uncertainty reduction theory g2 comm2378
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Theories of Communications & Persuasion
Uncertainty Reduction Theory
Lecturer: Duong Trong
Hue
Group members:
Tran Nguyen Ly (s3309992)
Trieu Vi Xung (s3312602)
Table of Contents
• Historical Background
• The UCT
• Case study: KOREA vs. USA in communications
Historical Background
• First introduced in 1975
• Proposed by Charles R. Berger, professor of communication at University of California, Davis, USA
Based on the idea that:
New relationships cause uncertainty
=> Uncertainty is uncomfortable
=> People communicate to alleviate discomfort
Charles R. Berger
Activity..!! =]
Your girlfriend/boyfriend asks you
to have dinner with his/her family
at their place.
FOR THE FIRST TIME…!!
What would you do to get to know them?
YOU HAVE 2 MINUTES…!!
The strategies
Active strategy
Passive strategy
Interactive strategy
= Observe the target
= Ask others for more
information
= Talk directly to the target
Three types of solution for message receivers to reduce
uncertainty:
But how to develop a strategy…?!
The developmental phases
When there is communication between two strangers,
three phases of relations occur.
Heath & Bryant (2000)
=> The axioms of UCT
The 8 axioms
Verbal communication
Nonverbal warmth
Seeking information
Intimacy
Axiom: A self-evident truth that requires no additional proof
(Griffin 2009)
= More talking, less
uncertainty
= More ‘body language’, less
uncertainty
= More uncertainty, more info-
seeking
= More intimate, less
uncertainty
The 8 axioms
= More uncertainty, more ‘I told
you my stories, now you tell
yours’
= More similarities, less
uncertainty
= More ‘I like this guy’, less
uncertainty
= More communication networks
in common, less uncertainty
Reciprocity
Similarity
Liking
Shared networks
The theorems
From the 8 axioms, Berger formulated 28 theorems.
Theorem: A proposition that logically and necessarily follow
from two axioms(Griffin 2009)
Verbal Communication
s
Non-verbal warmt
h
Self-Disclosure
Info-Seekin
g
Reciproci
tyLiking
Similarity
Shared Network
s
Verbal Communications
+ + - - + + +
Non-verbal
warmth+ + - - + + +
Self-Disclosur
e+ + - - + + +
Info-Seeking - - - + - - -
Reciprocity - - - + - - -
Liking + + + - - + +Similarity + + + - - + +
Shared Networks + + + - - + +
Strengths & Weaknesses
• There are high level of uncertainty in interaction that no one wants to reduce.
(Miller 2005)
• Some theorems are illogical.
(Griffin 2009)
• Helpful for predict initial interaction among strangers.
HOWEVER….
CASE STUDY…!!
DICUSSION
What kind of topics would people use for
conservations when they first meet..?
Any difference between Korea and
Amercia..?!
YOU HAVE 3 MINUTES..!!
KOREA vs. USA in communications
A study was conducted using students from South Korea and the United States who were chosen to represent high- and low-
context cultures respectively
88 Korean students vs. 62 native American English speakers
To determine the kind of information they would exchange upon first meeting
someone`
Applications
• Predict initial interaction events, including intercultural
ones
• Organizational socialization
• Marketing
References:
Griffin, E 2009, ‘Uncertainty Reduction Theory’, A first look at communication theory, 7nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, pp.125-136.
Heath, RL, Bryant, J 2000, Human Communication Theory and Research: Concept, Context and Challenges, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
hkeener 2008, ‘Meet The Parents’, video recording, YouTube, 8 October, viewed 8 September, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmhGzTEGa70&feature=related>.
Kim, M, Yoon, T 1987, A Comparative Study of Uncertainty Reduction Theory in High- and Low-Context Cultures, Yonsei University, South Korea.
Laracroft 2008, Meet the Parents Poster, image, Whosdatedwho, viewed 6 September 2011, <http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_636669/meet-the-parents/poster>.
Miller, K. 2005, ‘Communication theories: Perspective, processes and contexts, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.