u n h e a l t h a designing measurement of teamstepps y s

32
UNC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Implementation Success – a Civilian Perspective Celeste Mayer, PhD, RN UNC Health Care Patient Safety Officer [email protected] 2010 TeamSTEPPS ® Collaborative June 3 rd , 2010

Upload: others

Post on 01-May-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

0

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPSImplementation Success –a Civilian Perspective

Celeste Mayer, PhD, RNUNC Health CarePatient Safety [email protected]

2010 TeamSTEPPS® CollaborativeJune 3rd, 2010

Page 2: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

1

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNCHCS TeamSTEPPS experience

• Awarded AHRQ contract, TeamSTEPPS ; Adoption in Action 10/2007• Implemented in Pediatric ICU and Surgery ICU and Respiratory

Therapy department as part of the contract• Since spread to ED, Radiology, Medicine ICU, Medicine and Surgery

Step-down units, L&D, Neonatal Critical Care Center and High-risk Ante partum/Post partum unit

• Spread at unit leaders request, not and org-wide initiative• Training

• 1.5 hours self-directed learning with video and 2 pre-readings • 1 hour interactive lecture with role play• Heavy emphasis on coaching in the unit

Page 3: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

2

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Objectives

• Learn why measurement is important• Understand different types of measurement and value of

each• Have a list of sample measurements for TeamSTEPPS

implementation• Have a list of tools to help develop new measures for

TeamSTEPPS

Page 4: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

3

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Why measure?

Only way to know if TeamSTEPPS implementation is successfulOnly way to know if change is an improvementOnly way to know if improvement is lasting

Excellent way to make improvement visible to larger organizationExcellent way to encourage continued resource supportExcellent way to sustain changeExcellent way to nudge spread

Page 5: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

4

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

What to measure?

Implementation Evaluation• What did you do for TeamSTEPPS implementation?• Was the implementation well executed?

Outcome Evaluation• What difference has TeamSTEPPS made?

– Short-term– Intermediate– Long-Term

Page 6: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

5

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Implementation Evaluation

Consider;• Goals of the implementation – action plan, training plan, time

frame• Will the measures be meaningful to the stakeholders?• Are the measures well specified?• Did you meet the goals?• Is the training well received?

Example Metrics;• Number trained, Master trainer or fundamentals• Participant training evaluations

Page 7: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

6

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Outcome Evaluation – Short-term

Consider;• Immediate goals of the training• Baseline measure

Example Metrics;• Change in knowledge or attitudes • TeamSTEPPS knowledge and attitudes test

Page 8: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

7

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Outcome Evaluation – Intermediate

Consider;• Goals following training for change in behavior • Baseline will be needed• Likely to include observation, are the resources available?• Are the measures well specified?• Collect stories to support

Page 9: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

8

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Outcome Evaluation – Intermediate cont.

Example Metrics;• Change in Leadership, Communication, Mutual Support, and Situation Monitoring

behavior (observation)– TENTS– CATS– TeamSTEPPS Team Performance Observation tool

• Use of TeamSTEPPS tools that are part of the implementation design– Count of interdisciplinary AM rounds– Count of scheduled huddles– Count of post event (intubation, RRT call, etc) debriefings

• Reflective journals• Interview• Focus group • Supporting stories

– Harm/error prevented– Better approaches to fostering interpersonal relations

Page 10: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

9

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Value of Demonstrating Early Wins (Intermediate Outcomes)

Create some visible, unambiguous successes as soon as possible (6-18 months)

• Visible to large numbers of people• Unambiguous• Clearly related to the change effort

Why?• Provide evidence that sacrifices are worth it• Demonstrates that the intervention is adopted• Reward change agents with a pat on the back• Help fine-tune vision and strategies• Undermine cynics and self-serving resisters• Keep bosses on board• Build momentum

Page 11: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

10

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Outcome Evaluation – Long-term

Consider;• Qualitative and Quantitative changes as a result of knowledge,

attitude and behavior change goals• Baseline will be needed• Can be more difficult to demonstrate a direct relationship (but

worth it to try)

Page 12: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

11

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Outcome Evaluation – Long-term cont.

Example Metrics;• Clinical measures (process and outcome)

– Infection rates– Mortality, 30-day Mortality, 30-day Readmission rates– Reduced time for decisions or action

• Perception change– Patient Safety Culture Survey– Employee Satisfaction Survey– Patient Satisfaction Survey

• Change in frequency of adverse events (Global Trigger Tool), patient complaints, disruptive behavior corrective action

Page 13: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

12

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Demonstrating Success to Facilitate Spread(Using intermediate and long-term measures)

Spread influence• Difficult to decide if it will be worthwhile• Value needs to be visible• Need to demonstrate good feedback and monitoring processes• Conformers (early and late majority and laggards) are more driven

by performance and monitoring measures

Page 14: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

13

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Measuring Spread

Awareness• Monitor communication activity based on plan• Track inquiries for information• Attempt to learn what motivated inquiries

Decision• Has a commitment to implement been made

Implementation• Stage of implementation; training of change/leadership team, action

planning steps, design of training, etc.

Learn from Failure• Increases understanding and may aid development of standards

Page 15: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

14

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Implementation (unit level)• Training evaluation – used the standard required for continuing

education credit at UNC• Number trained – tracked the percent of staff trained during

implementation, goal was 100%• Not included on Dashboard but reported back to implementation

leadership team

Page 16: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

15

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Outcome - Short-Term (unit level)• Knowledge and Attitude Change post initial training• TeamSTEPPS Attitudes Questionnaire • TeamSTEPPS Learning Benchmarks• Not included on Dashboard but reported back to implementation

leadership team

Page 17: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

16

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Outcome – Intermediate (unit level)• Count of huddles completed as planned – marked on calendar• Use of debriefing form• Collecting and sharing stories• Observations – example next slide

Other examples provided by collaborative participants• Compliance with surgical safety checklist• Compliance with Multidisciplinary rounds• Diary• Unplanned extubation• Anecdotes of staff empowerment and use of TeamSTEPPS tools

Page 18: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

17

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Page 19: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

18

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

Measures of Outcome - Long-Term (org level) • Clinical measures (process and outcome)

– Infection rates– Reduced time for decisions or action – Perception change - dimensions or questions related to teamwork – examples next slides

• Patient Safety Culture Survey • Employee Satisfaction Survey• Patient Satisfaction Survey

Other examples provided by collaborative participants• Mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission rate• Core Measures• Ventilator associated pneumonia and Central Line Associated Bloodstream infection

rate• Sentinel events, patient falls, Medication reconcilliation

Page 20: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

19

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Outcome - Long-Term (org level)% of units reaching 90th %tile

Red – TS areasBlue – Non-TS areas

Page 21: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

20

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Measures of Outcome - Long-Term (org level)% of units reaching goal

Page 22: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

21

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Outcome - Long-Term (unit level)Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Page 23: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

22

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Sustainment (unit and org level) –example of spreadsheet next slide

• Percent of TeamSTEPPS Units sustaining improvement• Use selected measurable change

– Interdisciplinary AM rounds– Scheduled huddles– Debrieifing– Periodic observation– Reduced time for decisions or action – examples next slides

Page 24: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

23

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Unit/AreaTotal # non-MD

staff

# w/ basic

training

# Master Trainer

s

% non-MD staff trained

Total # attendin

gs & fellows

Total # resident

s

# w/ basic

training

# Master Trainers

% MD staff

trained

Total non-MD and MD

staff

Ratio of Master

Trainers

1 CICC

2 5 Children's

3 6 Children's

4 7 Children's

5 PICU

6 NCCC

7 CSSU

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

Measures of Sustainment (org level) – track quarterly

Page 25: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

24

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Sustainment – Unit level

Page 26: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

25

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard

UNC Measures of Spread (org level)

Page 27: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

26

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Tips to Remember

SMART goals• Specific• Measurable• Achievable• Realistic • Time-based

Is the data collection for measurement burdensome?Do you have a plan for ongoing measurement?Can at least some of the measures be directly attributed to the

TeamSTEPPS implementation?Are the measures useful at the unit/area and organization level?Are the results presented in a way that is easy to understand?

Page 28: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

27

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Summary – Why measure?

• Understand and improve your program• Test the theory underlying your program • Tell your program’s story• Be accountable• Inform the field• Ongoing budget support

Source - Innovation Network

• Shows respect for hours and hours of time many have devoted to TeamSTEPPS Implementation on faith that it’s the right thing

• Helps sustain momentum and furthers continued innovation at the unit level• Positive results reward senior leadership support• Facilitates spread

UNC Health Care Experience

Page 29: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

28

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Measurement Tools

UNC Health Care System TeamSTEPPS Dashboard• http://www.med.unc.edu/cce/programs-initiatives/teamstepps

Will It Work Here? A Decisionmaker’s Guide to Adopting Innovations• http://www.innovations.ahrq.gov/resources/InnovationAdoptionGuide.pdf

The Innovation Network workbook to plan an evaluation of implementation and outcomes

• http://www.innonet.org/client_docs/File/evaluation_plan_workbook.pdf

Institute for Healthcare Improvement - Improvement Tracker • http://www.ihi.org/ihi/workspace/tracker/

Page 30: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

29

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Knowledge and Attitudes Tests

TeamSTEPPS Attitudes Questionnaire

TeamSTEPPS Learning Benchmarks

Page 31: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

30

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

Observation Tools

TeamSTEPPS Team Performance Observation Tool

Communication and Teamwork Skills Assessment (CATS)Frankel, Gardner, Maynard, Kelly. Using the Communication and

Teamwork Skills (CATS) Assessment to Measure Health Care Team Performance, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and PatientSafety, September 2007, Vol. 33, No. 9: 549–558.

Teamwork Evaluation of Non-Technical Skills (TENTS)Hohenhaus, Powell, Haskins. A Practical Approach to Observation of

the Emergency Care Setting, Journal of Emergency Nursing, April 2008;34:142-4.

Page 32: U N H E A L T H A Designing Measurement of TeamSTEPPS Y S

31

U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 U N C    H

 E A L T H

    C A R E    S Y S T E M

 

References

AHRQ 08-0051, Will It Work Here? A Decisionmaker's Guide to Adopting Innovations, September 2008

Fraser, S., Accelerating the Spread of Good Practice, A Workbook for Health Care, 2002

Kotter, J., Our Iceberg Is Melting, 2005Kotter, J., Leading Change, 1996Langly, G., Nolan, K., Nolan, T., Norman, C., & Provost, L., The

Improvement Guide, A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance, 1996