ukrds: the policy context 26 february 2009 paul hubbard head of research policy, hefce
TRANSCRIPT
UKRDS: the policy context
26 February 2009
Paul HubbardHead of Research Policy, HEFCE
The Policy Context
• The national policy and funding framework
• Building on achievements
• A challenge: Making the case for UKRDS
Research: national policy and funding
Government policy:
• A world class national research base
• Making a clear contribution to economic growth and national well-being
National context:
• Public funding channelled through multiple sources (dual support)
• Funding in a recession: setting priorities and investing for recovery
Funding: role of HEFCE
HEFCE allocates capital and recurrent funding for research:
• As one of several interacting funding sources supporting the research base/ infrastructure; and
• To enable HEIs to pursue new research fields and lines of enquiry
We expect our funding to support a system that is
• Competitive in a global environment
• Dynamic and responsive
• Efficient in its use of public funds
Building on achievements (1)
The UK research base is
• Competitive: we are second only to the US in a number of major fields
• Dynamic and responsive: at the forefront of new ideas and increasingly responsive to the demands of research users
• Efficient: quality and volume of output is high in relation to scale of activity and level of investment
How have we done this?
Building on achievement (2)
The UK has an exceptional record in creating strong and efficient research information resources:
Print services:
Collaborative collection management (RSLP);
National research libraries;
BL Document supply centre;
UK Research Reserve
Research information resources
Online resources:
Licensing of electronic journals
JISC infrastructure services
Digital curation centre
Other support services:
Research information network
Making the case for UKRDS (1)
HEFCE hopes to see a case made for supporting a service that:
• Meets a proven need in the research base
– Research data is being and will be produced that
can be re-used
– Researchers will collaborate in ensuring it is stored
and will demand access to it later
Making the case (2)
• Is supported by a consortium of funders
– Sustainability and efficiency in the research base
are the shared concern of all main funding providers
• Is fully appropriate to the needs of researchers
– Standards for determining what is to be kept, for
how long and in what form
– Cataloguing and metadata
– Security
Making the case (3)
• Improves efficiency in the research process and is supported by a sound business case
– Evidence for levels of current and foreseeable
demand from researchers to store their data and
for access to data once stored
– Evidence for the savings from storing data which
would otherwise have to be re-created later
– Capital and recurrent costs of storage and active
management on this scale
Making the case (4)
• Sets out strong arrangements for management and future sustainability
– Ownership of the storage, of the system, of the data
– Who will determine standards and procedures
(including for updating, weeding and re-formatting
stored data)
– Arrangements designed to have a good chance of
lasting for many years
• Implementation is thoroughly planned
So there is still work to be done
Over to you!
Thank you for listening