union budget 2016: key direct tax proposals

16
About BMR Advisors | BMR in News | BMR Insights | Events | Feedback | Contact Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals 1. Changes in corporate tax rate Headline tax rate remains at 30 percent plus surcharge and cess as in Financial Year (‘FY”) 2015-16. Lower headline corporate tax rate of 29 percent for certain domestic companies In case of domestic companies having total turnover / gross receipts not exceeding INR 50 mn in the FY 2014-15, tax rate is proposed to be reduced from 30 percent to 29 percent. Domestic companies set up for manufacturing / production activities can opt for a headline tax rate of 25 percent Domestic companies engaged in manufacturing activities set up on or after March 1, 2016 shall have an option to choose a lower base corporate tax rate of 25 percent instead of 30 percent provided the company does not claim specified tax holiday and incentives, and exercises such option in the prescribed manner before the due date of furnishing of its return of income. 2. Phasing out of deductions and exemptions It is proposed to phase out various tax holidays and incentives under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) as under: Section Incentive currently available in the Act Proposal for phase out Section 10AA: Tax holiday for Special Economic Zone (‘SEZ’) Units Profit linked deductions for units in SEZ for profit derived from export of articles or things or services. No deduction to be available to units commencing manufacture or production of article or thing or start providing services on or after April 1, 2020 (from FY 2020-21 onwards). Section 35AC: Expenditure on Deduction for expenditure incurred by No deduction to be available from Share Connect Please click the links below to read our comprehensive analysis. Customs and excise Service tax Central sales tax GST Anurag Jain +911246695254 [email protected] Manoj N Kumar +918040320030 [email protected] Thirumalesh BN

Upload: bmr-advisors

Post on 19-Feb-2017

176 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

About BMR Advisors | BMR in News | BMR Insights | Events | Feedback | Contact

Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

1. Changes in corporate tax rate

Headline tax rate remains at 30 percent plus surcharge and cess as in Financial

Year (‘FY”) 2015-16.

Lower headline corporate tax rate of 29 percent for certain domestic companies – In

case of domestic companies having total turnover / gross receipts not exceeding

INR 50 mn in the FY 2014-15, tax rate is proposed to be reduced from 30 percent to

29 percent.

Domestic companies set up for manufacturing / production activities can opt for a

headline tax rate of 25 percent – Domestic companies engaged in manufacturing

activities set up on or after March 1, 2016 shall have an option to choose a lower

base corporate tax rate of 25 percent instead of 30 percent provided the company

does not claim specified tax holiday and incentives, and exercises such option in

the prescribed manner before the due date of furnishing of its return of income.

2. Phasing out of deductions and exemptions

It is proposed to phase out various tax holidays and incentives under the Income-tax Act,

1961 (‘Act’) as under:

Section Incentive currently

available

in the Act

Proposal for phase out

Section 10AA:

Tax holiday for

Special Economic

Zone (‘SEZ’) Units

Profit linked deductions

for units in SEZ for profit

derived from export of

articles or things or

services.

No deduction to be

available to units

commencing manufacture

or production of article or

thing or start providing

services on or after

April 1, 2020 (from FY

2020-21 onwards).

Section 35AC:

Expenditure on

Deduction for

expenditure incurred by

No deduction to be

available from

Share

Connect

Please click the links below to read our comprehensive analysis.

Customs and excise

Service tax

Central sales tax

GST

Anurag Jain +911246695254 [email protected]

Manoj N Kumar +918040320030 [email protected]

Thirumalesh BN

Page 2: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

eligible projects or

schemes

way of payment of any

sum to a public sector

company or a local

authority or to an

approved association or

institution, etc. on certain

eligible social

development project or a

scheme.

April 1, 2017 (i.e. from

FY 2017-18 and

subsequent years).

Section 35CCD:

Expenditure on

skill development

project

Weighted deduction of

150 percent on any

expenditure incurred (not

being expenditure in the

nature of cost of any

land or building) on any

notified skill

development project by

a company.

Deduction to be restricted

to 100 percent from April 1,

2020 (i.e. from FY 2020-21

onwards).

Section 80IA;

80IAB, and 80IB -

Deduction in

respect of profits

derive from:

a) development,

operation and

maintenance of an

infrastructure

facility (80-IA)

(b) development

of SEZs (80-IAB)

(c) production of

mineral oil and

natural gas [80-

IB(9)]

100 percent profit linked

deductions for specified

period on eligible

business carried on by

industrial undertakings

or enterprises referred in

sections 80IA; 80IAB,

and 80IB.

No deduction to be

available if the specified

activity commences on or

after April 1, 2017. (i.e.

from FY 2017-18 and

subsequent years).

Section 32 read

with the rules:

Accelerated

Depreciation

Accelerated depreciation

is currently available up

to 100 percent in respect

of certain block of assets

for certain sectors.

The highest rate of

depreciation to be

restricted to 40 percent

with effect from April 1,

2017. (i.e. from FY 2017-

18 and subsequent years).

The new rate to be made

applicable to all the assets

(whether old or new) falling

in the relevant block of

assets.

+918040320187 [email protected]

Radhika Rastogi +918040320189 [email protected]

Page 3: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Section 35(1)(ii):

Expenditure on

scientific research

Weighted deduction from

the business income to

the extent of 175 percent

of any sum paid to an

approved scientific

research association

which has the object of

undertaking scientific

research. Similar

deduction is also

available if a sum is paid

to an approved

university, college or

other institution and if

such sum is used for

scientific research.

Weighted deduction to be

restricted to 150 percent

from April 1, 2017 to March

31, 2020 (i.e. from FY

2017-18 to FY 2019-20)

and deduction shall be

restricted to 100 percent

from April 1, 2020 (i.e.

from FY 2020-21 onwards)

Section 35(1)(iia):

Expenditure on

scientific research

Weighted deduction from

the business income to

the extent of 125 percent

of any sum paid as

contribution to an

approved scientific

research company.

Deduction to be restricted

to 100 percent with effect

from April 1, 2017 (i.e.

from FY 2017-18 and

subsequent years)

Section 35(1)(iii):

Expenditure on

scientific research

(c) production of

mineral oil and

natural gas [80-

IB(9)]

Weighted deduction from

the business income to

the extent of 125 percent

of contribution to an

approved research

association or university

or college or other

institution to be used for

research in social

science or statistical

research.

Deduction to be restricted

to 100 percent with effect

from April 1, 2017 (i.e.

from FY 2017-18 and

subsequent years)

Section 35(2AA):

Expenditure on

scientific research

Weighted deduction from

the business income to

the extent of 200 percent

of any sum paid to a

National Laboratory or a

university or an Indian

Institute of Technology

or a specified person for

the purpose of approved

scientific research

programme.

Weighted deduction to be

restricted to 150 percent

with effect from April 1,

2017 to March 31, 2020

(i.e. from FY 2017-18 to

FY 2019-20)

Deduction shall be

restricted to 100 percent

from April 1, 2020 (i.e.

from FY

2020-21 onwards).

Page 4: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Section 35(2AB):

Expenditure on

scientific research

Weighted deduction of

200 percent of the

expenditure (not being

expenditure in the nature

of cost of any land or

building) incurred by a

company, engaged in

the business of bio-

technology or in the

business of manufacture

or production of any

article or thing except

some items appearing in

the negative list

specified in Schedule-XI,

on scientific research on

approved in-house

research and

development facility.

Weighted deduction shall be

restricted to 150 percent from

April 1, 2017 to March 31,

2020 (i.e. from FY 2017-18 to

FY 2019-20)

Deduction shall be restricted

to 100 percent from April 1,

2020 (i.e. from FY 2020-21

onwards)

Section 35AD:

Deduction in

respect of

specified business

In case of a cold chain

facility, warehousing

facility for storage of

agricultural produce, an

affordable housing

project, production of

fertilizer and hospital

weighted deduction of

150 percent of capital

expenditure (other than

expenditure on land,

goodwill and financial

assets) is allowed.

Weighted deduction to be

restricted to 100 percent of

capital expenditure with

effect from April 1, 2017

(i.e. from FY 2017-18

onwards)

Section 35CCC:

Expenditure on

notified

agricultural

extension project

Weighted deduction of

150 percent of

expenditure incurred on

notified agricultural

extension project

Deduction to be restricted

to 100 percent from April 1,

2017 (i.e from FY 2017-18

onwards).

The above proposals are a part of the overall plan of the Government to reduce to the

headline tax rate to 25 percent and to compensate the same by removal of tax holidays

and incentives currently prevailing under the Act.

3. Equalisation levy

In line with one of the recommendations under the BEPS Action Plan 1, it is

proposed to introduce an Equalization levy under a separate chapter in the Finance

Act at the rate of 6 percent on the consideration for specified services (online

Page 5: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

advertisement, provision for digital advertising space or any other facility or service

as may be prescribed for the purpose of online advertisement) received by non-

resident, from a resident or a non-resident having a PE in India.

Equalisation levy would not be applicable in case the non-resident has a permanent

establishment in India or in case the consideration from a payer does not exceed

INR 100,000 in any FY or in a case where the payments are not for the purpose of

any business or profession.

Equalisation levy is to be deducted by the payer at the time of making payment to

the non-resident and deposited with the Government within specified time.

Failure to deduct and pay the levy will attract interest and penalty on the payer.

It is also proposed to introduce section 10(50) to exempt amounts subjected to

Equalisation levy from payment of income-tax.

The BPES Action Plan 1 provides that countries could consider introduction of

Equalisation levy provided they respect their existing treaty obligations or bilateral

tax treaties. While the Government appears to have unilaterally introduced the new

Equalisation levy, the constitutional validity of the levy and position of this levy vis-a-

vis the double taxation avoidance treaties is not clear. It may also be relevant to

note that most treaties (US, UK, Singapore etc.) cover taxes identical or

substantially similar to income-tax which are imposed in addition to or in place of

the existing income-tax in India.

While an appeal is provided against the levy of penalty for non-deduction / non-

payment of Equalization levy, there does not seem to be any remedy against the

imposition of the levy itself.

Non deduction / payment of Equalization levy would also lead to disallowance of the

expenditure in the hands of the payer under section 40(a) of the Act.

4. Additional tax on dividend income

In addition to the Dividend Distribution Tax (‘DDT’) paid by companies, it is proposed to

levy tax at the rate of 10 percent on gross amount of dividend, in excess of INR 1 mn

per annum, payable to individuals, HUFs and firms by a domestic company. This

amendment is to be effective from FY 2016-17.

5. Changes related to income from business / profession

Rationalisation of disallowance under section 14A

It is proposed to amend Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, to rationalize quantum

of disallowance under section 14A and further provide that disallowance shall not

exceed the actual expenditure claimed.

Page 6: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Patent box regime

It is proposed that royalty income of an eligible assessee derived from patents

developed and registered in India be taxed at 10 percent (plus applicable surcharge

and cess) on the gross amount of royalty, subject to certain conditions. Eligible

assessee means a person resident in India, who is the ‘true and first’ inventor of the

invention and whose name is entered on the patent register as the patentee in

accordance with Patents Act, 1970. No expenditure or allowance in respect of such

royalty income will be allowed. Such income would not be liable to MAT.

Rationalisation of investment allowance provision under section 32AC

The current provisions require acquisition and installation of the plant and machinery

exceeding INR 250 mn in the same FY to avail of investment allowance. It is now

proposed to allow investment allowance even where the plant and machinery is

acquired during any FY and installation is made before March 31, 2017. Where the

installation is not in the year of acquisition, the deduction shall be allowed in the year of

installation.

Presumptive taxation

It is proposed to increase the monetary limit in respect of the presumptive taxation

for business under section 44AD from INR 10 mn to INR 20 mn. The presumptive

tax regime would be denied for a certain period where it is not availed

continuously for a specified period.

It is also proposed to extend the presumptive scheme to professionals with gross

receipts of up to INR 5 mn by introducing section 44ADA. The profits would be

deemed to be 50 percent of gross receipts.

6. New incentives / deductions announced

Revamp of section 80JJAA to allow a deduction to all companies subject to tax

audit

Section 80JJAA earlier entailed a deduction of 30 percent of the wages paid to new

regular workmen employed by a manufacturing entity for a period of 3 years subject to

satisfaction of certain conditions.

It is proposed to revamp section 80JJAA to make it applicable to all assesses that are

subjected to tax audit under section 44AB of the Act and allows a deduction equivalent

to 30 percent of the emoluments paid to additional employees for a period of 3 years

subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.

Page 7: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Additional depreciation of 20 percent to be extended to companies engaged in

transmission of power

It is proposed to extent the benefit of additional depreciation of 20 percent in respect of

cost of new plant and machinery acquired and installed to assesses engaged in

transmission / distribution of power, in addition to companies engaged in generation or

generation and distribution of power.

7. Changes in ‘Capital Gains’ tax provisions

Amendment to section 112 – concessional rate on certain securities

The provisions of section 112 currently provide a lower tax rate of 10 percent for long

term capital gains on transfer of unlisted securities by non-residents. There have been

differing views on whether shares of a private companies would be covered under this

provision. The proposal seeks to specifically include shares of a company, other than a

company in which public are substantially interested, for concessional tax

treatment. However, this proposal is applicable prospectively from FY 2016-17 and

hence positions adopted for the past would have to be considered accordingly.

Reduction of period of holding for unlisted companies

While in the Budget speech, the Finance Minister mentioned that the period of holding

in case of unlisted companies is proposed to be reduced from 36 months to 24 months

to qualify as a long term capital asset, there is no specific amendment in the Finance

Bill in this regard.

Other changes related to ‘Capital Gains tax’ provisions

A new condition under section 47(xiiib) for tax neutrality of conversion of company

into LLP, that the total value of assets as appearing in books of accounts of the

company in any of the three FYs preceding the year of conversion should not

exceed INR 50 mn.

Amendment to section 50C to provide that where the date of agreement and date

of registration for transfer of the immovable property are different, the value

adopted by the stamp valuation authority as on date of agreement may be

considered as full value of consideration, subject to certain conditions.

Insertion of section 54EE to provide an exemption from long term capital gains up

to an amount of INR 5 mn provided the capital gains are invested up to March 31,

2019, in units of such funds as may be notified by the Government.

Provisions related to taxability of non-compete fee in section 28(va) are proposed

to be extended to professionals.

8. Withholding tax provisions

Page 8: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

It is proposed to increase the threshold limit for deduction of tax at source on

various payments as given below:

Present

section

Nature of payments Existing threshold

limit (in INR)

Proposed

threshold limit (in

INR)

192A Payment of

accumulated balance

due to an employee

30,000 50,000

194BB Winnings from Horse

Race

5,000 10,000

194C Payments to Contractors Aggregate annual

limit of 75,000

Aggregate

annual limit of

100,000

194LA Payment of

Compensation on

acquisition of certain

Immovable Property

200,000 250,000

194D Insurance commission 20,000 15,000

194G Commission on sale of

lottery tickets

1,000 15,000

194H Commission or

brokerage

5,000 15,000

It is also proposed to reduce the rates for deduction of tax at source on various

payments as given below:

Present

section

Nature of payment Existing rate of

TDS

Proposed rate of

TDS

19DA Payment in respect of

Life Insurance Policy

2 percent 1 percent

194EE Payments in respect

of NSS Deposits

20 percent 10 percent

194D Insurance commission Rate in force

(10 percent)

5 percent

194G Commission on sale

of lottery tickets

10 percent 5 percent

194H Commission or

brokerage

10 percent 5 percent

Page 9: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

9. Provisions relating to Foreign Companies / non-residents

As promised after the report of the AP Shah Committee, it is proposed to amend

section 115JB to exclude, retrospectively from Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2001-02,

foreign companies from levy of MAT subject to the following conditions:

Foreign company does not have a permanent establishment in India under the

relevant double taxation avoidance treaty; or

Where there is no double tax avoidance treaty, the foreign company is not

required to seek registration under the company law of India.

Provisions relating to testing residence in India of a foreign company on the basis of

Place of Effective Management (‘POEM’), which was introduced by the Finance Act,

2015, with effect from FY 2015-16, is proposed to be deferred by one year. It is also

proposed to insert enabling provisions for prescribing mechanism of taxation of foreign

companies considered as ‘resident’ in India for the first time based on POEM. Given

that the guidelines relating to determining POEM have not yet been finalized, this is a

welcome step.

Higher withholding tax stipulated under section 206AA for non-furnishing of PAN is

proposed to be withdrawn in respect of payments to non-residents in respect of

payment of interest on long term bonds covered under section 194LC and on other

payments on satisfaction of prescribed conditions.

10. Changes related to filing of Return of Income and other procedural changes

It is proposed to make the following amendments in the provisions in relation to filing of

the return of income for AY 2017-18 onwards:

The time limit for filing a belated return is proposed to be reduced and belated

return can be filed only till the end of the relevant AY as against current period of

one year from the end of the relevant AY.

Belated return will also be capable of amendment which is currently not

permitted.

It is proposed to make it mandatory for furnishing of return of income, if the total

income before exemption under section 10(38) of the Act is in excess of maximum

amount not chargeable to tax.

Time limits to give effect to appellate / revision orders are proposed to be provided as

under:

Appellate orders (other than cases of fresh assessment), within a period of three

months from the end of the month in which order is received.

Page 10: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Revision orders under section 263 (other than for fresh assessment), three

months from the end of the month of passing the revision order).

Timelines would be extended by a maximum period of six months only on a

written request of the assessing officer to the Principal Commissioner or

Commissioner.

In case the appellate orders / revision orders are received / passed before June 1,

2016, the orders giving effect to the same are required to be passed on or before

March 31, 2017.

Additional interest in case of delay in processing refunds

In cases where a refund, arising from appellate / revision orders is not processed

within three months, additional interest of 3 percent per annum under section 244A of

the Act would be paid to the taxpayers from the expiry of the period of three

months. This amendment is applicable from June 1, 2016.

No appeal by revenue against Dispute Resolution Panel (‘DRP’) directions

In order to reduce litigation, it is proposed that an assessing officer will not be

permitted to appeal before the Tribunal against the order pursuant to DRP’s

directions. This amendment is applicable from June 1, 2016.

11. Rationalization of penalty for concealment of income

It is proposed to do away with the current penalty provisions under section 271 which

prescribes a minimum penalty of 100 percent and maximum penalty of 300 percent of

tax evaded.

To remove discretion of assessing officers and reduce litigation, new penalty

provisions reducing penalty to 50 percent of the tax on income ‘under reported’ other

than cases of misreporting have been proposed by way of insertion of section 270A.

Penalty of 200 percent of the tax on income ‘misreported would be levied’.

Under reported income is basically the difference between the income assessed and

returned or the income assessed beyond the maximum amount not chargeable to tax

where no return is filed. In certain situations income may not be treated as under-

reported, for instance where the assessing officer is satisfied that the explanation of

the assessee is bona fide and all material facts have been disclosed by the assessee

or higher income is assessed on account of difference in estimates or on account of

transfer pricing adjustments where appropriate documentation has been maintained

and transaction reported etc. .

Page 11: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

‘Misreporting’ is defined to include situations of misrepresentation, suppression of

facts, claims of expenditure not substantiated by evidence, false entries in the books,

failure to record receipts and failure to report international transactions.

The tax on which penalty is computed is calculated at the rate applicable to a company

or firm as the case may be and in other cases at 30 percent of under reported income.

The taxpayer can make an application to the assessing officer to grant immunity from

penalty and prosecution for under reporting income other than cases of misreporting,

subject to certain conditions, including not filing an appeal against the assessment

order.

However, it seems that inadvertently no provision has been made for an appeal to

Commissioner (Appeals) against the order of the assessing officer levying penalty

under section 270A.

12. Transfer pricing

Country by Country Reporting

The Bill proposes to adopt recommendations under Action Plan 13 of Base Erosion

and Profit Shifting (‘BEPS’) initiative of Organization of Economic Co-operation and

Development (‘OECD’) with reference to Country by Country Reporting (‘CbCR’) and

Master file in line with international consensus. Information required to be disclosed

under the proposed provision appears to be consistent with the template prescribed

under Action 13. Further, the timelines for CbCR as per the Bill is consistent with

international model legislation which applies to reporting FYs of international groups

beginning after Jan 1, 2016 and filing CbCR no later than 12 months from the end of

the FY.

With effect from April 1, 2016, entities fulfilling prescribed criteria are required to

disclose following information of the group:

aggregate amount of revenue;

profit / loss before income tax;

amount of income-tax paid and accrued;

details of capital;

accumulated earnings;

number of employees;

tangible assets other than cash or cash equivalent in respect of each country or

territory;

details of each constituent's residential status;

nature and detail of main business activity; and

any other information as may be prescribed.

The threshold parameter for CbCR filing requirement is the consolidated group

revenue. While the threshold amount is to be prescribed, entities with consolidated

Page 12: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

group revenue not exceeding such threshold are exempted from these

requirements. Useful to note that current international consensus is for Euro 750 mn

equivalent in local currency.

The first CbCR filing will be due along with the Indian return of income for FY 2016-17,

i.e. by November 30, 2017.

A constituent entity resident in India, is required to report to the prescribed income-tax

authority whether it is the alternate reporting entity of the group or the details of the

parent entity or the alternate entity and the country in which such entities are resident.

A parent entity or alternate reporting entity, resident in India, is to furnish the report as

may be prescribed. A constituent entity, resident in India, is to furnish the report if

parent entity is resident of a country with which India does not have an agreement for

exchange of CbCR or in case a systematic failure has been intimated by the

prescribed authority. An exemption is provided to a constituent entity from furnishing

the report in case the alternate reporting entity has furnished a similar report to the

authority of another country, subject to satisfaction of prescribed conditions.

Guidelines for CbCR are to be prescribed by the Revenue.

While no specific documentation requirement is prescribed for a master file, the

Memorandum makes a reference to maintenance of a master file.

Additional provisions relating to prescribed authority requesting documents from

reporting entity for ascertaining accuracy of CbCR, definitions of terms such as

‘constituent entity’, ‘alternate reporting entity’, ‘international group’, ‘parent entity’ and

‘reporting entity’, etc are provided in context of filing responsibility of CbCR.

Penalty provisions

Non-furnishing of CbCR by an entity is to entail a penalty of:

INR 5,000 per day where default is upto one month;

INR 15,000 per day from period after one month for a continuing default.

Non-furnishing of information / documents within period allowed by the prescribed

authority is to entail a penalty of INR 5,000 per day.

Where a default continues even after service of order levying penalty under the above

two provisions, a penalty of INR 50,000 per day is to apply beyond the date of service

of order.

Inaccurate information provided in CBCR is to entail a penalty of INR 500,000.

Increase in period of limitation for transfer pricing assessment

With effect from June 1, 2016, if the period of limitation available for a transfer pricing

officer to pass an order is less than 60 days [under the circumstances

Page 13: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

referred in clause (ii) or (viii) of explanation 1 to section 153], the remaining period

shall be extended upto 60 days. Such circumstances apply in the following cases:

assessment proceeding is stayed by an order or injunction of any court; or

where a reference for exchange of information is made by an authority competent

under an agreement referred to in section 90 or section 90A.

Change in period of limitation for assessment

With effect from June 1, 2016, the due date for passing an assessment order under

section 143 or section 144 will be 21 months from end of AY. In case of reference to a

transfer pricing officer, such due date is extended by 12 months, hence the transfer

pricing order has to be issued 60 days prior to such date of completion of

assessment.

13. New Dispute Resolution Scheme

It is proposed to implement a new scheme (called The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution

Scheme 2016) in respect of tax disputed in appeals before the Commissioner on

Income-tax (Appeals) pending as on February 29, 2016 and for tax demanded on

account of any retrospective amendment relating to a period prior to the date on which

amendment was made and which is disputed as on February 29, 2016, subject to

certain conditions. The scheme is not proposed to be a part of the Income-tax Act but

envisaged to be a part of the Finance Bill 2016.

The taxpayer can avail the benefits under the said scheme by filing a declaration

during the specified period (starting from June 1, 2016) with the designated authority. If

the declaration is filed in accordance with the scheme, the amount payable would be

as under:

For tax disputed in appeal pending before Commissioner (Appeals):

o In case of assessment order - the tax and interest up to date of assessment. If

the disputed tax exceeds INR 1 mn, 25 percent of the minimum penalty would

also be required to be paid.

o In case of penalty order – 25 percent of the penalty along with the tax and

interest up to date of assessment.

For disputes on account of retrospective amendments - amount of tax.

In cases where an appeal is pending with the Commissioner (Appeals), on filing the

declaration, the appeal would deemed to have been withdrawn. In other cases, the

taxpayer would have to withdraw the appeal and / or the claims for arbitration /

conciliation etc and furnish the proof of such withdrawal along with the declaration in

addition to an undertaking not to pursue any remedy in respect of the dispute.

Page 14: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Within 60 days of the receipt of such declaration, the designated authority shall

determine the amount payable and issue a certificate to that extent (the same is not

appealable). The taxpayer would have to remit such amount within a period of 30 days

of receipt of the certificate and communicate the same to the designated authority.

The designated authority is required to grant certain immunities from prosecution,

penalties and interest subject to the fulfilment of prescribed conditions. The scheme is

designed to inter alia cover disputed matters on account of the amendment to section 9

of the Act relating to ‘indirect transfer’ on account of transfer of shares of a foreign

company.

14. New Income Declaration Scheme

It is proposed introduce a new scheme (called The Income Declaration Scheme, 2016)

effective from June 1, 2016 to facilitate a one-time disclosure of undisclosed income of

any FY up to 2015-16, subject to certain conditions.

Any amounts declared under this scheme would be taxed at 30 percent plus a

surcharge of 25 percent (to be called Krishi Kalyan cess) of such tax and penalty at the

rate of 25 percent of the tax payable, effectively amounting to 45 percent on the

undisclosed income.

Amounts covered under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets)

and Imposition of Tax Act 2015 are not eligible for declaration under this scheme.

The amounts declared under this scheme would not be included in the total income for

any year under the Act or in net wealth under the Wealth Tax Act and shall be immune

from penalties and prosecution under the Act.

It seems to be debatable whether this scheme meets the undertaking given by the

Government earlier to not introduce any new voluntary disclosure scheme granting

immunities to dishonest taxpayers.

15. Other proposals

Tax collection at source

It is proposed to collect tax at source at 1 percent in case of following items:

Purchase of Motor vehicle of value exceeding INR 1 mn; and

Purchase of goods and services in cash of value exceeding INR 0.2 mn.

Advance tax for other than corporate assessee

Due dates for payment of advance tax and the number of instalments is proposed to

be rationalized with those of companies (i.e four instalments instead of

three). Consequential amendments are also proposed to be made to section 234C

which provides for chargeability of interest for deferment of advance tax to bring it in

sync with the amendments proposed in the abovementioned section 211.

Page 15: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

Interest under section 244A

It is proposed that where there has been a delay in the filing of the return of

income, the period for computation of interest on refunds arising from advance tax

and TDS shall commence from the date of filing the return as against April 1 of the

relevant AY.

Interest on refunds arising from self-assessment tax are proposed to be granted

statutory recognition from the date of payment of tax or filing of return, wherever is

later, to the date of grant of refund.

Rationalisation of buy back tax provisions

It is proposed that section 115QA of the Act relating the taxation of share buy

back will apply to buy back under any provision of applicable company law in India

and not restricted to buy back under section 77A of the Companies Act 1956.

Further, rules shall be prescribed for the manner of determination of amount

received by the company on issue of shares in various circumstances, including

shares being issued under tax neutral reorganizations (mergers, demergers etc.)

to remove ambiguities in applying the provisions.

16. Changes related to individual taxation

Tax rates

Slab rates for FY 2016-17 have remained unchanged;

Surcharge on persons other than companies, firms and co-operative societies

having income above INR 10 mn increased from 12 percent to 15 percent;

Relief in respect of Personal taxation

Certain minor reliefs are proposed in respect of rebates and deductions available to

individuals. However, employer contributions to provident fund / superannuation in

excess of INR 0.15 mn per annum are proposed to be taxed as income for the

employees.

BMR Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

36B, Dr. RK Shirodkar Marg, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India

Tel: +91 22 6135 7000 | Fax: +91 22 6135 7070

Page 16: Union Budget 2016: Key direct tax proposals

BMR and Community

BMR has a strong commitment to good citizenship and community service. We are as dedicated to community work as we

are to client work. Wherever appropriate we partner with our clients in fulfilling our social responsibility. Through the firm’s

‘Go Green Initiative’ we adopt environment friendly practices at our work place. The firm actively supports SOS Children’s

Village, Indian Red Cross Society and MillionTrees Gurgaon campaign. For more details on our social and environmental

responsibility programme, click here.

Disclaimer:

This newsletter has been prepared for clients and Firm personnel only. It provides general information and guidance as on

date of preparation and does not express views or expert opinions of BMR Advisors. The newsletter is meant for general

guidance and no responsibility for loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material

contained in this newsletter will be accepted by BMR Advisors. It is recommended that professional advice be sought

based on the specific facts and circumstances. This newsletter does not substitute the need to refer to the original

pronouncements.

Copyright 2016. BMR Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved | In case, you do not wish to receive this

newsletter, click here to unsubscribe