ultra high energy cosmic rays anisotropies and astrophysical interpretation
DESCRIPTION
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Anisotropies and Astrophysical Interpretation. Alessandro Cuoco, Institute for Physics and Astronomy University of Aarhus, Denmark. May 21th 2008 XXth RENCONTRES DE BLOIS. Sky Distribution. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Anisotropies and Rays Anisotropies and
Astrophysical InterpretationAstrophysical Interpretation
Alessandro Cuoco,Institute for Physics and
Astronomy University of Aarhus,
Denmark
May 21th 2008 XXth RENCONTRES
DE BLOIS
Sky Distribution•For E>4-5 x1019 eV galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields are negligible and charged particles propagate almost rectilinearly: is it possible UHECRs astronomy?
•Energy losses impose that sources must be near (100-200 Mpc) (GZK Cutoff)
•Data from AGASA (50 events) indicate an isotropic distribution (extragalactic origin) except for a small scale clustering (point sources?)…
Auger & HIRES… GZK cutoff?!?!
AUGER ICRC07:Vertical+Inclined+Hyb
rid6σ Feature
Hires ICRC07:5σ Feature
Local Universe (Eq. Coordinates)
Looking for structures in UHECRsLooking for structures in UHECRs
M. Kachelriess & D. Semikoz Astropart. Phys. 26, 10 (2006) [astro-ph/0512498]
The rescaling is done a priori, to match the ankle feature in the spectrum
World dataset of O(100) public available UHECRs, above the “rescaled” energy of 4x1019 eV (Hires Scale)
“Both the energy dependence of the signal and its angular scale might be interpreted as first signatures of the large-scale structure of UHECR sources and of intervening magnetic fields”
Can we test that?
Some low-chance Some low-chance prob. Structure at prob. Structure at 1515oo-35-35oo!!!!!!
Clustering properties agree but structures do
not match…
Possible evidence for nearby universe structures in the ultra-high energy sky !
A.C., G. Miele, P.Serpico, PLB 660:307-314,2008,
arXiv:0706.2864
Check with PSCz: SH modelCheck with PSCz: SH model
The clustering properties of the data agree wonderfully with the SH model (chance probability of obtaining similar configurations ≈ 50%)
Not strange, after a look at the data
A.C., G. Miele, P.Serpico, PLB 660:307-314,2008 arXiv:0706.2864
Possible evidence for nearby universe structures in the ultra-high energy sky !
Auger AGNs CorrelationAuger AGNs Correlation
20 out of 27 events correlate with a nearby (within 75 Mpc) AGN within 3 degrees.
Remarkably, 5 out 7 non-correlating events lie on the galactic plane where the catalogue is incomplete and the highest deflections are
expected
Centaurus ACentaurus A
Auger Collaboration, Science, 318 (5852), 938 (2007); Auger Collaboration, Astropart.Phys.29:188-204,(2008) [arXiv:0712.2843].
AGN vs GalaxiesAGN vs Galaxies
IRAS Galaxies
Veron Cetty AGN Catalogue
Same large scale pattern but different
small scale clustering
A.C., S.Hannestad, T.Haugbølle, M.Kachelriess, P.Serpico arXiv:0709.2712, ApJ .676:807,2008
Auger AutoCorrelation
Auger AutoCorrelation compared to various model expectations
Chance probability for various models
Extragalactic Magnetic Fields
Powerful test for extra-galactic magnetic fields, very poorly known at the moment…
Worth testing!
Map of deflection Map of deflection angles from the local angles from the local
clustersclusters
CR deflection in random MF:
Auger Constrain on EGMFs:
Dolag et al. JCAP 0501:009,2005
Typical deflection maps for protonsTypical deflection maps for protons
• Larger deflections along the Galactic plane• Typical deflections around 5o
• Possible peculiar features in the bulge & haloTT
HMRPS
M. Kachelrieß, P.Serpico, M. Teshima Astrop. Phys.26, 378 [astro-ph/0510444]
E=4x1019 eV
Example of map-distortion by GMFExample of map-distortion by GMF
A.C., G. Miele, P.Serpico PLB 660:307-314,2008
Example of map-distortion by GMFExample of map-distortion by GMF
Check with PSCz: cross-correlationCheck with PSCz: cross-correlationPresence of structures
No significant cross-correlation
Also, for light nuclei both the auto-correlation and x-correlation are robust with respect to corrections in the GMF (checked 3 models and 3 “effective rigidities”)
Yet the chance probability drops from 50% to 10-15% for the SH model, for x-correlations within 50o
No statistical relevance, but reasonable for intermediate-heavy nuclei in the GMF and/or for protons with significant extragalactic deflections.
Relevant role of magnetic fields
AGN Engines
VLA: Radio Lobes
Chandra: X-ray Jets
Radio Sky
Hubble: Optical Dust Lane
CENTAURUS A
The IceCube Detector
Neutrinos from Cen A
: ~ 0.4-0.6 events/year
A.C., S.Hannestad, arXiv:0712.1830
Gamma emission: See talk of M.Kachelriess...
SummarySummary
Possibility of study of Galactic & Extra-Galactic Magnetic fields and single UHECRs sources: UHECR Astronomy
Strong hints of LSS anisotropy seen in Pre-Auger data.
Correlation with LSS (possibly AGNs) in the Auger data.
Possibility of multimessenger observations of sources with gammas, neutrinos and UHECRs