uc leaf flash evaluations › content › dam › uc › orgs › ucleaf › docs › thirdy… ·...

UC LEAF

Flash Evaluations

Section 17.3

0.00% 0

16.67% 2

83.33% 10

Q1 What member of the University are you?Answered: 12 Skipped: 2

Total Respondents: 12

# Other (please specify) Date

1 mid-career faculty 4/15/2014 11:41 AM

2 Associate Dean 4/14/2014 10:42 AM

GraduateStudent

Junior Faculty

Senior Faculty

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Answer Choices Responses

Graduate Student

Junior Faculty

Senior Faculty

1 / 7

Diane Halpern Survey

28.57% 4

28.57% 4

35.71% 5

7.14% 1

0.00% 0

0.00% 0

14.29% 2

21.43% 3

7.14% 1

Q2 Which Halpern events did you attend?Choose all that apply.

Answered: 14 Skipped: 0

Total Respondents: 14

Breakfast withSenior Facul...

Talk withSenior Facul...

GeneralAssembly Talk

Talk withSenior Facul...

Breakfast withWomen STEM...

Meeting withGrad Student...

Lunch withWomen STEM...

ResearchIncubator

Meeting withGrad Student...

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Breakfast with Senior Faculty CEAS

Talk with Senior Faculty A&S

General Assembly Talk

Talk with Senior Faculty in Medicine

Breakfast with Women STEM Faculty in Medicine and A&S

Meeting with Grad Student Women in A&S

Lunch with Women STEM Faculty in CEAS

Research Incubator

Meeting with Grad Student Women in Medicine

2 / 7


Q3 Please rate the community conversationAnswered: 14 Skipped: 0

0.00%0

21.43%3

21.43%3

57.14%8

0.00%0

14

3.36

(no label)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Total Average Rating

(no label)

3 / 7


Q4 Please rate the learning/professionaldevelopment


7.69%1

30.77%4

38.46%5

23.08%3

0.00%0

13

2.77

(no label)

0 1 2 3 4 5


(no label)

4 / 7


Q5 Please rate the overall eventAnswered: 13 Skipped: 1

0.00%0

23.08%3

53.85%7

15.38%2

7.69%1

13

3.08

(no label)

0 1 2 3 4 5


(no label)

5 / 7


Q6 What was the most positive outcome ofattending the event(s) for you?


# Responses Date

1 nothing, really. The event did not provide the content I was seeking. 4/15/2014 11:41 AM

2 Reinforcement of our initial diversity search plans. 4/15/2014 10:02 AM

3 Discussion with other female faculty members in CEAS 4/14/2014 7:37 PM

4 Interacting with a couple faculty who I had never spoken with before, on some common interests. 4/14/2014 4:07 PM

5 Conversation with Dr. Halpern 4/14/2014 12:34 PM

6 Learning latest research on women in academe 4/14/2014 12:16 PM

7 good exposure to the challlenges and problems facing underrepresented groups in STEM 4/14/2014 11:13 AM

8 meeting a few other faculty with overlapping interests 4/14/2014 11:08 AM

9 The data and trends she presented 4/14/2014 10:42 AM

10 Bringing the issue to a broad audience 4/14/2014 10:41 AM

11 The morning meeting was very good, and opened my eyes to institutional changes that are needed (e.g., to RPT,to the way that the University judges the "success" of a Ph.D. program and its graduates).

4/14/2014 10:39 AM

12 Meeting other STEM faculty 4/14/2014 10:30 AM

13 Learned about serious problems in College of Medicine regarding promotions and other professionaldevelopment issues.

4/14/2014 10:27 AM

14 open discussion of key issues among different disciplines 4/14/2014 10:27 AM

6 / 7


Q7 How can the LEAF program better serveyou and your colleagues?


# Responses Date

1 ? 4/15/2014 11:41 AM

2 I would certainly appreciate a reminder to the speakers to focus on success strategies rather than problemidentification. Right now, it seems they are focused about 95/5% and I would certainly like to get some goodideas from them. I would suggest 20/80% but would be pleased even if it were 80/20%.

4/15/2014 10:02 AM

3 I'm not sure 4/14/2014 7:37 PM

4 No suggestions 4/14/2014 4:07 PM

5 Focus on sustainalbe policy changes imagined with a doable timeline. 4/14/2014 12:34 PM

6 Attract broader participation 4/14/2014 12:16 PM

7 Need more focus on viable solutions. Too much discussion on the problem with very little on what can be done tofix it.

4/14/2014 11:13 AM

8 I'm not sure - it seems like the initiatives are generally pretty successful 4/14/2014 11:08 AM

9 Continue what they are doing 4/14/2014 10:42 AM

10 Avoid dichotomizations of male vs female without investigaing role of race, ethnicity, and resource access thatnuance these differences. I thought it somewhat ironic that the person who apparently critiqued the "Bell Curve"or the fallacous and simplistic divisioning between African Americans and Whites would distill the complexities ofvery real gender inequities in a not dissimilar manner. There is no doubt about resource access limitations forwomen as opposed to the privileging of men, but surely there are more complex thinkers around attempting toaddress these complexities. This might be addressed better when welling up from the disciplines of sociology oranthropology.

4/14/2014 10:41 AM

11 Might be a good idea to have a more extensive survey, or at least provide an enhanced opportunity to send infeedback. I had very different feelings about the morning discussion as opposed to the afternoon presentation,but this form doesn't provide an opportunity for substantive feedback.

4/14/2014 10:39 AM

12 Offer more action items with discussions 4/14/2014 10:30 AM

13 Can you convince Dr. Ono that morale is terrible in the College of Medicine and something must be done beforeall of our best faculty leave.

4/14/2014 10:27 AM

14 foster open discussion of the important of issues of gender and diversity on the faculty 4/14/2014 10:27 AM

7 / 7


Q1 Please rate the following:Answered: 5 Skipped: 0

Meeting Room

Schedule ofEvents/ Agenda

Presentation

CommunityConversation...

1 / 10

FORTE: Strengthening Your Research Program

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

40.00%2

40.00%2

5

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent

NetworkingOpportunity

Learning /Professional...

Overall Event

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Total

Meeting Room

Schedule of Events/ Agenda

2 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

40.00%2

40.00%2

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

Presentation

Community Conversations / Discussion

Networking Opportunity

Learning / Professional Development

Overall Event

3 / 10



I gained newknowledge an...

I will use theknowledge an...

This activitywas relevant...

The event wasworth my tim...

4 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

40.00%2

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

40.00%2

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

40.00%2

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%1

20.00%1

60.00%3

5

Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree

Strongly agree

This programwill positiv...

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree

Disagree Neither agree nordisagree

Agree Stronglyagree

Total

I gained new knowledge and skills from this activity

I will use the knowledge and skills I gained from thisactivity

This activity was relevant to me professionally orpersonally

The event was worth my time / investment

This program will positively impact me

5 / 10


Q3 What ideas do you have about how tomake future FORTE events more

meaningful or interactive?Answered: 2 Skipped: 3

# Responses Date

1 Survey participants before the event 9/25/2014 11:00 AM

2 I liked today's format - worked for me. 9/25/2014 10:31 AM

6 / 10


Q4 What are other ways that the LEAFprogram can support women and

underrepresented minority faculty?Answered: 2 Skipped: 3

# Responses Date

1 Invite female speakers 9/25/2014 11:00 AM

2 Networking opportunities on a regular basis. 9/25/2014 10:31 AM

7 / 10


Q5 What about this presentation was MOSTuseful to you?Answered: 3 Skipped: 2

# Responses Date

1 moderators were excellent! 9/25/2014 11:02 AM

2 Discussion on collaboration 9/25/2014 11:00 AM

3 Informal discussion style 9/25/2014 10:31 AM

8 / 10


Q6 What about this presentation wasLEAST useful to you?


# Responses Date

1 Discussion on grants 9/25/2014 11:00 AM

2 n/a 9/25/2014 10:31 AM

9 / 10


100.00% 1

0.00% 0

Q7 Have you participated in otherprofessional development programs

through the LEAF program?Answered: 1 Skipped: 4

Total 1

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10



Meeting Room


Presentationby Lori Peek


1 / 10

UC LEAF / Sociology Visiting Scholar: Lori Peek

12.50%1

0.00%0

25.00%2

37.50%3

25.00%2

8

0.00%0

14.29%1

0.00%0

57.14%4

28.57%2

7




Overall Event

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room


2 / 10


0.00%0

12.50%1

0.00%0

37.50%3

50.00%4

8

12.50%1

0.00%0

25.00%2

25.00%2

37.50%3

8

28.57%2

14.29%1

0.00%0

42.86%3

14.29%1

7

14.29%1

14.29%1

0.00%0

57.14%4

14.29%1

7

12.50%1

0.00%0

12.50%1

37.50%3

37.50%3

8

Presentation by Lori Peek




Overall Event

3 / 10







4 / 10


12.50%1

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%4

37.50%3

8

12.50%1

12.50%1

12.50%1

50.00%4

12.50%1

8

12.50%1

0.00%0

25.00%2

37.50%3

25.00%2

8

12.50%1

0.00%0

0.00%0

37.50%3

50.00%4

8

12.50%1

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%4

37.50%3

8


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10


Q3 What ideas do you have about how tomake future events meaningful or

interactive?Answered: 2 Skipped: 6

6 / 10




7 / 10



8 / 10




9 / 10


50.00% 4

50.00% 4

Q7 Have you participated in other programsthrough LEAF?Answered: 8 Skipped: 0

Total 8

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10



Meeting Room


Presentationby Lori Peek


1 / 10

Lori Peek Small Group

0.00%0

0.00%0

25.00%1

50.00%2

25.00%1

4

0.00%0

25.00%1

0.00%0

50.00%2

25.00%1

4




Overall Event

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room


2 / 10


0.00%0

25.00%1

0.00%0

25.00%1

50.00%2

4

0.00%0

25.00%1

0.00%0

25.00%1

50.00%2

4

0.00%0

25.00%1

0.00%0

75.00%3

0.00%0

4

25.00%1

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%2

25.00%1

4

0.00%0

25.00%1

0.00%0

25.00%1

50.00%2

4

Presentation by Lori Peek




Overall Event

3 / 10







4 / 10


0.00%0

33.33%1

0.00%0

66.67%2

0.00%0

3

0.00%0

33.33%1

0.00%0

66.67%2

0.00%0

3

0.00%0

0.00%0

25.00%1

50.00%2

25.00%1

4

0.00%0

25.00%1

0.00%0

50.00%2

25.00%1

4

0.00%0

0.00%0

25.00%1

50.00%2

25.00%1

4


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10




# Responses Date

1 a bit more structured? 10/18/2014 3:07 PM

6 / 10




# Responses Date

There are no responses.

7 / 10



# Responses Date

1 As the graduate director in my program, it was especially useful to learn about the concerns of some of ourwomen graduate students.

10/14/2014 2:25 PM

2 I am very happy this event took place. I was one of the sociology faculty members to attend. The grad studentsasked questions about work/family, gender at work, etc. It felt like a conversation that we should have alreadyhad, but hadn't. Thanks!

10/14/2014 12:39 PM

8 / 10




# Responses Date


9 / 10


75.00% 3

25.00% 1

Q7 Have you participated in other programsthrough LEAF?Answered: 4 Skipped: 0

Total 4

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10



Meeting Room

Food


Presentationby Speaker

1 / 10

Diversity Breakfast




Overall Event

2 / 10

Diversity Breakfast

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.25%2

50.00%16

43.75%14

32

0.00%0

0.00%0

16.13%5

38.71%12

45.16%14

31

0.00%0

3.13%1

15.63%5

37.50%12

43.75%14

32

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.25%2

40.63%13

53.13%17

32

12.50%2

12.50%2

6.25%1

43.75%7

25.00%4

16

15.38%4

19.23%5

7.69%2

34.62%9

23.08%6

26

0.00%0

3.23%1

12.90%4

38.71%12

45.16%14

31

0.00%0

0.00%0

13.33%4

43.33%13

43.33%13

30


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room

Food


Presentation by Speaker




Overall Event

3 / 10

Diversity Breakfast






4 / 10

Diversity Breakfast

0.00%0

0.00%0

9.38%3

59.38%19

31.25%10

32

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.25%2

50.00%16

43.75%14

32

0.00%0

0.00%0

3.13%1

50.00%16

46.88%15

32

0.00%0

0.00%0

3.13%1

43.75%14

53.13%17

32

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

53.13%17

46.88%15

32


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10

Diversity Breakfast



# Responses Date

1 Have more time or fewer speakers or keep them on a stricter time schedule. There was no time for discussion,which was apparently on point on the agenda

11/5/2014 12:03 PM

2 More time so the tables can use the discussion questions 11/5/2014 12:02 PM

3 No time for discussion 11/5/2014 12:00 PM

4 Bigger room to mingle. Later time than 8am. Some people aren't chatty this early. 11/5/2014 11:59 AM

5 Have a little more time to interact with attendees 11/5/2014 11:57 AM

6 Encourage people to bring business cards 11/5/2014 11:56 AM

7 More discussion, interactive conversations 11/5/2014 11:54 AM

8 Explain why this activity is relevant to the aim 11/5/2014 11:52 AM

9 Have opportunities talk to each other and listening to some stories. We learn stories today not much time tointeract with each other.

11/5/2014 11:50 AM

10 Have babysitters on the side to make sure younger women attend 11/5/2014 11:43 AM

11 Stay on time 11/5/2014 11:42 AM

12 time/structure for networking; slightly shorter program 11/5/2014 11:37 AM

13 Watch program time 11/5/2014 11:36 AM

14 Moderator to limit speaker time 11/5/2014 11:32 AM

15 -more time for networking -start a UC LEAF group on LinkedIn 11/5/2014 11:30 AM

16 Interactive/Discussion - like idea of happy hour 11/5/2014 11:25 AM

6 / 10

Diversity Breakfast



# Responses Date

1 Have time for networking and discussion 11/5/2014 12:03 PM

2 Support group meetings, social events 11/5/2014 12:02 PM

3 Invite junior women in to talk about their paths and aspirations since this panel was so experienced 11/5/2014 11:59 AM

4 Events in which we have a chance to meet one-on-one with the speakers 11/5/2014 11:57 AM

5 Pair up women with women mentors based on cases of experience foreign medical gradates may be included 11/5/2014 11:54 AM

6 Facilitate speakers to speak to students 11/5/2014 11:52 AM

7 A group of mixed rank of professors, associate and assisting together, have a group meeting, rotating / routine(?). After a term, witch to other group, some have chance to interact with others as well.

11/5/2014 11:50 AM

8 More mentoring program, for all different levels 11/5/2014 11:43 AM

9 Have "own" funding - like Schmidlapp 11/5/2014 11:42 AM

10 Events like this, internal events encourage rewards 11/5/2014 11:36 AM

11 -mentoring program for staff & postdocs -shadowing 11/5/2014 11:30 AM

12 More on how to integrate/balance work and life responsibilities 11/5/2014 11:25 AM

7 / 10

Diversity Breakfast

Q5 What about this presentation was MOSTuseful to you?


# Responses Date

1 Good inspiration 11/5/2014 12:03 PM

2 The inspiration speeches 11/5/2014 12:02 PM

3 Hearing the individual stories 11/5/2014 12:00 PM

4 Advice 11/5/2014 11:59 AM

5 The speakers had very insightful points 11/5/2014 11:57 AM

6 helpful tips 11/5/2014 11:56 AM

7 Different paths from successful women in academia 11/5/2014 11:54 AM

8 Stories - but there were too many 11/5/2014 11:52 AM

9 Learn stories from others 11/5/2014 11:50 AM

10 Loved Sue Ott Rowlands too - nice to hear someone like UC. Dr Karen Bankston - Wonderful! Very inspiring.She is new to academia and has had similar observations. Not willing to give up.

11/5/2014 11:47 AM

11 How to survive and thrive in leadership 11/5/2014 11:43 AM

12 Very diverse speakers courage, speak, models 11/5/2014 11:42 AM

13 Learning from leaders 11/5/2014 11:32 AM

14 Hearing Personal Stories 11/5/2014 11:32 AM

15 Karen Bankstow, Awatef Hamad - Wonderful! 11/5/2014 11:31 AM

16 -tips from each speaker; lessons learned 11/5/2014 11:30 AM

17 Lessons & paths 11/5/2014 11:27 AM

18 Opportunity to listen to these personal stories and reflect on my own 11/5/2014 11:25 AM

19 Lessons & Paths 11/5/2014 11:15 AM

8 / 10

Diversity Breakfast



# Responses Date

1 Too many speakers and no time for discussion. A few talks and then discussion or at least questions 11/5/2014 12:03 PM

2 The tie limit, the event should be longer 8am-10am 11/5/2014 12:02 PM

3 Too many panelists 11/5/2014 12:00 PM

4 They did not address work life balance 11/5/2014 11:59 AM

5 Would like to hear about tips to leadership 11/5/2014 11:54 AM

6 It was too general 11/5/2014 11:52 AM

7 Not obvious 11/5/2014 11:50 AM

8 Dr Hamed. Spent time telling us about her accomplishments instead of telling inspiring stories. Little too longoverall

11/5/2014 11:47 AM

9 Would have liked more network time - Also went over time 11/5/2014 11:36 AM

10 n/a 11/5/2014 11:32 AM

9 / 10

Diversity Breakfast

40.00% 10

60.00% 15



Total 25

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10

Diversity Breakfast

Ready Set Go: Hiring: Effective Interviewing, Evaluation

and AfterwardsOctober 11, 2012

Center for the Enhancement of Teaching & Learning (CET&L)

www.uc.edu/cetl Email: [email protected]

Report generated: June 26, 2013

RSG: Hiring, October 2012

This is the assessment results from your program. It shows strengths and areas of improvement by measuring

participant confidence in skills/material presented, and the probability of using the program materials/skills

in their professional lives here at UC. This information can be useful in improving our programs and ensuring

that our programs meet the needs of our audience. The following tables and graphs identify the demographic

characteristics and question responses of the 6 participants who attended your session and completed an as-

sessment.

Academic rank of program participants.

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

0 0 0

4

0 0 0

2

Rank Count

Graduate Assistant 0

Adjunct Faculty 0

Educator 0

Assistant Professor 4

Associate Professor 0

Full Professor 0

Professor Emeritus 0

Other 2

Total Responses 6

100% completed this question.

1


Why did you participate in this program?R

espo

nses

2

4

6

8

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

2

1 1 1

5

0

Response Count

Teaching Assessment 0

Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 2

Pedagogical Interest 1

Colleague Suggestion 1

Interdisciplinary Conversations 1

Career Development 5

Other 0

Total Responses 6


2


When do you intend to apply the information learned in this

program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

4

0 0

2

0 0

Response Count

Immediately 4

Within the current semester 0

Next semester 0

The next time it is relevant 2

I don’t know 0

Never 0

Total Responses 6


3


As a result of this program I learned . . .

The most common responses to this open-ended question included:

• The best way to find the right candidates

• How to evaluate candidates objectively

Other comments from program participants. . .

• The discussion with the activity was great

• Consider making time for a discussion of everyone’ past real world experience

4


Program Content & Outcomes

Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*

The outcomes of the program were clearly defined 6 0% 0% 0% 17% 83% 4.8 0.4

The stated learning outcomes were achieved 6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

The amount of material covered was appropriatefor the time allotted

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

The resources (e.g., handouts, websites, etc.) werea useful supplement to the program content

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

The program content was easy to understand 6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

The activities/discussions were helpful in learningthe subject matter

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

The program provided me with the tools andstrategies to improve my effectiveness and effi-ciency

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I was able to engage in interdisciplinary conversa-tions during this program

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

My goals and expectations for this workshop weremet

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I intend to share the knowledge I acquired fromthis program with others

6 0% 0% 0% 17% 83% 4.8 0.4

I would recommend this program to a colleague 6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I would attend another CET&L pro-gram/workshop

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

Note: For explanation of values in this table see p. 5.

7


Supplementary Questions Specific to this Program

Participant confidence in the material addressed at the program

Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I understand the importance of staffing the labwith the right people

6 0% 0% 0% 33% 67% 4.7 0.5

I can differentiate between employees roles, in-cluding postdocs, and students

6 0% 0% 17% 17% 67% 4.5 0.8

I am able to craft appropriate interview ques-tions

6 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 4.5 0.5

I can effectively evaluate candidates 6 0% 0% 17% 33% 50% 4.3 0.8

I am knowledgeable about the University ofCincinnati’s hiring policies and procedures

5 0% 40% 0% 40% 20% 3.4 1.3

I can plan for a new hire orientation 6 0% 17% 17% 50% 17% 3.7 1.0


8


How useful this information was to participants

Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will work to staff the lab with the right peo-ple

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I intend to differentiate the roles of my em-ployees, including postdocs and students

6 0% 0% 17% 33% 50% 4.3 0.8

I will employ appropriate interview questionsduring the hiring process

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I will use the techniques presented during to-day’s program to evaluate candidates

6 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I will apply the University of Cincinnati’s hir-ing policies and procedures during the hiringprocess

6 0% 0% 40% 20% 40% 4.0 1.0

I will plan a new hire orientation 6 0% 0% 67% 17% 17% 3.5 0.8


9

Ready Set Go: Setting the Tone of Your LabNovember 8, 2012




RSG: Lab Tone, Nov. 2012





characteristics and question responses of the 12 participants who attended your session and completed an

assessment.


Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

10

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

1 10

8

01

0 0

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 1

Educator 0



Full Professor 1


Other 0

Total Responses 12


1



espo

nses

5

10

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

43

1 1

11

0

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 4





Other 0

Total Responses 12


2



program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

5

1 1

3

0 0

Response Count

Immediately 5


Next semester 1


I don’t know 0

Never 0

Total Responses 10

83.33% completed this question.

3




• How to deal with certain situations

• Creating awareness tools

• Better management for my lab

• There is a lot to consider for lab tone


• Consider providing slides to participants.

• Consider using worksheets interspersed with powerpoint slides.

• Consider providing more time for discussion.

• Consider providing case studies or vignettes.

• Consider examples for non-lab based research groups (e.g. geology, etc.)

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




12 8% 0% 17% 67% 8% 3.7 1.0


12 0% 8% 8% 75% 8% 3.8 0.7



12 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 4.2 0.5


11 0% 0% 18% 73% 9% 3.9 0.5


11 0% 9% 27% 45% 18% 3.7 0.9


11 0% 9% 9% 73% 9% 3.8 0.8


11 0% 0% 36% 55% 9% 3.7 0.6



11 0% 0% 18% 55% 27% 4.1 0.7


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I have managerial style consistent with mypersonality

10 0% 0% 20% 70% 10% 3.9 0.6

I can integrate different managerial aspects(i.e. policies, ethics, operations) into an iden-tifiable lab culture

10 0% 10% 30% 60% 0% 3.5 0.7

I can integrate professionalism in all aspectsof lab conduct

10 0% 0% 20% 80% 0% 3.8 0.4

I understand how to mange the financial as-pects of my lab

10 0% 10% 50% 30% 10% 3.4 0.8

I can formulate a 5-year plan for my labora-tory

10 0% 0% 20% 80% 0% 3.8 0.4

I can recognize when my lab is becoming dys-functional

10 0% 0% 30% 70% 0% 3.7 0.5

if my lab becomes dysfunctional, I can formu-late intervention strategies

10 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 3.5 0.5


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will employ managerial style consistent withmy personality

9 0% 0% 11% 67% 22% 4.1 0.6

I will integrate different managerial aspects(i.e. policies, ethics, operations) into an in-dentifiable lab culture

9 0% 0% 22% 78% 0% 3.8 0.4

I will practice professionalism in all aspects oflab conduct

9 0% 0% 0% 67% 33% 4.3 0.5

I will use the material presented during to-day’s program when managing the financialaspects of my lab

9 0% 0% 44% 44% 11% 3.7 0.7

I will formulate a 5-year strategic plan for mylaboratory

9 0% 0% 11% 67% 22% 4.1 0.6

I will use the intervention strategies presentedin today’s session to address issues that arisein my lab

9 0% 0% 11% 78% 11% 4.0 0.5


9

Ready Set Go: Personnel/Conflict ManagementDecember 13, 2012




RSG: Personnel/Conflict Management, December 2012






assessment.


Res

pons

es

2

4

6

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

0

1 1

4

3

0 0

1

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 1

Educator 1



Full Professor 0


Other 1

Total Responses 10


1



espo

nses

2

4

6

8

10

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

01

2 2

0

3

8

1

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 1

Research Interest 2





Other 1

Total Responses 10


2



program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

10

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

8

2

0 0 0 0

Response Count

Immediately 8


Next semester 0


I don’t know 0

Never 0

Total Responses 10


3




• Effective communication

• Records keeping

• How to assess personal performance

• Improving my mentoring skills


• “I really enjoyed this program”

• “There was great participation from other participants”

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




8 0% 0% 12% 75% 12% 4.0 0.5


8 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 4.0 0.8



8 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 4.2 0.5


8 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 3.8 0.9


8 0% 0% 12% 38% 50% 4.4 0.7


8 0% 0% 25% 62% 12% 3.9 0.6


8 0% 12% 0% 75% 12% 3.9 0.8



8 0% 0% 0% 62% 38% 4.4 0.5


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I can articulate how personnel and perfor-mance issues are located within a broaderframework of job performance.

9 0% 0% 22% 56% 22% 4.0 0.7

I can identify the most appropriate places tofocus imrovement efforts.

9 0% 0% 11% 78% 11% 4.0 0.5

I can assess your own lab’s performacne eval-uation process relative to the model presentedin the workshop in order to identify and im-plement specific changes.

9 0% 0% 44% 44% 11% 3.7 0.7

I can frame messages about the lab and itsworkers to better manage the discourse withinthe lab that is critical to maintaining a pro-ductive environment

9 0% 0% 22% 44% 33% 4.1 0.8

I know how to practice introducing perfor-mance issues to individual employees so thatyou can be comfortable when it comes timefor you to discuss performance problems witha member of your staff

9 0% 0% 11% 78% 11% 4.0 0.5


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will choose the mose appropriate places tofocus your improvement efforts

9 0% 0% 0% 89% 11% 4.1 0.3

I will assess my own lab’s performace evalu-ation process relative to the model presentedin the workshop in order to identify specificchanges to implement

9 0% 0% 11% 56% 33% 4.2 0.7

I will frame messages about the lab andits workders to better manage the discorusewithin the lab that is critical to maintaining aproductive environment

9 0% 0% 0% 78% 22% 4.2 0.4

I will practice introducing performance issuesto individual employees so that you can becomfortable when it comes time for me to dis-cuss performance problems with a member ofmy staff.

9 0% 0% 0% 78% 22% 4.2 0.4


9

Ready Set Go: Funding ResearchJanuary 10, 2013



Report generated: May 2, 2013

RSG–Funding Research





characteristics and question responses of the 21 out of 25 total participants who attended your session and

completed an assessment.


Res

pons

es

5

10

15

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

1 10

12

0 0 0

7

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 1

Educator 0



Full Professor 0


Other 7

Total Responses 21


1



espo

nses

5

10

15

20

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

19

0

31

16

1

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 19





Other 1

Total Responses 21


2



program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

10

12

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

2

9

1

6

2

0

Response Count

Immediately 2


Next semester 1


I don’t know 2

Never 0

Total Responses 20

95.24% completed this question.

3




• There is a lot of funding available for faculty

• About central sources of support

• About resources for faculty support

• Types of awards

• Eligibility for awards

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




18 0% 0% 10% 60% 30% 4.3 0.6


17 0% 0% 20% 60% 20% 4.0 0.6



17 0% 0% 10% 50% 50% 4.4 0.6


18 0% 0% 20% 60% 30% 4.1 0.7


18 10% 0% 40% 40% 10% 3.5 0.9


18 0% 0% 20% 50% 30% 4.2 0.7


18 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 4.5 0.5



18 0% 10% 0% 30% 60% 4.5 0.8


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will aplly to sources of laboratory/researchfunding identified during this program

17 0% 10% 20% 40% 40% 4.1 0.9

I indend to apply for NIH funding 16 0% 0% 30% 20% 40% 4.1 0.9

I intend to apply for NSF funding available tome

15 0% 10% 30% 30% 30% 3.7 1.0

I will apply for an internal UC grant 16 0% 0% 20% 40% 40% 4.2 0.8

I will use the information I learn about ex-ternal grant review when I apply for my nextgrant

15 0% 0% 10% 30% 60% 4.5 0.7

I will integrate my knowledge of direct: in-direct cost when preparing my next internalgrant

16 10% 0% 10% 40% 40% 4.1 1.1


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I can identify sources of laboratory/researchfunding

17 0% 0% 10% 60% 30% 4.2 0.6

I am aware of different types of NIH funding 16 0% 0% 20% 50% 30% 4.1 0.7

I know about the types of NSF funding avail-able to me

17 0% 0% 40% 40% 20% 3.9 0.8

I understand the internal UC grant review pro-cess

16 0% 0% 30% 50% 20% 3.9 0.7

I understand the external review process ofgrants

16 0% 0% 30% 50% 20% 3.9 0.7

I comprehend the concept of direct: indirectconst

16 10% 0% 30% 40% 20% 3.8 1.1


9

Ready Set Go: Time ManagementFebruary 14, 2013




RSG–Time Management








Res

pons

es

1

2

3

4

5

6

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

0

3

0

3

2

0 0

2

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 3

Educator 0



Full Professor 0


Other 2

Total Responses 10


1



espo

nses

2

4

6

8

10

12

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

2

01

0

9

1

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 2





Other 1

Total Responses 10


2



program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

10

12

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

9

0 01

0 0

Response Count

Immediately 9


Next semester 0


I don’t know 0

Never 0

Total Responses 10


3




• Some tips on how to improve upon my ability to prioritize

• Training on management

• Leadership skills

• Recognizing this is a problem for me

• How to say “no”

• How to customize deadlines

• That honing in on these basic skills is foundational for success

• Personal professional development

• Skills to optimize time

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




9 0% 0% 30% 40% 20% 3.9 0.8


8 0% 0% 40% 50% 10% 3.8 0.7



9 0% 0% 10% 40% 40% 4.3 0.7


9 0% 0% 0% 70% 30% 4.3 0.5


9 0% 20% 30% 20% 20% 3.4 1.1


9 0% 0% 0% 70% 30% 4.3 0.5


9 0% 0% 10% 40% 40% 4.3 0.7



9 0% 0% 10% 30% 60% 4.4 0.7


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I can establish a time management plan 9 0% 0% 0% 90% 10% 4.1 0.3

I am able to set priorties. 9 0% 0% 0% 70% 30% 4.3 0.5

I have skills to successfully multi-task 9 0% 0% 0% 80% 20% 4.2 0.4

I can balance my work and family/life 8 0% 0% 50% 40% 10% 3.6 0.7

I know about methods of effective delegation. 8 0% 0% 40% 40% 20% 3.9 0.8

I can determine when and how to say no 8 0% 0% 20% 50% 20% 4.0 0.8


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will establish a time management plan 8 0% 0% 10% 60% 20% 4.1 0.6

I plan to use the material presented today toset priorities

8 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 4.5 0.5

I will use the skills presented during this work-shop to successfully multi-task

8 0% 0% 10% 50% 40% 4.2 0.7

I intend to balance my work and family/life us-ing strategies presented during today’s work-shop.

8 0% 0% 10% 60% 20% 4.1 0.6

I will use methods of effective delegation. 8 0% 0% 20% 60% 10% 3.9 0.6

I will use the information presented today todetermine when and how to say no.

8 0% 0% 10% 50% 40% 4.2 0.7


9

Ready Set Go:

Planning for Career AdvancementMarch 14, 2013




RSG: Planning for Career Advancement






assessment.


Res

pons

es

2

4

6

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

0 0 0

4 4

0 0

2

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 0

Educator 0



Full Professor 0


Other 2

Total Responses 10


1



espo

nses

2

4

6

8

10

12

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

2

01

0

9

0

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 2





Other 0

Total Responses 10


2



program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

4

1

0

3

2

0

Response Count

Immediately 4


Next semester 0


I don’t know 2

Never 0

Total Responses 10


3




• How to plan for career advancement

• Organization for advancement

• Tracks or opportunities for advancement

• Mentor ideas for advancement

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




10 0% 0% 0% 10% 90% 4.9 0.3


10 0% 0% 10% 10% 80% 4.7 0.7



10 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% 4.8 0.4


10 0% 10% 10% 10% 70% 4.4 1.1


10 0% 0% 10% 20% 70% 4.6 0.7


10 0% 10% 10% 0% 80% 4.5 1.1


10 0% 0% 10% 10% 80% 4.7 0.7



10 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% 4.8 0.4


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I can differentiate the unique functions of theunits within the medical campus.

8 0% 10% 10% 40% 40% 4.0 1.1

I understand the organization within each ofthe units within the medical campus

8 0% 10% 10% 20% 50% 4.1 1.1

I can build relationships with critical personel. 8 0% 0% 10% 40% 50% 4.4 0.7

I know about the faculty governing bod-ies/committees of UC

9 0% 0% 10% 40% 40% 4.3 0.7

I am able to distinguish the milestones neces-sary at teach level of career advancement

8 0% 0% 0% 40% 60% 4.6 0.5

I can develop a plan to reach the necessaymilestones for acareer development.

9 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% 4.7 0.5

I know the roles of the PI in the conduct ofethical research at UC

8 0% 0% 0% 10% 90% 4.9 0.4

I know the roles of the PI in grant manage-ment at UC.

8 0% 10% 0% 20% 60% 4.4 1.1


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will use the material from today’s workshopto differentiate the unique functions of theunits within the medical campus

9 0% 0% 20% 10% 70% 4.4 0.9

I will drawn upon my new understanding ofthe organization within each of these units.

8 0% 0% 20% 10% 60% 4.4 0.9

I intend to build relationships with criticalpersonnel.

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 5.0 0.0

I will use the strategies presented to-day to identify the faculty governing bod-ies/committees of UC

8 0% 0% 20% 10% 60% 4.4 0.9

I plan to distinguish the milestones necessaryat each level of my career advancement.

8 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% 4.8 0.5

I will develop a plan to reach the necessarymilestones for career development

8 0% 0% 0% 10% 90% 4.9 0.4

I will use the information from today’s work-shop to conduct of ethical research at UC

9 0% 0% 10% 0% 90% 4.8 0.7

I will use the strategies from today’s workshopto manage my grants.

8 0% 0% 20% 10% 60% 4.4 0.9


9

Ready Set Go:

Mentoring & Career GuidanceApril 11, 2013




RSG–Mentoring & Career Guidance






assessment.


Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

0

2

0

2

1

0 0

6

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 2

Educator 0



Full Professor 0


Other 6

Total Responses 11


1



espo

nses

2

4

6

8

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

3 3

1

3

5

4

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 3





Other 4

Total Responses 11


2



program?

Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

10

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

7

10

12

0

Response Count

Immediately 7


Next semester 0


I don’t know 2

Never 0

Total Responses 11


3




• Understand the need for mentoring development

• Value of standard internal standards for mentoring

• Clear communication of expectations between mentors and mentees

• How to structure the communication process in mentoring relationship

• Periodically review the progress with the mentee

• Specific aspects of a good mentor-mentee relationship

• Mentor roles and responsibilities

• Mentee roles and responsibilities

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




11 0% 20% 0% 50% 40% 4.0 1.1


11 0% 20% 10% 20% 50% 4.1 1.2



11 0% 20% 0% 10% 70% 4.4 1.2


10 0% 20% 0% 30% 50% 4.1 1.2


11 0% 10% 0% 30% 60% 4.5 0.9


11 0% 20% 10% 20% 50% 4.1 1.2


10 0% 20% 0% 20% 60% 4.2 1.2



11 0% 10% 10% 40% 50% 4.2 1.0


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I can describe the relationship between menteeand mentor

11 0% 0% 10% 30% 60% 4.5 0.7

I understand the expectations of a mentoringrelationship

11 0% 0% 20% 30% 50% 4.4 0.8

I know the responsibilities of individuals en-gaged in a mentoring relationship

11 0% 10% 10% 30% 50% 4.3 1.0

I recognize potential missteps in the mentoringprocess

11 0% 10% 10% 40% 50% 4.2 1.0

I know strategies to avoid potential misstepsin a mentoring relationship

11 0% 10% 20% 40% 40% 4.0 1.0

I know about multiple sources where I can re-ceive career guidance

11 0% 20% 40% 30% 20% 3.5 1.0

I recognize when it is appropriate to becomea mentor

11 0% 10% 30% 40% 30% 3.8 1.0


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will modify my approach to mentoring re-lationships as a result of definitions providedduring this workshop

10 0% 0% 30% 50% 20% 3.9 0.7

I will integrate the mentor/mentee responsi-bilities identified during this workshop into mymentoring relationship

10 0% 0% 20% 50% 30% 4.1 0.7

I intend to use the material from this work-shop to avoid potential missteps in my men-toring relationship

10 0% 0% 20% 40% 40% 4.2 0.8

I will draw upon multiple sources for careerguidance

10 0% 0% 30% 50% 20% 3.9 0.7

When the time is right, I will become a mentor 10 0% 0% 20% 40% 30% 4.1 0.8


9

Ready Set Go: The Paper TrailMay 9, 2013




RSG: Paper Trail, Spring 2013








Res

pons

es

2

4

6

8

10

12

Gradu

ate

Assist

ant

Adjunc

t Fac

ulty

Educa

tor

Assist

ant P

rofes

sor

Assoc

iate

Profes

sor

Full P

rofes

sor

Profes

sor E

mer

itus

Other

01

2

9

3

0 0

4

Rank Count


Adjunct Faculty 1

Educator 2



Full Professor 0


Other 4

Total Responses 19


1



espo

nses

5

10

15

Teac

hing

Assm

't

Teac

hing

Quand

ry

Resea

rch

Inte

rest

Pedag

ogica

l Inte

rest

Collea

gue

Sugge

stion

Inte

rdisc

. Con

vers

ation

s

Caree

r Dev

elopm

ent

Other

0 0

13

21

2

15

0

Response Count


Teaching Quandry 0

Research Interest 13





Other 0

Total Responses 19


2



program?

Res

pons

es

5

10

15

Imm

ediat

ely

With

in th

e cu

rrent

sem

este

r

Next s

emes

ter

The n

ext t

ime

it is r

eleva

nt

I don

't kno

wNev

er

14

3

01 1

0

Response Count

Immediately 14


Next semester 0


I don’t know 1

Never 0

Total Responses 19


3




• How to write a paper

• When to write a paper

• How to structure a paper

• To look at the college guidelines on authorship

• More concrete understanding of the process for writing and submitting papers

• How to submit a paper

• The importance of the letter to the editor

• Reading author’s guidelines

• How to handle rejection

• Where to submit a manuscript

•

Other comments by program participants. . .

• “This presenter was very effective and his style was very pleasant and helpful”

• “Great talk–learned a lot!”

4



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disgree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Mean

Score

Std

.Deviation*




19 0% 10% 0% 40% 60% 4.5 0.8


19 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% 4.7 0.5



19 0% 10% 10% 30% 60% 4.5 0.8


19 0% 10% 0% 40% 50% 4.4 0.8


19 0% 20% 30% 30% 30% 3.7 1.1


19 0% 10% 0% 40% 50% 4.4 0.8


19 0% 10% 10% 40% 50% 4.3 0.9



19 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% 4.7 0.5


7




Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I know when to write a paper 17 0% 0% 0% 60% 40% 4.4 0.5

I know who should be included as a co-author 17 0% 0% 10% 30% 60% 4.5 0.7

I can identify where to submit my articles be-cause I understand the journals in my field

17 0% 0% 10% 60% 40% 4.3 0.6

I recognize the importance of incorporatingnegative results into my paper

17 0% 0% 10% 50% 40% 4.4 0.6

I can devise strategies for dealing with the re-jection of a manuscript

17 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 4.5 0.5

I can evaluate when to serve as a reviewer 17 0% 0% 10% 70% 20% 4.2 0.5

I know how to use my experience as a reviewerto better my own research writing

17 0% 0% 10% 50% 50% 4.4 0.6

I understand what editors will look for whenevaluating my manuscript

17 0% 0% 0% 60% 40% 4.4 0.5


8



Question Tota

lResp

onses

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Avera

geScore

Std

.Deviation*

I will use the strategies presented today to de-cide when it is best to write a paper

16 0% 0% 0% 60% 40% 4.4 0.5

I will use the information from this workshopto appropriately identify co-authors

16 0% 0% 10% 40% 50% 4.4 0.6

I will identify where to submit my articles be-cause I understand the journals in my field

16 0% 0% 10% 40% 40% 4.3 0.7

I intend to appropriately incorporate negativeresults into my papers

15 0% 0% 0% 60% 40% 4.4 0.5

I will use the strategies presented today whenresubmitting a manuscript

15 0% 0% 0% 40% 60% 4.6 0.5

I will use today’s workshop to evaluate whento serve as a reviewer

16 0% 0% 10% 50% 40% 4.4 0.6

I intend to use my experience as a reviewer tobetter my own research writing

16 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 4.5 0.5

I will evaluate my manuscript using the tech-niques presented today

16 0% 0% 10% 40% 50% 4.4 0.6


9


Meeting Room


Presentationby Dr. Holland


1 / 10

Ready, Set, Go!: Hiring, Effective Interviewing, Evaluation

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

0.00%0

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

100.00%2

0.00%0

2




Overall Event

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room


2 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

100.00%2

0.00%0

2

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

0.00%0

0.00%0

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

100.00%2

0.00%0

2

Presentation by Dr. Holland




Overall Event

3 / 10







4 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

100.00%2

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

2

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%1

50.00%1

2


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10


Q3 What ideas do you have about how tomake future Ready, Set, Go! events more


# Responses Date


6 / 10




# Responses Date


7 / 10



# Responses Date


8 / 10




# Responses Date


9 / 10


0.00% 0

100.00% 2

Q7 Have you participated in other Ready,Set, Go! workshops?


Total 2

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10



Meeting Room


Presentationby Speaker(s)


1 / 10

Ready, Set, Go!: Setting the Tone of Your Lab & Dealing with Conflict

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

70.00%7

30.00%3

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%5

50.00%5

10




Overall Event

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room


2 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%2

80.00%8

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

11.11%1

55.56%5

33.33%3

9

0.00%0

30.00%3

20.00%2

50.00%5

0.00%0

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%5

50.00%5

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%5

50.00%5

10

Presentation by Speaker(s)




Overall Event

3 / 10







4 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

60.00%6

40.00%4

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

40.00%4

60.00%6

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%5

50.00%5

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

50.00%5

50.00%5

10

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

40.00%4

60.00%6

10


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10


Q3 What ideas do you have about how tomake future Ready, Set, Go! events more


# Responses Date

1 Ice breaker where people introduce themselves, field, and career stage 11/14/2014 10:36 AM

2 this was very interactive 11/14/2014 10:35 AM

3 time management, more ones on mediation 11/14/2014 10:31 AM

4 Small group session more case scenarios of conflict 11/14/2014 10:30 AM

5 More small breakout sessions 11/14/2014 10:29 AM

6 Group breakouts 11/14/2014 10:27 AM

7 Have new and more senior faculty to discuss problem on how to start 11/14/2014 10:26 AM

6 / 10




# Responses Date

1 good job so far 11/14/2014 10:35 AM

2 contact names 11/14/2014 10:32 AM

3 introduce the LEAF program members & annual workshops? 11/14/2014 10:31 AM

4 Focus group meeting 11/14/2014 10:29 AM

7 / 10



# Responses Date

1 6 components of successful lab conflict management as an opportunity 11/14/2014 10:36 AM

2 lab building and development ideas 11/14/2014 10:34 AM

3 Discussion from audience 11/14/2014 10:32 AM

4 resolving conflict, thinking about my lab as a brand 11/14/2014 10:30 AM

5 slide handouts and go to place 11/14/2014 10:29 AM

6 Sample questionnaires 11/14/2014 10:27 AM

8 / 10




# Responses Date

1 Some of the sample scenarios became redundant 11/14/2014 10:27 AM

9 / 10


28.57% 2

71.43% 5

Q7 Have you participated in other Ready,Set, Go! workshops?


Total 7

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10



Meeting Room

Facilities -Food


FeaturedPresentation...

1 / 10

Accountability & Advocacy Council Allies Training




Overall Event

2 / 10


0.00%0

7.69%1

46.15%6

38.46%5

7.69%1

13

0.00%0

7.69%1

53.85%7

30.77%4

7.69%1

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

23.08%3

46.15%6

30.77%4

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

7.69%1

15.38%2

76.92%10

13

0.00%0

7.69%1

7.69%1

23.08%3

61.54%8

13

0.00%0

23.08%3

23.08%3

53.85%7

0.00%0

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

15.38%2

46.15%6

38.46%5

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

7.69%1

38.46%5

53.85%7

13


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room

Facilities - Food


Featured Presentation by Speaker




Overall Event

3 / 10







4 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

61.54%8

38.46%5

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

38.46%5

61.54%8

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

38.46%5

61.54%8

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

46.15%6

53.85%7

13

0.00%0

0.00%0

7.69%1

38.46%5

53.85%7

13


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10




# Responses Date

1 A bit more role playing - discussing situations 10/7/2014 11:25 AM

2 Just need more time 10/7/2014 11:21 AM

6 / 10




# Responses Date

1 Continuing to enlarge resource list and making it available will be very helpful 10/7/2014 11:30 AM

2 Univ of Michigan has babysitting service that goes to faculty houses if their kids are sick so they can teachclasses

10/7/2014 11:29 AM

3 More networking / interactive opportunities with junior faculty 10/7/2014 11:28 AM

7 / 10



# Responses Date

1 Reminding of good listening practice, role playing, hearing variety of approaches 10/7/2014 11:28 AM

2 Role playing dialogues 10/7/2014 11:26 AM

3 Tools for responding - Establishing role active listening 10/7/2014 11:25 AM

4 Tools for conversation 10/7/2014 11:21 AM

5 Examples of what to say 10/7/2014 11:19 AM

8 / 10




# Responses Date

1 I think more role playing would have been useful 10/7/2014 11:27 AM

9 / 10


58.33% 7

41.67% 5



Total 12

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10



Meeting Room

Facilities -Food


FeaturedPresentation...

1 / 10

Allies Training - Medical Campus




Overall Event

2 / 10


0.00%0

13.33%2

13.33%2

26.67%4

46.67%7

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

40.00%6

33.33%5

26.67%4

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%3

40.00%6

40.00%6

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.67%1

46.67%7

46.67%7

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

26.67%4

26.67%4

46.67%7

15

0.00%0

13.33%2

26.67%4

46.67%7

13.33%2

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%3

53.33%8

26.67%4

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

20.00%3

53.33%8

26.67%4

15


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Meeting Room

Facilities - Food


Featured Presentation by Speaker




Overall Event

3 / 10







4 / 10


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

66.67%10

33.33%5

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

60.00%9

40.00%6

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

66.67%10

33.33%5

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.67%1

60.00%9

33.33%5

15

0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

66.67%10

33.33%5

15


Strongly agree


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Stronglydisagree


Agree Stronglyagree

Total






5 / 10




# Responses Date

1 Cut off people who talk too much. Many people did not talk. Some concepts were not addressed at length -academic misconduct boundaries.

11/18/2014 11:41 AM

2 More workshops + interactive sessions 11/18/2014 11:32 AM

3 Please expand on similar workshops - especially RPT and faculty development. 11/18/2014 11:31 AM

4 Incorporate small group work - incorporate TEAMS 11/18/2014 11:24 AM

5 Perhaps you tried to cover too much in one one and a half hour session? 11/18/2014 11:23 AM

6 More time for discussion and developing proactive methods for supporting each other 11/18/2014 11:14 AM

7 Other leadership groups should attend 11/18/2014 11:13 AM

6 / 10




# Responses Date

1 Retention support groups 11/18/2014 11:41 AM

2 listen and document actions 11/18/2014 11:32 AM

3 Role models are very important (notice them) 11/18/2014 11:31 AM

4 Make sure that faculty (and trainees) know about the LEAF Ally program 11/18/2014 11:30 AM

5 International students + faculty 11/18/2014 11:28 AM

6 Setting up mentors with Ally for new faculty 11/18/2014 11:25 AM

7 Include women in Medicine! Add another M in STEM!! 11/18/2014 11:24 AM

8 Karen, your URL list of helpful sites is important 11/18/2014 11:23 AM

9 Women and men in the clinical sciences need to be included PLEASE INCLUDE WOMEN AND MEN IN THECLINICAL SCIENCES.

11/18/2014 11:14 AM

10 There needs to be a direct path to diversity assistance and required for new faculty 11/18/2014 11:13 AM

7 / 10



# Responses Date

1 Tips + Questions 11/18/2014 11:41 AM

2 It was all useful and it will be very helpful to have the resources online to go over and refer to. 11/18/2014 11:34 AM

3 Debbie did an excellent job 11/18/2014 11:32 AM

4 The steps to follow during "a problem issue" 11/18/2014 11:31 AM

5 Discussions about how to communicate effectively - tools to use 11/18/2014 11:30 AM

6 It was practical and insightful 11/18/2014 11:28 AM

7 Debie Pearce's role playing examples 11/18/2014 11:23 AM

8 Featured speaker 11/18/2014 11:23 AM

9 It was all useful and it will be very helpful to have the resources online to refer to. 11/18/2014 11:15 AM

10 The discussion at the end personalized the context of the presentation. 11/18/2014 11:14 AM

11 coaching and feedback 11/18/2014 11:13 AM

8 / 10




# Responses Date

1 Too many personal vignettes that bordered on self-aggrandizement. 11/18/2014 11:41 AM

2 UC Resources 11/18/2014 11:32 AM

3 none perceived 11/18/2014 11:28 AM

4 Some of Debbie's presentation overlapped her work to the WILD program 11/18/2014 11:23 AM

5 I'm an introvert - not a fan of role play. 11/18/2014 11:14 AM

9 / 10


36.36% 4

63.64% 7



Total 11

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

10 / 10


uc leaf flash evaluations › content › dam › uc › orgs › ucleaf › docs › thirdy… ·...

Documents