understory invasion by acacia longifolia alters the water ...€¦ · tem structure and function...
TRANSCRIPT
Understory Invasion by Acacialongifolia Alters the Water Balance
and Carbon Gain of a MediterraneanPine Forest
Katherine G. Rascher,1* Andre Große-Stoltenberg,2 Cristina Maguas,3
and Christiane Werner1
1Experimental and Systems Ecology, University of Bielefeld, Universitatstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany; 2Institute of LandscapeEcology, University of Munster, Munster, Germany; 3Centre for Environmental Biology (CBA), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
ABSTRACT
In water-limited ecosystems, where potential
evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation, it is of-
ten assumed that plant invasions will not increase
total ecosystem water use, because all available
water is evaporated or transpired regardless of
vegetation type. However, invasion by exotic
species, with high water use rates, may potentially
alter ecosystem water balance by reducing water
available to native species, which may in turn
impact carbon assimilation and productivity of co-
occurring species. Here, we document the impact
of invasion by an understory exotic woody species
(Acacia longifolia) in a semi-arid Mediterranean
dune pine forest. To quantify the effects of this
understory leguminous tree on the water use and
carbon fixation rates of Pinus pinaster we compare
an invaded and a non-invaded stand. A. longifolia
significantly altered forest structure by increasing
plant density and leaf area index in the mid-stratum
of the invaded forest. A. longifolia contributed sig-
nificantly to transpiration in the invaded forest (up
to 42%) resulting in a slight increase in stand tran-
spiration in the invaded relative to non-invaded
forest. More importantly, both water use and carbon
assimilation rates of P. pinaster were significantly
reduced in the invaded relative to non-invaded
stand. Therefore, this study shows that exotic plant
invasions can have significant impacts on hydro-
logical and carbon cycling even in water-limited
semi-arid ecosystems through a repartitioning of
water resources between the native and the invasive
species.
Key words: competition; delta 13-C; ecohydrol-
ogy; invasion ecology; Mediterranean; nitrogen;
Pinus pinaster; sap flux; transpiration; water cycle.
INTRODUCTION
Due to the interdependence between water cycling
and the structural and functional attributes of
biological communities, vegetation plays a major
role in shaping the terrestrial water balance (Vert-
essy and others 2001; Ewers and others 2002, 2005;
Moore and others 2004; Newman and others 2006;
Wilcox and Thurow 2006; Kagawa and others
Received 18 January 2011; accepted 11 May 2011
Author Contributions: KGR, CW, and CM conceived of and designed
the study. KGR and AGS performed research. KGR analyzed data. KGR
wrote the paper with assistance from CW.
*Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]
EcosystemsDOI: 10.1007/s10021-011-9453-7
� 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
2009). However, predicting the impact of vegeta-
tion change on the hydrologic cycle is not
straightforward, due to complex interactions and
feedbacks between the vegetation functioning (for
example, ecological strategy, water use efficiency,
phenology) and the abiotic characteristics of eco-
systems (for example, precipitation regime,
groundwater depth). Furthermore, in arid and
semi-arid ecosystems, vegetation cover often has
little impact on total evapotranspiration because
the available water is fully evaporated or transpired
regardless of vegetation type (Huxman and others
2005; Wilcox and others 2006; Brauman and oth-
ers 2007). Specifically, in Mediterranean climates,
the presence of woody shrubs in grasslands has
been shown to effect ecosystem water storage only
during winter when precipitation exceeds potential
evapotranspiration (Huxman and others 2005).
Woody invasive plants have the potential to
seriously disrupt water and nutrient cycling. Many
exotic woody invasives are fast-growing plants
with high transpiration rates which can lead to
decreased water storage (for example, streamflow,
groundwater recharge) in invaded communities
(Brauman and others 2007). Furthermore, in arid
ecosystems, native species are adapted to water-
limited conditions (either through dry season
senescence or efficient control of water loss, for
example, Werner and others 1999) whereas
invaders may lack those traits, thus leading to
greater water use in invaded relative to non-
invaded habitat (Fritzsche and others 2006; Brau-
man and others 2007). Phenology of invaders may
also be out of phase with the native species,
potentially resulting in the extraction of soil water
and nutrients at different times than native species
(Prater and DeLucia 2006).
Although there have been many studies of
woody exotic plant invasions in semi-arid riparian
zones (for example, Calder and Dye 2001; Shafroth
and others 2005; Cleverly and others 2006; Wilcox
and Thurow 2006) studies of woody exotic plant
invasions in non-riparian semi-arid systems are
lacking (but see Calder and Dye 2001). In addition,
the impact of plant invasions on water cycling has
typically been studied at the leaf-level and com-
parisons between invasive and native species at the
stand-level are scarce (Cavaleri and Sack 2010).
Invasive species do not always out-compete native
species to dominate ecosystems. In fact, they often
co-exist in the understory or as mixed stands
(Cleverly and others 2006; Rascher and others
2011). In fact, there is little evidence that plant
invasions have caused plant extinctions at the
population level (Sax and Gaines 2008); however,
invasion by species with novel life-forms like trees
in tree-less habitats can substantially alter ecosys-
tem structure and function (Jaeger and others
2009: Rascher and others 2011). To our knowledge,
the hydrologic impact of an understory invader in a
semi-arid Mediterranean forest has yet to be
examined. Furthermore, impacts of plant invasions
on the hydrologic cycle will also affect carbon
assimilation and wood production because water
availability determines growth rates, vegetation
structure, and light interception as well as playing a
role in determining photosynthetic efficiency
(Ryan and others 2010).
In this study, we investigated the impact of an
exotic understory invasive tree, Acacia longifolia, on
the ecosystem water balance and carbon fixation
rates of a Mediterranean dune Pinus pinaster forest.
A. longifolia is native to relatively mesic habitats
with annual rainfall between 800 and 1600 mm
(Benson and McDougall 1996) in Australia and is a
typical tree in the understory of forests (Neave and
Norton 1998), especially in coastal sand dune eco-
systems (Ross and others 2004). Previous studies
have shown that A. longifolia is a strong competitor
with Portuguese dune species under a range of
water availabilities (Peperkorn and others 2005;
Werner and others 2010). On the other hand, the
atmospheric N2 fixed by A. longifolia is available to
and can have a facilitative effect on neighboring
native species (Hellmann and others 2011). Rec-
ognizing that interactions between abiotic site
attributes (for example, temperature and precipi-
tation regimes) and functional characteristics of the
vegetation (phenology, photosynthetic regulation,
water use efficiency) interact, our study encom-
passed all four seasons to determine the impact of
A. longifolia invasion on the hydrologic and carbon
cycles. We hypothesized that A. longifolia would
have a negative competitive effect on the water
status of co-occurring P. pinaster. However, we also
expected that the competitive strength of A. longi-
folia on P. pinaster would vary depending on
environmental conditions (for example, water
availability).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Site Description
The study was conducted in a Pinus pinaster planta-
tion forest in Pinheiro da Cruz, Portugal (38�15¢ N,
8�46¢ W) approximately 70 km south of Lisbon. The
plantation forest contained approximately 35-year-
old P. pinaster trees growing in sandy soils (orthic
podzols) with an average height of 12.6 m ± 2.2
K. G. Rascher and others
(mean ± SD) and diameter at 1.4 m of 25.2 cm ±
5.8. The invasive A. longifolia forms a dense under-
story population (8706 individuals ha-1) with an
average tree height of 3.2 m ± 1.3 and diameter at
ground level of 3.1 cm ± 1.8. The study area
encompassed a 1000 m2 area (50 m 9 24 m) of the
plantation (half heavily invaded by A. longifolia and
half largely non-invaded—a 50 9 4 m2 wide fire-
break through the middle of the plot was excluded
from measurement). This ensured that the study
area was small enough to guarantee a uniform
site history (for example, disturbance from logging
and the same planting history) and homogenous
microclimate conditions. Furthermore, this fire-
break may have served to slow the progression of
A. longifolia population expansion; however, iso-
lated A. longifolia saplings were found in the ‘‘non-
invaded’’ forest indicating that the invasion is likely
to expand in the near future. For further site details
see Rascher and others (2010, 2011).
Climate
Microclimate parameters were measured either in
the forest or in an open area adjacent to the field
site. Microclimate data were collected from October
1, 2007 to August 15, 2008. Sensors were read
every 60 s and 15 or 60 min averages stored in data
loggers (CR1000, CR10X, Campbell Scientific,
Utah, USA). In the forest, air temperature and
relative humidity (CS-215, Campbell Scientific),
soil temperature (T107, Campbell Scientific) and
soil moisture were monitored. Soil moisture (vol-
umetric water content, VWC) was measured at 10–
20-, 20–30-, 30–40-, and 40–50-cm depths using
ECH2O EC-10 probes (Decagon, USA) with a cali-
bration equation specific to the site. VWC was
monitored in the invaded (2 sensors per depth),
non-invaded forest (2 sensors per depth), and open
sand (1 sensor per depth). Leaf to air vapor pressure
deficit (VPD) was calculated from temperature and
relative humidity data using the Goff-Gratch for-
mula. In an open area adjacent to the field site,
photosynthetic photon flux density (LI-190SB, LI-
COR, Nebraska, USA) and rainfall (ARG100 tipping
bucket rain gauge, Campbell Scientific) were
measured.
Sap Flow Measurements
Sap flow was monitored from October 1, 2007 to
July 31, 2008 in P. pinaster and A. longifolia trees
using Granier’s constant heat method (1985). Due
to power supply failure data are missing from
December 18 to 22, 2007 and January 5 to 11,
2008. Sensor pairs (UP-GmbH, Germany) were
installed at breast height in P. pinaster and between
0.3 and 1 m for A. longifolia (below the first live
branch). Sensors were read every 60 s and data
stored as 15-min means in a data logger (CR1000 &
AM16/32 multiplexers, Campbell Scientific). Five
invaded P. pinaster, five non-invaded P. pinaster,
and ten A. longifolia individuals were equipped for
sapflow. The diameter at breast height of P. pinaster
trees equipped for sapflow ranged from 18.3 to
26.4 cm in the non-invaded forest and 18.8 to
27.4 cm in the invaded forest. The A. longifolia used
for sapflow measurements ranged in diameter from
5.4 to 11.2 cm at sensor height. To avoid artifacts
introduced when individual sensors failed, data
were gap filled using linear relationships developed
when all sensors were functioning.
Sap flow terminology follows Edwards and others
(1997). Sap flux density, t (m3 m-2 15 min-1),
was calculated from the temperature difference
between the up- and the down-stream thermo-
couple every 15 min using the empirical relation-
ship developed by Granier (1985):
t ¼ 7:14k1:231 � 15
where
k ¼ dTMax
dT
� �� 1
and dTMax is the maximum daily temperature dif-
ference between the up- and the down-stream
thermocouples and dT is the current temperature
difference. Sapwood area-related sap flux density,
QS, is reported as daily values (m3 m-2 d-1) which
were calculated by summing t from 9:00 to 21:00.
To account for variation in sapflow with depth in
the xylem of P. pinaster three pairs of different
length sensors were installed covering 0–2-, 2–4-,
and 4–6-cm depths. For A. longifolia, sap flow was
measured in the outer 2 cm of xylem, and cir-
cumferential variability was accounted for by
installing two sensor pairs (in north and south
facing sides of the tree) and the mean of the two
sensor sets was used. All trees were insulated with
plastic bubble wrap and covered with a reflective
white plastic to minimize temperature gradients
caused by sunlight.
Sap Flow Scaling
Tree cores were taken at breast height in 21
P. pinaster trees growing just outside the study site.
Estimates of sapwood depth were made after the
cores were dried (heartwood distinguished by its
dark, reddish color: Delzon and others 2004; Pinto
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
and others 2004). The relationship between sap-
wood depth and tree radius at breast height was
determined and used to estimate depth of sapwood
and the sapwood area covered by each of the three
different length sap flow sensors. In cases in which
a tree had sapwood deeper than 6 cm the sap flux
density measured in the inner most xylem ring
(4–6 cm) was applied to all sapwood deeper than
6 cm.
Sapwood area per ground area was determined
by calculating tree radius from measurements of
circumference at breast height of all P. pinaster
individuals in the study site and applying the
relationship between sapwood depth and radius
to determine the sapwood area to ground area
ratio (AS:AG; m2 sapwood m-2 stand ground area)
separately for the invaded and the non-invaded
P. pinaster stands. For A. longifolia the diameter at
ground level was measured for all individuals in a
170 m2 subarea of the invaded forest and AS:AG
was calculated analogously assuming that sap-
wood was 2-cm deep for all Acacia trees. Studies
in other Acacia species have indicated a mean
sapwood depth of 25 mm (A. dealbata: Hunt and
Beadle 1998). Even if the true sapwood area
extended deeper than 2 cm only a small under-
estimate of stand level sap flux rates would occur
because 79% of the A. longifolia trees growing in
the stand had radii less than or equal to 2 cm.
Stand transpiration on a ground area basis
(m3 m-2 d-1) was calculated by multiplying daily
average QS by the corresponding AS:AG.
Determination of Vegetation Structure
The 1000 m2 study area was divided into 100
subplots (2 m 9 5 m = 10 m2) and vegetation
structure was characterized systematically in every
third subplot in fall 2007. Vegetation was subdi-
vided into two height strata: (1) adult plants taller
than 1.5 m, and (2) plants shorter than 1.5 m
(encompassing adult shrubs and juveniles of woody
species). Height to the nearest 0.5 m was measured
for plants taller than 1.5 m and plants shorter than
1.5 m were classified into height classes: 0–10, 11–
25, 26–50, 51–100, and 101–150 cm. Crown
diameter was calculated as the arithmetic mean of
the north–south and east–west diameters (mea-
sured to the nearest 5 cm). Canopy cover was then
calculated as the sum of the projected crown area
(calculated from crown diameter). More details
regarding vegetation structure can be found in
Rascher and others (2011).
Hemispherical Photographs and LeafArea Index Measurements
Hemispherical photographs (at three exposures:
-1.3, 0, and 1.3) were taken at dusk or dawn in the
center of each subplot used for vegetation structure
measurements using a Nikon Coolpix 950 camera
and a Nikon FC-E8 fish-eye lens. Photographs were
taken at the end of September 2007. Leaf area
index (LAI), transmitted gap light, and canopy
openness were calculated from the photograph
with the best contrast using Gap Light Analyzer 2.0
software (Frazer and others 1999).
Foliar Carbon, Nitrogen, and XylemWater Potential
Young, fully expanded, sun exposed foliage was
collected seasonally (fall: September 23, 2007;
winter: January 13, 2008; spring: May 7, 2008;
summer: August 7, 2008), oven-dried at 65�C for
48 h and ground into a fine powder with a ball mill
(Retsch, Haan, Germany) for analyses of nitrogen
content and carbon isotope ratios (d13C). Samples
(n = 3–5 non-invaded P. pinaster; n = 3–6 invaded
P. pinaster; n = 10 A. longifolia) were combusted in
an elemental analyzer (EuroEA, HEKAtech GmbH,
Wegberg, Germany) and analyzed in a continuous-
flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS, Iso-
prime; GV, Manchester, UK) against IAEA-CH-4
and IAEA-CH-6 standards (International Atomic
Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria). Carbon isotope
ratios are reported in d-notation relative to Vienna
Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB), and the precision of
repeated measurements was 0.1&. Predawn and
midday xylem water potential were measured
on sun-exposed foliage (n = 1–5 non-invaded
P. pinaster; n = 2–6 invaded P. pinaster; n = 3–10
A. longifolia) in winter (January 13, 2008), spring
(May 7, 2008), and summer (August 7, 2008).
Phloem Sap Sampling and Extraction
Phloem sap was collected from A. longifolia and
P. pinaster in the invaded and the non-invaded
stands on 12 days in May and 5 days in August
2008 (for sampling dates see Rascher and others
2010). Phloem sap was extracted using the bark
exudation technique (for example, Gessler and
others 2004) which has been demonstrated as a
sound method for determining d13C in numerous
species including P. pinaster (Devaux and others
2009). Pieces of bark (1 to 3 cm2) were removed
from trunks using a cork-borer or scalpel. Bark was
rinsed with double demineralized water and placed
K. G. Rascher and others
in 6-ml vials (Exetainer, UK) containing 2-ml
double demineralized water, and left for 5 h at
room temperature after which time they were
frozen. After thawing to room temperature in the
lab, phloem exudates were transferred to tin cap-
sules, placed in an oven at 70�C to evaporate the
liquid (conducted in two steps of 250 ll for a total
of 500 ll), after which the tin capsules were cru-
shed and analyzed for d13C as described previously
for foliage.
Modeling Canopy Carbon AssimilationRate
We modeled canopy carbon assimilation rate (Acan)
for A. longifolia and P. pinaster in the invaded and
the non-invaded forest. Full details of the modeling
approach can be found in Rascher and others
(2010). d13C signatures of phloem sap collected in
the trunk integrate carbon fixed in the entire can-
opy and can therefore be used as an integrative
proxy for changing canopy carbon isotope dis-
crimination (D13C). D13C recorded in the phloem
sap in May and August 2008 (spanning the wettest
and driest time periods) was related to changes in
VPD and soil VWC using linear models. Models
combining 4-day lagged VPD with same day soil
VWC had the best predictive power (see Rascher
and others 2010 for modeling details). These
models (Table 1) were then used to simulate D13C
on a daily basis from changes in VPD and soil VWC
throughout the entire study. Finally, canopy car-
bon assimilation rates (Acan) were estimated by
applying Fick’s law to combine canopy stomatal
conductance (GS), determined from QS using a
modified Penman–Monteith equation (Oren and
others 2001), with the ratio of leaf internal to
external CO2 concentration (ci/ca), determined
from the simulated D13C using the Farquhar two-
stage discrimination model for C3 species (Farquhar
and others 1982).
Statistical Analyses
Comparisons of leaf area index, canopy openness,
and transmitted light between the invaded and the
non-invaded stands were made using t tests. One-
way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test was
used to test for seasonal differences in foliar d13C,
N-content and leaf water potential within a species
and stand. Repeated measures ANOVA using linear
mixed effects models (package nlme in R) was used
to compare sapflow on a sapwood area basis (QS)
for invaded and non-invaded P. pinaster stands on
clear days (legend of Table 3 details which days
were removed). The five trees in each stand were
treated as replicates and the effects of day of study
(DOS), invasion status, season, and the invasion
status * season interaction were tested. Within
each season, one-way ANOVA was used to test for
differences in stand transpiration and canopy car-
bon assimilation rates (Acan) between the two
P. pinaster stands on clear days. Two-way ANOVA
(season and invasion status) was used to compare
total stand transpiration between the invaded for-
est (P. pinaster + A. longifolia) and the non-invaded
forest over the entire study. All analyses were
conducted in R v. 2.6.2 (R Development Core
Team 2008).
RESULTS
Climate
The site has a typical Mediterranean climate with
cool, wet winters and hot, dry summers (Figure 1).
VPD varied throughout the study with moderate
values in winter (<1.5 kPa) and maximum midday
values (up to 4 kPa) during the fall, spring, and
summer (Figure 1B). Due to the poor water
retention capacity of the highly porous sandy soils,
and the variability in frequency and magnitude of
precipitation events (Figure 1E), soil volumetric
water content (VWC) was highly variable with
peaks after rainfall events quickly diminishing to
relatively low levels (<5% in fall, spring, and
summer and <10% in winter) (Figure 1D).
A. longifolia Alterations to ForestStructure
Presence of A. longifolia altered the forest structure
predominantly by increasing plant density in the
Table 1. Model Parameters Used to EstimateCanopy D13C from 4-Day Lagged VPD and SameDay VWC from October 2007 to July 2008
Non-invaded Invaded
P. pinaster P. pinaster A. longifolia
b1 18.92 20.62 20.65
b2 -1.12 -1.67 -2.44
b3 0.001 -0.27 -0.18
b4 0.15 0.23 0.20
RMSEP 0.39 0.42 0.64
Models are of the form: D13C = b1 + b2 * VPD + b3 * VWC + b4 * VPD *VWC. Also given are estimates of model error, the root mean squared error ofprediction, RMSEP, calculated using the PRESS procedure (Kutner and others2004).
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
lower and mid-canopy (Figure 2). A. longifolia
contributed significantly to canopy cover in the
invaded forest (Figure 3A), resulting in signifi-
cantly greater leaf area index (LAI) (P < 0.01),
lower canopy openness (P < 0.01), and decreased
transmitted light (P < 0.01) in the invaded com-
pared to the non-invaded forest (Table 2; Figure 3).
Structure of the herbaceous understory was similar
between the invaded and the non-invaded stands
and P. pinaster dominated the upper canopy of both
stands, reaching 18 m in the non-invaded and
15 m in the invaded forest (Figure 2). P. pinaster
tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH)
tended to be greater in the non-invaded than the
invaded stand but the difference was only signifi-
cant for height (t34: P < 0.001 for height, P = 0.11
for DBH; Table 2). Accordingly, the basal area to
ground area ratio (AB:AG) of Pinus was greater in
the non-invaded than the invaded stand (Table 2).
Functional Differences Betweenthe Native and Invasive Species
P. pinaster and A. longifolia differed not only struc-
turally but also functionally. Significant seasonal
changes in foliar carbon isotope signatures were
found in A. longifolia, highlighting that the invader
was more plastic in responding to changes in envi-
ronmental conditions than P. pinaster (Figure 4A).
For A. longifolia, high carbon isotope discrimination
against 13C occurred during winter when water was
abundant (Figure 1) and xylem water potentials
(WPREDAWN and WMIDDAY) were highest (Figure 4C,
D). Discrimination against 13C was lowest during
the dry summer (Figure 1) when WPREDAWN
and WMIDDAY were also significantly reduced
(Figure 4C, D). In comparison, P. pinaster foliar d13C
did not vary by season (Figure 4A) although
WPREDAWN and WMIDDAY did decrease significantly
Figure 1. Microclimate at
Pinheiro da Cruz,
Portugal from October 1,
2007 to August 15, 2008.
A average midday air and
soil temperatures, B
average midday leaf to air
vapor pressure deficit, C
average midday
photosynthetic photon
flux density, D daily
average soil volumetric
water content from 10- to
50-cm depth for the non-
invaded forest, the
invaded forest, and the
open sand, and E rainfall.
Midday averages are
computed from data
collected between 10:00
and 14:00. Arrows in
panel D indicate time
periods of detailed soil dry
down analyses (see
Figure 5).
K. G. Rascher and others
during the summer drought period (Figure 4C, D).
Foliar N was seasonally variable in P. pinaster,
whereas A. longifolia had relatively constant and
comparatively high (>2.0 %) foliar N throughout
the study (Figure 4B). Foliar nitrogen content for
P. pinaster tended to be greater during winter and
spring compared to fall and summer (Figure 4C, D).
Comparing the two stands of P. pinaster, there was a
tendency for greater foliar N, more depleted d13C
signatures and lower WPREDAWN and WMIDDAY in the
invaded stand although the differences were non-
significant, which may be at least partially due
to small sample sizes (P > 0.05 in every season;
Figure 4). Nevertheless, this trend may indicate a
small facilitative effect of A. longifolia N2-fixation on
co-occurring P. pinaster.
A. longifolia Effects on Soil MoistureDynamics
A. longifolia invasion induced changes in vegetation
structure were also related to altered soil infiltration
and dry down dynamics (Figures 1D, 5). The
invaded forest exhibited the largest peaks in soil vol-
umetric water content (15–20% VWC) followed by
the non-invaded forest (7–15%) and the open sand
(4–15%). Although the presence of A. longifolia was
associated with increased precipitation interception
and higher VWC immediately following rainfall
events, soil dried out more rapidly in the invaded
compared to non-invaded stand (Figure 5B–D),
although at the beginning of fall, dry down was
similar between the two plots (Figure 5A).
Invasion Impacts on SapwoodArea-Based Transpiration (QS)
The faster use of soil water in the invaded stand
(Figure 5) corresponded with a higher sap flow rate
per sapwood area (QS) of the invasive A. longifolia
compared to the native P. pinaster (Figure 6A). In
both species, the seasonal trend in water availability
(Figure 1D) was also reflected in QS (Figure 6A).
The highest water flux occurred during spring when
Figure 2. Distribution of
plant height in the A
non-invaded and B
invaded stand. Shown are
the distributions for
P. pinaster, A. longifolia
and the herbaceous
understory. Herbaceous
species include: Calluna
vulgaris, Corema album,
Daphne gnidium, Erica
australis, Erica scoparia,
Erica umbellata, Halimium
commutatum, Juniperus
navicularis, Lithodora
prostrata, Osyris
quadripartita, Rosmarinus
officinalis, Santolina
impressa, Thymus sp., Ulex
jussiaei.
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
Figure 3. Depiction of how the presence of A. longifolia affects forest structure and light climate within the 1000 m2 study
area (50 m 9 24 m including a 4-m wide firebreak between the invaded and non-invaded stands). A A. longifolia canopy
cover (%), B transmitted gap light (%), C canopy openness (%), and D leaf area index (LAI). Panels B–D are calculated
from hemispherical photographs. Measurements of A. longifolia canopy cover and hemispherical photographs were taken
at 34 locations on a systematic grid within the forest (see Rascher and others 2011 for more details on sampling design).
For depiction, data were interpolated between measurement points using the linear interpolation algorithm within the
contour plot function of SigmaPlot v.10.0.
Table 2. Stand Characteristics at Pinheiro da Cruz, Portugal (38�15¢ N, 8�46¢ W)
Non-invaded Invaded
P. pinaster P. pinaster A. longifolia
Tree height (m) 13.7 ± 1.8 11.4 ± 1.9 3.2 ± 1.3
Trunk diameter* (cm) 26.7 ± 5.5 23.5 ± 5.9 3.1 ± 1.8
Basal area/ground area (AB:AG) (cm2 m-2) 27.67 26.08 6.86
Sapwood/basal area (AS:AB) (cm2 cm-2) 0.85 0.85 0.91
Sapwood/ground area (AS:AG) (cm2 m-2) 23.55 22.17 6.21
Non-invaded Invaded
Leaf area index 0.86 ± 0.04a 1.13 ± 0.08b
Canopy openness (%) 40.32 ± 1.07a 32.94 ± 1.84b
Transmitted light (%) 53.34 ± 2.49a 42.93 ± 2.53b
Data are means ± SD for the tree height and diameter. Data are means ± SE (n = 17) for the leaf area index, canopy openness, and transmitted light (calculated using GLA2.0 from hemispherical photographs). Different letters within rows indicate a significant difference between the invaded and non-invaded forest (Student’s t test; P < 0.05).* P. pinaster diameter at breast height, A. longifolia diameter at ground level.
K. G. Rascher and others
conditions were favorable for photosynthesis and
the lowest rates occurred during winter when both
low PPFD and temperature presumably limited
photosynthetic activity (Figure 1). Over the course
of the study, QS differed significantly depending on
day of study (DOS) and season (Table 3a).
Furthermore, the difference in transpiration rate
between P. pinaster growing alone and in competi-
tion with A. longifolia varied depending on season
(significant invasion status * season interaction;
Table 3a).
Within each season QS varied significantly by
DOS, highlighting that transpiration rates faithfully
tracked the day to day variability in abiotic condi-
tions (for example, PPFD, VPD, temperature). Fur-
thermore, in fall (P < 0.05), winter (P < 0.1), and
summer (P < 0.05) there was a significant interac-
tion between DOS and invasion status reflecting that
Figure 4. A Foliar
d13C, B foliar nitrogen
concentration, C
predawn xylem water
potential (WPREDAWN),
and D midday xylem
water potential
(WMIDDAY) for
A. longifolia and
P. pinaster in the
invaded and non-
invaded forest.
Different letters indicate
significant difference
between the seasons
within a species and
invasion status.
Sampling dates: fall:
September 23, 2007;
winter: January 13,
2008; spring: May 7,
2008; and summer:
August 7, 2008.
Figure 5. Curves illustrating the drying of the upper soil (10–50-cm depth) in the invaded and non-invaded forest after a
representative rainfall event in each season. Data were normalized by dividing by the maximum VWC occurring on the
day of the rainfall. Rainfall events: A fall: September 30, 2007; B winter: February 4, 2008; C early spring: March 19, 2008;
D late spring: May 29, 2008. The rainfall on May 29, 2008 was the last rainfall before the summer drought began.
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
the difference in transpiration between the
two P. pinaster stands varied substantially within
most seasons (Table 3b). This interaction occurred
because immediately after rainfall, when water was
abundant, the difference between the two P. pinaster
stands was large but as water availability decreased
the differences in QS between the two stands also
diminished (Figure 6A). In contrast, in spring when
rainfall events were frequent (Figure 1E) and water
was relatively abundant there was no significant
difference in water use between the two pine stands
on a sapwood area basis.
Figure 6. A Sapwood area-related sap flow (QS: m3 m-2 sapwood d-1) and B stand transpiration on a ground area basis
(mm d-1) for the non-invaded and the invaded P. pinaster stands and the A. longifolia understory from October 1, 2007 to
July 31, 2008. Error bars for QS represent 1 SE (n = 5 for Pine and 10 for Acacia) and are shown every fifth day for clarity.
Data are missing due to power supply failure from December 18 to 22, 2007 and January 5 to 11, 2008. Seasons are as
follows: fall: October 1, 2007 to November 17, 2007; winter: November 18, 2007 to February 29, 2008; spring: March 1,
2008 to May 31, 2008; summer: June 1, 2008 to July 31, 2008.
K. G. Rascher and others
Invasion Impacts on Stand LevelTranspiration
However, when the differences in stand structure
(for example, AB:AG and AS:AG) between the two
pine stands were taken into account, an even
stronger negative effect of competition with
A. longifolia was seen (Figures 6B, 7). In fall, win-
ter, and spring stand transpiration was significantly
greater in the non-invaded compared to the
invaded P. pinaster stand (P < 0.001). In summer,
the difference between the P. pinaster stands was
marginally significant (P = 0.05) reflecting that by
July, when soil water was severely limiting (Fig-
ure 1D), there were very similar rates between
both P. pinaster stands and the presence of A. lon-
gifolia had little effect on P. pinaster water use.
Averaged over the entire study, P. pinaster tran-
spiration was 0.70 mm d-1 in the invaded and
0.93 mm d-1 in the non-invaded stand, a reduc-
tion of 25%. This substantial difference between
the two stands results from the fact that stand
transpiration combines QS, which tended to be
greater in the non-invaded P. pinaster forest
(Figure 6A), and stand basal area which was also
greater for the non-invaded P. pinaster forest
(Table 2). Furthermore, the largest difference in
stand transpiration between the P. pinaster stands
corresponded with the time periods where the
largest differences in QS were seen (the beginning
of the fall and summer seasons; Figure 6A). Dif-
ferences between the two P. pinaster stands in
winter were smallest (average over the winter
season in invaded vs. non-invaded: 0.74 vs.
0.58 mm d-1, a difference of 21%) corresponding
to the period when A. longifolia stand transpiration
was at its minimum (average 0.23 mm d-1) and
rainfall was substantially greater than transpiration
indicating a water surplus (Figure 7A). In this wa-
ter-limited Mediterranean system, tree transpira-
tion balances out (fall, spring) or exceeds (summer)
the amount of incoming precipitation during most
of the year (Figure 7A) indicating very little surplus
Table 3. Repeated Measures ANOVA ResultsComparing Sapwood Area-Related Sap Flux (QS)Between P. pinaster in the Invaded and the Non-invaded Stand
df F P
(a)
DOS 1, 2750 945.6 <0.0001
Invasion status 1, 8 1.4 0.2681
Season 3, 2750 138.0 <0.0001
Invasion status * season 3, 2750 4.2 0.0054
(b)
Fall
DOS 1, 461 1262.8 <0.0001
Invasion status 1,8 1.3 0.292
DOS * invasion status 1, 461 23.1 <0.0001
Winter
DOS 1, 812 539.0 <0.0001
Invasion status 1, 8 0.9 0.3723
DOS * invasion status 1, 812 3.0 0.0834
Spring
DOS 1, 848 93.7 <0.0001
Invasion status 1, 8 1.6 0.2482
DOS * invasion status 1, 848 0.1 0.7305
Summer
DOS 1, 598 4077.0 <0.0001
Invasion status 1, 8 1.3 0.2915
DOS * invasion status 1, 598 20.4.0 <0.0001
Only data from clear days were used (midday average PPFD > 1000 lmolm-2 s-1; Figure 1C). (a) Result across the entire study and (b) results of withinseason tests. Dates removed before analysis: November 19, 2007; November 20,2007; December 5, 2007; December 6, 2007; December 7, 2007; December 9, 2007;February 17, 2008; February 18, 2008; February 23, 2008; March 11, 2008;March 19, 2008; April 9, 2008; May 11, 2008; May 15, 2008; May 24, 2008.* DOS—day of study.
Figure 7. A Seasonal summed rainfall and stand transpiration for P. pinaster and A. longifolia in the invaded stand and
pine in the non-invaded stand, B total rainfall and transpiration during the entire study from October 1, 2007 to July 31,
2008. Seasons are as in Figure 6. Significant differences between the invaded and the non-invaded stand are indicated
with stars: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
water. Regardless, A. longifolia presence was asso-
ciated with decreased water use of competing
P. pinaster in all seasons (Figures 6B, 7A). A. longi-
folia not only markedly restricted water available to
P. pinaster; but also led to slightly increased total
stand transpiration in the invaded forest through-
out the study (Figure 7).
Invasion Impacts on Carbon Assimilation
Clearly, A. longifolia invasion had a significant
impact on the water use of co-occurring P. pinaster
trees, which led to the question: to what extent
does invasion by A. longifolia impact stand-level
carbon assimilation rates? To address this we esti-
mated canopy carbon assimilation rates (Acan) on a
daily basis for A. longifolia and P. pinaster in the
invaded and the non-invaded stand. Acan was
determined by combining canopy stomatal con-
ductance (GS) with changes in canopy carbon dis-
crimination (D13C) modeled from the relationship
between phloem sap d13C signatures and changes
in VPD and soil VWC (see ‘‘Material and methods’’
and Rascher and others 2010 for details). Acan
varied seasonally with a general increase from fall
through spring and then a decrease during the
summer drought period (Figure 8). Day-to-day
variability in photosynthetic rate was greatest in
winter and spring when climate conditions (for
example, rainfall and VPD) were also most variable
(Figure 1). The ranking of Acan between the species
was: non-invaded P. pinaster > invaded P. pinaster >
A. longifolia (Figure 8). We found that on clear days
across all seasons P. pinaster in the invaded forest
had significantly lower canopy carbon assimilation
rates compared to P. pinaster in the non-invaded
stand (Figure 8).
DISCUSSION
Here, we have demonstrated the substantial impact
that the understory exotic woody invasive,
A. longifolia, had on water and carbon dynamics in a
Mediterranean dune pine forest. These results
complement previous work detailing significant
alterations in Portuguese dune ecosystems after
invasion by A. longifolia. A. longifolia presence
decreases native plant diversity (Marchante and
others 2003; Rascher and others 2011), significantly
Figure 8. Canopy carbon
assimilation rate: A Daily
average canopy carbon
assimilation rate for
A. longifolia and P. pinaster
in the invaded and the
non-invaded stand, B
seasonal average carbon
assimilation rate for
A. longifolia and P. pinaster
in the invaded and the
non-invaded stand. Error
bars indicate standard
deviation. Seasons are as
in Figure 6. Significant
differences between
P. pinaster in the invaded
and the non-invaded
forest are indicated with
stars: *P < 0.1,
***P < 0.001.
K. G. Rascher and others
alters soil properties (for example, Marchante and
others 2008a, b, 2009) and alters nitrogen cycling
(Hellmann and others 2011). In this study, we
found that A. longifolia had a strong competitive
effect on P. pinaster, decreasing water use and car-
bon fixation rates whereas there was little facilita-
tive effect from introduced nitrogen. This is in
contrast to Australian studies examining the impact
of Acacia sp. on co-occurring Eucalyptus sp. in mixed
plantations (Bristow and others 2006; Forrester and
others 2006a, b) in its relatively wet, native habitat
(annual rainfall � 1000 mm). Those studies found
little competition for water and enhanced growth
and wood production in mixed stands, which was
attributed to the facilitative effect of introduced
nitrogen allowing for increased aboveground car-
bon allocation (Forrester and others 2006a, 2010;
Kelty 2006). Comparing the two stands of P. pinaster
in our study we found a tendency for greater foliar
N, more depleted d13C signatures and lower WPRE-
DAWN and WMIDDAY in the invaded relative to the
non-invaded stand although the differences were
non-significant, which may be partly due to small
sample sizes (P > 0.05 in every season; Figure 4).
Nevertheless, this trend may indicate a small
facilitative effect of A. longifolia N2-fixation on
co-occurring P. pinaster. This contrast highlights the
dominant role that the interdependence between
abiotic site conditions and vegetation characeteris-
tics has in controlling the hydrologic cycle. In mesic
habitats, with little to no competition for water, the
facilitative effect of an additional nitrogen source
may dominate interspecies interactions (Bristow
and others 2006; Forrester and others 2006a).
At our semi-arid site (<400-mm rainfall over
10 months), competition for water dominated the
interaction between A. longifolia and P. pinaster and
overrode any positive effect of increased N2.
We have shown that A. longifolia induced major
changes in P. pinaster forests through the intro-
duction of novel structural and functional traits.
A. longifolia invasion led to a dramatic increase in
vegetation density in the mid-stratum of the
invaded forest, a niche that was empty in the non-
invaded stand (Figure 2). Regarding solely the
structure of the invaded P. pinaster forest, one could
theorize that A. longifolia and P. pinaster would
occupy different niches (for example, understory
vs. overstory, drought semi-deciduous vs. ever-
green, shallow rooted vs. deep rooted) to an extent
that the species would not be in direct competition
for resources (for example, Forrester and others
2005). Applying the theory of complementary
resource use (Forrester and others 2005, 2006b;
Kelty 2006) we could further hypothesize that
invaded forest may more efficiently capture
resources than non-invaded forest. When combin-
ing A. longifolia and P. pinaster we indeed found 9%
greater total stand transpiration (Figure 7) and an
increase in total carbon fixation (Figure 8) in the
invaded forest compared to the non-invaded forest.
Even though A. longifolia filled an empty above-
ground stratum in the forest, its resource use still
impacted the overstory P. pinaster trees indicating
that there was substantial niche overlap in terms of
water sources between the invader and the native
pines.
Furthermore, the changes in aboveground forest
structure after invasion by A. longifolia (Figures 2,
3) were also associated with substantial differences
in soil moisture dynamics (Figures 1D, 5) and
water use rates (Figures 6, 7) between invaded and
non-invaded P. pinaster stands. Immediately after
rain events, soil moisture was typically greater in
the invaded stand than the non-invaded stand
(Figure 1D). Other studies in semi-arid and
savannah ecosystems have similarly found higher
soil moisture underneath canopies of woody shrubs
and trees (Bhark and Small 2003; Segoli and others
2008; Potts and others 2010) which has been
attributed to increased infiltration as a result of
both stemflow (Pressland 1976) and roots of woody
shrubs increasing soil macroporosity which in turn
increases soil water-holding capacity (Segoli and
others 2008). Furthermore, soil organic matter
(OM) content is greater underneath A. longifolia
canopies compared to more open areas (Hellmann
and others 2011) and higher OM decreases soil
bulk density in turn increasing soil water holding
capacity (Segoli and others 2008). A. longifolia also
has smooth bark which has been shown to facili-
tate stem flow (Iida and others 2005). However,
although presence of A. longifolia increased soil
water content directly after rain events (Figure 1D),
the soils in the invaded stand dried out more rapidly
than soils in the non-invaded stand (Figure 5)
indicating that any benefit from this increased soil
water was short-lived and compensated for by the
high transpiration rates of the invader (Figure 6A).
There was competition for water, with stand
transpiration matching or exceeding incoming
precipitation in both the invaded and the non-
invaded stands during most of the year (Figure 7).
Areas with severe water limitation are often
hydrologically insensitive to changes in woody
plant cover, because regardless of vegetation type
all water is evaporated or transpired (for example,
Huxman and others 2005; Wilcox and others
2006). However, in our study we did find a small,
but significant (9%), increase in total transpiration
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
in the invaded compared to the non-invaded stand
(293 mm vs. 269 mm, respectively: Figure 7). The
only time there was not a significant difference
between total transpiration in the invaded and
non-invaded stand was during the summer
drought when water scarcity alone led to signifi-
cant decreases in water use rates of all species
(Figure 7A). More importantly, because Acacia
contributed significantly to stand transpiration in
the invaded stand in all seasons (between 27 and
42%; Figures 6B, 7), the competing P. pinaster trees
experienced a clear water restriction, transpiring
between 21 and 33% less water than P. pinaster
growing in the non-invaded stand (Figures 6, 7).
Similarly, detrimental effects of understory vege-
tation on water use of canopy trees have been
documented for Betula emanii growing with a dwarf
bamboo understory in Japan (Ishii and others
2008); and, in New Zealand stands of Pinus radiata
with a vegetated understory had lower transpira-
tion rates than stands with a bare understory
(Miller and others 1998). Furthermore, decreased
carbon assimilation and stomatal conductance rates
and increased leaf d13C in unmanaged Pinus densi-
flora stands relative to managed stands (where the
understory was clear-cut yearly) have also been
attributed to water restriction in the unmanaged
stand due to presence of understory vegetation
(Kume and others 2003).
Because Acacia invasion substantially decreased
the water available to the co-occurring P. pinaster
trees (Figures 6, 7) and reduced canopy carbon
assimilation rates (Figure 8) in the invaded forest, it
is feasible that P. pinaster growth rates and biomass
production were also affected. Indeed, the largest
difference in stand transpiration (Figure 7) and
carbon assimilation (Figure 8) between the invaded
and the non-invaded stands of P. pinaster occurred
in spring, the season characterized by highest pro-
ductivity, growth, and biomass production. Our
study lacks pre-invasion stand characteristics so we
cannot definitively ascertain if Pinus in the invaded
stand were always smaller or if Acacia invasion
resulted in decreased growth rates and depressed
biomass production. However, the study was con-
ducted in an even-aged plantation forest with the
stands only being separated by a 4-m wide fire-
break making it unlikely that other site character-
istics were responsible for the decreased tree sizes in
the invaded stand (Table 2; Figure 2). This is similar
to results from controlled studies where A. longifolia
was found to out-compete Pinus pinea (also native
to Portuguese dune ecosystems) under a range of
water availabilities, with the pine exhibiting rela-
tively low plasticity (Peperkorn and others 2005;
Werner and others 2010). In general, competition
experiments have shown that A. longifolia has a
consistently high nitrogen uptake efficiency and
higher relative growth rate than native competitors
under a range of water (Werner and others 2010),
light (Peperkorn and others 2005) and nutrient
(Peperkorn and others 2005) levels indicating that
the N2 fixed by A. longifolia in the field may have a
predominantly self-facilitating effect and not be
readily available to native species.
Acacia longifolia may have additionally limited
P. pinaster growth through nutrient limitation. It
has been documented that most N2-fixing species
require significant amounts of phosphorus (Rothe
and Binkley 2001) and aboveground biomass
production of P. pinaster has been linked with
phosphorus availability (Trichet and others 2008).
Therefore, although A. longifolia may enrich the
system with atmospheric N2 it may also limit
phosphorus availability to P. pinaster which could
have contributed to the reduced size of the
P. pinaster growing in competition with A. longifolia
(Table 2; Figure 2).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that woody
plant invasions can significantly alter hydrological
cycles in water-limited ecosystems even when the
invader co-exists with native species in the
understory. Even though A. longifolia is in many
ways functionally unique compared to native spe-
cies (N2-fixer in an N limited system, small tree
where all other understory species are small shrubs
or herbaceous, Figure 2), it nevertheless had a
substantial impact on the native vegetation. Fur-
thermore, we demonstrated that changes in
hydrologic dynamics brought about by A. longifolia
invasion were also associated with decreased car-
bon fixation rates of the overstory P. pinaster trees.
To develop a more complete picture of the overall
impact of A. longifolia invasion, future studies
should examine differences in carbon cycling
between invaded versus non-invaded stands in
more detail (for example, soil C dynamics, fine root
turnover, ecosystem respiration).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Funding for this project was provided by the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, (TRANSDUNE
Project: # WE 2681/3-1). KGR gratefully acknowl-
edges additional funding from the PEO Scholar
Award. We also thank the Estabelecimento Pri-
sional de Pinheiro da Cruz for logistical support and
K. G. Rascher and others
allowing the establishment of our field site. We are
also grateful to Ana Julia Pereira, Tine Hellmann
and Rabea Sutter for their assistance in the field
and Babsi Teichner for isotope analyses.
REFERENCES
Benson D, McDougall L. 1996. Ecology of Sydney plant species
part 4: dicotyledon family Fabaceae. Cunninghamia 4:552–752.
Bhark EW, Small EE. 2003. Association between plant canopies
and the spatial patterns of infiltration in shrubland and
grassland of the Chihuahuan desert, New Mexico. Ecosystems
6:185–96.
Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA. 2007. The nature
and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting
hydrologic services. Ann Rev Environ Resour 32:67–98.
Bristow M, Vanclay JK, Brooks L, Hunt M. 2006. Growth and
species interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a mixed and
monoculture plantation in the humid tropics of north
Queensland. For Ecol Manag 233:285–94.
Calder I, Dye P. 2001. Hydrological impacts of invasive alien
plants. Land Use Water Resour Res 1:1–12.
Cavaleri MA, Sack L. 2010. Comparative water use of native and
invasive plants at multiple scales: a global meta-analysis.
Ecology 91:2705–15.
Cleverly JR, Dahm CN, Thibault JR, McDonnell DE, Allred
Coonrod JE. 2006. Riparian ecohydrology: regulation of water
flux from the ground to the atmosphere in the middle Rio
Grande, New Mexico. Hydrol Process 20:3207–25.
Delzon S, Sartore M, Granier A, Loustau D. 2004. Radial profiles
of sap flow with increasing tree size in maritime pine. Tree
Physiol 24:1285–93.
Devaux M, Ghashghaie J, Bert D, Lambrot C, Gessler A,
Bathellier C, Ogee J, Loustau D. 2009. Carbon stable isotope
ratio of phloem sugars in mature pine trees throughout the
growing season: comparison of two extraction methods. Rapid
Commun Mass Spectrom 23:2511–18.
Edwards WRN, Becker P, Cermak J. 1997. A unified nomen-
clature for sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 17:65–7.
Ewers BE, Mackay DS, Gower ST, Ahl DE, Burrows SN, Samanta
SS. 2002. Tree species effects on stand transpiration in
northern Wisconsin. Water Resour Res 38:1103. doi:10.1029/
2001WR000830.
Ewers BE, Gower ST, Bond-Lamberty B, Wang CK. 2005. Effects
of stand age and tree species on canopy transpiration and
average stomatal conductance of boreal forests. Plant Cell
Environ 28:660–78.
Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA. 1982. On the relationship
between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular
carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol
9:121–37.
Forrester DI, Theiveyanathan S, Collopy JJ, Marcar NE. 2010.
Enhanced water use efficiency in a mixed Eucalyptus globulus
and Acacia mearnsii plantation. For Ecol Manag 259:1761–70.
Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL. 2005. On the success and
failure of mixed-species tree plantations: lessons learned from
a model system of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii. For
Ecol Manag 209:147–55.
Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL, Vanclay JK. 2006a. Mixed-
species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: a
review. For Ecol Manag 233:211–30.
Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL. 2006b. Carbon allocation in a
mixed-species plantation of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia
mearnsii. For Ecol Manag 233:275–84.
Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP. 1999. Gap Light Ana-
lyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy
structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour
fisheye photographs, users manual and program documenta-
tion. Millbrook, New York: Institute of Ecosystem Studies.
Fritzsche F, Abate A, Fetene M, Beck E, Weise S, Guggenberger
G. 2006. Soil-plant hydrology of indigenous and exotic trees
in an Ethiopian montane forest. Tree Physiol 26:1043–54.
Gessler A, Rennenberg H, Keitel C. 2004. Stable isotope com-
position of organic compounds transported in the phloem of
European beech—evaluation of different methods of phloem
sap collection and assessment of gradients in carbon isotope
composition during leaf-to-stem transport. Plant Biol 6:
721–9.
Granier A. 1985. Une nouvelle methode pour la mesure du flux
de seve brute dans le tronc des arbres. Ann For Sci 42:193–
200.
Hellmann C, Sutter R, Rascher KG, Maguas C, Correia O, Wer-
ner C. 2011. Impact of an exotic N2-fixing Acacia on compo-
sition and N status of a native Mediterranean community.
Acta Oecol Int J Ecol 37:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2010.
11.005.
Hunt MA, Beadle CL. 1998. Whole-tree transpiration and water-
use partitioning between Eucalyptus nitens and Acacia dealbata
weeds in a short-rotation plantation in northeastern Tasma-
nia. Tree Physiol 18:557–63.
Huxman TE, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Scott RL, Snyder KA,
Small EE, Hultine K, Pockman WT, Jackson RB. 2005. Eco-
hydrological implications of woody plant encroachment.
Ecology 86:308–19.
Iida S, Tanaka T, Sugita M. 2005. Change of interception process
due to the succession from Japanese red pine to evergreen
oak. J Hydrol 315:154–66.
Ishii HT, Kobayashi T, Uemura S, Takahashi K, Hanba YT,
Sumida A, Hara T. 2008. Removal of understory dwarf bam-
boo (Sasa kurilensis) induces changes in water-relations char-
acteristics of overstory Betula ermanii trees. J For Res 13:101–9.
Jaeger H, Kowarik I, Tye A. 2009. Destruction without extinc-
tion: long-term impacts of an invasive tree species on Gala-
pagos highland vegetation. J Ecol 97:1252–63.
Kagawa A, Sack L, Duarte K, James S. 2009. Hawaiian native
forest conserves water relative to timber plantation: species
and stand traits influence water use. Ecol Appl 19:1429–43.
Kelty MJ. 2006. The role of species mixtures in plantation for-
estry. For Ecol Manag 233:195–204.
Kume A, Satomura T, Tsuboi N, Chiwa M, Hanba YT, Nakane K,
Horikoshi T, Sakugawa H. 2003. Effects of understory vege-
tation on the ecophysiological characteristics of an overstory
pine, Pinus densiflora. For Ecol Manag 176:195–203.
Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, Li W. 2004. Applied linear
statistical models. New York: McGraw Hill Irwin.
Marchante H, Marchante E, Freitas H. 2003. Invasion of the
Portuguese dune ecosystems by the exotic species Acacia lon-
gifolia (Andrews) Willd.: effects at the community level. In:
Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pysek P, Wade PM,
Williamsons M, Eds. Plant invasions: ecological threats and
management solutions. Backhuys: Leiden. p 75–85.
Marchante E, Kjoller A, Struwe S, Freitas H. 2008a. Short- and
long-term impacts of Acacia longifolia invasion on the
Acacia Invasion Alters Ecosystem Functioning
belowground processes of a Mediterranean coastal dune eco-
system. Appl Soil Ecol 40:210–17.
Marchante E, Kjoller A, Struwe S, Freitas H. 2008b. Invasive
Acacia longifolia induce changes in the microbial catabolic
diversity of sand dunes. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2563–8.
Marchante E, Kjoller A, Struwe S, Freitas H. 2009. Soil recovery
after removal of the N2-fixing invasive Acacia longifolia: conse-
quences for ecosystem restoration. Biol Invasions 11:813–23.
Miller BJ, Clinton PW, Buchan GD, Robson AB. 1998. Transpi-
ration rates and canopy conductance of Pinus radiata growing
with different pasture understories in agroforestry systems.
Tree Physiol 18:575–82.
Moore GW, Bond BJ, Jones JA, Phillips N, Meinzer FC. 2004.
Structural and compositional controls on transpiration in 40-
and 450-year-old riparian forests in western Oregon, USA.
Tree Physiol 24:481–91.
Neave HM, Norton TW. 1998. Biological inventory for conser-
vation evaluation—IV, composition, distribution and spatial
prediction of vegetation assemblages in southern Australia.
For Ecol Manag 106:259–81.
Newman BD, Wilcox BP, Archer SR, Breshears DD, Dahm CN,
Duffy CJ, McDowell NG, Phillips FM, Scanlon BR, Vivoni ER.
2006. Ecohydrology of water-limited environments: a scien-
tific vision. Water Resour Res 42:W06302. doi:10.1029/
2005WR004141.
Oren R, Sperry JS, Ewers BE, Pataki DE, Phillips N, Megonigal
JP. 2001. Sensitivity of mean canopy stomatal conductance to
vapor pressure deficit in a flooded Taxodium distichum L. forest:
hydraulic and non-hydraulic effects. Oecologia 126:21–9.
Peperkorn R, Werner C, Beyschlag W. 2005. Phenotypic plas-
ticity of an invasive acacia versus two native Mediterranean
species. Funct Plant Biol 32:933–44.
Pinto I, Pereira H, Usenius A. 2004. Heartwood and sapwood
development within maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stems.
Trees Struct Funct 18:284–94.
Potts DL, Scott RL, Bayram S, Carbonara J. 2010. Woody plants
modulate the temporal dynamics of soil moisture in a semi-
arid mesquite savanna. Ecohydrology 3:20–7.
Prater MR, DeLucia EH. 2006. Non-native grasses alter evapo-
transpiration and energy balance in Great Basin sagebrush
communities. Agric For Meteorol 139:154–63.
Pressland AJ. 1976. Soil moisture redistribution as affected by
throughfall and stemflow in an arid zone shrub community.
Aust J Bot 24:641–9.
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environ-
ment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation
for Statistical Computing.
Rascher KG, Maguas C, Werner C. 2010. On the use of phloem
sap d13C as an indicator of canopy carbon discrimination. Tree
Physiol 30:1499–514. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpq036.
Rascher KG, Große-Stoltenberg A, Maguas C, Meira-Neto JAA,
Werner C. 2011. Acacia longifolia invasion impacts vegetation
structure and regeneration dynamics in open dunes and pine
forests. Biol Invasions 13:1099–1113. doi:10.1007/s10530-
011-9949-2.
Ross KA, Taylor JE, Fox MD, Fox BJ. 2004. Interaction of
multiple disturbances: importance of disturbance interval in
the effects of fire on rehabilitating mined areas. Austral
Ecology 29:508–29.
Rothe A, Binkley D. 2001. Nutritional interactions in mixed
species forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 31:1855–70.
Ryan MG, Stape JL, Binkley D, Fonseca S, Loos RA, Takahashi
EN, Silva CR, Silva SR, Hakamada RE, Ferreira JM, Lima
AMN, Gava JL, Leite LP, Andrade HB, Alves JM, Silva GGC.
2010. Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: how water
availability and stand structure alter production and carbon
allocation. For Ecol Manag 259:1695–703.
Sax DF, Gaines SD. 2008. Species invasions and extinctions: the
future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci
105:11490–7.
Segoli M, Ungar ED, Shachak M. 2008. Shrubs enhance resil-
ience of a semi-arid ecosystem by engineering and regrowth.
Ecohydrology 1:330–9.
Shafroth PB, Cleverly JR, Dudley TL, Taylor JP, van Riper C,
Weeks EP, Stuart JN. 2005. Control of Tamarix in the western
United States: implications for water salvage, wildlife use and
riparian restoration. Environ Manage 35:231–46.
Trichet P, Loustau D, Lambrot C, Linder S. 2008. Manipulating
nutrient and water availability in a maritime pine plantation:
effects on growth, production, and biomass allocation at
canopy closure. Ann For Sci 65:814–26.
Vertessy RA, Watson FGR, O’Sullivan SK. 2001. Factors deter-
mining relations between stand age and catchment water
balance in mountain ash forests. For Ecol Manag 143:13–26.
Werner C, Correia O, Beyschlag W. 1999. Two different strate-
gies of Mediterranean macchia plants to avoid photoinhibitory
damage by excessive radiation levels during summer drought.
Acta Oecol 20:15–23.
Werner C, Zumkier U, Beyschlag W, Maguas C. 2010. High
competitiveness of a resource demanding invasive acacia
under low resource supply. Plant Ecol 206:83–96.
Wilcox BP, Thurow TL. 2006. Emerging issues in rangeland
ecohydrology: vegetation change and the water cycle. Rangel
Ecol Manag 59:220–4.
Wilcox BP, Owens MK, Dugas WA, Ueckert DN, Hart CR. 2006.
Shrubs, streamflow, and the paradox of scale. Hydrol Process
20:3245–59.
K. G. Rascher and others