tues nnmc pi project vision screening

8
Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING Marcia Frye Candice Snyder Katie Charnock Michael Cunningham Bridget Cunningham

Upload: gil-brady

Post on 30-Dec-2015

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING. Marcia Frye Candice Snyder Katie Charnock Michael Cunningham Bridget Cunningham. AAP Policy Statement. Anatomy and gross visual assessments should be checked from birth to 3 years of age, about the age when visual acuity can be measured reliably. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Tues NNMC PI ProjectVISION SCREENING

Marcia FryeCandice SnyderKatie Charnock

Michael CunninghamBridget Cunningham

Page 2: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

AAP Policy Statement

• Anatomy and gross visual assessments should be checked from birth to 3 years of age, about the age when visual acuity can be measured reliably.

• Visual acuity testing is recommended for all children starting at 3 years of age with every well visit

• Vision should be assessed whenever there is a complaint about vision

Page 3: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Problem

• Perceived low number of documented visual acuity on AHLTA chart

• Chart review of 250 well visits ages 4yrs and greater

• Intervention• Repeat chart review

Page 4: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Data

Dates: 01 Jul – 04 Aug• 4yo 3/28 11%• 5yo 28/42 67%• 6yo 16/24 67%• 7yo 7/17 41%• 8yo 13/24 54%• 9yo 7/17 41%• 10yo 4/10 40%• 11yo 12/25 48%• 12yo 5/17 29%• 13yo 7/12 58%• 14yo 5/14 36%• 15yo 2/6 33%• 16yo 3/4 75%• 17yo 2/8 25%• 18yo 0/1 0%• 19yo 2/2 100%

• Total: 117/252 46%• Excluding 4yo 114/224 51%• Abnormal: 26/117 22%

– (12 of 26 referred)

Page 5: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Intervention

• Questionnaire to all corpsmen working in clinic identifying obstacles

• Education to all corpsmen regarding importance of test/documentation and guidelines from AAP

• Increased number of charts in clinic by 300% (4 charts-Snellen and picture)

Page 6: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Repeat Data

Dates 16 Feb – 12 Apr• 3yo 0/2 0%• 4yo 0/35 0%• 5yo 17/49 35%• 6yo 13/35 37%• 7yo 12/26 46%• 8yo 12/21 57%• 9yo 10/17 59%• 10yo 8/17 47%• 11yo 9/19 47%• 12yo 9/15 60%• 13yo 3/10 30%• 14yo 3/7 43%• 15yo 5/7 71%• 16yo 3/4 75%• 17yo 2/4 50%• 18yo 2/2 100%• 21yo 2/2 100%

• Total: 110/272 40%• Excluding 3-4y/o 110/235 47%• Abnormal: 10/110 9%

– (4 of 10 referred)

Page 7: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Hypothetical Problems/Reasons for Decline

• Not performed due to optometry visit in the last year (w/o documentation of the appointment)

• Vision screened but not recorded (b/c corpsman brings pt to room w/ vitals sheet)

• Failure of physicians to recognize screen not performed or documented

• Patients late to appointment and rushed to room• Not recognizing 3 and 4 year olds should be

screened (despite training)

Page 8: Tues NNMC PI Project VISION SCREENING

Future

• Improve documentation• Incentive program with HMs• Personal responsibility