. --' ; .... i ~ ~, j j ; ,) ; ... ~ . ,\ ~ .... ;: ; !. j; 1 ; ;.... f j ~ .... ; RE"'Q" U'I'R' 'E"ME"'NT" (j'U'I"I[)' E' 'LI'N'E' : . .: ... ,.; _

RIEQUlREMENT GU'IIDIEll'N'IE' ." .. ' ... ~," ,J j ; J,', j i;': .: i .J : J: !r',i, j, I'~; AND TRAINING PROCEDURE OF SPFM

CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

LEI Guidelines Series 99-10

LEI GUIDELINE 99-11

LEI GUIDELINE 99-12

LEI GUIDELINE 99-13

LEI GUIDELINE 99-14

LEI GUIDELINE 99-15

@ THE INDONESIAN 'ECOLABELLlNG INSTITUTE (LEI)

REQtJl:REMENT G.UI:DELI·NE ANI) TRAINING. PROCEDURE OF SPFM

C.:ERTIFICATtON PROGRAM .. -,- ..• •. • .•• j'. • • ,.. • •. ::.. •

JI. T am an Malabar No. 18. Bogor 16151

Tel. (62)-(251) 340744,745,759 Fax. (62)-(251) 321739

E-mail: lei@lei.or.id. Website : http://www.lei.or.id

©2000 by The Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute

Prepared by: The Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute

Expert Team: LEI In-house Experts

Editor: Asep S. Suntana Daru Asycarya

Yudi Iskandarsyah Paramita Iswari

English Version: Gloria C. Kismadi Yudi Iskandarsyah

Administration: Soleh Suaidi

Published by : The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute (LEI)

This publication was prepared for a dissemination of Certification System for Sustainable Production Forest Management . to concerned parties.

Numbering System of The Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute Forest Certification System Documents

Letter No. : 29/LEI/SPS/VII/99

Each LEI's document will follow the numbering/coding system as follows: I. Document Type and Status

Document types and status for every LEI standards and guidelines is written at the left-upper of its cover, as drawn below:

1.1.

1.2.

LEI Guideline 99-02 DOCUMENT TITLE

Type of Document a. Proposal Draft b. Amendment Draft Status of Document

a. LEI-I b. LEI-II

c. LEI-III d. LEI-IV

e. LEI-V

f. Final Document

Type of Document Amendment Draft Status of Dokument LEI-II

[ Document No. LEI-11/99-02/2 Date June 18, 1999

is a new proposal document to the document of certification system is a revised document that has been determined as LEI Guideline

Document of proposal/amendment draft Document of proposal/amendment draft resulted from the first workshop and/or from consultation process with stakeholders Document of proposal/amendment draft resulted from Team Work established by LEI Document of proposal/amendment draft resulted from the second workshop and/or from consultation process with stakeholders Document of final proposal/amendment draft proposed by LEI to be approved by stakeholders. Document tliat has been approved by YLEI Board of Trustees

1.3. Number of Document Document number is related to the document types and status. Document No. LEI-II/99-02/2 - for example - indicate that: a. The document is published from the result of workshop b. It has a serial number of 88-02 c. It is a second draft judging from the status of document

1.4. Date of Document Describing when the document is made

~ ......

11. Document Title Document title follows LEI numbering system. Example: • LEI Guideline 89-01 : General Requirements for SPFM Certification Body

Ill. Numbering System

A. LEI Standard Document LEI Documentation System

I. LEI Standard 5000 Framework for Sustainable Production Forest Management System LEI Standard 5000-1 Sustainable Natural Production,Forest Management System LEI Standard 5000-2 Sustainable Plantation Forest Management System LEI Standard 5000-3 Sustainable Community-based Forest Management System LEI Standard 5000-4 Sustainable Non-Timber Forest Product Management System

2. LEI Standard 5001 Timber Tracking System 3. . LEI Standard 5002 Forest Product Labeling 4. LEI Standard 5005 Terms and Definiiions related to Forest Certification ----

LEI Guideline LEI Documentation S LEI Guideline 55 Resolution Guideline to Appeal against the Certification Decision

C. LEI Guideline LEI Documentation System

1. LEI Guideline 88 Timber Tracking Certification System

2. LEI Guideline series 88-00 Requirement Guideline and Work Procedure for Timber Tracking

LEI Guideline 88-01 General Requirements for Timber Tracking Certification Body LEI Guideline 88-02 General Requirements for Timber Tracking Certification Field Assessor LEI Guideline 88-03 General Requirements for Timber T racking Certification Expert Panel

3. LEI Guideline series 88-10 Requirement Guideline and Training Procedure of Timb~r Tl:ilCking Certification Program

LEI Guideline 88-11 Training Guideline for Timber Tracking Certification Field Assessor LEI Guideline 88-12 Training Guideline for Timber Tracking Certification Expert Panel LEI Guideline 88-13 Training Guideline for Timber Tracking Certification Trainer LEI Guideline 88-14 General Requirements For Ecolabelling Certification Training Body LEI Guideline 88-15 General Requirements For Ecolabelling Certification Personnel Registration Body

4 LEI Guideline series 88-20 . Guideline for Timber Tracking Certification Program LEI Guideline 88-21 Guideline for Field Assessment on Timber Tracking Certification LEI Guideline 88-22 Guideline for Report-writing Field Assessment on Timber Tracking Certification LEI Guideline 88-23 Guideline for Screening Process on Timber Tracking Certification LEI Guideline 88-24 Guideline for Decision-making on Timber Tracking Certification LEI Guideline 88-25 Guideline for Drawing-Up Recommendations on Timber Tracking Certification

LEI Guideline 88-26 Guideline for Surveillance tmplementation and Certificate Extension on Timber Tracking Certification

D. LEI Guideline LEI Documentation System

1. LEI Guideline 99 Sustainable Production Forest Management (SFPM) Certification System

2. LEI Guideline series 99-00 Requirement Guideline and Work Procedure for SPFM LEI Guideline 99-01 General Requirements for SPFM Certification Body

LEI Guideline 99-02 General Requirements for SPFM Certification Field Assessor

LEIGuideline 99-03 General Requirements for SPFM Certification Expert Panel

3. LEI Guideline series 99-10 Requirement Guideline and Training Procedure of SPFM Certification Program

LEI Guideline 99-11 Training Guideline for SPFM Certification Field Assessor

LEI Guideline 99-12 Training Guideline for SPFM Certification Expert Panel

LEI Guideline 99-13 Training Guideline for SPFM Certification Trainer

LEI Guideline 99-14 General Criteria for SPFM Certification Training Institution

LEI Guideline 99-15 General Criteria for SPFM Certitication Personnel Training Institution

4 LEI Guideline series 99-20 Guideline for Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management (SNPFM) Certification Program .'

LEI Guideline 99-21 Guideline for Field Assessment on SNPFM Certification

LEI Guideline 99-22 Guideline for Report-writing Field Assessment on SNPFM Certification i

LEI Guideline 99-23 Guideline for the Screening Process in the SNPFM Certification

LEI Guideline 99-24 Guideline for Decision·making on SNPFM Certification , LEI Guideline 99-25 Guideline for Drawing-Up Recommendations on SNPFM Certification

LEI Guideline 99-26 Guideline for Surveillance Implementation and Certificate Extension on SNPFM Certification

5 LEI Guideline series 99-30 Guideline for Sustainable Plantation Forest Certification 6 LEI Guideline series 99-40 Guideline for Community-based Forest Management

E. LEI Technical Document LEI Documentation System

Technical Document LEI-01 Verifier and Verification Toolbox for Assessment Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Manaqement (SNPFM) System

Technical Document LEI-02 Indicators of Intensity Scale for Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management . ----

ii

F. LEI Academic Document

Academic Document LEt-01 Academic Document for Certification System of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management

IV. Memorandum

Note:

1. All parties who have reasons to quote all or some of this document, should acknowledge the document status, type, and number clearly, and should inform LEI secretariat.

2. The use of every LEI Standard, Guideline, Technical and Academic Document in the implementation of SPFM Certification should be done thoroughly. LEI is not responsible for the inaccurately use of LEI Standards and Guidelines.

Documents in which the titles are in italic form shows that such documents are still in the development process.

iii

Sustainable Production Forest Management (SPFM) Certification System

JI. Taman Malabar No. 18. Bogor16151

Tel. (62)-(251) 340 744,745,759 Fax. (62)-(251) 321739

E-mail: lei@lei.or.id. Website : http://www.lei.or.id

©2000 by The Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute

Prepared by: The Indonesian Ecolabeling Institute

Expert Team: LElln-house Experts

Editor: Asep S. Suntana Daru Asycarya

Yudi Iskandarsyah Paramita Iswari

English Version: Gloria C. Kismadi Yudi Iskandarsyah

Administration: Soleh Suaidi

Published by : The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute (LEI)

This publication was prepared for a dissemination of Certification System for Sustainable Production Forest Management to concerned parties.

Publications are available in two versions, in Indonesian and English.

111

GRATITUDES

With a kind help and supports from various concerned parties to the development of certification system for an upright and sustainable natural resources management, this publication was completed. We would like to acknowledge the advice and other inputs of the development of Training system for achieving Sustainable· Foret management: Ir. Boedijono (Center for Standardization and Environment, Ministry of Forestry), Ir. Bambang Uripno, MEd (Pusdiklat Pegawai Dephutbun), Ir. Samsudi, MEd (Pusdiklat Pegawai dan SDM Kehutanan), Ir Jalal, Ir Jamartin Sihite, Ir. Nawa Irianto, Ir Ferdinandus Agung, Ir Ahmad, Ir. Zaenal Arifin, Ir. Agung Nugraha, Ir Sunardi, Or. Agus Setyarso, Ir. Didik Suhardjito, Ir. Lis Wibisono (BSN), Ir. M. Noor Efansyah, Drs. Noor Fauzi, and Drs. Rifki Mochtar.

We would like to take this opportunity to delive'r our gratitude for the support and cooperation provided in the development of certification system for natural production forest management and its training system to : Ecolabel Working Group (1994 -1998): Emil Salim, Agus Purnomo (Pelangi), Loekito Darjadi (Departemen Kehutanan), Zaim Saidi (YLKI), Asep S. Suntana, Mia Siscawati (RMI), Tri Nugroho, Suporahardjo (LATIN), Riga Adiwoso (UI), Mubariq Ahmad (NRM), Daniel Abimanju Carnadie, Upik W. Djalins; Leaders and

. Members of Criteria and Indicator Working Team : Ishemat Soerianegara ,(RIP) of Bogor Agricultural University for production aspect, Effendi Sumardja of Ministry of Environment (ecological a?pect), Riga Adiwoso Suprapto of Magister Management University of Indonesia (social aspect), also to Koesnadi Hardjasoemantri and Wimar Witoelar for giving their valuable inputs in developing the institutional aspects of LEI foundation (YLEI); LEI In-hous.e Experts: Hariadi Kartodihardjo, M. Buce Saleh, Haryanto R. Putro, R. Yando Zakaria; and to Iwan Jaya'" Azis, Raksaka Mahi, Kirti Peniwati, and Ngadiono for their efforts in developing decision making system using Analytic ~ierarchy Process (AHP), and to Alan Purbawiyatna who designed standard procedures for certification implementation.

We also would like to convey·our gratitude to : Mr. Djamaluddin Surjohadikusumo (Ex-Minister of Forestry) for his courage and support in the development of forest certification system in Indonesia, and to forestry officers (echelon I and 11) in the Ministry, Untung Iskandar, M. Ratu Asyhari (Foreign Affairs of Ministry of Forestry), Boedijono, Tri Joko Mulyono (Center for Standardization and Environment, Ministry of Forestry) and also to others in the Ministry that we can not mention individually. To our colleagues from National Standardization Body (NSB) i.e. Herudi Kartowisastro dan Lies Wibisono, our thanks also goes to them. People from NGO(s): Abdon Nababan (Telapak), ·Indro Tjahjono (SKEPHI), Wibowo A. Djatmiko (LATIN), Jim Jarvie (TNC), Niel Makinuddin (PLASMA), Noer Fauzi (KPA), Ruwindrijanto (Telapak), Hira Jhamtani (Konphalindo). Colleagues from Walhi : Zukri Saad, Suraya Hafif, Emmy Hafild, Lili Hasanuddin, and Muayat AIi Muhsy. gave many

. inspiration to us, thank you. We would like to extend our thanks to private sectors associated in APHI (Indonesian Concession Holders Association), as well as individual from companies; Nana Suparna, Jeffri Sirait, Agung Nugraha, APHI Expert Team Member: Achmad Soemitro, Zachrial Coto, Syafii Manan, AA Malik, Soeyitno Soerdiman, Herujono Hadisoeparto, Amri Marzali, Darni Soebari, Anwar Umar, dan Daniel Leuhery. As well to the Certifiers: PT. Sucofindo (Haris WitjaksonoJriyan Aidilfitri); PT. Mutu Agung Lestari (Hermawan, Arifin Lambaga, Victor Antonio Amir, Taufik Margani); LATIN (Dwi Rakhmat Muhtaman, Aisyah Sileuw). And to experts from Academics and Research Centers : Endang Suhendang, Didik Suhardjito, Sanusi Wiradinata [RIP], Bahruni, Sudaryanto, Soemarjono Soedargo [RIP], Nyoto Santoso, Elias, A. Mahmud Thohari, Teddy Rusolono, Togu Manurung, Wiratno, Yanto Santosa (IPB); Agus Setyarso, Sofyan P. Warsito, Hasanu Simon, P.M. Laksono (UGM); M. Soerjani, Seiniarto Aji Purwanto, Yunita T. Winarno (UI); MA Sarjono, Soeyitno Sudirman (UNMUL); Purnadjaja [RIP] (CIFOR). Assesors : Jamartin Sihite, Daru Asycarya, Marolop Sianipar, Nawa Irianto, Sunardi, Ahmad, Jalal, Zaenal, Ferdinandus Agung PMW, Lukman Mulyanto, etc.

Our special thanks also goes to Duncan Poore (IISD). Timothy Synnott (Executive Director of Forest Stewardship Council/FSC), T. Mok (FSC Board Member), Kishokumar Jeyaraj (FSC Consultant), and FSC-accredited certifiers: Richard Donovan, Steve Gretzinger, Abraham Guillen, and Jeff Hayward from Smartwood, Ruth Nussbaum and Bill Maynard from SGS Qualifor who have been working with Ecolabell Working Group since 1994 in discussions regarding certification system in Indonesia. Our thank you goes to our colleagues from WWF International such as Chris Elliot, Pierre Hausselman. To Alexander Hienrich, Hans

IV

Beukeboom and Barbara von Kruedener from GTZ. Datuk Freezailah, Amha bin Buang and Efransyah from ITTO.

We appreciate all consulting firms and forest concessionaires who expressed their willingness as well as participation in the implementation of field tests for certification system of sustainable natural product forest management: a) Consulting Firms : PT. Access Centrakarya, PT. Adhimulia Purnaservindo, PT. Forindo

Bangunkonsultan, PT. Ekokon Nusantara, PT. Mutuagung'Lestari, PT. Pronatres Development, PT. Reka Paramitra Konsultan, PT. Sarbi Moerhani Lestari, PT. Setyamitra Bhaktipersada, PT. Sucofindo, PT. Tanindo, PT. Wanabhakti Persadajaya.

b) Forest Management Units: PT. Cipta Rimba Jaya, PT. Gruti, PT. Kiani Lestari, PT. Kulim Company, PT. Melapi Timber, PT. Minas Pagai, PT. Mujur Timber, PT. ITCI, PT. Inhutani I, PT. Inhutani 11,

c) Member of Expert Panel I for Second Field Test of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management (SNPFM) Certification System: Sanusi Wiradinata, MS (RIP), H. Nurman Tasman, R. Yando Zakaria: Nyoto Santoso, Buce Saleh: Mangasa B. Manik Radja (RIP): Yosefa Sayekti, and Rosmie Saleh.

d) Member of Expert Panel II and Team Member of Second SNFPM Certification System Field Test: Eka Pria Anas, Gunarwan Soeratmo, Lumisu Mangiwa, Kus Darmodjo, Aulia LP. Aruan, Kdmara Djaja; Deddy Herdiansyah; 'Arimbi Heroepoetri; Anna Indria Witasari; Suranto; Ayub Pairunan; Endang Suhendang; Yanto Santosa, Raksaka Mahi; Ngadiono.

e) Evaluation Team for Second SNPFM Certification System Field Test: Budhi Sugarda; Hiras Sidabutar; Toga Silitonga; Loekito Darjadi; Rudy C. Tarumingkeng; Herman Prayudi; Teddy Pawitra; Chris A. Bennett; Effendi A. Sumardja; Iwan Tjitradjaja; Indroyono Susilo; Soemarso SR; Agus Purnomo; Ahmad D. Habir ".

n Forest Management Unit PT. Hutan Mulya (Dwima Group) where the revised certification system field test was conducted.

g) Expert Panel I and II for Field Test of Revised Certification System for SNPFM: Didiek Suharjito, Soedarjanto, M: Ratu Asyhari:

h) Assesors for field assesment on the Field Test for Revised Certification System on SNP FM: Nawa Irianto, Wuri, Ahmad, Jamartin Sihite, Sunardi, Jalal.

Finally, we also would like to extend our gratitude to our colleagues at the Executive Board of LEI who have been very active to directly or indirectly involve in the development of certification system and therefore, make this publication possible, as well to all parties we could not name of and also to field officers of forest management units who involved in the field tests as the counterparts to system developers, government agencies, NGO(s) and private sectors who gave significant contributions in designing and developing certification system in Indonesia.

Bogor, December 2000

Dradjad H. Wibowo Executive Director

v

PREFACE SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT

Indonesia is the third largest bio-diversity forest resource i.n the world after Brazil and Zaire. Forest gives mankind multiple advantages, either in economy and social-cultural or in environment. To reach the balance' of those three benefits and to meet the aspect of fairness in generations, forest resources management insists a thoughtful consideration with long-term perception.

Forest resource is one of the natural resources under the state control and needs to be made the most of for the people's welfare. The state is usually perceived as "territory, government and people". Forest retains public functions that have to be preserved in providing people's life with essential environmental and social facilities.

One of the methods to urge sustainable forest management is by applying forest certification. In forest certification the performance of forest management is evaluated by examining the aspects of production, ecology and social. Any forest manager shall give their concern to sustainable functions of forest production, ecology and social. In Indonesia, forest certification initiative emerged after 1992 Earth Summit Conference in Rio de Janeiro. The first step of this initiative was to establish "Ecolabelling Working Group" that participated by parties with concern to forest situations, they were from government, academicians, NGO and private. Through long and tense discussions, an agreement on certification system was at last made. They were: 1. Sustainable forest management criteria and indicators 2. Certification application procedures 3. General requirements for persons involved with certification work, and 4. Manual for certification decision-making For a credible certification system, the preparation process was made transparently and by act of participatory with reference to international standards. In addition, certification system shall at all times keep an eye to specific conditions in Indonesian forests resources.

It is hoped that certification system established together with the stakeholders will be properly employed. Without the support from all parties in applying this certification it would be difficult for us to attain a fair and sustainable forest management. Therefore, the book is prepared with the above spirit as well as expectation of giving assistance to our goal: To Sustainably Develop the Forest.

Bogor, December 2000

Emil Salim Board on Trustees

VI

ABOUT THE LEI STANDARDS; LEI GUIDELINES,

LEI TECHNICAL AND ACADEMIC DOCUMENTS

1. LEI standards describe system framework for sustainable production forest management, which

are the basis for certification implementation. The standards also become assesment

frameworks for Sustainable Prodcution Forest Management System (SPFM).

2. The LEI Guidelines is the reference during an implementation of SPFM Certification activity,

these guidelines define procedures for Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management

(SNPFM) including procedure for the process of appealing against certification decision.

LEI Guidelines in SNPFM comprises of three main parts:

2.1 LEI Guidelines series 99-00 explains Minimum Requirements for certification

implementers i.e.: certification bodies, Assesors and Experts Panel.

2.2 LEI Guidelines series 99-10 explains Training Systems, Requirements for Training

Institution, and Personnel Registration Body.

2.3 LEI Guidelines series 99-20 explains Procedures for Certification Implementation,

Decision Making, Formulating Recommendation,s, Reporting and Surveillance.

3. LEI Technical Document~ are available for references in the assesments or in developing quality

system for certification bodies. Available documents to date are Verifier and Verification Toolbox

for Assessment Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management

(SNPFM) System and Indicators of Intensity Scale for Sustainable Production Forest

Management.

4. The Academic Document provides background, logical framework and the urgent to develop

SPFM certification system.

5. This publication is prepared for the interest of SNPFM certification implementation in Indonesia.

These guidelines are developed particularly to lead Executive Board of LEI, Secretariat and

Certification Bodies as well as concerned partfes.

5.1 For LEI Executive Board:

5.1.1 To provide a basis to evaluate certification bodies for accreditation process.

5.1.2 To provide a basis for developing other procedures

5.1.3 To provide for a transparency as LEI is required to be credible with the

stakeholders including government, private sector in forestry, certification bodies,

Personnel Registration Body, NGO(s) and general public.

vu

5.2 For Certification Bodies:

5.2.1 To provide a concise framework to facilitate the' development of effective

certification systems

5.2.2 As reference in developing quality system for the certification bodies

5.2.3 To specify the performance that should be achieved by certification bodies in order

of maintaining their accreditation from LEI

5.3 For management unit:

5.3.1 As a framework in achieving sustainable forest management.

5.3.2 As a reference for internal assesment in management unit to prepare for

certification.

5.4 For concerned parties

5.4.1 As a reference to understand certification system that has been applied,

5.4.2 As a reference in the monitoring process of certification implementation, '.

5.4.3 As a reference for inputs providing as well as critics to the certification

implementation,

5.4.4 As a reference for providing inputs and critics to the certification system.

Vlll

SHORT NOTES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF CERTIFICATION SYSTEM

1. LEI Standards, LEI Guidelines and Technical Documents have been developed through various consultations with multi-stakeholders in the form of seminars, workshop, meetings with selected participants, small group meetings and others.

2. LEI Standards, LEI Guidelines, and LEI Technical Documents has been developed through a long process, started in September 1999 to November 11, 1999.

3. In February 1998, the Ministry of Forestry initiated a workshop to discuss criteria and indicators for a system of management on natural production forest. The participants of the workshops were from government agencies (Ministry of Forestry), Indonesian Ecolabelling Working Group, and APHI Expert Team Members. The result was an agreement to a set of criteria and indicator for sustainable natural production forest management.

4. With reference to the above workshop results, Indonesian Standardization Body (ISB) endorsed the standards for sustainable production forest management as a guidelines for an implementation to be applied as the ISB Standard and Guidelines in 1998;

• SNI1 9-5000-1 998: The Framework for Sustainable Production Forest Management

• SNl19.-5000-1-1998 : The System for Sustainable Production Forest Management

• SNI 19-5005-1998: Terms and Definitions relating to Production Forest Certification

• BSN Guideline 99 : Certification System for Sustainable Production Forest Management

5. With respect to various inputs and critics via letters, fax,' e-mail messages delivered to LEI Secretariat from the stakeholders on criteria and indicators for sustainable production forest management and its certification system, as well as recommendations from various discussion/workshops and other public meetings on LEI Standards and Guidelines to concerned parties in Indonesia together with memorandum of understanding between LEI and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), LEI Board of Trustees decided to revise (amend) LEI certification system.

6. During the joint activities between LEI and FSC in international workshops, and joint field test for both systems, a revision needs to be conducted to the certification system (in subjects of Procedure for Certification Implementation as well as Criteria & Indicators) of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management.

7. On November 11, 1999 -after system development and revision process was completed- LEI Board of Trustees approved LEI Standards, LEI Guidelines and LEI Technical bocuments as the Final Documents as stated in a letter of apPiOval No. 02/LEI/SKlBP/XII99 signed by Prof. Dr. Emil Salim. The revision process followed. the stages as described in LEI numbering system.

8. This publication is based on a review of all comments and suggestions received until 2000. It has also been reviewed by the LEI editorial team to ensure the clarity, accuracy and adaptability of the sentences structure.

All parties are invited to give comments and suggestions to this publication. All inputs should be delivered to LEI Secretariat

IX

CONTENT

Content ............................................................................................ x

Numbering System Of The Indonesian Ecolabelling Institute Forest Certification

System Documents

Gratitudes ................................................................................ ......... iv

Preface Sustainable Forest Management ..................................................... vi

About The LEI Standards, LEI Guidelines, LEI Technical And Academic

Documents ...... ........ . . ........... ........... . ......... .........•. ..•.... .. ......... . . . ... . .• vii

Short Notesln The Development Process Of Certification System ....................•. ix

LEI Guideline 99-11 Training Guid~line for SPFM Certification Field Assessor........... 1

LEI Guideline 99-12 Training Guideline for SPFM Certification Expert Panel ..... 0...... 23

LEI Guideline 99-13 Training Guideline for SPFM Certification Trainer ................. ~. 31

LEI Guideline 99-14 General Criteria for SPFM Certification Training Institution ..... :. 39

LEI Guideline 99-15 General Criteria for SPFM Certification Personnel Training

Institution ................................................................. ". 49

x

LEI GUIDELINE 99-11

TRAINING GUIDELINE FOR FIELD SSESSOR OF SUSTAINABLE

PRODUCTION FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

1. Introduction

Training Guideline for Field Assessor is aimed to create a system for the sustainable production

forest management (SPFM) Field Assessor Training.

SPFM Field Assessor is an individual who has authorization to perform field assessment in the

SPFM certification process. SPFM Field AS$essor shall be without any financial and/or ownership

and/or other relationship with certain Management Unit that would lead to possible conflict of

intere$t. Field Assessors are classified into Field Assessor, Senior Field Assessor and Lead

Assessor. This training program is aimed for Field Assessor and Lead Assessor.

2. Scope

The aim of this guideline is to determine the criteria and requirements for Sustainable Production

Forest Management (SPFM) Field Assessor Training and for field assessor training system that

have been used as reference by the training bodies. The guideline consists of:

a) Criteria and requirements for SPFM Field Assessor and SPFM Lead Assessor training

candidates.

b) Professional ranks of SPFM Field Assessors,

c) Field Assessor Training System (subject, objective, discussion topic, material, timing,

learning method and participant's target, which are: 1. Field Assessor, 2. Lead Assessor)

3. References

1. LEI Standard 5000, Sustainable Production Forest Management System Framework.

2. LEI Standard 5005, Terms and Definitions Relating to Forest Certification.

1

3. LEI Guideline 99, Sustainable Production Forest Management (SPFM) Certification

System.

4. LEI Guideline 99-02, General Requirements for SPFM Certification Field Assessor.

4. Criteria and Requirements for SPFM Field Assessor Training Candidate

Rank 'of Field Assessor:

1. Field Assessor

2. Senior Field Assessor

3. Lead Assessor

4.1 Field Assessor (hereafter refer to as FA)

Scope of experience, competency, skill and attitude of SPFM-FA training candidate:

a) Qualify with Certification Field Assessor criteria as defined by LEI Guideline 9'9-02.

b) Candidates shall attach their experiences in the curriculum vitae form that states:

personal data, work experiences and other supplementary records, together with

testimonials/ other verification and personal statement.

c) Technically capable to perform the work of field assessment in the Management Unit

area.

d) Qualified to perform field information/data analysis and make conclusions for each

indicator in his/her aspect of expertise and submit a well-presented report of field

assessment results.

e) Possess good communication skill, in speaking and in writing.

4.2 Lead Assessor (hereafter refer to as LA)

Expertise, education and experience of SPFM-LA training candidate:

a) LA training candidate shall meet the qualifications of expertise, education and experience

for FA following the LEI Guideline 99-02.

b) Training candidates shall attach their experiences in the curriculum vitae form that states:

personal data, working experiences and other supplementary records, together with

testimonials/other verification and personal statement.

5. Assessor Rank Based on LEI Guideline 99-02 and LEI Guideline 99-01, standard professional ranking are as below:

RANKS OF SFPM CERTIFICATION FIELD ASSESSOR

~r:::. ~~~, tAl .~~~M'""'''''''!MW!'':W* ¥~w ... 1.1 T'1 AA\i.1I!.t;~

EJ'I EDUCATIONAL 11 TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE LEVEL 1 PRE-REQUIREMENT8 11 PRE-REQUIREMENT8 ................................................ I..... ................................................. .. ........................... J I.... ............................................. ........................................................................ .. .......................................... .. I I· Fie!d Assessor Training certificate or Field Assessor I

I co~petency certificate .. . 0-3 + 5 years experience i· Registered at the Personnel Registration Body as Field

I . i Assessor

8-1 + 3 years experience !. Good communication skill, in speaking and in writing. I •

PL

I I I~~.~_ ........ __ .• ~_._ .. ___ .... J _._"._.~_:-~ .. '_ .. _ ... __ .. __ '~ .. _._ ... ". . ............ h ........... ___ ........ ' _1 ,_, ._ ... ~ .. _ ... __ ... _ .. _ ............ H' •...... __ •.. _ .....• _ •..... ___ ._._ •. _._ ... _ .... ____ ~ __ ..••.. _ ......... _ ....... __ ........ __ ._. __ --:.H ......... ___ •• H.· •. _ ..... _ .. ~j

PLM

I' .,

same as above

• Registered at the Personnel Registration Body as a Senior Field Assessor

• Have been conducted at least two field assessments (LEI Guideline 99-02, point 5.3) or have worked for three full years in field assessment (LEI Guideline 99-02, point 5.1 (b)).

I1 · No requirement to participate in Senior Field Assessor training !

I. .................................................... .l L................................ .. .. _ ....... _ .................... __ ................................ 1 L ................................................... _ ....................... _ ........ _ ....................... _ ....................................................... _ ...................... _ ................... _ ................ }

I · Passed SF A training or SF A Competency Test ! • Registered at the Personnel Registration Body as SF A I i

Have been conducted at least five field assessment (LEI I •

I Guideline 99-02) or have a minimum five full years working PLK 0-3 I experience in the Management Unit (LEI Guideline 99-02)

1 I

8-1 ! I In case one Lead Assessor is not available, the Personnel I Registration Body may appoint a Lead Assessor by special

consideration (LEI Guideline 99-02, point 4.3. b) I I i I

- .. ~.

1. 6. SFPM Field Assessor Training System

This 8FPM Field Assessor Training Program is conceived by based on the training needs for

Field Assessor (FA) and Lead Assessor (LA) in compliance with LEI Guideline 99-02. This

training program contains information regarding the curriculum and syllabus, together with other

information necessary to ensure an accomplishment of training.

3

7. Core of Competency

Core of Competency for Field Assessor are:

1. Competent in factcfinding and data-collecting

2. Competent in conducting analysis to each indicator in their field of expertise

3. Competent in reaching conclusion regarding Management Unit performance

4. Competent in report-writing based on available facts/data

Core of Competency for Senior Field Assessor are:

1. Capability of Senior Field Assessor

2. Competent in delivering input for development of evaluation method

Core of Competency for Lead Assessor are:

1. Competency as Lead Assessor

2. Competent to make evaluation work-plan

3. Competent in organizing the team of Field Assessors

4. Competent in delivering Field Assessor Team work-performance evaluation

5. Competent to present report systematically

8. Competency Test

The Core of Competency is mostly required to design procedure and mechanism of Competency

Test. The test shall be conducted by Personnel Registration Body to evaluate a certification

personnel competency under below considerations:

1. A need to assure the competency of personnel to perform the task as SFPM Certification Field

Assessor.

2. Adequate experience and expertise in the related field.

3. Public admittance through a reference given by certain party (ies) that specifies the related ..

personnel is beyond any doubt a specialist with experience and has the capability to perform a

special. activity, thus considered not necessary to be given more formal training .

.. '

There are two results of Competency Test, COMP~TENT and NOT COMPETENT.

9. Training Curriculum

The curriculum is posed as the minimum standard for a Trainin.g Body to conduct training. The

curriculum must at least describe: subject, objective/target, topic, topic description, learning method

and number of class-hour (noch). The curriculum attached to this guideline is an inseparable part

and may be revised throughout development of the system. Attachment 1 is Sustainable Natural

Forest Production Management (SNFPM) training curriculums, covering:

A. Training Curriculum for Field Assessor in Production Aspect

B. Training Curriculum for Field Assessor in Ecological Aspect

C. Training Curriculum for Field Assessor in Social Aspect

D. General Training Curriculum for Field Assessor

E. Training Curriculum for Lead Assessor

5

» --I

--I » ('")

::I:

S m

z --I

ATTACHMENT 1. SUSTAINABLE NATURAL-FOREST PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT TRAINING CURRICULUMS

A. TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR FIELD ASSESSOR OF PRODUCTION ASPECT

TIME

No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVE TOPIC TOPIC DESCRIPTION (No of LEARNING class- METHOD hour)

1 Description of Criteria and Training participants are • Production Aspect • How to establish the C&1. 8 class-hr Lecture, Indicator in Production expected to: principles linked with Activities relating to forest discussion and Aspect

• Understand the logical the output dimension management and timber case study framework to establish a • Production Aspect production process. general criteria and principles are linked • Sustainability of forest Teaching indicator with the management resources, production and Team:

• Recognize the C&I for dimension industry Production Aspect in their Elaboration and

Expert team, •

early process explanation of C&I in Logging,

Be familiar with data Production Aspect management • and Silviculture collecting method in • Sampling techniques Production Aspect in data collecting

• Understand how to • Evaluate intensity determine intensity scale scale of C&I for in Production Aspect Production Aspect

2 Production Forest Training participants understand • Timber production • Sustainable forest evaluation Management the significance of production process, forestry mechanism that relates to

forest management in achieving regulations, ITSP, ITT, forest management and Sustainable Forest logging infrastructure production. Management framework development, logging, • Annual Activity Plan

skidding, bucking, log development and confirmation transfer and process. production. • Differences between

regulations implementation and SNPFM

'7

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME

LEARNING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of hours) METHODS

3 Reduced Impact Logging Training participant are • RIL concept criteria • RIL criteria 2 class-hr Lecture, (RIL) expected to be acquainted with • How to develop RIL • RIL requirements discussion and

the concept of RIL implementation What • Post- logging evaluation case study is the focus of RIL • How to conclude whether a impleme"ntation Management Unit has

• Tool and equipment in implemented RIL concept RIL implementation

4 Forest Inventory Training pa~icipant familiar with • Government • Government regulation relating 2 class-hr Lecture and Assessment forest inventory assessment regulation on forest to SDH accounting and case study

methods inventory assessment relevance with SPFM • System and forest • Accurate assessment of forest

resource inventory as inventory as asset or capital an asset • Various assessment methods

• SDH assessment in SDH accounting method in SPFM

5 Development of SPFM Training participants are • Observation' to the • Description of production 2 class-hr Discussion Assessment Method expected to have the skill to existing methods aspect assessment method as and case

make recommendation for a verifier tool to justify the study assessment method indicator assessed improvement based on their • Development of • Experiences during the use of experiences . assessment methods reliable and accurate appliance

of method • Several recommendations in

assessment method

J~.

: DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME TEACHING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of

hours} METHODS

6 Chain of Custody/COC Participants aware of the • The function of COC • Description on COCas legality 2 class-hr Lecture, Certification concept and mechanism of in forest sustainability assessment for timber in nodes, discussion and

COC certification • Relevance between where timber mutation are made case study COC certification and (forest outflow to industrial inflow timber trade gate)

• COC principles • Relevance of COC certification with international market demand

• COC Route 1, Route 2 and Route 3

7 Field Assessment Exercise Participants conduct a complete • Team Work- Schedule 8 class-hr • Assessment Schedule field assessment using C&I of • Determination of Management Mock

production aspect, starting from • Meeting with Unit typology Assessment • Assessment for all methodology selection, field Management Unit • Plan the checklist based on C&I exercise

criteria and indicators preparation and data collecting • Data and information of production aspect 16 class-collecting based on • Sampling method hr Exchange the C&I of production • Data collecting procession experience, aspect. • Progress report guided by

• Field discussion Senior Assessor

8 Field data analysis and Participants make justification of Categorizing and • Data and information analyzing 8 class-hr report-writing each indicator's intensity scale, transferring of data into • Technique and method of data

and write the report each indicator value categorizing to each value of (range: very poor- each indicator of production excellent). aspect;

• Field assessment results report writing

• Evaluation on production aspect throuQh decision-making pJocess

q

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME LEARNING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of hours) METHODS 9 Presentation of field Participants deliver systematic • Presentation of data 4 class-hr Simulation and assessment result based on presentation in production analyzing result in • From the report, each participant Role-play actual field assessment aspect to meet the requirement front of Expert Panel I! shall be accountable of his/her result for decision-making process (simulatiori) field assessment result in front of

Expert Panel 11, and to make conclusion or clarification of various issues related to the

. finding (Note: Expert Panel 11 represented by facilitators)

• Facilitators briefed the participants on how to make presentation and provide them with various strategies to meet data requirement as demanded by Expert Panel 11, 10. Examination / Evaluation 0 To determine participant's 4 class-hr Written test level of capacity as the

candidate of production aspect assessor

0 To meet the qualification standards defined by Personnel Registration Body,

.-~~--.-, .. - "---'--~'-""-'--~"'."'-'

8. TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR FIELD ASSESSOR OF ECOLOGICAL ASPECT

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME LEARNING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of hours) METHOD

1 Conservation and Participants recognize: • Principles of genetics, Lecture, maintenance of genetics, • typology of ecological species and • Principles of genetics, species 3 class-hr discussion, map species and ecosystem aspect ecosystem diversity arid ecosystem diversity or drawing diversity within the • genetics, species and conservation and conservation and maintenance demonstration management of natural ecosystem diversity,· maintenance and intensive interaction with and LCD panel production forest principles and their • Relevance of genetics, Sustainable Production Forest

relevance with sustainable species and Management (SPFM) natural production forest ecosystem diversity • Early ecological typology is management (SNPFM) with Sustainable determined based on secondary

Production Forest data: map and other available Management (SPFM) information. By further adding

• Determining of social typology, a Management ecological typology Unit typology will then be

specified 2 Description of Ecological Participants recognized: Describe each C&I of ecological

C&I • Ecological C&I and the Ecological C & I aspect and method to collect and 4 class-hr Lecture and relevance with SPFM • Wild animal analyze the data. discussion

• Vegetation • Soil and Water

Conservation • Various methods to be Description of each method shall

3 Ecological Data Collecting employed • Description of data cover: Methods collecting method for • wild life,

each indicators • vegetation, 5 class-hr • Strength and • soil and water 4 class-hr

weakness of certain 4 class-hr method

11

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME LEARNING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of hoursJ

METHOD 4 Mock Assessment Participants have the • Team pre-assessment • Listing of documents/data to be 4 class-hr

• Development of competence to conduct field • Designing of work- used (1-3) Mock assessment assessment using the C&I of schedule • Decision on final work-schedule Assessment methods ecological aspect, including data and sample site Field exercise

finding and data verifying

• Description of data • Alternative method for each 6 class-hr collecting for each indicator in ecology (2-4) ecological indicator

• Data collecting and • Sampling design 16 class-hr field application • Field data collecting exercise

5 Field data management • Field data analysis • Data and information • Field data and reporting 4 class-hr analysis (secondary data) relevancy

• Categorizing levels of ecological • Categorizing or data indicator employed during

transfer to levels of determination of management indicator (range: very Unit performance quality in poor - excellent). ecological aspect (using AHP

method) • Reporting • LEI Guideline 99-21, • Reporting shall be in compliance 4 class-hr

99-22 with definitions stated in LEI Guideline 99-02

6 Examination / Evaluation 0 To recognize participant's 4 class-hr Written test level of capacity as the candidate for assessor in production aspect

0 To meet the qualification standards as defined by Personnel Registration Boqy

C. TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR FIELD ASSESSOR'oFSbcIALASPECT

No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME (No LEARNING : of hour) METHOD

1 Logical framework Participants acquain~ed with • SPFM levels of logical • SPFM .and principles of 2 class-hr Lecture and of SPFM social SPFM logical framework framework Production, Ecology and discussion aspect hierarchy and the position of • Social aspect in SPFM Social

social aspect in the logical framework • Criteria and Social framework. Sustainabllity in SPFM

2 SPFM typology of • Participants recognize • Production typology as • Social typology 2 class-hr Lecture and Social aspect typological relations of result of social and • Ecological typology discussion

social, ecology and ecology typology • Production typology production aspects estimation • Intensity scale in social

• Participants are • Social aspect typology problems acquainted with factors • Intensity scale in social • Intensity parameter in with potential to increase problems social problems social problems in forestry sector

3 Models o(Natural • Forest management • Natural resource 2 class-hr Lecture, Resource • Participants recognize concept management activities discussion and Management models of natural • Familiarity with agro- (before and after the case study

resource and forest forestry and social Management Unit management within the forestry concepts activities) community • Models and patterns of • Economical,cultural,

• Participants local community natural ecology and religious acknowledge local resource management aspect in forest community interpretation • Tangible and intangible management of natural resources benefits of forest • Timber and non-timber existence as means to • Agro-forestry analysis processing support their income • Productivity and • Intensive and extensive

• Competent in measuring sustainability concept pattern in forest and analyzing • Management Unit management productivity aspect and influence to the • Positive and negative

p,

sustainability in natural influence to the impacts after natural resource management management of natural resource management of

• Recognized the effect of resource the Management Unit forest industry process to local community access in managing their natural resources

4 Natural Resource • Conversant and capable • Tenurial system concept • Land tenurial, tree and 2 class-hr Lecture Tenurial in identifying various • Identification techniques water· Discussion

types of resources of tenurial system • Ownership and Case study tenurial • MeasLlring of management rights

• Recognize Management Management Unit • Personal and community Unit concession impact concel:;sion impact to rights to natural resource local community natural • Tenurial rights in tenurial system resource tenurial system Indonesia

• Several techniques in measuring the impact of forest concession to local tenurial system

5 Natural resource • Familiar with tenurial law • Local perceptive and • Local perceptive 2 class-hr Lecture protection system and local community natural resource • T enuriallaw Discussion

practice in natural . protection • Natural resource Case Study resource protection • Natural resource protection by local

practices community 6 Social integration Participant will have the • Social and cultural • Understanding social and 2 class-hr Lecture

and. community capability to understand integration cultural integration Discussion culture community's elements of • Disintegration within the • Human rights Case Study

social and cultural integration community and the • Community capacity progress with its threats impacts building

• Integration threats 7 Conflict and Participant .recognize models, • . Types of conflict • Latent conflict type and 2 class-hr Lecture

management of types and conflict intensity, • Conflict models the manifestation Discussion conflict and conflict management in • Conflicts between forest Case Study

"

forest management activity • Conflict intensity benefactors Instigating • ' .. C.onnict nlaf}agement " • Competition, contra-

versiOri arid conflict • Principles and techniques

in conflict management

8 Environmental and Participant are in terms with • Syndrome development • Illnesses caused by 2 class-hr Lecture Public Health environmental and public concept syndrome progress Discussion

health potential problems • Efforts to minimize the • Internalizing to external Case Study caused by Management Unit impact of Management • Efforts to minimize activity Unit activity to negative impacts to health

environmental and public health.

9 Work-relations Participant recognize work- • Workers basic-rights • Types of workers basic- 2 class-hr Lecture relations aspect in forest • Work Health and Safety rights Discussion concession activity • Worker's welfare • Government regulation Case Study

concerning work health and safety

• Various problems in forestry sector workers

• Compensation" and promotion proceedings

10 Social Research Participants capable of data • Types of research • Survey 4 class-hr Lecture methodology collecting by employment of • Case Study Discussion

scientific research technique • Rural Appraisal : Rapid and procedures to meet and Participatory certification requirement

• Observation methods • Total participant • Participant as observer • Observer as participant • Participating observer • Total observation • Target group, observation

and data- keeping method

11:)

• Structured interview • Semi-structured interview

• Interview techniques • In-depth interview • Target group, interview

and data-keeping technique/respondent checklist .

• Target 'group • Reference study • Relevant document

source • Implementation technique • Data-keeping

• Contain analysis • Group discussion Target group • • Implementation technique

11 Participatory Rural Participant capable of: • Participatory approach • Concept and definition of 2 class-hr Lecture Appraisal background in participatory Discussion techniques • Understanding the development program • Participatory Rural as an Case Study

community participation • Basic concept of approach concept Participatory ~ural • Participatory Rural as an

• Evaluating community • Participatory concept and ideological system. participation in forest levels • Participatory model of management activity • Appraising technique in Sherry Arnstein's

participatory rural levels hierarchy. • Participatory measure

12 Field assessment Participant capable of making • Secondary data overview 8 class-hr Discussion schedule competent field assessment ' • Expert Panel Field Preparation

schedule recommendations appliance

• Key/selected indicator • Identification of main

techriiques employed in field assessment

,

13 Field assessment Based on the criteria and - 16 class- Mock assessment indicators, participants are' .... - hr competent to do the 'l.'0rk of data collecting .

14 Reporting Participants capable of 4 class-hr Data analyzing analyzing collected data and and Reporting write the report by LEl's standards.

15 Presentation Participants have 4 class-hr Report competency to present field presentation assessment results in front of Expert Panel

16 Examination Evaluate participant's 4 class-hr Written test knowledQe on social aspect

17

D. GENERAL TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR FIELD ASSESSORS

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME LEARNINGME No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of hours) THOD

1 Timber trade and Participants are acquainted • Timber trading • Eco-sensitive market 2 class-hr Lecture . ecolabelling certification with: structure • Buyer groups Discussion

• Timber trading in an • The role of FSC and .. Forest Stewardship Council international scale LEI • National initiative: LEI

• Wood certification • Accreditation system • Certification of Sustainable • Certification system Natural Production Forest

Management (SNPFM) • Chain of Custody Certification • Wood-product certification

2 SPFM certification system Participants recognize: • Introduction to • FSC principles 4 class-hr Lecture, • · SPFM certification system FSC certification discussion

· based on national initiative system, LEI • The development of national and comparison with other Standard, LEI certification system ..

· system, like FSC. 5000-1, and LEI LEI certification -system and its • Guide series 99 implementation in the field

• Interrelationship between • LEI Standards and Guides production, ecological and social aspects.in the whole • Interrelationship • Interrelationship among performance of between production aspect, the case study Management Unit. production, performance of FMU

ecological and • Interrelationship among .social aspects in ecological aspect, the the whole performance of FMU performance of • Interrelationship among social Management aspect, the performance of FMU Unit..

",.' , •. ' -

'" -,

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS TIME LEARNING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of METHOD hours)

3 Management Unit Training participants recognize E Analysis of organization and 2 class-hr Lecture, organizational and the organization and management system at forest discussion, operational analysis management system of concessions in government policy case study,

Management Unit that indicate implementation and sustainable the relevance of forest forest management context. management performance with government's forestry regulation and SFM principles.

4 The role of Field Assessor in Training participants recognize: • The role of assessors in activities 3 SPFM certification system. of planning, data collection I the

• Their role in the system Interrelation between accuracy of the data, report-assessor, and : writing, certification decision-• Certification Body making and dispute resolution • Person'nel Registration • Planning of field inspection,

Body using maps and printed • Stakeholders information;

• Their role in the process • Expert Panel • Techniques of data collection in forest area, supported by

• Working plan samples, such as conservation Data collecting areas, logged over areas, virgin

• Data analysis & report areas. writing • What make a good team

• Presentation • Assessment planning process; • Surveillance • Key factors and recommendation

for a successful team

• Investigation techniques • Techniques and methods of

sampling

19

DESCRIPTION OF TOPICS PERIOD

TEACHING No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES TOPICS (No of

METHODS hours)

5 AHP as a decision-making Training participants recognize • Basi~ concept of AHP .. Basic concept of AHP as a 2 class-hr Lecture, and recommendation AHP as tool in certification • Data structure based method of decision-making discussion, method in SPFM decision-making process in on AHP method; . Employment of assessor's data study case certification system conformity with LEI Guideline • Data transformation as basic data for AHP and it's

99-24 based on AHP method application in Expert Panel

• Decision-making decision-making as defined by process based on LEI Guide 99-24 AHP

6 Typology and decision- Training participants understand' • LEl's typology of FMU • Production, Social and 3 class-hr Lecture, making process how to determine the typology Ecolo~ical Typology discussion,

of Management Unit based on • Function of Typology simulation relevant information of decision- • Typology and field work-plan making process • Typology and decision making

process 7 Examination and Evaluation To know participants ability to 4 class-hr Written

absorb and understand the examination material given.

E. CURRICULUM DAN SYLLABUS FOR LEAD ASSESSOR TRAINING , TIME LEARNING

No. SUBJECT OBJECTIVES CURRICULUM SYLLABUS (no of hour)

METHOD

1. Forest Industry Participants' perceived latest • Indonesian Describe: 2 class-hr Lecture,

development in situation and condition in Forestry History • Indonesian forest industry discussion and

Indonesia forest industry system in • Present situation chronology up to present and forest case study

Indonesia and condition prediction in future

• Future forecast • Idealistic condition in Indonesian forest manaqement.

2. Forest policy and Participants recognized the • Former and current Describe: 1 class-hr Lecture,

regulation in impacts of national policy in national forestry • Various Indonesian forestry policies discussion and

Indonesia forest management practice policy by considering the level of interest case study

and relevance to SPFM • Impact of forestry for government and forest

certification policy concession holders. implementation in • Relevance of forestry policy-

Participants acquainted with SPFM certification making process and the outcome

the process of government and forest with forest management.

policy-making and the management • Positive and negative impacts of

implications processes. the policy implementation to forest

• Policy-making sustainability and forest certification process and the process. implication.

3. Management of Participants will be capable of Describe to participants on how to 6 class-hr Lecture,

field assessment making plan, organizing, conduct SPFM field assessment: discussion,

activity in the implementing and evaluating • Logistic planning and field de mo nstratio n

Management Unit the activity of field • Planning equipment and case study

assessment in forest • Camping Ground scheming

management. .. Assessment Team Working

• Organizing Schedule • Effective scheduling of field working

team and concession team

• Implementing • Selecting typical plots to be • Monitoring assessed

• Assessment proceeding • Field assessment result data -

21

checking and evaluating 4. Report writing Participants capable of • Syst~fl1atic report- • Consequence of AHP employment 2 class-hr Discussion and

technique making repoct systematically writing techniques in report format exercise under the interest of SPFM forAHP • SFPM report systematic certification decision-making requirement • Systematic report-writing

5. Presentation Participants capable of • Successful • Presentation preparation 2 class-hr Discussion and technique presenting reports techniques of • Presentation and discussion exercise

systematically in decision- presentation • Presentation closing making process

6. Requirements for Participants acknowledge • ExpertPanel • Difference between Expert Panel I 4 class-hr Lecture, SPFM Certification Expert Panel working working system ·and Expert Panelll and the tasks discussion and Expert Panel and procedure and document • Document and • What, who, when & how to proceed case study evaluation and!or report evaluation reporting documents & reports assessment technique for field evaluation by • AHP process and Expert Panel assessment Expert involvement in decision-making documentation! • Decision-making by • CRC and dispute resolution reporting ExpertPahel

• Dispute resolution by Certification Review Council (CRC)

• Expert Panel responsibilities and authorities

7. Role-play in SPFM ParticipClnt"understand the • AHP simulation • Field assessor presentation 5 jpl Exercise certification SPFM certification decision- with a case of X • AHP simulation decision-making making process Management Unit • Decision-making process (model)

Participants recognize the • Role play significance role of field assessor in decision-making process

8. Examination for To evaluate how far are the 2jpl Written test Lead Assessor partiCipants absorb the

training material given in Lead Assessor class ..

t ',_

LEI GUIDELINE 99-12 .

GUIDELINE FOR EXPERT PANEL IN SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

1. Introduction

The guideline for t;xpert Panel Training is designed with aim of creating a training system for Expert

Panel in SPFM certification program.

Expert Panel needs to be trained to perform the work of decision-making based on Management Unit

documentation. The documentation consists of: primary data, planning and reporting on forest

management conduct; printed and verbal description of SPFM logical structure; verification and

validation of field assessment results; active participation of each member in collective decision-

making process; level of evaluation result decision on Management Unit performance by adopting

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) system.

Various perceptions and expertise of the Expert Panel shall be integrated in order of understanding

the SPFM logical framework and to employ field assessment results in decision-making process.

2. Scope

2.1 The aim of this guideline is to define both criteria and general requirements for Sustainable

Production Forest Management Expert Panel and Training System for SPFM Expert Panel.

2.2 SPFM Expert Panel is: 1). Expert Panel I for pre-field assessment screening process stage, and

2). Expert Panel 11 for Management Unit performance' evaluation and SPFM certification

decision-making stage.

2.3 The guideline consists of document as stated below:

a) Criteria and requirement for training candidates of : 1. SPFM Expert Panel I, and 2. SPFM

Expert Panel 11,

b) Training System for Expert Panel (topics, objective, discussion topic, material, time,

learning methods and target participants)

LEI Guideline 99-12 23

3. References

1. LEI Standard 5000, Sustainable Production Forest Management System Framework

2. LEI Standard 5005, Terms and Definitions Relating to Sustainable Forest Management

Certification

3. LEI Guideline 99, Sustainable Production Forest Management Certification System

4. LEI Guideline 99-03, General Requirements for Expert Panel

5. Criteria and Requirements for SPFM Expert Panel Training Candidate

4. 1. Expert Panel I (hereafter abbreviated as EP I)

4.1.1. EP I training candidate conditions, criteria and qualifications:

a) Should have met criteria and conditions for EP I as defined by LEI Guideline 99-03

b) SPFM Expert Panel I shall have relevant experience of minimum 5 (five) years, and/or

have 10 (ten) auditing experiences in the Management Unit

c) Candidate shall submit data in the form of curriculum vitae, consists of: personal data,

working experience, professional experience and other supporting data, attached with

testimonials/other verification and personal statement.

d) EP I candidate shall sign a statement that states no conflict of interest with the

Management Unit and he/she is presently not working under Certification Body structure.

4.2. Expert Panel 11 (hereafter abbreviated as EP 11)

4.2.1. EP II training candidate conditions, criteria and qualifications for:

a) Should have met criteria and conditions for Expert Panel 11 as defined by LEI Guideline

99-03

b) EP 11 training candidates shall be for those that have met the criteria and qualifications for

Expert Panel II member

c) Candidate shall submit data in curriculum vitae form, consists of: personal data, working

experience, professional experience and other supporting data, attached with

testimonials/other verification and personal statement.

d) EP I candidate shall sign a statement that states no conflict of interest with the

Management Unit and he/she is presently not working under Certification Body structure

e) EP II candidate shall have the skill or expertise that represented by elements of:

1. Expert Panel I member

2. Forest management expert: production, silviculture and company management

LEI Guideline 99-12 24

3. Forest ecology/wild animal managemenUenvironmental expert

4. Anthropology/sociology/human-ecology expert

5. Economic/Demography expert

6. Non-Government Organization with accurate knowledge of local condition (assessed

Management Unit)

7. Local community representative that is familiar with relating Management Unit

condition

Both Expert Panel I and Expert Panel II shall have been registered in Personnel Registration Body

before starting their duty

1. SPFM Expert Panel Training System

Expert Panel training system in the form of curriculum is designed by training needs for: 1). Expert

Panel I, and 2). Expert Panel 11, in compliance with LEI Guideline 99-03. This curriculum is a minimal

standard and could be developed farther. It is an inseparable attachment of this guideline.

Attachment 1 is a training curriculum for Sustainable Production Forest Management Expert Panel

6. Core of Competency

1. Capable of speed reading and designing "on purpose review"

2. Competent to convert the review results into SPFM logical framework structure

3. Capable of recognizing cross sectional linkages into SPFM logical framework structure

4. Capable of determining the typology of Management Unit and making the interpretations

5. Capable of identifying Management Unit efficient performance

6. Have the competency to participate in collective decision-making

7. Have the ability to make judgment through pair-wise comparison and its consequences

• 8. Have the capacity to translate decision-making tool results

9. Capable of providing assessment summary with relevance to decision-making tool results

1·1=1 r:::llirip.linp. qq-12 25

ATTACHMENT 1. CURRICULUM DAN SYLLABUSFOR-SPFM'EXPERT PANEL TRAINING

Subject Time Learning

No. Topic Objective Material (Syllabus) (No of

(Curriculum) class-hour) Method

BASIC TOPICS 1. Group Discussion Participants are expected to • Class introducing

• Group/class ice breaking 4 class-hr Exercise,

have readiness to learn with • Introduction discussion

discipline, independently and • Work in group · Apply Johari window have a sense of teamwork as • Transactional analysis

well as open communication in • Two way communication

the spirit of togetherness · Team building • Participant's need assessment 2. Speed reading and Participant are expected to be

4 class-hr Theory and

on purpose review able to understand how to • Speed reading exercise

technique exercise speed reading technique

technique, in particular reading • Reviewing technique the field assessment report and how to make review based on data and facts in the report

MAIN TOPICS 1. Definition of Expert Participants understand the what • General des

cription Description of : 4 class-hr Lecture,

Panel for Sustainable and why of Expert Panel (EP I of Expert Panel • Expert Panel definition and the discussion

Production Forest and EP 11) qualifications and • Criteria for Expert relevance to SPFM certification

Management responsibilities in the Panel selecting and process

Certification Management Unit certification appointing • Duty, function and responsibility of EP

process, following the BSN • Expert Panel I, EP 11 and EP III Guideline 99-05-1998 responsibilities and

the relevance to Certification Body

I r-l ,-.. .. :.J .... I! ........ no -1') 27

2. Document checking, Participant capable of • Management Unit • Participants are guided in conducting 6 class-hr Lecture, reporting and performing professional document assessment of Management Unit discussion and screening result assessment on: assessment documents by adopting assessment exercise recommendation- • Documents supplied by technique reporting and recommendation-making techniques, Management Unit and with • Reporting and making techniques as required to document checking a sharp sense of capturing recommendation decide field assessment process technique and field related Management Unit technique on proceeding assessment result condition assessed • Participants are guided in conducting evaluation • Assessment result of Management Unit evaluation on assessor reporting and

assessor team as core • Document evaluation result consistency substance of decision- assessment and • Participants will be given framework making process assessor reporting and technique of data presentation.

procedures • Framework and

technique of data presentation by field assessor

• Decision-making process based on AHP

3 .. Decision-making Participants understand • Methods and types of Description of : 4 class-hr Lecture, technique decision-making process decision-making • Decision-making techniques in discussion and

mechanism general and how to analyze case- exercise through • Decision-making study data decision-making

. processes process • Decision analysis simulation

based on assessor's SPFM assessment

4. Sustainable Natural Participants get the picture of • SNI Standard 19- Explanation of: 4 class-hr Lecture, Forest Production Sustainable Natural Forest 5000 • Sustainable Production Forest discussion and Management Management based on SNI • SNI Standard 19- Management system definition case study.

Guideline 19-5000-1-1998 5000-1 - 1998 • Logical framework' matrix of • sustainable forest management

system in Management Unit level • Several major indicators and the

assessment method in sustainable . forest manaqement system

5. AHP as the method Participants recognize Analytical • Basic concept.of Description of: 6 class-hr Lecture, for decision and Hierarchy Process (AHP) as AHP • Basic concept of AHP as a method in discussion and recommendation- decision-making method in • AHP-based data decision-making simulation making in sustainable compliance with BSN Manual structure • How the assessor data translated into n a tu ral forest 99-24 • Data transformation AHP primary data and how to be management by AHP method applied in Expert Panel decision-

• Decision-making making input in compliance with BSN process based on Manual 99-24 AHP

6. Theory of conflict and Participants recognize types, • Types of conflict • Latent 2 class-hr Lecture, Conflict Management manifestation and intensity of • Conflict • Manifestation discussion and

conflict and understand the manifestations case stUdy management of conflict. At the • Conflict Management exercise end of training the participants are expected to be competent in describing types, manifestation, and intensity of conflict potential to occur during SPFM certification process

SUPPORTIVE TOPICS

1 Forestry Policy and Participants recognize national • Previous and present . Description of: 4 class-hr Lecture, Regulation in policy impacts on forest national policy • Various forestry policies in Indonesia discussion and Indonesia management practices and the • Forestry policy with focus on government's and case·

relevance with SPFM impact on forest concession-holder's level of interest certification management and • Forestry policy relevance with forest

SPFM certification management • Positive and negative impacts of

policy implementation to forest sustainability and forest certification process

2. Indonesian Participants understand the who, • LEI Overview Description of 6 class-hr Lecture and Ecolabelling when, what, why, and how of • LEI's certification • LEI entirety and the progress in discussion Institution and Indonesian Ecolabelling system sustainable forest certification Sustainable Institution • LEI's Criteria and development Production Forest Indicator • National certification Management (SPFM) • Mutual Recognition

LEI Guideline 99-12 29

Certification System Agreement. • SNI Standard 5000-1

and BSN 99- series 3. Capita Selecta Opportunity for participants to Participant need Upon subject or topic recommended by 2 class-hr Lecture,

obtain information on their assessment participants discussion interested subject to improve their working-performance

I rl r" .. :-l .... I::..._ "n AI"\I

LEI GUIDELINE 99-13 .

TRAINING GUIDELINE FOR SUSTAINABLE

PRODUCTION FOREST MANAGEMENT TRAINER

1. Introduction

This document explains training system for the trainers involved in training conduct for field assessor

and for Expert Panel in sustainable production forest management certification system. The

guideline designed to assure the training system will give an outcome of personnel with competency

to train SPFM certification field assessor and Expert Panel.

SPFM trainer is a person with knowledge,. skill and appropriate attitude as well as capability to

deliver training in SPFM according to his/her expertise.

2. Scope

2.1 The aim of this guideline is to define the criteria and requirements ·for Sustainable Production

Forest Management Certification Program Training of the Trainers as a reference for the SPFM

Training Body.

2.2 This guideline consists:

. ··a) Requirements for Training Candidate and Candidate Selection

b) SPFM Training System (topic, objective, discussion topic, material, time and learning

method)

3. References

1. LEI Standard 5000, Sustainable Production Forest Management Framework

2. LEI Standard 5005, Terms and Definitions Relating to Sustainable Forest Management

Certification

3. LEI Guideline 99, Sustainable Production Forest Management Certification System (SPFM)

LEI Guideline 99-12 31

4. Requirements for Training Candidate and Participants Selection

4.1 Training candidates for SPFM Training for the Trainers shall be at least have S-1 degree in

relevant fields and have at least 8 years of relevant experience or practiced as Expert Panel

member or Senior Field Assessor.

4.2 Training candidate submits his/her experiences in the form of curriculum vitae that states

personal data, work experiences, professional works, and other supporting records together with

testimonials/other verifications of the candidate.

4.3 Candidate shall submit application letter to participate the training under consideration that

attachment of recommendation letters will be given the prio~ity.

4.4 Candidate shall come from field of science relevant with SPFM certification as confirmed by

diplomas or certificates of professional education, in aspects such as below:

a) Production Aspect,- that includes forest product harvesting, forest management, industry

management (forestry), forest resource economic, forest product technology or silviculture.

b) Ecological/Environment Aspect, that includes forest ecology, wild animal manageme~i,

ecology, forest resource conservation, soil and water conservation, natural resource and

environment management or biology conservation.

c) Social Aspect, that includes the fields of anthropology, sociology, human ecology or social-

economics.

4.5 Candidates shall follow and pass the selection test conducted by SPFM Training Body.

4.6 Trainers are registered in Personnel Registration Body (PRB).

5. Training Output

5.1 Participants that have passed the training are expected to have the competency of SPFM

trainers such as below:

a) Capable of delivering the training material, using the education method of adult learning

b) Capable of evaluating training conduct and trainers performance

5.2 Participants that have passed the training are responsible to give training following the specialty

of each for Field Assessor Training,.Expert Panel Training and other SPFM reinforcement

training.

6. SPFM Training Curriculum

SPFM Training fofTrainers is aimed to provide the need of field assessor and Expert Panel trainers

by following of the training system defined by LEI Guideline 99-11 and LEI Guideline 99-12. This

LEI Guideline 99-12 32

curriculum is a minimum standard and given as attachment. Attachment 1 is curriculum for SPFM

Trainers.

~EI Guideline 99-12 33

LEI GUIDELINE 99-13

TRAINING GUIDELINE FOR SUSTAINABLE

PRODUCTION FOREST MANAGEMENT TRAINER

1. Introduction

This document explains training system for the trainers involved in training conduct for field assessor

and for Expert Panel in sustainable production forest management certification system.' The

guideline designed to assure the training system will give an outcome of personnel with competency

to train SPFM certification field assessor and Expert Panel.

SPFM trainer is a person with knowledge, skill and appropriate attitude as well as capability to

deliver training in SPFM according to his/her expertise.

2. Scope

2.1 The aim of this guideline is to define the criteria and requirements for Sustainable Production

Forest Management Certification Program Training of the Trainers as a reference for the SPFM

Training Bo'dy.

2.2 This guideline consists:

a) Requirements for Training Candidate and Candidate Selection

b) SPFM Training System (topic, objective, discussion topic, material, time and learning

method)

3. References

1. LEI Standard 5000, Sustainable Production Forest Management Framework

2. LEI Standard 5005, Terms and Definitions Relating to Sustainable Forest Management

Certification

3. LEI Guideline 99, Sustainable Production Forest Management Certification System (SPFM)

4. Requirements for Training Candidate and Participants Selection

4.1 Training candidates for SPFM Training for the Trainers shall be at least have S-1 degree in

relevant fields and have at least 8 years of relevant experience or practiced as Expert Panel

member or Senior Field Assessor.

4.2 Training candidate submits his/her experiences in the form of curriculum vitae that states

personal data, work experiences, professional works, and other supporting records together with

testimonials/other verifications of the candidate.

4.3 Candidate shall submit application letter to participate the training under consideration that

attachment of recommendation letters will be given the priority.

4.4 Candidate shall come from field of science relevant with SPFM certification as confirmed by

diplomas or certificates of professional education, in aspects such as below:

a) Production Aspect, that includes. forest product harv~sting, forest management, industry

management (forestry), forest resource economic, forest product technology or silviculture.

b) Ecological/Environment Aspect, that includes forest ecology, wild animal management,

ecology, forest resource conservation, soil and water conservation, natural resource and

environment management or biology conservation.

c) Social Aspect, that includes the fields of anthropology, sociology, human ecology or social-

economics.

4.5 Candidates shall follow and pass the selection test conducted by SPFM Training Body.

4.6 Trainers are registered in Personnel Registration Body (PRB).

5. Training Output

5.1 Participants that have passed the training are expected to have the competency of SPFM

trainers such as below:

a) Capable of delivering the training material, using the education method of adult learning

b) Capable of evaluating training conduct and trainers performance

5.2 Participants that have passed the training are responsible to give training following the specialty

of each for Field Assessor Training, Expert Panel Training and other SPFM reinforcement

training.

6. SPFM Training Curriculum

SPFM Training for Trainers is aimed to provide the need of field assessor and Expert Panel trainers

by following of the training system defined by LEI Guideline 99-11 and LEI Guideline 99-12. This

LEI Guideline 99-13 32

curriculum is a minimum standard and given as attachment. Attachment 1 is curriculum for SPFM

Trainers.

LEI Guideline 99-13 33

ATTACHMENT 1. TRAINING CURRICULUMF.ORSPFM-:TRA!~ING;FO~TRAINER

Time

No. Topic ' Objective Subject· Material (Syllabus) (number Learning of class- Method

hour)

BASIC TOPICS 1. Dynamic Group Participants are expected to • Class introducing • Group/class icebreaking 4 class-hr Exercise,

have readiness to learn with • Communication • Introduction discussion discipline, independent and in • Work in a group • Apply Johari window teamwork, with ability to make • Transactional analysis open communication in the spirit • Two way communication of togetherness • Team building

• Participant's need assessment 2. Sustainable Participants understand the • SN119-5000 Description of sustainable production 4 class-hr Lecture,

Production Forest Sustainable Production Forest • SNI19-5000-1 forest management system discussion, case Management Management based on SNI 19- Description of logical framework matrix of study. Possibility Certification System '5000-1 sustainable forest management in of field exercise

Management Unit level Description of several substantial indicators and the evaluation method in sustainable forest management

3. Indonesian Forestry Participants are aware of • Previous and present Description of various forestry policies in 2 class-hr Lecture, Policy and national policy impact upon national forestry Indonesia by levels of significance on discussion Regulation forest management practice and policy government and forest concession holder

the relevance to SPFM • Forestry policy Description of the relevance of forestry certification implementation policy with forest management

impact on Description of positive and negative sustainable forestry impacts of the said policy implementation management system upon forest sustainability and forest and certification certification process process

• LEI's role in forestry policy implementation process

LEI Guideline 99-13 35

MAIN TOPICS 1. 1.a. Participants understand the TOT • Definition of Training Description of f training and level of 4 class- hr Lecture,

Training Methods and how to plan training Method significance in the learning process discussion Techniques schedule, particularly in Adult • Principles of learning Systematic training:

Learning - To identity training needs, observe priority target group, specify, select & appraise the people to be trained

- To set the training objective, draw-up the syllabus, implementation & monitoring, follow-up

- Describe various visual aids and the Participants understand how to .. Definition of training purpose in learning process

1.b. select a training aid and how to visual aid and models - Utilization of OHP transparent and 2 class-hr Visual Aids and use it to support the learning • Communication and whiteboard techniques 8 class-hr Lecture, Model process training effectiveness - Model (demonstration kit) discussion,

Participants understand how to exercise prepare a class, class material, Define informative session: objective, test, and training aids to be used special requirements, aids, preparation

1.c. Participants understand the • Class preparation, phase, presentation phase, test phase, 4 class-hr Class preparation learning method, question- class material and summary phase technique answer method, exercise and visual aids 8 class-hr

group discussion preparation Describe significant technique in class Lecture, 1.d. techniques teaching: discussion Micro Teaching • Class teaching - types of objective test 4 class-hr

method - questioning Exercise • Transfer of training - handling answers 8 class-hr • Exercise and group - principles of learning

discussion - practices Lecture, techniques - why & how people learn discussion

Exercise, presentation

",

2 Training for trainers Participants recognize how to • Select the tOPLC Description of : 4 class-hrs Lecture and

select and apply