united states department of agricultural chemical usage ... · agricultural chemical usage 2002...
TRANSCRIPT
United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture
NationalAgriculturalStatisticsService
Ag Ch 1 (03)
Agricultural Chemical Usage2002 Field Crops Summary
May 2003
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 1 NASS, USDA
Table of Contents
Page
Narrative Table Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Corn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6
Durum Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 21
Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 31
Other Spring Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 25
Winter Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 52 Pest Management Practices - Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Corn, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Durum Wheat, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Other Spring Wheat, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Soybeans, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Winter Wheat, Pest Management Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Survey, Estimation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Survey Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Index of Active Ingredients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Report Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 2 NASS, USDA
Overview
The agricultural chemical use estimates in this report refer to on-farm use of commercial fertilizers andpesticides on targeted crops for the 2002 crop year. Farm and ranch operators were enumerated late inthe growing season after the farm operator had indicated that planned applications were completed. Thechemical use data were not summarized for geographical areas other than published in this report.
The data were compiled from the Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS) and from theObjective Yield Survey, with the main portion of data collection being conducted during the months ofOctober-December of 2002. Relevant portions of the survey instruments used in data collection areincluded in the back of this publication.
Targeted crops from the 2002 Objective Yield Survey included corn and durum, other spring, and winterwheat. Soybeans was the target crop from the ARMS.
Agricultural Chemical Use Survey Coverage, 2002
Crop
2002
StatesSurveyed
ReportsSummarized
U.S. AcreageIncl.
- Number -- Percent
Corn 7 1,250 65
Soybeans 20 2,526 97
Wheat, Durum 1 75 72
Wheat, OtherSpring
3 353 81
Wheat, Winter(Harvested)
10 1,006 75
This report excludes pesticides used for seed treatments and postharvest applications to the commodity. Spot treatments, which account for a very small percentage of total applications, are also excluded.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 3 NASS, USDA
Highlights
Corn: Nitrogen was applied to 96 percent of the 2002 corn planted acreage in the Program States:Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Nitrogen applications ranged from94 percent of the acreage treated in Illinois and Iowa to 99 percent in Indiana and Ohio. Corn growersused an average of 1.7 applications per acre while applying 83 pounds of nitrogen per treatment. Thiscomputes to a crop year rate per acre of 137 pounds per acre. In the Program States, 79 percent of thecorn planted acreage received a phosphate application, while potash was applied to 68 percent of theplanted acreage.
Herbicides were applied to 89 percent of the corn planted acreage in 2002. Atrazine continued to be themost widely applied herbicide with 62 percent of the planted acreage being treated. It was applied at arate of 1.04 pounds per acre. Acetochlor, S-Metolachlor, and Nicosulfuron were the next three mostwidely applied herbicides with 25, 15, and 13 percent of the planted corn acreage treated respectively.
In 2002, 24 percent of the corn planted acreage was treated with insecticides. Tefluthrin was the mostwidely applied insecticide, with 6 percent of the planted corn acreage treated in the Program States.
Soybeans: Producers in the Program States (Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, NorthDakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin) applied nitrogen fertilizer to 20percent of the soybean planted acreage. The percent of acres treated ranged from 2 percent in Louisianato 64 percent in North Dakota. The average number of nitrogen applications per acre was 1.1 with anaverage application rate of 19 pounds per acre. Phosphate was applied on 26 percent of the soybeanplanted acreage in the Program States. Producers in North Dakota applied phosphate to a high of 59percent of the soybean planted acreage, whereas Iowa producers applied phosphate to a low of only 7percent of the planted acreage. Potash was applied to 29 percent of the planted soybean planted acreagein the Program States.
In the Program States, 99 percent of the soybean planted acreage was treated with herbicides. The mostwidely used herbicides were Glyphosate; applied to 78 percent of the soybean acreage, followed byImazethapyr and Pendimethalin; each applied to 9 percent of the acreage, and Trifluralin; applied to 7percent of the planted acreage. Chlorimuron-ethyl and Sulfentrazone were both applied to 6 percent ofthe soybean planted acreage.
Producers in the Program States applied insecticides to 6 percent of the soybean planted acres. Louisiana producers applied insecticides to 72 percent of the planted acreage followed by Virginia at 46percent of the planted acreage. Fungicides were applied to less than 1 percent of the soybean plantedacreage in the Program States.
Durum Wheat: Nitrogen fertilizer was applied to 88 percent of the 2002 North Dakota planted acreage. Fertilizers with phosphate were applied to 58 percent of the planted acreage and 5 percent of the plantedacreage received potash applications. North Dakota producers treated 100 percent of the durum wheatplanted acreage with herbicides; 2,4-D was applied to 55 percent of the planted acreage followed byMCPA, Fenoxaprop, and Dicamba at 36, 22, and 21 percent respectively.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 4 NASS, USDA
Highlights (continued)
Other Spring Wheat: Nitrogen was applied to 86 percent of the 2002 other spring wheat plantedacreage in the Program States: Minnesota, Montana, and North Dakota. Phosphate was applied to74 percent of the planted acreage while potash was applied to 27 percent of the planted acreage in theProgram States. Spring wheat producers treated 91 percent of the other spring wheat planted acreagewith herbicides; MCPA was applied to 47 percent of the planted acreage followed by 2,4-D at 36percent.
Winter Wheat: Nitrogen was applied to 86 percent of the 2002 winter wheat harvested acreage in theProgram States: Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, andWashington. Winter wheat producers applied 68 pounds of nitrogen per acre for the crop year. In the Program States, 55 percent of the harvested winter wheat acreage received phosphate while potashwas applied to 15 percent of the harvested acreage.
Herbicides were applied to 38 percent of the 2002 winter wheat harvested acreage in the Program States. Metsulfuron-methyl and 2,4-D were both applied to 13 percent of the winter wheat harvested acreagefollowed by Chlorsulfuron at 10 percent.
Producers in the Program States treated 11 percent of the winter wheat harvested acreage withinsecticides. Zeta-cypermethrin was applied to 4 percent of the winter wheat harvested acreage whileChlorpyrifos, and Dimethoate were applied to 3 percent of the harvested acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 5 NASS, USDA
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 6 NASS, USDA
Corn: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied
State PlantedAcreage
Percent of Acres Treated and Total AppliedNitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,000 Acres Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs
IL IN IA MN NE OH WI
Total
11,2005,400
12,3007,2008,4003,2003,650
51,350
94999495979998
96
1,698.3786.7
1,408.0839.9
1,195.5500.1325.0
6,753.5
77927286708587
79
754.1350.4515.8330.1220.3183.2102.2
2,456.1
77846978217888
68
1,028.7567.1607.4344.832.3
283.1202.2
3,065.6
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 7 NASS, USDA
Corn: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
PlantedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Illinois Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Indiana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Iowa Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Minnesota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Nebraska Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Ohio Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Wisconsin Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Total Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
11,200
5,400
12,300
7,200
8,400
3,200
3,650
51,350
947777
999284
947269
958678
977021
998578
988788
967968
1.61.01.0
1.81.21.0
1.31.01.0
1.51.11.0
1.81.11.1
2.01.11.1
1.71.01.1
1.71.11.1
9983
115
7855
116
885670
774856
793316
765798
523154
835480
16187
119
14870
125
1225871
1225361
1463718
15867
113
913263
1376085
1,698.3754.1
1,028.7
786.7350.4567.1
1,408.0515.8607.4
839.9330.1344.8
1,195.5220.332.3
500.1183.2283.1
325.0102.2202.2
6,753.52,456.13,065.6
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 8 NASS, USDA
Corn: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL IL IN IA MN NE OH WI
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetic acid Acetochlor Alachlor Atrazine Bentazon Bromoxynil Butoxy. ester 2,4-D Carfentrazone-ethyl Clethodim Clopyralid Colleto. gloeospor. Cyanazine Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Dicamba, Sodium Salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P EPTC Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Foramsulfuron Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Halosulfuron Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Metribuzin Nicosulfuron Paraquat Pendimethalin Primisulfuron Prosulfuron Pyridate Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Trifluralin
PPPPPP *P *P *P *PPPPPPPPPP *PPP *PPPPPPPPPPPP *PPP * * *
P * *P *P
*
*
P
*PPPPPP *
P
* *P
PPPPP
P * *P * *PPP *
*P *P *P * *
* *P
PP *
*P
P
*P
PPP *P *P * *P *
*P * *
PP *P
P *P * *
P *
PPP *PPP *P * *PP
* * *PPP *P
P
PP
*
* * *P *P
P
*
P
PPP *PPP *P
PPP
P * *P
*P
PP *
*
PP
PPP
*
P
P
*PPP
PP
P
* *P * * * *PPP *P
PP *PP
* *
P
*P *P
* *
*
*PP * *PP *
P
P * *
P
P
P * * *
*PP
P
P *P
*
*
P
P *P
* * *
P
* *P * * * *
* *
P
P *
PP
*
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 9 NASS, USDA
Corn: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL IL IN IA MN NE OH WI
Insecticides Bifenthrin Bt (Bacillus thur.) Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorethoxyfos Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Ethoprop Fipronil Fonofos Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Permethrin Phorate Spinosad Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Mancozeb Propiconazole
P * *P *PPP * *P *PPP * *PPPP
* *
*
* *PP
*
*
P * *
PPP *
*
*
*PP
*P
*
*
PP *
P
P *
*
*
*
* *P *
*
*
* *
*
* * *
P *
*
PPP *
P
* *P
PPP *
*
*
* *
*
P *
* * * *
*
P *
* *
* *
* * *
P Usage data are published for this active ingredient.* Usage data are not published for this active ingredient.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 10 NASS, USDA
Corn: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,
Program States and Total, 2002
State PlantedAcreage
Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide 1 Fungicide Other
1,000 Acres Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs
ILINIA 2
MNNE 2
OHWI
Total 2
11,2005,400
12,3007,2008,4003,2003,650
51,350
90909196839181
89
25,15711,53522,48510,00212,869
8,4245,304
95,777
3639126
381420
24
1,088729432212986125356
3,931 1 Total Applied excludes Bt’s (Bacillus thuringiensis) and other biologicals. Quantities are not available because
amounts of active ingredient are not comparable between products. 2 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 11 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetic acid Acetochlor Alachlor Atrazine Bromoxynil Carfentrazone-ethyl Clopyralid Cyanazine Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Dicamba, Sodium Salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P EPTC Flumetsulam Foramsulfuron Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Halosulfuron Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Metribuzin Nicosulfuron Paraquat Pendimethalin Primisulfuron Prosulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine
42
*251
6222
11 *1165
*672
*12 *39
*11988
*13 *152
1115
3
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
0.450.390.391.732.161.040.290.010.100.810.200.110.370.130.051.110.763.590.040.030.310.640.030.0020.0070.070.091.520.100.020.591.200.020.0090.011.331.04
0.450.390.391.742.161.120.290.010.100.810.200.120.370.130.051.110.763.590.040.030.320.710.030.0020.0070.070.091.540.100.020.591.200.020.0090.011.331.04
1,018488152
22,5561,281
35,76227210
577132
1,12934093350
1434,186
6841,299
26813
5333,307
925
331367
6,58939
131136777521062
10,2301,583
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 12 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Insecticides Bifenthrin Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Dimethoate Fipronil Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Permethrin Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos Zeta-cypermethrin
2 *34
*32
*2461
*
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
0.060.930.940.0060.420.110.020.530.100.110.111.080.03
0.060.930.960.0060.420.110.020.530.100.110.111.080.03
59176
1,58111
125157179983
228334812
8* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Planted acres in 2002 for the 7 program states were 51.4 million acres.
States included are IL, IN, IA, MN, NE, OH and WI.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 13 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetochlor Atrazine Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Dicamba, Sodium Salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Lambda-cyhalothrin Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos
52372
595927
145422
10111111
48
165
3858
122
1.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.01.01.01.01.01.0
0.531.881.200.100.160.100.430.140.041.090.050.620.0020.0070.080.101.570.020.030.011.421.04
1.430.0060.020.110.111.01
0.531.911.360.100.160.100.430.140.041.090.050.720.0020.0070.080.101.570.020.030.011.421.04
1.430.0060.020.110.111.01
2894,890
11,00254
15160
4292633
1,65129
364( 2 )
186
1211,848
271010
2,488601
4445
1396
149208
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Illinois were 11.2 million acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 14 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Acetamide Acetochlor Atrazine Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Imazapyr Imazethapyr Isoxaflutole Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron S-Metolachlor
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Fipronil Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin
52378
7644
10655
13684
22
6878
10
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.01.01.01.01.0
0.451.901.260.100.120.101.220.090.630.0020.0070.061.610.020.031.23
0.870.0060.130.110.13
0.451.901.320.100.120.101.220.090.630.0020.0070.061.610.020.031.23
0.870.0060.130.110.13
1202,3245,547
374021
25452
21912
42538
85
1,467
2912
484766
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Indiana were 5.40 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 15 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetochlor Atrazine Bromoxynil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P Flumetsulam Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor
Insecticides Bifenthrin Chlorpyrifos Tefluthrin
43
2960
31411
84882
1458
15121114
51212
222
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
0.440.431.740.940.250.100.170.120.310.051.160.790.040.320.600.080.081.830.020.020.011.64
0.071.000.10
0.440.431.740.990.250.110.170.130.310.051.160.790.040.320.690.080.081.830.020.020.011.64
0.071.000.10
244160
6,1287,287
8018422513316853
1,08821670
211715147119
2,519311117
2,415
2128628
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Iowa were 12.3 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 16 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Acetochlor Atrazine Bromoxynil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Dimethenamid-P Flumetsulam Foramsulfuron Glufosinate-ammonium Glyphosate Mesotrione Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor
29374
1723
86744
1839
111127
722
6
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.0
1.580.580.320.100.250.120.300.051.590.920.040.030.310.660.080.020.020.011.78
1.580.590.320.100.250.120.300.051.590.920.040.030.310.730.080.020.020.011.78
3,2851,590
10112140563
12324
502292478
19657764359
18809
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Minnesota were 7.20 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 17 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetamide Acetochlor Alachlor Atrazine Carfentrazone-ethyl Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Dicamba, Pot. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Isoxaflutole Mesotrione Metolachlor Nicosulfuron Primisulfuron Prosulfuron Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor
Insecticides Bifenthrin Chlorpyrifos Cyfluthrin Dimethoate Fipronil Permethrin Tebupirimphos Tefluthrin Terbufos
44
232
64495323698
11798778
20
346473693
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.01.11.01.01.01.11.01.01.0
0.510.311.541.950.910.010.090.320.110.390.050.760.030.670.050.081.160.020.020.010.010.88
0.050.740.0050.420.090.100.110.101.01
0.510.311.571.950.990.010.090.320.110.390.050.760.030.730.050.081.220.020.020.010.010.88
0.050.820.0050.420.090.110.110.101.01
150102
2,985408
5,3565
63129297112
36223
5034649
935141368
1,466
14307
312553255276
223 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Nebraska were 8.40 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 18 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetochlor Atrazine Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Diflufenzopyr-sodium Dimethenamid Flumetsulam Glyphosate Isoxaflutole Metolachlor Nicosulfuron S-Metolachlor Simazine
Insecticides Permethrin
11297986664
20595
2418
6
1.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.0
1.0
0.421.971.340.180.120.051.240.050.650.071.110.021.290.99
0.10
0.421.971.360.200.120.051.240.050.650.071.110.031.290.99
0.10
1401,8143,444
492110
2366
42211
3104
997555
19 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Ohio were 3.20 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 19 NASS, USDA
Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetochlor Atrazine Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Pot. salt Flumetsulam Glyphosate Nicosulfuron Pendimethalin Rimsulfuron S-Metolachlor
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos
621472519
7271817
71410
5
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.0
0.391.500.900.120.180.420.040.740.021.270.011.60
0.48
0.391.500.900.120.190.420.040.780.021.270.011.60
0.48
861,1301,537
10512910340
50712
3135
588
82 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Wisconsin were 3.65 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 20 NASS, USDA
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 21 NASS, USDA
Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied
State PlantedAcreage
Percent of Acres Treated and Total AppliedNitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,000 Acres Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs
ND 2,100 88 116.1 58 31.6 5 1.2
Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
PlantedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
North Dakota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
2,10088585
1.61.01.0
402612
622612
116.131.61.2
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 22 NASS, USDA
Durum Wheat: Active IngredientsPublication Status
Active Ingredient ND
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt Acetic acid Bromoxynil Bromoxynil octanoate Clodinafop-propargil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Prosulfuron Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
Fungicides Propiconazole Trifloxystrobin
P * *P *P *P *P * *PPP * *P * *PP
* *
P Usage data are published for this active ingredient.* Usage data are not published for this active ingredient.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 23 NASS, USDA
Durum Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,
North Dakota, 2002
State PlantedAcreage
Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide Fungicide Other
1,000 Acres Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs
ND 1 2,100 100 1,238 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.
Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Clodinafop-propargil Dicamba Fenoxaprop Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
55101221226
1436
71814
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
0.330.210.050.050.050.140.450.350.0080.0060.36
0.330.210.050.050.050.140.450.360.0080.0060.36
3824412222418
128273
12
103 1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Dakota were 2.10 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 24 NASS, USDA
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 25 NASS, USDA
Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied
State PlantedAcreage
Percent of Acres Treated and Total AppliedNitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,000 Acres Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs
MN MT ND
Total
2,0003,7506,900
12,650
896697
86
129.097.8
499.8
726.6
835483
74
60.847.0
197.7
305.5
682119
27
44.714.930.6
90.2
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 26 NASS, USDA
Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
PlantedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Minnesota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Montana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
North Dakota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Total Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
2,000
3,750
6,900
12,650
898368
665421
978319
867427
1.11.01.0
1.21.01.0
1.61.01.0
1.41.01.0
623632
332319
463424
463127
733733
402319
753524
633227
129.060.844.7
97.847.014.9
499.8197.730.6
726.6305.590.2
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 27 NASS, USDA
Other Spring Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL MN MT ND
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Bromoxynil Bromoxynil octanoate Chlorsulfuron Clodinafop-propargil Clopyralid Dicamba Dicamba, Dimet. salt Difenzoquat Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate
Fungicides Propiconazole Tebuconazole
PPPPPPPP * *P *PPPPPP * * *P *PP *
* *
PP
P *P *
P * *
P * * *PP
P
P
P *
P *P
PP
P
P
* *PPP * * * *P *PP *
P *P *
P * * * *P *PPPP
*
P *
P *
* *
* *
P Usage data are published for this active ingredient.* Usage data are not published for this active ingredient.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 28 NASS, USDA
Other Spring Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,
Program States and Total, 2002
State PlantedAcreage
Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide Fungicide Other
1,000 Acres Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs
MNMTND 1
Total 1
2,0003,7506,900
12,650
848995
91
8582,1713,749
6,778
8
8
6
15
53
68 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.
Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Bromoxynil Bromoxynil octanoate Chlorsulfuron Clodinafop-propargil Clopyralid Dicamba Fenoxaprop Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
Fungicides Propiconazole Tebuconazole
363
242182
1829
53
1547
72
104
12
23
1.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.41.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.01.1
0.340.460.240.290.010.040.080.050.060.070.130.440.310.0040.010.010.010.006
0.090.09
0.390.460.240.290.010.040.080.050.060.070.130.630.310.0040.010.010.010.006
0.090.10
1,785146716641
4621
1202394442
1,2351,808
33
1469
2543
1 Planted acres in 2002 for the 3 program states were 12.7 million acres.States included are MN, MT and ND.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 29 NASS, USDA
Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Clodinafop-propargil Fenoxaprop Glyphosate MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
Fungicides Propiconazole
20355
306
5387
5
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.0
0.430.240.050.070.660.330.010.007
0.08
0.440.240.050.070.660.330.010.007
0.08
171170
54275
35121
7 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Minnesota were 2.00 million acres.
Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Chlorsulfuron Clodinafop-propargil Dicamba Fenoxaprop Glyphosate MCPA Metsulfuron-methyl Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
6584
13324
1915225
137
1.21.01.01.01.11.01.81.01.01.01.01.0
0.340.220.010.050.050.050.410.280.0040.0080.010.005
0.410.220.010.050.050.050.740.280.0040.0080.010.005
997661
22669
533155
3161
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Montana were 3.75 million acres.
Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Clodinafop-propargil Fenoxaprop Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
26307
4274
16621316
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
0.340.230.040.060.070.130.560.300.010.006
0.340.230.040.060.070.130.560.300.010.006
61748019
1893137
6281,302
117
1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Dakota were 6.90 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 30 NASS, USDA
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 31 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied
State PlantedAcreage
Percent of Acres Treated and Total AppliedNitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,000 Acres Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs
AR IL IN IA KS KY LA MD MI MN MS MO NE NC ND OH SD TN VA WI
Total
2,95010,550
5,80010,400
2,7501,290
790490
2,0507,2001,4405,0504,7001,3602,6704,7504,2501,160
4801,540
71,670
71818
32421
223441112133136642037422540
20
5.237.517.49.3
12.29.60.12.7
24.416.13.7
11.823.114.444.114.132.514.53.69.2
305.5
3625247
25371817341220293636592741473335
26
57.8143.167.948.328.730.35.52.9
32.034.215.862.979.925.050.562.6
102.031.17.3
18.9
906.7
353846128
381826671020361141115615574648
29
66.1422.6276.0163.7
5.946.67.57.0
119.139.125.7
158.114.651.33.3
276.424.448.618.454.7
1,829.1
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 32 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
PlantedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Arkansas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Illinois Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Indiana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Iowa Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Kansas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Kentucky Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Louisiana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Maryland Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Michigan Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Minnesota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
2,950
10,550
5,800
10,400
2,750
1,290
790
490
2,050
7,200
73635
182538
182446
37
12
24258
213738
21818
231726
443467
111210
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.11.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
245462
2054
105
1748
102
2670
120
174326
316495
114054
223555
264682
203852
245563
2054
105
1748
104
2670
127
184326
356495
114054
243555
274687
203852
5.257.866.1
37.5143.1422.6
17.467.9
276.0
9.348.3
163.7
12.228.75.9
9.630.346.6
0.15.57.5
2.72.97.0
24.432.0
119.1
16.134.239.1
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 33 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
PlantedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Mississippi Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Missouri Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Nebraska Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
North Carolina Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
North Dakota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Ohio Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
South Dakota Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Tennessee Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Virginia Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Wisconsin Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,440
5,050
4,700
1,360
2,670
4,750
4,250
1,160
480
1,540
122020
132936
313611
363641
645911
202756
374115
424757
253346
403548
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.31.01.0
1.11.01.0
1.11.01.4
1.11.01.0
1.01.01.0
1.01.01.0
225688
184487
154528
295191
193211
1349
103
185427
275473
294480
143573
225688
184487
164728
295191
263212
1549
103
205839
305773
294683
153573
3.715.825.7
11.862.9
158.1
23.179.914.6
14.425.051.3
44.150.53.3
14.162.6
276.4
32.5102.024.4
14.531.148.6
3.67.3
18.4
9.218.954.7
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 34 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
PlantedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Total Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
71,670202629
1.11.01.0
194887
214989
305.5906.7
1,829.1
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 35 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL AR IL IN IA KS KY LA
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DB, Dimeth. Salt Acetamide Acetic acid Acifluorfen Alachlor Atrazine Bentazon Butoxy. ester 2,4-D Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Clomazone Cloransulam-methyl Dicamba Dichlorprop Dimethenamid Ethalfluralin Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Flumioxazin Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Halosulfuron Imazamox Imazaquin Imazaquin, sod. salt Imazethapyr Lactofen Linuron MCPA Metolachlor Metribuzin Oxyfluorfen Paraquat Pendimethalin Quizalofop-P-ethyl Quizalofop-ethyl S-Metolachlor Sethoxydim Simazine Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin Vernolate
PPPPPP *P *PPPPP * * *PPPPPPPPP *PPPPP * *PP *PPP *PP *PPPPP *
*
*
* *
*
* *
*P *
*
*
* *
* *
*
*
*
P
PP
* *
*PP
P * *
PP * * *PPP
P *
PP
*
*P
* * *P * *PP
P
* * *
*
*P * * *
*
PP
*PPP
*P
P
P
*P *
* *
P * *
*
* *P *
*
P *
P
PP * *
PPP
* *
P *
* *
*P *
*P
P * *
P
P
*
*
* * *
* *
*
* *
PP
*
P
P
*P
* *
* * *
*
P *
*
*
* * *
*
* *
* *P *
* *
P *
* *
* * * *
* *
*P *
*
P *
*
* * *
*P * *
P *
* * *PP
* *
*P
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 36 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL AR IL IN IA KS KY LA
Insecticides Acephate Aldicarb Benzoic acid Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cypermethrin Dicrotophos Diflubenzuron Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Helicoverpa zea NPV Indoxacarb Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methomyl Methyl parathion Permethrin Phorate Thiodicarb Tralomethrin Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Azoxystrobin Sulfur Thiophanate-methyl
Other Chemicals Sodium chlorate
* *PP *P * *PPP * *P * *PP *P *P
P * *
*
*
* *
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
P *
*
*
*
*
P
* * *P
*
P *
P
P *P
P
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 37 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Active IngredientsPublication Status
By Program States, 2002 (continued)
Active IngredientProgram States
MD MI MN MS MO NE NC
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DB, Dimeth. Salt Acetamide Acetic acid Acifluorfen Alachlor Atrazine Bentazon Butoxy. ester 2,4-D Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Clomazone Cloransulam-methyl Dicamba Dichlorprop Dimethenamid Ethalfluralin Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Flumioxazin Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Halosulfuron Imazamox Imazaquin Imazaquin, sod. salt Imazethapyr Lactofen Linuron MCPA Metolachlor Metribuzin Oxyfluorfen Paraquat Pendimethalin Quizalofop-P-ethyl Quizalofop-ethyl S-Metolachlor Sethoxydim Simazine Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin Vernolate
*
*
*
* *
*
*
PP
*
*
* *
P *
*
* * * * *
*
*
*
*
*
* * *
* *
*PP
* *
P
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
PP * *
PPP
P
P *
*
P
* *
*
P *P
P *
*P *
*
P * *P
* * * *
*P *
P *
*
*
*
P *
* *
P
P
* *
*
P *
P
* * *P * *PP
*
*
*
P *
* *
P * * * *
*
*
*P
P * * *
*
* * * *
*PP
*
P *
*P
*P *
P
* * *
P
*
*
*
*
* *
P
* *
P
*
PP
*
*
*
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 38 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Active IngredientsPublication Status
By Program States, 2002 (continued)
Active IngredientProgram States
MD MI MN MS MO NE NC
Insecticides Acephate Aldicarb Benzoic acid Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cypermethrin Dicrotophos Diflubenzuron Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Helicoverpa zea NPV Indoxacarb Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methomyl Methyl parathion Permethrin Phorate Thiodicarb Tralomethrin Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Azoxystrobin Sulfur Thiophanate-methyl
Other Chemicals Sodium chlorate
*
*
*
*
*
P
*
*
*
P
P
*
P
*
P
*
*
*
* *
*
*
P
P
*
*
*
*
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 39 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Active IngredientsPublication Status
By Program States, 2002 (continued)
Active IngredientProgram States
ND OH SD TN VA WI
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DB, Dimeth. Salt Acetamide Acetic acid Acifluorfen Alachlor Atrazine Bentazon Butoxy. ester 2,4-D Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Clomazone Cloransulam-methyl Dicamba Dichlorprop Dimethenamid Ethalfluralin Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Flumioxazin Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Halosulfuron Imazamox Imazaquin Imazaquin, sod. salt Imazethapyr Lactofen Linuron MCPA Metolachlor Metribuzin Oxyfluorfen Paraquat Pendimethalin Quizalofop-P-ethyl Quizalofop-ethyl S-Metolachlor Sethoxydim Simazine Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin Vernolate
*
P
*
*
P * * *
*P *
P
P *
*
P *
P
* *
P
P *
* * *
*P * * *
* * *
PP
* *
P *
*P
P *
*
P * * * *
*
* *
*
* *
* *PP
*
*
P
* * *
*
*
*
PP * *
*P *
* *P *
*
* *
*
P *
* *
* * * * *
* *
*
P
*
P
*
PP
*
P
* *
PP
* *
P
*
P
*
* *
*
* * *
PP
P
P
* *
P *
*
*
*
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 40 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Active IngredientsPublication Status
By Program States, 2002 (continued)
Active IngredientProgram States
ND OH SD TN VA WI
Insecticides Acephate Aldicarb Benzoic acid Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cypermethrin Dicrotophos Diflubenzuron Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Helicoverpa zea NPV Indoxacarb Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methomyl Methyl parathion Permethrin Phorate Thiodicarb Tralomethrin Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Azoxystrobin Sulfur Thiophanate-methyl
Other Chemicals Sodium chlorate
*
* *
*
*
*
P
*
P
* * *
*
*P *
* * *
*
*
*
P Usage data are published for this active ingredient.* Usage data are not published for this active ingredient.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 41 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,
Program States and Total, 2002
State PlantedAcreage
Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide Fungicide Other
1,000 Acres Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs
AR 1
IL 1
IN 1
IAKS 1
KYLAMDMI 1
MN 1
MS 1
MONENCND 1
OH 1
SDTN 1
VAWI 1
Total 1
2,95010,550
5,80010,400
2,7501,290
790490
2,0507,2001,4405,0504,7001,3602,6704,7504,2501,160
4801,540
71,670
90100100
9998
100989898999899
10095
100100100100
9486
99
2,94512,939
7,85313,143
2,9311,4791,257
7532,4967,0732,3925,9246,0141,3613,3506,3655,1171,496
5911,253
86,742
14
9
723
24
425
191046
6
112
58
470
24
3689
971
25
1,077
14
*
8
108* Applied on less than one percent of acres. 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 42 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DB, Dimeth. Salt Acetamide Acetic acid Acifluorfen Alachlor Bentazon Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Clomazone Cloransulam-methyl Ethalfluralin Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Flumetsulam Flumiclorac-pentyl Flumioxazin Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazaquin Imazaquin, sod. salt Imazethapyr Lactofen Metolachlor Metribuzin Paraquat Pendimethalin Quizalofop-P-ethyl S-Metolachlor Sethoxydim Sulfentrazone Sulfosate Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
5 * *12
*2
*62
*5
*23
* * *3
78521
*9
* *329
*22612
*7
1.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.41.41.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.01.01.01.01.51.01.11.0
0.400.030.170.400.251.250.960.0040.020.080.320.020.800.130.060.040.030.070.240.740.700.030.080.060.050.081.470.220.410.940.061.120.300.131.110.0030.0050.92
0.400.040.170.400.261.270.960.0040.020.080.320.020.800.130.060.040.030.070.241.071.000.030.080.060.050.091.470.230.480.950.061.140.300.131.670.0040.0060.93
1,3443
22328325802
1,1381
761451067169
215107121618
54659,9623,854
47822
34160
573440612
6,13225
1,355460531
1,57542
4,385See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 43 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Insecticides Benzoic acid Carbaryl Chlorpyrifos Diflubenzuron Dimethoate Esfenvalerate Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Permethrin Thiodicarb Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Azoxystrobin
* * * * * *2
* * * *
*
1.01.21.01.01.11.11.01.31.01.21.0
1.0
0.060.880.620.040.380.030.020.590.070.320.04
0.07
0.061.070.630.040.440.030.020.780.080.410.04
0.07
1373
1875
471131
382546817
25* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Planted acres in 2002 for the 20 program states were 71.7 million acres.
States included are AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, ND, OH, SD, TN, VA and WI.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 44 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Glyphosate 80 1.6 0.63 1.04 2,447 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Arkansas were 2.95 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Cloransulam-methyl Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazethapyr Lactofen Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
1332755333
8156
1018711
1.01.01.01.01.01.21.01.01.01.41.61.01.01.41.01.01.01.0
0.380.440.160.020.060.020.120.050.280.730.780.030.050.111.140.120.0051.06
0.380.440.160.020.060.020.120.050.281.021.240.030.050.151.150.120.0051.06
518162
35143211351880
8,803618
195921
96392
1148
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Illinois were 10.6 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorimuron-ethyl Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazaquin Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone
811
552
8994
10547
1.01.01.01.01.01.41.11.01.01.01.01.0
0.300.020.150.050.270.840.800.070.060.160.920.11
0.300.020.150.050.271.220.930.070.060.160.920.11
13611411336
6,273470
173346
20841
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Indiana were 5.80 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 45 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Cloransulam-methyl Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Pendimethalin Sethoxydim Sulfentrazone Trifluralin
Insecticides Permethrin
45
10446
733
1119
35
18
4
1.01.01.01.01.01.01.31.11.01.01.01.01.0
1.0
0.160.0090.020.120.040.250.710.790.060.930.220.220.89
0.08
0.160.0090.020.130.040.250.990.940.060.940.220.220.91
0.08
615
235318
1687,497
25968
1,85775
1131,679
38 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Iowa were 10.4 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin
782
7578
1.01.41.41.01.21.0
0.330.670.580.050.200.94
0.330.960.820.050.250.94
642,171
1577
47194
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Kansas were 2.75 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kentucky, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Glyphosate Imazethapyr
11877
1.01.31.0
0.440.800.04
0.441.080.04
631,213
4 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Kentucky were 1.29 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 46 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Louisiana, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Glyphosate Imazaquin Paraquat Pendimethalin Sulfosate
Insecticides Benzoic acid Diflubenzuron Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Thiodicarb Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Azoxystrobin
21277
6638
1593
561210
14
1.41.21.91.01.01.01.8
1.11.01.01.31.51.1
1.0
0.330.020.770.090.340.871.04
0.060.040.030.600.370.04
0.07
0.470.021.540.090.340.871.92
0.070.040.030.820.570.05
0.07
82
9374
1822
119
831
360564
8 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Louisiana were 790,000 acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Maryland, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Paraquat
722011
1.31.01.0
0.990.640.41
1.360.680.41
4826523
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Maryland were 490,000 acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr
829
12
1.21.31.0
0.860.710.06
1.060.920.06
1,79116314
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Michigan were 2.05 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 47 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Fenoxaprop Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazethapyr Pendimethalin Thifensulfuron Trifluralin
447
7096
1092
14
1.01.01.01.21.71.01.01.01.01.0
0.100.040.200.740.670.020.050.910.0030.77
0.100.040.200.901.160.020.050.910.0030.77
301395
4,5167321038
561( 2 )
761 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Minnesota were 7.20 million acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Mississippi, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acifluorfen Chlorimuron-ethyl Cloransulam-methyl Glyphosate Imazaquin Pendimethalin Trifluralin
Insecticides Benzoic acid Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion
Fungicides Azoxystrobin
6742
86643
613
2
9
1.01.31.41.02.21.01.01.0
1.01.11.1
1.0
0.840.200.0050.020.710.090.890.98
0.050.020.36
0.06
0.840.270.0080.021.620.090.891.04
0.050.030.40
0.06
78261
( 2 )2,013
85042
55
10
8 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Mississippi were 1.44 million acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 48 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorimuron-ethyl Cloransulam-methyl Flumiclorac-pentyl Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Paraquat Sulfentrazone
6893
8464
11
1.01.21.01.01.31.21.81.0
0.520.020.020.040.770.780.350.14
0.520.020.020.041.030.950.630.14
160996
4,32827912277
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Missouri were 5.05 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Alachlor Chlorimuron-ethyl Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin S-Metolachlor Trifluralin
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos
36
781314
317
45
*
1.01.01.31.51.01.01.01.01.0
1.1
1.170.020.730.670.050.260.850.770.72
0.52
1.170.021.001.040.050.260.860.770.72
0.59
1926
3,6616313533
671162166
26* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Nebraska were 4.70 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Carolina, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Glyphosate Imazethapyr Paraquat Pendimethalin
Insecticides Esfenvalerate Lambda-cyhalothrin
915
143
414
1.31.01.01.0
1.01.0
0.710.040.390.53
0.030.02
0.980.040.390.53
0.030.02
1,2083
7722
24
1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Carolina were 1.36 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 49 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Bentazon Ethalfluralin Glyphosate Imazamox Imazethapyr Pendimethalin Sethoxydim Trifluralin
243
501015112515
1.01.01.51.01.01.01.01.0
1.480.800.600.030.041.240.360.94
1.480.800.900.030.041.240.360.94
93969
1,2028
17367240369
1 Planted acres in 2002 for North Dakota were 2.67 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorimuron-ethyl Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazethapyr Metribuzin Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone
41689
3483
14
1.01.01.61.51.01.01.01.0
0.530.020.800.660.050.220.680.08
0.530.021.301.040.050.220.680.08
10616
5,48017210799658
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Ohio were 4.75 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Pendimethalin
Insecticides Lambda-cyhalothrin
7239
12
1.51.41.0
1.0
0.710.680.99
0.02
1.100.950.99
0.02
3,359120371
10 1 Planted acres in 2002 for South Dakota were 4.25 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 50 NASS, USDA
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Tennessee, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Chlorimuron-ethyl Clethodim Fluazifop-P-butyl Glyphosate Paraquat
Insecticides Lambda-cyhalothrin
15134
952
10
1.01.01.01.51.0
1.0
0.0060.120.110.710.40
0.01
0.0070.120.111.130.40
0.01
1185
1,24212
2 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Tennessee were 1.16 million acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Virginia, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Chlorimuron-ethyl Fluazifop-P-butyl Fomesafen Glyphosate Imazethapyr Paraquat Pendimethalin Sulfentrazone
Insecticides Lambda-cyhalothrin
7111083
4886
17
1.01.11.11.41.01.01.21.0
1.2
0.030.180.350.720.050.530.590.17
0.02
0.030.200.391.040.050.530.710.17
0.03
11120
4151
22265
2 1 Planted acres in 2002 for Virginia were 480,000 acres.
Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Glyphosate Glyphosate diam salt Imazamox Imazethapyr Pendimethalin
565
45
2711
1.01.31.21.01.01.0
0.420.670.580.040.040.88
0.420.920.730.040.040.88
34924483
18154
1 Planted acres in 2002 for Wisconsin were 1.54 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 51 NASS, USDA
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 52 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2002 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Amount Applied
State HarvestedAcreage
Percent of Acres Treated and Total AppliedNitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,000 Acres Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs Pct Mil. Lbs
CO IL KS MO MT NE OH OK TX WA
Total
1,650650
8,100760750
1,520810
3,5002,7001,750
22,190
64969197887998926299
86
55.159.4
487.465.938.457.666.4
203.6124.0126.5
1,284.3
31766475814589592839
55
18.237.0
162.231.818.522.646.865.930.312.3
445.6
*748
74464
8847
11
15
0.046.824.540.84.82.1
51.46.45.43.5
185.7
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 53 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
HarvestedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Colorado Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Illinois Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Kansas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Missouri Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Montana Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Nebraska Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Ohio Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Oklahoma Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Texas Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
Washington Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
1,650
650
8,100
760
750
1,520
810
3,500
2,700
1,750
64310
967674
91648
977574
888146
79454
988988
92594
62287
993911
1.21.00.0
1.71.01.0
1.41.01.0
1.61.01.0
1.51.01.0
1.41.01.0
1.81.01.0
1.51.01.0
1.41.01.0
1.31.01.0
4435
547397
453136
535573
393013
343331
466071
413241
523829
531718
5335
957597
663136
895573
583014
483331
846572
643241
744029
731818
55.118.20.0
59.437.046.8
487.4162.224.5
65.931.840.8
38.418.54.8
57.622.62.1
66.446.851.4
203.665.96.4
124.030.35.4
126.512.33.5
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 54 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2002
PrimaryNutrient
HarvestedAcreage
AreaApplied
Applic-ations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre Mil. Lbs
Total Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
22,190865515
1.51.01.0
453653
683754
1,284.3445.6185.7
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 55 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL CO IL KS MO MT
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Acetic acid Atrazine Bromoxynil Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorsulfuron Clopyralid Dicamba Diclofop-methyl Difenzoquat Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate Imazamethabenz MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Paraquat Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Tralkoxydim Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Disulfoton Imidacloprid Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methyl parathion Zeta-cypermethrin
P *P *P *P *P * * * * *PP *PPP *PPPP * *PP *
PP * *P *PP
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
P
P
*
*
P *
P
P
P
* *P
*P *
P *
* *
*
P
*
*
P
P
*
*
P
*
* * * *P
*
* *P
*
P
P
* *P *
*
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 56 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status
By Program States, 2002
Active IngredientProgram States
ALL CO IL KS MO MT
Fungicides Mancozeb Propiconazole Thiophanate-methyl Trifloxystrobin
*P * *
* *
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 57 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Active IngredientsPublication Status
By Program States, 2002 (continued)
Active IngredientProgram States
NE OH OK TX WA
Herbicides 2,4-D 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Acetic acid Atrazine Bromoxynil Carfentrazone-ethyl Chlorsulfuron Clopyralid Dicamba Diclofop-methyl Difenzoquat Fenoxaprop Flucarbazone-sodium Fluroxypyr Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate Imazamethabenz MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Paraquat Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Tralkoxydim Triallate Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl Trifluralin
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Disulfoton Imidacloprid Lambda-cyhalothrin Malathion Methyl parathion Zeta-cypermethrin
P
*
*
P
*
P *
* * *
P *
*
*
P
*
*
P
*
P
P
P
*
P
*
*
P
P
PP
* *P *
P
*
*
P
*
P * *
PP
*
*
P
* *P *P * * * * * * * *P *PPP
PPP
*PP
*
See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 58 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Active IngredientsPublication Status
By Program States, 2002 (continued)
Active IngredientProgram States
NE OH OK TX WA
Fungicides Mancozeb Propiconazole Thiophanate-methyl Trifloxystrobin
* * * * *
P Usage data are published for this active ingredient.* Usage data are not published for this active ingredient.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 59 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Pesticide, Harvested Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied,
Program States and Total, 2002
State HarvestedAcreage
Area Receiving and Total AppliedHerbicide Insecticide Fungicide Other
1,000 Acres Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs Pct 1,000 Lbs
CO 1
IL 1
KSMO 1
MT 1
NE 1
OHOKTXWA 1
Total
1,650650
8,100760750
1,520810
3,5002,7001,750
22,190
12393212804931363487
38
6810
34712
433225
72155274856
2,456
7
3221
11
30
285291
665
3
*
37
42* Applied on less than one percent of acres. 1 Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Acetic acid Bromoxynil Chlorsulfuron Dicamba Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Glyphosate MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Lambda-cyhalothrin Methyl parathion Zeta-cypermethrin
Fungicides Propiconazole
13 *2
102
*341
13 *16445
33
* *4
*
1.11.01.01.01.01.01.81.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
1.01.01.11.11.0
1.0
0.370.470.210.010.030.100.400.300.170.0030.020.010.030.010.010.006
0.420.280.020.360.03
0.10
0.410.470.220.010.040.100.730.310.170.0030.020.010.030.010.010.007
0.430.280.020.410.03
0.10
1,19656862520
7541241
44913
391314
7
289156
39024
11* Area applied is less than one percent. 1 Harvested acres in 2002 for the 10 program states were 22.2 million acres. States included are CO, IL, KS, MO, MT, NE, OH, OK,
TX and WA.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 60 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
3636
1.01.0
0.020.008
0.020.008
42
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Illinois were 650,000 acres.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorsulfuron Dicamba Glyphosate Metsulfuron-methyl Sulfosulfuron Triasulfuron
Insecticides Zeta-cypermethrin
618
32
1633
7
1.11.01.12.21.01.01.0
1.0
0.310.010.020.340.0020.030.008
0.02
0.360.010.020.760.0020.030.008
0.02
162165
131392
14 1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Kansas were 8.10 million acres.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
1211
1.01.0
0.020.009
0.020.009
21
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Missouri were 760,000 acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 61 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Dicamba Glyphosate Metsulfuron-methyl Picloram Triasulfuron
5613301798
1.21.02.01.01.01.0
0.340.080.360.0040.020.01
0.410.080.740.0040.020.01
1758
168111
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Montana were 750,000 acres.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Dicamba Metsulfuron-methyl Triasulfuron
317
1314
1.01.01.01.0
0.310.060.0040.02
0.310.060.0040.02
142613
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Nebraska were 1.52 million acres.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D MCPA Thifensulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
14787
1.01.01.01.0
0.350.350.020.007
0.350.350.020.007
40201
( 2 ) 1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Ohio were 810,000 acres. 2 Total applied is less than 1,000 lbs.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 62 NASS, USDA
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oklahoma, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Chlorsulfuron Metsulfuron-methyl Sulfosulfuron
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate Methyl parathion
8181913
766
1.11.01.01.0
1.01.01.1
0.300.010.0030.03
0.300.320.36
0.330.010.0030.03
0.300.320.41
9372
14
786990
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Oklahoma were 3.50 million acres.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Metsulfuron-methyl Triasulfuron
Insecticides Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate
177
13
138
1.01.01.0
1.01.0
0.520.0040.02
0.510.23
0.520.0040.02
0.540.23
23316
19749
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Texas were 2.70 million acres.
Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2002 1
ActiveIngredient
AreaApplied
Appli-cations
Rate perApplication
Rate perCrop Year
TotalApplied
Percent Number Pounds per Acre Pounds per Acre 1,000 Lbs
Herbicides 2,4-D Bromoxynil Chlorsulfuron Glyphosate MCPA Metribuzin Metsulfuron-methyl Prosulfuron Sulfosulfuron Thifensulfuron Triasulfuron Tribenuron-methyl
33227
113512208
27254
24
1.11.01.01.31.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.1
0.490.200.010.470.280.170.0050.010.030.010.020.005
0.550.220.010.650.290.170.0050.010.030.010.020.005
318832
1271793822
14512
1 Harvested acres in 2002 for Washington were 1.75 million acres.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 63 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices - Highlights
The 2002 survey results showed comparatively similar trends compared with 2001 in terms of whichpest management practices were reported at high levels for corn and soybeans. Durum, other spring, andwinter wheat were last surveyed in 1999 and were published at the all wheat level.
The question for “weather monitoring” changed between 2001 and 2002 for soybeans from monitoring“to predict the need for pesticide application” to monitoring “to determine when to make pesticideapplications”. Therefore, data between years in not comparable.
The question for “scouting” was also changed between 2001 and 2002 for soybeans from “using asystematic method ” to “systematic sampling or counting”. Therefore, data between years in notcomparable.
Corn: Most pest management practices increased from 2001 for corn in the prevention, avoidance,monitoring and suppression categories. The percent of farms reporting prevention practices increasedfor virtually all practices in the 7 states surveyed.
Soybeans: As producers continue to increase the percent of soybean acreage planted to biotech varietieswith herbicide resistance (now ranging from 61 - 89 percent of total acres planted in the states surveyed),the need for pest management practices to control weeds declines.
Wheat, Durum: Producers in North Dakota reported a high level of scouting at 71 percent of farms. Rotating crops to control pests and cleaning implements after fieldwork were the next two most commonpractices reported by 68 and 55 percent of farms respectively.
Wheat Other Spring: Cleaning implements after fieldwork and rotating crops to control pests were thetwo most common practices; reported by 67 and 65 percent of farms respectively.
Wheat, Winter: Cleaning implements after fieldwork was reported by 45 percent of farms in theProgram States. Scouting was reported by 29 percent of farms in the Program States.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 64 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Corn, 2002
PracticeStates
IL IN IA MNPercent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
66333114
99311
4113251923
219
121056
35102713
2758
251312162
82
22
28
3317329
9805
3411141113
1111
161247
4051502
68024
2311868
56
255
44
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 65 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Corn, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates Program
StatesNE OH WIPercent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms Percent of Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
56164320
86912
4929161113
2116
257
50
3221348
59011
3011236
13
64
167
36
1914163
11583
23884
11
63
32
34
4126349
87811
3213141012
118
157
44
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 66 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Corn, 2002
PracticeStates
IL IN IA MNPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Biotech varieties with insect resistance only Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Biotech varieties with stacked gene Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
65303313
189
9116
4815282226
3
12410
111157
36112916
74
757
271518154
6
*122
34
35
40203014
3112798
3813221718
7
31412
141442
4044435
294
8512
3017201510
11
41410
108
43* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 67 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Corn, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates Program
StatesNE OH WIPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Biotech varieties with insect resistance only Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Biotech varieties with stacked gene Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
55204020
345
6712
492714129
9
42316
277
48
45253713
6118917
349
251018
3
*83
99
40
2212195
1510676
3213147
12
9
294
63
42
47253413
( 1 )8
8011
3916211615
( 1 )
( 1 )1710
139
46* Less than one percent. 1 State data not available.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 68 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Durum and Other Spring Wheat, 2002Durum Other Spring
PracticeStates Program
StatesND MN MT NDPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
2329552
346829
715
142
14
6
119
41
4644556
77524
4821189
21
20
231449
1159731
12489
59111537
3
221070
48327410
199151
5715266
35
28
281257
2949675
126521
5515186
17
13
231160
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 69 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Durum and Other Spring Wheat, 2002Durum Other Spring
PracticeStates Program
StatesND MN MT NDPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
2931673
437535
685
214
21
10
161048
52485310
148739
6138241837
35
191854
2643673
295118
522323108
7
261147
63456714
268745
7223213
48
33
308
65
4545648
247333
6127231029
23
251255
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 70 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Soybeans, 2002
PracticeStates
AR IL IN IA KSPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
2724293
1191
1922
14
7
262
5017222
6876
213141548
16
102535
235
17 *
1676
613111026
12
39
18
3212233
4838
311151551
15
163126
3313383
3736
*1764
20
11
91531
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 71 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Soybeans, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates
KY LA MD MI MNPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
3419245
5804
*14101331
8
262027
49342010
7338
52090
80
13
21115
171416 *
9644
817189
41
23
261310
3236378
28713
*6
142
43
17
113430
2316351
*727
219153
45
15
51125
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 72 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Soybeans, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates
MS MO NE NC NDPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
58274620
6185
333
*44
5
1474
391613 *
4693
*745
40
2
151420
31142010
19310
224181
57
19
351833
3251447
5678
17
199
59
12
151820
3335502
18321
*1623 *61
25
131848
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 73 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Soybeans, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates Program
StatesOH SD TN VA WIPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
3016254
2703
1583
34
8
71814
198
27 *
68311
326168
54
25
185
10
1911121
13609
716103
48
16
143121
251333 *
64710
815111058
16
305
16
141111 *
47414
29
11 *29
18
123028
3118263
4727
212128
42
13
121923
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 74 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Soybeans, 2002
PracticeStates
AR IL IN IA KSPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
5140507
4372
41744
23
6812
2125
5220223
4888
216161653
7118
123036
267
15 *
1703
310171834
8311
31216
3916282
4856
211172145
7518
182022
3920435
5614
*2083
22
8312
61926
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 75 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Soybeans, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates
KY LA MD MI MNPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
317
164
4813
*9
125
29
724
181620
4225124
6304
41612 *78
717
21210
311527 *
6704
320251046
8031
311210
40414015
19210
*7
162
48
7215
113636
2314332
*734
529173
42
7116
41219
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 76 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Soybeans, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates
MS MO NE NC NDPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
66315625
6246
4332
42
808
1964
451414 *
6662
*754
37
725
181115
37132112
19011
128221
55
8527
341837
3437552
6605
*9
151057
7817
251821
2740551
18315
*1725 *68
6120
102150
* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 77 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Soybeans, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates Program
StatesOH SD TN VA WIPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted systematically for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Biotech varieties with herbicide resistance only 1 Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
328
332
2712
14
158
42
7311
31511
273
31 *
97811
637227
57
8938
1568
189
121
10548
523177
48
( 1 )21
162424
188
271
65714
917151268
( 1 )21
335
13
241510 *
48210
213140
33
7829
144621
3717293
4746
216151045
( 1 )17
121822
* Less than one percent. 1 State data not available.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 78 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Winter Wheat, 2002
PracticeStates
CO IL KS MO MTPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
6649518
9596
4079
156
12
30117
5120305
537420
611145
12
9
469
3528503
30559
227624
7
115
15
4122431
325322
22212
2
72
30
2645705
447029
6526291117
21
203260
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 79 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Winter Wheat, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates Program
StatesNE OH OK TX WAPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
FarmsPercent of
Farms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
2422513
186322
199
131010
6
271022
396
27 *
517711
165
1634
5
171127
29303810
7175
3559
1410
9
105
17
4229434
63012
367448
2
111
15
51367310
486627
7038354
38
26
202264
3726454
295413
299
1058
8
138
21* Less than one percent.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 80 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Winter Wheat, 2002
PracticeStates
CO IL KS MO MTPercent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres Percent of Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
5239437
11597
371113157
17
24139
5023387
587815
551585
16
14
41211
3823524
32527
247636
7
96
16
5232402
285214
33322
3
116
22
2541693
416629
6131328
17
19
252963
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 81 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Winter Wheat, 2002 (continued)
PracticeStates Program
StatesNE OH OK TX WAPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
AcresPercent of
Acres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Alternate planting locations
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Scouting used to make decisions Maintain ground cover or physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides
3130624
276012
352217118
8
251220
4211311
498711
214
1576
4
156
28
3431478
10268
386
111213
13
117
16
4944547
113612
34945
12
7
144
17
4333766
396323
6732317
35
24
222060
4030535
275112
3512127
12
11
149
23
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 82 NASS, USDA
Survey, Estimation Procedures, and Reliability
Survey Procedures: Data for corn, soybeans, and wheat were collected during the months of Augustthrough December of 2002. Data for soybeans were obtained from the 2002 Agricultural ResourcesManagement Survey (ARMS). Large screening samples were drawn from the NASS List SamplingFrame. This extensive sampling frame covers all types of farms and accounts for approximately 82% ofall land in farms in the U.S. The screening samples were selected in such a way as to insure that allfarms on the list had a possibility of being selected. Farms that were more likely to be producers ofsoybeans were more likely to be in the screening sample. The sampled farms were screened to determineif they grew soybeans in 2002. From this subpopulation of operations identified as producing soybeans,a subsample of farms was selected in such a way as to insure that each identified producer had anopportunity to be selected. In general, larger farms were more likely to be selected than smaller farms. Once a farm producing soybeans was selected, one soybean field was randomly selected from all thesoybean fields on the farm. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtaininformation on chemical applications made to the selected field.
Data for corn, durum, other spring, and winter wheat were obtained from the Field Crop Chemical UseSurvey (FCCUS). The samples for FCCUS were drawn via the Objective Yield Survey (OYS). TheOYS samples were drawn from the NASS Area Sampling Frame. The Area Sampling frame covers theentire continental US, thus accounting for 100% of all land in farms in the targeted states. Largescreening samples were drawn, and acreage was screened to determine the presence of the crops ofinterest. From this subpopulation, individual acres of the targeted commodity were sampled for OYS. In FCCUS, data were collected for the field that contained the OYS sampled acre(s). A large field wasmore likely to be selected than a small field. FCCUS data for the field were only collected once, even ifa field contained multiple OYS samples. If an operation had multiple fields selected, then only one fieldwas used. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtain information onchemical applications made to the selected field.
Field Crops Chemical Use Estimation Procedures: The chemical application data, reported byproduct name or trade name, are reviewed within each State and across States for reasonableness andconsistency. This review compares reported data with manufacturer’s recommendations and with datafrom other farm operators using the same product. Following this review, product information isconverted to an active ingredient level. The chemical usage estimates in this publication consist ofsurvey estimates of those active ingredients.
Estimates of the total amount of active ingredient applied are based on the acreage estimates published inthe annual NASS report “Crop Production - 2002 Summary” [Cr Pr 2-1(03)] for corn, soybean, durum,other spring, and winter wheat.
The estimates for total amount applied will not be revised even if there are subsequent revisions toacreage for a given crop.
Detailed data within a table may not multiply across or add down due to independent rounding of thepublished values.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 83 NASS, USDA
Survey, Estimation Procedures, and Reliability (continued)
Field Crops Chemical Usage Reliability: The surveys were designed so that the estimates arestatistically representative of chemical use on the targeted crops in the surveyed states. The reliability ofthese survey results is affected by sampling variability and non- sampling errors. The results of thissurvey are subject to sampling variability. Sampling variability is a measure of how the estimates woulddiffer if other samples had been drawn. The sampling variability expressed as a percent of the estimate iscalled the coefficient of variation (cv). Sampling variability of the estimates differed considerably bychemical and crop. Variability for estimates of acres treated will be higher than the variability forestimates of application rates. This is because application rates have a narrower range of responses, arerecommended by the manufacturer of the product, and are generally followed. In general, the more oftenthe chemical was applied, the smaller the sampling variability. For example, estimates of use of acommonly used product, such as atrazine, will exhibit less variability than a more rarely used product.For more commonly used chemicals, cv's will range from 5-35 percent at the U.S. level and 5-75 percentat the state or regional level. Some rarer items could have cv's above 100 percent. These items haveinsufficient data for publication and these instances are noted with an asterisk (*). Non-sampling errorsoccur during a survey process, and unlike sampling variability, are difficult to measure. They may becaused by interviewers failing to follow instructions, poorly worded questions, non-response,problematic survey procedures, or data handling mistakes between collection and publication. In thesesurveys, all survey procedures and analyses were carried out in a consistent and orderly manner tominimize the occurrence of these types of errors.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 84 NASS, USDA
Terms and Definitions
Active ingredient: Refers to the mechanism of action in pesticides which kills or controls the targetpests. Usage data are reported by pesticide product and are converted to an amount of active ingredient. A single method of conversion has been chosen for active ingredients having more than one way ofbeing converted. For example in this report, copper compounds are expressed in their metallic copperequivalent, and others such as 2,4-D and glyphosate are expressed in their acid equivalent.
Allelopathic: The release of chemical compounds from a plant that will inhibit the growth of anotherplant, such as weeds.
Application Rates: Refer to the average number of pounds of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticideactive ingredient applied to an acre of land. Rate per application is the average number of poundsapplied per acre in one application. Rate per crop year is the average number of pounds applied per acrecounting multiple applications. Number of applications is the average number of times a treated acrereceived a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient.
Area applied: Represents the percentage of crop acres receiving one or more applications of a specificprimary nutrient or active ingredient. This report does not contain acre treatments. However, acretreatments can be calculated by multiplying the acres planted (harvested for winter wheat) by the percentof area applied and the average number of applications.
Avoidance: May be practiced when pest populations exist in a field or site but the impact of the pest onthe crop can be avoided through some cultural practice. Examples of avoidance tactics include croprotation such that the crop of choice is not a host for the pest, choosing cultivars with genetic resistanceto pests, using trap crops, choosing cultivars with maturity dates that may allow harvest before pestpopulations develop, fertilization programs to promote rapid crop development, and simply not plantingcertain areas of fields where pest populations are likely to cause crop failure. Some tactics forprevention and avoidance strategies may overlap.
The following pest management questions were categorized as avoidance practices:
Did you adjust planting or harvesting dates to control pests?
Did you rotate crops for the purpose of controlling pests?
Did you choose planting locations to avoid cross infestation of insects or disease?
Beneficial Insects: Insects collected and introduced into locations because of their value in biologiccontrol as prey on harmful insects and parasites.
Chemigation: Application of an agricultural chemical by injecting it into irrigation water.
Common name: An officially recognized name for an active ingredient. This report shows activeingredient by common name.
Crop year: Refers to the period immediately following harvest of the previous crop through harvest ofthe current crop.
Cultivars: A horticulturally or agriculturally derived variety of a plant, as distinguished from a naturalvariety.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 85 NASS, USDA
Terms and Definitions (continued)
Farm: Any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or wouldnormally be sold during the year. Government payments are included in sales. Places with all acreageenrolled in set aside or other government programs are considered operating.
Fertilizer: Refers to applications of the primary nutrients; nitrogen, phosphate, and potash.
Fungi: A lower form of parasitic plant life which often reduces crop production and/or lowers the gradequality of its host.
Land in Farms: All land operated as part of a farming operation during the year. It includes crop andlivestock acreage, wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland, and land enrolledin the Conservation Reserve Program and other set aside, conservation, or commodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial, and grazing association land and nonagricultural land. It excludes all landoperated by establishments not qualifying as farms.
Monitoring: Includes proper identification of pests through systematic sampling or counting or otherforms of scouting. Also, weather monitoring to predict levels of pest populations or to determine themost effective time to make pesticide applications, and soil testing where appropriate.
The following pest management practices questions were categorized as monitoring practices:
Was this crop scouted for pests (weeds, insects or disease) using a systematic method?
Was this field scouted for pest by performing systematic sampling or counting? (soybeans)
Where electronic or written records kept to track the activity or numbers of different pests?
Did you use field mapping of previous weed problems to assist you in making weed managementdecisions?
Did you use soil analysis to detect the presence of soilborne pests or pathogens?
Did you use weather monitoring to predict the need for pesticide applications?
Did you use weather data to help determine when to make pesticide applications? (soybeans)
Nematodes: Microscopic, worm-shaped parasitic animals. Damage to many crops can be severe.
Pesticides: As defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), pesticidesinclude any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling ormitigating any pest, and any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator,defoliant, or desiccant. The four classes of pesticides presented in this report and the pests targeted are:herbicides - weeds, insecticides - insects, fungicides - fungi, and other chemicals - other forms of life. Miticides and nematicides are included as insecticides while soil fumigants, growth regulators,defoliants, and desiccants are included as other chemicals.
Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to otherindividuals of the same species for one or more behavioral responses.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 86 NASS, USDA
Terms and Definitions (continued)
Prevention: Is the practice of keeping a pest population from infesting a crop or field. It includes suchtactics as using pest-free seeds or transplants, alternative tillage approaches such as no-till or strip-tillsystems, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to insects or disease, irrigation scheduling to avoidsituations conducive to disease development, cleaning tillage and harvesting equipment between fields oroperations, using field sanitation procedures, and eliminating alternate hosts or sites for insect pests anddisease organisms.
The following pest management questions were categorized as prevention practices:
Did you clean tillage or harvesting implements after completing fieldwork for the purpose ofreducing the spread of weeds, diseases or other pests?
Did you remove or plow down crop residues to control pests?
Did you use practices such as tilling, mowing, burning, or chopping of field edges, lanes,ditches, roadways, or fence lines to manage pests?
Did you use water management practices, such as controlled drainage or irrigation scheduling,excluding chemigation, to control pests?
Suppression: Tactics include cultural practices such as narrow row spacings or optimized in-row plantpopulations, using cover crops or mulches, or using crops with allelopathic potential in the rotation. Physical suppression tactics may include cultivation or mowing for weed control, baited or pheromonetraps for certain insects, and temperature management or exclusion devices for insect and diseasemanagement. Biological pesticides and controls, including mating disruption for insects, can beconsidered as alternatives to conventional pesticides. Determining pest thresholds and alternatingpesticide active ingredients to avoid resistance buildup are suppression methods which minimizepesticide use.
The following questions were categorized as suppression practices:
Did you use scouting data and compare it to university or extension guidelines for infestationthresholds to determine when to take measures to control pests?
Did you use topically applied biological pesticides such as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), insectgrowth regulators, neem or other natural products to control pests?
Did you maintain ground covers, mulches or physical barriers to reduce pest problems?
Did you adjust row spacing, plant density or row direction to control pests?
Did you alternate pesticides to keep pests from becoming resistant to pesticides (use pesticideswith different mechanisms of action)?
Trade name: A trademark name given to a specific formulation of a pesticide product. A formulationcontains a specific concentration of the active ingredient, carrier materials, and other ingredients such asemulsifiers and wetting agents.
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 87 NASS, USDA
Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes
The following is a list showing common name, associated class, and trade name of active ingredients inthis publication. The classes are herbicides (H), insecticides (I), fungicides (F), and other chemicals (O). This list is provided as an aid in reviewing pesticide data. Pre-mixes are not cataloged. The list is notcomplete for all pesticides used on corn, soybeans, durum, other spring, and winter wheat and NASSdoes not mean to imply use of any specific trade name.
Class Common Name Trade Name
H 2,4-D Agsco, Amine, Banvel + 2,4-D, Barrage, Class,Clean Crop, Curtail, Dacamine, Defy, Envy, Formula,Hi-Dep, Landmaster, Lithate, Riverside, RT Master,Salvo, Savage, Shotgun, Starane + Saber, Turret,Weed Rhap, Weedar, Weedone
H 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt Range Star H 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt Butoxone, ButyracH 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Amine I Acephate OrtheneH Acetamide Axiom, Define, Domain, EpiH Acetic acid Esteron, LV 400 2,4-D Weed Killer, Starane + Salvo H Acetochlor Degree Xtra, DoublePlay, Field Master, Fultime,
Harness, Surpass, TopNotch H Acifluorfen Blazer, Conclude, Scepter, Storm H Alachlor Bronco, Bullet, Lariat, Lasso, Micro-Tech, PartnerI Aldicarb TemikH Atrazine Aatre, Banvel-K + Atrazine, Basis Gold, Bicep,
Buctril + Atrazine, Bullet, Degree, Extrazine,Field Master, Fultime, Guardsman, Harness, Laddok,Lariat, LeadOff, Liberty, Marksman, Moxy + Atrazine,Ready Master, Shotgun, Simazat, Surpass
F Azoxystrobin Quadris (Abound) H Bentazon Basagran, Conclude, Laddok, Rezult, Storm I Benzoic acid Intrepid I Bifenthrin CaptureH Bromoxynil Bromox/MCPA, Bronate, Buctril, Moxy + AtrazineH Bromoxynil octanoate BronateI Bt Condor H Butoxy. ester 2,4-D 2,4-D/Weedone LV6 I Carbaryl SevinI Carbofuran FuradanH Carfentrazone-ethyl AIM I Chlorethoxyfos FortressH Chlorimuron-ethyl Authority, Canopy, Classic, Reliance, SynchronyI Chlorpyrifos Chlorpyrifos, Lorsban H Chlorsulfuron Finesse, Glean
--- continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 88 NASS, USDA
Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes (continued)
Class Common Name Trade Name
H Clethodim Conclude, Select H Clodinafop-propargil Discover H Clomazone Command H Clopyralid Accent, Curtail, HornetH Cloransulam-methyl Amplify, FirstRate, Frontrow, Gauntlet H Colleto. gloeospor Collego (fungal spores) H Cyanazine Bladex, Cy-Pro, ExtrazineI Cyfluthrin Aztec I Cypermethrin AmmoH Dicamba Banvel, Celebrity, Clarity, Fallow Master, NorthStar,
Rave, WeedmasterH Dicamba, Dimet. salt Distinct, Range Star, SterlinH Dicamba, Pot. salt Banvel-K + Atrazine, Marksman H Dicamba, Sodium salt Celebrity, YukonH Dichlorprop WeedoneH Diclofop-methyl HoelonI Dicrotophos BidrinH Difenzoquat AvengeI Diflubenzuron DimilinH Diflufenzopyr-sodium Celebrity, DistinctH Dimethenamid Detail, Frontier, Guardsman, LeadOffH Dimethenamid-P Guardsman, OutlookI Dimethoate Cygon, DigonI Disulfoton Di-Syston H EPTC DoublePlay I Esfenvalerate AsanaH Ethalfluralin SonalanI Ethoprop MocapH Fenoxaprop Bugle, Cheyenne, Fusion, Puma I Fipronil Regent, Regent H Fluazifop-P-butyl Fusilade, Fusion, TyphoonH Flucarbazone-sodium Everest H Flumetsulam Accent Gold, Bicep, Broadstrike + Dual,
Broadstrike + Treflan, Frontrow, Hornet, Python H Flumiclorac-pentyl Resource H Flumioxazin Valor H Fluroxypyr Starane, Starane + SaberH Fluroxypyr 1-methyl Starane + Sword, Starane + SalvoH Fomesafen Flexstar, Reflex, TyphoonI Fonofos DyfonateH Foramsulfuron Option
--- continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 89 NASS, USDA
Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes (continued)
Class Common Name Trade Name
H Glufosinate-ammonium LibertyH Glyphosate Accord, Backdraft, Buccaneer, Clear-Out, Gly Star,
Cornerstone, Extreme, Fallow Master, Field Master,Glyfos, Glyphomax, Honcho, Landmaster, Mirage,RT Master, Rattler, Ready Master, Roundup
H Glyphosate diam. salt TouchdownH Halosulfuron Permit, YukonI Helicoverpa zea NPV GemstarH Imazamethabenz AssertH Imazamox RaptorH Imazapyr LightningH Imazaquin Backdraft, Detail, Scepter, Squadron, Steel H Imazaquin, sod. salt Scepter H Imazethapyr Extreme, Lightning, Pursuit, Steel I Imidacloprid GauchoI Indoxacarb Steward H Isoxaflutole Balance, EpiH Lactofen Cobra, Phoenix I Lambda-cyhalothrin Karate, WarriorH Linuron Lorox H MCPA Agsco, Bromox, Bronate, Cheyenne, Class, Curtail,
MCP Ester, MCP Amine, Rhomene, Rhonox, Starane + Sword, Sword, Weedone MCPA Ester
I Malathion MalathionF Mancozeb DithaneH Mesotrione Callisto I Methomyl Lannate I Methyl parathion Declare, Penncap-M H Metolachlor Bicep, Broadstrike + Dual, Dual, TurboH Metribuzin Axiom, Boundary, Canopy, Domain, Lexone,
Sencor, Turbo H Metsulfuron-methyl Ally, Canvas, Finesse H Nicosulfuron Accent, Basis, Celebrity, DPX-79406, Steadfast H Oxyfluorfen GoalH Paraquat Gramoxone, Gramoxone/CycloneH Pendimethalin Prowl, Pursuit, Squadron, Steel I Permethrin Ambush, Pounce I Phorate Thimet H Picloram TordonH Primisulfuron Beacon, Exceed, NorthStar, Spirit
--- continued
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 90 NASS, USDA
Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes (continued)
Class Common Name Trade Name
F Propiconazole Stratego, TiltH Prosulfuron Exceed, Peak, SpiritH Pyridate Tough/Lentagran, Tough H Quizalofop-P-ethyl AssureH Quizalofop-ethyl Assure H Rimsulfuron Accent, Basis, DPX-79406, Steadfast H S-Metolachlor Bicep, Boundary, DualH Sethoxydim Conclude B&G, Poast, Rezult, UltimaH Simazine Caliber, Princep, Simazat, Simazine O Sodium chlorate Sodium ChlorateI Spinosad Success H Sulfentrazone Authority, Canopy, Command, Gauntlet, Spartan H Sulfosate TouchdownH Sulfosulfuron Maverick F Sulfur SulfurF Tebuconazole Folicur I Tebupirimphos AztecI Tefluthrin ForceI Terbufos CounterH Thifensulfuron Ally, Basis, Canvas, Harmony, Pinnacle, Reliance,
Synchrony, CheyenneI Thiodicarb Larvin F Thiophanate-methyl Tilt, TopsinH Tralkoxydim AchieveI Tralomethrin ScoutH Triallate Buckle, Far-GoH Triasulfuron Amber, Rave H Tribenuron-methyl Ally Extra, Canvas, Express, Harmony, CheyenneF Trifloxystrobin Stratego H Trifluralin Broadstrike + Treflan, Buckle, Treflan, Tri-4,
Trifluralin, Trilin, TrustH Vernolate VernamI Zeta-cypermethrin Fury, Mustang
A FERTILIZER and NUTRIENT APPLICATIONS---SELECTED FIELD A
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 91 NASS, USDA
COMPLETION CODE forFERTILIZER and NUTRIENT EDIT TABLE
1 Incomplete/Refusal3 Valid Zero
200
1. Were any commercial FERTILIZERS (nitrogen, phosphate, and potash)applied to the selected field for the 2002 corn crop?
[Read the items to be included from the list below before accepting a “NO” answer.] . . . . . . YES=1
CODE201
INCLUDE EXCLUDE
Custom applied fertilizersFertilizer applied in the fall of 2001 andearlier,
if this field was fallow in 2001Commercially prepared manureApplications made by airplaneNitrogen applied with herbicides for “burn down”
Micro-nutrients (e.g., iron, zinc, boron)Lime and gypsumUnprocessed manureFertilizer applied to previous crops in this field
[If NO fertilizers applied, go to Section B.]
2. Record each fertilizer application on the selected field on aseparate line in the table below.
T-TYPE TABLE2 001
LINE99
OFFICE USELINES IN TABLE
213
1 2 3 4
LINE
MATERIALS USED What quantity wasapplied per acre?
UNIT CODE How many acres weretreated in thisapplication?
[Enter percentage analysis or pounds of actualplant nutrients applied per acre.]
[Show Common Fertilizers in Respondent Booklet.]
1 Pounds
12 Gallons
19 Pounds ofactual nutrients
[Leave this column blankif actual nutrientswere reported.]
NNitrogen
P2O5
PhosphateK2O
Potash ACRES
01205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
02205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
03205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
04205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
05205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
06205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
07205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
08205 206 207 208 209 212
•___
T-TYPE TABLE LINE0 000 00
COMPLETION CODE forPESTICIDE EDIT TABLE
1 Incomplete/Refusal3 Valid Zero
300
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 92 NASS, USDA
B PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS---SELECTED FIELD B
1. Were any PESTICIDES (herbicides, insecticides, fungicides or other chemicals)applied to the selected field for the 2002 corn crop?
[Read the items to be included from the list below before accepting a “NO” answer.] . . . . . . YES=1
CODE301
INCLUDE EXCLUDE
Custom applied pesticidesPesticides applied in the fall of 2001 and earlier,
if this field was fallow in 2001Defoliants or desiccantsBiological and botanical pesticidesApplications made by airplanePartial field treatments
Fertilizers reported earlier in Section ASeed treatmentsSpot treatments (with no discernable acreage)Adjuvants (e.g., wetting agents, stickers, spreaders)Fertilizers applied as foliar spraysApplications to fence rows, ditch banks, etc.
[If NO pesticides applied, go to Section C.]
2. Record all pesticide applications on the selected fieldin the table below.
T-TYPE TABLE
3 001LINE
99OFFICE USE
LINES IN TABLE319
LINE
1 2 3
NOTES
What productswere appliedto this field?
[Show product codes fromRespondent Booklet.]
Was this productbought in
liquid or dryform?
[Enter L or D.]
Was this partof a tank mix?
[If tank mix,enter line number offirst product in mix.]
01305 306
02305 306
03305 306
04305 306
05305 306
06305 306
07305 306
08305 306
09305 306
10305 306
11305 306
12305 306
13305 306
14 305 306
3. [For pesticides not listed in Respondent Booklet, specify --]
LINEPesticide Type
(Herbicide, Insecticide Fungicide, etc.)EPA No. or Tradename
and FormulationForm Purchased(Liquid or Dry)
Where Purchased [Ask only ifEPA No. can’t be reported.]
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 93 NASS, USDA
B PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS---SELECTED FIELD B
CODES for Column 6
1 Pounds12 Gallons13 Quarts14 Pints15 Ounces, fluid28 Ounces, dry30 Grams
4 OR 5 6 7 8
LINE
How much wasapplied per acre per
application?
What was the totalamount appliedper application
in this field?
[Enter unitcode
from above.]
How many acresin this fieldwere treated
with this product?
How many timeswas it applied?
ACRES NUMBER
01308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
02308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
03308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
04308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
05308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
06308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
07308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
08308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
09308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
10308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
11308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
12308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
13308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
14308 309 310 312 313
C ___ ___ C ___ ___ C
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 94 NASS, USDA
C PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES---SELECTED FIELD C
T-TYPE TABLE LINE
0 000 00
Now I have some questions about pest management practices used on the selected field for the2002 corn crop. By pests, we mean weeds, insects and diseases.
1. Was this crop scouted for pests (weeds, insects or disease) using asystematic method? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
CODE446
2. Were electronic or written records kept to track the activity or numbersof different pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
447
3. Did you use scouting data and compare it to university or extensionguidelines for infestation thresholds to determine when to takemeasures to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
448
4. Did you use field mapping of previous weed problems to assist youin making weed management decisions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
449
5. Did you use soil analysis to detect the presence ofsoilborne pests or pathogens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
450
6. Did you use topically applied biological pesticides such asBt (Bacillus Thuringiensis), insect growth regulators, neem orother natural products to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
452
7. Did you use water management practices, such as controlled drainageor irrigation scheduling, excluding chemigation, to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
458
8. Did you remove or plow down crop residues to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1456
9. Did you use practices such as tilling, mowing, burning, or chopping offield edges, lanes, ditches, roadways or fence lines to manage pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
455
10. Did you clean tillage or harvesting implements after completing field workfor the purpose of reducing the spread of weeds, diseases or other pests? . . . . . . . . YES = 1
457
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 95 NASS, USDA
C PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES---SELECTED FIELD C
11. Did you adjust planting or harvesting dates to control pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
CODE460
12. Did you choose planting locations to avoid cross infestation of insectsor disease? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
464
13. Did you rotate crops for the purpose of controlling pests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1462
14. Did you use weather monitoring to predict the need for pesticide application? . . . . YES = 1480
15. Did you alternate pesticides to keep pests from becoming resistant topesticides (use pesticides with different mechanisms of action)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
461
16. Did you adjust row spacing, plant density or row direction to control pests? . . . . . . YES = 1459
17. Did you maintain ground covers, mulches or physical barriers toreduce pest problems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YES = 1
454
[Enumerator Note:Code when all cells in this section are blank.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMPLETION CODE forPEST MANAGEMENT EDIT
1 Incomplete/Refusal
442
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 96 NASS, USDA
Index
-2-
2,4-D, 11, 13, 15, 17-19, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48-50, 59-622,4-D Dimeth. salt, 222,4-DB Dimeth. salt, 42, 552,4-DP Dimeth. salt, 55
-A-
Acephate, 36, 38Acetamide, 11, 14, 15, 17, 42Acetic acid, 11, 22, 28, 42, 44, 59Acetochlor, 11, 13-19Acifluorfen, 42, 44-47Alachlor, 11, 17, 42, 48Aldicarb, 36, 38Atrazine, 11, 13-19, 35, 55, 57Azoxystrobin, 43, 46, 47
-B-
Bentazon, 8, 42, 49Benzoic acid, 43, 46, 47Bifenthrin, 12, 15, 17Bromoxynil, 11, 15, 16, 23, 28, 29, 55, 59, 62Bromoxynil octanoate, 22, 28Bt (Bacillus thur.), 9Butoxy. ester 2,4-D, 8, 35
-C-
Carbaryl, 9, 43Carbofuran, 12, 36Carfentrazone-ethyl, 11, 17, 42, 55, 57Chlorethoxyfos, 9Chlorimuron-ethyl, 42, 44-50Chlorpyrifos, 12-15, 17, 19, 27, 43, 48, 59, 62Chlorsulfuron, 28, 29, 55, 59, 60, 62Clethodim, 8, 42, 44, 50Clodinafop-propargil, 23, 28, 29Clomazone, 42Clopyralid, 11, 13-17, 19, 22, 28, 55, 57
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 97 NASS, USDA
-C (cont)-
Cloransulam-methyl, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48Colleto. gloeospor., 8Cyanazine, 11Cyfluthrin, 12-14, 17Cypermethrin, 4, 9, 12, 36, 38, 43, 46, 55, 59, 60
-D-
Dicamba, 11, 13-19, 23, 28, 29, 35, 55, 59-61Dicamba, Dimet. salt, 11, 13-18, 22, 27Dicamba, Pot. salt, 11, 13, 15-17, 19Dicamba, Sodium salt, 11, 13Dichlorprop, 35Diclofop-methyl, 55, 57Dicrotophos, 36, Difenzoquat, 27, 55, 57Diflubenzuron, 43, 46Diflufenzopyr-sodium, 11, 13, 15-18Dimethenamid, 11, 13-18, 35, 37Dimethenamid-P, 11, 15, 16Dimethoate, 12, 17, 27, 43, 59, 62Disulfoton, 55
-E-
EPTC, 11Esfenvalerate, 9, 43, 48Ethalfluralin, 37, 42, 49Ethoprop, 9
-F-
Fenoxaprop, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44, 45, 47, 55, 57Fipronil, 12, 14, 17Fluazifop-P-butyl, 42, 44, 45, 47, 50Flucarbazone-sodium, 22, 27, 55, 57Flumetsulam, 11, 13-19, 42Flumiclorac-pentyl, 8, 42, 48Flumioxazin, 42Fluroxypyr, 22, 23, 28, 29, 55, 57, 59
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 98 NASS, USDA
-F (cont)-
Fluroxypyr 1-methyl, 23, 28, 29, 59Fomesafen, 42, 44, 45, 47, 50Fonofos, 9Foramsulfuron, 11, 16
-G-
Glufosinate-ammonium, 11, 15, 16Glyphosate, 11, 13-19, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44-50, 59-62Glyphosate diam salt, 8, 42, 44-50
-H-
Halosulfuron, 11, 35Helicoverpa zea NPV, 36, 38
-I-
Imazamethabenz, 55, 57Imazamox, 42, 44, 47, 49, 50Imazapyr, 11, 13, 14Imazaquin, 42, 44, 46, 47Imazaquin, sod. salt, 42Imazethapyr, 11, 13, 14, 42, 44-50Imidacloprid, 55, 57Indoxacarb, 36, 40Isoxaflutole, 11, 13-15, 17, 18
-L-
Lactofen, 42, 44Lambda-cyhalothrin, 12, 13, 43, 46-50, 59Linuron, 35, 37
-M-
Malathion, 36, 40, 55, 57Mancozeb, 9, 56, 58MCPA, 23, 28, 29, 35, 37, 39, 59, 61, 62Mesotrione, 11, 13, 15-17Methomyl, 36, 38
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 99 NASS, USDA
-M (cont)
Methyl parathion, 12, 43, 46, 47, 59, 62Metolachlor, 11, 13-19, 42, 48Metribuzin, 11, 42, 44, 45, 48, 49, 59, 62Metsulfuron-methyl, 28, 29, 59-62
-N-
Nicosulfuron, 11, 13-19
-O-
Oxyfluorfen, 35
-P-
Paraquat, 11, 42, 46, 48, 50, 55, 57Pendimethalin, 11, 19, 42, 44-50Permethrin, 12, 17, 18, 43, 45Phorate, 9, 36, 40Picloram, 28, 57, 59, 61Primisulfuron, 11, 13-17Propiconazole, 9, 22, 28, 29, 56, 59Prosulfuron, 11, 17, 22, 27, 59, 62Pyridate, 8
-Q-Quizalofop-P-ethyl, 42Quizalofop-ethyl, 35, 39
-R-Rimsulfuron, 11, 13, 15-17, 19
-S-
S-Metolachlor, 11, 13-19, 42, 48Sethoxydim, 42, 45, 49Simazine, 11, 13, 18, 35, 37, 39Sodium chlorate, 36, 38Spinosad, 9Sulfentrazone, 3, 27, 42, 44, 45, 48-50
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 100 NASS, USDA
-S (cont)-
Sulfosate, 8, 22, 27, 42, 46Sulfosulfuron, 59, 60, 62Sulfur, 36, 40
-T-
Tebuconazole, 28Tebupirimphos, 12-14, 17Tefluthrin, 12-15, 17Terbufos, 12, 13, 17Thifensulfuron, 8, 23, 28, 29, 42, 47, 59-62Thiodicarb, 43, 46Thiophanate-methyl, 36, 40, 56, 58Tralkoxydim, 55Tralomethrin, 36Triallate, 22, 27, 55, 57Triasulfuron, 22, 28, 29, 59-62Tribenuron-methyl, 23, 28, 29, 42, 44, 59-62Trifloxystrobin, 22, 56, 58Trifluralin, 8, 23, 27, 42, 44, 45, 47-49, 55, 57
-V-
Vernolate, 35, 37
-Z-
Zeta-cypermethrin, 12, 43, 46, 59, 60
Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardMay 2003 101 NASS, USDA
Report Features
Released May 14, 2003 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural StatisticsBoard, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Agricultural Chemical Usage" call ChrisCadwallader (202) 720-6146, office hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET.
The next "Agricultural Chemical Usage" report will be released July 16, 2003. This report will coveragricultural chemical use for the 2002 crop year for vegetables in selected states.
Listed below are persons within the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additionalinformation.
Chris Cadwallader, Environmental Statistician (202) 690-0392
Kevin Hintzman, Head, Environmental and Demographics Section (202) 720-0684
Linda Hutton, Chief, Environmental, Economics, and Demographics Branch (202) 694-5620
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on thebasis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilitieswho require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape,etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W,Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410, or call202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
ACCESS TO REPORTS!!
For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services:
INTERNET ACCESS
All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to theInternet and go to the NASS Home Page at: http:/www.usda.gov/nass/. Select “Today’s Reports” orPublications and then Reports Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subject.
E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION
All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. Startingwith the NASS Home Page at http:/www.usda.gov/nass/, click on Publications, then click on theSubscribe by E-mail button which takes you to the page describing e-mail delivery of reports. Finally,click on Go to the Subscription Page and follow the instructions.
AUTOFAX ACCESS
NASSFax service is available for some reports from your fax machine. Please call 202-720-2000, usingthe handset attached to your fax. Respond to the voice prompts. Document 0411 is a list of availablereports.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS
CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada)Other areas, please call 703-605-6220 FAX: 703-605-6900(Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ASSISTANCE
For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products orservices, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, ore-mail: [email protected].