ttl/ls vs. cmos reliability & neutron radiation

15
TTL/LS vs. CMOS TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation.

Upload: ashtyn-stallsworth

Post on 31-Mar-2015

236 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

TTL/LS vs. CMOSTTL/LS vs. CMOS

Reliability & Neutron Radiation.

Page 2: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

What’s really going onWhat’s really going on

This study has taken two common types of semiconductors and tested to see which is

more reliable after exposure to neutron radiation.

Page 3: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

TTL/LS explainedTTL/LS explained Transistor Transistor

Logic / Low-Power Schottky.

These chips have gates constructed of bipolar transistors using low internal voltages.

Uses 80% less power than TTL.

Page 4: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

CMOS explainedCMOS explainedComplementary Metal Oxide

Semiconductor.Uses metal oxide semiconductor field effect

transistors (MOSFETs) instead of bipolar transistors.

Highest number of transistors per unit area.

Page 5: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

Irradiation procedureIrradiation procedure

The chips were irradiated using the U.M.R. nuclear reactor. The gate's accuracy was determined and logged using a system of my own design. Next, The chips were irradiated again for a set interval of time, tested, and repeated until the chips failed.

Page 6: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

How are they irradiated?How are they irradiated?

First the chips are sealed in vials. Next the vials are loaded into the BRT (Bare Rabbit

Tube.) The reactor operator then activates the BRT sending

the vial down into the core. This time from the surface to the core is under .5 sec.

The chips stay down by the core for a set time and then are automatically pulled back up after the time has elapsed.

The chips are then put into storage until testing.

Page 7: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

The “Rabbit Cage”The “Rabbit Cage” The “Rabbit Cage” is where vials are loaded into the BRT. Uses a slight vacuum to keep radioactive dust, etc from

escaping. Constantly monitored so that if a specimen is “too hot” it

can be sent back into the pool to “cool off.”

Page 8: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

The BRTThe BRT These pipes carry the vials into the core. The BRT uses nitrogen gas to propel the vials. This tube is unshielded. The other is the “Cad Rabbit,” It

is used to allow only “slow neutrons” through.

Page 9: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

And the CoreAnd the Core The Core is at the very bottom of the

pool. The Core configuration is Red =

fuel, Green = control rods, and the white rabbit is where the chips were.

Page 10: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

Testing the ChipsTesting the Chips Using a microcontroller called the Basic

Stamp 2, running a program written by myself, to test the chips accuracy by testing

each gate hundreds of times.

Page 11: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

Testing by the NumbersTesting by the Numbers

The program can run tests a maximum of 65,000 times per gate per input type per chip.

• 4 gates per chip.• 4 input types per gate.

65,000 x 4 x 4 = 1,040,000 tests per chip.

Page 12: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

The ResultsThe Results

The graph shows the total number of gates that failed in each group and the exposure that the gates had when they failed. No TTL/LS gates failed, however the CMOS gates became very unreliable. Twenty gates were tested per group with four groups.

Page 13: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

And the Conclusion is ...And the Conclusion is ...

TTL/LS is better hardened against radiation than CMOS.

Page 14: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

Special Thanks to…Special Thanks to… Dr. Akira Tokuhiro, UMR reactor director; for allowing me to do this

project and for introducing me to the Nuclear Engineering Department Mr. Kurt Koch, UMR Physics Student; his time and patients in

explaining to me what could and could not be done at the reactor, allowing me to use his computer account, and for allowing me to use the Society of Physics Students room at the Physics building.

Brian Porter, UMR reactor electronics specialist; for supervising me while I was at the reactor.

William Bonzer, UMR reactor manager; for allowing me the necessary time at the UMR reactor

UMR Society of Physics Students; for using their facilities during my summer stay at UMR

Mrs. Connie Henry; my Science Research and College Chemistry instructor.

My Parents for their patience and support.

Page 15: TTL/LS vs. CMOS Reliability & Neutron Radiation

The EndThe End

Thank you very much:

Kevin JohnsonWest Plains Missouri

2002 Rolla ISEF