

Page 34: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

41180 ST. LOUIS, MO-IL METRO AREA 10,186 0.6%

41400 SALEM, OH MICRO AREA 961 0.1%

41420 SALEM, OR METRO AREA 1,583 0.1%

41500 SALINAS, CA METRO AREA 1,101 0.1%

41540 SALISBURY, MD-DE METRO AREA 2,825 0.2%

41620 SALT LAKE CITY, UT METRO AREA 7,896 0.5%

41660 SAN ANGELO, TX METRO AREA 266 0.0%

41700 SAN ANTONIO-NEW BRAUNFELS, TX METRO AREA 4,314 0.3%

41740 SAN DIEGO-CARLSBAD, CA METRO AREA 14,491 0.9%

41860 SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND-HAYWARD, CA METRO AREA 20,527 1.3%

41940 SAN JOSE-SUNNYVALE-SANTA CLARA, CA METRO AREA 8,239 0.5%

41980 SAN JUAN-CAROLINA-CAGUAS, PR METRO AREA 1,897 0.1%

42020 SAN LUIS OBISPO-PASO ROBLES-ARROYO GRANDE, CA METROAREA

1,219 0.1%

42100 SANTA CRUZ-WATSONVILLE, CA METRO AREA 1,694 0.1%

42140 SANTA FE, NM METRO AREA 1,482 0.1%

42200 SANTA MARIA-SANTA BARBARA, CA METRO AREA 3,219 0.2%

42220 SANTA ROSA, CA METRO AREA 4,918 0.3%

42340 SAVANNAH, GA METRO AREA 161 0.0%

42540 SCRANTON--WILKES-BARRE--HAZLETON, PA METRO AREA 1,393 0.1%

42660 SEATTLE-TACOMA-BELLEVUE, WA METRO AREA 13,473 0.8%

42680 SEBASTIAN-VERO BEACH, FL METRO AREA 28 0.0%

43300 SHERMAN-DENISON, TX METRO AREA 152 0.0%

43340 SHREVEPORT-BOSSIER CITY, LA METRO AREA 107 0.0%

43580 SIOUX CITY, IA-NE-SD METRO AREA 2,426 0.2%

43620 SIOUX FALLS, SD METRO AREA 4,140 0.3%

43780 SOUTH BEND-MISHAWAKA, IN-MI METRO AREA 436 0.0%

44060 SPOKANE-SPOKANE VALLEY, WA METRO AREA 3,830 0.2%

44100 SPRINGFIELD, IL METRO AREA 884 0.1%

44140 SPRINGFIELD, MA METRO AREA 7,429 0.5%

44180 SPRINGFIELD, MO METRO AREA 2,910 0.2%

44220 SPRINGFIELD, OH METRO AREA 536 0.0%

44300 STATE COLLEGE, PA METRO AREA 336 0.0%

44420 STAUNTON-WAYNESBORO, VA METRO AREA 279 0.0%

44700 STOCKTON-LODI, CA METRO AREA 2,110 0.1%

Page 35: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

45060 SYRACUSE, NY METRO AREA 11,882 0.7%

45220 TALLAHASSEE, FL METRO AREA 325 0.0%

45300 TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL METRO AREA 3,603 0.2%

45500 TEXARKANA, TX-AR METRO AREA 44 0.0%

45780 TOLEDO, OH METRO AREA 803 0.0%

45820 TOPEKA, KS METRO AREA 584 0.0%

45860 TORRINGTON, CT MICRO AREA 1,973 0.1%

45900 TRAVERSE CITY, MI MICRO AREA 2,094 0.1%

45940 TRENTON, NJ METRO AREA 2,234 0.1%

46180 TUPELO, MS MICRO AREA 88 0.0%

46220 TUSCALOOSA, AL METRO AREA 395 0.0%

46340 TYLER, TX METRO AREA 256 0.0%

46520 URBAN HONOLULU, HI METRO AREA 4,140 0.3%

46540 UTICA-ROME, NY METRO AREA 4,536 0.3%

46660 VALDOSTA, GA METRO AREA 17 0.0%

46700 VALLEJO-FAIRFIELD, CA METRO AREA 867 0.1%

47220 VINELAND-BRIDGETON, NJ METRO AREA 1,302 0.1%

47260 VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-NC METRO AREA 3,864 0.2%

47300 VISALIA-PORTERVILLE, CA METRO AREA 3,381 0.2%

47380 WACO, TX METRO AREA 12 0.0%

47900 WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-MD-WV METROAREA

22,043 1.4%

47940 WATERLOO-CEDAR FALLS, IA METRO AREA 2,065 0.1%

48060 WATERTOWN-FORT DRUM, NY METRO AREA 1,163 0.1%

48260 WEIRTON-STEUBENVILLE, WV-OH METRO AREA 101 0.0%

48540 WHEELING, WV-OH METRO AREA 266 0.0%

48620 WICHITA, KS METRO AREA 2,028 0.1%

48660 WICHITA FALLS, TX METRO AREA 235 0.0%

48700 WILLIAMSPORT, PA METRO AREA 176 0.0%

48900 WILMINGTON, NC METRO AREA 2,382 0.1%

49020 WINCHESTER, VA-WV METRO AREA 5 0.0%

49180 WINSTON-SALEM, NC METRO AREA 3,532 0.2%

49300 WOOSTER, OH MICRO AREA 5 0.0%

49340 WORCESTER, MA-CT METRO AREA 13,235 0.8%

49420 YAKIMA, WA METRO AREA 2,546 0.2%

Page 36: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

CBSA: FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE

The term 'Core Based Statistical Area' (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas. Metropolitan andMicropolitan statistical areas (metro and micro areas) are geographic entities defined by the U.S. Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishingFederal statistics. A metro area contains a core urban area of 50,000 or more population, and a micro area containsan urban core of at least 10,000 (but less than 50,000) population. Each metro or micro area consists of one or morecounties and includes the counties containing the core urban area, as well as any adjacent counties that have a highdegree of social and economic integration (as measured by commuting to work) with the urban core.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

49620 YORK-HANOVER, PA METRO AREA 642 0.0%

49660 YOUNGSTOWN-WARREN-BOARDMAN, OH-PA METRO AREA 884 0.1%

49700 YUBA CITY, CA METRO AREA 730 0.0%

-9 UNDESIGNATED AREA/MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOTCOLLECTED/INVALID

416,457 25.8%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 10180• Maximum: 49700

Width: 5; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 37: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

REGION: CENSUS REGIONREGION: CENSUS REGION

CENSUS REGION: Geographic regions used are based on divisions used by the U.S. Bureau of Census, 1970Census of Population. They are comprised of the following states and territories:

• U.S. TERRITORIES: Puerto Rico

• NORTHEAST: New England Division (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont)and Middle Atlantic Division (New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania).

• MIDWEST: East North Central Division (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin) and West North Central Division(Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota).

• SOUTH: South Atlantic Division (Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, SouthCarolina, Virginia, West Virginia) and East South Central Division (Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee), andWest South Central Division (Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas).

• WEST: Mountain Division (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming) and PacificDivision (Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington).

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 US JURISDICTION/TERRITORY 3,511 0.2%

1 NORTHEAST 835,653 51.8%

2 MIDWEST 72,175 4.5%

3 SOUTH 318,198 19.7%

4 WEST 384,821 23.8%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 4

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 38: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

DIVISION: CENSUS DIVISIONDIVISION: CENSUS DIVISION

CENSUS DIVISION: Census divisions are groupings of states that are subdivisions of the four census regions. Thereare nine divisions, which the Census Bureau adopted in 1910 for the presentation of data. The divisions and the statesincluded in them are:

• U.S. TERRITORIES: Puerto Rico

• NEW ENGLAND: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

• MIDDLE ATLANTIC: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.

• EAST NORTH CENTRAL: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

• WEST NORTH CENTRAL: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

• SOUTH ATLANTIC: Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina,Virginia, and West Virginia.

• EAST SOUTH CENTRAL: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee.

• WEST SOUTH CENTRAL: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas.

• MOUNTAIN: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.

• PACIFIC: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 US JURISDICTION/TERRITORY 3,511 0.2%

1 NEW ENGLAND 190,575 11.8%

2 MID-ATLANTIC 390,549 24.2%

3 EAST NORTH CENTRAL 169,961 10.5%

4 WEST NORTH CENTRAL 156,743 9.7%

5 SOUTH ATLANTIC 198,829 12.3%

6 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL 46,870 2.9%

7 WEST SOUTH CENTRAL 72,499 4.5%

8 MOUNTAIN 151,562 9.4%

9 PACIFIC 233,259 14.4%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 9

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 39: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SERVSETA: SERVICE SETTING AT ADMISSIONSERVSETA: SERVICE SETTING AT ADMISSION

Describes the type of service and treatment setting in which the client is placed at the time of admission or transfer.

• DETOXIFICATION, 24-HOUR SERVICE, HOSPITAL INPATIENT:24 hour per day medical acute care services in hospital setting for detoxification of persons with severe medicalcomplications associated with withdrawal.

• DETOXIFICATION, 24-HOUR SERVICE, FREE-STANDING RESIDENTIAL:24 hour per day services in non-hospital setting providing for safe withdrawal and transition to ongoing treatment.

• REHABILITATION/RESIDENTIAL - HOSPITAL (OTHER THAN DETOX):24 hour per day medical care in a hospital facility in conjunction with treatment services for alcohol and other drugabuse and dependency.

• REHABILITATION/RESIDENTIAL - SHORT TERM (30 DAYS OR FEWER):Typically, 30 days or less of non-acute care in a setting with treatment services for alcohol and other drug abuse anddependency.

• REHABILITATION/RESIDENTIAL - LONG TERM (MORE THAN 30 DAYS):Typically, more than 30 days of non-acute care in a setting with treatment services for alcohol and other drug abuseand dependency; this may include transitional living arrangements such as halfway houses.

• AMBULATORY - INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT:As a minimum, the client receives treatment lasting two or more hours per day for three or more days per week.

• AMBULATORY - NON-INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT:Ambulatory treatment services including individual, family, and/or group services, and may include pharmacologicaltherapies.

• AMBULATORY - DETOXIFICATION:Outpatient treatment services providing for safe withdrawal in an ambulatory setting (pharmacological ornon-pharmacological).

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 DETOX, 24 HR, HOSPITAL INPATIENT 49,879 3.1%

2 DETOX, 24 HR, FREE-STANDING RESIDENTIAL 310,124 19.2%

3 REHAB/RES, HOSPITAL (NON-DETOX) 4,097 0.3%

4 REHAB/RES, SHORT TERM (30 DAYS OR FEWER) 150,488 9.3%

5 REHAB/RES, LONG TERM (MORE THAN 30 DAYS) 116,612 7.2%

6 AMBULATORY, INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT 187,817 11.6%

7 AMBULATORY, NON-INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT. 777,138 48.1%

8 AMBULATORY, DETOXIFICATION 17,935 1.1%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 268 0.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 8

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 40: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

METHUSE: MEDICATION-ASSISTED OPIOID THERAPYMETHUSE: MEDICATION-ASSISTED OPIOID THERAPY

This field identifies whether the use of Methadone or Buprenorphine is part of the client's treatment plan.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 YES 135,163 8.4%

2 NO 1,398,869 86.7%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 80,326 5.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 41: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

DAYWAIT: DAYS WAITING TO ENTER TREATMENTDAYWAIT: DAYS WAITING TO ENTER TREATMENT

Indicates the number of days from the first contact or request for service until the client was admitted and the firstclinical service was provided.

Guidelines: This item is intended to capture the number of days the client must wait to begin treatment because ofprogram capacity, treatment availability, admissions requirements, or other program requirements. It should notinclude time delays caused by client unavailability or client failure to meet any requirement or obligation.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 0 593,758 36.8%

1 1 56,591 3.5%

2 2 22,054 1.4%

3 3 19,441 1.2%

4 4 15,053 0.9%

5 5 20,067 1.2%

6 6 13,877 0.9%

7 7 26,250 1.6%

8 8 9,874 0.6%

9 9 6,388 0.4%

10 10 9,972 0.6%

11 11 4,507 0.3%

12 12 5,099 0.3%

13 13 5,297 0.3%

14 14 11,637 0.7%

15 15 5,270 0.3%

16 16 2,809 0.2%

17 17 2,460 0.2%

18 18 2,291 0.1%

19 19 2,292 0.1%

20 20 3,706 0.2%

21 21 4,789 0.3%

22 22 2,089 0.1%

23 23 1,492 0.1%

24 24 1,281 0.1%

25 25 1,627 0.1%

26 26 1,393 0.1%

27 27 1,581 0.1%

28 28 2,079 0.1%

29 29 1,341 0.1%

30 30 5,153 0.3%

31 31 837 0.1%

32 32 720 0.0%

33 33 855 0.1%

34 34 951 0.1%

35 35 1,315 0.1%

Page 42: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

DAYWAIT: DAYS WAITING TO ENTER TREATMENT

Indicates the number of days from the first contact or request for service until the client was admitted and the firstclinical service was provided.

Guidelines: This item is intended to capture the number of days the client must wait to begin treatment because ofprogram capacity, treatment availability, admissions requirements, or other program requirements. It should notinclude time delays caused by client unavailability or client failure to meet any requirement or obligation.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

36 36 831 0.1%

37 37 579 0.0%

38 38 473 0.0%

39 39 441 0.0%

40 40 838 0.1%

41 41 598 0.0%

42 42 775 0.0%

43 43 478 0.0%

44 44 376 0.0%

45 45 993 0.1%

46 46 302 0.0%

47 47 345 0.0%

48 48 461 0.0%

49 49 520 0.0%

X OTHER DAYWAIT CATEGORIES NOT PRINTED HERE 19,245 1.2%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 720,907 44.7%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 996

Width: 3; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 43: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

PSOURCE: PRINCIPAL SOURCE OF REFERRALPSOURCE: PRINCIPAL SOURCE OF REFERRAL

Describes the person or agency referring the client to the alcohol or drug abuse treatment program:

• INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDES SELF-REFERRAL): Includes the client, a family member, friend, or any other individualwho would not be included in any of the following categories. Includes self-referral due to pending DWU/DUI.

• ALCOHOL/DRUG ABUSE CARE PROVIDER: Any program, clinic, or other HEALTH CARE PROVIDER whoseprincipal objective is treating clients with substance abuse problems, or a program whose activities are related toalcohol or other drug abuse prevention, education, or treatment.

• OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER: A physician, psychiatrist, or other licensed health care professional; or generalhospital, psychiatric hospital, mental health program, or nursing home.

• SCHOOL (EDUCATIONAL): A school principal, counselor, or teacher; or a student assistance program (SAP), theschool system, or an educational agency.

• EMPLOYER/EAP: A supervisor or an employee counselor.

• OTHER COMMUNITY REFERRAL: Community or religious organization or any Federal, State, or local agency thatprovides aid in the areas of poverty relief, unemployment, shelter, or social welfare. Self-help groups such asAlcoholics Anonymous (AA), Al-Anon, and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) are also included in this category. Defenseattorneys are also included in this category.

• COURT / CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRAL / DUI/DWI: Any police official, judge, prosecutor, probation officer, orother person affiliated with a Federal, State, or county judicial system. Includes referral by a court for DWI/DUI,clients referred in lieu of or for deferred prosecution, or during pretrial release, or before or after official adjudication.Includes clients on pre-parole, pre-release, work or home furlough, or TASC. Client need not be officially designatedas 'on parole'. Includes clients referred through civil commitment. Client referrals in this category are further defined inthe Supplemental Data Set item 'Detailed Criminal Justice Referral (DETCRIM)'.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDES SELF-REFERRAL) 592,853 36.7%

2 ALCOHOL/DRUG ABUSE CARE PROVIDER 168,695 10.4%

3 OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER 110,747 6.9%

4 SCHOOL (EDUCATIONAL) 11,831 0.7%

5 EMPLOYER/EAP 6,126 0.4%

6 OTHER COMMUNITY REFERRAL 171,344 10.6%

7 COURT/CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRAL / DUI / DWI 519,849 32.2%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 32,913 2.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 7

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 44: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

DETCRIM: DETAILED CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRALDETCRIM: DETAILED CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRAL

This field gives more detailed information about those clients who are coded as 'Criminal Justice Referral' in theMinimum Data Set field for 'Principal Source of Referral' (PSOURCE).

• STATE/FEDERAL COURT, OTHER COURT

• PROBATION/PAROLE

• DIVERSIONARY PROGRAM (e.g. TASC)

• PRISON

• DUI/DWI

• OTHER RECOGNIZED LEGAL ENTITY, OTHER: Other recognized legal entities includes local law enforcementagency, corrections agency, youth services, review board/agency)

Guidelines: This field is to be used only Principal Source of Referral in the Minimum Data Set field is coded 07,'Criminal Justice Referral'. For all other Principal Source of Referral codes (01 to 06 and missing), this field should becoded as Missing.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 STATE/FEDERAL COURT, OTHER COURT 101,867 6.3%

3 PROBATION/PAROLE 123,694 7.7%

5 DIVERSIONARY PROGRAM 10,376 0.6%

6 PRISON 8,240 0.5%

7 DUI/DWI 39,891 2.5%

8 OTHER RECOGNIZED LEGAL ENTITY, OTHER 87,915 5.4%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,242,375 77.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 8

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 45: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

NOPRIOR: NUMBER OF PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODESNOPRIOR: NUMBER OF PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES

Indicates the number of previous treatment episodes the client has received in any drug or alcohol program. Changesin service for the same episode (transfers) should not be counted as separate prior episodes.

Guidelines: It is preferred that the number of prior treatments be a self-reported field collected at the time of clientintake. However, this data item may be derived from the State data system, if the system has that capability, andepisodes can be counted for at least several years.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 NO PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES 547,735 33.9%

1 1 PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES 327,796 20.3%

2 2 PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES 180,682 11.2%

3 3 PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES 113,103 7.0%

4 4 PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES 67,192 4.2%

5 5 OR MORE PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES 215,224 13.3%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 162,626 10.1%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 5

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 46: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SUB1: SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (PRIMARY)

This field identifies the client's primary substance problem.

(1) NONE

(2) ALCOHOL

(3) COCAINE/CRACK

(4) MARIJUANA/HASHISH: Includes THC and any other cannabis sativa preparations.

(5) HEROIN

(6) NON-PRESCRIPTION METHADONE

(7) OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS: Includes buprenorphine, codeine, Hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine,morphine, opium, oxycodone, pentazocine, propoxyphene, tramadol, and any other drug with morphine-like effects.

(8) PCP: Phencyclidine

(9) OTHER HALLUCINOGENS: Includes LSD, DMT, STP, hallucinogens, mescaline, peyote, psilocybin, etc.

(10) METHAMPHETAMINE

(11) OTHER AMPHETAMINES: Includes amphetamines, MDMA, phenmetrazine, and other unspecified amines and relateddrugs.

(12) OTHER STIMULANTS: Includes methylphenidate and any other stimulants.

(13) BENZODIAZEPINES: Includes alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, clonazepam, clorazepate, diazepam, flunitrazepam,flurazepam, halazepam, lorazepam, oxazepam, prazepam, temazepam, triazolam, and other unspecified benzodiazepines.

(14) OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS: Includes meprobamate, tranquilizers, etc.

(15) BARBITURATES: Includes amobarbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, etc.

(16) OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS: Includes chloral hydrate, ethchlorvynol, glutethimide,methaqualone, sedatives/hypnotics, etc.

(17) INHALANTS: Includes chloroform, ether, gasoline, glue, nitrous oxide, paint thinner, etc.

(18) OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATIONS: Includes aspirin, cough syrup, diphenhydramine and other anti-histamines,sleep aids, and any other legally obtained non-prescription medication.

(20) OTHER: Includes diphenylhydantoin/phenytoin, GHB/GBL, ketamine, etc.

See next page for frequency table

Page 47: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SUB1: SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (PRIMARY)

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NONE 15,844 1.0%

2 ALCOHOL 585,024 36.2%

3 COCAINE/CRACK 87,510 5.4%

4 MARIJUANA/HASHISH 247,461 15.3%

5 HEROIN 357,293 22.1%

6 NON-PRESCRIPTION METHADONE 4,212 0.3%

7 OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS 128,175 7.9%

8 PCP 4,910 0.3%

9 OTHER HALLUCINOGENS 1,864 0.1%

10 METHAMPHETAMINE 135,264 8.4%

11 OTHER AMPHETAMINES 8,395 0.5%

12 OTHER STIMULANTS 768 0.0%

13 BENZODIAZEPINES 14,851 0.9%

14 OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS 255 0.0%

15 BARBITURATES 1,119 0.1%

16 OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS 1,702 0.1%

17 INHALANTS 791 0.0%

18 OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATIONS 911 0.1%

20 OTHER 7,108 0.4%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 10,901 0.7%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 48: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ROUTE1: USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (PRIMARY)ROUTE1: USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (PRIMARY)

This field identifies the usual route of administration of the primary substance.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 ORAL 694,665 43.0%

2 SMOKING 413,111 25.6%

3 INHALATION 137,892 8.5%

4 INJECTION (IV OR INTRAMUSCULAR) 319,379 19.8%

20 OTHER 11,284 0.7%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 38,027 2.4%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 49: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

FREQ1: FREQUENCY OF USE (PRIMARY)FREQ1: FREQUENCY OF USE (PRIMARY)

Specifies the frequency of use of the primary substance.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NO USE IN THE PAST MONTH 439,040 27.2%

2 1-3 TIMES IN THE PAST MONTH 179,871 11.1%

3 1-2 TIMES IN THE PAST WEEK 131,020 8.1%

4 3-6 TIMES IN THE PAST WEEK 178,725 11.1%

5 DAILY 647,377 40.1%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 38,325 2.4%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 5

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 50: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

FRSTUSE1: AGE AT FIRST USE (PRIMARY)FRSTUSE1: AGE AT FIRST USE (PRIMARY)

For drugs other than alcohol, this field identifies the age at which the client first used the substance identified as theprimary substance. For alcohol, this field records the age of the first intoxication.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 11 AND UNDER 97,811 6.1%

2 12-14 317,421 19.7%

3 15-17 422,945 26.2%

4 18-20 286,830 17.8%

5 21-24 177,899 11.0%

6 25-29 119,945 7.4%

7 30-34 63,544 3.9%

8 35-39 33,516 2.1%

9 40-44 19,893 1.2%

10 45-49 11,218 0.7%

11 50-54 6,211 0.4%

12 55 AND OVER 3,812 0.2%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 53,313 3.3%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 12

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 51: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SUB2: SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (SECONDARY)

This field identifies the client's secondary substance problem.

(1) NONE

(2) ALCOHOL

(3) COCAINE/CRACK

(4) MARIJUANA/HASHISH: Includes THC and any other cannabis sativa preparations.

(5) HEROIN

(6) NON-PRESCRIPTION METHADONE

(7) OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS: Includes buprenorphine, codeine, Hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine,morphine, opium, oxycodone, pentazocine, propoxyphene, tramadol, and any other drug with morphine-like effects.

(8) PCP: Phencyclidine

(9) OTHER HALLUCINOGENS: Includes LSD, DMT, STP, hallucinogens, mescaline, peyote, psilocybin, etc.

(10) METHAMPHETAMINE

(11) OTHER AMPHETAMINES: Includes amphetamines, MDMA, phenmetrazine, and other unspecified amines and relateddrugs.

(12) OTHER STIMULANTS: Includes methylphenidate and any other stimulants.

(13) BENZODIAZEPINES: Includes alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, clonazepam, clorazepate, diazepam, flunitrazepam,flurazepam, halazepam, lorazepam, oxazepam, prazepam, temazepam, triazolam, and other unspecified benzodiazepines.

(14) OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS: Includes meprobamate, tranquilizers, etc.

(15) BARBITURATES: Includes amobarbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, etc.

(16) OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS: Includes chloral hydrate, ethchlorvynol, glutethimide,methaqualone, sedatives/hypnotics, etc.

(17) INHALANTS: Includes chloroform, ether, gasoline, glue, nitrous oxide, paint thinner, etc.

(18) OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATIONS: Includes aspirin, cough syrup, diphenhydramine and other anti-histamines,sleep aids, and any other legally obtained non-prescription medication.

(20) OTHER: Includes diphenylhydantoin/phenytoin, GHB/GBL, ketamine, etc.

See next page for frequency table

Page 52: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SUB2: SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (SECONDARY)

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NONE 676,593 41.9%

2 ALCOHOL 186,731 11.6%

3 COCAINE/CRACK 149,016 9.2%

4 MARIJUANA/HASHISH 243,185 15.1%

5 HEROIN 46,065 2.9%

6 NON-PRESCRIPTION METHADONE 3,862 0.2%

7 OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS 78,471 4.9%

8 PCP 3,119 0.2%

9 OTHER HALLUCINOGENS 3,210 0.2%

10 METHAMPHETAMINE 63,961 4.0%

11 OTHER AMPHETAMINES 8,255 0.5%

12 OTHER STIMULANTS 1,231 0.1%

13 BENZODIAZEPINES 51,825 3.2%

14 OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS 634 0.0%

15 BARBITURATES 793 0.0%

16 OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS 3,584 0.2%

17 INHALANTS 757 0.0%

18 OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATIONS 1,271 0.1%

20 OTHER 32,573 2.0%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 59,222 3.7%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 53: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ROUTE2: USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (SECONDARY)ROUTE2: USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (SECONDARY)

This field identifies the usual route of administration of the secondary substance.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 ORAL 309,188 19.2%

2 SMOKING 385,205 23.9%

3 INHALATION 93,555 5.8%

4 INJECTION (IV OR INTRAMUSCULAR) 79,984 5.0%

20 OTHER 7,173 0.4%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 739,253 45.8%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 54: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

FREQ2: FREQUENCY OF USE (SECONDARY)FREQ2: FREQUENCY OF USE (SECONDARY)

Specifies the frequency of use of the secondary substance.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NO USE IN THE PAST MONTH 362,885 22.5%

2 1-3 TIMES IN THE PAST MONTH 131,341 8.1%

3 1-2 TIMES IN THE PAST WEEK 90,817 5.6%

4 3-6 TIMES IN THE PAST WEEK 90,910 5.6%

5 DAILY 251,887 15.6%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 686,518 42.5%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 5

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 55: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

FRSTUSE2: AGE AT FIRST USE (SECONDARY)FRSTUSE2: AGE AT FIRST USE (SECONDARY)

For drugs other than alcohol, this field identifies the age at which the client first used the substance identified as thesecondary substance. For alcohol, this field records the age of the first intoxication.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 11 AND UNDER 61,505 3.8%

2 12-14 204,740 12.7%

3 15-17 258,749 16.0%

4 18-20 159,274 9.9%

5 21-24 93,106 5.8%

6 25-29 69,010 4.3%

7 30-34 37,847 2.3%

8 35-39 20,447 1.3%

9 40-44 13,099 0.8%

10 45-49 8,086 0.5%

11 50-54 4,814 0.3%

12 55 AND OVER 2,912 0.2%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 680,769 42.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 12

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 56: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SUB3: SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (TERTIARY)

This field identifies the client's secondary substance problem.

(1) NONE

(2) ALCOHOL

(3) COCAINE/CRACK

(4) MARIJUANA/HASHISH: Includes THC and any other cannabis sativa preparations.

(5) HEROIN

(6) NON-PRESCRIPTION METHADONE

(7) OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS: Includes buprenorphine, codeine, Hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine,morphine, opium, oxycodone, pentazocine, propoxyphene, tramadol, and any other drug with morphine-like effects.

(8) PCP: Phencyclidine

(9) OTHER HALLUCINOGENS: Includes LSD, DMT, STP, hallucinogens, mescaline, peyote, psilocybin, etc.

(10) METHAMPHETAMINE

(11) OTHER AMPHETAMINES: Includes amphetamines, MDMA, phenmetrazine, and other unspecified amines and relateddrugs.

(12) OTHER STIMULANTS: Includes methylphenidate and any other stimulants.

(13) BENZODIAZEPINES: Includes alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, clonazepam, clorazepate, diazepam, flunitrazepam,flurazepam, halazepam, lorazepam, oxazepam, prazepam, temazepam, triazolam, and other unspecified benzodiazepines.

(14) OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS: Includes meprobamate, tranquilizers, etc.

(15) BARBITURATES: Includes amobarbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, etc.

(16) OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS: Includes chloral hydrate, ethchlorvynol, glutethimide,methaqualone, sedatives/hypnotics, etc.

(17) INHALANTS: Includes chloroform, ether, gasoline, glue, nitrous oxide, paint thinner, etc.

(18) OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATIONS: Includes aspirin, cough syrup, diphenhydramine and other anti-histamines,sleep aids, and any other legally obtained non-prescription medication.

(20) OTHER: Includes diphenylhydantoin/phenytoin, GHB/GBL, ketamine, etc.

See next page for frequency table

Page 57: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SUB3: SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (TERTIARY)

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NONE 1,024,785 63.5%

2 ALCOHOL 66,337 4.1%

3 COCAINE/CRACK 58,188 3.6%

4 MARIJUANA/HASHISH 87,634 5.4%

5 HEROIN 13,742 0.9%

6 NON-PRESCRIPTION METHADONE 2,052 0.1%

7 OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS 28,027 1.7%

8 PCP 1,771 0.1%

9 OTHER HALLUCINOGENS 4,232 0.3%

10 METHAMPHETAMINE 18,853 1.2%

11 OTHER AMPHETAMINES 6,186 0.4%

12 OTHER STIMULANTS 1,112 0.1%

13 BENZODIAZEPINES 28,708 1.8%

14 OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS 539 0.0%

15 BARBITURATES 535 0.0%

16 OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS 2,410 0.1%

17 INHALANTS 826 0.1%

18 OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATIONS 908 0.1%

20 OTHER 23,631 1.5%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 243,882 15.1%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 58: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ROUTE3: USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (TERTIARY)ROUTE3: USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (TERTIARY)

This field identifies the usual route of administration of the tertiary substance.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 ORAL 130,374 8.1%

2 SMOKING 144,267 8.9%

3 INHALATION 42,207 2.6%

4 INJECTION (IV OR INTRAMUSCULAR) 23,445 1.5%

20 OTHER 4,973 0.3%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,269,092 78.6%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 59: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

FREQ3: FREQUENCY OF USE (TERTIARY)FREQ3: FREQUENCY OF USE (TERTIARY)

Specifies the frequency of use of the tertiary substance.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 NO USE IN THE PAST MONTH 223,359 13.8%

2 1-3 TIMES IN THE PAST MONTH 53,777 3.3%

3 1-2 TIMES IN THE PAST WEEK 33,260 2.1%

4 3-6 TIMES IN THE PAST WEEK 29,094 1.8%

5 DAILY 90,783 5.6%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,184,085 73.3%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 5

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 60: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

FRSTUSE3: AGE AT FIRST USE (TERTIARY)FRSTUSE3: AGE AT FIRST USE (TERTIARY)

For drugs other than alcohol, this field identifies the age at which the client first used the substance identified as thetertiary substance. For alcohol, this field records the age of the first intoxication.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 11 AND UNDER 32,110 2.0%

2 12-14 82,124 5.1%

3 15-17 96,509 6.0%

4 18-20 56,089 3.5%

5 21-24 31,430 1.9%

6 25-29 23,067 1.4%

7 30-34 13,328 0.8%

8 35-39 7,079 0.4%

9 40-44 5,036 0.3%

10 45-49 3,114 0.2%

11 50-54 1,867 0.1%

12 55 AND OVER 1,067 0.1%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,261,538 78.1%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 12

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 61: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

NUMSUBS: NUMBER OF SUBSTANCES REPORTED AT ADM.NUMSUBS: NUMBER OF SUBSTANCES REPORTED AT ADM.

Calculates the number of substances (maximum of 3) reported at admission from primary, secondary, and tertiarysubstances of abuse (SUB1, SUB2 and SUB3).

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 0 26,032 1.6%

1 1 707,491 43.8%

2 2 538,149 33.3%

3 3 342,686 21.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 3

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 62: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

IDU: CURRENT IV DRUG USE REPORTED AT ADM.IDU: CURRENT IV DRUG USE REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if injection was reported as primary, secondary, or tertiary route of administration.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 IDU REPORTED 360,707 22.3%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,253,651 77.7%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 1

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 63: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ALCFLG: ALCOHOL REPORTED AT ADM.ALCFLG: ALCOHOL REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if alcohol was reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the time ofadmission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 776,477 48.1%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 837,881 51.9%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 64: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

COKEFLG: COCAINE/CRACK REPORTED AT ADM.COKEFLG: COCAINE/CRACK REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if cocaine or crack was reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the time ofadmission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,325,174 82.1%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 289,184 17.9%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 65: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

MARFLG: MARIJUANA/HASHISH REPORTED AT ADM.MARFLG: MARIJUANA/HASHISH REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if marijuana or hashish were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at thetime of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,036,303 64.2%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 578,055 35.8%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 66: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

HERFLG: HEROIN REPORTED AT ADM.HERFLG: HEROIN REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if heroin was reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the time ofadmission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,197,384 74.2%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 416,974 25.8%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 67: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

METHFLG: NON-RX METHADONE REPORTED AT ADM.METHFLG: NON-RX METHADONE REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if non-prescription methadone was reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse atthe time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,604,269 99.4%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 10,089 0.6%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 68: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

OPSYNFLG: OTHER OPIATES/SYNTHETICS REPORTED AT ADM.OPSYNFLG: OTHER OPIATES/SYNTHETICS REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if other opiates or synthetics were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse atthe time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,385,669 85.8%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 228,689 14.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 69: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

PCPFLG: PCP REPORTED AT ADM.PCPFLG: PCP REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if PCP was reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,604,559 99.4%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 9,799 0.6%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 70: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

HALLFLG: OTHER HALLUCINOGENS REPORTED AT ADM.HALLFLG: OTHER HALLUCINOGENS REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if other hallucinogens were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at thetime of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,605,106 99.4%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 9,252 0.6%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 71: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

MTHAMFLG: METHAMPHETAMINE REPORTED AT ADM.MTHAMFLG: METHAMPHETAMINE REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if methamphetamines were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at thetime of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,396,314 86.5%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 218,044 13.5%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 72: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

AMPHFLG: OTHER AMPHETAMINES REPORTED AT ADM.AMPHFLG: OTHER AMPHETAMINES REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if other amphetamines were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at thetime of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,591,574 98.6%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 22,784 1.4%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 73: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

STIMFLG: OTHER STIMULANTS REPORTED AT ADM.STIMFLG: OTHER STIMULANTS REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if non-prescription methadone was reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse atthe time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,611,250 99.8%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 3,108 0.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 74: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

BENZFLG: BENZODIAZEPINES REPORTED AT ADM.BENZFLG: BENZODIAZEPINES REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if benzodiazepines were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the timeof admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,519,782 94.1%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 94,576 5.9%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 75: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

TRNQFLG: OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS REPORTED AT ADM.TRNQFLG: OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substanceof abuse at the time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,612,930 99.9%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 1,428 0.1%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 76: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

BARBFLG: BARBITURATES REPORTED AT ADM.BARBFLG: BARBITURATES REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if barbiturates were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the time ofadmission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,611,912 99.8%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 2,446 0.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 77: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

SEDHPFLG: OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES/HYPNOTICS REPORTED ATADM.SEDHPFLG: OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES/HYPNOTICS REPORTED ATADM.

Flags record if other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiarysubstance of abuse at the time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,606,665 99.5%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 7,693 0.5%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 78: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

INHFLG: INHALANTS REPORTED AT ADM.INHFLG: INHALANTS REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if inhalants were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the time ofadmission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,611,985 99.9%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 2,373 0.1%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 79: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

OTCFLG: OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATION REPORTED AT ADM.OTCFLG: OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATION REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if over-the-counter medications were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuseat the time of admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,611,271 99.8%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 3,087 0.2%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 80: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

OTHERFLG: OTHER DRUG REPORTED AT ADM.OTHERFLG: OTHER DRUG REPORTED AT ADM.

Flags record if other substances were reported as the primary, secondary, or tertiary substance of abuse at the timeof admission.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 1,551,261 96.1%

1 SUBSTANCE REPORTED 63,097 3.9%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1

Width: 1; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 81: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

ALCDRUG: SUBSTANCE ABUSE TYPEALCDRUG: SUBSTANCE ABUSE TYPE

Classifies client's substance abuse type as alcohol only, other drugs only, alcohol and other drugs, or none. Thisvariable looks across primary, secondary, and tertiary substances of abuse reported at the time of admission totreatment.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 NONE 26,032 1.6%

1 ALCOHOL ONLY 327,673 20.3%

2 OTHER DRUGS ONLY 750,445 46.5%

3 ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS 510,208 31.6%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 3

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 82: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

DSMCRIT: DSM DIAGNOSISDSMCRIT: DSM DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis of the substance abuse problem from the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and StatisticalManual of Mental Disorders. DSM IV is preferred, but use of the third Edition, or ICD codes is permissible. If the DSMIV is not used, the state must specify the coding system in the state crosswalk.

The discrete diagnosis codes have been recoded into categories related to abuse of and dependence on specificsubstances, mental health conditions, and other conditions.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

0 NO DIAGNOSIS 8,163 0.5%

1 ALCOHOL-INDUCED DISORDER 4,218 0.3%

2 SUBSTANCE-INDUCED DISORDER 18,533 1.1%

3 ALCOHOL INTOXICATION 51,541 3.2%

4 ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE 132,334 8.2%

5 OPIOID DEPENDENCE 145,589 9.0%

6 COCAINE DEPENDENCE 23,028 1.4%

7 CANNABIS DEPENDENCE 51,531 3.2%

8 OTHER SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCE 72,460 4.5%

9 ALCOHOL ABUSE 47,098 2.9%

10 CANNABIS ABUSE 38,613 2.4%

11 OTHER SUBSTANCE ABUSE 9,682 0.6%

12 OPIOID ABUSE 6,350 0.4%

13 COCAINE ABUSE 5,643 0.3%

14 ANXIETY DISORDERS 2,762 0.2%

15 DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS 5,923 0.4%

16 SCHIZOPHRENIA / OTHER PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS 1,665 0.1%

17 BIPOLAR DISORDERS 3,160 0.2%

18 ATTENTION DEFICIT / DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR DISORDERS 744 0.0%

19 OTHER MENTAL HEALTH CONDITION 3,760 0.2%

20 OTHER CONDITION 7,931 0.5%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 973,630 60.3%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 20

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 83: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

PSYPROB: PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEM IN ADDITION TO ALCOHOL/DRUG PROBLEMPSYPROB: PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEM IN ADDITION TO ALCOHOL/DRUG PROBLEM

Indicates whether the client has a psychiatric problem in addition to his or her alcohol or drug use problem.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 YES 417,601 25.9%

2 NO 784,900 48.6%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 411,857 25.5%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 84: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

HLTHINS: HEALTH INSURANCEHLTHINS: HEALTH INSURANCE

Specifies the client's health insurance (if any). The insurance may or may not cover alcohol or drug treatment.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 PRIVATE INSURANCE, BC/BS, HMO 107,295 6.6%

2 MEDICAID 180,940 11.2%

3 MEDICARE, OTHER (E.G. TRICARE, CHAMPUS) 74,738 4.6%

4 NONE 308,741 19.1%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 942,644 58.4%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 4

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 85: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

PRIMPAY: EXPECTED/ACTUAL PRIMARY SOURCE OF PAYMENTPRIMPAY: EXPECTED/ACTUAL PRIMARY SOURCE OF PAYMENT

Identifies the primary source of payment for this treatment episode.

Guidelines: States operating under a split payment fee arrangement between multiple payment sources are to defaultto the payment source with the largest percentage. When payment percentages are equal, the State can select eithersource.

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

1 SELF-PAY 65,994 4.1%

2 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD, OTHER HEALTH INSURANCE COM 29,770 1.8%

3 MEDICARE, WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4,230 0.3%

4 MEDICAID 123,148 7.6%

5 OTHER GOVERNMENT PAYMENTS 232,032 14.4%

8 NO CHARGE (FREE, CHARITY, SPECIAL RESEARCH, TEACHI 25,752 1.6%

9 OTHER 52,295 3.2%

-9 MISSING/UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/INVALID 1,081,137 67.0%

Total 1,614,358 100%

• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 9

Width: 2; Decimal: 0Variable Type: numeric

Page 86: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

APPENDIX A

TEDS-A Variable Information (Alphabetical Order)

Variable

AGE

Source3

MDS

Type

Num

Len

8

Label

AGE (RECODED)

ALCDRUG Added Num 8 SUBSTANCE ABUSE TYPE ALCFLG Added Num 8 ALCOHOL REPORTED AT ADM. AMPHFLG Added Num 8 OTHER AMPHETAMINES REPORTED AT ADM. ARRESTS SuDS Num 8 NUMBER OF ARRESTS IN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO ADMISSION BARBFLG Added Num 8 BARBITURATES REPORTED AT ADM. BENZFLG Added Num 8 BENZODIAZEPINES REPORTED AT ADM. CASEID Added Num 8 CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CBSA Added Num 8 FIPS 2015 CBSA CODE COKEFLG Added Num 8 COCAINE/CRACK REPORTED AT ADM. DAYWAIT SuDS Num 8 DAYS WAITING TO ENTER TREATMENT DETCRIM SuDS Num 8 DETAILED CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRAL DETNLF SuDS Num 8 DETAILED 'NOT IN LABOR FORCE' CATEGORY DIVISION Added Num 8 CENSUS DIVISION DSMCRIT SuDS Num 8 DSM DIAGNOSIS EDUC MDS Num 8 EDUCATION EMPLOY MDS Num 8 EMPLOYMENT STATUS ETHNIC MDS Num 8 ETHNICITY (HISPANIC ORIGIN) FREQ1 MDS Num 8 FREQUENCY OF USE (PRIMARY) FREQ2 MDS Num 8 FREQUENCY OF USE (SECONDARY) FREQ3 MDS Num 8 FREQUENCY OF USE (TERTIARY) FRSTUSE1 MDS Num 8 AGE AT FIRST USE (PRIMARY) FRSTUSE2 MDS Num 8 AGE AT FIRST USE (SECONDARY) FRSTUSE3 MDS Num 8 AGE AT FIRST USE (TERTIARY) GENDER MDS Num 8 SEX HALLFLG Added Num 8 OTHER HALLUCINOGENS REPORTED AT ADM. HERFLG Added Num 8 HEROIN REPORTED AT ADM. HLTHINS SuDS Num 8 HEALTH INSURANCE IDU Added Num 8 CURRENT IV DRUG USE REPORTED AT ADM. INHFLG Added Num 8 INHALANTS REPORTED AT ADM. LIVARAG SuDS Num 8 LIVING ARRANGEMENT MARFLG Added Num 8 MARIJUANA/HASHISH REPORTED AT ADM. MARSTAT SuDS Num 8 MARITAL STATUS METHFLG Added Num 8 NON-RX METHADONE REPORTED AT ADM. METHUSE MDS Num 8 MEDICATION-ASSISTED OPIOID THERAPY MTHAMFLG Added Num 8 METHAMPHETAMINE REPORTED AT ADM. NOPRIOR MDS Num 8 NUMBER OF PRIOR TREATMENT EPISODES NUMSUBS Added Num 8 NUMBER OF SUBSTANCES REPORTED AT ADM. OPSYNFLG Added Num 8 OTHER OPIATES/SYNTHETICS REPORTED AT ADM. OTCFLG Added Num 8 OVER-THE-COUNTER MEDICATION REPORTED AT ADM. OTHERFLG Added Num 8 OTHER DRUG REPORTED AT ADM. PCPFLG Added Num 8 PCP REPORTED AT ADM. PREG SuDS Num 8 PREGNANT AT TIME OF ADMISSION PRIMINC SuDS Num 8 SOURCE OF INCOME/SUPPORT PRIMPAY SuDS Num 8 EXPECTED/ACTUAL PRIMARY SOURCE OF PAYMENT PSOURCE MDS Num 8 PRINCIPAL SOURCE OF REFERRAL PSYPROB SuDS Num 8 PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEM IN ADDITION TO ALCOHOL/DRUG PROBLEM RACE MDS Num 8 RACE REGION Added Num 8 CENSUS REGION

Page 87: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

Variable

ROUTE1

Source3

MDS

Type

Num

Len

8

Label

USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (PRIMARY)

ROUTE2 MDS Num 8 USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (SECONDARY) ROUTE3 MDS Num 8 USUAL ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION (TERTIARY) SEDHPFLG Added Num 8 OTHER NON-BARBITURATE SEDATIVES/HYPNOTICS REPORTED AT ADM. SERVSETA MDS Num 8 SERVICE SETTING AT ADMISSION STFIPS Added Num 8 CENSUS STATE FIPS CODE STIMFLG Added Num 8 OTHER STIMULANTS REPORTED AT ADM. SUB1 MDS Num 8 SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (PRIMARY) SUB2 MDS Num 8 SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (SECONDARY) SUB3 MDS Num 8 SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM (TERTIARY) TRNQFLG Added Num 8 OTHER NON-BENZODIAZEPINE TRANQUILIZERS REPORTED AT ADM. VET SuDS Num 8 VETERAN STATUS YEAR Added Num 8 YEAR OF ADMISSION

3 MDS = Minimum Data Set SuDS = Supplemental Data Set Added = Variable Added to TEDS

Page 88: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

APPENDIX B

Variable Recode Table

Variable Original Codes (original percentage) Recodes AGE

Age at Admission

Continuous (0-95) 2 12-14 years old 3 15-17 years old

4 18-20 years old 5 21-24 years old

6 25-29 years old

7 30-34 years old 8 35-39 years old

9 40-44 years old 10 45-49 years old

11 50-54 years old

12 55-95 years old

ARRESTS Number of Arrests Prior

to Admission

Continuous (0-96) 0 None 1 Once

2 Two or More Times

MARSTAT Marital Status

1 Never Married (65.2%) 2 Now Married (13.7%)

3 Separated (5.6%)

4 Divorced (13.7%)

5 Widowed (1.9%)

1 Never Married 2 Now Married

3 Separated

4 Divorced, Widowed

EDUC Education

Continuous (0-25) 1 8 Years or Less 2 9-11

3 12

4 13-15

5 16 or More

Page 89: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

Variable Original Codes (original percentage) Recodes

DETNLF Detailed ‘Not in Labor’ Force

1 Homemaker (3.0%) 2 Student (12.4%)

3 Retired (3.0%)

4 Disabled (23.8%)

5 Inmate of Institution (5.8%)

6 Other (52.0%)

1 Homemaker 2 Student

3 Retired, Disabled

5 Inmate of Institution

6 Other

PRIMINC Source of Income / Support

1 Wages/Salary (28.1%) 2 Public Assistance (9.7%)

3 Retirement/Pension (<1%)

4 Disability (5.9%)

20 Other (19.4%)

21 None (36.2%)

1 Wages/Salary 2 Public Assistance

3 Retirement/Pension, Disability

20 Other

21 None

CBSA

FIPS 2015 CBSA Code

Census CBSA geographic codes Codes for undesignated area and missing data combined into a single specification.

When CBSA describes a population less than

100,000, or one of the codes falls into the

combined missing category, records are

recoded into:

“UNDESIGNATED AREA /MISSING/

UNKNOWN/NOT COLLECTED/ INVALID”

DETCRIM Detailed Criminal Justice Referral

1 State/Federal Court (16.1%) 2 Other Court (11.3%)

3 Probation/Parole (33.3%)

4 Other Recognized Legal Entity (7.7%)

5 Diversionary Program (2.8%)

6 Prison (2.2%)

7 DUI/DWI (10.7%)

8 Other (15.9%)

1 State/Federal Court, Other Court 3 Probation/Parole

5 Diversionary Program

6 Prison

7 DUI/DWI

8 Other Recognized Legal Entity, Other

Page 90: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

Variable Original Codes (original percentage) Recodes

HLTHINS Health Insurance

1 Private Insurance (Other Than BC/BS or HMO) (6.8%)

2 Blue Cross / Blue Shield (BC/BS) (5.0%)

3 Medicare (1.8%)

4 Medicaid (27.0%)

6 Health Maintenance Organization

(HMO) (4.2%)

20 Other (e.g. TriCare, Champus) (9.3%)

21 None (45.9%)

1 Private Insurance, BC/BS, HMO 2 Medicaid

3 Medicare/Other (e.g. Tricare, Champus)

4 None

PRIMPAY Expected/Actual Payment Source

of Payment

1 Self-Pay (12.4%) 2 Blue Cross / Blue Shield (1.9%)

3 Medicare (0.8%)

4 Medicaid (23.1%)

5 Other Government Payments (43.5%)

6 Worker’s Compensation (<1%)

7 Other Health Insurance Companies (3.7%)

8 No charge (Free, Charity, Special

Research or Teaching) (4.8%)

9 Other (9.8%)

1 Self-Pay 2 Blue Cross / Blue Shield, Other Health

Insurance Companies

3 Medicare, Worker’s Compensation

4 Medicaid

5 Other Government Payments

8 No charge (Free, Charity, Special

Research or Teaching)

9 Other

FRSTUSE1 Age at First Use (Primary)

FRSTUSE2

Age at First Use (Secondary)

FRSTUSE3

Age at First Use (Tertiary)

Continuous (0-95) 11 and Under 12-14

15-17

18-20

21-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55 and Over

Page 91: Treatment Episode Data Set Admissions (TEDS-A), 2014 · 1 Subs tance Abuse and Me nal H e alh Serv ices d mstr on, Offi of pp ed S ud es. Tre ent Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-1997

Variable Original Codes (original percentage) Recodes DSMCRIT

DSM Diagnosis

0.00 0 No Diagnosis

291.00 – 291.99 1 Alcohol-Induced Disorder

292.00 – 292.99 2 Substance-Induced Disorder

303.00 – 303.89 3 Alcohol Intoxication

303.90 – 303.99 4 Alcohol Dependence

304.00 – 304.09 5 Opioid Dependence

304.20 – 304.29 6 Cocaine Dependence

304.30 – 304.39 7 Cannabis Dependence

304.10 – 304.19, 304.40 – 304.99, 305.10 – 305.19

8 Other Substance Abuse Dependence

305.00 – 305.09 9 Alcohol Abuse

305.20 – 305.29 10 Cannabis Abuse

305.30 – 305.49, 305.70 – 305.99 11 Other Substance Abuse

305.50 – 305.59 12 Opioid Abuse

305.60 – 305.69 13 Cocaine Abuse

293.89, 300.00 – 300.02, 300.21 – 300.23, 300.29 – 300.39, 308.30 – 308.39, 309.81

14 Anxiety Disorders

296.20 – 296.39, 300.40 – 300.49, 311.00 – 311.09

15 Depressive Disorders

293.81 – 293.82, 295.00 – 295.99, 297.10 – 297.19, 297.30 – 297.39,

298.80 – 298.89, 298.90 – 298.99

16 Schizophrenic / Other Psychotic Disorders

296.00 – 296.09, 296.40 – 296.79, 296.80, 296.89, 301.13

17 Bipolar Disorders

312.80 – 312.81, 312.90 – 312.99, 313.81, 314.00 – 314.01, 314.90 – 314.99

18 Attention Deficit / Disruptive Behavior Disorders

All other codes 19 Other Mental Health Condition

.01 – 289.99, 320 – 997.99, V-codes, E-codes 20 Other Condition

999.97 – 999.99 -9 Missing