twas newsletter vol. 10 no. 2 (apr-jun 1998) · twas n e w slette r published with the support of...
TRANSCRIPT
TW
AS
Ne w
sletter
PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT
OF THE KUWAIT FOUNDATION
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT
OF SCIENCES
Vol. 10 - No. 2 Apr - Jun 1998
10
1 9 9 8
T h e
Ne
ws
letterof
th
eT
hi
rd
W o r l d A c a d e m
yo
fS
ci
en
ce
s
TWAS NEWSLETTER
PUBLISHED QUARTERLY WITH
THE SUPPORT OF THE KUWAIT
FOUNDATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCES (KFAS)
BY THE THIRD WORLD
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (TWAS)
C/O THE ABDUS SALAM
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE
FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS
PO BOX 586
34100 TRIESTE, ITALY
PH: +39 (040) 2240327
FAX: +39 (040) 224559
TELEX: 460392 ICTP I
E-MAIL: [email protected]
HTTP://WWW.ICTP.TRIESTE.IT/
~TWAS/TWAS.HTML
EDITOR
DANIEL SCHAFFER
ASSISTANT EDITOR/SET UP
GISELA ISTEN
TWAS SUPPORT STAFF
HELEN GRANT, HELEN MARTIN,
LEENA MUNGAPEN, SANDRA RAVALICO
DESIGN & ART DIRECTION
SANDRA ZORZETTI, RADO JAGODIC
(LINK, TRIESTE)
PRINTING AND BOUNDING
GRAPHART SNC
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,
THE TEXT OF THIS NEWSLETTER
IS WRITTEN BY ITS EDITOR AND MAY
BE REPRODUCED FREELY WITH DUE
CREDIT TO THE SOURCE
ED
ITO
R’S
NO
TEOn 10 November 1983, the founding members of the Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS)
met for the first time in Trieste, Italy. As a result of that historic meeting, the organization’s
founders, 42 distinguished scientists from the developing world (including all of the South’s Nobel
Laureates at the time), cited four issues where they believed the new Academy could make a differ-
ence: encouraging the pursuit of scientific excellence in the developing world, addressing the needs
of young scientists, facilitating South-South and South-North scientific cooperation, and establish-
ing strong links with national and regional academies.
On 9 December 1998, the Academy will hold its tenth General Meeting, also in Trieste. Since our
initial gathering, the issues first outlined by our
founders have continued to guide our activities.
On the eve of our next General Meeting, I thought
it would be helpful to highlight our past accomplishments and offer a glimpse of the future.
TWAS’s second General Meeting, held in Trieste in July 1985, was a historic event. Not only did
the occasion mark the first TWAS General Conference, but equally important UN Secretary General
Javier Pérez de Cuellar was the guest of honour at the Academy’s official inauguration. Thanks to a
generous grant of US$1.5 million from the Italian government, TWAS members discussed and insti-
tuted a set of programmes for awards, grants and fellowships designed to address the four issues
agreed upon at the first meeting. In effect, the 1983 meeting outlined the lofty goals of the
Academy, and the 1985 meeting provided the means for reaching them.
Since then, the Academy has met at least once every two years to review and approve activities,
initiate and discuss new strategies, and elect a new council. In addition to Trieste, meetings have
taken place in China, Venezuela, Kuwait, Nigeria and Brazil.
The third General Meeting, held in Beijing, China in 1987, was our first meeting to take place in
a developing country. Three important initiatives were discussed and approved: to organize a gen-
Then and Now
CONTENTS 2THEN AND NOW 4CITIES AND SHAKES 6S&T IN THE ISLAMIC
WORLD 8SOUTHERN CYBERSPACE 11MAKING EVERY VISIT COUNT 15ROAD TO
INNOVATION 18PEOPLE, PLACES, EVENTS
[continued next page]
ED
ITO
R’S
NO
TE
eral conference every two years in a developing country, build a network linking national science
academies and research councils in the South, and establish a programme to promote women sci-
entists in the third world. The last two proposals led to the creation of the Third World Network of
Scientific Organizations (TWNSO) in 1988 and Third World Organization of Women in Science
(TWOWS) in 1989.
The sixth General Meeting, held in Trieste in 1993, coincided with the tenth anniversary of the
Academy’s birth. The occasion provided an opportunity to reflect on our accomplishments and devise
a strategy for our continued success. Members discussed and approved the Academy’s first strategic
plan and officially launched a campaign to create a US$10 million endowment fund to cover the
Academy’s operational costs.
The eighth General Meeting, held in Trieste in 1996, was a sad event. Just days before
Academy members gathered, Abdus Salam, the guiding force behind the creation of TWAS and pres-
ident from our founding until 1994, passed away. Participants immediately agreed to hold the
meeting in Salam’s honour and to pay special tribute to his visionary and energetic leadership.
As TWAS members meet for their tenth General Meeting in Trieste this December, three impor-
tant tasks will be high on the agenda: electing a new council for the next two years, discussing and
approving strategies to implement the recommendations of the second strategic plan (approved at
the Academy’s ninth General Meeting in Rio de Janeiro last year) and re-invigorating the Academy’s
fund-raising efforts, especially for the endowment fund. We also hope our membership will be greet-
ed by good news: an announcement that the Italian government and the United Nations Educational
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Academy’s administrative body, have concluded
an agreement providing a permanent legal basis for the Italian government’s financial contribution
to TWAS. Such an announcement will ensure that the Academy continues to advance the agenda that
its founding members first articulated 15 years ago.
No one at that first meeting could have anticipated the Academy’s future impact on science in
the developing world. And no one can now predict TWAS’s impact in the future. However, with the
strength of our membership and the security provided by a stable financial base, we can be confi-
dent that the Academy will continue to make a difference for thousands of scientists in the devel-
oping world.
> Mohamed H.A. Hassan
TWAS Executive Director
3
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
CO
MM
EN
TA
RY
S hocking headlines over the past several decades tell the story. In 1985, a major earth-
quake in Mexico City kills 9,500 people; in 1988, a thunderous quake in Spitak,
Armenia, causes 25,000 deaths; and in 1990, powerful tremors in Luzon, Philippines leave
2,000 dead. The fact is that earthquakes often create life-and-death situations for hun-
dreds of millions of people living in some of the world’s most densely populated urban cen-
tres. Worldwide, more than 20,000 people on average are killed by earthquakes each year.
This December, the TWAS tenth General Meeting will hold an international symposium
that examines the seismic risks faced by megacities. In the following essay, Giuliano
Panza, professor of seismology at the University of Trieste in Italy, who is organizing the
symposium, talks about the risks posed by earthquakes, especially in megacities in devel-
oping countries. The symposium will include talks by more than 15 earthquake experts—
seismologists, engineers, planners and emergency managers. TWAS plans to publish these
presentations in an edited collection.
Earthquakes are old as the earth itself. Yet, despite unprecedented advances in sci-
ence and technology, we have become increasingly vulnerable to the earth’s tremors.
From Los Angeles, California, to Papua New Guinea, earthquakes have taken a terrible
toll over the past decade.
What accounts for our vulnerability? The irregularity and long intervals between
earthquakes dull public awareness and undermine governments’ willingness to invest in
earthquake mitigation mea-
sures. Similarly, effective
strategies require more than
a commitment to science and
technology. Indeed they necessitate difficult administrative and management measures,
which often test the political will of public institutions, especially those in the devel-
oping world where people are most at risk.
Yet, the most important factor behind our increasing vulnerability to earthquakes
lies in the rapid rise in population, particularly in the developing world’s megacities,
where flimsy building construction and woefully inadequate public utilities place resi-
dents at great risk. Today, more than one-third of the world’s population—some 2 bil-
lion people—live in earthquake-prone areas, largely sprawling urban conglomerations
such as Mexico City (16 million people), Beijing (12 million people) and Karachi (10
million people)—all of which have experienced devastating earthquakes in the past few
decades.
During this century, fourth-fifths of all deaths caused by earthquakes have taken
place in developing countries. Based on recent statistics, we can expect about 9,000
people worldwide to die from earthquakes next year. Approximately 8,000 will reside in
developing countries.
In 1950, only half of the world’s urban earthquake-threatened population lived in
developing countries. By 2000, the proportion will climb to 85 percent. By 2025, about
CITIES AND SHAKES
4
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
5 billion people—roughly two-thirds of the world’s population—will live in cities. Such
unprecedented growth will strain urban infrastructures—buildings, roads, bridges,
water facilities, sewage systems and electric-power networks. Cities, particularly megac-
ities in the South, are becoming more densely populated and more fragile. No other nat-
ural disaster exposes this vulnerability in more dramatic and tragic fashion than an
earthquake.
As with many other natural disasters, earthquakes have both immediate and long-
term effects. You don’t need to be a seismologist to realize that when thousands of peo-
ple die and property damage runs into billions of dollars, communities do not quickly
recover. Experts estimate, for example, that potential disruptions caused by a major
earthquake near Ecuador’s capital city of Guayaquil could cut the nation’s annual gross
domestic product (GDP) by half. Indeed the 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan, pared 1
percent from Japan’s GDP—the world’s second largest economy—despite the govern-
ment’s rapid response.
How can scientists help counteract these adverse impacts? An earthquake’s tragic
effects can only be lessened through comprehensive assessments of seismic hazards
whose ultimate goal should be to raise public awareness about potential risks. Such
awareness might lead to policy measures that improve building designs and construc-
tion making them more resistant to seismic jolts. At the same time, such assessments
might help both citizens and public officials more fully appreciate the grave risks asso-
ciated with current population and land-use trends, especially those taking place among
the developing world’s megacities. During this century, average earthquake-related mor-
tality rates in developed nations have fallen by a factor of 10. The factor in developing
countries has remained constant.
In 1996, the United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs launched the Risk
Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas Against Seismic Disasters project. Based on informa-
tion gathered from recent earthquakes, its aim has been to develop practical tools for
assessing seismic risks in large cities. In 1997, the United Nations Educational Scientific
and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) funded the Realistic Modelling of Seismic Input for
Megacities and Large Urban Areas project. Its goal is to evaluate seismic hazards in some
20 urban areas, mostly in developing countries. As part of a larger UNESCO multidisci-
plinary programme, the Earthquake and Megacities Initiative, it marks a critical first step
in devising effective earthquake mitigation policies for megacities worldwide.
Such strategies require earth scientists, seismic engineers, sociologists, planners
and emergency-response experts to share information. That’s what the TWAS symposium
will seek to accomplish through broad-ranging discussions of the scientific, technolog-
ical, administrative and management measures that must be considered if we hope to
curb the tragic impacts of one of nature’s most devastating displays of power.
Megacities and earthquakes are a dangerous brew. Now that we have mixed one with
the other, perhaps scientists can help us reduce the risks associated with putting so
many people atop of some of the world’s “shakiest” areas.
> Giuliano Panza
University of Trieste
Trieste, Italy
5
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
S&T IN THEISLAMIC WORLD
6
The Ministerial Standing Committee for Scientific Cooperation (COMSTECH) has become one of the leading voices for science and technology in the Muslim world.
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
ABDUS SALAM, THE NOBEL LAUREATE WHO SPEARHEADED THE
DR IVE FOR THE CREAT ION OF THIRD WORLD ACADEMY OF
SC I ENCES (TWAS) AND SERVED AS THE ACADEMY ’ S PRES IDENT
DURING THE F IRS T DECADE OF I T S EX I S T ENCE, WAS QUICK TO
NOTE THAT THE ISLAMIC WORLD ENJOYED A R ICH SC I ENT I F I C
LEGACY.
In fact, he often cited the Quran to illustrate the deep-seated
respect for science that was part of Islamic tradition. “Some 750
verses of the Holy Quran (almost one eighth of the book),” he
noted, “exhort believers to study Nature, to reflect, to make the
best use of reason in their search for the ultimate and to make the
acquiring of knowledge and sciences obligatory upon every
Muslim....”
At the same time, Salam often acknowledged that the central
role that science had played among Islamic countries came to an
abrupt halt in the 11th century and has never been the same. Late
in his life, Salam lamented that among “the major civilizations on
this planet, science is the weakest in the Islamic Commonwealth.”
In January 1981, the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC)
established a Ministerial Standing Committee for Scientific
Cooperation (COMSTECH) at its third annual meeting held in
Makkah-tul-Mukarrama, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Committee
was created to promote the scientific and technological capabilities
of Muslim countries through closer “cooperation and mutual assis-
tance.” OIC’s 55 member states, ranging from Afghanistan to
Lebanon to Uganda, are home to more than one billion people—a
fifth of the world’s population.
Through the years, COMSTECH has concentrated on several
broad objectives:
• To pursue collaborative research on issues of common concern
within the OIC region—for example, desertification and agricultur-
al productivity.
• To create effective institutional networks for planning, research-
ing and developing basic science and high technology, including
state-of-the-art information technologies.
• To establish benchmarks for assessing the scientific and techno-
logical capabilities and progress of OIC member states.
7
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8ties of mutual concern in the years ahead. These activities will
include a:
• Research and training fellowships programme offering train-
ing to some 100 scientists each year who are given opportunities
to work in centres of excellence across the Muslim world.
Institutions currently participating in this programme include the
Centre for Agriculture Economic Studies in Cairo; Ferdousi
University of Mashad in Mashad, Iran; and the Pasteur Institute of
Morocco in Casablanca, Morocco.
• Spare parts programme supplying funds—usually less than
US$500—for the replacement of worn-out or malfunctioning equip-
ment parts. The programme is designed to allow scientists to con-
centrate on what they do best—research—and not be diverted by
equipment problems that sap their energy and attention.
• Visiting scientists programme encouraging the exchange of
scientists among OIC members states, especially those who share
common research interests. The programme focuses on both mature
scientists with a proven track record of accomplishments and
young, promising scientists seeking postdoc-
torate experience.
The Committee’s strategy is based on the
belief that advances in science and technolo-
gy hold the key to overcoming the difficult
challenges the Muslim world faces today—
problems arising from “economic exploitation,
cultural subversion and the slow rate of
growth.”
“Islamic solidarity...in scientific research and technological
development” is essential for “the common good and progress” of
the Muslim world, note COMSTECH officials. Cooperative initiatives
such as those launched by the Committee provide the most impor-
tant vehicles for enabling the Muslim world to “recover from its
slumber and regain its lost glory in science and technology, which
was its privilege for many centuries.” ■
For additional information about COMSTECH, please contact:
> COMSTECH Secretariat, 3-Constitution Avenue, G- 5/2,
Islamabad - 44000, Pakistan, phone (+92 51) 9220681 - 3;
fax (+92 51) 9211115; e-mail [email protected].
The ultimate goal of COMSTECH has remained simple to articu-
late yet difficult to achieve: to build the “indigenous capability of
member states in the fields of science and technology through
cooperation and mutual assistance.”
Since its inception, COMSTECH has concentrated on a wide
range of topical areas, which the Committee believes are either
central to the future well-being of OIC member states or at the cut-
ting edge of scientific inquiry worldwide. These areas include
biotechnology, agricultural productivity and microelectronics. For
example, it has organized seminars and work-
shops in biological conservation in Brunei
Darussalam, laser applications in Kuwait, agro-
climatology in Pakistan, and waste manage-
ment in Jordan.
“Despite its limited resources, COMSTECH
has done much to advance the cause of sci-
ence and technology throughout the Muslim
world,” says TWAS fellow Atta-ur-Rahman,
COMSTECH’s Coordinator General. “However, its impact could be
that much greater if it could secure additional funding.”
For this reason, COMSTECH’s executive committee has launched
a “collaborative and cooperative projects” programme designed to
encourage the Committee and OIC member states to seek funding
from international donors for future projects.
Over the long term, COMSTECH will try to secure external funds
for the creation of new inter-Islamic research networks as well as
an Islamic university on science and technology. For now, the
Islamic Development Bank has agreed to support a COMSTECH train-
ing initiative with a grant totalling more than US$2 million. Other
funding agencies include the International Foundation for Science
(IFS), which has joined COMSTECH in sponsoring a project to aid
young Muslim researchers, and the government of Pakistan, which
recently provided COMSTECH with US$1 million for the promotion of
scientific and technological cooperation in the Muslim world.
COMSTECH has also signed a Memorandum of Cooperation with
TWAS that will enable both organizations to jointly pursue activi-
“COMSTECH has donemuch to advance thecause of science and
technology throughoutthe Muslim world.”
SOUTHERNCYBERSPACE
8
The information revolution promises to accelerate advances in science. But some observers fear it will leave researchers in the developing world even farther behind.
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
HISTORY SHOWS THAT ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY OFTEN ENHANCE
E X I S T I N G I N E Q UA L I T I E S . A R E C E N T S T U DY BY T H E U .S .
NAT IONAL TELECOMMUNICAT IONS AND INFORMAT ION ADMINI-
S TRAT ION, FOR EXAMPLE , REVEALED THAT WHILE ACCESS TO COM-
P U T E R S , M O D E M S A N D O N L I N E C O N N E C T I V I T Y I N C R E A S E D
throughout the United States between 1994 and 1997, the gap
between the rich (mainly white and non-Hispanic immigrants) and
the disadvantaged (mainly black, Hispanic and inner city popula-
tions) had widened considerably.
Let us consider scientific research in India. Researchers must
find out what is happening around the world as well as keep oth-
ers informed about what they are doing. Information is the key to
knowledge and dissemination of information crucial for the scien-
tific enterprise.
In pre-independent India, when such world-class scientists as
C.V. Raman, Meghnad Saha and J.C. Bose made their critical con-
tributions to knowledge, professional journals served as the main
vehicle for scholarly communication. Scientists worldwide had vir-
tually the same level of access to information, although those
working in developing countries received their journals a few
months later than their European colleagues.
Despite the tremendous proliferation of journals today, many of
them remain beyond the reach of libraries and research institutes in
the South, especially journals published by commercial firms. The
best academic science library in India, at the Indian Institute of
Science, receives some 1,560 serials, including those that arrive free
of charge or through an exchange. In the United States and Europe,
many university libraries subscribe to some 50,000 journal titles.
To make matters worse, due to the rising value of the U.S. dol-
lar on international currency markets and dramatic increases in sub-
scription prices, libraries in India and other developing nations have
been forced to reduce the number of journals and data bases they
receive. The situation in Africa is particularly bad. “When you call
some of us scientists,” an African professor recently told a journal-
ist, “we laugh at ourselves. We know we can no longer make contri-
butions to science. I do not know what my colleagues in Kenya or
London have found, for example. So I cannot carry out an experi-
ment and believe I am on the path to an original contribution....If
I have been giving generations of students the same notes for the
last 10 years, I should not call myself a scientist.”
Now, many primary journals and data base collections have gone
electronic. Title-listing services such as Current Contents Connect,
abstracting services such as SciFinder and multidisciplinary citation
indexes such as Web of Science are available on the web—at a fee
that most university and research laboratory libraries in developing
9
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8unable to surf the net or do online searches. Dated technology
restricts them to sending and receiving e-mail messages.
Those connected to new information technologies undoubtedly
are much better off than before. But a vast majority of scientists in
developing countries do not have access.
Take, for instance, the e-Print archive. This information service
is available to physicists at only a few institutes in India—for
example, the Indian Institute of Science, Institute of Mathematical
Sciences and Tata Institute of Fundamental Research. More dis-
turbingly, Indian physicists in such leading universities as the
University of Delhi, Banaras Hindu University and University of
Madras are not connected to the internet or e-mail at all. In con-
trast, every physicist in the United States and the United Kingdom
enjoys easy access to e-mail and the internet.
The disadvantages that this disparity poses for scientists in
developing countries are obvious. A growing number of journals,
especially in the fields of science and technology, now receive and
review manuscripts via e-mail and some journals are available only
in electronic form. Editors of such journals likely will be reluctant
to use referees from developing countries, even if they are excep-
tionally competent in their fields because it would be difficult to
reach them electronically. Besides, many scientists in developing
countries will be unable to publish their work in electronic journals.
The United Nations has voiced its concerns about the imbalance
in access to electronic communication facilities. The UN’s
Administrative Committee on Coordination, issued a statement on
Universal Access to Basic Communication and Information Services
in April 1997 in which it stated: “We are profoundly concerned at
the deepening maldistribution of access, resources and opportuni-
ties in the information and communication field. The information
technology gap and related inequities between industrialized and
developing nations are widening: a new type of poverty—informa-
tion poverty—looms. Most developing countries, especially the
least developed countries (LDCs) are not sharing in the communi-
cation revolution, since they lack:
• Affordable access to core information resources, cutting-edge
technology and sophisticated telecommunication systems and
infrastructure.
• The capacity to build, operate, manage, and service the tech-
nologies involved.
• Policies that promote equitable public participation in the infor-
mation society as both producers and consumers of information and
knowledge.
• A workforce trained to develop, maintain and provide the value-
added products and services required by the information economy.”
countries cannot afford. Many frontline journals have become
increasingly accessible via password controls on the web through,
for example, Elsevier’s Science Direct.
Physicists have gone a step further. They circulate preprints
electronically, via Los Alamos National Laboratory’s e-Print archive,
long before a hardcopy is printed in refereed journals. This service
is offered free of charge to physicists worldwide. In theory, anyone
anywhere in the world can use this service. In reality, though, one
must have access to the appropriate technology, which most scien-
tists in developing countries do not have. As a result, the perfor-
mance of researchers can be adversely affected not because of their
work but because they are not connected to electronic information
networks.
Accessing information through CD-ROMs offers capabilities not
possible through print, and accessing through the web offers capa-
bilities not possible through CD-ROMs. As a recent editorial in
Science noted, “Digital publishing has much to recommend it over
print publishing....Uncomfortable trade-offs are involved...but the
gains include ease of access, rapid delivery over great distances,
and hypertext links from indexing services and bibliographic cita-
tions to the full text of cited documents.”
Hardly any laboratory in the developing world has web access
to these databases. How can scientists working in these laborato-
ries be equal partners in the worldwide enterprise of knowledge
production? The truth is that the transition from hard copies to
electronic publishing likely will widen the gap between developed
countries and developing countries and further marginalize already
marginalized scientists and scholars in the South.
Most developing countries do not have the necessary infra-
structure (computer terminals, networks, communication channels
and bandwidths) to become equal partners in worldwide knowledge
production and dissemination. According to Bruce Girard, former
director of Latin America’s community radio Pulsar, 95 percent of
all computers are located in developed nations, and 10 developed
nations, accounting for 20 percent of the world’s population, have
75 percent of the world’s telephone lines. Teledensity in India
today is slightly less than 2 lines per 100 persons. This marks a vast
improvement. Less than five years ago, teledensity in India was 1
line per 100 persons. In contrast, however, teledensity in the
United States and Canada is more than 60 per 100 inhabitants. To
make matters worse, most of India’s telephones are concentrated in
the largest metropolitan areas.
Many Indian universities, moreover, do not have e-mail or inter-
net facilities. And those that do have such low bandwidths and
poor terrestrial telephone connections that researchers remain
[continued next page]
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
10
Cambridge University thanks to the foresight of G.H. Hardy. While
such individual efforts may still help overcome obstacles on occa-
sion, we need a more organized and systematic programme of
action to combat the current crisis. Educational institutions and
research laboratories must be granted satellite-based high-band-
width access to the internet at low cost. At the same time, differ-
ential price strategies must be devised to allow institutions
throughout the developing world to obtain the most recent journal
titles and most up-to-date data bases.
On both fronts, I am not optimistic. For example, a proposal by
V.S. Arunachalam of Carnegie-Mellon University in the United
States to network 100 or so of India’s academic and research cities
has yet to see the light of day. A report submitted to the then
Prime Minister, I. K. Gujral, by the Scientific Advisory Committee to
the Indian Cabinet about a year ago has not been acted upon.
Fortunately, the recommendations of the taskforce set up by Prime
Minister A.B. Vajpayee, of which M.G.K. Menon, a Fellow of TWAS,
is a key member and vice chairman, have been accepted by the gov-
ernment and will soon be implemented.
The dithering and slow pace of progress are all too characteris-
tic of the Third World. It often takes far too much time to translate
something from the realm of the possible to reality. Part of the
blame, I think, rests with the academic community itself. No one
ever complains. When things are not working out well, one must
learn to complain, protest and demand appropriate action.
As for differential pricing, both publishers
of primary journals and database producers are
reluctant to embrace such measures. In a rare
exception, the Institute for Scientific Infor-
mation, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (USA),
offers most developing country subscribers its
Science Citation Index at 50-percent discount.
Even then it is perceived as too costly.
Given all these circumstances, I would not be surprised if the
gap between the scientifically advanced nations and the others
widens even further, limiting the role of developing countries in the
production, dissemination and utilization of knowledge even more
than it is today. ■
> Subbiah Arunachalam
Subbiah Arunachalam [Arun] is a distinguished fellow in
information science at the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
in Chennai, India. This article is based on a talk he gave at the
Ninth International Conference of the International Federation of
Science Editors in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 7-11 June 1998.
The communication revolution is perceived as a liberating
force. Yet, what is most likely to happen is that scientists and
scholars in many developing countries will be among the last to
join the revolution. In India, for example, the
stock market community has a network of its
own with dedicated telephone lines, but a vast
majority of scientists do not even have tele-
phones on their desks. The low level of infor-
mation and communication technologies in
developing countries may exclude a majority of
scientists and scholars in these countries from
the collective international discourse that is so essential for active
participation in all fields of research.
Even today, when much publishing takes place in print, partic-
ipation by developing country scientists in such high impact jour-
nals as Science, Nature and Cell, remains abysmally low. The gap in
science and technology that now exists between developed and
developing countries will widen. That, in turn, could exacerbate the
“brain drain” problem and intensify the reliance that developing
nations have for knowledge developed beyond their borders.
In an earlier era, Indian mathematician, Srinivasa Ramanujan,
a genius who had not gone through a conventional training pro-
gramme, was nurtured in the intellectually stimulating ambience of
“I would not be surprisedif the gap between thescientifically advancednations and the otherswidens even further.”
411
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
T he Visiting Professorships in Science and Sustainable Development programme seeks to
address one of the major problems facing researchers in the developing world today:
limited interactions with their colleagues in other parts of the world. Jointly sponsored
by TWAS, International Council for Science (ICSU), United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Commonwealth Science Council and Earth Council, the pro-
gramme enables international scientific experts to visit universities and research centres on a
continual basis over several years.
What’s the programme's ultimate objective? According to its sponsors, the goal is “to pro-
vide developing country institutions and research groups, especially those lacking outside con-
tacts, with the opportunity to establish long-term links with world leaders in science, tech-
nology and key areas of environment and development.”
Here’s how it works. Each year, several international experts, who are conducting research
on issues of critical importance to the developing world, are given visiting professorship
appointments to Third World institutions. The appointments usually last five years. The visit-
ing professor is expected to go to the host institution a minimum of three times and stay at
least one month each time.
Programme sponsors cover the cost of airfare plus any additional travel expenses. They
also offer the professor a small honorarium. The host institution, on the other hand, agrees
to pay for expenses incurred during the professor’s stay.
Visiting professors work closely with their fellow researchers in the programme's host insti-
tutions. Through these exchanges, participants seek to strengthen existing research activities
or launch new lines of inquiry that address critical scientific, public health or technological
issues in the area or region.
“The success of the programme,” notes Mohamed H.A. Hassan, Executive Director of
TWAS, “depends on linking noted professors who have strong track records of success with
institutions eager to expand their research horizons. Combining expertise and enthusiasm is
one way to ensure the exchange is fruitful.”
Since its inception, the programme has provided funding for some 25 professors. Research
activities, ranging from lectures to workshops to laboratory experiments, have taken place in
Cuba, Mongolia, Egypt, Turkey and Zambia. In all, some 13 countries have hosted professors
participating in the programme.
For the past two years, Eva Harris, a molecular and cell biologist at the University of
California’s (Berkeley) School of Public Health, has worked with researchers at the Universidad
Mayor de San Andres’ Instituto de Servicios de Laboratorio de Diagnostico e Investigacion en
Salud (SELADIS), in La Paz, Bolivia, to develop more effective and sustainable strategies for
the diagnosis and epidemiology of such infectious diseases as tuberculosis, leishmaniasis,
Chagas disease and dengue fever. What follows is a brief discussion of her efforts.
MAKING EVERY VISIT COUNT
[continued next page]
Eva Harris is one of the scientific warriors on the frontlines of the campaign against infec-
tious diseases.
Now her efforts, which began more than a decade ago, have received a boost from the
TWAS visiting professorship programme. In 1996, she was awarded a small grant to estab-
lish a series of workshops in Bolivia. The workshops are intended to promote scientific
capacity building as a way of enhancing the ability of local entities to control infectious
diseases. This strategy involves providing training for local scientists and physicians in lab-
oratory techniques, diagnosis and epidemiology, and grant writing. Activities focus on a
particular procedure that goes by the scientific name polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
PCR enables specific fragments of DNA to be exponentially replicated so that they can
be easily detected. Put another way, PCR allows a particular pathogen to be identified by
virtue of detecting a fragment of its DNA rather than by detecting the organism itself. At
the same time, the process allows scientists and medical practitioners to obtain important
genetic information that can enhance their understanding of a disease’s epidemiology. Such
information may prove invaluable in efforts to prevent or contain the spread of an infec-
tious disease.
“PCR has many advantages over traditional methods of diagnosis,” explains Harris.
“First, it can be used for both the diagnosis and epidemiology of viral, bacterial, fungal and
parasitic diseases. As a result, the procedure enjoys a wide range of applications. Second,
in certain cases, PCR has proven to be a more effective means of disease detection than
traditional clinical-based diagnostic methods. Third, PCR can be made cost-effective
through a simple, low-cost methodology that can be easily used by local scientists and
medical practitioners who are properly trained.”
That’s where the TWAS visiting professorship programme comes into play. Harris will
visit Bolivia at least three times over the next five years to work closely with her South
American colleagues as part of a larger effort to promote the appropriate use of PCR .
“My experience with efforts at North/South cooperation have shown that two ingredi-
ents are essential for success,” Harris says. “Those from the North must have an opportu-
nity to remain active participants in the programme for extended periods. And those from
the South must feel that the programme is theirs and not simply an initiative devised and
managed by their colleagues in the North, however well-meaning they may be.”
Harris has not been one to come and run. Her efforts to increase the use of PCR in
Bolivia and throughout Latin America are now more than a decade old. The emphasis she
has placed on adapting procedures to existing conditions and training local personnel have
not only helped contain the spread of infectious diseases but have had the added benefit
of strengthening the skills of the indigenous scientific and medical community.
412
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
413
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8Success within the region has gained increasing recognition in the North as well. And
that has translated into additional resources. Harris, for example, has received grants from
the Pan American Health Organization, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology and the New England Biolabs Foundation. In addition, a number of private U.S.
biotech companies have generously donated equipment to hospitals and universities
throughout Latin America, including institutions in Bolivia. Meanwhile, in 1997 Harris was
awarded a prestigious MacArthur Fellowship in recognition of her unique contributions to
the world of public health.
Efforts to secure the TWAS visiting professor fellowship began within an informal con-
versation with her colleagues at the Universidad Mayor de San Andres in La Paz, Bolivia, in
June 1996.
“Gaining support for public health programmes in Latin America is no easy task; there
are always other competing priorities,” explains Harris. “A number of people at the univer-
sity—most notably, Susan Revollo who has since become a close colleague of mine—
thought the programme might be a good way to receive funding for travel and lodging that
would help ensure our continuous interaction over several years. We drafted and refined the
proposal over a two-week period and TWAS notified us that our application had been
approved about two months after we submitted it.”
One reason for TWAS’s confidence in Harris’s application was her track record of success.
Since the late 1980s, she has developed and refined a strategy replicated many times in
universities and health ministries throughout Latin America.
The programme consists of a series of progressively more complex workshops. Before
the first workshop begins, local scientists and physicians identify three or four diseases in
their country that deserve particular attention because of the public health risks they pose.
The initial workshops provide a theoretical and practical introduction to molecular biology
techniques. More specifically, pathogens responsible for the selected diseases are detected
and genetically characterized through the use of PCR techniques.
“By conducting the experiments themselves,” Harris explains, “workshop participants
gain first-hand experience in molecular techniques used for the diagnosis and epidemiolo-
gy of infectious diseases.”
A number of participants in the first series of workshops are then assembled into four or
five teams that participate in the second series of workshops. These teams design a pilot study
for which they collect samples and apply molecular techniques. In addition, each group
designs a larger study and writes a grant proposal designed to seek additional funding.
“The objective,” Harris notes, “is to make the projects as sustainable as possible by pro-
viding training in all the areas necessary for successful scientific investigations. At the
[continued next page]
same time, all of our projects are designed to have both scientific value and direct impacts
on local public health.”
“In the case of the initiative at the Universidad Mayor de San Andres, my colleagues
and I identified three major diseases: tuberculosis, Chagas disease and leishmaniasis. Each
of these diseases produce untold misery. For example, the disfiguring ulcerated lesions
caused by leishmaniasis afflict some 400,000 people each year, mostly impoverished inhab-
itants of tropical and subtropical regions.”
“PCR,” Harris adds, “offers an important tool in combating this sometimes deadly infec-
tious disease. Treatment for leishmaniasis is expensive, lengthy and may carry toxic side
effects. Meanwhile, the symptoms often are associated with other diseases. That means it’s
important for medical practitioners to get the diagnosis right—for the sake of both the
community and the individuals that they are serving.”
“Because PCR offers a more rapid and reliable method of diagnosis than more traditional
techniques,” Harris notes, “it’s a strategy well worth pursuing. In the case of tuberculosis,
which if left untreated can cause death, PCR allows for rapid and sensitive diagnosis. In
addition, PCR can be used to track individual stains of tuberculosis. That information can
enhance our understanding of tuberculosis transmission patterns in the community and
uncover risk factors associated with the spread of the disease. Such information often
proves invaluable in designing effective prevention and control strategies.”
So what’s next in Harris’s campaign against infectious diseases in Latin America. From
the clinics to the workshops to the additional outside funding, the effort has already
achieved impressive results. But Harris anticipates that the progress that has been made to
date is only a beginning.
This fall, local and regional researchers will return to La Paz to present and analyse the
results of their pilot studies and write grant proposals in an effort to receive funding for
future projects. Some 30 researchers from nations throughout Latin America are expected
to attend.
“I think there’s no better way of being true to the mandate of the visiting professorship
programme,” Harris adds, “than by creating an environment that is likely to advance the
region’s public health goals long after my TWAS-sponsored visits come to an end.” ■
For additional information about the programme for Visiting Professorships in Science and
Sustainable Development, please contact:
> TWAS, c/o The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Enrico Fermi
Building, Via Beirut 6, 34100 Trieste, Italy, phone: +39 040 2240 387, fax: +39 040 224559,
e-mail: [email protected].
414
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
As Director General of India’s Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR), TWAS Fellow (1993) Raghunath Anat Mashelkar heads one
of the world’s largest scientific research organizations. CSIR currently
employs more than 25,000 staff members, including 3,000 research scien-
tists with doctorates in disciplines ranging from physics to chemistry to
biology to the environmental and social sciences.
Mashelkar, born in Goa, India, was educated at the University of
Bombay where he received his doctorate in chemical engineering in 1969.
After lecturing several years at the University of Salford in the United
Kingdom, he returned to India in the mid 1970s to help launch the National
Chemical Laboratory. Mashelkar’s first-hand knowledge of scientific
research (his personal fields of study include gel science, polymer engi-
neering and fluid mechanics), combined with his administrative skills,
helped to turn the National Chemical Laboratory into a worldclass facility.
In 1995, Mashelkar became CSIR’s Director General. Since then, he has
focused the Council’s attention on a host of critical concerns now facing sci-
ence in the developing world, including issues related to technology trans-
fer, global scientific partnerships, patent protection and the need to
strengthen public support for science.
In April, while visiting TWAS headquarters in Trieste, Italy, to chair a
two-day meeting devoted to the UNESCO-TWNSO “We Can Do It” project,
Mashelkar spoke to the Editor of the TWAS Newsletter on a wide range of
topics. What follows is an excerpt from their hour-long interview.
Please trace the steps that brought you to the
position of Director General of India’s Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR).
I was born and educated in India. After receiv-
ing my Ph.D. from the University of Bombay, I was
appointed a lecturer at the University of Salford in
England. I was a young man in my early twenties
and my career was on the rise. My family was happy
to be living in England and I didn’t foresee leaving
at that time. Then I experienced an unexpected
turning point in my life. Dr. Nayadumna, Director
General of CSIR, contacted me to ask if I would
meet him in London. At the time, Indira Ghandi,
India’s Prime Minister, was deeply concerned about
the nation’s “brain drain” prob-
lem. She asked Nayadumna to
identify India’s very best scien-
tists, many of whom had migrated
elsewhere, and offer them jobs on
the spot. He told me a great opportuni-
ty was opening up in India to establish an
engineering department in the National Chemical
Laboratory and he asked if I would accept the chal-
lenge. The dream of lending a hand to the creation
of a new technically advanced India was too tempt-
ing to pass up and I said yes immediately.
Would you please describe for our readers the
state of research facilities in India 20 years ago?
At the time I started working at the National
Chemical Laboratory, the research infrastructure was
poor, particularly in my field of chemical engineer-
ing. The equipment couldn’t compare to the equip-
ment I had access to in England. Consequently, my
research options were strictly limited. This problem
was compounded by the fact that, at the time, the
Indian rupee was not convertible into dollars. As a
result, it was extremely difficult to purchase equip-
ment from foreign vendors. Several years, in fact,
often elapsed between the time you received per-
mission to buy equipment and its delivery. In short,
India’s research institutions in the 1970s had neither
the currency to buy what they needed, nor the
know-how or infrastructure to build it themselves.
This problem, however, turned into an opportu-
nity after I decided to launch a programme, based
on my own research, that did not require state-of-
the-art equipment. The effort not only proved a
success in its own right but helped shape the over-
all strategy of the National Chemical Laboratory in
the years ahead. At the time, I was a consultant for
a private company that produced synthetic fibres
with equipment it had purchased from abroad. The
company’s poly condensation reactors, which made
the fibre, were excellent machines. But the compa-
ny did not have a clue about how the machines
ROAD TOINNOVATION BEGINS WITH SCIENCE
15
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
[continued next page]
worked. For executives and line
operators alike, the reactors
were nothing more than black
boxes. I was asked to construct a
mathematical model that would
help the company better understand
the manufacturing process.
At the same time, my findings helped the
company improve the efficiency of what they were
doing. But I soon realized that I was working at the
border between scientific and industrial research,
and that I was doing the latter without compro-
mising the integrity of the former. Such an
approach is exactly the one that has come to shape
the work of the National Chemical Laboratory and,
more generally, CSIR. Industrial research at India’s
national laboratories, which has been built on a
strong scientific base, is driven by this simple fact:
If you fail to develop that base, you confine your-
self to reverse engineering, which at best only
allows you to copy what others have done. That, in
turn, puts you in a position that makes it extreme-
ly difficult to develop new products. All of this ren-
ders your scientific research less exciting and your
industrial output less profitable.
Between 1989 and 1995, you served as the head
of the National Chemical Laboratory. What goals
did you establish for the Laboratory and what
strategies did you devise to reach those goals?
The first thing I did was to try to construct a
strong intellectual framework for the Laboratory’s
work. When I became director, the Laboratory had
never been awarded a patent despite being over 40
years old. For me, only usable knowledge can cre-
ate wealth. But for that wealth to work for society
and the economy, it must be protected. Therefore,
we worked hard to ensure that the Laboratory’s
new products and services were patented. At the
same time, I brought a market orientation to the
Laboratory. Before my arrival, words like business
and management remained unpopular in India’s
national laboratories. I tried to change that atti-
tude. For example, I created a business develop-
ment department. At the beginning, many mem-
bers of the staff resisted the
effort, believing that it would
sap scarce resources and compro-
mise the integrity of their
research. But eventually they
came around. In my thinking, sci-
ence has to make economic sense if it’s
to receive funding over the long haul. At
about the same time, I was pursuing these initia-
tives at the National Chemical Laboratory, our
umbrella organization, CSIR, had established a
committee with a mandate to make the Council and
its affiliated laboratories more market savvy. CSIR’s
so-called Mashelkar report—upon which this strat-
egy was predicated—helped change the mindset of
our scientists by offering them incentives to
engage in applied science. The philosophy that
drove the report’s conclusions was this: Science
nurtures technology and technology creates
wealth. Scientists, in turn, should benefit directly
from the wealth that they have helped to create
through royalties and bonuses. The laboratories
would also benefit from such a strategy through
closer ties to industry. That, in turn, would likely
increase their revenues through licensing fees and
institutional royalties. Such revenues could make
an enormous difference in a laboratory’s annual
research budget. Yet, most importantly, an incen-
tive’s strategy would generate greater wealth for
the nation, which would reduce poverty levels and
add to the material well-being of all citizens.
What was the mindset of India’s scientists before
incentives for research were introduced?
Our scientists were busy copying. Part of the
mentality was driven by a deference for Western
technology. The thinking went like this: Scientists
in developed countries receive better education and
training, have better facilities and create better
products. We can’t possibly compete; we are simply
better off taking what they give us and doing the
best we can in recreating it. And part of the prob-
lem was due to tariff barriers, which protected
16
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
Indian firms from the fiercest
aspects of international competi-
tion. Because firms didn’t have to
worry about being buried by state-
of-the-art products and services
from abroad, they could afford to sell
products based on older technologies. To
counteract these circumstances, we needed to cre-
ate an environment that would allow our scientists
to think ahead.
CSIR’s incentive initiative, launched in the late
1980s, tried to nurture a new mentality by encour-
aging Indian scientists to become more entrepre-
neurial in their outlook. And, the government’s
decision to lower tariff barriers, enacted in early
1991, forced the nation’s industries to face the full
force of global competition. In the process, it made
business executives realize that science could help
them successfully confront the new reality created
by their exposure to international markets.
Collectively, these two decisions brought the worlds
of science and business, which had been worlds
apart throughout India’s history, closer together.
What is the future of scientific institutions in
India?
A decade ago, I said that science was becoming
a global enterprise and that India must quickly pre-
pare itself for the inevitable consequences that
would accompany this trend. We have taken impor-
tant steps in meeting this challenge, but the forces
of globalization are now stronger than ever. That’s
why it’s important for our scientists to partner not
just with domestic companies but with companies
throughout the world to develop new products and
processes.
We have made some progress in this area despite
the fact that many companies in the North initially
expressed much scepticism towards our efforts. Why,
they said, should we work with scientists from
developing countries? Why do we need them? What
would we gain from such efforts? We overcame their
doubts by making ourselves rich in intellectual cap-
ital. Such capital is cheap, it’s desirable and it’s
something that both governments and industries
across the globe are willing to pay
for. When I took over the
National Chemical Laboratory, the
amount of money generated by
licensing fees was zero. Last year, it
was US$3 million—revenues derived,
for example, from agreements with
General Electric, DuPont and Eastman Kodak.
As I like to say in speeches I give both in my coun-
try and abroad, India must stand for innovation not
imitation.
What do you think is the future of India’s CSIR?
When I became CSIR’s Director General, I hoped
to introduce changes among all CSIR institutions
similar to those that I had spearheaded at the
National Chemical Laboratory. In fact, I hoped to
take our efforts a step further and place CSIR on a
path to financial self-sufficiency. Last year, we
received 4 billion rupees (US$100 million) from the
Indian government. At the same time, we generated
2 billion rupees ($US50 million) through licensing
fees and royalties received for our technologies,
products and services. Five years ago, the Council’s
“self-generated” revenues were less than 1 million
rupees (US$250,00). The progress we have made in
our efforts to become self-sufficient has taken place
without compromising the quality of our science. In
fact, in many ways, our strategy has enhanced the
quality of our research. I like what Louis Pasteur
used to say: “There is no basic science. There is only
science and its application.” That is the spirit we
hope to maintain through CSIR’s national laboratory
system. I am firmly convinced that such a spirit
largely determines which nations succeed and which
don’t in today’s global society. The value of the
strategy, moreover, extends far beyond science into
the core values of a society by encouraging people to
believe that anything is possible and no challenge is
beyond a solution. India has often been described as
a rich country where poor people live. I hope in the
years ahead, the work of the CSIR and its affiliated
laboratories can help transform India into a rich
country where rich people live—people rich in spir-
it, intellect and material well-being. ■
17
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
TWAS Fellow (1988) Mohammad
Ahmad Hamdan has been named
Jordan’s Minister of Higher
Education. Hamdan received his
undergraduate degree from Cairo
University in Egypt and his doctor-
ate in statistical mathematics from
Sydney University in Australia. He
has taught mathematics and statis-
tics at universities in Egypt,
Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and the
United States, and he has served as
dean of faculty, students and re-
search at the University of Jordan.
Before his most recent appoint-
ment, Hamdan had been president
of both Yarmouk and Hashemite
universities in Jordan. He previous-
ly served in the capacity of Minister
of Education and Higher Education
in 1989-1990. His research areas
include analysis of categorical data
and distribution theory.
TWAS Fellow (1991) Jacob Palis,
Professor and Director of the
Instituto de Matemática Pura e
Aplicada (IMPA) in Brazil, has
been elected president of the
International Mathematical Union
NEW MATH HEAD
HAMDAN NAMED MINISTER
(IMU). He was voted into office at
IMU’s 13th General Assembly,
which was held in conjunction
with the International Congress of
Mathematicians. The joint meet-
ings took place in August in
Berlin. Palis, who was born in
Uberaba, Brazil, received his un-
dergraduate degree from the
University of Rio de Janeiro and
his doctorate from the University
of California at Berkeley. He has
served as Vice President of the
International Council for Science
(ICSU) and is a member of the
Scientific Advisory Council of the
Abdus Salam International Centre
for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in
Trieste, Italy. He has been elected
to the Brazilian Academy of
Sciences, Latin American Academy
of Sciences and Indian Academy of
Sciences. Palis’s personal fields of
interest include dynamical systems
and differential equations. With
more than 60 member countries,
IMU is the largest mathematics as-
sociation in the world. It is respon-
sible for awarding the Fields Medal,
which is comparable to the Nobel
Prize in the field of mathematics.
The South African Mission to the
European Union recently concluded
an Agreement of Cooperation in
Science and Technology that af-
fords South Africa participation in
the European Union’s Framework
Programmes. The Mission has now
launched a monthly electronic
newsletter designed to keep South
Africa’s science and technology
community up-to-date on the op-
portunities for cooperation afford-
ed by the Agreement. For addition-
al information, please contact
COOPERATIVE MISSION
Daan du Toit, Editor, SA-EU S&T,
South African Mission to the
European Union, Rue de la Loi 26
bte 14-15, 1040 Brussels, Belgium,
TWAS Fellow (1984) Alberto P.
Calderón died on 16 April 1998 at
the age of 77. Born and raised in
Argentina, Calderón received his
undergraduate degree from the
University of Buenos Aires and his
doctorate from the University of
Chicago in the United States, where
he taught for more than 25 years.
He was a member of the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences,
National Academy of Sciences
(USA), Royal Academy of Sciences
(Spain), Latin American Academy of
Sciences and Academy of Sciences
and Institut de France. Calderón re-
ceived international recognition for
his pioneering work in partial dif-
ferential equations and Fourier
analysis. His collaborative research
with Antonio Zygmund at the
University of Chicago revolution-
ized the theory of singular inte-
grals. Their findings are now known
as the Calderón-Zygmund theory.
ALBERTO CALDERÓN DIES
18
PEOPLE , PLACES, EVENTS
TWA
S N
ewsl
ette
r, V
ol.1
0 N
o.2,
Apr
-Jun
199
8
Jaco
b Pa
lis
Albe
rto
Cald
erón
Die
s
Jian SONG, former head of China’s
State Council and State Science
and Technology Commission (SSTC)
{recently reorganized into the
Ministry of Science and
Technology}, has been elected
Vice Chairperson of the Chinese
People’s Political Consultative
Conference (CPPCC), the nation’s
highest political body. In that ca-
pacity, Song will continue to focus
on national and international is-
sues related to science and tech-
nology. In addition, he will exam-
ine cross-cutting issues in educa-
tion, population, resource manage-
ment and environmental protec-
tion. The new Minister of Science
and Technology is ZHU Lilan, for-
mer executive chair of SSTC.
Throughout its existence, the com-
mission worked closely with the
Third World Network of Scientific
Organizations (TWNSO). Officials at
the newly created Ministry of
Science and Technology expect
their ties with TWNSO to remain
strong in the future.
Etim Moses Essien (TWAS Fellow,
1994) has been awarded the 1997
Nigerian National Order of Merit.
The government grants this award
to individuals whose research has
ESSIEN AWARDED
JIAN SONG ELECTED
made lasting contributions to na-
tional and international develop-
ment. Essien, who is a medical
doctor, was educated at University
College Ibadan in Nigeria and the
University of London at St.
Thompson Hospital in the United
Kingdom. He is currently a profes-
sor of haematology at the
University of Ibadan in Lagos,
Nigeria. Essien, who has taught in
England, Canada and the United
States, is a member of the Nigerian
Academy of Science, African
Academy of Science and American
Association for the Advancement
of Science. He has served as vice-
president of the International
Society for Haematology and on
several panels and committees for
the World Health Organization
(WHO). In addition to his work on
haematology, Essien has conduct-
ed research on malaria and iron de-
ficiency anaemia. In 1993, he re-
ceived a TWAS Award in Basic
Medical Science.
Marcos Moshinsky (TWAS Fellow,
1985), emeritus researcher and
professor at the Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México’s
Instituto de Física, has been
awarded the UNESCO Science Prize
MOSHINSKY HONOURED
for his contributions to theoretical
physics, particularly in the fields of
mathematical and elementary par-
ticle physics. The semi-annual
award, which includes a US$15,000
cash prize, is granted to individu-
als who make significant contribu-
tions to basic science. Moshinsky,
a native of Kiev, Ukraine, was edu-
cated at the Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de Mexico and Princeton
University. He is a member of the
Academia de la Investigacion
Científica in Mexico, Academia
Brasileira de Ciências in Brazil, the
European Academy of Arts,
Sciences and Letters, the Pontifical
Academy of Sciences, the Latin
America Academy of Sciences and
the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences in the United States.
19
PEOPLE , PLACES, EVENTSTW
AS
New
slet
ter,
Vol
.10
No.
2, A
pr-J
un 1
998
Etim
Mos
es E
ssie
n
Mar
cos
Mos
hins
ky
W H A T ’ S T W A S ?
THE THIRD WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (TWAS) WAS FOUNDED IN 1983 BY
A GROUP OF EMINENT SCIENTISTS FROM THE SOUTH UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF
THE LATE NOBEL LAUREATE ABDUS SALAM OF PAKISTAN. LAUNCHED OFFICIAL-
LY IN TRIESTE, ITALY, IN 1985 BY THE FORMER SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE
UNITED NATIONS, TWAS WAS GRANTED OFFICIAL NON-GOVERNMENTAL STATUS
BY THE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL THE SAME YEAR.
At present, TWAS has 479 members from 75 countries, 62 of which are devel-
oping countries. A Council of 12 members plus the president is responsible for
supervising all Academy affairs. It is assisted in the administration and coordi-
nation of programmes by a small secretariat of 9 persons, headed by the
Executive Director. The secretariat is located on the premises of the Abdus
Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in Trieste, Italy, which
is administered by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Orga-
nization (UNESCO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). UNESCO
is also responsible for the administration of TWAS funds and staff. A major por-
tion of TWAS funding is provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy.
The main objectives of TWAS are to:
• Recognize, support and promote excellence in scientific research in the South.
• Provide promising scientists in the South with research facilities necessary for
the advancement of their work.
• Facilitate contacts between individual scientists and institutions in the South.
• Encourage South-North cooperation between individuals and centres of schol-
arship.
TWAS was instrumental in the establishment in 1988 of the Third World Network
of Scientific Organizations (TWNSO), a non-governmental alliance of 151 scien-
tific organizations from Third World countries, whose goal is to assist in build-
ing political and scientific leadership for science-based economic development
in the South and to promote sustainable development through broad-based
partnerships in science and technology.
TWAS also played a key role in the establishment of the Third World Organiza-
tion for Women in Science (TWOWS), which was officially launched in Cairo in
1993. TWOWS has a membership of nearly 1800 women scientists from 82 Third
World countries. Its main objectives are to promote the research efforts and
training opportunities of women scientists in the Third World and to strength-
en their role in the decision-making and development processes. The secretari-
at of TWOWS is currently hosted and assisted by TWAS.
TWAS offers scientists in the Third World
a variety of grants and fellowships. To find out
more about these opportunities, check out
the TWAS web-pages! Our main page is at:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas
Want to spend some time at a research
institution in another developing country?
Investigate the South-South Fellowships:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/SS-
fellowships_form.html
Need funding for your research project?
Take a look at the TWAS Research Grants:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/RG_form.html
TWNSO runs a similar scheme, for projects
carried out in collaboration with institutions
in other countries in the South:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/TWNSO_RG_form.
html
But that’s not all TWAS has to offer.
For instance, do you need a minor spare
part for some of your laboratory equipment,
no big deal, really, but you just can’t get it
anywhere locally? Well, TWAS can help:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/SP_form.html
Would you like to invite an eminent scholar
to your institution, but need funding for
his/her travel? Examine these pages, then:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/Lect_form.html
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/Prof.html
You’re organizing a scientific conference
and would like to involve young scientists
from the region? You may find what you
are looking for here:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/SM_form.html
You’re collaborating with a colleague in
another country and would pay a short visit
to his/her laboratory? The “Short-Term
Fellowships” may be the answer:
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/ST_Fellowship.
html
COLLABORATION
CONFERENCES
TRAVEL
EQUIPMENT
GRANTS
FELLOWSHIPS
WANT TO KNOW MORE?