undergraduate architecture portfolio

28
S I T SergioIvanTaveras Undergraduate Works

Upload: sergio-taveras

Post on 29-Mar-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Undergraduate works from 2009-2012

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

S I TSergioIvanTaveras

Undergraduate Works

Page 2: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

I SEA

GR

EEN

Mer

ging

Arc

hite

ctur

e an

d N

atur

eS

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

12_3

rd y

ear

Inst

ruct

or: C

urt G

ambe

tta

HIV

E C

ITY

CO

MPE

TITI

ON

A H

oney

Bee

Hab

itat

Inde

pend

ent:

Spr

ing

2012

_3rd

yea

rTe

am: A

ndre

w D

elle

Bov

i, A

ndre

s D

e R

isio

, N

ate

Hec

kman

, Vin

cent

Rib

iero

Pla

cem

ent:

2nd

Pla

ce_R

unne

r up

THE

SHIE

LDTh

e Li

ving

Wal

lS

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

10_1

st y

ear

Inst

ruct

ors:

Chr

isto

pher

Rom

ano,

N

ick

Bru

cia,

Sha

di N

azar

ian

Team

: Reb

ecca

Bro

wer

, Nat

e H

eckm

an, F

ranz

Hei

ne,

Nic

k Lo

cice

ro, C

hris

ta T

raut

man

, Lau

ren

Wal

sh

Con

stru

ctio

n Te

chno

logy

AR

C 4

53S

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

12_3

rd y

ear

Inst

ruct

or: A

nnet

te L

ecuy

er

L.A

.S.E

.RLi

ght A

ngle

d in

Spa

ce E

nhan

cing

Ritu

alS

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

11_2

nd y

ear

Inst

ruct

or: N

erea

Fel

iz

UR

BA

N E

YES

A m

arke

t-offi

ce in

Pitt

sbur

gh, P

AS

tudi

o: F

all 2

011_

3rd

year

Inst

ruct

or: M

arth

a B

ohm

SERGIO IVAN TAVERASUniversity at Buffalo School of ArchitectureFall 2009 - Spring 2013

M.Arch 2.5 Candidate

186 Conklin AvenueWheatley Hts, NY 11798

Cell: 631.902.6839Email: [email protected]

Page 3: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

I SEA

GR

EEN

Mer

ging

Arc

hite

ctur

e an

d N

atur

eS

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

12_3

rd y

ear

Inst

ruct

or: C

urt G

ambe

tta

HIV

E C

ITY

CO

MPE

TITI

ON

A H

oney

Bee

Hab

itat

Inde

pend

ent:

Spr

ing

2012

_3rd

yea

rTe

am: A

ndre

w D

elle

Bov

i, A

ndre

s D

e R

isio

, N

ate

Hec

kman

, Vin

cent

Rib

iero

Pla

cem

ent:

2nd

Pla

ce_R

unne

r up

THE

SHIE

LDTh

e Li

ving

Wal

lS

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

10_1

st y

ear

Inst

ruct

ors:

Chr

isto

pher

Rom

ano,

N

ick

Bru

cia,

Sha

di N

azar

ian

Team

: Reb

ecca

Bro

wer

, Nat

e H

eckm

an, F

ranz

Hei

ne,

Nic

k Lo

cice

ro, C

hris

ta T

raut

man

, Lau

ren

Wal

sh

Con

stru

ctio

n Te

chno

logy

AR

C 4

53S

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

12_3

rd y

ear

Inst

ruct

or: A

nnet

te L

ecuy

er

L.A

.S.E

.RLi

ght A

ngle

d in

Spa

ce E

nhan

cing

Ritu

alS

tudi

o: S

prin

g 20

11_2

nd y

ear

Inst

ruct

or: N

erea

Fel

iz

UR

BA

N E

YES

A m

arke

t-offi

ce in

Pitt

sbur

gh, P

AS

tudi

o: F

all 2

011_

3rd

year

Inst

ruct

or: M

arth

a B

ohm

SERGIO IVAN TAVERASUniversity at Buffalo School of ArchitectureFall 2009 - Spring 2013

M.Arch 2.5 Candidate

186 Conklin AvenueWheatley Hts, NY 11798

Cell: 631.902.6839Email: [email protected]

Page 4: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

The botanical gardens project was designed as an addition to the existing Buffalo and Erie county gardens located in Lackawanna, Buffalo. The Design allows the building to merge with the existing site making nature an integral part of the architecture,

and architecture an integral part of nature. The architecture conveys a topographical persona, which helps to better clarify the buildings weaving with the site. The use of glass and layers of transparency was crucial to emphasize a visual connection between spaces.

The design incorporates an accesible roof providing the opportunity to exhibit the gardens from a heigher view. Circulation weaves around exhibitions and the demo garden from three different directions allowing visitor to experience the gardens from many perspectives.

VIEW OF ORANGERIE EXTERIOR ROOF GARDEN

extending the site multiple views peaks and valleys to account for plant heights and for roof access

visitors circulating the roofMERGING ARCHITECTURE

AND NATURE

I S

EA

GR

EE

N

Page 5: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

The botanical gardens project was designed as an addition to the existing Buffalo and Erie county gardens located in Lackawanna, Buffalo. The Design allows the building to merge with the existing site making nature an integral part of the architecture,

and architecture an integral part of nature. The architecture conveys a topographical persona, which helps to better clarify the buildings weaving with the site. The use of glass and layers of transparency was crucial to emphasize a visual connection between spaces.

The design incorporates an accesible roof providing the opportunity to exhibit the gardens from a heigher view. Circulation weaves around exhibitions and the demo garden from three different directions allowing visitor to experience the gardens from many perspectives.

VIEW OF ORANGERIE EXTERIOR ROOF GARDEN

extending the site multiple views peaks and valleys to account for plant heights and for roof access

visitors circulating the roofMERGING ARCHITECTURE

AND NATURE

I S

EA

GR

EE

N

Page 6: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

I SEA GREEN PROCESS FORM WORKIt was crucial that the design embodied a form that created opportunities for roof access from the site, as well as maximizing views and circulation ability. The design process began with simple diagrams highlighting the existing conditions, followed by a proposed concept diagram. Decision on a radial plan was made to maximize views to the park. This was then followed by a three-dimensional process to alter the circle, creating moments where it peaks, and moments where it is easily accessible from the ground. Columns were designed to help structure the peaks. The design of the column introduced a sliding glass mechanic to create openings for ventilation and to introduce an agitated interior environment; like that of nature. Layers of transparency was used to continue the visual connection of spaces.

Existing condition:

Spaces portray a disconnect from each other as one travels from room to room.The circulation is very linear

Proposed scheme:

Allows for more views, multiple circulation paths and a visual connection between spaces throughout the Gardens

Column section showing the sliding glass openings, as well as its ability to capture water and ventilate.

site radial form to increase views and loop circulation

extrusion for different heights to accommodate spaces the roof now becomes part of the landscape

excavation and creation of slopes and levels, in response to the access points of the roof

final form with contours to show heightslinks to the lake, park/golf course, and urban context

push down at these points to make roof accessible from the park. circle cut to make courtyard space

Page 7: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

I SEA GREEN PROCESS FORM WORKIt was crucial that the design embodied a form that created opportunities for roof access from the site, as well as maximizing views and circulation ability. The design process began with simple diagrams highlighting the existing conditions, followed by a proposed concept diagram. Decision on a radial plan was made to maximize views to the park. This was then followed by a three-dimensional process to alter the circle, creating moments where it peaks, and moments where it is easily accessible from the ground. Columns were designed to help structure the peaks. The design of the column introduced a sliding glass mechanic to create openings for ventilation and to introduce an agitated interior environment; like that of nature. Layers of transparency was used to continue the visual connection of spaces.

Existing condition:

Spaces portray a disconnect from each other as one travels from room to room.The circulation is very linear

Proposed scheme:

Allows for more views, multiple circulation paths and a visual connection between spaces throughout the Gardens

Column section showing the sliding glass openings, as well as its ability to capture water and ventilate.

site radial form to increase views and loop circulation

extrusion for different heights to accommodate spaces the roof now becomes part of the landscape

excavation and creation of slopes and levels, in response to the access points of the roof

final form with contours to show heightslinks to the lake, park/golf course, and urban context

push down at these points to make roof accessible from the park. circle cut to make courtyard space

Page 8: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio
Page 9: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio
Page 10: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio
Page 11: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio
Page 12: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Open Plan layout

Closed-Plan layout

Physical Model

MARKET

office

15,000 sq ft.

20,000sq ft.1/3 site

MARKET

office

OFFICE OFFICE

MARKET MARKET

GREEN SPACE

GREEN SPACESOCIAL CIRCULATION

Programming Diagram

LOBBY

Perspective Section

Page 13: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Open Plan layout

Closed-Plan layout

Physical Model

MARKET

office

15,000 sq ft.

20,000sq ft.1/3 site

MARKET

office

OFFICE OFFICE

MARKET MARKET

GREEN SPACE

GREEN SPACESOCIAL CIRCULATION

Programming Diagram

LOBBY

Perspective Section

Page 14: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

MOSQUE COMPLEXL.A.S.E.R L.A.S.E.R mosque utilizes key concepts derived from the society of rooms study and the geneology research of historic mosque types. Through the society of rooms studies, the concept of bouncing light into a space through the use of reflective planes is used. Another key concept is the simplicity to complexity from ground to sky; derived from the mosque typology research. The design utilizes ideal angles in order to reflect the most light into the building. Design elements guide users to the building through ramps and views. The complex takes advantage of the drastic slope of the site, by using it to carve out specific angles to maximize light reflections.

Longitudinal Section

Site Plan

Light. Angled in. Space. Enhancing. Ritual

Page 15: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

MOSQUE COMPLEXL.A.S.E.R L.A.S.E.R mosque utilizes key concepts derived from the society of rooms study and the geneology research of historic mosque types. Through the society of rooms studies, the concept of bouncing light into a space through the use of reflective planes is used. Another key concept is the simplicity to complexity from ground to sky; derived from the mosque typology research. The design utilizes ideal angles in order to reflect the most light into the building. Design elements guide users to the building through ramps and views. The complex takes advantage of the drastic slope of the site, by using it to carve out specific angles to maximize light reflections.

Longitudinal Section

Site Plan

Light. Angled in. Space. Enhancing. Ritual

Page 16: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

H

So

Se

R

This society of rooms looked at ideas of reflectivity and connections between rooms. A laser was brought into play to analyze the bouncing of light between rooms, and to highlight the amount of bounces in each. The light began at a single point in space, and was reflected all the way through the project into the largest room, thus creating a beamed path for the user. These ideas then influenced the L.A.S.E.R mosque.

The research focuses on three mosque conditions that are categorized as archi-tectural, atmospherical, and cultural. Looking at these specific conditions closely a mosque typology is created. From the mosque typology there was a discovery in the transition of patterns from ground to sky. The typology can then be defined as a change from simplicity to complexity, vertically.

Mos

t Suc

cess

ful

Lea

st S

ucce

ssfu

l

Rustem Mosque

Sehzade Mosque

Hagia Sophia

Sokullu Mosque

H

Se

So

R

Rug Pattern Simplicity

Window Pattern Transitional

Dome Mosaic Complexity

Room 1: Single Bounce

Society of Rooms: Physical Model

Mosque Typology

Room 2: A couple Bounces

Room 3: Multiple Bounces

Room 4: Infinite Bounces

Page 17: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

H

So

Se

R

This society of rooms looked at ideas of reflectivity and connections between rooms. A laser was brought into play to analyze the bouncing of light between rooms, and to highlight the amount of bounces in each. The light began at a single point in space, and was reflected all the way through the project into the largest room, thus creating a beamed path for the user. These ideas then influenced the L.A.S.E.R mosque.

The research focuses on three mosque conditions that are categorized as archi-tectural, atmospherical, and cultural. Looking at these specific conditions closely a mosque typology is created. From the mosque typology there was a discovery in the transition of patterns from ground to sky. The typology can then be defined as a change from simplicity to complexity, vertically.

Mos

t Suc

cess

ful

Lea

st S

ucce

ssfu

l

Rustem Mosque

Sehzade Mosque

Hagia Sophia

Sokullu Mosque

H

Se

So

R

Rug Pattern Simplicity

Window Pattern Transitional

Dome Mosaic Complexity

Room 1: Single Bounce

Society of Rooms: Physical Model

Mosque Typology

Room 2: A couple Bounces

Room 3: Multiple Bounces

Room 4: Infinite Bounces

Page 18: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Simplicity

Transitional

Complexity

RENDERINGS

MODEL MODEL

MODEL

L.A.S.E.R Mosque

Page 19: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Simplicity

Transitional

Complexity

RENDERINGS

MODEL MODEL

MODEL

L.A.S.E.R Mosque

Page 20: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Outline Specifications

1. Foundation for perimeter wall36 inch wide x 12 inch thick continuous site cast concrete strip footing with 2 # 8 reinforcement bars.

2. West External wall below gradeVapor barrier 8 x 16 x 8 CMU inner wythe with 3 #5 vertical reinforcement bars at corners, openings at 48 inches o.c, 8 x 16 x 8 outer wythe

3. North External wall below gradeVapor barrier 12 x 16 x 8 CMU inner wythe with 3 #5 vertical reinforcement bars at corners, 8 x 16 x 8 CMU outer wythe

4. External wall at ground levelThru wall flashing continuous

5. External wall at upper level8 x 16 x 8 CMU inner wythe with 3 #5 vertical reinforcement bars at corners, openings at 48 inches o.c. and horizontal joint reinforcement every 16 inches o.c. 2 inches rigid insulation2 inch cavity8 x 8 x 4 CMU

6. Ground Floor2 inches compacted sand fillvapor barrier4 inch site cast concrete slab on grade with mesh reinforcement

7. Lower Level Ceilinginch plywood sheathing2 x 10 joists at 16 inches o.c.inch plywood subfloorinch wood strip finish flooring

8. Roof2 x 8 joists at 16 inches o.c.5/8 inch plywood sheathingvapor barrierbuilt up roof membrane ceilinginch plywood sheathing2 x 4 joists at 16 inches o.c. batt insulation between gypsum board

9. West window at ground levelsite cast concrete sillsteel framed double glazed windows

10. Large west window to living roomsite cast concrete sill8 inch 2 course bond beam lintel inner wythe with 4 #5 reinforcement bars 8 inch bond beam lintel outer wythe with 2 #5 reinforcement barssteel framed double glazed windows

11. Large North window to living roomsite cast concrete sill8 inch 2 course bond beam lintel inner wythe with 4 #5 reinforcement bars8 inch bond beam lintel outer wythe with 2 #5 reinforcement barssteel framed double glazed windows

Outline Specifications

Substructure1 FoundationExisting concrete wallExisting concrete piles and pilecapsSuperstructure2 Steel ColumnsW14x30 steel columns

3 Lower Floor Slab

Prepared subgradeGranular fillVapor barrier2 feet of R-10 rigid insulation on perimeter6 ½ inch structural concrete slab on grade

4 Main Floor

2 inch topping slab with broom finish1 inch rigid insulationDrainage compositeProtection SheetAsphaltic membrane2 ½ inch concrete topping slab2 inch composite metal deckingExisting steel structureR-14 insulation finish board

5 Ceiling 1Exposed structureFinish board insulationPaint

6 Ceiling 2Exposed wood deckingStainExposed W24 (MF)Exposed W16x36

7 Roof2 x 6 P.T. NailerT&G Wood DeckingPlywood SheathingVapor barrierR-21 rigid insulation¼ inch overlayment boardSingle ply PVC membrane

8 External WallCast in place concrete panelsR-11 batt insulation3 5/8 inch metal studs at 24 inches OC5/8 inch hi-impact gypsum wall board

9 Garage Door12 feet x 11 feet Glazed panelsTracking

10 Curtain Wall9” Curtain Wall Assembly11 Exterior Louver System 1

CO

NST

RU

CTI

ON

TECH

NOLO

GYCroffead Residence

University of Washington Conibear Shellhouse

Clark and Menefee Architects

The Miller Hull Partnership

Page 21: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Outline Specifications

1. Foundation for perimeter wall36 inch wide x 12 inch thick continuous site cast concrete strip footing with 2 # 8 reinforcement bars.

2. West External wall below gradeVapor barrier 8 x 16 x 8 CMU inner wythe with 3 #5 vertical reinforcement bars at corners, openings at 48 inches o.c, 8 x 16 x 8 outer wythe

3. North External wall below gradeVapor barrier 12 x 16 x 8 CMU inner wythe with 3 #5 vertical reinforcement bars at corners, 8 x 16 x 8 CMU outer wythe

4. External wall at ground levelThru wall flashing continuous

5. External wall at upper level8 x 16 x 8 CMU inner wythe with 3 #5 vertical reinforcement bars at corners, openings at 48 inches o.c. and horizontal joint reinforcement every 16 inches o.c. 2 inches rigid insulation2 inch cavity8 x 8 x 4 CMU

6. Ground Floor2 inches compacted sand fillvapor barrier4 inch site cast concrete slab on grade with mesh reinforcement

7. Lower Level Ceilinginch plywood sheathing2 x 10 joists at 16 inches o.c.inch plywood subfloorinch wood strip finish flooring

8. Roof2 x 8 joists at 16 inches o.c.5/8 inch plywood sheathingvapor barrierbuilt up roof membrane ceilinginch plywood sheathing2 x 4 joists at 16 inches o.c. batt insulation between gypsum board

9. West window at ground levelsite cast concrete sillsteel framed double glazed windows

10. Large west window to living roomsite cast concrete sill8 inch 2 course bond beam lintel inner wythe with 4 #5 reinforcement bars 8 inch bond beam lintel outer wythe with 2 #5 reinforcement barssteel framed double glazed windows

11. Large North window to living roomsite cast concrete sill8 inch 2 course bond beam lintel inner wythe with 4 #5 reinforcement bars8 inch bond beam lintel outer wythe with 2 #5 reinforcement barssteel framed double glazed windows

Outline Specifications

Substructure1 FoundationExisting concrete wallExisting concrete piles and pilecapsSuperstructure2 Steel ColumnsW14x30 steel columns

3 Lower Floor Slab

Prepared subgradeGranular fillVapor barrier2 feet of R-10 rigid insulation on perimeter6 ½ inch structural concrete slab on grade

4 Main Floor

2 inch topping slab with broom finish1 inch rigid insulationDrainage compositeProtection SheetAsphaltic membrane2 ½ inch concrete topping slab2 inch composite metal deckingExisting steel structureR-14 insulation finish board

5 Ceiling 1Exposed structureFinish board insulationPaint

6 Ceiling 2Exposed wood deckingStainExposed W24 (MF)Exposed W16x36

7 Roof2 x 6 P.T. NailerT&G Wood DeckingPlywood SheathingVapor barrierR-21 rigid insulation¼ inch overlayment boardSingle ply PVC membrane

8 External WallCast in place concrete panelsR-11 batt insulation3 5/8 inch metal studs at 24 inches OC5/8 inch hi-impact gypsum wall board

9 Garage Door12 feet x 11 feet Glazed panelsTracking

10 Curtain Wall9” Curtain Wall Assembly11 Exterior Louver System 1

CO

NST

RU

CTI

ON

TECH

NOLO

GY

Croffead Residence

University of Washington Conibear Shellhouse

Clark and Menefee Architects

The Miller Hull Partnership

Page 22: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

THE

LIV

ING

WA

LLT

HE

SH

IEL

D All projects began with a solid volume of blue foam measuring 6'x6'x8' (1"=1'-0" scale).

Volumes were cut, shifted, and rotated to provide an area for entry, internal circulation, and sleeping areas for 3-7 people. Final models for this phase were the result of a translation from solid to planar materials allowing the massing studies to become inhabitable while maintaining their volumetric identities.

Formal Shifts

Elevation Section

Sliding Modules Exploded Axo

Page 23: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

THE

LIV

ING

WA

LLT

HE

SH

IEL

D All projects began with a solid volume of blue foam measuring 6'x6'x8' (1"=1'-0" scale).

Volumes were cut, shifted, and rotated to provide an area for entry, internal circulation, and sleeping areas for 3-7 people. Final models for this phase were the result of a translation from solid to planar materials allowing the massing studies to become inhabitable while maintaining their volumetric identities.

Formal Shifts

Elevation Section

Sliding Modules Exploded Axo

Page 24: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Plan

Longitudinal Section Roof Plans

Shield Module Sequence

THE SHIELD accommodates sleeping areas for each group member comfortably, and then some. Through these ideal shifts, 9 sleeping spaces are accounted for. The shifts not only create a comfortable social area for the users, but distri-bution of private and public zones. Expanding on this idea of private versus public, through the cladding we can highlight whats meant for public and whats meant for private. Private zones contain the cladding on the outside exposing the structure, while public zones contain the cladding on the inside hiding the structure. As seen in the sequential images, we developed a system in which certain modules slide into place to allow for an easier assembly. In total the project consists of 6 modules, and 3 of these slide into place. THE SHIELD does a very good job of giving the users a comfortable, fairly private space, but at the same time allows the users to interact with their neighbors, through the parti-wall conditions.

Construction

Page 25: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

Plan

Longitudinal Section Roof Plans

Shield Module Sequence

THE SHIELD accommodates sleeping areas for each group member comfortably, and then some. Through these ideal shifts, 9 sleeping spaces are accounted for. The shifts not only create a comfortable social area for the users, but distri-bution of private and public zones. Expanding on this idea of private versus public, through the cladding we can highlight whats meant for public and whats meant for private. Private zones contain the cladding on the outside exposing the structure, while public zones contain the cladding on the inside hiding the structure. As seen in the sequential images, we developed a system in which certain modules slide into place to allow for an easier assembly. In total the project consists of 6 modules, and 3 of these slide into place. THE SHIELD does a very good job of giving the users a comfortable, fairly private space, but at the same time allows the users to interact with their neighbors, through the parti-wall conditions.

Construction

Page 26: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

HIVE CITY student competition

Information and Registration

Meeting: February 3, 2012 5:30 PM Crosby 301

Register, learn about Silo City, and learn why bees are important

.

Phase 1: SiloCity and Rigidized Metals are sponsoring the development and construction of a new home for the hive currently located in the SiloCity offi

ce building.

Working in teams, students of the UB School of Architecture and Planning will have 24 hours to develop a proposal for a new home for the hive. Shortlisted proposals will move to Phase 2 of the competition.

Presentation Requirements:1 Board 24”x36” [mounted]

Phase 2: Winning projects will be announced February 5th. Three winning teams will have the opportunity to develop their proposals. To ensure the technical and biological success of the proposals, the competition organizers will facilitate consultation with fabrication and bee-keeping experts, and the sponsor will provide a stipend for the production of models and drawings.

Winning proposal

will be constructed at SiloCity Summer of 2012.

Phase 1 Charette February 4-5

Organized by the Ecological Practices Graduate Research Group

D

B

A

C

3”=1’

1 2 4

HIVE CITY A HONEY BEE HABITAT Using the simple shape of the elevators, we can produce forms that connect with the visitors, as well as with the bees, surrounding parks, nature, and solar patterns. We can trace out ideal forms that are best suited for the life of bees which will give visitors the ability to connect to different generations of architectural sculptures.

Hive city is a student based competition geared towards the design of a bee hive, which would be the first addition to a master plan for a public park. The project consisted of several phases in which students would develop the project in more detail leading to the final phase, which is construction. Our design, Honey Elevator, takes on the shape of an elegant tilted arch acting as a gateway to a future park.

Plan

People

Wind

Solar Movement

Sections

Detail Section

Axonometric Renders

Page 27: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

HIVE CITY student competition

Information and Registration

Meeting: February 3, 2012 5:30 PM Crosby 301

Register, learn about Silo City, and learn why bees are important

.

Phase 1: SiloCity and Rigidized Metals are sponsoring the development and construction of a new home for the hive currently located in the SiloCity offi

ce building.

Working in teams, students of the UB School of Architecture and Planning will have 24 hours to develop a proposal for a new home for the hive. Shortlisted proposals will move to Phase 2 of the competition.

Presentation Requirements:1 Board 24”x36” [mounted]

Phase 2: Winning projects will be announced February 5th. Three winning teams will have the opportunity to develop their proposals. To ensure the technical and biological success of the proposals, the competition organizers will facilitate consultation with fabrication and bee-keeping experts, and the sponsor will provide a stipend for the production of models and drawings.

Winning proposal

will be constructed at SiloCity Summer of 2012.

Phase 1 Charette February 4-5

Organized by the Ecological Practices Graduate Research Group

D

B

A

C

3”=1’

1 2 4

HIVE CITY A HONEY BEE HABITAT Using the simple shape of the elevators, we can produce forms that connect with the visitors, as well as with the bees, surrounding parks, nature, and solar patterns. We can trace out ideal forms that are best suited for the life of bees which will give visitors the ability to connect to different generations of architectural sculptures.

Hive city is a student based competition geared towards the design of a bee hive, which would be the first addition to a master plan for a public park. The project consisted of several phases in which students would develop the project in more detail leading to the final phase, which is construction. Our design, Honey Elevator, takes on the shape of an elegant tilted arch acting as a gateway to a future park.

Plan

People

Wind

Solar Movement

Sections

Detail Section

Axonometric Renders

Page 28: Undergraduate Architecture Portfolio

“Like superheroes, Architects can see through walls and imagine another spatial reality”

_UNKNOWN