ttt report in mru library - mykolo romerio universitetas · 2013-10-10 · 2 report on scientific...
TRANSCRIPT
MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
USER BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS IN MYKOLAS ROMERIS
UNIVERSITY LIBRARY USING TTT METHOD
Research report
Vilnius, 2013
2
Report on scientific research
“User behavior analysis in Mykolas Romeris university library using TTT method”
Research done and report prepared by:
Mykolas Romeris university head librarian Albertas Olechnovičius
Thank associate professor Tord Hoivik at Oslo and Akershus university college for
supervising the research; lecturer Gintarė Paražinskaitė and head librarian Natalija Popkova at
Mykolas Romeris university for contributing to the research; Mykolas Romeris university library
personnel: Milda Šakytė, Dalia Matijošaitytė, Irena Lazdovskaja, Aida Klevinskienė, Elena
Lučinskienė, Gražina Rozencevaitė, Jurgita Kukytė, Audronė Karlonienė, Nijolė Sorakienė, Nijolė
Urbienė, Kristina Vaitonienė, Rozalija Sidunienė, Vilija Ulienė, Nijolė Bražėnienė, Liudmila
Bernotienė for gathering data in library areas.
3
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4
2. Aims of the study ..................................................................................................................................... 4
3. About TTT method .................................................................................................................................. 5
4. Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 6
5. TTT method in MRU library ................................................................................................................... 17
5.1. About MRU library .............................................................................................................................. 17
5.2. Statistical data collection in MRU library .......................................................................................... 19
5.3. Preparation for the observations ......................................................................................................... 20
5.4. Observation of Users’ Activities in MRU Library .............................................................................. 25
5.5. Collected data processing .................................................................................................................... 25
5.6. Findings of the Research..................................................................................................................... 27
Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 30
References ...................................................................................................................................................... 31
Appendix 1. Users’ activities data registering table. .................................................................................. 32
Appendix 2. Observations sheet. .................................................................................................................. 33
Appendix 3. Week sheet. ............................................................................................................................... 34
Appendix 4. Day sheet. .................................................................................................................................. 35
Appendix 5. Activities sheet. ......................................................................................................................... 36
4
1. Introduction
Traditional teaching takes place in classrooms and lecture halls. Additionally, students study
on their own either at home or in the university library. Students are not the only users - the
academic staff are also often visitors of the alma mater knowledge department. So processes of
study and scientific research happen here. It is interesting and librarians need to know, what is
happening in the field of higher education and especially in their libraries.
Every library tries to provide qualitative services and to meet its users’ needs. To achieve this
goal library needs to know it‘s user before developing and improving physical environment and
services. It is paradoxical that the librarians, who are the specialists of information searching,
retrieval, structuring and delivering to the users, have very little systematic information on users‘
activities inside the libraries. They are not familiar with structural and systematic research on the
performance of their libraries. Usage of ordinary methods for gathering library statistics does not
reveal the full view of what users are doing in the library. TTT or „Test the Traffic“ is a cheap and
simple method to know such information.
This report has been done on the scientific research “User behavior analysis in Mykolas
Romeris university library using TTT method” and the research was carried out in Mykolas
Romeris University1 Central building Library in 2013. The research came with a seminar and a
workshop LATINA Post-IT 20132, which took place at Mykolas Romeris university library in May,
2013.
The mission of Mykolas Romeris university (hereinafter – MRU) library is to provide world-
class informational resources and information services in support of the education, learning and
research needs of the University community, foster University academics' and administrative staff
informational literacy and critical evaluation skills, and adopt, develop and implement cutting-edge
and modern library services and technologies. Besides using traditional methods of gathering
statistical data MRU library seeks to know more about its users, processes and activities by
applying new and advanced methods as TTT.
2. Aims of the study
Librarians have little systematic information on users‘ activities inside their libraries. It is
paradoxical that librarians, who are specialists of information searching, retrieval, structuring and
delivering to users, are not familiar with structural and systematic research on the performance of
1 Mykolas Romeris university. http://www.mruni.eu [accessed on 4/10/2013] 2 LATINA POST-IT 2013. http://akkordio.net/postit/ [accessed on 4/10/2013]
5
their libraries. They usually use ordinary statistics and methods for its gathering: questionnaires,
surveys, visitor counting, acquisition of materials, number of queries per period, statistics of the
electronic resources and their usage, interlibrary loan, statistics from the library‘s electronic
catalogue software, number of trainings and participants, provided services, etc.
To improve the quality of services for all users, MRU library aims to:
create friendly and attractive informational, physical and emotional environment for the
academic community,
provide efficient services for all library users,
create a user-centered range of services for University students and staff to maintain a
close understanding of their needs,
provide maximum access to the library, including admission to the library building itself
24x7 and remote access to the electronic resources,
promote the use of the library as a learning and research tool,
provide tailored services for the users with disabilities,
encourage and support permanent qualification of the library staff.
Besides using traditional methods of gathering library statistics, the usage of TTT method
would reveal user behavior inside the library through their activities in the library zones. This
technique:
is a new approach for gathering library statistics,
gives a good view of what users are doing mostly in the library,
reveals the occupation of the library floors and zones,
shows the quantity of users at different times,
let evaluate the physical and technical base of the library,
is a new tool for the library space planning.
By using TTT MRU library seeks to know more what is happening inside for the purpose of
the improvement of the library activities.
3. About TTT method
The TTT project (Test the Traffic, Time the Traffic or Track the Traffic), was previously
called CTT or Count the Traffic. In Norwegian, the project has always been labeled TTT. The
Norwegian acronym stands for Tverrgående Trafikktelling (“transversal traffic counting”). TTT is a
cheap and simple method to gather data about users‘ activities in the library. It gives a good
numerical access of what they are doing in the library and how library users actually use the various
6
parts of the library. TTT reveals both the quality - or the kinds of activity – and the quantity of use.
Combined with data on the number of visitors it will also indicate the average length of stay.3
The TTT method was first tried out at Oslo Public library in 2004 and at Gjerdrum Public
library in 2005. Gjerdrum is a small community of five thousand inhabitants thirty kilometers north
of Oslo. In the period 2008-11 students collected TTT data from nearly one hundred Norwegian
libraries. In addition, full scale traffic counts have been carried out by library staff in:
Lillehammer Public Library
Drammen Public Library
Ostfold University College
Gjovik University College
Tromso Public Library
Nedre Eiker Public Library
Ovre Eiker Public Library
During their second-year practicum period, Oslo University College library students carried
out small projects4 in the libraries to which they were assigned. A first report on the results, access
based on Drammen Public library, was presented at the IFLA conference in Quebec in 20085. A
more extensive report, based on the public library data from 2008 and 2009, was presented at the
Northumbria conference in Florence in August 2009. The method has also been presented at
workshops in Stellenbosch (South Africa) and Porto (Portugal). In the spring 2009 three Erasmus
students did a comprehensive study of student activities at the Oslo University College Learning
Centre.6
4. Methodology
Here will be given basic methodology on TTT research in this chapter. The detailed
description of the TTT research, carried out at MRU library, will be presented in chapter 5.
3 Hoivik T. Track The Traffic. A new approach to user behavior. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qJI4v4JqT9yffo_b22IjfnLAbRzmuIKO9EZXVeJGt9Q/edit?usp=sharing [accessed 4/10/2013] 4 Arango A. M., Escobar C. and Molnár A. 2009. Students in action: An observation study of the Oslo University College Learning Centre. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tEnRk9i5stiUnQ5OdYIB9N5I5MHPQMrVYdZTXND-7V0/preview?pli=1 [accessed 4/10/2013] 5 Hoivik T. 2008. Count the Traffic. World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General Conference and Council. http://mogadorebranch.akronlibrary.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/19/files/2011/07/Count-the-traffic.pdf [accessed 4/10/2013] 6 Practical statistics. https://sites.google.com/site/practicalstatistics/topics/ttt-method [accessed 16/07/2013]
7
As it was mentioned above, TTT is a cheap and simple method to gather data about users‘
activities in the library. It gives a good numerical access of what they are doing in the library and
how library users actually use the various parts of the library.
To carry out a TTT, researcher needs:
a time plan with dates and times for all observation rounds,
a library floor plan covering (all the public areas of the library),
a plan should be divided into functional zones (information desk area, book area, leisure
area, computer area, etc.),
a list of activities to be observed.
It is recommendable to adapt the standardized TTT list of activities for the possibility to
compare gathered data between libraries.7
Time Plan
It is important to make a time plan with dates and times for all observation rounds. There are
some circumstances at this point: size and type of the library, human resources for registering user‘s
activities, library working hours, days, when the library is closed, holiday, weekends and other.
When deciding the dates of observations, it is better to set the whole working week. Some
events could make impact on the number of visitors: holiday, sport events, national celebrations,
etc. The times of observations depend on the working hours of the library.
The periodicity of observations should 1 or 2 hours, but not longer. This will give the better
view on whose hours library has more users and whose activities are the most popular.
Library Floors
Important thing is to do a library floor plan covering with all the public areas of the library,
where users do their activities. The plan should be divided into functional zones, where each zone
has a color and a letter code.
Researcher additionally can measure the area of each zone, count the number of seats and
stationary computers. Comparing these numbers with a visitors‘ number of that zone at that time
will show, if it is enough space at that zone for the library users.
Library Zones
You can see general functional zones with the letter codes in the Table 1. Different colors
should be assigned to each zone.
7 Practical statistics. https://sites.google.com/site/practicalstatistics/topics/ttt-method [accessed 4/10/2013]
8
Table 1. Library zones, letter codes and zone colors.
Letter codes and zone color Zones
A Information desk zones
B Computer zones
C Sitting down zones
D Periodicals zones
E Book zones
F Group rooms zones
G Photocopier and printer zones
H Silent zones
I Leisure zones
L Hall zones
Every library can use less or more zones depending on its particularity.
Users’ Activities
There will be given description of user activities below. As it was mentioned above, it is
recommended to use standardized list of activities for the possibility to compare the data between
the libraries. The list of the main activities with short description is in the Table 2 below, but
libraries can add other activities too.8
Table 2. Activities and letter codes.
Letter codes Activities
ALUP Walks or stands alone. Covers standing or walking around without browsing and without
relating to library staff or other users.
ALBR Browses alone. Covers browsing or scanning of items on shelves while standing or walking
around. Includes watching exhibitions.
ALSI Sits alone. Sits alone without relating to media, to library staff or to other users.
ALMD Sits alone reading (or writing). Sits and reads by her/himself. Includes individual work –
reading and or writing – without using data equipment. Includes listening to music, watching
videos and using other media – but not the use of computers.
ALLT Sits alone with laptop. Sits alone with active mobile or tablet computer (active screen).
ALPC Sits alone with stationary computer. Sits alone with stationary active computer (active screen).
ALSF Individual contact with staff. Covers all direct contact with staff. Here we want to register
activities where staff spends time with an individual user, whether it involves speaking, writing,
demonstrating or walking around.
8 Hoivik T. 2012. Students at work: Traffic observation in academic libraries. Paper for the SCECSAL Conference, Nairobi, June 4-8. https://docs.google.com/document/d/12s2wiXkTn-Pn0IxnYoPSTAPPlqBcFXwp3dAYVR1LXhs/edit?pli=1#heading=h.zfw9llaostwx [accessed 4/10/2013]
9
GRUP Walks or stands in company. Participates in a group of two or more persons that stands or
walks around without browsing and without relating to library staff.
GRBR Browses in company. Participates in a group of two or more persons that browse or scan items
on shelves together while standing or walking around.
GRSI Sits in a group without media. Participates in a group of two or more persons without relating
to computers, books, and other media or to library staff.
GRMD Sits in a group with media. Participates in a group without active computer, where at least one
person relates to books or other media.
GRLT Sits in a group with laptop(s). Participates in a group where at least one person is using a
mobile PC (active screen).
GRPC Sits in a group with stationary computer(s). Participates in a group of two or more persons that
is using one or more stationary PCs (active screen).
GRSF Group contact with staff. Covers all direct contact with staff. Here we want to access activities
where staff spends time with a group of several users, whether it involves speaking, writing,
demonstrating or walking around.
QUE Queuing. Covers all visible waiting for service or facilities, whether in a proper line or not:
waiting for staff, waiting for access to equipment, toilet queues, etc.
ETC Other activities. Activities not covered by the other categories.
A wider explanation of the activities (all the pictures were taken in Mykolas Romeris
university library with the users’ permission) is given below.
Walks or stands alone (ALUP)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
This activity is registered when a person is walking or standing alone in some place of the
library without browsing and without relating to library staff or other users. In some cases it is
difficult to distinguish walking or standing from browsing. If the user is in the bookshelves zone we
decide to code it as activity „Browses alone“. Also this activity covers talking over the cell phone.
10
Browses alone (ALBR)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
Activity „Browses alone“ is observed in the library areas with shelves (zones D and E), also
includes watching exhibitions. It is registered when an individual is scanning library materials. If
user is searching the library electronic catalogue we code it as „Sits alone with laptop“ or „Sits
alone with stationary computer“, because we do not observe what library users are doing with the
computers.
Sits alone (ALSI)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
This activity is registered when a user is sitting down without using any tool (laptop, library
PC, mobile phone, etc.) or media (book, journal, etc.) and has no relation to other users or library
staff. This activity is observed there are tables and chairs (zones C and H mainly).
11
Sits alone reading or writing (ALMD)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
This activity is registered when a user does individual work without using data equipment: is
sitting alone with papers, books or/and periodicals and also if a user sits with MP3 player or any
other audio or video player (not the computer) and is reading or writing. If a user is sitting alone
with a laptop or library PC, we code it as „Sits alone with laptop“ or „Sits alone with stationary
computer“. This activity is usually observed in the sitting down zones: wherever there are tables and
chairs (zones C and H mainly).
Sits alone with a laptop (ALLT)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
We register this activity when a library user sits alone with a laptop, mobile or tablet computer
(with the active screen) in the Mykolas Romeris university library. This activity is usually observed
wherever there are tables and chairs (zones C and H mainly).
This activity should be registered without distinction whether a person uses his own laptop or
it is taken from the library laptop lending service if a library has one.
12
Sits alone with stationary computer (ALPC)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
Activity „Sits alone with stationary computer“ is registered when a user is using a library‘s
stationary computer or a terminal regardless he/she is sitting or standing. This activity is observed in
the computers zones (zone B).
If a user is using both a stationary computer/a terminal and a laptop at the same time, we
attribute this to activity „Sits alone with a laptop“, because we give priority to the usage of laptops.
Individual contact with staff (ALSF)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
This activity covers all direct contact with staff where library staff spends time with an
individual user, whether it involves speaking, writing, demonstrating or walking around. Mykolas
Romeris university library has a Department of user services, so users of the library can always find
a consulting librarian at the entrance to the library, at the Information desk on the 2nd floor, in the
Grand and Longish reading rooms, in the Lending department. This activity is based on the
interaction of one user with the library staff and is usually observed at the information desks (zone
A).
13
A problem is that no consultations could happen during the counting of users‘ activities in the
library (we do it every 2 hours), so we decided to count every consultation through the period
between observation rounds.
Walks or stands in company (GRUP)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
We register this activity when library users participate in a group of two or more persons those
who stand or walk around in the library without browsing and without relating to library staff. In
some cases it is difficult to distinguish walking or standing from browsing. If the group is in the
bookshelves zone we decide to code it as activity „Browses in company“.
Browses in company (GRBR)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
Activity „Browses in company“ includes library users participating in a group of two or more
persons that browse or scan library materials on shelves together while standing or walking around,
also includes watching exhibitions in a group. If users are searching the library electronic catalogue
we code it as „Sits in a group with laptop(s)“ or „Sits in a group with stationary computer(s)“,
because we do not observe what library users are doing with the computers. This activity is
observed in the shelves and exhibition areas (zones D and E mainly).
14
Sits in a group without media (GRSI)
© Milda Pakulytė
Library users participate in a group of two or more persons without relating to computers,
books, periodicals and other media or to library staff. Also this activity is registered if there is a
group with media on the table, but users are not interacting with it, or with a computer (switched off
or inactive screen). Users are in the sitting down zones (zones C, F, H and I mainly) talking,
discussing or spending free time before or after work time.
Sits in a group with media (GRMD)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
This activity is registered when a group of 2 or more users participate without active
computer, where at least one person relates to papers, books, periodicals or other media. If at least
one member of the group is interacting with a computer, activity is registered as „Sits in a group
with laptop(s)“ or „Sits in a group with stationary computer(s)“. This activity is usually observed
wherever there are tables and chairs (zones C, F and H mainly).
15
Sits in a group with laptop(s) (GRLT)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
A group of library users of 2 or more persons are using at least 1 laptop, tablet or other mobile
computer with an active screen. This activity should be registered without distinction whether users
are using their own laptop or it is taken from the library laptop lending service if a library has one.
Users work in a group with mobile computers wherever there are tables and chairs (zones C, F, and
H mainly).
Sits in a group with stationary computer(s) (GRPC)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
Activity „Sits alone with stationary computer“ is registered when a group of 2 or more users
are using at least 1 library‘s stationary computer or a terminal with active screen regardless users
are sitting or standing. This activity is observed in the computers zones (zone B).
If a group is with a stationary computer and a laptop using both, we place them in activity
„Sits in a group with laptop(s)“, because we give priority to the usage of laptops.
16
Group contact with staff (GRSF)
© Milda Pakulytė
This activity covers all direct contact with staff where library staff spends time with a group of
2 or more users, whether it involves speaking, writing, demonstrating or walking around. It was
mentioned with activity „Individual contact with staff“ that users can always find a consulting
librarian at the entrance to the library, at the Information desk on the 2nd floor, in the Grand and
Longish reading rooms, in the Lending department. This activity is based on the interaction of a
group of users with the library staff and is usually observed at the information desks (zone A). User
training also are included here.
A problem is that no consultations could happen during the counting of users‘ activities in the
library (it was done every 2 hours in MRU library), so it was decided to count every consultation
through the period between observation rounds.
Queuing (QUE)
© Gintarė Paražinskaitė
Activity „Queuing“ covers all visible waiting for service or facilities, whether in a proper line
or not. A user or group of users is waiting for being helped or use some service, machine or space.
This activity includes waiting for staff, waiting for access to equipment, toilet queues, etc. This
activity is usually observed at the information desk, the printer/photocopier and the books check-out
machine (zones A and G mainly).
Users in a queue sometimes talk to each other and could sometimes be considered as a group,
but we register them individually, not as a group.
17
Other activities (ETC)
© Milda Pakulytė
This one includes the activities not covered by the other categories. We register this activity
when a user or a group of users is not engaged in any of the activities described above. The main
guideline is when a user is doing something not as usual as the other activities in Mykolas Romeris
university library. Examples of „Other activities“ are printing, copying, using the books check-out
machine, playing leisure games, buying coffee, pouring water, sleeping, etc.
5. TTT method in MRU library
The TTT method was firstly used in Norway, Oslo Public Library in 2004 and at Gjerdrum
Public Library in 2005. Now there are more than 100 studies from the Norwegian libraries. In
Lithuania for the first time this technology was tried out at Mykolas Romeris University Library.
The detailed process of the TTT study in MRU library is available for you here in this chapter.
5.1. About MRU library
For a better view, general information about MRU library will be presented in this section. It
is useful to evaluate the development of the library before doing the research. Important facts as the
number of students, architecture and the floor planning of the library, the provided services and the
library personnel do great influence on the research.
MRU Library link its activities with the University's strategic objectives and performance
measures, the new requirements for the study process and consistent academic mindedness. It is
actively and professionally involved in education and research process, collaborates with the
University community. Library seeks to stay one of the most modern Lithuanian high school
18
libraries, using the modern information technologies and providing high quality services satisfying
the ever-changing needs and goals of the University.9
Mykolas Romeris University is an international university located in the Northern Europe. It
is a recognized university in the global and European higher education sphere. At the end of 2012
MRU was evaluated by the European Commission and awarded the ECTS Label - the highest
international form of recognition of quality activity. MRU continues to remain one of the main
universities of choice in Lithuania. Even though in later years there has been a slight decrease
overall in the number of MRU students, the total number of students indicates that the University
continues to remain one of the most attractive universities in Lithuania. According to official
statistics (the 1st of October, 2012), there were 18,531 students in MRU.10
MRU library has 15 reading rooms in the area of 3 338 m². There are 555 working places,
including 145 computerized working places, in the Central Library Building and 2 campuses.
MRU library readers are students, academic staff and other University employees and other
individuals, who can only use the Library's materials in reading rooms. The Library acquires
materials with regard to the University's priority research and study areas. The Central Building
Library is available 7 days or 141 hours per week and is open during the Night Hours from 8 p.m.
until 5 a.m. The Library offers 15 Reading Rooms where students can work and use all the Library
resources: computer workplaces, electronic resources, scanners, printers and copy machines. All
Library Reading Rooms provide computerized workplaces (145) with internet access, but students
may use their own laptops in all University and Library locations, where free wireless internet
access is offered. Most of the Library electronic resources can be accessed through the local area
network, but the members of MRU academic community have remote access to subscription based
Library resources through EzProxy connection.
The collection of the library amounts to more than 240 688 items (books, periodicals). About
7 840 items are added annually. Besides printed materials MRU library has a lot of electronic
resources:
Databases – 57
E-journals – 29 761 (in databases)
E-books – 241 816 (in databases)
CD’s – more than 600 titles
9 Bibliotekos 2012 m. veiklos ataskaita. http://www.mruni.eu/mru_lt_dokumentai/biblioteka/pdf/MRU_bibliotekos_ataskaita_2012.pdf [accessed on 4/10/2013] 10 Mykolas Romeris university 2012: summary. http://www.mruni.eu/mru_lt_dokumentai/apie_mru/dokumentai/mru_2012_annual_report_summary_final.pdf [accessed on 4/10/2013]
19
Different trainings on the scientific information search and usage of the social technologies
are organized for the acquaint students. The 1st year students are provided with the general
information and are having trainings on the library usage at the beginning of the academic year.
The Library is open for the people with disabilities: access for disabled persons is
substantially improved by introducing lifts and adapted work places. Readers with vision handicaps
can use a powerful electronic magnifier and a software „Magic“. There is also one computerized
working place for people with minor motor disabilities in MRU Library.11 Counting the activities of
people with disabilities could be additional activity of the research.
MRU library delivers a wide range of services for its users:
traditional: borrowing items, online ordering, renewal, reservation of required books,
interlibrary loan, internet, wireless networks, readers consultation at the information desks,
readers ABC, trainings, scanning, printing, copying, etc.
modern and exclusive: open night hours, remote access to subscribed full-text electronic
databases, booking a subject librarian, RSS, bibliometric index analysis and consultation,
reservation of group study rooms and individual workplaces, news on Facebook and Twitter,
consultations on Skype, books check-out machine, etc.
Information to users is provided by phone, e-mail, Ask us platform, Skype, paper booklets,
electronic magazine „Bibliotekos aktualijos“. MRU library users can find all the useful information
on the web page http://www.mruni.eu/lt/universitetas/biblioteka/.
5.2. Statistical data collection in MRU library
Libraries of higher education institutions as well as other libraries of Lithuania are under a
juridical necessity of delivering statistical data to the National Martynas Mažvydas Library of
Lithuania.12
Like the other libraries MRU library use the traditional methods of gathering statistical data:
questionnaires, surveys, visitor counting, acquisition of materials, number of queries per period,
statistical modules of the subscribed databases, interlibrary loan, statistics from the library‘s
electronic catalogue ALEPH software, number of trainings and participants, provided services, etc.
Social technologies are widely used in MRU library and, besides traditional statistics, library
staff analyses users‘ comments in the English and Lithuanian library profiles on Facebook and
Twitter. MRU academic staff can also contact the library personnel on social network LinkedIn.
11 Mykolo Romerio universitetas 2012: veiklos ataskaita. http://www.mruni.eu/mru_lt_dokumentai/apie_mru/dokumentai/2012_mru_rektoriaus_ataskaita.pdf [accessed on 4/10/2013] 12 Statistinės ataskaitos: formos, pateikimo tvarka. http://www.lnb.lt/bibliotekininkui/statistines-ataskaitos-formos-pateikimo-tvarka [accessed 4/10/2013]
20
Two recent surveys were done using online survey system to find out the demands of MRU
academic staff13 and students14.
The TTT method was firstly used in MRU library in Lithuania. It is a new approach for
gathering statistics about users‘ activities in the library. TTT is a cheap and simple method, which
gives a good numerical access of how library users actually use the various parts of the library.
The detailed description of TTT research process in MRU library is in the next chapter.
5.3. Preparation for the observations
The area of MRU Central Building Library and 2 campus libraries is 3338 m². The Central
Building library area is 2300 m². The research was done in the public spaces of the Central Building
Library excluding only Prof. P. Leonas reading-room, which is the other block of the library and is
designed for the academic staff, and rooms for library staff of course.
The observations of users’ activities were done in the area of approximately 1800 m². There
are 10 reading-rooms, a Lending department, 416 seats and 105 stationary computers for users in
the research area.
The period of data on user’s activities gathering was 5 days - the 15th-19th of April, 2013.
Important thing to mention is that it was a period after Easter holiday, so students had been returned
to their studies. There were used the standardized list of 16 activities in MRU library (see Table 2
above).
MRU library is open almost 24/7 - it is open for users 140 hours and 20 minutes per week.
You can see the schedule when the library is open below.
Table 3. MRU library working hours.
MRU library working hours
Day Day hours Night hours
Monday 8:30 - 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Tuesday 8:30 - 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Wednesday 8:30 - 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Thursday 8:30 - 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Friday 8:30 - 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Saturday 9:00 – 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Sunday 9:00 – 20:00 20:15 - 5:00
Total: 140 hours 20 minutes per week
13 Apklausos „MRU mokslininkų poreikių tyrimas“ rezultatai. http://www.manoapklausa.lt/res/47509825079032/ [accessed 4/10/2013] 14 Vartotojų poreikių tyrimo anketa. http://www.manoapklausa.lt/res/47103476922238/ [accessed 4/10/2013]
21
It was decided to count the users‘ traffic and activities at day time on working days (Monday-
Friday) every 2 hours starting 9 a.m. and finishing 7 p.m. Library staff had to do 6 observations
rounds per day, so 30 observations rounds in total. There were done 6485 individual observations
through the period of users‘ activities data gathering. The timetable when observations were done is
given below in the Table 4.
Table 4. Users’ activities observation timetable.
Observation rounds
Day Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
Monday (April 15, 2013) 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00
Tuesday (April 16, 2013) 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00
Wednesday (April 17, 2013) 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00
Thursday (April 18, 2013) 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00
Friday (April 19, 2013) 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00
Total: 30 observation rounds
MRU library like other modern library has electronic gates at the entrance to the library for
the security reasons. This installation also counts library visitors. The number of visitors per day
during the users’ activities observation period is given below in the Table 5.
Table 5. Number of visitors per day during observation period.
Day Number of visitors
Monday (April 15, 2013) 2393
Tuesday (April 16, 2013) 2351
Wednesday (April 17, 2013) 2368
Thursday (April 18, 2013) 2105
Friday (April 19, 2013) 1454
Total: 10671
There were used a standardized list of users activities in MRU library as you can see in Table
6. The detailed description of users’ activities is in chapter 4.
22
Table 6. Users’ activities and letter codes.
Letter codes Activities
ALUP Walks or stands alone.
ALBR Browses alone.
ALSI Sits alone.
ALMD Sits alone reading (or writing).
ALLT Sits alone with laptop.
ALPC Sits alone with stationary computer.
ALSF Individual contact with staff.
GRUP Walks or stands in company.
GRBR Browses in company.
GRSI Sits in a group without media.
GRMD Sits in a group with media.
GRLT Sits in a group with laptop(s).
GRPC Sits in a group with stationary computer(s).
GRSF Group contact with staff.
QUE Queuing.
ETC Other activities.
It is important to remember that:
AL = Alone
GR = Group
UP = Standing UP
SI = Sits
BR = Browses
MD = Media (without data)
LT = Laptop
PC = Stationary PC
SF = Staff
QUE =Queue
ETC = Other
Public area for users was divided into 10 zones. Every zone has its color and a letter code,
which helps to mark zones much easier in the schemes of the library floors. Measuring the area of
each zone was done additionally, which gives a possibility to evaluate, if there is enough space for
users. The counting of seats and stationary computers for users was done also. Comparing the
number of users at the most busy hours with the number of seats and stationary computers will give
answer to the questions:
Is there enough seats for users in the library?
Do we have enough stationary computers for users in the library?
Comparison can be done in two ways:
1. Evaluating and comparing the whole public area of the library, total numbers of seats and
stationary computers for users with the number of visitors at the most busy hour.
23
2. Evaluating and comparing the area of each zone, exact number of seats and stationary
computers for users in each zone with the number of visitors in that zone at the most busy
hour.
Table 7. Library zones, letter codes and zone colors.
Letter codes and
zone color
Zones Zone area (m²) Number of
seats (for users)
Number of
stationary
computers
(for users)
A Information desk
zones 56,9 - -
B Computer zones 272 128 103
C Sitting down zones 274 175
D Periodicals zones 42,5 - -
E Book zones 388,5 - -
F Group rooms zones 76 42 -
G Photocopier and
printer zones 45,7 8 2
H Silent zones 84,3 55 -
I Leisure zones 38,5 8 -
L Hall zones 82 - -
The distribution of people between zones depends on available seats, including access to
library stationary computers. This information is included in the description of zones. To forestall
the events, there are enough seats and stationary computers for users in MRU library.
Every library has its own particularity: architecture, different number of floors, etc. MRU
Central Building library is situated on the Ground floor and on the 2nd floor. The Grand reading-
room is situated on two floors (the Ground floor and the 1st floor). Just to mention for the purpose
of clarity, that all the data from the users’ activities observations in the Grand reading-room was
assigned to the block of the Ground floor (see the section “Collected data processing”).
Floor plans and the division into zones differ greatly from library to library. An architectural
plan of MRU library was available, so the author had to do some amendments – otherwise
researchers need to make their own sketch of all areas open to the public. MRU library plan
covering is given below in pictures 1, 2 and 3.
24
Picture 1. The Ground floor Picture 2. The 1st floor of the Grand reading-room
he 2nd floor
Picture 3. The 2nd floor
25
5.4. Observation of Users’ Activities in MRU Library
For the generalization it must be stated, that all the preparations were done:
a time plan with dates and times for all observation rounds,
a list of activities to be observed,
a library floor plan covering,
a library plan division into functional zones.
The next step is to organize the team for the observations and to give detailed instructions,
how to count users‘ activities. In small libraries with little number of users and area observations
can be done by one person. Here in MRU library observations were done by 17 librarians from the
Department of user services (6485 observations were done in total). Observation rounds were done
every 2 hours starting 9 a.m. and finishing 7 p.m. – 6 rounds per day. Taking into consideration the
public area of the Central building library (approximately 1800 m²), the average number of visitors
per day (2134) and the number of activities (16) it would be very hard to do the counting for one
person. Observations were done in these public spaces of the Central Building Library: the Hall, the
Grand Reading-room, the Longish reading-room, the Mini reading-room, the Lending department, 3
Group study rooms, the Internet reading-room, the Lecturer’s reading-room, 2 Silent reading-rooms
and leisure zones.
Another important thing is to create tables for registering data during the observations (an
example of the table for data registering is in the Appendix 1). 5 tables were created and attributed
to 5 points in the library. The area of MRU Central building library, where the observations were
done, has 5 information points, where library users can get help. It means that a person, who is
responsible for a Reading-room or a Lending department did the counting in the area to which he is
assigned.
There could be some difficulties, for example, when the same zones are in the different places
of the library. It is important to assign one or other activity to a particular zone for the right data
processing.
5.5. Collected data processing
The basic methodology on data processing will be presented in this part of the chapter.
As it was mentioned earlier total number of individual observations is 6485. All the registered
data must be transferred into a spreadsheet. Researcher can use:
26
Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheets. A wide range of functions is offered in this
software and, to authors’ opinion, is more comfortable for entering big amounts of
data. Charts look better here also.
Google tools (Google Docs and Google Drive). Google platform guarantees
implementation of principles of technical openness and availability. Google tools are
free for the registered users. Another advantage of Google tools is easy collaboration
using Google Drive.
other spreadsheets.
The electronic workbook should consist of 5 sheets:
1. Intro. This one is not necessary, but, if you are doing the TTT research for the 1st time, you
should load here the list of activities with letter codes, the library floors with abbreviations
and the list of zones with the letter codes and assigned colors. This will help to quickly
recall the meaning of the letter codes used in other sheets.
2. OBS. Collected data on users’ activities must be transferred into the sheet of Observations.
It shows the number of activities from each observation round in different zones. A
summation of the data from the observation rounds using formulas must be done in the end
of the sheet. This sheet is a database for the data interpretation in the other sheets. A number
of lines in this sheet depends on the number of the observation rounds and users’ activities.
There are 592 lines in the case of MRU research. An example of the collected data from one
observation round is in the Appendix 2.
3. Week. There are 2 tables in this sheet. The 1st table provides information, how many
activities were counted on each day of the week in each zone. The 2nd table shows total
number of activities on each floor on every day of the week. The data is taken from the
Observations sheet using formulas. The examples of those tables are in the Appendix 3.
4. Day. There are 2 tables in this sheet. The 1st table provides information, how many activities
were counted on the exact observation hour in each zone that let us know on whose hours
library is mostly occupied. 2nd table shows total number of activities on each floor on the
exact observation hour that let us know whose floors of the library are more popular. The
data is taken from the Observations sheet using formulas. The examples of those tables are
in the Appendix 4.
5. Act. The table in the sheet of Activities provides information how many activities at all were
registered in each zone. The data is taken from the Observations sheet using formulas. An
example of this table is in the Appendix 5.
27
So the most important thing is to type gathered data on users’ activities to the 2nd sheet
(Observations sheet) and to do the right and accurate formulas for the automatic data transferring
into other sheets.
5.6. Findings of the Research
The main findings of TTT research in MRU library and some charts illustrating the processed
data are given below.
General findings of the research are:
- the actual use of computers was higher than expected - library users are mostly using laptops
and stationary computers,
- the frequency of activities carried out in groups was higher than expected; most of the
students do their research individually, but also prefer working in groups of 2 people and
more,
- contacting with staff was higher than expected - consultations with the library staff are
popular among the library users,
- purely social activities (not involving computers or media) were less than expected.
The main indicators are available in the diagrams below.
Diagram 1. Users’ Activities in MRU library.
244210
109566
20081075
564193
119131203
36020716470
262
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Walks or stands alone
Browses alone
Sits alone
Sits alone reading (or writing)
Sits alone with laptop
Sits alone with stationary computer
Contact with staff alone
Walks or stands in company
Browses in company
Sits in a group without media
Sits in a group with media
Sits in a group with laptop(s)
Sits in a group with stationary computer(s)
Group contact with staff
Queuing
Other activities
Number of Observations
Use
rs' A
ctiv
itie
s
Users' Activities in MRU Library (April, 2013)
28
Diagram 1 shows the number of each activity during the period of observations. The leading
fields belong to activities “Sits alone with laptop” (2008 observations) and “Sits alone with
stationary computer” (1075 observations). The percentage look of the leading activities is in the
Diagrams 2 and 3.
Diagram 2. Tradition vs. Modernity.
Seven blocks (individual + group) of activities are reflected in Diagram 2: Sitting with media
(books, papers, etc., but not the computers), Sitting without media (doing nothing), Using stationary
computers, Standing or walking, Using laptops, Browsing and Contacting with the library staff. 42
% (almost half) of the library users are using laptops. 23 % of the library visitors use stationary
computers.
Diagram 3. Computers vs. paper.
2%
12%
23%
5%42%
4% 12%
Tradition vs. Modernity (April, 2013)
Sitting w/media
Sitting w/o media
Using PC
Stand/walk
Using LT
Browsing
Contact
83%
17%
Computers vs. Paper (April, 2013)
Computers
Paper
29
Diagram 3 reflects usage of the computers (stationary and laptops) and paper media (books,
periodicals or other writings. 83 % of the library users prefer computerized work. It is important to
mention, that, if a person use computer and printed media at one time, the activity is attributed to
the group of using computers. Only 17 % of the library users work with paper media.
Digital technologies make the impact of change on both teaching and independent studying.
The role of technologies is growing coherently in the all fields of social life including the higher
education. Usage of them leads to the shortness of processes, the growth of efficiency, the
simplification of management and the reduction of expenditure.
Diagram 4. Individual work vs. Group work.
A percentage expression of Individual and Group work is reflected in the Diagram 4. The same
seven activities as in the Diagram 2 were taken and divided into two sections: Individual work and
Group work. The split between Individual and Group work is obvious only in the activity “Using
laptop”. So the general finding from this dataset is that library visitors are used to do the collective
work.
In conclusion it must be said, that TTT method revealed very useful information how to use
library spaces more efficiently and can be used as a tool for the library space planning. It is
interesting and librarians need to know, what is happening in the field of higher education and
especially in their libraries. Besides general findings that are at the beginning of this section, it was
noticed, that students are in a big need of private individual and group study rooms.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Sittingw/media
Sitting w/omedia
Using PC Stand/walk Using LT Browsing Contact
2%
12%
23%
5%
42%
4%
12%10%
15% 15% 14%
26%
9%12%
Individual vs. Group (April, 2013)
Alone Group
30
Conclusions
TTT is a cheap and simple method to gather data about users‘ activities in the library. It gives
a good numerical access of what they are doing in the library and how library users actually use the
various parts of the library. TTT reveals both the quality - or the kinds of activity – and the quantity
of use.
Librarians have little systematic information on users‘ activities inside their libraries and are
not familiar with the structural and systematic research on the performance of their libraries. TTT is
an alternative to traditional methods of gathering the statistical information and gives the additional
value revealing users’ behavior inside the library through their activities in the library zones. It is a
new approach for gathering library statistics. By using this method MRU library seeks to improve
its activities. TTT can be used as a tool for the library space planning.
Using TTT method in MRU library revealed useful information, what users are doing inside
the library. Most of the library users are working with mobile devices: laptops, iPads and other.
Stationary computers are popular in MRU library also. The habits of working with printed materials
are transforming from making notes in written form to using the mobile devices, whose number is
growing inevitably. It was noticed that the library users are used to do collective work and are in
need of consultations by the library staff.
TTT was firstly used in MRU library in Lithuania and could be a good practice for other
Lithuanian libraries to gather statistics on their users’ activities inside the library. Looking ahead a
comparative study on TTT researches in Lithuanian libraries could be done. To ensure the
possibility of the longitudinal analysis MRU library is looking ahead to do the same research in
2014.
31
References
1. Apklausos „MRU mokslininkų poreikių tyrimas“ rezultatai.
http://www.manoapklausa.lt/res/47509825079032/ [accessed 4/10/2013]
2. Arango A. M., Escobar C. and Molnár A. 2009. Students in action: An observation study of the
Oslo University College Learning Centre.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tEnRk9i5stiUnQ5OdYIB9N5I5MHPQMrVYdZTXND-
7V0/preview?pli=1 [accessed 4/10/2013]
3. Bibliotekos 2012 m. veiklos ataskaita.
http://www.mruni.eu/mru_lt_dokumentai/biblioteka/pdf/MRU_bibliotekos_ataskaita_2012.pdf
[accessed on 4/10/2013]
4. Hoivik T. 2008. Count the Traffic. World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General
Conference and Council. http://mogadorebranch.akronlibrary.org/wp-
content/blogs.dir/19/files/2011/07/Count-the-traffic.pdf [accessed 4/10/2013]
5. Høivik T. 2012. Students at work: Traffic observation in academic libraries. Paper for the
SCECSAL Conference, Nairobi, June 4-8. https://docs.google.com/document/d/12s2wiXkTn-
Pn0IxnYoPSTAPPlqBcFXwp3dAYVR1LXhs/edit?pli=1#heading=h.zfw9llaostwx [accessed
4/10/2013]
6. Hoivik T. Track The Traffic. A new approach to user behavior.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qJI4v4JqT9yffo_b22IjfnLAbRzmuIKO9EZXVeJGt9Q/ed
it?usp=sharing [accessed 4/10/2013]
7. LATINA POST-IT 2013. http://akkordio.net/postit/ [accessed on 4/10/2013]
8. Mykolas Romeris university 2012: summary.
http://www.mruni.eu/mru_lt_dokumentai/apie_mru/dokumentai/mru_2012_annual_report_sum
mary_final.pdf [accessed on 4/10/2013]
9. Mykolas Romeris university. http://www.mruni.eu [accessed on 4/10/2013]
10. Mykolo Romerio universitetas 2012: veiklos ataskaita.
http://www.mruni.eu/mru_lt_dokumentai/apie_mru/dokumentai/2012_mru_rektoriaus_ataskaita.
pdf [accessed on 4/10/2013]
11. Practical statistics. https://sites.google.com/site/practicalstatistics/topics/ttt-method [accessed
16/07/2013]
12. Statistinės ataskaitos: formos, pateikimo tvarka. http://www.lnb.lt/bibliotekininkui/statistines-
ataskaitos-formos-pateikimo-tvarka [accessed 4/10/2013]
13. Vartotojų poreikių tyrimo anketa. http://www.manoapklausa.lt/res/47103476922238/ [accessed
4/10/2013]
32
Appendix 1. Users’ activities data registering table.
No. Activity Day
h number h number h number h number h number h number Total
1 ALUP
09:0
0
11:0
0
13:0
0
15:0
0
17:0
0
19:0
0
2 ALBR
3 ALSI
4 ALMD
5 ALLT
6 ALPC
7 ALSF
8 GRUP
9 GRBR
10 GRSI
11 GRMD
12 GRLT
13 GRPC
14 GRSF
15 QUE
16 ETC
Total 9:00-19:00
33
Appendix 2. Observations sheet.
Floor
Ground
and 2nd
Ground
and 2nd
Ground
and 2nd Ground
Ground
and 2nd Ground
Ground
and 2nd 2nd
Ground
and 2nd Ground
Zones A B C D E F G H I L
Date Weekday Time Activity SUM
15,04 Mon 9:00 ALUP
15,04 Mon 900 ALBR
15,04 Mon 900 ALSI
15,04 Mon 900 ALMD
15,04 Mon 900 ALLT
15,04 Mon 900 ALPC
15,04 Mon 900 ALSF
15,04 Mon 900 GRUP
15,04 Mon 900 GRBR
15,04 Mon 900 GRSI
15,04 Mon 900 GRMD
15,04 Mon 900 GRLT
15,04 Mon 900 GRPC
15,04 Mon 900 GRSF
15,04 Mon 900 QUE
15,04 Mon 900 ETC
It is an example for data entering from one observation round.
34
Appendix 3. Week sheet.
G – the Ground floor
2nd – the Second floor
1st table provides information, how many activities were counted on each day of the week in each zone.
2nd table shows total number of activities on each floor on every day of the week.
Floor G and 2nd
G and 2nd
G and 2nd G
G and 2nd G
G and 2nd 2nd
G and 2nd G
Zone A B C D E F G H I L SUM
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Ground floor and 2nd floor
Ground floor 2nd floor Total
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
35
Appendix 4. Day sheet.
Floor G and 2nd
G and 2nd
G and 2nd G
G and 2nd G
G and 2nd 2nd
G and 2nd G
Zone A B C D E F G H I L SUM
9:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
SUM
Time Total Ground floor and 2nd floor Ground floor 2nd floor
9:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
SUM
G – the Ground floor
2nd – the Second floor
1st table provides information, how many activities were counted on the exact observation hour in each zone.
2nd table shows total number of activities on each floor on the exact observation hour.
36
Appendix 5. Activities sheet.
Floor G and 2nd
G and 2nd
G and 2nd G
G and 2nd G
G and 2nd 2nd
G and 2nd G
Zone A B C D E F G H I L SUM
ALUP
ALBR
ALSI
ALMD
ALLT
ALPC
ALSF
GRUP
GRBR
GRSI
GRMD
GRLT
GRPC
GRSF
QUE
ETC
SUM