unit 6 tort law suny criminal & business law/musolino

32
unit 6 unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

Upload: imogen-bridges

Post on 03-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

unit 6unit 6

Tort Law

SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

Page 2: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-2

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

1. Differentiate between the objectives of tort law and those of criminal law This will be bullet level one

2. Outline the nature of various liability3. Discuss the element of duty4. Identify the principal intentional torts

and outline the elements of each5. Determine the four elements of

negligence

Page 3: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-3

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

6. Contrast contributory negligence, comparative negligence, and assumption of the risk

7. Judge in a particular case whether the doctrine of strict liability applies

8. Discuss the emerging concept of e-tort law

9. Outline the various remedies available in tort law

10.Discuss the wrongful death and survival statutes

Page 4: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-4

Question?Question?

What is a private wrong that injures another person’s physical well-being, emotional health, business, property, or reputation?

A. DutyB. CrimeC. FaultD. Tort

Page 5: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-5

Tort Law DefinedTort Law Defined

• Tort – a private wrong that injures another

person’s physical well-being, emotional health, business, property, or reputation

Page 6: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-6

Tort Law Versus Criminal LawTort Law Versus Criminal Law

• The primary purpose of tort law is to compensate for the injured party’s loss

• Another objective is to protect potential victims by deterring future tortious behavior

Page 7: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-7

Respondeat SuperiorRespondeat Superior

• Doctrine of respondeat superior (also referred to as vicarious liability) – may impose legal liability on employers

and make them pay for the torts committed by their employees within the scope of the employer’s business

Page 8: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-8

Question?Question?

What is an obligation placed on individuals because of the law?

A. TortB. AdmissionC. DutyD. Function

Page 9: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-9

The Element of DutyThe Element of Duty

• A Duty – an obligation placed on individuals

because of the law

Page 10: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-10

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

Page 11: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-11

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

• An Assault – occurs when the victim is placed in fear or

apprehension of immediate bodily harm by a tortfeasor who has the present apparent ability to inflict that harm

– No actual physical contact is needed for an assault

• A Battery – involves an offensive or harmful,

unprivileged touching

Page 12: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-12

Question?Question?

When one party prevents another party from moving about freely it is called _________.

A. DutyB. False imprisonmentC. TortD. Detention

Page 13: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-13

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

• False Imprisonment – When one party prevents another party

from moving about freely

• Defamation – Any false statement communicated to

others that harms a person’s good name or reputation

– Slander, libel

Page 14: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-14

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

• Disparagement – involves any false statement

communicated to others that somehow questions the quality of property or raises uncertainty as to who has legal ownership of that property

Page 15: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-15

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

• Fraudulent misrepresentation – occurs when false statements or actions,

or a combination thereof, are made by one party in a way that causes another party to rely on those misrepresentations and then suffers an injury or loss as a result.

Page 16: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-16

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

Invasion of Privacy• Revelation of confidential records• Intrusion• Creating a false light• Exploitation

Page 17: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-17

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

• Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress– Someone who intentionally or recklessly

causes another individual to undergo emotional or mental suffering will be responsible, even without an accompanying physical injury

– The actions complained of must be extreme and outrageous and cause severe emotional suffering

Page 18: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-18

Intentional TortsIntentional Torts

• Misuse of legal procedure – occurs when one person brings a legal

action with malice and without probable cause

– Wrongful civil proceedings– Malicious prosecution

Page 19: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-19

NegligenceNegligence

Elements of Negligence• Legal duty• Breach of duty• Proximate cause• Actual harm

Page 20: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-20

Elements of NegligenceElements of Negligence

Page 21: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-21

Question?Question?

Which defense of negligence involves the failure of the injured party to be careful enough to ensure his or her personal safety?

A. Assumption of the riskB. Comparative negligenceC. Contributory negligence D. Causative negligence

Page 22: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-22

Question?Question?

Which defense of negligence requires courts to assign damages according to the degree of fault of each party?

A. Assumption of the riskB. Comparative negligenceC. Contributory negligence D. Causative negligence

Page 23: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-23

Defenses to NegligenceDefenses to Negligence

• Contributory negligence – involves the failure of the injured party to be

careful enough to ensure his or her personal safety

• Comparative negligence – statutes that require courts to assign damages

according to the degree of fault of each party

• Assumption of the risk – involves the voluntary exposure of the victim

to a known risk

Page 24: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-24

Strict LiabilityStrict Liability

• Grounds for Strict Liability– court will hold a tortfeasor liable for

injuries to a victim even though the tortfeasor did not intend the harm and was not in any way negligent

– generally applied when the harm results from an ultra-hazardous or very dangerous activity

Page 25: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-25

Strict LiabilityStrict Liability

• Product liability – legal theory that imposes liability on the

manufacturer and seller of a product produced and sold in a defective condition

• A product in defective condition is unreasonably dangerous to the user, to the consumer, or to property

Page 26: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-26

Electronic TortsElectronic Torts

• An electronic tort – involves the invasion, distortion, theft,

falsification, misuse, destruction, or financial exploitation of information stored in or related to an electronic device, including but not limited to desktop PCs, laptops, mobile phones, mainframes, phonecams, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and home computers that stand alone or are part of a network

Page 27: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-27

Electronic TortsElectronic Torts

• E-defamation – the communication of false and destructive

information about an individual through the use of an electronic device

Page 28: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-28

Electronic TortsElectronic Torts

• E-Disparagement – involves any false statement

communicated to others on the Internet that in some way casts doubt on the quality of an item of property or a product offered for sale

• E-invasion of privacy – the unwelcome intrusion into private

matters initiated or maintained by an electronic device

Page 29: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-29

Remedies for TortsRemedies for Torts

• Economic compensatory damages – those that are directly quantifiable

• Noneconomic compensatory damages– those that result from injuries that are

intangible and therefore not directly quantifiable

• Punitive damages – designed to punish the tortfeasor so that

similar malicious actions are avoided by others

Page 30: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-30

Question?Question?

What is a court order preventing someone from performing a particular act?

A. SanctionB. InjunctionC. RulingD. Embargo

Page 31: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-31

Remedies for TortsRemedies for Torts

• An Injunction – a court order preventing someone from

performing a particular act

Page 32: Unit 6 Tort Law SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW/MUSOLINO

6-32

Survival StatutesSurvival Statutes

• Survival statutes allow a lawsuit to be brought even if both the plaintiff and the defendant are deceased

• Wrongful death statutes preserve the right to bring a lawsuit only if the death is caused by the negligence or intentional conduct of the person who caused the death