unit 2: an american perspective on criminal law cj106 foundations of international and comparative...
TRANSCRIPT
Unit 2: An American Perspective on Criminal Law
CJ106 Foundations of International and Comparative Criminal Justice
Unit 2 Assignments
Read (eBook): Chapters 3 and 4Extra Extra! (readings)Graded Work:
-- Discussion Board (25 pts)-- Seminar (15 pts)
-- Quiz (30 pts)70 Points Total
Discussion Boards
Follow “The Rule of Threes”:
– Three (3) responses minimum
– Three (3) different days
– Three (3) responses express critical thought and advance the discussion
Quizzes
Unlimited retakes (within unit) Unlimited time (within unit) Conclusion: go slow, and retake the quiz
until you answer every question correctly and collect the full 30 points.
Seminar Topics: Tonight
Substantive and Procedural (criminal law) The crime control model and the due process model The four legal traditions The impact the war on terrorism has had on issues
of safety and liberty Balancing security and personal liberties.
Substantive Criminal Law
Substantive criminal law defines the conduct that qualifies as a crime. An example of substantive criminal law is the Illinois the Criminal Code. It contains definitions of all conduct that constitutes a crime, such as robbery, murder, theft, and kidnapping.
Procedural Criminal Law
Procedural criminal law involves the rules that govern the enforcement of criminal laws. (Think of our constitutional protections in the Bill of Rights.)
Examples:
-- Search and Seizure (4th Amendment)
-- Privilege Against Self-Incrimination (5th Amendment)
-- Right to Counsel (6th Amendment)
-- No Cruel and Unusual Punishment (8th Amendment
Due Process Model
Assumes freedom is so important that every that every effort must be made to ensure that government intrusion follows legal procedure
Seeks to make decisions that identify legal guilt Follows rules that emphasize containing the government’s level of
intrusion into citizens’ lives Emphasizes legitimacy of action Insists on a formal, adjudicative, adversarial fact-finding process, even
though such restraints, may keep the process from operating with maximal efficiency
Due Process Model
ExamplesLegal guilty (versus factual guilt)
– See example on pp. 83-84
Warrantless searches and seizures presumed unreasonable
Crime Control Model
Assumes freedom so important that every effort must be made to repress crime
Seeks to make decisions what will identify factual guilt
Follows rules that emphasize the repression of criminal activity
Emphasizes efficiency of action (i.e., speed and finality)
Requires a high rate of apprehension and conviction by early exclusion of those not likely to be guilty
Crime Control Model
Examples– Guilty pleas (barest form of adversarial process)– Probable cause to detain (Gerstein)– Finality of Conviction: constitutional right to only
one appeal after conviction; no constitutional right to collaterally attack conviction
Due Process vs. Crime Control
Who is the greatest threat to our freedom?– government agents, like police or prosecutors
-OR-– the criminal trying to harm us
* How would each model answer the question?
* Can both government and criminals deprive of property, liberty, and life?
* Who do you think is the greater threat?
*Which model does the United States follow?
Balancing Due Process and Crime Control
Due process = liberty Crime control = safety/security
Liberty and safety are always at odds. How do we balance our values of liberty and
safety?
Balancing Due Process and Crime Control
Benjamin Franklin’s once said: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Do you agree or disagree with the quote? Explain.
Common Law (Origins)
Feudal practices (historical base) Custom (common legal tradition with
principles) Equity (a sense of fairness)
– Law is binding because it is based on custom
Civil Law (Origins)
Roman Law (written worldly law) Canon Law (written spiritual law) Codification (written and revolutionary)
– Written: law enacted by recognized authority– Revolutionary: abolishes all prior laws
Law is binding because it was appropriately authorized and record.
**Note: common law countries have codified laws, but they supplement (not replace) prior laws.
Socialist (Origins)
Russian law – primary: decisions by princes acting as judges– Secondary: customs and Byzantine law
Law as artificial– Law is an arbitrary product of autocratic sovereigns (“Law is like a
wagon tongue, it goes wherever you turn it.”) Marxism-Leninism
– law is subordinate to policy (i.e., the policy that a collectivized economy and social state is above the idea of law or individual rights). Law is a tool (to assist in achieving a communist state), not an absolute value. Law will ultimately be irrelevant.
Islamic or Shari’a Law (Origins)
Qur’an and Sunna (primary law)– Qur’an: contains rules of God for human behavior (religious, social, personal, economic)– Sunna: living by the example of the prophet Muhammad (do as he said, did, or
approved). The Sunna explains, clarifies, and amplifies the Qur’an. (Sunna recorded in the hadiths)
ijma and qiyas (secondary law)– Ijma: the process whereby legal scholars reach an agreement (consensus) on questions not answered by Qur’an
or Sunna)—a gap filler.– qiyas: the process of reasoning by analogy (in order to reach a consensus)
Schools of law (variations in interpreting/applying Qur’an and Sunna)– Sunni: Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali– Shi’a: Ja’afari
No distinction b/w legal system and other controls on a person’s behavior.
Islamic law intrinsic to Islamic faith and life.
Cultural Comparisons
What is the position of the judiciary in relation to other government branches?
– Common: courts share in balancing power– Civil: courts have equal but separate power– Socialist: courts inferior to legislature– Islamic: courts and other gov’t branches subordinate to the
Shari’a
Substantive Comparisons
What is the source of law, or where do laws come from?
– Common: custom– Civil: written code (provided by rulers or legislators)– Socialist: principles of the socialist revolution– Islamic: divine revelation
Procedural Comparisons
How is flexibility provided in each tradition when the source (e.g., custom or written code) doesn’t answer a question?
– Common: judge-made law and particularization– Civil: different judges define and interpret written codes
differently; identifying issues as questions of law – Socialist: principles of analogy and directions from higher-
level courts (punish conduct not covered in criminal code by analogizing to conduct outlawed in the code)
– Islamic: Mazalim courts and process and ijtihad
Unit 3 Project
Relying heavily on the course material from Units 1 and 2, as well as outside research, create a 6-8 slide PowerPoint presentation (excluding the title and reference slides) that addresses the following:Identify the sources and foundations of international criminal justice
– Discuss and explain the four legal traditions that are identifiable today
– How are the traditions similar?– How do the traditions differ?