ultrafast spintronics with terahertz · pdf filephd students: organize your own symposium! 2
TRANSCRIPT
Ultrafast spintronics with
terahertz waves
Tobias Kampfrath
Terahertz Physics Group
Freie Universität Berlin
PhD students: organize your own symposium!
2
http://www.dpg-physik.de/dpg/gliederung/junge/profil/ateam/wissenschaftlich/tagungen/berlin18/phd-symposium/announcement.html
Marco Battiato
Pablo Maldonado
Peter Oppeneer
Acknowledgments
Ulrike Martens
Markus Münzenberg
Ilie Radu
Michael Gensch
Dmitry Turchinovich
FHI THz group
Lukas Braun
Sebastian Mährlein
Tom Seifert
Martin Wolf
Frank Freimuth
Stefan Blügel
Yuriy Mokrousov
S. Jaiswal, G. Jakob,
M. Jourdan, J. Henrizi,
J. Cramer, M. Kläui
SpinCaT
3
1. Turn spins around
2. Transport spins through space
Goal: reach speed of other information carriers, i.e. THz bandwidth
Two elementary spin operations
4
Light in fibers: >10 Tbit/s Electrons in a FET: ~1 THz cut-off
How to manipulate magnetic order ultrafast?
Spintronics and femtomagnetism
5
Spintronics: voltages in circuits Femtomagnetism: fs light pulses
100 THz 1000 THz 0.01 THz DC
Bandwidth <10 GHz
Force/torque applied field
Magnetism Roadmap 2017
Frequency ~400 THz
Force/torque light intensity
Kirilyuk, Kimel, Rasing, RevModPhys 2010
~
Terahertz gap of magnetism
1…30 THz, 4…120 meV
THz + magnetism = useful?
Why THz magnetism?
6
1) Push spintronics to THz range
Spin Hall effect, spin Seebeck effect etc.: still operative at THz frequencies?
2) New physics, new methods
THz coincides with many
fundamental modes
1 THz ≙ 4 meV
- -
+
-
+
-
Magnons Phonons
Transport
Hillenbrand et al., Nano Lett. (2008)
3) Reward for THz technology
E.g. THz sources and modulators
for spectroscopy and imaging
Need THz radiation…
not straightforward
And more:
Excitons
Cooper pairs
0.3
Duration down to 50 fs
Peak fields up to ~30 MV/cm (~10 T)
Detection of full transient field,
threshold down to 1 V/m
Ultrashort THz pulses
7 How to control/probe magnetic order by THz fields?
Tunable center frequency
0.5…50 THz, i.e. 2…200 meV
But: gaps between 5 and 15 THz
THz radiation can be generated and detected with femtosecond laser pulses
How to control spins as fast as possible?
8
Most natural stimulus: magnetic field 𝑩 𝑡
𝑩int
𝑻 = ℏ−1𝑔𝜇B𝑺 × 𝑩 𝑺
𝑬(𝑡)
THz
pulse 𝑩(𝑡)
Zeeman torque
Most natural stimulus: magnetic field 𝑩 𝑡
Most efficient coupling on resonance
Larmor frequency ℏωL = 𝑔𝜇B|𝑩int|
Ferromagnets: <10 GHz, antiferromagnets: ~1 THz
Why are the precession frequencies so different?
How to control spins as fast as possible?
9
𝑩int
𝑺
B
Ferromagnet Antiferromagnet
B B=0 B=0
Spins remain parallel
No work against exchange
interaction
Spins not antiparallel any more
Exchange interaction causes
additional repulsion
ωL ∝ 𝐵ani
Ferromagnets vs antiferromagnets
10
ωL/2𝜋 ∼ 1 THz ωL/2𝜋 ≪ 1 THz
ωL ∝ 𝐵XC𝐵ani
Conduct a THz-pump---magnetooptic-probe experiment
THz pump – magnetooptic probe
11
Sample: antiferromagnetic NiO
Neel temperature 523 K
Magnon (𝒒 = 0) at 1 THz
2𝜋/|𝒒|
∝ 𝒌 ⋅ 𝑴 𝑡
Detect Faraday rotation
Alternative: detect re-emitted
magnetic-dipole THz radiation
Yamaguchi, Suemoto et al., PRL (2010)
Arikawa, Kono et al., PRB (2011)
In the lab…
Simple THz setup in the lab
THz emitter
Pump beam: generates the THz beam
Parabolic mirror
Sample
Probe
beam
To detection of
Faraday rotation
Si
THz-induced magnon oscillation
14
Incident
magnetic pulse
Faraday response
Signature of 𝒒 = 0 magnon at 1 THz Oscillation at 1 THz, decay time ~40 ps
Driven by electric or magnetic field component?
The magnon is driven by the magnetic field
15
Driving force is magnetic
(not electric) field
Induced magnetization
driving field
NiO is centrosymmetric C = 0
No linear magnetoelectric effect
in centrosymmetric NiO
M = CE
How to model microscopically?
Microscopic description
16
==
=2
1
2
1
22
21 )(i
i
i
iyyixx tSDSDJH SBSS
Two-spin Hamiltonian: Hutchings et al., PRB (1972)
Derive/solve LLG-type
equations of motion
S1 S2
Compare to experiment
Exchange
interaction
Crystal-field and
dipolar anisotropy
Zeeman coupling
to THz pulse
Measured signal 𝜃 = 𝑺1 + 𝑺2 ⋅ 𝒌𝑑 ⋅ MO constant
Pisarev et al., JETP (1972)
𝑧
𝑩(𝑡) 𝑺2
𝑺1
THz magnetic pulse drives 𝒒 = 0 magnon
at 1 THz, induced spin deflection is 0.4
Experiment and theory
18
Quantitative agreement
incident
magnetic pulse
Faraday response
Long decay time permits THz coherent spin control
Coherent spin control with THz pulse pairs
19
Second pulse
after 6 cycles:
amplifies magnon
Second pulse
after 6.5 cycles:
switches magnon off
1 2
1 2
Summary and current work
20
Kampfrath, Sell, Wolf, Huber et al., Nature Phot. (2011)
Baierl, Huber et al., PRL (2016)
THz spin control is feasible by straightforward Zeeman torque of THz magnetic pulses
Application: use magnons as probe, e.g
of 𝐵XC𝐵ani for characterization of
antiferromagnets:
not easy with non-optical methods
with ultrafast time resolution
Review:
„Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics“
Nemec, Fiebig, Kampfrath, Kimel, ArXiv 2017
Stronger THz fields offer many more opportunities…
Nishitani, Hangyo et al., APL 2010, PRB 2012
Kanda, Kuwata-Gonokami et al., Nature Comm 2012
Nonlinear THz response
21
Electron
orbits
Ionic
lattice
Electron spins
3 MV/cm
1 T
Interesting application: reveal elementary spin couplings
Spin-electron coupling
Baierl, Mikhailovsky et al., Nature Phot. 2016
Bonetti, Dürr et al., PRL 2016
Magnon-magnon
coupling
Mukai, Hirori, Tanaka
et al., New J. Phys 2016
Lu, Suemoto, Nelson
et al., PRL 2017
Spin-phonon coupling
Kubacka, Johnson, Staub et al., Science 2014
Nova, Cavalleri et al., Nature Phys. 2016
Maehrlein et al., ArXiV 2017
What about transport?
1. Turn spins around
2. Transport of spin angular momentum
Two elementary spin operations
22
Conduction-electron
spin current
Conduction-electron
spin current
Spin wave: also possible in insulators
How to launch spin currents ultrafast?
Idea: make use of spin-Seebeck effects
The Seebeck effect
23
Metal film
- -
Thomas Seebeck (1821):
A temperature gradient drives an electron current
Ken-ichi Uchida (2008):
In ferromagnets, the Seebeck current
is spin-dependent -
Temperature
gradient
Hot Cold
Spin-dependent Seebeck effect (SDSE)
24
Uchida et al., Nature (2008)
Bauer, Saitoh, Wees, Nature Mat (2013)
and electrons have very different
transport properties
Fe film
Spin-dependent Seebeck effect (SDSE)
25
How can we induce a thermal
imbalance as fast as possible?
Uchida et al., Nature (2008)
Bauer, Saitoh, Wees, Nature Mat (2013)
Spin-polarized current
and electrons have very different
transport properties
Fe film
Temperature
gradient
Hot Cold
fs pump
pulse
Photoinduced ultrafast spin transport
26
Pump pulse excites and electrons
: d sp bands become fast
Battiato et al., PRL (2010)
Fe film
Pump launches a spin-polarized current
fs pump
pulse
Pump pulse excites and electrons
: d sp bands become fast
: d d bands stay slow
Battiato et al., PRL (2010)
How to detect the ultrafast spin current?
Could be considered as
Ultrafast SDSE Melnikov et al., PRL (2011)
Rudolf et al., NatComm (2012)
Example of spin-photogalvanic effect Ganichev et al., Nature (2002)
Photoinduced ultrafast spin transport
27
Fe film
A
Inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE)
28
Spin-orbit coupling
deflects electrons
transverse charge current
Saitoh et al., APL (2006)
fs pump
pulse
Challenge:
Electric detection has cutoff at <50 GHz
But expect bandwidth >10 THz
Heavy
metal Fe film
Inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE)
29
Emission of
electromagnetic
pulse (~1 THz)
Measure THz emission from photoexcited FM/NM bilayers
fs pump
pulse
Heavy
metal Fe film
Samples: (poly)crystalline, from labs of M. Kläui and M. Münzenberg
Pump pulses: 10 fs, 800 nm, 2.5 nJ from Ti:sapphire oscillator
Typical THz waveforms from bilayers
Consistent with scenario
SDSE + ISHE
+20 mT
-20 mT
Sig
nal (1
0-5
)
Time (ps) 0 0.5 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Fe Pt
Sig
nal (1
0-5
)
Time (ps) 0 0.5 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Fe Pt Fe
Further findings
Signal pump power
THz electric field sample magnetization
Need more evidence for the spin-Hall scenario
30
Idea:
vary nonmagnetic cap layer
Ta vs Ir:
opposite spin Hall angles, Ir larger
Ultrafast inverse spin Hall effect
2
1
0
-1
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Time t (ps)
Sig
nal (
arb
. units) The inverse
spin Hall effect is
still operative at
THz frequencies
Applications?
Kampfrath, Battiato, Oppeneer,
Freimuth, Mokrousov,
Radu, Wolf, Münzenberg et al.,
Nature Nanotech. (2013)
Fe Ir
Fe Ta
31
Estimate strength of spin Hall effect
Calculations:
F. Freimuth, S. Blügel,
Y. Mokrousov
e.g. PRL (2010)
Simple, contact-free method to obtain relative estimates of spin-Hall conductivity
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
NM material
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
Cr Pd Ta W Ir Pt Pt38Mn62
TH
z a
mplit
ude
(norm
aliz
ed
)
Calc
. spin
Hall c
onductiv
ity (1
05 S
m-1)
Fe NM
Idea: optimize Fe/Pt geometry to obtain a useful THz emitter
Need: simple model of THz emission process
32
Model of THz emission
33
Attenuation length 𝜆rel,
reflection at interfaces
FM
Fs
pump NM
THz
pulse
𝜃NM
𝑗s
𝑗c
𝐸(𝑡)
𝐼 s 𝜔 = d𝑧 𝑗 s(𝑧, 𝜔) =
Pump absorption density
(𝐴~0.5 for our films)
Ohm‘s law:
𝐸 𝜔 = 𝑍 𝜔 ⋅ 𝑒𝜃𝐼 s(𝜔)
1
𝑍 𝜔= d𝑧 𝜎 (𝑧, 𝜔)
𝑑
0
+𝑛substr + 𝑛air
𝑍0
Parallel connection of resistors
Compare to experiment
Model suggests:
Reduce film thickness 𝑍 and 𝐴/𝑑 increase 𝐸 increases
𝜆rel
FM
𝜆rel tanh𝑑NM
2𝜆rel⋅𝐴
𝑑
Optimization of the spintronic emitter
Fe Pt
Pump
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
TH
z a
mp
litu
de (
no
rma
lize
d)
25 20 15 10 5 0
Total metal thickness (nm)
Trilayers
Bilayers
Mainz (sputter) Mainz (epitaxial) Greifswald Model
THz
Simple modeling shows:
THz current flows in a thin Pt sheet of thickness 𝜆rel = 1 nm
Thinner films enhance the Fabry-Perot effect for pump and THz wave
A trilayer is even better. How does it work?
5 nm
34
THz emitter: from bilayer to trilayer
Idea: take advantage of electrons running forward and backward
W
<0
Spin
current
Pt
>0
CoFeB
Charge
current
Constructive superposition of the two spin Hall currents
70 samples later: evaluate emitter performance
Seifert, Turchinovich, Freimuth, Mokrousov, Wolf, Münzenberg, Kläui, Kampfrath et al., Nature Photon. (2016)
35
5 4 3 2 1 0
Time (ps)
4
3
2
1
0 TH
z s
ignal (
arb
. units)
Sig
nal am
plit
ude
(arb
. units) 1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
16 12 8 4 0
Frequency (THz)
ZnTe
Spintronic
emitter Spintronic
trilayer emitter
Standard emitter: ZnTe
Reststrahlen
gap
Broadband spintronic THz emitter
More broadband, efficient, cheaper, scalable than standard THz emitters
Spintronics is useful for THz photonics
Idea: upscale the emitter size
Seifert, Turchinovich, Freimuth, Mokrousov, Wolf, Münzenberg, Kläui, Kampfrath et al., Nature Photon. (2016)
36
Large-area spintronic THz emitter
Trilayer emitter
W(1.8 nm) | CoFeB (2 nm) | Pt(1.8 nm)
On fused silica (thickness 500 µm)
Pump beam
800 nm, 40 fs, 5.5 mJ, 1 kHz
Diameter on emitter: 4.8 cm (FWHIM)
One parabolic mirror
Diameter 7.6 cm
Focal length 5.1 cm
Result: intense THz pulses of 5 nJ energy, 0.3 MV cm-1 peak field Seifert et al.,
APL (2017)
What does the THz source current look like?
Outlook: ultrafast charge/spin transport
Ultrafast spin Ampere-meter
~10 fs time resolution
Contact-free
CoFeB/Pt
Rise in
~30 fs
Backflow
In metals:
Extremely fast (~30 fs) onset
of the photoinduced spin current
Magnetic insulators:
Understanding of ultrafast response Seifert et al., arXiv 1709.00768 (2017)
Braun, Münzenberg, Kampfrath et al.,
Nature Comm. (2016)
Pt Magnet
Jc
Js
10 fs
2 nJ,
1.6 eV
Curr
ent
in P
t la
yer
(arb
. untis)
Time (ps)
-1 0 1 2 -1
0
38
THz radiation is a useful tool
to reveal and control spin dynamics
Charge
Spin
THz fields can access elementary spin couplings
Spin Hall and spin Seebeck effects are operative up to 10s of THz
Studying ultrafast regime permits new insights into spin physics
and new applications in THz photonics
Summary
39 THz pulse
For more THz spin transport:
See poster of Oliver Gückstock